Table 3. Differences in Stage Distribution of Expression-Stratified Populations.

#	Direction with survival	Gene name	Lower expression		Higher expression		p-value for differences between Stages 1 + 2 vs. 3 + 4 (χ2)
			Stages 1 + 2	Stages 3 + 4	Stages 1 + 2	Stages 3 + 4
1	+	HLA-DRA	85	87	115	57	0.066
2	−	GPR84	129	43	78	94	p < 0.0001
3	−	FCGR1B	130	42	72	100	p < 0.0001
4	−	FCGR1C	128	44	69	103	p < 0.0001
5	−	AIF1	119	53	88	84	0.044
6	−	IL10RA	113	59	87	85	0.2772
7	−	SP140	118	54	75	97	p < 0.0001
8	−	LAIR1	122	50	81	91	p < 0.0001
9	−	FCGR1A	132	40	72	100	p < 0.0001
10	−	SLAMF8	122	50	88	84	0.0132
11	−	BATF	126	46	69	103	p < 0.0001
12	−	HAMP	133	39	77	95	p < 0.0001
13	−	CD72	124	48	75	97	p < 0.0001
14	−	PARVG	113	59	82	90	0.0484
15	−	TRPM2	114	58	91	81	0.6864
16	−	HCST	124	48	81	91	p < 0.0001
17	+	XCR1	86	86	116	56	0.066
18	−	FCGR3A	116	56	93	79	0.6644
19	−	LILRB1	121	51	86	86	0.0088
20	−	ZNF80	111	61	80	92	0.0484
21	−	RAC2	113	59	74	98	p < 0.0001
22	−	WAS	117	55	77	95	p < 0.0001
23	−	CYTH4	114	58	84	88	0.0704
24	−	SPI1	120	52	83	89	0.0044
25	−	TNFSF13B	126	46	72	100	p < 0.0001
26	−	MYO1F	115	57	88	84	0.1936
27	−	GNA15	109	63	89	83	1
28	+	LILRA4	92	80	115	57	0.6776
29	−	CTLA4	115	57	81	91	0.0132
30	−	CCL5	122	50	76	96	p < 0.0001
31	−	IFNG	121	51	76	96	p < 0.0001
32	−	CXCL13	128	44	72	100	p < 0.0001
33	−	FERMT3	112	60	86	86	0.2816
34	−	C1QA	114	58	84	88	0.0704
35	−	IL2RG	125	47	77	95	p < 0.0001
36	−	CD80	108	64	89	83	1
37	−	C1QB	116	56	87	85	0.0924
38	−	PTPN7	125	47	73	99	p < 0.0001
39	−	FCER1G	126	46	80	92	p < 0.0001
40	−	ARHGAP9	120	52	85	87	0.0088
41	−	LILRB2	106	66	89	83	1
42	−	DERL3	119	53	79	93	p < 0.0001
43	−	LILRB3	117	55	80	92	0.0044
44	−	JSRP1	122	50	78	94	p < 0.0001

The counts represent the distribution of patients who were diagnosed with the mentioned pathological stages. Values in the column “direction with survival”: “−” = more survivors in the low-expression third. “+” = more survivors in the higher-expression third. Significance values in the right column are shown after multiple testing correction and the p-values in bold were significant after correction.