Abstract
OBJECTIVES
To determine associations between intertwining epidemics (syndemics) and HIV medication adherence and viral load levels among HIV-positive men who have sex with men (MSM); and to test whether adherence mediates the relationship between syndemics and viral load.
DESIGN
We analyzed participant data collected between 2003—2009 from the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study, a prospective HIV/AIDS cohort study in four U.S. cities.
METHODS
We conducted longitudinal analyses (repeated measures mixed models) to assess if differences in viral load levels, undetectable viral load, and self-reported HIV medication adherence were associated with count of syndemic conditions (substance use, depression symptoms, and sexual risk behavior, range 0 to 3), adjusting for race/ethnicity, age, and income. Mediation analyses were conducted using structural equation modeling and the SAS %mediate macro.
RESULTS
Syndemics count was associated with higher viral loads (p<.0001) and lower adherence (p<.0001). Increased counts of concomitant syndemics were associated with viral load (p <.01), detectable viral load (p <.05), and adherence (p <.001). Black MSM experienced worse outcomes across domains than White MSM (p <.0001) and experienced higher overall rates of syndemics (p<.01). Adherence significantly mediated the relationship between syndemics and viral load, accounting for an estimated 32.3% of the effect (p<.05).
CONCLUSIONS
Effectively lowering viral load levels among MSM has implications for both HIV/AIDS prevention and care. Our findings suggest that integrating substance use interventions, mental health care, and sexual risk prevention into standard HIV care may be necessary to optimize treatment and Treatment as Prevention (TasP) models.
Keywords: HIV/AIDS, antiretroviral therapy, drug users, viral load, sexual behavior, psychosocial factors, men who have sex with men
INTRODUCTION
Men who have sex with men (MSM) accounted for 65% of new HIV diagnoses in the U.S. in 2013 [1]. HIV incidence rates have been estimated at 2.4% annually for MSM [2]. Among all risk groups, HIV incidence is increasing most sharply among younger MSM, especially African Americans [3]. High background HIV prevalence has been theorized to explain HIV incidence disparities among and within MSM [4-6]. Populations hosting high background HIV prevalence rates experience greater likelihoods for new HIV infections, as each sexual act involves a higher probability of involving a partner with HIV viremia sufficient for transmission. Efforts to reduce viremia among HIV-positive individuals underpin the HIV care continuum, which delineates the proportions of people living with HIV in the U.S. who are aware of their status (80%); linked to care (62%); retained in care (41%); receive antiretroviral therapy (ART) (36%); and have undetectable viral load (28%) [7]. Reducing HIV incidence among MSM requires that HIV-positive MSM are assisted in achieving undetectable viral loads [8, 9]. Now more than 15 years into the ART era, we have yet to reach this goal nationwide. This suggests that there are significant barriers preventing HIV-positive MSM from achieving undetectable viral loads.
Syndemics Theory as applied to MSM posits that MSM experience a set of synergistic epidemics that combine to amplify HIV risk, acquisition and transmission. According to Syndemics Theory, early life adversities, such as violence victimization, faced by MSM are associated with psychosocial conditions, including depression and substance use, in young adulthood, which in turn influence sexual risk behavior that, coupled with high background HIV prevalence, leads to high HIV incidence rates and other health disparities in adulthood [10-20]. Recent research has demonstrated robust associations between early social adversities such as childhood abuses and syndemic production in adulthood among MSM [11]. While the concept was developed largely using samples of dominant culture MSM, syndemic effects have also been measured among Black MSM [12]. Higher rates of independent syndemic variables, for example stimulant drug use, have been linked to HIV sero-conversions among MSM [21]. Substance use, especially stimulants, has also been associated with increased viral replication [22, 23], higher viral load levels [24], and lower ART adherence [25] among HIV-positive MSM, though consistent ART adherence among stimulant users has been shown to swamp stimulants’ measured negative immune effects [26]. Depression has been associated with lower adherence and poor HIV treatment outcomes [27-29]. However, few studies have attempted to test the additive and collective effects of syndemics on ART adherence and viral load suppression; and little research has been done analyzing these effects longitudinally.
To respond to this gap in the literature, we assessed the longitudinal associations of syndemics on adherence and viral load among HIV-positive MSM. Specifically, we asked the following three research questions. First, is higher syndemics count (the number of syndemic conditions experienced concomitantly) associated with weaker viral load suppression? Second, are higher syndemics counts associated with lower ART adherence? Finally, does adherence mediate the relationship between syndemics count and viral load? To answer these questions, we analyzed biological, psychosocial, and behavioral data over a period of seven years, using a sample of sexually active, HIV-positive MSM participating in the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study (MACS).
METHODS
Sample
A longstanding observational cohort study of the natural and treated history of HIV/AIDS among MSM in the U.S., the MACS began enrollment in 1984, recruiting successive cohorts in Los Angeles, Pittsburgh, Chicago, and Baltimore. Descriptions of recruitment strategies and research design can be found elsewhere [30, 31]. Every six months, MACS participants complete behavioral and medical surveys, neuropsychological and physical examinations, and collection of blood and other specimens. All MACS participants were offered a supplemental survey, the Methamphetamine Sub-Study, in 2008-2009, corresponding to study visits (waves) 49 and 50; this survey collected data about life-course characteristics theorized to be associated with heightened HIV behavioral risk. The present analysis considered psychosocial, behavioral, and biomedical measures from the 766 MSM who were either HIV-positive at wave 38 (2003-2004) or who sero-converted by wave 50; who reported sexual activity with men during this span; and who were offered the Methamphetamine Sub-Study in waves 49/50. A subset of 712 of these men reporting ART use during this span was included in adherence-related analyses.
Measures
Sociodemographics
Measures for sociodemographic covariates (income, race/ethnicity, bisexual behavior, and recent sero-conversion) have been described elsewhere [11, 32].
HIV viral load
Measured using the COBAS Ultrasensitive Amplicor HIV-1 monitor assay for HIV RNA (Roche Molecular Systems, Branchburg, NJ), sensitive to 50 copies HIV RNA/mL3. We used a dichotomous variable to denote undetectable (<50 copies/mL3) vs. detectable HIV viral load for binary outcomes; and log10-transformed viral load values for continuous outcomes.
ART adherence
Assessed using an adherence scale measuring four levels of self-reported adherence since last visit, which has been described elsewhere [28, 33].
Depression symptoms
Assessed at each visit using the Center for Epidemiologic Study of Depression symptom checklist. We created a dichotomous variable assessing whether participants had a score ≥16, a cut-off point associated with depression symptoms [34, 35].
Polysubstance use
Using audio computer-assisted self-interviewing (ACASI), participants reported frequency of using each of the following per visit: crack cocaine, powder cocaine, marijuana, ecstasy, heroin, methamphetamines, and other street or club drugs. Longitudinal dichotomous variables were computed assessing whether participants reported using ≥2 of these substances at least monthly.
Condomless anal sex with casual male partner(s)
Men were asked to distinguish insertive and receptive anal sex behaviors with casual male partners from those behaviors with main male partners. Dichotomous variables were created that corresponded to any condomless anal sex with casual male partners per visit (referred to as “UAI”, for unprotected anal intercourse).
Syndemics count
The sum (0-3) per subject, by visit, of the number of syndemic conditions experienced (depression symptoms, polysubstance use, and UAI); treated as a continuous variable.
Statistical analysis
To test for longitudinal effects of syndemics on viral load and ART adherence, we conducted a series of generalized linear mixed models (SAS PROC GLIMMIX), using a repeated measures statement to control for within-subject variance across time and a distribution statement (e.g., binary for dichotomous outcome variables; gamma for right-skewed continuous variables) with corresponding log-link specifying appropriate distributions. Covariance matrices were derived from each model's variance components. Least-squares means were estimated using observed margins for independent variable groups; within-group analyses were conducted by level (to estimate additive effects) and further adjusted using the studentized maximum modular approach to minimize error rates associated with heteroscedasticity and subgroup multiplicity (e.g., outcomes within race/ethnicity groups and additive effects by syndemics count). Trajectory effects of syndemics count on viral load over time were included in these models, estimated using a predictor X time statement (e.g., syndemics count*wave). In post-hoc analyses, we used the statistical approaches described above to test associations between syndemics count and race/ethnicity subgroups; and to assess the interrelatedness of variables comprising syndemics count.
Mediation analyses were conducted to test relationships between syndemics count, ART adherence, and viral load. We hypothesized that the relationship between syndemics count and log10 viral load was mediated by adherence in MSM who reported using ART. We used a structural equation modelling (SEM) approach using STATA 13.0 that estimated the total, direct and indirect effects of the relationships between syndemics count, ART adherence, and viral load. SEM analyses utilized a cross-lagged panel model, operationalizing “since last visit” measures of adherence and syndemics count as “lagged” measures for each visit's contemporaneous viral load measure, controlling for participants’ prior reported values of syndemics count, adherence, and viral load [36]. Then, we estimated the percentage of the longitudinal mediated effect of adherence on the relationship between syndemics count and viral load, using the publicly available SAS macro, %mediate (http://www.hsph.harvard.edu/faculty/spiegelman/mediate.html)[37]. All models were adjusted for race/ethnicity; annual income<$20,000; recent sero-conversion; bisexual behavior; age<40; and wave. We reported overall fixed effects p-values and least-squares means estimates for outcomes of interest, as well as F-statistics across group classifications (collective effects) for continuous outcomes.
RESULTS
Sociodemographics
Table 1 shows that of the 766 HIV-positive, sexually-active MSM in this sample, 57.8% identified as non-Hispanic White; 7.3% as Hispanic White; 26.8% as Black; 6% as other Hispanic; and 1% as Hispanic Black. The vast majority (86.2%) were over 40, with 11.5% between 30 and 39, and 2.3% between 20 and 29. 42.7% were recruited in the first cohort (1984); 10.1% in the second cohort (1987); and 47.3% in the most recent cohort (2002). Participants were similarly represented in Baltimore (23.1%), Chicago (23.0%), and Pittsburgh (21.9%), with Los Angeles most represented (32.0%). 6.3% reported bisexual behavior between waves 38-50 while 93.7% had sex only with men.
Table 1.
Sociodemographics of sexually active HIV-positive MSM in the MACS, wave 50 (n=766)
| Sociodemographics | Subcategory | N (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Race/ethnicity | ||
| White, Hispanic | 56 (7.3%) | |
| White, non-Hispanic | 443 (57.8%) | |
| Black, non-Hispanic | 205 (26.8%) | |
| Black, Hispanic | 8 (1.0%) | |
| American Indian or Alaskan | 1 (0.1%) | |
| Asian or Pacific Islander | 0 (0%) | |
| Other | 7 (0.9%) | |
| Other Hispanic | 46 (6.0%) | |
| MACS site | ||
| Baltimore | 177 (23.1%) | |
| Chicago | 176 (23.0%) | |
| Pittsburgh | 168 (21.9%) | |
| Los Angeles | 245 (32.0%) | |
| Cohort | ||
| 1984 | 327 (42.7%) | |
| 1987 | 77 (10.1%) | |
| 2002 | 362 (47.3%) | |
| Age | ||
| 20-29 | 18 (2.3%) | |
| 30-39 | 88 (11.5%) | |
| 40-49 | 271 (35.4%) | |
| 50-59 | 299 (39.0%) | |
| 60+ | 90 (11.7%) | |
| Income | ||
| <$10,000 | 144 (18.8%) | |
| $10,000-$19,999 | 123 (16.1%) | |
| $20,000-$29,999 | 86 (11.2%) | |
| $30,000-$39,999 | 65 (8.5%) | |
| $40,000-$49,999 | 57 (7.4%) | |
| $50,000-$59,999 | 57 (7.4%) | |
| $60,000 or more | 189 (24.7%) | |
| No response | 45 (5.9%) | |
| Education | ||
| 8th grade or less | 9 (1.2%) | |
| 9th, 10th, 11th grade | 32 (4.2%) | |
| 12th grade/HS degree | 96 (12.5%) | |
| Some college, no degree | 210 (27.4%) | |
| College degree | 140 (18.3%) | |
| Some graduate work | 72 (9.4%) | |
| Graduate degree | 145 (18.9%) | |
| No response | 62 (8.1%) | |
| Sexual behavior (waves 38-50) | ||
| MSMO | 718 (93.7%) | |
| MSMW | 48 (6.3%) |
ART adherence
Table 2 shows that overall, syndemics count was significantly associated with reported ART adherence (F=37.75, p<.0001), though trajectories of adherence were not associated with syndemics count (F=0.94, p=0.57). Racial/ethnic minority status (F=42.58, p<.0001) and low income (F=16.39, p<.0001) were associated with adherence levels. Table 3 shows that syndemics count has a by-level effect on adherence, with one syndemic condition significantly predictive of lower adherence (p<.0001) compared to no syndemic conditions; two syndemic conditions significantly predictive of lower adherence compared with one syndemic condition (p<.0001); and three syndemic conditions significantly predictive of lower adherence compared with two syndemic conditions (p<.001). Black MSM (p<.0001), Hispanic MSM (p<.001), and MSM of other race/ethnicities (p<.05) reported lower ART adherence than White MSM.
Table 2.
Analysis results of outcomes in the MACS, sexually active HIV-positive MSM, wave 38-50 (n=766)
| Predictor variables | HIV viral load | Detectable viral load (%) | Adherence scale, since last visit | Syndemics count | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F-value | P | F-value | P | F-value | P | F-value | P | |
| Wave | 2.05 | 0.0170 | 3.47 | <.0001 | 0.55 | 0.8810 | 0.98 | 0.4691 |
| MSMW | 5.52 | 0.0189 | 7.69 | 0.0056 | 1.12 | 0.2900 | 2.00 | 0.1579 |
| Race/ethnicity | 67.75 | <.0001 | 83.88 | <.0001 | 42.58 | <.0001 | 1.33 | 0.2640 |
| Income < $20,000 | 64.04 | <.0001 | 61.67 | <.0001 | 16.39 | <.0001 | 23.50 | <.0001 |
| Age < 40 | 57.58 | <.0001 | 54.37 | <.0001 | 0.05 | 0.8273 | 0.11 | 0.7368 |
| Recent seroconverter | 69.50 | <.0001 | 51.23 | <.0001 | 2.82 | 0.0933 | 0.41 | 0.5226 |
| Syndemics count | 11.39 | <.0001 | 8.56 | <.0001 | 37.75 | <.0001 | - | - |
| Syndemics count*Wave | 1.01 | 0.4461 | 0.86 | 0.7022 | 0.94 | 0.5739 | - | - |
Table 3.
Least-square means group comparisons of viral load and adherence by syndemics count groups (n=766 for all columns, except adherence count, where n=712)
| Predictor variables | HIV viral load†‡ | Detectable viral load (%)† | Adherence scale (1-4)† | Syndemics count† |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Black, non-Hispanic | 635.04 copies/mL**** | 57.0%**** | 1.9768**** | 1.2978** |
| Hispanic | 247.86 copies/mL**** | 35.4%** | 1.7550*** | 1.2849 |
| Other | 146.89 copies/mL | 27.9% | 1.8832* | 1.1288 |
| White, non-Hispanic | 153.43 copies/mL | 29.0% | 1.6589 | 1.2423 |
| MSMW | 314.56 copies/mL* | 43.9%** | 1.8051 | 1.3031 |
| MSMO | 231.10 copies/mL | 36.7% | 1.7578 | 1.2950 |
| Recent seroconverter | 5468.90 copies/mL**** | 83.1%**** | 1.5165 | 1.3046 |
| Non-recent seroconverter | 229.46 copies/mL | 36.7% | 1.7637 | 1.2613 |
| Age<40 | 460.57 copies/mL**** | 49.6%**** | 1.7681 | 1.2550 |
| Age 40 and older | 214.34 copies/mL | 35.4% | 1.7597 | 1.2628 |
| Income <$20,000 | 343.95 copies/mL**** | 44.2%**** | 1.8140**** | 1.3163**** |
| Income≥$20,000 | 190.94 copies/mL | 33.3% | 1.7304 | 1.2309 |
| Syndemics count=0 | 191.34 copies/mL | 33.5% | 1.6649 | - |
| Syndemics count=1 | 247.69 copies/mL*** | 38.3%*** | 1.7981**** | - |
| Syndemics count=2 | 376.44 copies/mL*** | 44.5%* | 1.9444**** | - |
| Syndemics count=3 | 1197.02 copies/mL** | 65.8%** | 2.3859*** | - |
All means adjusted for racial/ethnic minority status, annual income < $20,000, age <40, wave, MSMW status, and recent seroconversion. Least-square means estimate comparisons by syndemic count adjusted for multiplicity and heteroscedasticity using the studentized maximum modular (SMM) approach, using observed margins for means estimates with a by-level estimation approach for multiple comparisons. Significance values for syndemics count are compared to preceding category variable. Significance values for race/ethnicity are compared with white race.
HIV viral loads re-transformed post-analysis from log10 values.
P-value <.05.
P-value <.01.
P-value <.001.
P-value <.0001.
HIV viral load
Table 2 shows that syndemics count was highly associated with HIV viral load (F=11.39, p<.0001), along with bisexual behavior (F=5.52, p<.05), wave (F=2.05, p<.05), racial/ethnic minority status (F=67.75, p<.0001), lower income (F=64.04, p<.0001), younger age (F=57.58, p<.0001), and recent sero-conversion (F=69.50, p<.0001). While viral load levels decreased over time (F=2.05, p<.05), trajectories were not associated with syndemics count (F=1.01, p=0.45). Table 3 shows that syndemics count has an increasing effect on HIV viral load least-squares means, by level, at a given observation. One syndemic condition (247.69 copies/mL3) was significantly predictive of higher viral load values (p<.001) compared with no syndemic conditions (191.34 copies/mL3); two syndemic conditions (376.44 copies/mL3) significantly predicted (p<.001) higher viral load values compared with one syndemic condition; and three syndemic conditions (1197.02 copies/mL3) significantly predicted higher viral load values compared with two syndemic conditions (p<.01). Black and Hispanic MSM had significantly higher viral load levels at a given observation than White MSM (635.04 copies/mL3 vs. 247.86 copies/mL vs. 153.43 copies/mL3, respectively; p <.0001).
Proportion of sample with detectable virus
Table 2 shows that the proportion of HIV-positive MSM who had detectable viral loads was associated with syndemics count (F=8.56, p<.0001). The proportion of this sample with detectable viral loads decreased significantly over time (F=3.47, p<.0001); trajectories of this decrease were not significantly different by syndemics count (F=0.86, p=.70), as illustrated in Fig. 2. Table 3 shows that, at a given observation, the likelihood (least-squares means estimated proportions) of having detectable viral load increased with syndemics count. MSM with no syndemic conditions were less likely to have detectable virus than MSM with one syndemic condition (33.5% vs. 38.3%; p<.001); MSM with two syndemic conditions were more likely than MSM with one syndemic condition to have detectable virus (44.5% vs. 38.3%; p<.05); and MSM with three syndemic conditions were more likely to have detectable virus than MSM with two syndemic conditions (65.8% vs. 44.5%; p<.01). Relative to White MSM, Black MSM (57.0% vs. 29.0%; p<.0001) and Hispanic MSM (35.4% vs. 29.0%; p<.01) were significantly more likely to have detectable viral loads. Bisexually-behaving MSM were more likely to have detectable viral load than other MSM (43.9% vs. 36.7%; p<.01); younger MSM were more likely to have detectable viral load than MSM age 40 and older (49.6% vs. 35.4%; p<.0001); lower income MSM were more likely to have detectable viral load than higher income MSM (44.2% vs. 33.3; p<.0001); and recent sero-converters had greater likelihood of detectable viral load (83.1% vs. 36.7%, p<.0001).
Figure 2.
Regressed least-squares means proportions of HIV-positive MSM with detectable HIV viral load by syndemics count, waves 38-50.
Syndemics count by socio-demographic characteristics
Table 2 shows that, of sociodemographic covariate classes, only lower income status was associated with syndemics count (p<.0001); syndemics count did not change significantly over time (F=0.98, p=.47). Table 3 shows that, within race/ethnicity classifications, Black MSM experienced higher estimated means of syndemics count compared to White MSM (1.30 vs. 1.24; p<.01) at a given observation.
Mediation analyses
Figure 1 shows that, at each study visit assessed, higher syndemics count was associated with lower ART adherence (all p-values<.01) and that, in 10 of 13 visits, lower adherence was significantly associated with higher HIV viral load. In 9 of 13 visits, syndemics count was significantly associated with higher HIV viral load; and in 11 of 13 visits, there was a significant indirect (mediating) effect of adherence on the relationship between syndemics count and HIV viral load. Table 4 shows that the overall mediating effect of adherence on this relationship across visits was significant, estimated to be 32.3% (95% CI: 5.3%--59.2%; p<.05). Nonetheless, even in an adherence-adjusted model, syndemics count was significantly and positively associated with HIV viral load (β=0.03, p<.05).
Figure 1.
Modified cross-lagged panel model (CLPM) with total and indirect effects between syndemics count, HIV medication adherence, and log10 viral load in the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study, visits 38-50 (n=712).
Table 4.
Mediation of relationship between syndemics count and HIV viral load by HIV medication adherence (n=712)
| Viral load (log10) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Predictors and covariates | Base model | Adherence-adjusted model | |||
| β (SE β) | p | β (SE β) | p | Proportion of effect mediated by adherence % (p) | |
| Syndemics count | 0.05 (0.01) | 0.0007 | 0.03 (0.02) | 0.03 | 32.3% (.02) |
| HIV medication adherence | -- | -- | 0.08 (0.02) | <0.0001 | -- |
| MSMW | 0.13 (0.06) | 0.048 | 0.12 (0.06) | 0.049 | -- |
| Minority race/ethnicity | 0.09 (0.03) | 0.0009 | 0.10 (0.03) | 0.004 | -- |
| Annual income <$20,000 | 0.12 (0.03) | <0.0001 | 0.10 (0.03) | 0.0008 | -- |
| Recent seroconversion | 0.06 (0.07) | 0.41 | 0.21 (0.07) | 0.005 | -- |
Interrelatedness of syndemics count variables
Table 5 shows that, longitudinally and adjusting for covariates, polysubstance use was significantly correlated with depression symptoms (F=34.19, p<.0001) and UAI (F=69.76, p<.0001); depression symptoms were significantly correlated with polysubstance use (F=32.41, p<.0001) and UAI (F=25.14, p<.0001); and UAI was significantly associated with polysubstance use (F=66.57, p<.0001) and depression symptoms (F=24.44, p<.0001).
Table 5.
Analysis results of syndemic components in the MACS, sexually active HIV-positive MSM, wave 38-50 (n=766)
| Predictor variables | Polysubstance use | CES-D>15 | Condomless anal sex | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | p-value | F | p-value | F | p-value | |
| Wave | 2.04 | 0.0174 | 1.24 | 0.2454 | 0.49 | 0.9214 |
| MSMW | 12.07 | 0.0005 | 1.54 | 0.2152 | 0.25 | 0.6187 |
| Minority race/ethnicity | 2.55 | 0.1102 | 11.98 | 0.0005 | 34.83 | <.0001 |
| Income < $20,000 | 17.31 | <.0001 | 194.48 | <.0001 | 33.54 | <.0001 |
| Age < 40 | 17.52 | <.0001 | 0.72 | 0.3946 | 9.52 | 0.0020 |
| Polysubstance use | -- | -- | 32.41 | <.0001 | 66.57 | <.0001 |
| CES-D ≥ 16 | 34.19 | <.0001 | -- | -- | 24.44 | <.0001 |
| Condomless anal sex (UAI) | 69.76 | <.0001 | 25.14 | <.0001 | -- | -- |
DISCUSSION
Our findings provide robust evidence that, within this sample of HIV-positive MSM, higher HIV viral load and lower ART adherence are, respectively, associated with increased syndemics count. These findings indicate that combinations of depression symptoms, polysubstance use, and sexual risk behavior function as profound barriers to fully reaping the benefits of successful HIV care and that, as these conditions snowball, their impact on HIV outcomes is exacerbated. These results may have epidemiological implications: every increase in the number of concomitant syndemics is associated with higher HIV viral load and, therefore, higher transmission potential. Our finding that adherence significantly but incompletely mediates the effect of syndemics on viral load suggests that the pathway to consistent viral suppression is, for many individuals, complex, and that the concomitant effects of polysubstance use, depression symptoms, and risky sexual behavior may play a role above and beyond their association with ART adherence. It is possible that this finding, in particular, is an artifact of the potential reliability and validity errors associated with our ART adherence measure; or that MSM who are depressed, use illegal substances, and/or have risky sexual behavior are more predisposed to social desirability bias or poorer recall when responding to adherence questions. Other factors we were unable to assess, such as lower retention in care and inconsistent ART regimen monitoring, may occur more frequently among MSM with higher syndemics counts. It is also possible that some latent biological effect exists: other research has shown that methamphetamine and other stimulant drug use may increase viral replication and/or have immunological effects on viral suppression [24, 38]. In the larger context of HIV viral load suppression, these findings suggest that solely biomedical interventions may be less than sufficient for optimal treatment, especially within the newly predominant Treatment as Prevention (TasP) model [39]. Our findings provide support for integrating structural and behavioral approaches to address syndemics among MSM receiving HIV care in the U.S.
These results also contribute to establishing the relevance of Syndemics Theory for MSM, adding additional behavioral (adherence) and biomedical (viral load suppression) endpoints to the model and providing empirical evidence of syndemics’ predictive properties in association with HIV outcomes. Syndemics have been repeatedly shown to correspond with HIV risk behavior among HIV-negative MSM; we now see that syndemics impact HIV treatment outcomes among HIV-positive MSM. In addition, our findings support the concept of syndemics as closely intertwined psychosocial conditions whose overall effect on health increases at each level of their combination.
It is of particular concern that men who have sex with men and women (MSMW) and racial/ethnic minority MSM experience higher levels of viral load even in models that control for syndemics. HIV-positive MSMW were not found to experience higher syndemics count or lower ART adherence in these models; however, it is possible that their small sample size (n=48) limited our ability to identify distinctions: previous research has indicated that MSMW report disparate levels of depression symptoms and polysubstance use compared with other MSM [32, 40]. Our findings on disparities among HIV-positive racial/ethnic minority MSM, especially Black MSM, are very stark: compared with White MSM, they had higher viral loads; higher rates of detectable viral loads; reported lower ART adherence; and reported higher syndemics counts. This suggests that health care systems must be more attentive to possibilities of treatment failure among HIV-positive racial/ethnic minority MSM above and beyond standard intervention approaches, providing further support for recommendations to develop structural interventions designed to assist HIV-positive Black MSM in managing the pressures of dual identities and familial and social stressors [12].
The current battery of HIV interventions aimed at MSM, many of which focus on substance use or depression or sexual risk, often in exclusion, have been shown to have minimal if any long-term benefit [41]. Our findings suggest that a TasP approach that factors in the syndemic array of psychosocial and behavioral conditions and the social adversities that promote them may be more salient for MSM, indicating a need for a continuum-of-care approach to HIV care among MSM, one that includes regular mental health and substance use screenings and treatment, and sexual risk prevention to reduce rates of secondary transmission and acquisition of other STIs [42-44]. Models that also provide ancillary services, for example dedicated housing for active substance-using HIV-positive MSM or those of lower socio-economic status, have been shown to positively impact viral load suppression [45]. If applied across HIV treatment cascade levels such as linkage to and retention in care, a continuum-of-care “best-practices” model should facilitate optimal HIV treatment results by attending to these psychosocial factors so strongly associated with both poor adherence and biomedical outcomes.
This study has several important limitations. First, while the MACS provides an opportunity to analyze viral load suppression, ART adherence, and syndemics over time, the sample is over-represented by older MSM; as such, findings may not be generalizable to younger samples, where risk of HIV infection is highest [3]. Second, men who agreed to participate in the Methamphetamine Sub-Study may have important differences from men who declined to participate, and thus may not be generalizable to the larger MACS sample. As is the case with many cohort studies, measures were subject to missing data from incomplete sections or skipped visits. We were only able to include three longitudinally measured syndemic conditions; other conditions that were not measured longitudinally, such as sexual compulsivity [46], transactional sex engagement [40, 47], and intimate partner violence [11] might provide more comprehensive syndemics measures. Other studies have indicated that measures we have used, such as self-reported adherence, are subject to recall and response biases [48]. However, the robustness of our findings using conservative statistical models and a model subject population (who, as a result of their participation, obtain free lab values every six months, as well as linkage to care beyond research study confines), indicate that our results may well underestimate the variance in adherence and viral load suppression contributed by syndemics in the larger population of sexually active, HIV-positive MSM in the U.S.
In the fourth decade of the U.S. HIV/AIDS epidemic, we remain challenged at a population level by rising HIV incidence rates among MSM and fractional treatment success . The findings we have presented demonstrate that the TasP model will only succeed if it includes a combination of prevention approaches. Reliance on pharmacology alone will be as unsuccessful as relying solely on behavioral or structural strategies alone: a bottle of pills, no matter their efficacy, will be ineffective given the near-perfect adherence that practitioners expect from populations who continue to experience profound psychosocial barriers. We strongly recommend the diffusion of HIV clinical care models that provide highly connected, preferably internally delivered mental health, sexual risk behavior prevention, and substance use treatment to optimize viral load suppression among HIV-positive MSM.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We are indebted to the anonymous referees, whose valuable comments have strengthened this manuscript; and to Andrew Hayes, PhD, for his advice in mediation modeling. Data in this manuscript were collected by the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study (MACS). The contents of this publication are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health (NIH). MACS (Principal Investigators): Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health (Joseph Margolick), U01-AI35042; Northwestern University (Steven Wolinsky), U01-AI35039; University of California, Los Angeles (Roger Detels), U01-AI35040; University of Pittsburgh (Charles Rinaldo), U01-AI35041; the Center for Analysis and Management of MACS, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health (Lisa Jacobson), UM1-AI35043. The MACS is funded primarily by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), with additional co-funding from the National Cancer Institute (NCI). Targeted supplemental funding for specific projects was also provided by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), and the National Institute on Deafness and Communication Disorders (NIDCD). MACS data collection is also supported by UL1-TR000424 (JHU CTSA).
Footnotes
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
MRF, RS, CW, MP, and AJS designed the analysis. MRF led the manuscript writing, to which RS, SW, MP, AJS, SS, PJS, and LT contributed. MRF, AH, and MP collaborated on post-hoc analyses and manuscript revisions.
REFERENCES
- 1.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [27 February 2015];Epidemiology of HIV through. 2013 http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/pdf/g-l/cdc-hiv-genepislideseries-2013.pdf.
- 2.Stall R, Duran L, Wisniewski SR, Friedman MS, Marshal MP, McFarland W, et al. Running in place: implications of HIV incidence estimates among urban men who have sex with men in the United States and other industrialized countries. AIDS and Behavior. 2009;13:615–629. doi: 10.1007/s10461-008-9509-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Prejean J, Song R, Hernandez A, Ziebell R, Green T, Walker F, et al. Estimated HIV incidence in the United States, 2006–2009. PloS one. 2011;6:e17502. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Millett GA, Peterson JL, Wolitski RJ, Stall R. Greater risk for HIV infection of black men who have sex with men: a critical literature review. Journal Information. 2006:96. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2005.066720. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Millett GA, Peterson JL, Flores SA, Hart TA, Jeffries WL, Wilson PA, et al. Comparisons of disparities and risks of HIV infection in black and other men who have sex with men in Canada, UK, and USA: a meta-analysis. The Lancet. 2012 doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60899-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Leibowitz AA, Parker KB, Rotheram-Borus MJ. A US policy perspective on oral preexposure prophylaxis for HIV. American journal of public health. 2011;101:982. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2010.300066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Gardner EM, McLees MP, Steiner JF, del Rio C, Burman WJ. The spectrum of engagement in HIV care and its relevance to test-and-treat strategies for prevention of HIV infection. Clinical infectious diseases. 2011;52:793–800. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciq243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Das M, Chu PL, Santos G-M, Scheer S, Vittinghoff E, McFarland W, et al. Decreases in community viral load are accompanied by reductions in new HIV infections in San Francisco. PloS one. 2010;5:e11068. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Millett GA, Crowley JS, Koh H, Valdiserri RO, Frieden T, Dieffenbach CW, et al. A way forward: the National HIV/AIDS Strategy and reducing HIV incidence in the United States. JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes. 2010;55:S144–S147. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e3181fbcb04. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Stall R, Friedman M, Catania JA. Interacting epidemics and gay men's health: A theory of syndemic production among urban gay men. Unequal opportunity: Health disparities affecting gay and bisexual men in the United States. 2008:251–274. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Herrick AL, Lim SH, Plankey MW, Chmiel JS, Guadamuz TT, Kao U, et al. Adversity and syndemic production among men participating in the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study: a life-course approach. American journal of public health. 2013;103:79–85. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.300810. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Dyer TP, Shoptaw S, Guadamuz TE, Plankey M, Kao U, Ostrow D, et al. Application of syndemic theory to black men who have sex with men in the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study. Journal of Urban Health. 2012;89:697–708. doi: 10.1007/s11524-012-9674-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kurtz SP. Arrest histories of high-risk gay and bisexual men in Miami: Unexpected additional evidence for syndemic theory. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs. 2008;40:513–521. doi: 10.1080/02791072.2008.10400657. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Marshal MP, Dietz LJ, Friedman MS, Stall R, Smith HA, McGinley J, et al. Suicidality and depression disparities between sexual minority and heterosexual youth: a meta-analytic review. Journal of Adolescent Health. 2011;49:115–123. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2011.02.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Friedman MS, Marshal MP, Guadamuz TE, Wei C, Wong CF, Saewyc EM, et al. A meta-analysis of disparities in childhood sexual abuse, parental physical abuse, and peer victimization among sexual minority and sexual nonminority individuals. American journal of public health. 2011;101:1481. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.190009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Halkitis PN, Moeller RW, Siconolfi DE, Storholm ED, Solomon TM, Bub KL. Measurement model exploring a syndemic in emerging adult gay and bisexual men. AIDS Behav. 2013;17:662–673. doi: 10.1007/s10461-012-0273-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Singer M, Marzuach-Rodriquez L. Applying anthropology to the prevention of AIDS: The latino gay men's health project. Human Organization. 1996;55:141–148. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Singer M, Clair S. Syndemics and Public Health: Reconceptualizing Disease in Bio Social Context. Medical anthropology quarterly. 2003;17:423–441. doi: 10.1525/maq.2003.17.4.423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Stall R, Mills TC, Williamson J, Hart T, Greenwood G, Paul J, et al. Association of co-occurring psychosocial health problems and increased vulnerability to HIV/AIDS among urban men who have sex with men. American journal of public health. 2003;93:939–942. doi: 10.2105/ajph.93.6.939. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Mustanski B, Andrews R, Herrick A, Stall R, Schnarrs PW. A syndemic of psychosocial health disparities and associations with risk for attempting suicide among young sexual minority men. American journal of public health. 2014:e1–e8. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301744. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Plankey MW, Ostrow DG, Stall R, Cox C, Li X, Peck JA, et al. The relationship between methamphetamine and popper use and risk of HIV seroconversion in the multicenter AIDS cohort study. Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) 2007;45:85. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e3180417c99. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Cook JA, Burke-Miller JK, Cohen MH, Cook RL, Vlahov D, Wilson TE, et al. Crack cocaine, disease progression, and mortality in a multi-center cohort of HIV-1 positive women. AIDS (London, England) 2008;22:1355. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e32830507f2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Peterson P, Gekker G, Chao C, Schut R, Molitor T, Balfour H. Cocaine potentiates HIV-1 replication in human peripheral blood mononuclear cell cocultures. Involvement of transforming growth factor-beta. The Journal of Immunology. 1991;146:81–84. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Carrico AW, Johnson MO, Morin SF, Remien RH, Riley ED, Hecht FM, et al. Stimulant use is associated with immune activation and depleted tryptophan among HIV-positive persons on anti-retroviral therapy. Brain, behavior, and immunity. 2008;22:1257–1262. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2008.07.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Hinkin CH, Barclay TR, Castellon SA, Levine AJ, Durvasula RS, Marion SD, et al. Drug use and medication adherence among HIV-1 infected individuals. AIDS and Behavior. 2007;11:185–194. doi: 10.1007/s10461-006-9152-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Shoptaw S, Stall R, Bordon J, Kao U, Cox C, Li X, et al. Cumulative exposure to stimulants and immune function outcomes among HIV-positive and HIV-negative men in the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study. International journal of STD & AIDS. 2012;23:576–580. doi: 10.1258/ijsa.2012.011322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Ironson G, O'Cleirigh C, Fletcher MA, Laurenceau JP, Balbin E, Klimas N, et al. Psychosocial factors predict CD4 and viral load change in men and women with human immunodeficiency virus in the era of highly active antiretroviral treatment. Psychosomatic medicine. 2005;67:1013–1021. doi: 10.1097/01.psy.0000188569.58998.c8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Kleeberger CA, Buechner J, Palella F, Detels R, Riddler S, Godfrey R, et al. Changes in adherence to highly active antiretroviral therapy medications in the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study*. Aids. 2004;18:683–688. doi: 10.1097/00002030-200403050-00013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Starace F, Ammassari A, Trotta MP, Murri R, De Longis P, Izzo C, et al. Depression is a risk factor for suboptimal adherence to highly active antiretroviral therapy. Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) 2002;31:S136–139. doi: 10.1097/00126334-200212153-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.KASLOW RA, OSTROW DG, DETELS R, PHAIR JP, POLK BF, RINALDO CR. The Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study: rationale, organization, and selected characteristics of the participants. American Journal of Epidemiology. 1987;126:310–318. doi: 10.1093/aje/126.2.310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Silvestre AJ, Hylton JB, Johnson LM, Houston C, Witt M, Jacobson L, et al. Recruiting minority men who have sex with men for HIV research: results from a 4-city campaign. Journal Information. 2006:96. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2005.072801. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Friedman MR, Stall R, Silvestre AJ, Mustanski B, Shoptaw S, Surkan PJ, et al. Stuck in the middle: longitudinal HIV-related health disparities among men who have sex with men and women. JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes. 2014;66:213–220. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000000143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Kleeberger CA, Phair JP, Strathdee SA, Detels R, Kingsley L, Jacobson LP. Determinants of heterogeneous adherence to HIV-antiretroviral therapies in the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study. JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes. 2001;26:82–92. doi: 10.1097/00126334-200101010-00012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Radloff LS. The CES-D scale a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied psychological measurement. 1977;1:385–401. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Radloff LS, Rae DS. Susceptibility and precipitating factors in depression: sex differences and similarities. Journal of Abnormal Psychology. 1979;88:174. doi: 10.1037//0021-843x.88.2.174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Preacher KJ. Advances in Mediation Analysis: A Survey and Synthesis of New Developments. Annual Review of Psychology. 2014:66. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Jun H-J, Austin SB, Wylie SA, Corliss HL, Jackson B, Spiegelman D, et al. The mediating effect of childhood abuse in sexual orientation disparities in tobacco and alcohol use during adolescence: Results from the Nurses’ Health Study II. Cancer Causes & Control. 2010;21:1817–1828. doi: 10.1007/s10552-010-9609-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Ellis RJ, Childers ME, Cherner M, Lazzaretto D, Letendre S. Increased human immunodeficiency virus loads in active methamphetamine users are explained by reduced effectiveness of antiretroviral therapy. Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2003;188:1820–1826. doi: 10.1086/379894. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Smith K, Powers KA, Kashuba AD, Cohen MS. HIV-1 treatment as prevention: the good, the bad, and the challenges. Current Opinion in HIV and AIDS. 2011;6:315. doi: 10.1097/COH.0b013e32834788e7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Friedman MR, Kurtz SP, Buttram ME, Wei C, Silvestre AJ, Stall R. HIV Risk Among Substance-Using Men Who Have Sex with Men and Women (MSMW): Findings from South Florida. AIDS and Behavior. 2013:1–9. doi: 10.1007/s10461-013-0495-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Sullivan PS, Carballo-Diéguez A, Coates T, Goodreau SM, McGowan I, Sanders EJ, et al. Successes and challenges of HIV prevention in men who have sex with men. The Lancet. 2012;380:388–399. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60955-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Halkitis PN, Kupprat SA, Hampton MB, Perez Figueroa R, Kingdon M, Eddy JA, et al. EVIDENCE FOR A SYNDEMIC IN AGING HIV POSITIVE GAY, BISEXUAL, AND OTHER MSM: IMPLICATIONS FOR A HOLISTIC APPROACH TO PREVENTION AND HEALTH CARE. Annals of Anthropological Practice. 2012;36:365–386. doi: 10.1111/napa.12009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Bouis S, Reif S, Whetten K, Scovil J, Murray A, Swartz M. An integrated, multidimensional treatment model for individuals living with HIV, mental illness, and substance abuse. Health & social work. 2007;32:268–278. doi: 10.1093/hsw/32.4.268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Mayer KH, Stone VE. Strategies for optimizing adherence to highly active antiretroviral therapy: lessons from research and clinical practice. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2001;33:865–872. doi: 10.1086/322698. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Hawk M, Davis D. The effects of a harm reduction housing program on the viral loads of homeless individuals living with HIV/AIDS. AIDS care. 2012;24:577–582. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2011.630352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Parsons JT, Grov C, Golub SA. Sexual compulsivity, co-occurring psychosocial health problems, and HIV risk among gay and bisexual men: Further evidence of a syndemic. Journal Information. 2012:102. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Stall R FM, Buttram ME, Kurtz SP. Party, play and pay: associations between transactional sex and high-risk UAI among substance-using MSM in South Florida.. 19th International AIDS Conference; Washington, D.C.. 2012. [Google Scholar]
- 48.Marrazzo J, Ramjee G, Nair G, Palanee T, Mkhize B, Nakabiito C. Pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV in women: daily oral tenofovir, oral tenofovir/emtricitabine, or vaginal tenofovir gel in the VOICE Study (MTN 003).. 20th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic infections; 2013. [Google Scholar]


