Abstract
Obviously there is need for a reliable means of automating complement-fixation tests. This paper offers an account of experience with an AutoAnalyzer adapted for this purpose. Results of syphilis screening tests done by the AutoAnalyzer compared with those of tests performed manually showed satisfactory agreement, the automated method being slightly less specific in our hands. There were no false negative results with the AutoAnalyzer if both Maltaner and Reiter protein antigens were used.
The current design of the AutoAnalyzer contains three major shortcomings if it is to be used for large numbers of complement-fixation tests. First and foremost is the relatively slow sampling rate compatible with adequate sample discrimination. Second is the necessity for frequently replenishing the machine with samples. Third is the need for adjusting or cleaning the flow-cell during use.
Full text
PDF
Images in this article
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- BRADSTREET C. M., TAYLOR C. E. Technique of complementfixation test applicable to the diagnosis of virus diseases. Mon Bull Minist Health Public Health Lab Serv. 1962 May;21:96–104. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Irvine W. J. Automated determinations of thyroid and gastric complement-fixing antibody; comparison with the fluorescent antibody and manual complement-fixation methods. Clin Exp Immunol. 1966 Jul;1(3):341–354. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pugh V. W., Gaze R. W. Automated screening method for the Wassermann reaction. Br J Vener Dis. 1965 Sep;41(3):221–227. doi: 10.1136/sti.41.3.221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]