Skip to main content
PMC home page
Oncotarget logoLink to Oncotarget
. 2015 Sep 7;6(31):31368–31377. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.5187

Therapeutic efficacy of tumor-targeting Salmonella typhimurium A1-R on human colorectal cancer liver metastasis in orthotopic nude-mouse models

Takashi Murakami 1,2,3, Yukihiko Hiroshima 1,2,3, Ming Zhao 1, Yong Zhang 1, Takashi Chishima 3, Kuniya Tanaka 3, Michael Bouvet 2, Itaru Endo 3, Robert M Hoffman 1,2
PMCID: PMC4741612  PMID: 26375054

Abstract

Liver metastasis is the most frequent cause of death from colon and other cancers. Generally, liver metastasis is recalcitrant to treatment. The aim of this study is to determine the efficacy of tumor-targeting Salmonella typhimurium A1-R on liver metastasis in orthotopic mouse models. HT-29 human colon cancer cells expressing red fluorescent protein (RFP) were used in the present study. S. typhimurium A1-R infected HT-29 cells in a time-dependent manner, inhibiting cancer-cell proliferation in vitro. S. typhimurium A1-R promoted tumor necrosis and inhibited tumor growth in a subcutaneous tumor mouse model of HT-29-RFP. In orthotopic mouse models, S. typhimurium A1-R targeted liver metastases and significantly reduced their growth. The results of this study demonstrate the future clinical potential of S. typhimurium A1-R targeting of liver metastasis.

Keywords: nude mice, orthotopic, liver metastasis, red fluorescent protein, Salmonella typhimurium A1-R

INTRODUCTION

Anecdotal records go back hundreds of years describing patients having their cancer go into remission after a bacterial infection [1]. In 1867, the German physician Busch reported that a cancer patient went into remission after contracting erysipelas, now known as Streptococcus pyogenes [2]. Bruns treated a cancer patient in 1888 with S. pyogenes and the tumor regressed [1]. Koch, Pasteur and von Behring recorded that cancer patients infected with S. pyogenes had tumor regression [1].

In the 1890s, William B. Coley of New York Cancer Hospital, which became Sloan-Kettering Memorial Cancer Center, treated cancer patients with S. pyogenes. Coley had excellent results infecting cancer patients with S. pyogenes. Hoption Cann et al. [3] compared Coley's bacterial treatment to current chemotherapy and found the 10-year survival rates of Coley's patients were comparable [4] to current conventional therapies [4].

Malmgren and Flanigan [5] demonstrated that anaerobic bacteria could survive and replicate in necrotic tumor tissue which had low oxygen content. Several other early approaches aimed at utilizing bacteria for cancer therapy in animal models were described [6–16].

The obligate anaerobes Bifidobacterium [17] and Clostridium [18], which replicate only in necrotic areas of tumors, have been tested for cancer therapy in mouse models. Bifidobacterium longum selectively localized in mammary tumors after systemic administration [17]. Spores of Clostridium novyi, without its lethal toxin (C. novyi no toxin [NT]). germinated within necrotic areas of tumors in mice and, in combination with chemotherapy, resulted in hemorrhagic necrosis and tumors regression [18]. Recently, C. novyi-NT was used in a patient with leiomyosarcoma and caused one metastatic lesion to regress [19].

Salmonella typhimurium (S. typhimurium) is a facultative anaerobe which, in contrast to obligate anaerobes, can grow in the viable regions as well as necrotic regions of tumors [20]. S. typhimurium with a lipid A—mutation (msbB) deletion along with purine auxotrophic mutations (purI) had antitumor efficacy in mice [21]. S. typhimurium (VNP20009), with msbB and purI mutations, was relatively safely administered to patients in a Phase I clinical trial on patients with metastatic melanoma and renal carcinoma. Overattenuation perhaps limited efficacy [22].

Liver metastases is the most frequent cause of death of patients with colorectal cancer [23]. Hepatectomy is the most effective treatment for liver metastasis from colorectal cancer, but the recurrence rate is over 50% after resection [24]. In addition, efficacy of chemotherapeutic agents are marginal [25]. Therefore, development of effective treatment for liver metastasis is urgently needed.

The tumor-targeting S. typhimurium A1-R strain developed by our laboratory has high tumor colonization and antitumor efficacy. S. typhimurium A1-R is auxotrophic for leu-arg, which prevents it from mounting a continuous infection in normal tissues. S. typhimurium A1-R was able to inhibit or eradicate primary and metastatic tumors as monotherapy in nude mouse models of prostate [26, 27], breast [28–30], lung [31, 32], pancreatic [33–37], ovarian [38, 39], stomach [40] and cervical cancer [41], as well as sarcoma [42–45] and glioma [46, 47], all of which are highly aggressive tumor models.

The present report demonstrates efficacy of S. typhimurium A1-R on liver metastasis of colon cancer in orthotopic mouse models.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

S. typhimurium A1-R targeted HT-29 colon cancer cells in vitro

S. typhimurium A1-R-GFP infection of HT-29 cells expressing red fluorescent protein (HT-29-RFP) was observed beginning 1 hour after addition of bacteria to the cultures (Figure 1A–1B). At 15 hours after addition, many S. typhimurium A1-R-GFP cells were observed inside the HT-29 cancer cells (Figure 1C).

Figure 1. In vitro efficacy of S. typhimurium A1-R-GFP on HT-29-RFP colon cancer cells.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

A–C. Confocal imaging of HT-29-RFP cells with S. typhimurium A1-R-GFP over time with the FV1000 confocal microscope. S. typhimurium A1-R infection of HT-29-RFP cells at one hour after administration (B) At 15 hour after administration, more bacterial cells were visualized in cancer cells (C). Arrows show infecting S. typhimurium A1-R expressing GFP. S. typhimurium A1-R inhibited cell proliferation both in colony area D. and number E. **P < 0.01. Error bars: ± 1 SE. Scale bars: 20 μm (BF, bright-field). The cells in Figures 1A, B and C were chosen as before and after examples of infection with S. typhimurium A1-R-GFP, not to indicate efficacy, which occurs at later times.

S. typhimurium A1-R inhibited HT-29 cancer cell proliferation in vitro

HT-29-RFP cancer cell colonies were significantly reduced by S. typhimurium A1-R-GFP both in area (Figure 1D) and number (Figure 1E) (P < 0.01 for both).

Efficacy of S. typhimurium A1-R on subcutaneous HT-29 tumor growth

Subcutaneous tumor growth was significantly inhibited after the 3rd i.v. administration of S. typhimurium A1-R. The tumor volume ratio at day 22 compared to day 1 in the control group was 6.17 ± 1.16 and 2.68 ± 0.73 in the S. typhimurium A1-R treatment group, P < 0.05 (Figure 2A–2D). Resected specimens showed S. typhimurium A1-R induced more extensive necrosis in the tumors compared to those without treatment (Figure 2E–2H).

Figure 2. Efficacy of S. typhimurium A1-R on HT-29-RFP subcutaneous tumor growth.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Subcutaneous tumor models were established by injection of HT-29-RFP cells in the flanks of nude mice. A–C. Upper panels show bright-field images of tumor growth and lower show RFP images of tumor growth obtained with the OV-100 Small Animal Imaging System. An HT-29-RFP subcutaneous tumor in the right flank before treatment (day 1) (A), and after treatment with S. typhimurium A1-R at day 22 (B), HT-29-RFP tumor in the untreated control group at day-22 (C). D. S. typhimurium A1-R administration significantly decreased tumor volume at day-22 compared to no treatment. E–H. Representative histological images of excised tumors. S. typhimurium A1-R treated tumors had scattered necrosis surrounding viable cancer (E), (F). In contrast, untreated tumors had less necrosis (G), (H). (F) and (H) are high-magnification images of (E) and (G), respectively. *P < 0.05. Error bars: ± 1 SE. Arrows show necrotic areas. Scale bars: 20 mm (A) – (C), 500 μm (E) and (G), 200 μm (F) and (H).

Efficacy of S. typhimurium A1-R on orthotopic liver metastasis mouse models

S. typhimurium A1-R-GFP targeted the liver metastasis 3 days after the 2nd i.v. administration of S. typhimurium A1-R (Figure 3). S. typhimurium A1-R treatment significantly suppressed metastatic progression compared to the control group at day 22. The metastasis fluorescent area ratio on day 22 compared to day 1 was 5.69 ± 0.83 in the S. typhimurium A1-R treatment group and 12.96 ± 1.49, in the untreated control group (P < 0.01; Figure 4).

Figure 3. Intravital imaging of tumor-targeting S. typhimurium A1-R in HT-29 liver metastasis.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

S. typhimurium A1-R-GFP was visualized in the HT-29-RFP liver metastases at day 11 (three days after the second administration of S. typhimurium A1-R-GFP). A. Liver metastases were visualized with the OV100. B–D. Confocal imaging with the FV1000 demonstrated S. typhimurium A1-R-GFP targeting the HT-29-RFP liver metastasis. Scale bars: 5 mm (A), and 50 μm (B)–(D).

Figure 4. Efficacy of S. typhimurium A1-R on HT-29-RFP liver metastasis.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

A, B. Upper panels are bright-field and lower panels are RFP images. Images of liver metastasis at day-22. No treatment (control group; A) and treated with S. typhimurium A1-R (S. typhimurium A1-R group; B). C. Bar graphs demonstrates the ratio of tumor fluorescent area at day 22 to day 1. Metastasis growth in the A1-R group was significantly inhibited compared to the untreated control group. **P < 0.01. Scale bars: 5 mm.

The present study demonstrated that tumor-targeting S. typhimurium A1-R has significant efficacy on liver metastasis in orthotopic mouse models, suggesting clinical activity for patients with colorectal liver metastasis. The present study suggests S. typhimurium A1-R may also be useful in the neo-adjuvant setting to reduce the liver metastasis that would make previously inoperable liver metastasis resectable.

Spleen injection selects colon cancer cells which can grow in the liver. However, this leads to multiple metastatic sites, which were harvested to directly implant a single metastases on the liver of additional mice, which was the desired model. Future experiments will treat models with multiple liver metastases with S. typhimurium A1-R.

This is the first study to use S. typhimurium A1-R to treat colon cancer liver metastasis, which occurs at high frequency and is usually the cause of lethality of this disease. The significant efficacy of S. typhimurium A1-R on the liver metastasis was comparable to the efficacy of S. typhimurium A1-R on other tumor types [26–47].

We have previously demonstrated efficacy of S. typhimurium A1-R in combination with anti-angiogenesis therapy in pancreatic cancer mouse models [37]. Future experiments will also test this combination in colon-cancer liver-metastasis models.

S. typhimurium A1-R in combination with chemotherapy was also active against stomach and pancreatic cancer models [35, 40]. Such strategies will also be tested on colon-cancer liver-metastasis in future experiments.

The present study used GFP and RFP to image S. typhimurium A1-R and the cancer cells, respectively, in vitro and in vivo. Genetic reporters have an important advantage over injectable probes in that the label is permanent with genetic reporters. This is important for long-term monitoring of bacterial targeting as well as tumor growth, including metastasis as well as recurrence [48].

Bacteria have numerous advantages over other biological therapy in that bacteria actively invade tumors, even when vascularity is poor and have a large genome to manipulate for effective and selective tumor targeting [2].

Previously developed concepts and strategies of highly selective tumor targeting [49–53] can take advantage of bacterial targeting of tumors.

Tissue-selective therapy focuses on unique properties of normal tissues and how therapy can target a property of a tissue that kills the cancer tissues that arise from the normal tissue without affecting other tissues [49, 54]. S. typhimurium A1-R is an example of tissue-selective therapy.

De-differentiation of a tumor leading to resistance to chemotherapy is a limitation of tissue-selective therapy, since the targeted protein or pathway may no longer be expressed in the de-differentiated tumor [54]. However, S. typhimurium A1-R does not seem to depend on such targets and should be active against de-differentiated tumors. Specific caspase inhibitors may protect normal cells which may not be present in drug-resistant cancer cells and those could provide further protection to normal cells during S. typhimurium A1-R therapy [49, 51]. S. typhimurium A1-R may also be effectively combined with teratogens which could selectively effect cancer cells that are de-differentiated [50]. Since S. typhimurium A1-R can decoy quiescent cancer cells to begin to cycle, S. typhimurium A1-R could be effectively combined with agents which selectively target proliferating cancer cells [52]. In this regard, normal cells could be protected by agents which induce wild type p53 [53].

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cell line

The human colon cancer cell line HT-29 [55, 56] was maintained in DMEM (Irvine Scientific, Irvine, CA) supplemented with heat-inactivated 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Gemini Biologic Products, Calabasas, CA), 2 mM glutamine, 100 units/ml penicillin, 100 μg/ml streptomycin, and 0.25 μg/ml amphotericin B (Life Technologies, Inc., Grand Island, NY). The cells were incubated at 37°C in 5% CO2. Expression of RFP indicated viability.

Establishment of RFP-labeled HT29

The pDsRed-2 vector (Clontech Laboratories Inc., Palo Alto, CA) expressing RFP and neomycin resistance gene were used to transfect HT-29 to stably express RFP. For RFP gene transfection, 25% confluent HT-29 cells were incubated with a mixture of retroviral supernatants of PT67-RFP packaging cells and DMEM for 24 h. Fresh medium was replenished at this time, and cells were allowed to grow in the absence of retrovirus for 12 h. This procedure was repeated until high levels of RFP expression were achieved. Cells were then harvested with trypsin-EDTA and subcultured into selective medium that contained 200 μg/ml G418 (Invitrogen Corp., Carlsbad, CA). The level of G418 was increased to 2, 000 μg/ml stepwise. HT-29 clones expressing high levels of RFP were isolated and were amplified and transferred using conventional culture methods. High RFP-expression clones were subsequently isolated in the absence of G418 for 10 passages to select for stable expression of RFP [55, 57, 58].

Mice

Athymic nu/nu nude mice (AntiCancer Inc., San Diego, CA), 4–6 weeks old, were used in this study. All mouse surgical procedures and imaging were performed with the animals anesthetized by subcutaneous injection of a ketamine mixture (0.02 ml solution of 20 mg/kg ketamine, 15.2 mg/kg xylazine, and 0.48 mg/kg acepromazine maleate). All animal studies were conducted in accordance with the principles and procedures outlined in the National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Animals under Assurance Number A3873-1.

Preparation of S. typhimurium A1-R

GFP-expressing S. typhimurium A1-R bacteria (AntiCancer Inc.,) were grown overnight on LB medium (Fisher Sci., Hanover Park, IL, USA) and then diluted 1:10 in LB medium. Bacteria were harvested at late-log phase, washed with PBS, and then diluted in PBS [28].

Clonogenic assay

HT-29-RFP cells (2.0 × 102) were seeded in 35 mm dishes. S. typhimurium A1-R-GFP (5 × 105 CFU/ml) was added to the cancer cells, which were incubated at 37°C for 40 minutes. The cells were rinsed and cultured in medium containing gentamycin (10 μg/ml). After 9 days culture, the colonies were fixed with methanol and stained with crystal violet. The Image J program v1.49f (National Institutes of Health) was used to quantify the colonies.

Confocal imaging of cancer cells infected by S. typhimurium A1-R

HT-29-RFP cells (4.0 × 104) were seeded in 35 mm dishes. S. typhimurium A1-R-GFP (5 × 105 CFU/ml) was added to the cancer cells, which were incubated at 37°C for 40 minutes. The cells were rinsed and cultured in medium containing gentamycin (10 μg/ml). The interaction between S. typhimurium A1-R expressing GFP and HT-29 cancer cells expressing RFP was imaged in real time by confocal microscopy (Fluoview FV1000, Olympus Corp., Tokyo, japan) [59] before, and 1 hour and 15 hours after administration of S. typhimurium A1-R.

Efficacy of S. typhimurium A1-R on HT-29 subcutaneous tumors

HT-29-RFP cells were harvested by trypsynization and washed with serum-free medium. A cell suspension (2 × 106 cells/100 μl in medium with 50% Matrigel) was injected subcutaneously in the right flank of nude mice. Two weeks after cell injection, established subcutaneous tumors were measured weekly and treated. Fourteen mice were randomized into a control group (n = 7) and an S. typhimurium A1-R treatment group (n = 7). The first treatment day was defined as day 1. Mice in the S. typhimurium A1-R group were treated with S. typhimurium A1-R (5 × 107 CFU/body) 3 times at days 1, 8, and 15. All tumors in both groups were observed weekly with the OV100 Small Animal Imaging System (Olympus) [60] and harvested at day 22 for tissue evaluation. Each tumor was measured individually in each mouse. Tumor volume was calculated with the following formula: Tumor volume = 1/2 × Length × Width2. Treatment efficacy was presented as a ratio of the tumor volume at each time point compared to the tumor volume at the beginning of the treatment. Dosing was determined from efficacy in other tumor models of S. typhimurium A1-R [26–47].

Initial establishment of liver metastases

HT-29-RFP cells were harvested by trypsinization and washed twice with serum-free medium. HT-29-RFP cells (5 × 105 in 50 μl serum-free medium with 50% Matrigel) were injected into the superior and inferior pole of the spleen in nude mice. Three weeks after injection, liver metastases were established (Figure 5A).

Figure 5. Establishment of orthotopic liver metastasis mouse models.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

Upper panels show bright-field images and lower are RFP images. A. Multiple liver metastases were initially established after spleen injection of HT-29-RFP cells in the donor mouse. B. The metastasis were resected and cut into small fragments. C. Single fragments were then orthotopically implanted in the left lobe of the liver in the experimental mice through an incision (arrow). D. Four weeks after implantation, an orthotopic liver metastasis mouse model was established. Scale bars: 3 mm.

Surgical orthotopic implantation of liver metastasis

Liver metastases, as described above, were resected and cut into block (8 mm3) (Figure 5B). A single tumor fragment was orthotopically implanted into the left lobe of the liver in other nude mice (Figure 5C). Four weeks later, liver metastasis were observed at the implanted site (Figure 5D).

Efficacy of S. typhimurium A1-R on liver metastasis

Four weeks after orthotopic implantation of HT-29-RFP to the liver, 10 mice were randomized into 2 groups: untreated control group (weekly, 3 weeks, n = 5) and the S. typhimurium A1-R treatment group (S. typhimurium A1-R, 5 × 107 CFU/body, iv, weekly, 3 weeks, n = 5). The left lobe of the liver with metastasis was exposed before (at day 1) and after treatment (at day 22) for observation with the OV100. The tumor fluorescence area was analyzed with ImageJ software. Treatment efficacy in each mouse was compared as a ratio of the tumor volume at each time point compared to the tumor volume at the beginning of treatment. Liver metastasis in the S. typhimurium A1-R treatment group was imaged with the FV1000 confocal microscope at day 11 to observe S. typhimurium A1-R-GFP targeting the RFP-expressing HT-29 liver metastasis.

Histology of tissue

Fresh tumor samples were fixed in formalin (10%) and embedded in paraffin before sectioning and staining. Tissue sections (3 mm) were deparaffinized in xylene and rehydrated in an ethanol series. Hematoxylin and eosin (H & E) staining was performed according to standard protocols.

Statistical analysis

SPSS statistics version 21.0 was used for all statistical analyses (IBM, New York City, NY, USA). Significant differences for continuous variables were determined using the Mann-Whitney U test. Bar graphs expressed average values and error bar showed SE. A probability value of P ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by National Cancer Institute grant numbers CA132971 and CA142669 and JSPS KAKENHI grant numbers 26830081 to YH, 26462070 to IE and 24592009 to KT. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Footnotes

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

M.Z. and Y.Z. are employees of AntiCancer Inc. T.M., Y.H. and R.M.H. are unsalaried associates of AntiCancer Inc. There are no other competing financial interests.

Dedication

This paper is dedicated to the memory of A.R. Moossa, M.D.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Coley William. Available at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Coley [last accessed 12 December 2013].
  • 2.Forbes NS. Engineering the perfect (bacterial) cancer therapy. Nat Rev Cancer. 2010;10:785–94. doi: 10.1038/nrc2934. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hoption Cann SA, van Netten JP, van Netten C. Dr William Coley and tumour regression: a place in history or in the future. Postgrad Med J. 2003;79:672–80. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Richardson MA, Ramirez T, Russell NC, Moye LA. Coley toxins immunotherapy: a retrospective review. Altern Ther Health Med. 1999;5:42–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Malmgren RA, Flanigan CC. Localization of the vegetative form of Clostridium tetani in mouse tumors following intravenous spore administration. Cancer Res. 1955;15:473–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Gericke D, Engelbart K. Oncolysis by clostridia. II. Experiments on a tumor spectrum with a variety of clostridia in combination with heavy metal. Cancer Res. 1964;24:217–21. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Moese JR, Moese G. Oncolysis by clostridia. I. Activity of Clostridium butyricum (M-55) and other nonpathogenic clostridia against the Ehrlich carcinoma. Cancer Res. 1964;24:212–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Thiele EH, Arison RN, Boxer GE. Oncolysis by clostridia. III. Effects of clostridia and chemotherapeutic agents on rodent tumors. Cancer Res. 1964;24:222–33. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kohwi Y, Imai K, Tamura Z, Hashimoto Y. Antitumor effect of Bifidobacterium infantis in mice. Gan. 1978;69:613–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kimura NT, Taniguchi S, Aoki K, Baba T. Selective localization and growth of Bifidobacterium bifidum in mouse tumors following intravenous administration. Cancer Res. 1980;40:2061–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Fox ME, Lemmon MJ, Mauchline ML, Davis TO, Giaccia AJ, Minton NP, Brown JM. Anaerobic bacteria as a delivery system for cancer gene therapy: in vitro activation of 5-fluorocytosine by genetically engineered clostridia. Gene Ther. 1996;3:173–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Lemmon MJ, Van Zijl P, Fox ME, Mauchline ML, Giaccia AJ, Minton NP, Brown JM. Anaerobic bacteria as a gene delivery system that is controlled by the tumor microenvironment. Gene Ther. 1997;4:791–6. doi: 10.1038/sj.gt.3300468. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Brown JM, Giaccia AJ. The unique physiology of solid tumors: opportunities (and problems) for cancer therapy. Cancer Res. 1998;58:1408–16. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Low KB, Ittensohn M, Le T, Platt J, Sodi S, Amoss M, Ash O, Carmichael E, Chakraborty A, Fischer J, Lin SL, Luo X, Miller SI, Zheng L, King I, Pawelek JM, Bermudes D. Lipid A mutant Salmonella with suppressed virulence and TNFalpha induction retain tumor-targeting in vivo. Nat Biotechnol. 1999;17:37–41. doi: 10.1038/5205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Clairmont C, Lee KC, Pike J, Ittensohn M, Low KB, Pawelek J, Bermudes D, Brecher SM, Margitich D, Turnier J, Li Z, Luo X, King I, Zheng LM. Biodistribution and genetic stability of the novel antitumor agent VNP20009, a genetically modified strain of Salmonella typhimurium. J Infect Dis. 2000;181:1996–2002. doi: 10.1086/315497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Sznol M, Lin SL, Bermudes D, Zheng LM, King I. Use of preferentially replicating bacteria for the treatment of cancer. J Clin Invest. 2000;105:1027–30. doi: 10.1172/JCI9818. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Yazawa K, Fujimori M, Nakamura T, Sasaki T, Amano J, Kano Y, Taniguchi S. Bifidobacterium longum as a delivery system for gene therapy of chemically induced rat mammary tumors. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2001;66:165–70. doi: 10.1023/a:1010644217648. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Dang LH, Bettegowda C, Huso DL, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B. Combination bacteriolytic therapy for the treatment of experimental tumors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;98:15155–60. doi: 10.1073/pnas.251543698. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Roberts NJ, Zhang L, Janku F, Collins A, Bai RY, Staedtke V, Rusk AW, Tung D, Miller M, Roix J, Khanna KV, Murthy R, Benjamin RS, Helgason T, Szvalb AD, Bird JE, Roy-Chowdhuri S, Zhang HH, Qiao Y, Karim B, McDaniel J, Elpiner A, Sahora A, Lachowicz J, Phillips B, Turner A, Klein MK, Post G, Diaz LA, Jr, Riggins GJ, Papadopoulos N, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B, Bettegowda C, Huso DL, Varterasian M, Saha S, Zhou S. Intratumoral injection of Clostridium novyi-NT spores induces antitumor responses. Sci Transl Med. 2014;6:249ra111. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3008982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Pawelek JM, Low KB, Bermudes D. Bacteria as tumour-targeting vectors. Lancet Oncol. 2003;4:548–56. doi: 10.1016/s1470-2045(03)01194-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Pawelek JM, Low KB, Bermudes D. Tumor-targeted Salmonella as a novel anticancer vector. Cancer Res. 1997;57:4537–44. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Toso JF, Gill VJ, Hwu P, Marincola FM, Restifo NP, Schwartzentruber DJ, Sherry RM, Topalian SL, Yang JC, Stock F, Freezer LJ, Morton KE, Seipp C, Haworth L, Mavroukakis S, White D, MacDonald S, Mao J, Sznol M, Rosenberg SA. Phase I study of the intravenous administration of attenuated Salmonella typhimurium to patients with metastatic melanoma. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:142–52. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2002.20.1.142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Rothbarth J, van de Velde CJ. Treatment of liver metastases of colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol. 2005;16:ii144–9. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdi702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.de Jong MC, Pulitano C, Ribero D, Strub J, Mentha G, Schulick RD, Choti MA, Aldrighetti L, Capussotti L, Pawlik TM. Rates and patterns of recurrence following curative intent surgery for colorectal liver metastasis: an international multi-institutional analysis of 1669 patients. Ann Surg. 2009;250:440–8. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b4539b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Zhang W, Song T. The progress in adjuvant therapy after curative resection of liver metastasis from colorectal cancer. Drug Discov Ther. 2014;8:194–20. doi: 10.5582/ddt.2014.01037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Zhao M, Yang M, Li XM, Jiang P, Baranov E, Li S, Xu M, Penman S, Hoffman RM. Tumor-targeting bacterial therapy with amino acid auxotrophs of GFP-expressing Salmonella typhimurium. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:755–60. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0408422102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Zhao M, Geller J, Ma H, Yang M, Penman S, Hoffman RM. Monotherapy with a tumor-targeting mutant of Salmonella typhimurium cures orthotopic metastatic mouse models of human prostate cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104:10170–4. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0703867104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Zhao M, Yang M, Ma H, Li X, Tan X, Li S, Yang Z, Hoffman RM. Targeted therapy with a Salmonella typhimurium leucine-arginine auxotroph cures orthotopic human breast tumors in nude mice. Cancer Res. 2006;66:7647–52. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-0716. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Zhang Y, Tome Y, Suetsugu A, Zhang L, Zhang N, Hoffman RM, Zhao M. Determination of the optimal route of administration of Salmonella typhimurium A1-R to target breast cancer in nude mice. Anticancer Res. 2012;32:2501–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Zhang Y, Miwa S, Zhang N, Hoffman RM, Zhao M. Tumor-targeting Salmonella typhimurium A1-R arrests growth of breast-cancer brain metastasis. Oncotarget. 2015;6:2615–22. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.2811. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Uchugonova A, Zhao M, Zhang Y, Weinigel M, König K, Hoffman RM. Cancer-cell killing by engineered Salmonella imaged by multiphoton tomography in live mice. Anticancer Res. 2012;32:4331–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Liu F, Zhang L, Hoffman RM, Zhao M. Vessel destruction by tumor-targeting Salmonella typhimurium A1-R is enhanced by high tumor vascularity. Cell Cycle. 2010;9:4518–24. doi: 10.4161/cc.9.22.13744. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Nagakura C, Hayashi K, Zhao M, Yamauchi K, Yamamoto N, Tsuchiya H, Tomita K, Bouvet M, Hoffman RM. Efficacy of a genetically-modified Salmonella typhimurium in an orthotopic human pancreatic cancer in nude mice. Anticancer Res. 2009;29:1873–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Yam C, Zhao M, Hayashi K, Ma H, Kishimoto H, McElroy M, Bouvet M, Hoffman RM. Monotherapy with a tumor-targeting mutant of S. typhimurium inhibits liver metastasis in a mouse model of pancreatic cancer. J Surg Res. 2010;164:248–55. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2009.02.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Hiroshima Y, Zhao M, Zhang Y, Maawy A, Hassanein MK, Uehara F, Miwa S, Yano S, Momiyama M, Suetsugu A, Chishima T, Tanaka K, Bouvet M, Endo I, Hoffman RM. Comparison of efficacy of Salmonella typhimurium A1-R and chemotherapy on stem-like and non-stem human pancreatic cancer cells. Cell Cycle. 2013;12:2774–80. doi: 10.4161/cc.25872. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Hiroshima Y, Zhao M, Maawy A, Zhang Y, Katz MH, Fleming JB, Uehara F, Miwa S, Yano S, Momiyama M, Suetsugu A, Chishima T, Tanaka K, Bouvet M, Endo I, Hoffman RM. Efficacy of Salmonella typhimurium A1-R versus chemotherapy on a pancreatic cancer patient-derived orthotopic xenograft (PDOX) J Cell Biochem. 2014;115:1254–61. doi: 10.1002/jcb.24769. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Hiroshima Y, Zhang Y, Murakami T, Maawy AA, Miwa S, Yamamoto M, Yano S, Sato S, Momiyama M, Mori R, Matsuyama R, Chishima T, Tanaka K, Ichikawa Y, Bouvet M, Endo I, Zhao M, Hoffman RM. Efficacy of tumor-targeting Salmonella typhimurium A1-R in combination with anti-angiogenesis therapy on a pancreatic cancer patient-derived orthotopic xenograph (PDOX) and cell line mouse models. Oncotarget. 2014;5:12346–57. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.2641. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Matsumoto Y, Miwa S, Zhang Y, Hiroshima Y, Yano S, Uehara F, Yamamoto M, Toneri M, Bouvet M, Matsubara H, Hoffman RM, Zhao M. Efficacy of tumor-targeting Salmonella typhimurium A1-R on nude mouse models of metastatic and disseminated human ovarian cancer. J Cell Biochem. 2014;115:1996–2003. doi: 10.1002/jcb.24871. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Matsumoto Y, Miwa S, Zhang Y, Zhao M, Yano S, Uehara F, Yamamoto M, Hiroshima Y, Toneri M, Bouvet M, Matsubara H, Tsuchiya H, Hoffman RM. Intraperitoneal administration of tumor-targeting Salmonella typhimurium A1-R inhibits disseminated human ovarian cancer and extends survival in nude mice. Oncotarget. 2015;6:11369–77. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.3607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Yano S, Zhang Y, Zhao M, Hiroshima Y, Miwa S, Uehara F, Kishimoto H, Tazawa H, Bouvet M, Fujiwara T, Hoffman RM. Tumor-targeting Salmonella typhimurium A1-R decoys quiescent cancer cells to cycle as visualized by FUCCI imaging and become sensitive to chemotherapy. Cell Cycle. 2014;13:3958–63. doi: 10.4161/15384101.2014.964115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Hiroshima Y, Zhang Y, Zhao M, Zhang N, Murakami T, Maawy A, Mii S, Uehara F, Yamamoto M, Miwa S, Yano S, Momiyama M, Mori R, Matsuyama R, Chishima T, Tanaka K, Ichikawa Y, Bouvet M, Endo I, Hoffman RM. Tumor-targeting Salmonella typhimurium A1-R in combination with Trastuzumab eradicates HER-2-positive cervical cancer cells in patient-derived mouse models. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0120358. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0120358. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Hayashi K, Zhao M, Yamauchi K, Yamamoto N, Tsuchiya H, Tomita K, Hoffman RM. Cancer metastasis directly eradicated by targeted therapy with a modified Salmonella typhimurium. J Cell Biochem. 2009;106:992–8. doi: 10.1002/jcb.22078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Hayashi K, Zhao M, Yamauchi K, Yamamoto N, Tsuchiya H, Tomita K, Kishimoto H, Bouvet M, Hoffman RM. Systemic targeting of primary bone tumor and lung metastasis of high-grade osteosarcoma in nude mice with a tumor-selective strain of Salmonella typhimurium. Cell Cycle. 2009;8:870–5. doi: 10.4161/cc.8.6.7891. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Tome Y, Zhang Y, Momiyama M, Maehara H, Kanaya F, Tomita K, Tsuchiya H, Bouvet M, Hoffman RM, Zhao M. Primer dosing of S. typhimurium A1-R potentiates tumor-targeting and efficacy in immunocompetent mice. Anticancer Res. 2013;33:97–102. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Miwa S, Zhang Y, Baek K-E, Uehara F, Yano S, Yamamoto M, Hiroshima Y, Matsumoto Y, Kimura H, Hayashi K, Yamamoto N, Tsuchiya H, Hoffman RM, Zhao M. Inhibition of spontaneous and experimental lung metastasis of soft-tissue sarcoma by tumor-targeting Salmonella typhimurium A1-R. Oncotarget. 2014;5:12849–61. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.2561. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Kimura H, Zhang L, Zhao M, Hayashi K, Tsuchiya H, Tomita K, Bouvet M, Wessels J, Hoffman RM. Targeted therapy of spinal cord glioma with a genetically-modified Salmonella typhimurium. Cell Proliferation. 2010;43:41–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2184.2009.00652.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Momiyama M, Zhao M, Kimura H, Tran B, Chishima T, Bouvet M, Endo I, Hoffman RM. Inhibition and eradication of human glioma with tumor-targeting Salmonella typhimurium in an orthotopic nude-mouse model. Cell Cycle. 2012;11:628–32. doi: 10.4161/cc.11.3.19116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Kishimoto H, Aki R, Urata Y, Bouvet M, Momiyama M, Tanaka N, Fujiwara T, Hoffman RM. Tumor-selective adenoviral-mediated GFP genetic labeling of human cancer in the live mouse reports future recurrence after resection. Cell Cycle. 2011;10:2737–2741. doi: 10.4161/cc.10.16.16756. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Blagosklonny MV. Matching targets for selective cancer therapy. Drug Discov Today. 2003;8:1104–7. doi: 10.1016/s1359-6446(03)02806-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Blagosklonny MV. Teratogens as anti-cancer drugs. Cell Cycle. 2005;4:1518–21. doi: 10.4161/cc.4.11.2208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Blagosklonny MV. Treatment with inhibitors of caspases, that are substrates of drug transporters, selectively permits chemotherapy-induced apoptosis in multidrug-resistant cells but protects normal cells. Leukemia. 2001;15:936–41. doi: 10.1038/sj.leu.2402127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Blagosklonny MV. Target for cancer therapy: proliferating cells or stem cells. Leukemia. 2006;20:385–91. doi: 10.1038/sj.leu.2404075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Apontes P, Leontieva OV, Demidenko ZN, Li F, Blagosklonny MV. Exploring long-term protection of normal human fibroblasts and epithelial cells from chemotherapy in cell culture. Oncotarget. 2011;2:222–33. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Blagosklonny MV. Tissue-selective therapy of cancer. Br J Cancer. 2003;89:1147–51. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Maawy AA, Hiroshima Y, Zhang Y, Luiken GA, Hoffman RM, Bouvet M. Polyethylene glycol (PEG) linked to near infrared (NIR) dyes conjugated to chimeric anti-carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) antibody enhances imaging of liver metastases in a nude-mouse model of human colon cancer. PLoS One. 2014;9:e97965. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0097965. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Ma H, Li X, Yang Z, Okuno S, Kawaguchi T, Yagi S, Bouvet M, Hoffman RM. High antimetastatic efficacy of MEN4901/T-0128, a novel camptothecin carboxymethyldextran conjugate. J Surg Res. 2011;171:684–90. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2010.05.066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Katz MH, Takimoto S, Spivack D, Moossa AR, Hoffman RM, Bouvet M. A novel red fluorescent protein orthotopic pancreatic cancer model for the preclinical evaluation of chemotherapeutics. J Surg Res. 2003;113:151–60. doi: 10.1016/s0022-4804(03)00234-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Metildi CA, Kaushal S, Snyder CS, Hoffman RM, Bouvet M. Fluorescence-guided surgery of human colon cancer increases complete resection resulting in cures in an orthotopic nude mouse model. J Surg Res. 2013;179:87–93. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2012.08.052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Uchugonova A, Zhao M, Weinigel M, Zhang Y, Bouvet M, Hoffman RM, Koenig K. Multiphoton tomography visualizes collagen fibers in the tumor microenvironment that maintain cancer-cell anchorage and shape. J Cell Biochem. 2013;114:99–102. doi: 10.1002/jcb.24305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Yamauchi K, Yang M, Jiang P, Xu M, Yamamoto N, Tsuchiya H, Tomita K, Moossa AR, Bouvet M, Hoffman RM. Development of real-time subcellular dynamic multicolor imaging of cancer-cell trafficking in live mice with a variable-magnification whole-mouse imaging system. Cancer Res. 2006;66:4208–14. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-3927. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Oncotarget are provided here courtesy of Impact Journals, LLC

RESOURCES