Abstract
Background
In traditional laparoscopic cholecistectomy, the cystic duct and artery are commonly closed by metallic clips just before their division. Although the placement of these clips for occluding cystic artery and duct can be considered safe, biliary leaks and bleeding may occur especially by its dislodgement.
Aim
To report a prospective case-series in total clipless cholecystectomy by means of harmonic shears for closure and division of the artery and cystic duct as well removal of the gallbladder from the liver.
Methods
Was evaluate a series of 125 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy where the sealing and division of cystic artery and duct was carried out only by harmonic shears. The intact extracted gallbladder was submitted to a reverse pressure test for assessment of the technique safety by means of CO2 insuflation.
Results
The most common indication for surgery was gallstones. The mean operative time was 26 min and all gallbladders were dissected intact from the liver bed. There was no mortality and the overall morbidity rate was 0.8% with no hemorrhage or leaks. The reverse pressure test showed that all specimens support at least 36-mmHg of pressure without leaking.
Conclusions
The harmonic shears is effective and safe in laparoscopic cholecystectomy as a sole instrument for sealing and division of the artery and cystic duct. The main advantages could be related to the safety and decreased operative time.
Keywords: General surgery, Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, Harmonic shears
Abstract
Racional
A colecistectomia laparoscópica na técnica tradicional oclui o ducto cístico e a artéria cística por clipes cirúrgicos, que podem se deslocar ou desprender no pós-operatório, possibilitando a ocorrência de fístula biliar ou hemorragia.
Objetivo
Relato prospectivo de série de casos de colecistectomias laparoscópicas sem uso de clipe cirúrgico, sendo que a ligadura e secção da artéria cística e do ducto cístico foram realizadas por meio de bisturi ultrassônico.
Métodos
Foram incluídos 125 pacientes submetidos à colecistectomia laparoscópica sem utilização de clipe cirúrgico metálico, onde a ligadura da artéria e do ducto cístico e também a remoção da vesícula biliar de seu leito hepático foram realizadas por meio de tesoura ultrassônica. Realizouse teste de pressão reversa na vesícula biliar removida intacta do leito hepático para verificar a segurança da técnica.
Resultados
A principal indicação cirúrgica foi a colelitíase. O tempo cirúrgico médio foi de 26 min e todas as vesículas biliares foram retiradas intactas do leito hepático. Não houve mortalidade e a taxa global de morbidade foi de 0,8%, sem hemorragias ou fístulas. O teste de pressão reversa mostrou que o ducto cístico ocluído pelo bisturi harmônico suportou ao pelo menos 36 mmHg de pressão sem que ocorresse nenhum vazamento.
Conclusões
O bisturi harmônico é eficaz e seguro em colecistectomias laparoscópicas eletivas como um instrumento único para ocluir e seccionar tanto a artéria cística quanto o ducto cístico. Vantagens podem ser apontadas ao método com relação a sua segurança e diminuição do tempo cirúrgico.
INTRODUCTION
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is accepted as the gold standard surgical methodology for the treatment of gallstones with advantages in comparison over open cholecystectomy especially by minimal invasiveness and faster convalescence19. In traditional laparoscopic cholecystectomy technique, the cystic duct and artery are commonly closed by metallic clips just before their division. Although the placement of these clips for occluding cystic artery and duct could be considered safe, biliary leaks and bleeding may occur especially by its dislodgement23.
Ultrasonic coagulating shears were developed to allow vessels surgical hemostasis and cutting of without bleeding during laparoscopic surgery, by its sealing effect, which is related to coagulation of protein through high frequency ultrasonic vibrations1. In cholecystectomy, the primary use of this device was as an energy form for cutting and coagulating during dissection and removal of the gallbladder from its liver bed2,16.
Several worldwide studies reported the clipless cholecystectomy by using the ultrasonically activated shears as the sole instrument to achieve complete hemo-biliary stasis (cystic duct and artery), most of them with case-series13,8,28,27,3,31,7,24,6,17,14,30. In these 1221 cases there was no hemorrhage reported and the overall incidence of postoperative bile leakage was in agreement with the literature showing that this technique seems to be as safe as the surgical clip.
Besides being equally safe, advantages to clipless cholecystectomy by means of harmonic shears versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a shorter operative time, less incidence of gallbladder perforation, less postoperative pain and less rate of conversion to open cholecystectomy17.
According with these successful reports, herein is related the experience in using the harmonic shears for both gallbladder dissection and closure/division of the cystic duct and artery in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
METHODS
Patients
Over a 15-month interval, all patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy, where the treatment of cystic duct and artery was achieved by means of harmonic/ultrasonic energy (Ultracision® - Ethicon Endosurgery) and operated by authors surgical team with same operative technique were studied and included in this case-series. The study analyzed the indication for surgery, operating time, conversion to open surgery, mean post-operative hospital stay, morbidity and mortality rate and performed a reverse pressure test for testing the safety of occluding cystic duct.
Surgical technique
The laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed by 4-ports (three 5 mm and one 11 mm) placed on the upper abdomen, with the patient lying in the supine position with legs apart and the surgeon stands between them. The following instruments were employed: a 10-mm 30º angle view scope, harmonic shears, grasping forceps and a 5-mm suction probe. The grasping forceps were inserted through the right flank 5-mm cannula and the 5-mm suction probe in the xiphoid position cannula. The forceps was used to grasp the infundibulum, making a rightward traction, and the probe used to make an upward traction of the liver, thus improving the exposure of Calot's triangle. At this point, all dissection maneuvers were carried out by bluntly harmonic shears. The cystic artery was isolated at first. Then the cystic duct was approached. After clear identification of both, the coagulation and division of cystic artery was carried out first with Ultracison® regulated in a power set "3" (median) and the ultrasonic shears were activated and keeping in place by approximately 5 s (time enough for coagulation and division). In sequence, the Ultracision® was down-regulated to power level "1" (which translated into less cutting and more coagulation) and closure and division of cystic duct was reached by holding the jaws of the harmonic shears closed and activated until division of the duct is accomplished (median 15 seconds). In both case (artery and duct) were use the unique application of the ultrasonically activated shears. The blades were closed with kindness and the surgeon avoided excessive traction, allowing until the jaws of the shears were naturally detached from both, artery and duct cystic. Finally, gallbladder dissection and removal from the liver bed was carried out as usual with Ultracision® regulated in a power set "5" (maximum) and it was extracted involved in a plastic bag through the 11-mm trocar.
Reverse pressure test
In the last 12 patients were carried out reverse pressure tests of the sealed cystic duct. Intact gallbladder was immersed into water recipient with a Veress needle punctured in the fundus. The laparoscopic insufflator was connected and gradually the gallbladder was filled by CO2. If any air-escape was observed (by bubbles-air), the pressure was recorded ("bursting pressure-like") (Figure 1).
RESULTS
In this sample, 125 patients (aged 22-68 years - median 45-yo) were included (83 females and 42 males). There were no patients operated on an emergency basis. The indication for surgery was gallstones in 120 cases and there were five cases of gallbladder polyps. The mean operating time was 26 min (range 12 to 52) and no associated procedure was required. To be qualified for the technique the maximum diameter accepted for cystic artery and cystic duct was 5 mm.
Conversion rate to open technique was zero and all gallbladders were dissected intact from liver bed. Intraoperative cholangiography was unnecessary in every case, according guided pre-operative clinical and laboratory examination (abdominal ultrasound, bilirubin and aminotransferases, alkaline phosphatase and gama-glutamiltransferase levels). Was not used any form of postoperative abdominal drainage.
Overall morbidity rate was 0.8% due to only a patient with abdominal pain in upper right, with spontaneous resolution up to 5th postoperative day. Mean postoperative hospital stay was 12 h. All patients demonstrated no clinical evidence of bile leakage or bleeding. The reverse pressure test showed that all specimens support at least 36-mmHg CO2. At this level, no leak (bubbles-air) was observed through cystic duct sealed by harmonic shears. Mortality was nil.
DISCUSSION
Designed to be a safer and better alternative to electrocautery for the hemostatic dissection of tissues in general surgery, the ultrasonically activated shears carry out different functions gathered in one instrument (dissection, coagulation, cutting). By transforming the electric energy into ultrasound vibrations it may offer a lot of advantages for surgery technique, as closure and division of vessels up to 5 mm with safety.
Other great advantage of the harmonic scalpel or shears is the short area of thermal injury. The thermal damage in the rat abdominal wall is width less than 0.2 mm22 and in the liver bed from gallbladder dissection is lower than that of high-frequency electrosurgery10. This might allow the surgeon to use the harmonic dissector closely to anatomical structures like common bile duct with no fear of common bile duct thermal injury and posterior bile leakage.
Beyond being used as a dissector of the gallbladder from its liver bed, the harmonic shears as the sole instrument for hemobiliary stasis is controversial and still provoke some suspicion by surgeons. Technical details of the using this device in total clipless cholecystectomy was described in a book published and sponsored by European Surgical Institute15 with some European countries as Portugal, Spain an France using regularly this methodology.
As the coagulation function of harmonic shears is said by the manufacturer safe when applied to vessels of up to 5 mm and the cystic artery is usually not larger than that, the postoperative bleeding does not seem to be an expected complication.
Otherwise, sealing and division of the cystic duct with only harmonic shears is controversial and the fear that this is not enough to withstand the pressure and carry out a postoperative bile leak could be a limiting factor for its widespread use, especially in large cystic (greater than 5 mm), which is a relative contraindication. In this study, there was no clinical bile leakage, which is according with others reports (Table 1).
TABLE 1.
Author | year | N cases | bile leak |
---|---|---|---|
Huscher et al. | 1999 | 50 | 1 |
Huscher et al. | 2003 | 331 | 7 |
Godina et al. | 2004 | 115 | 0 |
Westervelt et al. | 2004 | 98 | 0 |
Tebala et al. | 2006 | 100 | 0 |
Bessa et al. | 2008 | 60 | 0 |
Vu et al. | 2008 | 22 | 0 |
Gelmini et al. | 2010 | 78 | 0 |
Redwan et al. | 2010 | 80 | 0 |
Nakeeb et al. | 2010 | 60 | 1 |
Kandill et al. | 2010 | 70 | 0 |
Jain et al. | 2011 | 100 | 0 |
Wills et al. | 2013 | 57 | 1 |
Total | 1221 | 10 |
The report of highest rate of bile leaks occurred in a comparative study where one group was comprised by surgeon-in-training, precisely the group with the most of the leaks and technical aspects could then be involved in this occurrence outside normal patterns. Excluding this study from the sample analyzed, the rate of bile leaks drops to 0.33% (3/890), which is according to bile leaks from cystic duct occluding by clips29,11,20.
Although the reported bile leaks in clipless cholecystectomy occurred probably by temporary sealing of the cystic duct by harmonic shears, it is worth remind that post-cholecystectomy bile leaks most commonly occur due to injury of the common bile duct9 and could also come from a duct of Luschka25.
Comparative study with surgical clip sealing the cystic duct with harmonic shears had already proved its safety18. For setting out this, these authors also performed in 12 last cases the "reverse pressure test" and the gallbladder withstood the pressure by laparoscopic insufflator up to 36 mmHg CO2, showing that the harmonic sealing is even safe, which was corroborated by the absence of clinical bile leakage. The airtight pressure of the sealed cystic duct had already been calculated as higher than normal intracystic pressure12. Although there is some controversy about the normal pressure of the common bile duct under normal conditions especially because it is not simple to determine it; the reverse test here done showed that the pressure supported seems to be higher than the intracystic normal pressure measured5,26. Suspicious of a high biliary pressure related to different conditions, as choledocolithiasis for instance, could be considered contraindication to cystic duct application of the ultrasonic shears.
As harmonic shears is a versatile multipurpose instrument, its use in laparoscopic cholecystectomy prevents the frequent extraction and reinsertion of different others instruments with no wasting time. Moreover, as the activation of the harmonic shears does not form a lot of smoking, only a slight mist, it is not necessary to evacuate the pneumoperitoneum to clean up the abdominal cavity so often, both contributing for shortening operative time, even using clips4. These theorical advantages were also experienced in these 125 cases.
However unusual, interesting special advantage is the use of the harmonic energy in patients with heart pacemaker by avoiding electrical interference from conventional surgical diathermy21. Although the regular use of ultrasonic dissection represents a real advantage in comparison with regular electrocauterization, in the majority of the countries this will leads to some increase in the final cost of the procedure and this will represent difficulty, limiting the large acceptation of the method.
As the best of authors knowledge, this is the first Brazilian experience in total clipless cholecystectomy by means harmonic shears and the excellent results (fast operative time, quick hospital stay and especially no common bile duct injury or postoperative bile leak nor hemorrhage) enhanced to continue performing this technique in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy whenever possible. However, it is believed that experimental studies in animal model and randomized clinical trials will offer valuable additional data for until now unanswered questions.
CONCLUSION
The ultrasonically activated shears is effective and safe in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy as a sole instrument for sealing and division of the artery and duct cystic.
Footnotes
Financial source: none
REFERENCES
- 1.Amaral JF. Ultrasonic dissection. Endosc Surg Allied Technol. 1994;2:181–185. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Amaral JF. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in 200 consecutive patients using an ultrasonically activated scalpel. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1995;5:255–262. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bessa SS, Al-Fayoumi TA, Katri KM, Awad AT. Clipless Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy by Ultrassonic Dissection. J Laparosc Adv Surg Tech. 2008;18:593–598. doi: 10.1089/lap.2007.0227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Cengiz Y, Janes A, Grehn A, Israelsson LA. Randomized clinical trial of traditional dissection with electrocautery versus ultrasonic fundus-first dissection in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg. 2005;92:810–813. doi: 10.1002/bjs.4982. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Davenport M, Basu R. Under pressure: choledochal malformation manometry. J Pediatr Surg. 2005;40:331–335. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2004.10.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.El Nakeeb A, Askar W, El Lithy R, Farid M. Clipless laparoscopic cholecystectomy using the Harmonic scalpel for cirrhotic patients: a prospective randomized study. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:2536–2541. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-0999-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Gelmini R, Franzoni C, Zona S, Andreotti A, Saviano M. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy with Harmonic scalpel. JSLS. 2010;14:14–19. doi: 10.4293/108680810X12674612014301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Gòdina M, Tasinato R, Bragato N, Bettineschi F, Menegon P, Griggio L. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy utilizing a harmonic scalpel. 2004. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Heng-Hui Lien, Ching-Shui Huang, Min-Yen Shi, Der-Fang Chen, Nai-Yuan Wang, Feng-Chuan Tai, et al. Management of Bile Leakage After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Based on Etiological Classification. Surg Today. 2004;34:326–330. doi: 10.1007/s00595-003-2712-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Hochstadetr H, Bekavac-Beslin M, Doko M, Kopljar M, Cupic H, Glavan E, et al. Functional Liver Damage during Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy as the Sign of the Late Common Bile Duct Stricture Development. Hepatogastroenterology. 2003;50:676–679. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Huang X, Feng Y, Huang Z. Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in China: an analysis of 39,238 cases. Chinese Med J. 1997;110:704–706. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Huscher CGS, Lirici MM, Anastasi A, Sansonetti A, Amini M. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy by harmonic dissection. Surg Endosc. 1999;13:1256–1257. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Huscher CGS, Lirici MM, Di Paola M, Crafa F, Napolitano C, Mereu A, et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy by ultrasonic dissection without cystic duct and artery ligature. Surg Endosc. 2003;17:442–451. doi: 10.1007/s00464-002-9068-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Jain SK, Tanwar R, Kaza RC, Agarwal PN. A prospective, randomized study of comparison of clipless cholecystectomy with conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech. 2011;21:203–208. doi: 10.1089/lap.2010.0455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Janes A. Clipless laparoscopic cholecystectomy with Harmonic. Euromed Communications: European Surgical Institute, United Kingdom; 2006. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Janssen IMC, Swank DJ, Boonstra O, Knipscheer BC, Klinkenbijl JHG, van Goor H. Randomized clinical trial of ultrasonic versus electrocautery dissection of the gallbladder in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg. 2003;90:799–803. doi: 10.1002/bjs.4128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kandil T, El Nakeeb A, El Hefnawy E. Comparative study between clipless laparoscopic cholecystectomy by harmonic scalpel versus conventional method: a prospective randomized study. J Gastrointest Surg. 2010;14:323–328. doi: 10.1007/s11605-009-1039-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kavlakoglu B, Pekcici R, Oral S. Verification of clipless closure of cystic duct by harmonic scalpel. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech. 2010;20(7):591–595. doi: 10.1089/lap.2010.0222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Keus F, Gooszen HG, Van Laarhoven CJHM. Systematic review: open, small-incision or laparoscopic cholecystectomy for symptomatic cholecystolithiasis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2008;29:359–378. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2008.03894.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Miroshnik M, Saafan A, Koh S, Farlow J, Neophyton J, Lizzio J, et al. Biliary tract injury in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: results of a single unit. ANZ J Surg. 2002;72:867–870. doi: 10.1046/j.1445-2197.2002.02587.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Nandalan SP, Vanner RG. Use of the harmonic scalpel in a patient with a permanent pacemaker. Anaesthesia. 2004;59:621–621. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2004.03817.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Perko Z, Pogorelic Z, Bilan K, Tomic S, Vilovic K, Krnic D, et al. Lateral thermal damage to rat abdominal wall after harmonic scalpel application. Surg Endosc. 2006;20:322–324. doi: 10.1007/s00464-005-0089-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Power C, Maguire D, McAnena OJ, Calleary J. Use of the ultrasonic dissecting scalpel in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2000;14:1070–1073. doi: 10.1007/s004640000034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Redwan AA. Single-working-instrument, double-trocar, clipless cholecystectomy using harmonic scalpel: a feasible, safe, and less invasive technique. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech. 2010;20:597–603. doi: 10.1089/lap.2009.0375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Rulli F, Grasso F. Biliary peritonitis for duct of Luschka bile leak after laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed with a 10-mm harmonic scalpel. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2007;392:111–112. doi: 10.1007/s00423-006-0128-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Sharma N, Bhatnagar V, Srinivas M, Agarwala S, Singh MK, Sharma R. Correlation of intracystic pressure with cyst volume, length of common channel, biochemical changes in bile and histopathological changes in liver in choledochal cyst. J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg. 2014;19:10–16. doi: 10.4103/0971-9261.125946. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Tebala GD. Three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy by harmonic dissection without cystic duct and artery clipping. Am J Surg. 2006;191:718–720. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.07.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Westervelt J. Clipless Cholecystectomy: Broadening the Role of the Harmonic Scalpel. JSLS. 2004;8:283–285. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Wise US, Glick GL, Landeros M. Cystic duct leak after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a multiinstitutional study. Surg Endosc. 1996;10:1189–1193. doi: 10.1007/s004649900276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Wills E, Crawford G. Clipless versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech. 2013;23:237–239. doi: 10.1089/lap.2012.0387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Vu T, Aguilo R, Marshall NC. Clipless technique of laparoscopic cholecystectomy using the harmonic scalpel. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2008;8:612–618. doi: 10.1308/003588408X321558a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]