Skip to main content
. 2016 Jan 1;26(1):1–133. doi: 10.1089/thy.2015.0020

Table 1.

Interpretation of the American College of Physicians' Guideline Grading System (for Therapeutic Interventions)

Recommendation Clarity of risk/benefit Implications
Strong recommendation Benefits clearly outweigh harms and burdens, or vice versa. Patients: Most would want course of action; a person should request discussion if an intervention is not offered.
    Clinicians: Most patients should receive the recommended course of action.
    Policymakers: The recommendation can be adopted as policy in most circumstances.
Weak recommendation Benefits closely balanced with harms and burdens. Patients: Many would want course of action, but some may not; the decision may depend on individual circumstances.
    Clinicians: Different choices will be appropriate for different patients; the management decision should be consistent with patients' preferences and circumstances.
    Policymakers: Policymaking will require careful consideration and stakeholder input.
No recommendation Balance of benefits and risks cannot be determined. Decisions based on evidence cannot be made.