Skip to main content
Open Forum Infectious Diseases logoLink to Open Forum Infectious Diseases
. 2015 Dec 23;3(1):ofv207. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofv207

Candida Arthritis: Analysis of 112 Pediatric and Adult Cases

Maria N Gamaletsou 1,2,3, Blandine Rammaert 4,5, Marimelle A Bueno 1, Nikolaos V Sipsas 2,3, Brad Moriyama 6, Dimitrios P Kontoyiannis 7, Emmanuel Roilides 3,8, Valerie Zeller 9, Saad J Taj-Aldeen 10, Andy O Miller 1,3,11, Ruta Petraitiene 1, Olivier Lortholary 3,4, Thomas J Walsh 1,3,11, for the International Osteoarticular Mycoses Consortium
PMCID: PMC4742637  PMID: 26858961

Abstract

Background.Candida arthritis is a debilitating form of deeply invasive candidiasis. However, its epidemiology, clinical manifestations, management, and outcome are not well understood.

Methods. Cases of Candida arthritis were reviewed from 1967 through 2014. Variables included Candida spp in joint and/or adjacent bone, underlying conditions, clinical manifestations, inflammatory biomarkers, diagnostic imaging, management, and outcome.

Results. Among 112 evaluable cases, 62% were males and 36% were pediatric. Median age was 40 years (range, <1–84 years). Most patients (65%) were not pharmacologically immunosuppressed. Polyarticular infection (≥3 joints) occurred in 31% of cases. Clinical manifestations included pain (82%), edema (71%), limited function (39%), and erythema (22%) with knees (75%) and hips (15%) most commonly infected. Median erythrocyte sedimentation rate was 62 mm/hr (10–141) and C reactive protein 26 mg/dL (0.5–95). Synovial fluid median white blood cell count was 27 500/µL (range, 100–220 000/µL) with 90% polymorphonuclear neutrophils (range, 24–98). Adjacent osteomyelitis was present in 30% of cases. Candida albicans constituted 63%, Candida tropicalis 14%, and Candida parapsilosis 11%. Most cases (66%) arose de novo, whereas 34% emerged during antifungal therapy. Osteolysis occurred in 42%, joint-effusion in 31%, and soft tissue extension in 21%. Amphotericin and fluconazole were the most commonly used agents. Surgical interventions included debridement in 25%, irrigation 10%, and drainage 12%. Complete or partial response was achieved in 96% and relapse in 16%.

Conclusion.Candida arthritis mainly emerges as a de novo infection in usually non-immunosuppressed patients with hips and knees being most commonly infected. Localizing symptoms are frequent, and the most common etiologic agents are C albicans, C tropicalis, and C parapsilosis. Management of Candida arthritis remains challenging with a clear risk of relapse, despite antifungal therapy.

Keywords: antifungal therapy, arthritis, Candida spp, diagnosis, invasive candidiasis


Among the causes of septic arthritis, fungal arthritis occurs infrequently and is most commonly caused by Candida species [1, 2]. Early reports suggested that Candida arthritis most commonly develops as a complication of disseminated candidiasis [36]. However, little is known about the clinical settings, laboratory features, radiological characteristics, or management of this uncommon infection.

Most reports of Candida arthritis are limited to individual case descriptions and relatively small case series. There is no comprehensive analysis that addresses the demographic, clinical, orthopedic, laboratory, microbiology, diagnostic imaging, and therapeutic aspects of this infection. Moreover, the possible mechanisms of infection that lead to Candida arthritis also are not well understood.

Therefore, we conducted a systematic review of 112 reported cases of Candida arthritis that fulfilled prespecified criteria. Our objective was to describe the demographics, mechanisms of infection, clinical manifestations, osteoarticular distribution, microbiology, inflammatory biomarkers, diagnostic imaging, management, and outcome of Candida arthritis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Search Strategy

We initiated our search by reviewing the English references as published in PubMed (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed) using the following key words: Candida, candidiasis, nonprosthetic arthritis, and osteomyelitis. We then carefully included only the well described references of single case reports or case series. After this initial series of reports was reviewed, individual references listed in each publication were again reviewed for ascertainment of additional case reports.

Study Population

We reviewed only the well described reported cases of native nonprosthetic Candida arthritis as published in the English literature within the study period 1967–2014. Data regarding epidemiology, clinical and radiological features, demographic characteristics, management, and outcome of the patients were collected and presented with descriptive statistics to determine the risk factors of Candida arthritis.

Criteria for Inclusion of Cases of Candida Arthritis

Cases selected in the initial screen were then included in the final analysis if the following data were available: demographics, underlying condition, documentation of native Candida arthritis and anatomical location of infection, microbiology data, radiology findings, symptomatology, therapeutic intervention, and outcome.

Definitions

Direct Inoculation

Direct inoculation is defined as seeding of synovial fluid by trauma or surgical manipulation.

Hematogenous

Hematogenous is defined as seeding of synovial fluid by the bloodborne route. Patients with documented Candida arthritis with candidemia or disseminated candidiasis were classified as having a hematogenous mechanism of infection of the involved joint. In the absence of documented candidemia or proven disseminated candidiasis, patients who did not have a clear history of contiguous infection were classified as having hematogenous infection of the joint as the most plausible mechanism.

Contiguous

Contiguous is defined as seeding of synovial fluid from an adjacent Candida infection.

Proven Candida Arthritis

Proven Candida arthritis is defined as a patient with evidence of a positive culture and/or histology from synovial fluid analysis.

Probable Candida Arthritis

Probable Candida arthritis is defined as a patient with evidence of a positive culture, and/or histology from other than a synovial fluid specimen, such as bone, cartilage, bone marrow, adjacent abscess, blood, central venous catheter, thrombus, tendon, disc, or operative samples, associated with compatible clinical and radiological features.

Breakthrough Candida Arthritis

Breakthrough Candida arthritis is defined as a patient receiving systemic antifungal agents before or at the onset of Candida arthritis.

De novo Candida Arthritis

De novo Candida arthritis is defined as a patient not receiving systemic antifungal therapy when the episode of Candida arthritis occurred.

Complete Response

Complete response is defined as complete resolution of clinical and radiological findings of arthritis, as assessed by 2 authors (M.N.G., M.A.B.) and, where warranted, a third author (T.J.W.).

Partial Response

Partial response is defined as partial resolution of clinical and/or radiological findings of arthritis or partial clinical improvement without availability of radiological data, as assessed by 2 authors (M.N.G., M.A.B.) and, where warranted, a third author (T.J.W.).

Data Collection and Analysis

Data regarding demographic characteristics, clinical and radiological features, inflammatory biomarkers, microbiology, management, and outcome of patients were collected and analyzed with descriptive statistics using Instat GraphPad (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA). Continuous variables were summarized using median and range, whereas categorical variables were summarized using frequencies and percentages. Differences in proportions were analyzed by Fisher's exact test. A P value of ≤.05 was considered to be significant.

RESULTS

Literature Review

Patients included in this study consisted of 112 nonprosthetic Candida arthritis cases as published in the English literature within the study period from 1967 to 2014. The first case of Candida arthritis was reported in 1967 [71]. Since this initial report through 2014, a total of 112 published cases [7103] of Candida arthritis fulfilled predefined criteria for evaluability. Thus, 112 evaluable cases were entered into the database.

Demographic Characteristics and Underlying Conditions

Amongst a total of 112 published cases of Candida arthritis, median age was 40 years (range, ≤1 month–84 years) (Table 1). Sixty-nine patients (62%) were males. Underlying conditions included surgery (35%), hematologic malignancies (16%), solid organ transplantation ([SOT] 9%), trauma (9%), intravenous drug use (9%), and solid tumors (4%). The majority of patients was not neutropenic nor was receiving corticosteroids or other pharmacological immunosuppression. Other conditions included central venous catheters, prior broad-spectrum antibiotics or antifungal agents, total parenteral nutrition, critical illness, use of illicit intravenous drugs or alcohol abuse, diabetes mellitus, hemodialysis, chronic pulmonary disease, and hypogammaglobulinemia. Ten patients (9%) had trauma or open wounds.

Table 1.

Demographic Characteristics and Underlying Conditions of Nonprosthetic Candida Arthritis (N = 112)

Demographic Features and Underlying Conditions N (%)
Median age (neonates-84 years) 40 years
Adults (≥19 years) 72 (64)
Pediatric population 40 (36)
 Neonates (≤1 months) 11 (10)
 Infants (≤12 months) 17 (15)
 Toddlers/Children (1–18 years) 10 (9)
Unknown age 2 (2)
Gender
 Females 37 (33)
 Males 69 (62)
 Unknown 6 (5)
Underlying conditions
 Solid tumors 5 (4)
 Hematologic malignancy 18 (16)
 Aplastic anemia 1 (1)
 Solid organ transplantation 10 (9)
 Bone marrow transplantation 3 (3)
 Surgery 39 (35)
  Facial/Neck 0 (0)
  Thoracic 4 (4)
  Abdominal 20 (18)
  Orthopedic 15 (13)
 Prior broad-spectrum antibiotics 73 (65)
 Prior antifungal agents 35 (31)
 Central venous catheter 17 (15)
 Open fracture 0 (0)
 Trauma/open wound 10 (9)
 HIV 4 (4)
 IVDU 10 (9)
 Alcohol abuse 5 (4)
 Hemodialysis 6 (5)
 Neutropenia 10 (9)
 Corticosteroids 20 (18)
 Pharmacological immunosuppression other than steroids 19 (17)
 Hypogammaglobulinemia 2 (2)
 Chronic Pulmonary Disease 4 (4)
 Abdominal abscess 1 (1)
 GI rupture 1 (1)
 Necrotic enterocolitis 2 (2)
 Congenital disorder (gastroschisis, Hirschsprung's disease) 7 (6)
 Total parenteral nutrition 14 (13)
 Diabetes mellitus 11 (10)
 Rheumatoid arthritis 2 (2)
 Intensive care unit 6 (5)
 None 3 (3)
Preexisting invasive candidiasis 71 (63)
 Candidemia 32 (29)
 Other forms of candidiasisa 39 (35)
Candidemia at time of diagnosis of Candida arthritis 12 (11)

Abbreviations: CNS, central nervous system; GI, gastrointestinal; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus;IVDU, intravenous drug use.

a Central venous catheter infection, candiduria, orbital candidiasis, and otitis, cutaneous, pulmonary, or CNS infection.

Candidemia and Arthritis

Before the diagnosis of Candida arthritis, 71 (63%) patients initially had candidemia or other form of candidiasis, including central venous catheter infection, candiduria, orbital candidiasis, and central nervous system infection (Table 1). Twelve patients (11%) also had candidemia at the time of diagnosis of Candida arthritis.

Classification of Candida Arthritis and Mechanisms of Articular Infection

Ninety-nine cases (88%) were proven and 13 cases (12%) were probable for Candida arthritis (Table 2). Apparent mechanisms of Candida arthritis consisted of hematogenous dissemination (81%) and direct inoculation (19%). Breakthrough Candida arthritis accounted for 34% versus de novo infection in 66%; these 2 groups were mutually exclusive.

Table 2.

Classification and Apparent Mechanisms of Nonprosthetic Candida Arthritis

Classification and Apparent Mechanisms N (%)
Classification of Candida arthritis
 Provena 99 (88)
 Probableb 13 (12)
Apparent mechanisms of infection
 Hematogenous 91 (81)
 Direct inoculation 21 (19)
 Contiguous 0 (0)
Relation to antifungal therapy
 Breakthrough Candida arthritis 38 (34)
 De novo Candida arthritis 74 (66)

a Proven = specimen from synovial fluid analysis that isolated Candida.

b Probable = specimen that isolated Candida other than synovial fluid, plus (+) local symptoms/(+) radiology. This specimen is bone tissue (3), or bone and cartilage (1), bone marrow (1), adjacent abscess (1), cartilage (1), thrombus (1), tendon (1), disc (1), or operative samples (1).

Osteoarticular Distribution

Monoarticular involvement occurred in 77 cases (69%), whereas 2 or more joints were infected in 35 cases (31%). Candida synovial arthritis involved the knee in 84 (75%) cases, hip in 17 (15%) cases, and shoulder in 8 (7%) patients (Table 3). The most frequently infected bone sites were femur (19%), tibia (13%), and humerus (8%).

Table 3.

Osteoarticular Involvement of Nonprosthetic Candida Arthritis

Osteoarticular Involvement N (%)
Number of Joints Infected
 1 joint infected 77 (69)
 2 joints infected 10 (9)
 ≥3 joints infected 25 (22)
Joint Involvement
 Intervertebral Joint 5 (4)
 Synovial Joint
  Knee 84 (75)
  Hip 17 (15)
  Shoulder 8 (7)
  Ankle 6 (5)
  Carpal 3 (3)
  Elbow 5 (4)
  Tarsal 2 (2)
  Wrist 2 (2)
  Costochondral 1 (1)
Type of Adjacent Bone Infecteda
 Total number of adjacent bones infected 34 (30)
 Femur 21 (19)
 Tibia 14 (13)
 Humerus 9 (8)
 Fibula 6 (5)
 Vertebra 6 (5)
 Ulna 4 (4)
 Ribs 3 (3)
 Radius 3 (3)
 Tarsus 3 (3)
 Metatarsus 2 (2)
 Carpus 2 (2)
 Otherb 6 (5)

a Some patients with polyarticular infection had more than 1 adjacent bone infected.

b Pelvis, sternum, clavicle, patella, talus, calcaneus.

Diagnostic Procedures

The following diagnostic approaches were used for patients with Candida arthritis: needle aspiration in 80 (71%); open biopsy or surgery in 12 (11%); and percutaneous, closed, or guided biopsy in 4 (4%) (Table 4). Candida species were detected predominantly via direct culture in 98 (88%) patients and less frequently by histopathology with or without culture (Table 4). One Candida species was recovered in 111 patients (99%) with arthritis, whereas in 1 (1%) patient more than 1 species of Candida was identified.

Table 4.

Diagnostic Procedures and Microbiology of Nonprosthetic Candida Arthritis

Diagnostic Procedures and Microbiology N (%)
Procedures
 Percutaneous/Closed/Guided biopsy 4 (4)
 Open biopsy/surgery 12 (11)
 Needle aspiration 80 (71)
 Swab of sinus tract or wound 1 (1)
 Synovial fluid aspiration 99 (88)
Microbiology/Histopathologya
 Only direct culture 98 (88)
 Direct culture and histology 13 (12)
 Unknown 1 (1)
Microbiological Identificationb
 Recovery of Candida spp
  1 Candida spp 111 (99)
  >1 Candida spp 1 (1)
 Identification of Candida spp
  Candida albicans 70 (63)
  Candida tropicalis 16 (14)
  Candida parapsilosis 12 (11)
  Candida krusei 4 (4)
  Candida glabrata 2 (2)
  Candida lusitaniae 2 (2)
  Candida guilliermondii 2 (2)
  Candida species: not specified 5 (4)

a Ten patients also had positive blood cultures; 1 or more microbiological or histopathological procedures were positive for Candida species per patient.

b One culture was mixed with Sporothrix schenckii.

Clinical Microbiology

Candida albicans was identified in 63% of 112 cases of arthritis (Table 4). Among non-albicans species, Candida tropicalis was recovered in 14%, Candida parapsilosis in 11%, Candida krusei in 4%, followed by Candida glabrata in 2%, Candida lusitaniae in 2%, Candida guilliermondii in 2%, and nonspecified Candida species in 4%.

Clinical Manifestations

Ninety-two (82%) of 112 patients complained of local pain and tenderness, whereas 79 (71%) had edema, and 25 (22%) patients presented with localized erythema (Table 5). Fever was present in 15 (13%) patients. Limitation of function and movement was documented in 44 (39%) patients. Sinus tracts and draining pus were observed in 6 (5%) patients.

Table 5.

Clinical Manifestations and Inflammatory Markers of Nonprosthetic Candida Arthritis

Clinical Manifestations and Inflammatory Markers N (%)
Clinical Manifestations
 Local symptoms
  Pain/Tenderness 92 (82)
  Edema 79 (71)
  Erythema 25 (22)
 Fever 15 (13)
 Limitation of function/movement 44 (39)
 Draining pus/sinus tract 6 (5)
Inflammatory markers
 Serum
  WBC (/mm3) 10 750 (160–36 500)
  PMNs (%) 45 (10–90)
  ESR (mm/h) 62 (10–141)
  CRP (mg/dL) 26 (0.5–95)
 Synovial Fluid
  Gram stain 10 (9%) (+)
  Culture 100 (89%) (+)
  Color 10 (9%) (purulent)
  Viscosity 6 (5%) (low)
13 (12%) (high)
  Clarity 15 (13%) (cloudy)
8 (7%) (turbid)
  Glucose (mg/dL) 59.5 (2–119)
  Protein (g/dL) 5.15 (2.8–6.5)
  WBC (/mm3) 27 500 (100–220 000)
  PMNs (%) 90 (24–98)

Abbreviations: CRP, C-reactive protein; ESR,erythrocyte sedimentation rate; PMNs,polymorphonuclear neutrophils; WBC, white blood cell.

Markers of Inflammation

The median white blood cell (WBC) counts were mildly elevated with a median of 10 750 cells/mm3 (range, 160–36 500 cells/mm3) with neutrophils consisting of a median of 45% (10%–90%). By comparison, median values of erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) were moderately elevated at 56 mm/hour (range, 10–118 mm/hour) and highly elevated at 28.9 mg/dL (range, 0.5–141 mg/dL), respectively, with a wide range of variation (Table 5). For the synovial fluid, there was leukocytosis with predominance of neutrophils.

Diagnostic Imaging

The most common radiological abnormalities in Candida arthritis were bone destruction (42%) and joint effusion (31%), followed by extension into soft tissues, decrease of articular space, osteoarthritis and periosteal reaction, and/or synovitis (Table 6). Extension into soft tissue was also observed in 21%.

Table 6.

Radiological Features of Nonprosthetic Candida Arthritis

Radiological Featuresa n/N (%)
 Osteolysis/bone destruction/bone erosion 30/72 (42)
 Joint effusion 22/72 (31)
 Extension into soft tissues 15/72 (21)
 Increase of nuclear scan uptake (Tc99m/Ga67) 14/16 (88)
 Decreased articular space 9/72 (13)
 Osteoarthritis 6/72 (8)
 Periosteal reaction/thickened synovium/synovitis 5/72 (7)
 Sequestrum 2/72 (3)
 Increase of signal intensity-T2 (magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]) 2/9 (22)
 Necrotic bone 2/72 (3)
 Increase of contrast-enhanced T1 (MRI)/T1 weighed 2/9 (22)
 Fracture 1/72 (1)
 Osteochondrosis/chondrocalcinosis 1/72 (1)
 Bone abscess 1/72 (1)
Muscle involvement (abscess/myositis/sinus in tissues) 1/72 (1)
 Radiological follow-up
 Improvement 30 (27)
 No improvement 3 (3)
 Not performed/reported 79 (71)

a Radiological methods for which sufficiently detailed data were available included conventional radiographs (72), radionuclide scanning (16), computed tomography (5), magnetic resonance (9), and (7) patients performed ultrasound.

Treatment and Outcome

Sixty-nine (62%) patients with Candida arthritis were treated with antifungal agents only, 1 (1%) underwent surgical treatment only, and 40 (36%) were treated with both antifungal therapy and surgery. The most commonly used combinations of antifungal agents were amphotericin B plus an azole or amphotericin B plus flucytosine (Table 7). There was no significant difference between patients who received surgical intervention plus medical therapy versus those who received medical therapy alone (P = .40). However, there were fewer deaths in those treated with antifungal therapy plus surgery (2 [4%]) versus those treated with antifungal therapy alone (12 [14%]), 3 of which were caused by disseminated candidiasis.

Table 7.

Treatment and Outcome of Nonprosthetic Candida Arthritis

Treatment and Outcome N (%)
Medical Treatmenta
 Only antifungal agents 69 (62)
 Only surgery 1 (1)
 Antifungal agents and surgery 40 (36)
Class of Antifungal Agent(s) Used
 Amphotericin B 37 (33)
 Triazoles 21 (19)
 Flucytosine 8 (7)
 Combinationsb 43 (38)
Duration of Medical Treatmentc
 Median duration in days (range, 14–436) 64 days
Surgical Intervention
 Debridement 28 (25)
 Drainage/aspiration 13 (12)
 Irrigation/lavage 11 (10)
 Amputation 3 (3)
 Bone grafting 1 (1)
 Insertion of metal hardware/prosthesis/arthroplasty 1 (1)
Outcome
 Complete response 87 (78)
 Partial response 21 (19)
 Failure 4 (4)
 Relapse 18 (16)
 Overall mortality 15 (13)

a Two cases received no therapy.

b Among the 43 cases of combination antifungal therapy, the following classes were used: polyene-azole (20), polyene-flucytosine (13), polyene-azole-flucytosine (3), azole-flucytosine (1), azole-echinocandin (2), polyene-azole-echinocandin (3), and polyene-echinocandin (1).

c Forty-six cases of unknown duration.

Median duration of therapy was 64 days (range, 14–436 days). Debridement was the most common surgical procedure (25%) followed by drainage/aspiration and irrigation/lavage. Complete response of Candida arthritis was documented in 87 patients (78%), partial response in 21 cases (19%), relapse in 18 (16%), and failure in 4 (4%) (Table 7).

Analysis of Pediatric and Adult Patients

The majority (70%) of all pediatric patients with Candida arthritis were neonates and infants. There was a significant difference in the pathogenetic mechanisms of infection, because 38 (95%) of 40 pediatric patients versus 53 (74%) of 72 adult patients (P = .005) followed a hematogenous dissemination (Table 8). Children achieved a higher complete response rate to antifungal therapy than adults (P = .09). There were no other significant differences in features of Candida arthritis between pediatric and adult populations.

Table 8.

Effect of Age on Effect by Site of Infection, Clinical Manifestations, and Outcome in Candida Arthritis

Population (N) Mechanism (N) Joint Sites (N) Number of Sites Infected/Patient (N) Clinical Manifestations (N) Therapeutic Intervention (N) Outcome (N)
  • All pediatric patients (40)

  • Neonates (11)

  • Hemato (5)

  • HSCT (2)

  • Hematogenous (38)*

  • Contiguous (0)

  • Direct inoculation (2)

  • Knee (31)

  • Hip (10)

  • Ankle (5)

  • Elbow (4)

  • Shoulder (3)

  • Others (4)

  • Wrist (1)

  • Carpus (1)

  • Costochondral (1)

  • Intervertebral (1)

  • 1 bone involved (20)

  • 2 bones involved (5)

  • ≥3 bones involved (15)

  • Local symptoms

  • pain (22)

  • Edema (31)

  • Erythema (6)

  • Limitation of movement (20)

  • Fever (7)

  • Draining pus (2)

  • Only AFT (28)

  • Only Surgery (0)

  • AFT + Surgery (11)

  • Debridement (4)

  • Amputation (1)

  • Drainage (5)

  • Lavage (4)

  • CR (35)

  • PR (5)a

  • Rel (3)

  • D (2)

  • Amphotericin (29)

  • Azoles (9)

  • 5-FC (14)

  • Echinocandins (2)

  • Adults (72)

  • Hematol (13)

  • HSCT (1)

  • SOT (10)

  • Hematogenous (53)*

  • Contiguous (0)

  • Direct inoculation (19)

  • Knee (53)

  • Hip (7)

  • Shoulder (5)

  • Others (11)

  • Intervertebral (4)

  • Carpus (2)

  • Tarsus (2)

  • Wrist (1)

  • Ankle (1)

  • Elbow (1)

  • 1 bone involved (57)

  • 2 bones involved (5)

  • ≥3 bones involved (10)

  • Local symptoms

  • pain (70)

  • Edema (48)

  • Erythema (19)

  • Limitation of movement (24)

  • Fever (8)

  • Draining pus (4)

  • Only AFT (41)

  • Only Surgery (1)

  • AFT + Surgery (29)

  • Debridement (24)

  • Amputation (2)

  • Drainage (8)

  • Lavage (7)

  • CR (52)

  • PR (16)

  • F (4)

  • Rel (15)

  • D (13)

  • Amphotericin (48)

  • Azoles (41)

  • 5-FC (11)

  • Echinocandins (4)

Abbreviations: AFT, antifungal therapy; CR, complete response; Hematol, hematological malignancies; HSCT, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; PR, partial response; Rel, relapsed; D, death; SOT, solid organ transplantation; 5-FC, 5-fluorocytosine.

a Of the 5 patients with PR, 2 patients ultimately died.

* P = .005.

In attempting to further understand potential differences in pediatric and adult patients with Candida arthritis, the frequencies of underlying diseases were analyzed and found to be similar (P = .23). There was a total of 18 of 40 pediatric patients who had immunocompromising conditions, including neonates, hematological malignancies, and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in comparison to 24 of 72 adults with hematological malignancies, HSCT, and SOT (Table 8).

DISCUSSION

This study of 112 cases of nonprosthetic Candida arthritis demonstrated a wide range of underlying conditions and ages from neonates to >80 years old. Whereas 34% were immunocompromised, the majority of patients had no apparent underlying immune impairment. Although the majority of patients had candidemia or other causes of invasive candidiasis before or during the appearance of arthritis, 29 (26%) patients had no preexisting invasive candidiasis or concomitant candidemia at the time of diagnosis of Candida arthritis. Most episodes (81%) of Candida arthritis arose from hematogenous dissemination. Candida albicans, C tropicalis, and C parapsilosis were the most common causes of Candida arthritis. Local pain, tenderness, and edema were commonly observed; however, fever was uncommon (13%). Likewise, WBC count, ESR, and CRP were only moderately elevated in most patients. The most common radiological abnormalities in Candida arthritis were bone destruction and joint effusion. A complete response to medical therapy with or without surgery was achieved in 78%; however, the remainder had only partial response, failure, or relapsed, suggesting the need for better therapeutic approaches for this infection.

An early diagnosis of Candida arthritis is important to prevent joint destruction, preserve function, and determine length of therapy. Understanding the host factors, clinical manifestations, inflammatory markers, diagnostic imaging, and microbiology are essential to achieving those objectives.

The age range, gender distribution, and underlying host factors of Candida arthritis reflect those of candidemia and deeply invasive candidiasis. Candida arthritis needs to be included within the differential diagnosis of osteoarticular symptoms in patients with underlying immunosuppression, including those with hematological malignancies, SOT, HSCT, and corticosteroid therapy. Likewise, surgery and trauma, particularly in patients receiving broad-spectrum antibiotics and with implanted central venous catheters, constitute other clinical settings in which Candida arthritis may emerge.

Candida arthritis may appear as a late manifestation of disseminated candidiasis. Kim et al [12] reported development of Candida arthritis 2 weeks after a chemotherapy-induced granulocytopenic period in the absence of any invasive manipulation. Joint swelling or arthralgia after recovery from neutropenia in febrile patients should raise clinical suspicion of fungal arthritis [4, 81].

The apparent pathogenesis of most cases of Candida arthritis is that of hematogenous dissemination to the joint. The mammalian synovium is extremely vascular and contains no limiting basement membrane, promoting easy access of blood contents to the synovial space. Therefore, hematogenous seeding of Candida may affect normal joints [104].

Although the exact pathogenesis of Candida arthritis remains to be further elucidated, the portal of entry may originate via contamination of central vascular catheters or from altered gastrointestinal microbial flora in the host with subsequent mucosal translocation and hematogenous dissemination [4, 24, 43]. Although infection of a joint is also possible via direct inoculation (surgery or intra-articular infection), hematogenous dissemination appears to be the most common mechanism of infection.

Hematogenous dissemination was significantly more common as a mechanism of Candida arthritis in children than in adults. This difference may be understood from the observation that all pediatric patients with Candida arthritis were neonates, infants, and toddlers. These populations are particularly vulnerable to the osteoarticular complications of candidemia, including Candida arthritis. The lack of closure of the epiphyseal plate in neonates, infants, and toddlers allows hematogenously disseminated organisms to extend into the joint space either directly through the articular cartilage or through the bony cortex of the joint capsule and then into the synovial space. Adults are more likely to have underlying surgical- and trauma-related portals of direct infection, hence accounting for these differences in pediatrics.

Because this study found that Candida arthritis arises in most patients with known invasive candidiasis or at the time of diagnosis of candidemia, an evaluation of musculoskeletal symptoms in overall assessment may reveal localization to 1 or more joints. However, because Candida arthritis also may arise de novo in more than one fourth of patients, one needs to have a high index of reaching this diagnosis in patients with the aforementioned host factors as the first manifestation of disseminated disease.

The clinical manifestations of Candida arthritis of pain, tenderness, and edema are common and should prompt an assessment for septic arthritis with Candida joint infection high in the differential diagnosis in the setting of a susceptible host with or without other evidence of invasive candidiasis. The knee, hip, and shoulder are the most frequently infected sites. Moderately elevated ESR and CRP further support the diagnosis in most but not all patients. The radiological features of bone destruction and joint effusion attest to the virulent nature of Candida arthritis but are not specific.

Because the clinical manifestations and inflammatory markers are not specific for Candida arthritis, arthrocentesis or arthroscopy is warranted for the definitive diagnosis. Given the paucity of fever and specific laboratory findings or radiographic features, diagnosis of fungal osteoarticular infections may be delayed in most cases [109111]. The differential diagnosis includes bacterial septic arthritis and crystalline arthritis. Although arthrocentesis is readily performed in the knee, the procedure is more challenging in the hip and shoulder. Synovial fluid analysis in Candida arthritis is characterized by acute inflammatory response with a predominance of neutrophils; however, this is not specific. By comparison, recovery of Candida spp provides a definitive diagnosis. It is noteworthy that Candida spp are seldom laboratory contaminants from normally sterile synovial fluid.

That C albicans and C tropicalis constituted the 2 most common organisms causing septic arthritis is consistent with their being the most virulent causes of hematogenous disseminated candidiasis [24, 104]. The paucity of cases of C glabrata arthritis, despite its constituting as much as one fourth of cases of candidemia, suggests that this organism may not have the necessary virulence factors needed to establish infection within synovial tissue. Possible virulence factors, such as adhesion molecules, cell wall hydrophobicity, as well as extracellular proteases and phospholipases differ in their properties and expression among Candida spp [111].

The objectives of treatment of Candida arthritis are to relieve symptoms, eradicate infection, prevent joint injury, and restore function. Unfortunately, there is no evidence-based standard treatment regimen for patients with fungal osteoarticular infections of native joints due to the heterogeneous spectrum of diseases and the relatively low frequency of this disease. Current guidelines recommend initial antifungal therapy with amphotericin B or fluconazole combined with surgical debridement [105]. Ambulatory antifungal therapy may be achieved with orally administered fluconazole. Medical therapy of Candida arthritis in this study most commonly began with amphotericin with or without combinations, such as flucytosine or fluconazole. Echinocandins were used as part of combination therapy in 6 patients but not used as monotherapy. However, given the activity of echinocandins on Candida biofilms [106108], primary therapy with an echinocandin is a rational approach for initial medical management of Candida arthritis.

Surgery may also be an important adjunct to medical management of Candida arthritis. Treatment of Candida arthritis in this series was successful in the majority of patients with medical therapy alone; however, surgical intervention was considered to be warranted in 36% of patients. Because synovial fluid analysis and radiological features of Candida arthritis reveal this infection to be a suppurative destructive process, the surgical procedures used included irrigation, drainage, and debridement.

Although there was no significant difference in therapeutic response between those who received combined medical plus surgical therapy versus medical therapy alone, there were more deaths and disseminated candidiasis in the latter. These differences may be due to a lack of source control or more immunocompromised host. That the overall responses were similar between the 2 groups does not necessarily justify medical therapy alone for all patients. We hypothesize that there are some patients who will benefit from antifungal therapy plus adjunctive surgical intervention, whereas others may respond to medical therapy alone. The data warrant that each patient with Candida arthritis be assessed individually for combination medical-surgical therapy versus medical therapy alone. We suggest that a prospective study may help to further define the factors guiding the decision for surgical intervention in Candida arthritis.

The rationale for medical therapy alone versus combined medical and surgical intervention in individual cases was not apparent in most reports. Although combined medical and surgical intervention is certainly considered a standard of care of septic arthritis, serious comorbidities could preclude surgery in some patients. That the overall therapeutic response was favorable in those treated with medical therapy alone, these data raise the question of whether there is a subset of patients who may be candidates for medical therapy on an individualized basis.

Lack of a favorable response to treatment with antibiotics in a possible septic arthritis, particularly in immunocompromised patients, should raise suspicion of a Candida osteoarticular infection. Prompt therapy in immunocompromised hosts presenting with acute arthritis should include not only antibacterial but also antifungal agents after diagnostic arthrocentesis.

An important pattern of therapeutic response was observed in those patients classified as “relapsed.” Upon discontinuation of a course of antifungal therapy, relapsed infection developed in 18 patients. However, all of such patients subsequently responded to a second course of antifungal therapy with or without further surgical intervention, suggesting that duration of therapy as well as adequate debridement and drainage are important for successful outcome. The optimal duration of antifungal therapy remains to be defined with individual considerations of immune impairments, type of joint, and adequacy of debridement. The report by Miller et al [112] also suggests that local intraoperative irrigation of an infected joint by amphotericin B may assure further local control.

Duration of therapy in this study extended a median period of 2 months. This duration is compatible with the previously reported length of therapy of approximately 3 months reported for Candida osteomyelitis [109]. That this duration may be decreased by aggressive joint irrigation or arthroscopic debridement is suggested by a recent study by Miller et al [112], who reported a median duration of approximately 2 months for treatment of Candida osteoarticular infections. Alternatively, induction therapy with an echinocandin and maintenance therapy with more potent triazoles, such as voriconazole, posaconazole, and isavuconazole, warrants further investigation for also reducing the duration of antifungal therapy.

This study design of Candida arthritis has several limitations. Due to the retrospective nature of the design, not all data points were uniformly obtained and documented. Although the study design is strengthened by the detail afforded in individual case reports, it also may be affected by publication bias, which may lead to the reporting of better outcomes. The lack of a denominator in the study design precludes establishing an estimate of incidence; however, this was not the objective of this study. Although the comprehensive nature of the study design from the earliest reported case to the present time increases an understanding of the clinical manifestations, it introduces variations in advances of imaging and treatment. Although a prospective, multicenter, case-controlled observational study would address many of these concerns, such a design for Candida arthritis would require years of data collection. Therefore, the study design used in this review provides for a large number of protocol-selected patients analyzed through a finely detailed database to advance our understanding of this uncommon osteoarticular infection.

CONCLUSIONS

In summary, this systematic review provides a comprehensive analysis of the demographic characteristics, host factors, clinical manifestations, inflammatory biomarkers, diagnostic imaging, microbiology, and treatment of 112 cases of Candida arthritis. A high index of clinical and microbiological suspicion of Candida spp in the differential diagnosis of septic arthritis in vulnerable hosts may facilitate the timely diagnosis and rapid initiation of the appropriate therapy.

Acknowledgments

T. J. W. is a Scholar of the Save Our Sick Children Foundation and a Scholar of the Sharp Family Foundation in Pediatric Emerging Infectious Diseases.

Financial support. This work was funded by Scholar of the Save Our Sick Children Foundation (to T. J. W.), Sharp Family Foundation (to T. J. W.), Special Account for Research Funds (to M. N. G. and N. V. S.) of the National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, and National Institutes of Health through an MD Anderson Cancer Center Support Grant (CA016672) (to D. P. K.).

Potential conflicts of interest. D. P. K. is a consultant and board member and received payment for lectures from Schering-Plough, Pfizer, and Astellas Pharma US. D. P. K. has also received grant support from Astellas Pharma US and Merck and has received an honorarium from Enzon Pharmaceuticals. T. J. W. has received research grants for experimental and clinical antimicrobial pharmacotherapeutics from Astellas, Cubist, Novartis, Pfizer, and Theravance. He also has served as consultant to Astellas, ContraFect, Cubist, Drais, iCo, Novartis, Pfizer, Methylgene, SigmaTau, and Trius. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed.

References

  • 1.Hansen BL, Andersen K. Fungal arthritis. A review. Scand J Rheumatol 1995; 24:248–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bariteau JT, Waryasz GR, McDonnell M et al. . Fungal osteomyelitis and septic arthritis. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2014; 22:390–401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Murray HW, Fialk MA, Roberts RB. Candida arthritis. A manifestation of disseminated candidiasis. Am J Med 1976; 60:587–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Fainstein V, Gilmore C, Hopfer RL et al. . Septic arthritis due to Candida species on patients with cancer: report of five cases and review of the literature. Rev Infect Dis 1982; 4:78–85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Chen JY. Neonatal candidiasis associated with meningitis and endophthalmitis. Acta Paediatr Jpn 1994; 36:261–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Muñoz-Fernández S, Maciá MA, Pantoja L et al. . Osteoarticular infection in intravenous drug abusers: influence of HIV infection and differences with non drug abusers. Ann Rheum Dis 1993; 52:570–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Newsom SW, Lee WR, Rees JR. Fatal fungal infection following open-heart surgery. Br Heart J 1967; 29:457–60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Larru B, Barrett DM, Gerber JS. Candida krusei arthritis in an adolescent with acute myelogenous leukemia. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2013; 32:1142–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Le Calloch R, Ianotto JC, Guillerm G, Tonnelier JM. Fungal arthritis of the hip in patient with aplastic anaemia. BMJ Case Rep 2013; 2013: pii: bcr2013008902. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Lee GW, Kim TH, Son JH. Primary Candida guilliermondii infection of the knee in a patient without predisposing factors. Case Rep Med 2012; 2012:375682. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Lu H, Marengo MF, Mihu CN et al. . Rare case of septic arthritis caused by Candida krusei: case report and literature review. J Rheumatol 2012; 39:1308–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kim SY, Lim JS, Kim DH et al. . Candida tropicalis arthritis of the elbow in a patient with Ewing's sarcoma that successfully responded to itraconazole. Korean J Pediatr 2011; 54:385–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Radike K, Kunzmann S, Abele-Horn M et al. . Osteoarticular infection by Candida albicans in an infant with cystic fibrosis. J Med Microbiol 2011; 60:1542–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Lee CH, Oh JM, Oh SR et al. . Candida arthritis after arthroscopic arthroplasty in a patient without predisposing factors. Open Rheumatol J 2010; 4:7–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Bland CM, Thomas S. Micafungin plus fluconazole in an infected knee with retained hardware due to Candida albicans. Ann Pharmacother 2009; 43:528–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kathresal A, Biundo J, Blais CM et al. . A rare case of Candida arthritis in a hemodialysis patient. Am J Med Sci 2008; 336:437–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Masoud M, Nasser NJ, Karban A, Edelstein S. Candida parapsilosis septic arthritis in a renal transplant patient. J Clin Rheumatol 2008; 14:56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Bariola JR, Saccente M. Candida lusitaniae septic arthritis: case report and review of the literature. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2008; 61:61–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Sili U, Yilmaz M, Ferhanoglu B, Mert A. Candida krusei arthritis in a patient with hematologic malignancy: successful treatment with voriconazole. Clin Infect Dis 2007; 45:897–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Jeragh A, Ahmad S, Naseem J, Khan ZU. Candida lusitaniae arthritis in an intravenous drug user. Mycoses 2007; 50:430–2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Wang HP, Yen YF, Chen WS et al. . An unusual case of Candida tropicalis and Candida krusei arthritis in a patient with acute myelogenous leukemia before chemotherapy. Clin Rheumatol 2007; 26:1195–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Legout L, Assal M, Rohner P et al. . Successful treatment of Candida parapsilosis (fluconazole-resistant) osteomyelitis with caspofungin in a HIV patient. Scand J Infect Dis 2006; 38:728–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Yang SC, Shao PL, Hsueh PR et al. . Successful treatment of Candida tropicalis arthritis, osteomyelitis and costochondritis with caspofungin and fluconazole in a recipient of bone marrow transplantation. Acta Paediatr 2006; 95:629–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Sim JP, Kho BC, Liu HS et al. . Candida tropicalis arthritis of the knee in a patient with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: successful treatment with caspofungin. Hong Kong Med J 2005; 11:120–3. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Lazzarini L, Manfrin V, De Lalla F. Candidal prosthetic hip infection in a patient with previous candidal septic arthritis. J Arthroplasty 2004; 19:248–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Vicari P, Feitosa Pinheiro R et al. . Septic arthritis as the first sign of Candida tropicalis fungaemia in an acute lymphoid leukemia patient. Braz J Infect Dis 2003; 7:426–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Kawanabe K, Hayashi H, Miyamoto M et al. . Candida septic arthritis of the hip in a young patient without predisposing factors. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2003; 85:734–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Turgut B, Vural O, Demir M, Kaldir M. Candida arthritis in a patient with chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) in blastic transformation, unresponsive to fluconazole, but treated effectively with liposomal amphotericin B. Ann Hematol 2002; 81:529–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Hacimustafaoğlu M, Cil E, Sarisözen B et al. . Bilateral septic arthritis of the knee joint in three children caused by unusual infectious agents. Pediatr Int 2001; 43:697–700. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Choi IS, Kim SJ, Kim BY et al. . Candida polyarthritis in a renal transplant patient: case report of a patient successfully treated with amphotericin B. Transplant Proc 2000; 32:1963–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Harris MC, Pereira GR, Myers MD et al. . Candidal arthritis in infants previously treated for systemic candidiasis during the newborn period: report of three cases. Pediatr Emerg Care 2000; 16:249–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Weigl JA. Candida arthritis in a premature infant treated successfully with oral fluconazole for six months. Ann Acad Med Singapore 2000; 29:253–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Zmierczak H, Goemaere S, Mielants H et al. . Candida glabrata arthritis: case report and review of the literature of Candida arthritis. Clin Rheumatol 1999; 18:406–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Gumbo T, Isada CM, Muschler GF, Longworth DL. Candida (Torulopsis) glabrata septic arthritis. Clin Infect Dis 1999; 29:208–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Trowbridge J, Ludmer LM, Riddle VD et al. . Candida lambica polyarthritis in a patient with chronic alcoholism. J Rheumatol 1999; 26:1846–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Azaceta G, Olave T, de los Martires LD et al. . Successful lipid-complexed amphotericin B treatment of Candida arthritis in a lymphoma patient. Rev Rhum Engl Ed 1999; 66:434–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Calvo Romero JM, Alvarez Vega JL, Salazar Vallinas JM, Ortega Alberdi R. Candida arthritis in an immunocompetent patient without predisposing factors. Clin Rheumatol 1998; 17:393–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Brooks DH, Pupparo F. Successful salvage of a primary total knee arthroplasty infected with Candida parapsilosis. J Arthroplasty 1998; 13:707–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Pérez-Gómez A, Prieto A, Torresano M et al. . Role of the new azoles in the treatment of fungal osteoarticular infections. Semin Arthritis Rheum 1998; 27:226–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Hacimustafaoglu M, Ener B, Tarim O et al. . Systemic candidiasis with acute Epstein-Barr virus infection. Acta Paediatr 1997; 86:1267–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Fukasawa N, Shirakura K. Candida arthritis after total knee arthroplasty--a case of successful treatment without prosthesis removal. Acta Orthop Scand 1997; 68:306–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Evdoridou J, Roilides E, Bibashi E, Kremenopoulos G. Multifocal osteoarthritis due to Candida albicans in a neonate: serum level monitoring of liposomal amphotericin B and literature review. Infection 1997; 25:112–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Weers-Pothoff G, Havermans JF, Kamphuis J et al. . Candida tropicalis arthritis in a patient with acute myeloid leukemia successfully treated with fluconazole: case report and review of the literature. Infection 1997; 25:109–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Swanson H, Hughes PA, Messer SA et al. . Candida albicans arthritis one year after successful treatment of fungemia in a healthy infant. J Pediatr 1996; 129:688–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Rovinsky D, Williams GR Jr, Iannotti JP, Ragsdale BD. Autoimmune arthritis caused by Candida septic arthritis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 1995; 4:472–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Lafont A, Olivé A, Gelman M et al. . Candida albicans spondylodiscitis and vertebral osteomyelitis in patients with intravenous heroin drug addiction. Report of 3 new cases. J Rheumatol 1994; 21:953–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Lasday SD, Jay RM. Candida osteomyelitis. J Foot Ankle Surg 1994; 33:173–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Cuende E, Barbadillo C, E-Mazzucchelli R et al. . Candida arthritis in adult patients who are not intravenous drug addicts: report of three cases and review of the literature. Semin Arthritis Rheum 1993; 22:224–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Barbara JA, Clarkson AR, LaBrooy J et al. . Candida albicans arthritis in a renal allograft recipient with an interaction between cyclosporin and fluconazole. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1993; 8:263–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Christensson B, Ryd L, Dahlberg L, Lohmander S. Candida albicans arthritis in a nonimmunocompromised patient. Complication of placebo intraarticular injections. Acta Orthop Scand 1993; 64:695–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Nouyrigat P, Baume D, Blaise D et al. . Candida arthritis treated with intra-articular amphotericin B. Eur J Med 1993; 2:124–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Weisse ME, Person DA, Berkenbaugh JT Jr. Treatment of Candida arthritis with flucytosine and amphotericin B. J Perinatol 1993; 13:402–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Marcus J, Grossman ME, Yunakov MJ, Rappaport F. Disseminated candidiasis, Candida arthritis, and unilateral skin lesions. J Am Acad Dermatol 1992; 26:295–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Pizarro S, Barile L, Fraga A, Medina F. Favorable outcome with ketoconazole in Candida septic arthritis. J Rheumatol 1992; 19:328. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Hermann E, Mayet WJ, Klein O et al. . Candida arthritis: cellular immune responses of synovial fluid and peripheral blood lymphocytes to Candida albicans. Ann Rheum Dis 1991; 50:697–701. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Edelstein H, McCabe R. Candida albicans septic arthritis and osteomyelitis of the sternoclavicular joint in a patient with human immunodeficiency virus infection. J Rheumatol 1991; 18:110–1. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.O'Meeghan T, Varcoe R, Thomas M, Ellis-Pegler R. Fluconazole concentration in joint fluid during successful treatment of Candida albicans septic arthritis. J Antimicrob Chemother 1990; 26:601–2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Meyer RD, Gaut PL. Candidal pyarthrosis in an AIDS patient. Scand J Infect Dis 1990; 22:607–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Campen DH, Kaufman RL, Beardmore TD. Candida septic arthritis in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 1990; 17:86–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Lambertus M, Thordarson D, Goetz MB. Fungal prosthetic arthritis: presentation of two cases and review of the literature. Rev Infect Dis 1988; 10:1038–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Levine M, Rehm SJ, Wilde AH. Infection with Candida albicans of a total knee arthroplasty. Case report and review of the literature. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1988; 226:235–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.De Clerck L, Dequeker J, Westhovens R, Hauglustaine D. Candida parapsilosis in a patient receiving chronic hemodialysis. J Rheumatol 1988; 15:372–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Nguyen VQ, Penn RL. Candida krusei infectious arthritis. A rare complication of neutropenia. Am J Med 1987; 83:963–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Bisbe J, Vilardell J, Valls M et al. . Transient fungemia and Candida arthritis due to Candida zeylanoides. Eur J Clin Microbiol 1987; 6:668–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Smith SM, Lee EY, Cobbs CJ, Eng RH. Unusual features of arthritis caused by Candida parapsilosis. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1987; 111:71–3. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Thobani SU, George RH. Candida albicans arthritis in an infant. J Infect 1986; 13:163–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Gambrioli PL, Maggi F, Minola R. Candida arthritis of the knee. Case report. Ital J Orthop Traumatol 1986; 12:245–52. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Katzenstein D. Isolated Candida arthritis: report of a case and definition of a distinct clinical syndrome. Arthritis Rheum 1985; 28:1421–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Mandel DR, Segal AM, Wysenbeek AJ, Calabrese LH. Two unusual strains of Candida arthritis. Am J Med Sci 1984; 288:25–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Duquesnoy B, Fournier E, Berniere L, Delcambre B. Ketoconazole for treatment of Candida arthritis. J Rheumatol 1984; 11:105–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Ward RM, Sattler FR, Dalton AS Jr. Assessment of antifungal therapy in an 800-gram infant with Candida arthritis and osteomyelitis. Pediatrics 1983; 72:234–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Pope TL., Jr Pediatric Candida albicans arthritis: case report of hip involvement with a review of the literature. Prog Pediatr Surg 1982; 15:271–83. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Arnold HJ, Dini A, Jonas G, Zorn EL. Candida albicans arthritis in a healthy adult. South Med J 1981; 74:84–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Yousefzadeh DK, Jackson JH. Neonatal and infantile Candida arthritis with or without osteomyelitis: a clinical and radiographical review of 21 cases. Skeletal Radiol 1980; 5:77–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Gerster JC, Glauser MP, Delacretaz F, Nguyen T. Erosive Candida arthritis in a patient with disseminated candidiasis. J Rheumatol 1980; 7:911–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Miro JM, Brancos MA, Abello R et al. . Costochondral involvement in systemic candidiasis in heroin addicts: clinical, scintigraphic, and histologic features in 26 patients. Arthritis Rheum 1988; 31:793–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Rao HK, Myers GJ. Candida meningitis in the newborn. South Med J 1979; 72:1468–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Svirsky-Fein S, Langer L, Milbauer B et al. . Neonatal osteomyelitis caused by Candida tropicalis. Report of two cases and review of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1979; 61:455–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Ginzler E, Meisel AD, Munters M, Kaplan D. Candida arthritis secondary to repeated intra-articular corticosteroids. N Y State J Med 1979; 79:392–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Yarchoan R, Davies SF, Fried J, Mahowald ML. Isolated Candida parapsilosis arthritis in a heroin addict. J Rheumatol 1979; 6:447–50. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Bayer AS, Guze LB. Fungal arthritis. I. Candida arthritis: diagnostic and prognostic implications and therapeutic considerations. Semin Arthritis Rheum 1978; 8:142–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Farrell JB, Person DA, Lidsky MD et al. . Candida tropicalis arthritis - assessment of amphotericin B therapy. J Rheumatol 1978; 5:267–71. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Imbeau SA, Hanson J, Langejans G, D'Alessio D. Flucytosine treatment of Candida arthritis. JAMA 1977; 238:1395–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Specht EE. Candida pyarthrosis of the hip and renal homotransplant. Report of a case treated by femoral head and neck resection and 5-fluorocytosine. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1977; 126:176–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Ide A, Jacobelli S, Zenteno G. Candida arthritis associated with positive birefringent crystals without chondrocalcinosis. J Rheumatol 1977. 4:327–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Businco L, Iannaccone G, Del Principe D et al. . Disseminated arthritis and osteitis by Candida albicans in a two month old infant receiving parenteral nutrition. Acta Paediatr Scand 1977; 66:393–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Meberg A, Langslet A, Sovde A, Kolstad A. Candida-septicemia with chorioretinitis, osteomyelitis and arthritis treated with systemic miconazole and intraarticular amphotericin B. Mykosen 1977; 20:257–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Keller MA, Sellers BB Jr, Melish ME et al. . Systemic candidiasis in infants: a case presentation and literature review. Am J Dis Child 1977; 131:1260–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Muscolo DL, Carbo L, Aponte-Tinao LA, Ayerza MA, Makino A. Massive bone loss from fungal infection after anterior cruciate ligament arthroscopic reconstruction. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009; 467:2420–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Lertratanakul Y, Glassford GH, Rubinstein HM. Arthritis and osteomyelitis due to Candida albicans: a case report. J Rheumatol 1977; 4:317–20. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Marmor L, Peter JB. Candida arthritis of the knee joint. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1976; 118:133–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Fitzgerald E, Lloyd-Still J, Gordon SL. Candida arthritis. A case report and review of the literature. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1975; 106:143–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Poplack DG, Jacobs SA. . Candida arthritis treated with amphotericin B. J Pediatr 1975; 87:989–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Freeman JB, Wienke JW, Soper RT. Candida osteomyelitis associated with intravenous alimentation. J Pediatr Surg 1974; 9:783–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Hill HR, Mitchell TG, Matsen JM, Quie PG. Recovery from disseminated candidiasis in a premature neonate. Pediatrics 1974; 53:748–52. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Noble HB, Lyne ED. Candida osteomyelitis and arthritis from hyperalimentation therapy. Case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1974; 56:825–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Umber J, Chapman MW, Drutz DJ. Candida pyarthrosis. Report of a case and results of treatment with 5-fluorocytosine. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1974; 56:1520–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Lindström FD, Lindholm T. Candida albicans arthritis treated with flucytosine. Ann Intern Med 1973; 79:131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Noyes FR, McCabe JD, Fekety FR Jr. Acute Candida arthritis. Report of a case and use of amphotericin B. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1973; 55:169–76. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Klein JD, Yamauchi T, Horlick SP. Neonatal candidiasis, meningitis, and arthritis: observations and a review of the literature. J Pediatr 1972; 81:31–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Lachman RS, Yamauchi T, Klein J. Neonatal systemic candidiasis and arthritis. Radiology 1972; 105:631–2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Adler S, Randall J, Plotkin SA. Candida osteomyelitis and arthritis in a neonate. Am J Dis Child 1972; 123:595–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Pruitt AW, Achord JL, Fales FW, Patterson JH. Glucose-galactose malabsorption complicated by monilial arthritis. Pediatrics 1969; 43:106–10. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Kumashi PR, Safdar A, Chamilos G et al. . Fungal osteoarticular infections in patients treated at a comprehensive cancer centre: a 10-year retrospective review. Clin Microbiol Infect 2006; 12:621–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Pappas PG, Kauffman CA, Andes D et al. ; Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clinical practice guidelines for the management of candidiasis: 2009 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 2009; 48:503–35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Nett JE, Crawford K, Marchillo K, Andes DR. Role of Fks1p and matrix glucan in Candida albicans biofilm resistance to an echinocandin, pyrimidine, and polyene. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2010; 54:3505–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Simitsopoulou M, Peshkova P, Tasina E et al. . Species-specific and drug-specific differences in susceptibility of Candida biofilms to echinocandins: characterization of less common bloodstream isolates. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2013; 57:2562–70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Kuhn DM, George T, Chandra J et al. . Antifungal susceptibility of Candida biofilms: unique efficacy of amphotericin B lipid formulations and echinocandins. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2002; 46:1773–80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Gamaletsou MN, Kontoyiannis DP, Sipsas NV et al. . Candida osteomyelitis: analysis of 207 pediatric and adult cases (1970–2011). Clin Infect Dis 2012; 55:1338–51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Arias F, Meta-Essayag S, Landaeta ME et al. . Candida albicans osteomyelitis: case report and literature review. Int J Infect Dis 2004; 8:307–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Gamaletsou MN, Rammaert B, Bueno MA et al. . Epidemiology, clinical manifestations, management and outcome of 179 cases of Aspergillus osteomyelitis. J Infect 2014; 68:478–93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Miller AO, Gamaletsou MN, Henry M et al. . Successful treatment of Candida osteoarticular infections with limited duration of antifungal therapy and orthopedic surgical intervention. Infect Dis (Lond) 2015; 47:144–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Open Forum Infectious Diseases are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES