Skip to main content
Plant Physiology logoLink to Plant Physiology
. 2015 Jun 1;168(3):804–807. doi: 10.1104/pp.15.00223

Extreme Aridity Pushes Trees to Their Physical Limits1

Maximilian Larter 1,2,3,4,5, Tim J Brodribb 1,2,3,4,5, Sebastian Pfautsch 1,2,3,4,5, Régis Burlett 1,2,3,4,5, Hervé Cochard 1,2,3,4,5, Sylvain Delzon 1,2,3,4,5,*
PMCID: PMC4741339  PMID: 26034263

Abstract

An Australian desert tree species displays record drought tolerance, bringing it remarkably close to the practical limit for liquid water transport in vascular plants.


Drought-induced hydraulic failure is a leading cause of mortality of trees (McDowell et al., 2008; Anderegg et al., 2012) and has become a major concern in light of future climate predictions, with forests across the world showing signs of vulnerability to intense and prolonged drought events (Allen et al., 2010). We show here that Callitris tuberculata, a conifer species from extremely dry areas of Western Australia, is the most cavitation-resistant tree species in the world to date (mean xylem pressure leading to 50% loss of hydraulic function [P50] = −18.8 MPa). Hydraulic conductance is maintained in these plants at pressures remarkably close to the practical limit of water metastability, suggesting that liquid water transport under the cohesion-tension theory has reached its operational boundary.

Coping with desiccation is one of the greatest challenges faced by plant life on land, and the evolution of specialized tissue for the transport of water played a key role in the colonization of continents (Black and Pritchard, 2002; Sperry, 2003). As well as evolving mechanisms to reduce water loss (e.g. stomata and waxy leaf surfaces), land plants also have to provide their aerial organs with water to fuel photosynthesis, supply metabolism, and control leaf temperature through transpiration, even when water availability is low. Driven by competition for limited resources, plants have perfected their vascular systems over hundreds of millions of years, enabling vertical transport of water to heights in excess of 100 m above the ground and resulting in the dominance of trees across a wide range of terrestrial ecosystems. However, trees are excluded from extremely dry and cold climates; we propose here that an absolute limit for water transport in trees exists, set by the physical properties of liquid water, restricting the existence of woody nonsucculent trees in dry deserts.

The movement of water against gravity in trees is driven by a remarkably simple process, described by the tension-cohesion theory (Tyree and Sperry, 1989; Tyree, 1997; Sperry, 2003). Evaporation at the leaf surface causes water in the plant to move up through a specialized transport tissue and drives water uptake from the soil. This leads water in the xylem to be stretched at negative pressures. However, cohesive forces due to hydrogen bonds bind water molecules together and also onto cell walls, sufficiently to maintain water in a liquid yet metastable state prone to sudden vaporization by cavitation. In moist soils, these pressures are moderate, typically above −2 MPa, but during drought, they decrease considerably, as plants are forced to extract water from drying soil, which reduces the stability of the water column. Below a specific pressure threshold, cavitation events occur when air-water menisci located at pores between xylem conduits break (Tyree, 1997; Cochard et al., 2009; Mayr et al., 2014), vaporizing sap, reducing xylem conductance, and eventually leading to plant death by desiccation (Brodribb et al., 2010; Urli et al., 2013). The xylem pressure at which cavitation occurs, leading to 50% loss of hydraulic function (P50), is a trait that varies widely across species (Delzon et al., 2010; Bouche et al., 2014) and links with climate: xeric species are more resistant to cavitation than species that occupy more mesic habitats (Brodribb and Hill, 1999; Maherali et al., 2004; Choat et al., 2012; Pittermann et al., 2012). Conifers are generally more resistant to cavitation than angiosperms (Maherali et al., 2004; Choat et al., 2012), likely due to the presence of a pressure-activated safety valve that reduces the spread of air between xylem cells (Bouche et al., 2014). The most cavitation-resistant trees known to date are conifers of the genus Callitris from Australia and New Caledonia, in particular Callitris columellaris, displaying a P50 of −16 MPa (Brodribb et al., 2010). Here, we present the record cavitation resistance of Callitris tuberculata (Cupressaceae; Fig. 1; Supplemental Materials and Methods S1). This tree species is common in extremely arid ecosystems of southwestern Australia, where its range stretches far into the Great Victoria Desert (Fig. 1B). In this area, the climate is dry and hot, with most rainfall occurring during a short wet season (Supplemental Fig. S1). At its most extreme margin, the average annual rainfall is below 180 mm, and annual evapotranspiration can exceed rainfall 10 times, presumably making this species one of the most drought-tolerant trees in the world.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

C. tuberculata appearance, distribution range, and climate. A, C. tuberculata from the sampled population near Lake Grace in Western Australia. The inset shows a close-up view of the tuberculate female cones of this species (photograph by A. Wesolowski). B, Map of Australia showing C. tuberculata’s distribution (hatched area; the red star is the sampling location). Background colors represent mean annual precipitations. The inset at top left shows annual rainfall and temperature anomalies over the 20th century compared with the average (1961–1990) for southwestern Australia. Red bars highlight hot and/or dry years, and the black line indicates the 10-year moving average.

Our results show that this species from the desert tree line produces a previously unparalleled P50 of −18.8 ± 0.6 MPa (n = 9; Fig. 2; Supplemental Fig. S2; Supplemental Table S1), making it, to our knowledge, the most drought-resistant tree ever measured. At −21 MPa, the lowest pressure we could achieve with our device (thus extending the experimental xylem pressure range by nearly 20%, from −17.3 MPa; Brodribb et al., 2010), around 25% to 50% of xylem conduits were still functional, with the final cavitation events predicted to occur at about −25 MPa. Could evolution push xylem pressure to more extreme values to enable this species to colonize even drier habitats? Strikingly, physics’ answer is no, as C. tuberculata has reached the operational limit of water metastability.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Vulnerability curve for C. tuberculata. Points show average loss of conductance ± se for 15 pressure classes across all individuals. The black line is the Pammenter model for the species average P50 (white star) and slope; the gray shaded area shows 95% confidence limits for the mean. The orange vertical line represents the maximum speed of the centrifuge. The red dashed curves and the red shaded area show bulk cavitation probability curves at 20°C, 30°C, and 40°C (from left to right). Box plots show the distribution of published P50 values for 384 angiosperm species (light blue) and 160 gymnosperm species (green). Outliers are detailed in the inset at top right.

According to the classical nucleation theory (Debenedetti, 1996), homogenous water cavitation occurs at pressures below −120 MPa at ambient temperature, as has been verified by experiments using microscopic liquid water inclusions in quartz (Zheng et al., 1991; Azouzi et al., 2013). Conversely, other experimental data suggest that bulk cavitation occurs heterogenously on ubiquitous impurities at much higher pressures, from −20 to −30 MPa, depending on the method used to induce negative pressure, water purity, and water temperature (for review, see Caupin et al., 2012). Consistently, in recent experiments based on a synthetic tree (Wheeler and Stroock, 2008; Vincent et al., 2012), bulk cavitation occurs rapidly at tensions of around −22 MPa. The presence of impurities, dissolved minerals, and nutrients in xylem sap (Buhtz et al., 2004; Krishnan et al., 2011) leads us to speculate that bulk cavitation in tree xylem will likely occur at similar pressures, setting an absolute physical limit for water transport in trees during drought.

Drought stress has pushed this species to evolve the most resistant xylem, to the point that C. tuberculata is able to potentially maintain water flow up to the limit of physical properties of liquid water. Already growing in an environment severely limited by water availability, its adaptation to future conditions (i.e. by lowering P50) may be restricted by reaching this physical boundary. Indeed, in southwestern Australia, a strong trend toward a drier and warmer climate has been evidenced over the 20th century (Fig. 1B, inset). This could lead to a contraction of forest at the desert margin, but it also offers the possibility of a range expansion into historically wetter regions to the southwest.

Hydraulic failure is one of the main hypotheses to explain tree death following prolonged periods of drought (Anderegg et al., 2012). Experiments have shown that, after reaching cavitation levels of around 50% in conifers or 90% in angiosperms, trees cannot recover (Brodribb et al., 2010; Urli et al., 2013). Furthermore, a recent study showed that trees in all ecosystems function with similarly narrow safety margins regarding this threshold to cavitation (Choat et al., 2012). Like southwestern Australia, many regions are projected to suffer from increasingly frequent and severe droughts (Stocker et al., 2013), highlighting the need to better understand the physiological responses of trees to drought stress to improve predictions of the impact of climate change on forests and woodlands. Our results suggest that C. tuberculata is an ideal candidate for further investigations, for example into xylem anatomy modifications allowing the evolution of increased cavitation resistance. Evolution toward xylem safety from cavitation leads to a tolerance strategy, allowing plants to maintain limited function even in stressed conditions. We have discovered an absolute limit to this evolutionary path due to water metastability in the xylem, explaining why trees tend to be excluded from the most arid ecosystems.

Supplemental Data

The following supplemental materials are available.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental Data

Glossary

P50

mean xylem pressure leading to 50% loss of hydraulic function

Footnotes

1

This work was supported by the French National Research Agency in the framework of the Investments for the Future Program within the COTE Cluster of Excellence (grant no. ANR–10–LABX–45) and by the Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment, University of Western Sydney, through its Research Exchange Program.

References

  1. Allen CD, Macalady AK, Chenchouni H, Bachelet D, McDowell N, Vennetier M, Kitzberger T, Rigling A, Breshears DD, Hogg EH, et al. (2010) A global overview of drought and heat-induced tree mortality reveals emerging climate change risks for forests. For Ecol Manage 259: 660–684 [Google Scholar]
  2. Anderegg WR, Berry JA, Smith DD, Sperry JS, Anderegg LD, Field CB (2012) The roles of hydraulic and carbon stress in a widespread climate-induced forest die-off. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109: 233–237 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Azouzi ME, Ramboz C, Lenain JF, Caupin F (2013) A coherent picture of water at extreme negative pressure. Nat Phys 9: 38–41 [Google Scholar]
  4. Black M, Pritchard HW. , editors (2002) Desiccation and Survival in Plants: Drying without Dying. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK [Google Scholar]
  5. Bouche PS, Larter M, Domec JC, Burlett R, Gasson P, Jansen S, Delzon S (2014) A broad survey of hydraulic and mechanical safety in the xylem of conifers. J Exp Bot 65: 4419–4431 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Brodribb T, Hill RS (1999) The importance of xylem constraints in the distribution of conifer species. New Phytol 143: 365–372 [Google Scholar]
  7. Brodribb TJ, Bowman DJ, Nichols S, Delzon S, Burlett R (2010) Xylem function and growth rate interact to determine recovery rates after exposure to extreme water deficit. New Phytol 188: 533–542 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Buhtz A, Kolasa A, Arlt K, Walz C, Kehr J (2004) Xylem sap protein composition is conserved among different plant species. Planta 219: 610–618 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Caupin F, Arvengas A, Davitt K, Azouzi MM, Shmulovich KI, Ramboz C, Sessoms DA, Stroock AD (2012) Exploring water and other liquids at negative pressure. J Phys Condens Matter 24: 284110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Choat B, Jansen S, Brodribb TJ, Cochard H, Delzon S, Bhaskar R, Bucci SJ, Feild TS, Gleason SM, Hacke UG, et al. (2012) Global convergence in the vulnerability of forests to drought. Nature 491: 752–755 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Cochard H, Hölttä T, Herbette S, Delzon S, Mencuccini M (2009) New insights into the mechanisms of water-stress-induced cavitation in conifers. Plant Physiol 151: 949–954 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Debenedetti PG. (1996) Metastable Liquids: Concepts and Principles. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ [Google Scholar]
  13. Delzon S, Douthe C, Sala A, Cochard H (2010) Mechanism of water-stress induced cavitation in conifers: bordered pit structure and function support the hypothesis of seal capillary-seeding. Plant Cell Environ 33: 2101–2111 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Krishnan HB, Natarajan SS, Bennett JO, Sicher RC (2011) Protein and metabolite composition of xylem sap from field-grown soybeans (Glycine max). Planta 233: 921–931 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Maherali H, Pockman WT, Jackson RB (2004) Adaptive variation in the vulnerability of woody plants to xylem cavitation. Ecology 85: 2184–2199 [Google Scholar]
  16. Mayr S, Kartusch B, Kikuta S (2014) Evidence for air-seeding: watching the formation of embolism in conifer xylem. J Plant Hydraul 1: e-0004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. McDowell N, Pockman WT, Allen CD, Breshears DD, Cobb N, Kolb T, Plaut J, Sperry J, West A, Williams DG, et al. (2008) Mechanisms of plant survival and mortality during drought: why do some plants survive while others succumb to drought? New Phytol 178: 719–739 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Pittermann J, Stuart SA, Dawson TE, Moreau A (2012) Cenozoic climate change shaped the evolutionary ecophysiology of the Cupressaceae conifers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109: 9647–9652 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Sperry JS. (2003) Evolution of water transport and xylem structure. Int J Plant Sci 164: S115–S127 [Google Scholar]
  20. Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner GK, Tignor MM, Allen SK, Boschung J, Nauels A, Xia Y, Bex V, Midgley PM (2013) IPCC, 2013: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK [Google Scholar]
  21. Tyree MT. (1997) The cohesion-tension theory of sap ascent: current controversies. J Exp Bot 48: 1753–1765 [Google Scholar]
  22. Tyree MT, Sperry JS (1989) Vulnerability of xylem to cavitation and embolism. Annu Rev Plant Biol 40: 19–36 [Google Scholar]
  23. Urli M, Porté AJ, Cochard H, Guengant Y, Burlett R, Delzon S (2013) Xylem embolism threshold for catastrophic hydraulic failure in angiosperm trees. Tree Physiol 33: 672–683 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Vincent O, Marmottant P, Quinto-Su PA, Ohl CD (2012) Birth and growth of cavitation bubbles within water under tension confined in a simple synthetic tree. Phys Rev Lett 108: 184502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Wheeler TD, Stroock AD (2008) The transpiration of water at negative pressures in a synthetic tree. Nature 455: 208–212 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Zheng Q, Durben DJ, Wolf GH, Angell CA (1991) Liquids at large negative pressures: water at the homogeneous nucleation limit. Science 254: 829–832 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental Data

Articles from Plant Physiology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES