Skip to main content
PMC home page
Oncotarget logoLink to Oncotarget
. 2015 Sep 16;6(32):33733–33742. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.5254

Imaging of carbonic anhydrase IX with an 111In-labeled dual-motif inhibitor

Xing Yang 1,#, Il Minn 1,#, Steven P Rowe 1, Sangeeta Ray Banerjee 1, Michael A Gorin 2, Mary Brummet 1, Hye Soo Lee 1, Soo Min Koo 1, Polina Sysa-Shah 1, Ronnie C Mease 1, Sridhar Nimmagadda 1, Mohamad E Allaf 2, Martin G Pomper 1
PMCID: PMC4741798  PMID: 26418876

Abstract

We developed a new scaffold for radionuclide-based imaging and therapy of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) targeting carbonic anhydrase IX (CAIX). Compound XYIMSR-01, a DOTA-conjugated, bivalent, low-molecular-weight ligand, has two moieties that target two separate sites on CAIX, imparting high affinity. We synthesized [111In]XYIMSR-01 in 73.8–75.8% (n = 3) yield with specific radioactivities ranging from 118 – 1,021 GBq/μmol (3,200–27,600 Ci/mmol). Single photon emission computed tomography of [111In]XYIMSR-01 in immunocompromised mice bearing CAIX-expressing SK-RC-52 tumors revealed radiotracer uptake in tumor as early as 1 h post-injection. Biodistribution studies demonstrated 26% injected dose per gram of radioactivity within tumor at 1 h. Tumor-to-blood, muscle and kidney ratios were 178.1 ± 145.4, 68.4 ± 29.0 and 1.7 ± 1.2, respectively, at 24 h post-injection. Retention of radioactivity was exclusively observed in tumors by 48 h, the latest time point evaluated. The dual targeting strategy to engage CAIX enabled specific detection of ccRCC in this xenograft model, with pharmacokinetics surpassing those of previously described radionuclide-based probes against CAIX.

Keywords: CAIX, single photon emission computed tomography, molecular imaging, renal cell carcinoma, indium-111

INTRODUCTION

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the most common neoplasm of the kidney [1], with an estimated 60,000 patients diagnosed annually in the United States [2]. Among cases of RCC, the clear cell subtype (ccRCC) is the most prevalent, accounting for up to 70% of RCCs [3–5]. Common to ccRCC is loss of the Von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) tumor suppressor gene [6]. Loss of VHL in turn leads to over-expression of carbonic anhydrase IX (CAIX) [7], a membrane-associated enzyme responsible for catalyzing the reversible hydration of carbon dioxide to a bicarbonate anion and a proton [8, 9]. Over-expression of CAIX has been demonstrated in approximately 95% of ccRCC tumor specimens [10–12], making it a useful biomarker for this disease.

CAIX has limited expression in normal tissues and organs with the exception of the gastrointestinal tract, gallbladder and pancreatic ducts [8, 9, 13–15]. No report has demonstrated CAIX expression in normal renal parenchyma or benign renal masses [8, 9, 13–15]. Feasibility for the non-invasive detection of ccRCC based on CAIX expression has been proved with the radiolabeled antibody G250 [16] and its clinical potential has been reviewed [17]. However, antibodies as molecular imaging agents suffer from pharmacokinetic limitations, including slow blood and non-target tissue clearance (normally 2–5 days or longer) and non-specific organ uptake. Low-molecular-weight (LMW) agents demonstrate faster pharmacokinetics and higher specific signal within clinically convenient times after administration. They can also be synthesized in radiolabeled form more easily, and may offer a shorter path to regulatory approval [18–20].

Targeting CAIX with LMW inhibitors has proved challenging in part because fifteen human isoforms of carbonic anhydrase, with high sequence homology, have been identified. Those isoforms share common structural features, including a zinc-containing catalytic site, a central twisted β-sheet surrounded by helical connections, and additional β-strands. The isoforms, however, do vary widely in terms of intracellular location, expression levels, and tissue and organ distribution [8, 9]. Significant effort has been expended on development of sulfonamides and other LMW CAIX ligands for nuclear imaging of CAIX, but most reported agents have been fraught with low tumor uptake and significant off-target accumulation [21–26].

A new LMW CAIX targeting agent has recently been reported that is composed of two binding motifs, one accessing the CAIX active site and the other binding to an as yet unidentified site [27]. Conjugated with the infrared dye IRDye®750, the dual-motif inhibitor showed 10% ID/g tumor uptake. In comparison, agents targeting only the active site show 2% ID/g [27]. However, that optical agent also demonstrated high kidney as well as other non-specific organ uptake at 24 h post-administration. Additionally, utility of that agent for in vivo studies is somewhat limited due to the substantial attenuation of light emission through tissue inherent to optical agents. Such limitations call for an agent that retains affinity for CAIX, but clears rapidly from non-target tissues and can be detected with existing clinical instrumentation.

Here we report the synthesis and in vivo performance of [111In]XYIMSR-01, a modified dual-motif CAIX inhibitor with improved tumor uptake and pharmacokinetics for nuclear imaging of ccRCC. This reagent may enable imaging not only of metastatic ccRCC but also localized disease within the kidney due to relatively rapid clearance from normal renal tissue.

RESULTS

Recently Wichert and co-workers [27] identified 4,4-bis(4-hydroxyphenyl)valeric acid/acetazolamide as a dual-motif CAIX inhibitor from a DNA-encoded chemical library [28–31]. The addition of a second binding motif significantly improved the potency of sulfonamide inhibitors (up to 40 times) [27], while also suggesting a solution to the problem of generating an isoform-selective CAIX inhibitor caused by conserved structures at the active site. We hypothesized that the slow renal clearance and high liver uptake of the reported optical agent might derive from the hydrophobicity of the molecule. To improve the pharmacokinetics, we replaced the IRDye®750 portion of the molecule with 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetraacetic acid (DOTA), a more hydrophilic species that also enables convenient radiolabeling with metal isotopes for positron emission tomography (PET), single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), and radiopharmaceutical therapy [32, 33]. We chose indium-111 as our initial radionuclide for its relatively long half-life (2.8 day) to enable extended monitoring of pharmacokinetics.

Chemical synthesis of XYIMSR-01 was achieved as in Scheme 1. Following a reported procedure, key intermediate 1 was obtained via solid support synthetic methods [27]. We generated XYIMSR-01 by conjugating the commercially available DOTA-NHS ester 7 with 1 in 82% yield. In(III) was incorporated into DOTA in nearly quantitative yield in 0.2 M NaOAc buffer at 60°C, providing the non-radiolabeled standard, [113/115In]XYIMSR-01. After optimization, baseline separation between XYIMSR-01 and [113/115In]XYIMSR-01 could be achieved by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC).

graphic file with name oncotarget-06-33733-g001.jpg

Open in a new tab

We synthesized fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-labeled 8 as a standard to measure CAIX binding affinities of the corresponding radiotracers. Compound 8 bound specifically to CAIX-expressing SK-RC-52 cells, but not to CAIX-negative BxPC3 cells measured by fluorescence activated cell sorting (Fig. 1A, B) [27]. CAIX-selective binding was confirmed by fluorescence microscopic analyses of SK-RC-53 and BxPC3 cells labeled with 8 (Fig. 2). Only SK-RC-52 cells were stained with 8 on the surface of the cells, where CAIX resides (Fig. 2D). In order to test the relative binding of XYIMSR-01 and [113/115In]XYIMSR-01 to CAIX we modified a competitive fluorescence polarization assay [34] for use with 8. For the competitive binding assay, after optimization for background fluorescence, we chose concentrations of 80 nM and 100 nM for 8 and CAIX, respectively. As a positive control, we employed non-fluorescent 1, which has a reported Kd value of 2.6 nM [27]. Increasing concentrations of 1, XYIMSR-01 and [113/115In]XYIMSR-01 were incubated with CAIX for 30 min at room temperature. After 8 was added, fluorescence polarization signal was recorded. The IC50 values determined for 1, XYIMSR-01 and [113/115In]XYIMSR-01 were 75.9, 67.0, and 108.2 nM, respectively (Fig. 3). These findings suggest that the DOTA-modified adducts were capable of binding CAIX with high affinity, on the order of positive control 1. We took advantage of fluorescence polarization using 8 to measure relative binding affinities for other isoforms of the carbonic anhydrases. We chose to test one cytosolic (CAII) and an additional membrane-localized isoform (CAXII). Compound 8 exhibited poor binding affinity to cytosolic CAII (Fig. 4A) and about three-fold lower affinity to CAXII (Fig. 4C), indicating selectivity to CAIX.

Figure 1. Dual-motif CAIX-targeting small molecule labeled with FITC 8 binds to CAIX-expressing SK-RC-52 cells.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

A. Structure of 8. B. FACS analysis of 8 for binding to CAIX-negative BxPC3 cells (left) and CAIX-expressing SK-RC-52 cells (right). Compound 8 showed significant binding to CAIX-expressing SK-RC-52 cells at concentrations as low as 10 nM.

Figure 2. FITC-labeled 8 binds to the surface of CAIX-expressing SK-RC-52 cells.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Fluorescence microscopic analyses of BxPC3 A and B, and SK-RC-52 C and D. Cells are non-labeled (A and C) and labeled with 8 (B and D). Compound 8 bound to the cell surface of SK-RC-52. Scale bar = 50 μm.

Figure 3. Compounds 1, XYIMSR-01 and [113/115In]XYIMSR-01 demonstrate high binding affinity to CAIX.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

IC50 values of positive control CAIX targeting agent 1 A. XYIMSR-01 B. and [113/115In]XYIMSR-01 C. were determined relative to the inhibition of fluorescence polarization of FITC labeled 8 with a known Kd of 0.2 nM for CAIX [27].

Figure 4. Compound 8 had higher binding affinity to CAIX compared to CAII and CAXII.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Saturation binding curves for CAII, CAIX, and CAXII were generated. 5 nM of compound 8 was titrated by increasing concentrations of CAII, CAIX, and CAXII and the resultant fluorescence polarization (mP) was measured, with EC50 values calculated.

We next investigated the capacity for [111In]XYIMSR-01 to detect CAIX-expressing tumors in vivo using SPECT. The synthesis and purification of [111In]XYIMSR-01 were achieved within 1.5 h in yields of 73.8–75.8% (n = 3) and with specific radioactivities of 118.4 – 1,021.2 GBq/μM (3,200 -27,600 Ci/mmol). [111In]XYIMSR-01 was administered intravenously to two mice with SK-RC-52 flank tumors, followed by SPECT/CT. As shown in Fig. 5 and Supplementary Fig. 1, radiotracer uptake was observed within the tumors at 1 h post-injection. By 24 h post-injection, nearly all of the radioactivity in the kidneys and other organs had been eliminated, with tumor still retaining significant amounts of radiotracer. Image contrast improved even further by 48 h post-injection.

Figure 5. [111In]XYIMSR-01 enabled specific imaging of CAIX-expressing SK-RC-52 tumors.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

SPECT/CT imaging of two mice harboring CAIX-expressing SKRC-52 tumors within the lower left flank. Images were obtained at 1, 4, 8, 24 and 48 h after injection of 14.8 MBq (400 μCi) of [111In]XYIMSR-01 via the tail vein. Arrows indicate tumors.

Biodistribution confirmed tumor-selective uptake and retention of [111In]XYIMSR-01 observed in the imaging studies (Table 1 and Supplementary Table 1). At 1 h post-injection, 26.0% ID/g of radiotracer uptake was observed within the tumor. Tumor/blood and tumor/muscle ratios were 19.7 and 12.7, respectively. Major non-specific organ uptake was observed in kidney, lung, stomach, small intestine and liver (Table 1). Biodistribution studies conducted at later time points showed that radiotracer continued to clear from those organs while being retained within tumor. Considerable but lower affinity of [111In]XYIMSR-01 to CAXII compared to CAIX (Fig. 4.) may explain the initial renal uptake of [111In]XYIMSR-01 but more rapid early clearance from kidney than from tumor, since CAXII is abundant in kidney [35]. At 24 h post-injection, tumor/blood and tumor/muscle ratios reached 178 and 68, respectively. Importantly, tumor/kidney ratio reached 1.7, suggesting that it might be possible to detect local ccRCC in the kidney at 24 h. The enhanced hydrophilicity of [111In]XYIMSR-01, relative to the reported optical analog [27], may have contributed to the low liver uptake. The tumor/liver ratio for [111In]XYIMSR-01 and the optical agent were 8.5 and 4.0 at 24 h, respectively [27]. All other organs showed tumor/organ ratios close to or higher than 10, indicating that suitable image contrast could be expected from these imaging agents. Biodistribution of [111In]XYIMSR-01 simultaneously injected with non-radioactive competitor 1 showed competitive inhibition of uptake within tumors down to 1% ID/g at 24 h and 48 h post-injection, indicating CAIX-mediated binding (Table 1). The fast normal tissue clearance and the long-lasting tumor retention may enable applications to radiopharmaceutical therapy with appropriately selected therapeutic radiometals.

Table 1. Biodistribution of [111In]XYIMSR-01 at 1 h, 4 h, 8 h, 24 h and 48 h post-injection.

Organs 1 h 4 h 8 h 24 h 24 h + Block 48 h 48 h + Block
Blood 1.34 ± 0.17 0.65 ± 0.06 0.48 ± 0.02 0.15 ± 0.02 0.03 ± 0.00 0.06 ± 0.02 0.03 ± 0.00
Heart 5.98 ± 0.53 2.91 ± 0.45 2.61 ± 0.35 1.16 ± 0.20 0.04 ± 0.01 0.84 ± 0.16 0.04 ± 0.01
Lung 45.85 ± 19.89 17.85 ± 3.55 17.39 ± 8.99 11.01 ± 3.71 0.12 ± 0.02 9.22 ± 1.25 0.09 ± 0.02
Pancreas 3.81 ± 0.72 1.54 ± 0.40 1.61 ± 0.28 0.69 ± 0.18 0.03 ± 0.00 0.59 ± 0.18 0.03 ± 0.01
Spleen 0.52 ± 0.04 0.51 ± 0.08 0.64 ± 0.07 0.69 ± 0.39 0.08 ± 0.01 0.67 ± 0.13 0.11 ± 0.03
Fat 1.03 ± 0.24 0.42 ± 0.22 0.45 ± 0.08 0.28 ± 0.19 0.02 ± 0.01 0.25 ± 0.08 0.03 ± 0.01
Brain 1.23 ± 1.10 0.45 ± 0.06 0.59 ± 0.09 0.71 ± 0.85 0.03 ± 0.00 0.41 ± 0.05 0.03 ± 0.01
Muscle (mm) 2.34 ± 2.19 1.01 ± 0.28 1.09 ± 0.15 0.35 ± 0.12 0.02 ± 0.00 0.39 ± 0.28 0.02 ± 0.00
Sm. intestine 9.37 ± 1.26 4.27 ± 0.69 4.31 ± 0.67 2.11 ± 0.33 0.08 ± 0.01 1.22 ± 0.44 0.08 ± 0.02
Liver 8.36 ± 0.73 4.00 ± 0.58 3.65 ± 0.65 3.02 ± 3.46 0.10 ± 0.02 1.65 ± 0.26 0.13 ± 0.04
Stomach 16.71 ± 2.46 7.91 ± 1.28 8.74 ± 1.26 3.31 ± 1.25 0.14 ± 0.02 1.82 ± 0.43 0.14 ± 0.03
Kidney (kid) 71.26 ± 8.74 41.52 ± 6.07 28.79 ± 21.35 15.29 ± 1.69 0.68 ± 0.14 8.78 ± 1.89 0.45 ± 0.09
Bladder 4.90 ± 4.96 2.68 ± 1.89 2.28 ± 0.51 0.74 ± 0.17 0.20 ± 0.07 0.38 ± 0.18 0.14 ± 0.03
Tumor 26.01 ± 5.74 20.83 ± 6.25 34.00 ± 15.16 25.62 ± 17.67 1.41 ± 0.20 13.92 ± 6.67 1.22 ± 0.54
Tumor/blood 19.7 ± 4.8 31.9 ± 9.4 77.0 ± 32.5 178.1 ± 145.4 45.2 ± 9.7 212.0 ± 41.4 45.4 ± 13.8
Tumor/mm 12.7 ± 5.8 21.4 ± 7.2 34.2 ± 16.0 68.4 ± 29.0 91.4 ± 11.1 52.0 ± 21.0 75.1 ± 17.7
Tumor/kid 0.36 ± 0.06 0.50 ± 0.15 3.1 ± 3.1 1.7 ± 1.2 2.1 ± 0.3 1.5 ± 0.5 2.7 ± 0.8
Open in a new tab

Results are expressed as the percentage injected dose per gram (%ID/g) of tissue, n = 5.

Despite intensive effort expended in the development of CAIX inhibitors designed to engage only the active site, nuclear imaging analogs have continued to demonstrate limited success, showing < 2% ID/g within tumor and high radiotracer uptake within kidney and liver [21–26]. Peptides that bind to the surface of CAIX may provide an alternative solution to selective targeting, but they are limited by low potency and in vivo stability [27]. Dual-motif ligands that may concurrently engage the CAIX active site and surface binding demonstrated high potency and tumor uptake for [111In]XYIMSR-01 and for the previously reported optical agent [27]. The hydrophilicity of [111In]XYIMSR-01, with multiple carboxylates and heteroatoms, improved non-target organ clearance, including that from kidney and liver. Further detailed studies on the selectivity of [111In]XYIMSR-01 for CAIX and its stability in vivo are under way.

METERIALS AND METHODS

Chemistry

Solvents and chemicals obtained from commercial sources were of analytical grade or better and used without further purification. Fmoc-protected azidolysine, HBTU, and N-α-fmoc-L-aspartic acid α-tert-butyl ester were purchased from Chem Impex International, Inc. (Wooddale, IL). Carrier-free [111In]InCl3 was purchased from MDS Nordion (Ottawa, ON, Canada). DOTA-NHS-ester (1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetraacetic acid mono N-hydroxysuccinimide ester) was purchased from Macrocyclics, Inc. (Dallas, TX). Indium (III) nitrate, triethylsilane (Et3SiH), N,N-diisopropylethylamine (DIEA), triethylamine (TEA), piperidine, 4,4-bis(4-hydroxyphenyl)valeric acid, copper iodide (CuI), and tris[(1-benzyl-1H-1,2,3-triazol-4-yl) methyl] amine (TBTA) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Saint Louis, MO). Pre-loaded O-bis-(aminoethyl)ethylene glycol on trityl resin was purchased from EMD Millipore (Billerica, MA). Flash chromatography was performed using MP SiliTech 32–63 D 60Å silica gel purchased from Bodman (Aston, PA). Recombinant human CAIX was purchased from R&D Systems (Minnepolis, MN). 1H NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker Ultrashield 500 MHz spectrometer. Chemical shifts (δ) were reported in ppm downfield by reference to proton resonances resulting from incomplete deuteration of the NMR solvent. ESI mass spectra were obtained on a Bruker Daltonics Esquire 3000 Plus spectrometer (Billerica, MA).

HPLC purification of non-labeled compounds was performed using a Phenomenex C18 Luna 10 × 250 mm2 column on an Agilent 1260 infinity LC system (Santa Clara, CA). HPLC purification of radiolabeled (111In) ligand was performed on another Phenomenex C18 Luna 10 × 250 mm2 and a Varian Prostar System (Palo Alto, CA), equipped with a Varian ProStar 325 UV-Vis variable wavelength detector and a Bioscan (Poway, CA) Flow-count in-line radioactivity detector, all controlled by Galaxie software. The specific radioactivity was calculated as the ratio of the radioactivity eluting at the retention time of product during the preparative HPLC purification to the mass corresponding to the area under the curve of the UV absorption. The purity of tested compounds as determined by analytical HPLC with absorbance at 254 nm was > 95%.

2,2′,2′'-(10-((14S,18S,22S)-18,22-dicarboxy-27,27-bis(4-hydroxyphenyl)-2,13,16,20,24-pentaoxo-14-(4-(4-(4-oxo-4-((5-sulfamoyl-1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-yl)amino)butyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)butyl)-6,9-dioxa-3,12,15,19,23-pentaazaoctacosyl)-1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7-triyl)triacetic acid (XYIMSR-01)

N4-((S)-1-((2-(2-(2-aminoethoxy)ethoxy)ethyl)amino)-1-oxo-6-(4-(4-oxo-4-((5-sulfamoyl-1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-yl)amino)butyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)hexan-2-yl)-N2-((S)-3-(4,4-bis(4-hydroxyphenyl)pentanamido)-3-carboxypropanoyl)-L-asparagine (1) 19 mg (0.017 mmol), DOTA-NHS 7 16 mg (0.021 mmol) and N,N-diisopropylethylamine 150 μL were mixed in 2 mL DMSO. The reaction was stirred at room temperature for 2 h. Solvent was removed under vacuum. 21 mg (0.014 mmol) of product XYIMSR-01 was obtained as a white powder after purification by HPLC in 82% yield. HPLC conditions: Phenomenex, Luna 10 × 250 mm, 10 μ. Gradient 10/90/0.1 to 50/50/0.1 MeCN/H2O/TFA, 0–10 min, flow 10 mL/min. Product eluted at 6.3 min.

1H-NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 13.01 (s, 1H), 12.77 (br. 2H), 9.17 (br. s, 2H), 8.53 (br, 1H), 8.33 (s, 2H), 8.19 (d, J = 8.0, 1H), 8.09 (d, J =7.9, 1H), 7.91 (d, J = 8.1, 1H), 7.88 (t, J = 6.0, 1H), 7.84 (s, 1H), 7.45 (br. 2H), 6.92 (d, J = 8.4, 4H), 6.64 (d, J =8.4, 4H), 4.54 – 4.44 (m, 2H), 4.24 (t, J = 7.2, 2H), 4.17 (td, J = 8.3, 5.5, 1H), 4.0–3.0 (36H, overlap with water signal), 2.65 (t, J = 7.5, 2H), 2.64 – 2.55 (m, 4H), 2.51 – 2.41 (m, 2H), 2.17 (t, J = 8.2, 2H) 1.94 (m, J = 7.5, 2H), 1.88 – 1.82 (m, 2H), 1.75 (m, J = 7.5, 2H), 1.66 – 1.60 (m, 1H), 1.53 – 1.46 (m, 1H), 1.45 (s, 3H), 1.28 – 1.17 (m, 2H). MS, calcd. for C61H88N16NaO22S2+ [M+Na]+: 1483.6; Found: 1483.4.

113/115Indium(III) 2,2′,2′'-(10-((14S,18S,22S)-18,22-dicarboxy-27,27-bis(4-hydroxyphenyl)-2,13,16,20,24-pentaoxo-14-(4-(4-(4-oxo-4-((5-sulfamoyl-1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-yl)amino)butyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)butyl)-6,9-dioxa-3,12,15,19,23-pentaazaoctacosyl)-1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7-triyl)triacetate ( [113/115In] XYIMSR-01)

2 mg (0.0013 mmol) XYIMSR-01 was dissolved in 1 mL of 0.2 M NaOAc water solution. Then, 20 μL of a solution of In(NO3)3 containing 0.6 mg of In(NO3)3 was added. The solution was kept at 60°C for 30 min. 2.0 mg [113/115In]XYIMSR-01 was obtained as white crystals after purification by HPLC in 98% yield. HPLC conditions: Phenomenex, Luna 10 × 250 mm, 10 μ. 20/80/TFA MeCN/H2O /TFA, flow 10 mL/min. Product eluted at 10.6 min.

MS, calcd. for C61H85InN16NaO22S2+ [M+Na]+: 1595.4; Found: 1595.3.

Radiosynthesis of [111In]XYIMSR-01

20 μg XYIMSR-01 was dissolved in10 μL of 0.2M NaOAc followed by addition of 3.3 mCi of 111InCl3 solution to provide a final pH = 5.5–6. The mixture was heated in a water bath at 65°C for 30 min. Radiolabeling was monitored by HPLC. At completion, the reaction mixture was diluted with 1 mL of water then loaded onto a preparative HPLC column for purification. Retention times for the radiolabeled compound, [111In]XYIMSR-01,and starting material, XYIMSR-01,were optimized to the point of baseline separation, with [111In]XYIMSR-01 eluting first. 2.5 mCi of [111In]XYIMSR-01 was obtained at a radiochemical yield of 75.8% in specific radioactivites of 118.4 GBq/μmol (3,200 Ci/mmol). The identity of the radiolabeled product was confirmed by co-injection with [113/115In]XYIMSR-01 and co-elution on HPLC with the same condition. Another two syntheses were performed under similar conditions. The average yield was 74% (n = 3). The specific activities ranged from 118 to 1021.2 GBq/μmol (3,200 to 27,600 Ci/mmol). For preparative runs, the HPLC solvent was removed under vacuum. [111In]XYIMSR-01 was formulated in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) for the imaging study. HPLC conditions: Phenomenex, Luna 10 × 250 mm, 10μ. 19/81/0.1 MeCN/H2O/TFA, flow 4 mL/min. Product eluted at 28.3 min, while starting material eluted at 30.2 min.

Cell lines and mouse models

Animal experiments were performed in accordance with protocols approved by the Johns Hopkins Animal Care and Use Committee (ACUC). Six-week-old female NOD/SCID mice were purchased from the Animal Resource Core of the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center of Johns Hopkins and were subcutaneously injected in the lower left flank with 1 × 106 SK-RC-52 cells in RPMI 1640 GlutaMAX™ media (Life Technologies, Frederick, MD) supplemented with 1% fetal bovine serum (FBS). Mice were monitored for tumor size and used for SPECT/CT imaging when the size of the tumor reached 100 mm3.

FACS analysis

CAIX-positive SK-RC-52 and CAIX-negative BxPC3 cells were maintained in RPMI 1640 media supplemented with 10% FBS and 1 × penicillin-streptomycin in a 37°C humidified incubator. Cells were detached from the flask with trypsin and reconstituted in RPMI 1640 media supplemented with 1% FBS at a density of 1 × 106 cells per mL. FITC-labeled 8 was added to the cells at the indicated concentration and incubated at room temperature for 30 min. Cells were washed twice with the same media for staining and analyzed using the FACSCalibur (BD Bioscience, San Jose, CA) instrument.

Microscopic analyses

CAIX-positive SK-RC-52 and CAIX-negative BxPC3 cells were seeded on to 8-well chamber glass slides (Lab-Tek®IICC2™, Nunc, Rochester NY) and incubated in RPMI 1640 media supplemented with 10% FBS and 1 × penicillin-streptomycin in a 37°C humidified incubator for 48 h. Cells were stained with 100 nM of FITC-labeled 8 for 1 h in the same growth media followed by washing twice with the same media. Cells were fixed with 10% formaldehyde (Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO) and washed three times with PBS. Cells were treated with 20 nM DAPI (4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole) in PBS. The chambers were removed and the Vectashield mounting solution (Vector Laboratories, Inc., Burlingame, CA) was added to the sample. Fluorescence microscopic images were taken using the Nikon Eclipse 80i epifluorescence microscope (Nikon Instruments Inc., Melville, NY) and the images were processed by the Element software (Nikon Instruments Inc.).

Competitive fluorescence polarization assay [34]

Fluorescence polarization (FP) experiments were performed in 21 μL of the assay buffer (12.5 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 75 mM NaCl) in black flat bottom 384-well microplates (Corning, Inc., New York, NY). The FP reaction employed 100 nM of purified CAIX (R&D systems, Minneapolis, MN) and 80 nM FITC-labeled 8 [27] within the assay buffer. The FP values were measured as mP units using the Victor3 multi-label plate reader equipped with excitation (485 nm) and emission (535 nm) filters (Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA). 100 nM CAIX was incubated with serially diluted (from 1 μM to 61 fM) concentrations of the three targeting molecules, 1, XYIMSR-01, and [113/115In]XYIMSR-01 for 30 min at room temperature in 384-well plates. 80 nM 8 was added to each well and the reaction was incubated for 30 min at room temperature followed by FP measurement. Experiments were carried out in triplicate and the concentration resulting in 50% response (IC50) was calculated in GraphPad Prism 5 (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA) using the sigmoidal dose-response regression function.

Fluorescence polarization for affinity comparison

Human recombinant CAII, CAIX, and CAXII were purchased from R&D systems (Minneapolis, MN). 5 nM of FITC-labeled 8 were mixed with serially diluted (from 1 μM to 19 fM) isoforms of the carbonic anhydrases in PBS within 384 well Small Volume™ LoBase Microplates (Greiner Bio-One, Frickenhausen Germany). The mixtures were incubated at room temperature for 1 h. Fluorescence polarization was measured using a Safire2™ plate reader (Tecan, Morrisville, NC), with 475 nm excitation and 530 nm emission wavelengths.

Imaging

Mice harboring subcutaneous SK-RC-52 tumors with the lower left flank were injected with 14.8 MBq (400 μCi) of [111In]XYIMSR-01 in 250 μL of PBS (pH = 7.0) intravenously (tail vein). Anesthesia was then induced with 3% isofluorane and maintained at 2% isoflurane. Physiologic temperature was maintained with an external light source while the mouse was on the gantry. Imaging employed a CT-equipped Gamma Medica-Ideas SPECT scanner (Northridge, CA). SPECT data were acquired in 64 projections at 65 s per projection using medium energy pinhole collimators. A CT scan was performed in 512 projections at the end of each SPECT scan for anatomic co-registration. CT and SPECT scans were performed at 1, 4, 8, 24, and 48 h post-injection of [111In]XYIMSR-01. Imaging data sets were reconstructed using the manufacturer's software. Display of images utilized Amide software (Dice Holdings, Inc. NY).

Biodistribution

Mice bearing SK-RC-52 xenografts within the lower left flank were injected intravenously with 740 kBq (20 μCi) of [111In]XYIMSR-01 in 200 μL of PBS. For in vivo competition (binding specificity) studies, tumor-bearing mice were injected with 740 kBq (20 μCi) of [111In]XYIMSR-01 and 200 nmole of 1 in 200 μL of PBS concurrently. At 1 h, 4 h, 8 h, 24 h and 48 h post-injection, mice were sacrificed by cervical dislocation and the blood was immediately collected by cardiac puncture. Heart, lungs, pancreas, spleen, fat, brain, muscle, small intestines, liver, stomach, kidney, urinary bladder, and tumor were collected. Each organ was weighed and the tissue radioactivity was measured with an automated gamma counter (1282 Compugamma CS, Pharmacia/LKBNuclear, Inc., Mt. Waverly, Vic. Australia). The percentage of injected dose per gram of tissue (% ID/g) was calculated by comparison with samples of a standard dilution of the initial dose. All measurements were corrected for radioactive decay.

Data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Prism software (GraphPAD, San Diego, California) was used to determine statistical significance. Statistical significance was calculated using a paired t test. P-values < 0.0001 were considered significant.

SUPPLEMENTARY FIGURE AND TABLE

Acknowledgments

We thank CA134675 and CA197470 for financial support. We thank Dr. Yuchuan Wang for help with image processing and Ala Lisok for expert assistance with the biodistribution studies.

Footnotes

Disclaimers

none.

Sources of support

CA134675, CA197470.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

The authors declare no relevant conflicts of interest.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Srigley JR, Delahunt B, Eble JN, Egevad L, Epstein JI, Grignon D, Hes O, Moch H, Montironi R, Tickoo SK, Zhou M, Argani P, Panel IRT. The International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Vancouver Classification of Renal Neoplasia. The American journal of surgical pathology. 2013;37:1469–1489. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e318299f2d1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2015. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians. 2015;65:5–29. doi: 10.3322/caac.21254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Pichler M, Hutterer GC, Chromecki TF, Jesche J, Kampel-Kettner K, Eberhard K, Hoefler G, Pummer K, Zigeuner R. Trends of stage, grade, histology and tumour necrosis in renal cell carcinoma in a European centre surgical series from 1984 to 2010. Journal of clinical pathology. 2012;65:721–724. doi: 10.1136/jclinpath-2012-200797. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lipworth L, Morgans AK, Edwards TL, Barocas DA, Chang SS, Herrell SD, Penson DF, Resnick MJ, Smith JA, Clark PE. Renal cell cancer histologic subtype distribution differs by race and sex. BJU international. 2014 doi: 10.1111/bju.12950. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Umbreit EC, Shimko MS, Childs MA, Lohse CM, Cheville JC, Leibovich BC, Blute ML, Thompson RH. Metastatic potential of a renal mass according to original tumour size at presentation. BJU international. 2012;109:190–194. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10184.x. discussion 194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Shuch B, Amin A, Armstrong AJ, Eble JN, Ficarra V, Lopez-Beltran A, Martignoni G, Rini BI, Kutikov A. Understanding pathologic variants of renal cell carcinoma: distilling therapeutic opportunities from biologic complexity. European urology. 2015;67:85–97. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.04.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Grabmaier K, MC AdW, Verhaegh GW, Schalken JA, Oosterwijk E. Strict regulation of CAIX(G250/MN) by HIF-1alpha in clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Oncogene. 2004;23:5624–5631. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1207764. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Supuran CT. Carbonic anhydrases: novel therapeutic applications for inhibitors and activators. Nature reviews Drug discovery. 2008;7:168–181. doi: 10.1038/nrd2467. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Alterio V, Di Fiore A, D'Ambrosio K, Supuran CT, De Simone G. Multiple binding modes of inhibitors to carbonic anhydrases: how to design specific drugs targeting 15 different isoforms? Chemical reviews. 2012;112:4421–4468. doi: 10.1021/cr200176r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Bui MH, Seligson D, Han KR, Pantuck AJ, Dorey FJ, Huang Y, Horvath S, Leibovich BC, Chopra S, Liao SY, Stanbridge E, Lerman MI, Palotie A, Figlin RA, Belldegrun AS. Carbonic anhydrase IX is an independent predictor of survival in advanced renal clear cell carcinoma: implications for prognosis and therapy. Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research. 2003;9:802–811. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Atkins M, Regan M, McDermott D, Mier J, Stanbridge E, Youmans A, Febbo P, Upton M, Lechpammer M, Signoretti S. Carbonic anhydrase IX expression predicts outcome of interleukin 2 therapy for renal cancer. Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research. 2005;11:3714–3721. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-2019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Leibovich BC, Sheinin Y, Lohse CM, Thompson RH, Cheville JC, Zavada J, Kwon ED. Carbonic anhydrase IX is not an independent predictor of outcome for patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 2007;25:4757–4764. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.12.1087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Clare BW, Supuran CT. A perspective on quantitative structure-activity relationships and carbonic anhydrase inhibitors. Expert opinion on drug metabolism & toxicology. 2006;2:113–137. doi: 10.1517/17425255.2.1.113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ivanov S, Liao SY, Ivanova A, Danilkovitch-Miagkova A, Tarasova N, Weirich G, Merrill MJ, Proescholdt MA, Oldfield EH, Lee J, Zavada J, Waheed A, Sly W, Lerman MI, Stanbridge EJ. Expression of hypoxia-inducible cell-surface transmembrane carbonic anhydrases in human cancer. The American journal of pathology. 2001;158:905–919. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)64038-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Potter C, Harris AL. Hypoxia inducible carbonic anhydrase IX, marker of tumour hypoxia, survival pathway and therapy target. Cell cycle. 2004;3:164–167. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Oosterwijk E, Ruiter DJ, Hoedemaeker PJ, Pauwels EK, Jonas U, Zwartendijk J, Warnaar SO. Monoclonal antibody G 250 recognizes a determinant present in renal-cell carcinoma and absent from normal kidney. International journal of cancer Journal international du cancer. 1986;38:489–494. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910380406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Smaldone MC, Chen DY, Yu JQ, Plimack ER. Potential role of (124)I-girentuximab in the presurgical diagnosis of clear-cell renal cell cancer. Biologics : targets & therapy. 2012;6:395–407. doi: 10.2147/BTT.S30413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Coenen HH, Elsinga PH, Iwata R, Kilbourn MR, Pillai MR, Rajan MG, Wagner HN, Jr., Zaknun JJ. Fluorine-18 radiopharmaceuticals beyond [18F]FDG for use in oncology and neurosciences. Nuclear medicine and biology. 2010;37:727–740. doi: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2010.04.185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Cho SY, Gage KL, Mease RC, Senthamizhchelvan S, Holt DP, Jeffrey-Kwanisai A, Endres CJ, Dannals RF, Sgouros G, Lodge M, Eisenberger MA, Rodriguez R, Carducci MA, Rojas C, Slusher BS, Kozikowski AP, et al. Biodistribution, tumor detection, and radiation dosimetry of 18F-DCFBC, a low-molecular-weight inhibitor of prostate-specific membrane antigen, in patients with metastatic prostate cancer. Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine. 2012;53:1883–1891. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.112.104661. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Reilly RM, Lam K, Chan C, Levine M. Advancing Novel Molecular Imaging Agents from Preclinical Studies to First-in-Humans Phase I Clinical Trials in Academia-A Roadmap for Overcoming Perceived Barriers. Bioconjugate chemistry. 2015;26:625–632. doi: 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.5b00105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Pan J, Lau J, Mesak F, Hundal N, Pourghiasian M, Liu Z, Benard F, Dedhar S, Supuran CT, Lin KS. Synthesis and evaluation of 18F-labeled carbonic anhydrase IX inhibitors for imaging with positron emission tomography. Journal of enzyme inhibition and medicinal chemistry. 2014;29:249–255. doi: 10.3109/14756366.2013.773994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Akurathi V, Dubois L, Lieuwes NG, Chitneni SK, Cleynhens BJ, Vullo D, Supuran CT, Verbruggen AM, Lambin P, Bormans GM. Synthesis and biological evaluation of a 99mTc-labelled sulfonamide conjugate for in vivo visualization of carbonic anhydrase IX expression in tumor hypoxia. Nuclear medicine and biology. 2010;37:557–564. doi: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2010.02.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Lu G, Hillier SM, Maresca KP, Zimmerman CN, Eckelman WC, Joyal JL, Babich JW. Synthesis and SAR of novel Re/99mTc-labeled benzenesulfonamide carbonic anhydrase IX inhibitors for molecular imaging of tumor hypoxia. Journal of medicinal chemistry. 2013;56:510–520. doi: 10.1021/jm3015348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Doss M, Kolb HC, Walsh JC, Mocharla VP, Zhu Z, Haka M, Alpaugh RK, Chen DY, Yu JQ. Biodistribution and radiation dosimetry of the carbonic anhydrase IX imaging agent [(18)F]VM4-037 determined from PET/CT scans in healthy volunteers. Molecular imaging and biology: MIB : the official publication of the Academy of Molecular Imaging. 2014;16:739–746. doi: 10.1007/s11307-014-0730-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Rana S, Nissen F, Marr A, Markert A, Altmann A, Mier W, Debus J, Haberkorn U, Askoxylakis V. Optimization of a novel peptide ligand targeting human carbonic anhydrase IX. PloS one. 2012;7:e38279. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0038279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Peeters SG, Dubois L, Lieuwes NG, Laan D, Mooijer M, Schuit RC, Vullo D, Supuran CT, Eriksson J, Windhorst AD, Lambin P. [F]VM4–037 MicroPET Imaging and Biodistribution of Two In Vivo CAIX-Expressing Tumor Models. Molecular imaging and biology: MIB: the official publication of the Academy of Molecular Imaging. 2015:FVM4–037. doi: 10.1007/s11307-015-0831-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Wichert M, Krall N, Decurtins W, Franzini RM, Pretto F, Schneider P, Neri D, Scheuermann J. Dual-display of small molecules enables the discovery of ligand pairs and facilitates affinity maturation. Nature chemistry. 2015;7:241–249. doi: 10.1038/nchem.2158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Krall N, Scheuermann J, Neri D. Small targeted cytotoxics: current state and promises from DNA-encoded chemical libraries. Angewandte Chemie. 2013;52:1384–1402. doi: 10.1002/anie.201204631. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Franzini RM, Neri D, Scheuermann J. DNA-encoded chemical libraries: advancing beyond conventional small-molecule libraries. Accounts of chemical research. 2014;47:1247–1255. doi: 10.1021/ar400284t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Brenner S, Lerner RA. Encoded combinatorial chemistry. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1992;89:5381–5383. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.12.5381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Dower WJ, Barrett R.W, Gallop M.A., Needels M.C. Method of synthesizing diverse collections of oligomers. 1993. 1993.
  • 32.Wadas TJ, Wong EH, Weisman GR, Anderson CJ. Coordinating radiometals of copper, gallium, indium, yttrium, and zirconium for PET and SPECT imaging of disease. Chemical reviews. 2010;110:2858–2902. doi: 10.1021/cr900325h. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Cutler CS, Hennkens HM, Sisay N, Huclier-Markai S, Jurisson SS. Radiometals for combined imaging and therapy. Chemical reviews. 2013;113:858–883. doi: 10.1021/cr3003104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Alquicer G, Sedlak D, Byun Y, Pavlicek J, Stathis M, Rojas C, Slusher B, Pomper MG, Bartunek P, Barinka C. Development of a high-throughput fluorescence polarization assay to identify novel ligands of glutamate carboxypeptidase II. Journal of biomolecular screening. 2012;17:1030–1040. doi: 10.1177/1087057112451924. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Tureci O, Sahin U, Vollmar E, Siemer S, Gottert E, Seitz G, Parkkila AK, Shah GN, Grubb JH, Pfreundschuh M, Sly WS. Human carbonic anhydrase XII: cDNA cloning, expression, and chromosomal localization of a carbonic anhydrase gene that is overexpressed in some renal cell cancers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1998;95:7608–7613. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.13.7608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

oncotarget-06-33733-s001.pdf (1MB, pdf)

Articles from Oncotarget are provided here courtesy of Impact Journals, LLC

RESOURCES