Skip to main content
Genome Announcements logoLink to Genome Announcements
. 2016 Feb 4;4(1):e01576-15. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.01576-15

Draft Genome Sequences of Four Enterococcus faecium Strains Isolated from Argentine Cheese

Gabriela P Martino a,b, Ingrid M Quintana a,b, Martín Espariz a,b, Victor S Blancato a,b, Gabriel Gallina Nizo b,c, Luis Esteban b,c, Christian Magni a,b,
PMCID: PMC4742676  PMID: 26847907

Abstract

We report the draft genome sequences of four Enterococcus faecium strains isolated from Argentine regional cheeses. These strains were selected based on their technological properties, i.e., their ability to produce aroma compounds (diacetyl, acetoin, and 2,3-butanediol) from citrate. The goal of our study is to provide further genetic evidence for the rational selection of enterococci strains based on their pheno- and genotype in order to be used in cheese production.

GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT

Enterococcus faecium is part of the human and animal gut microbiota. Also, it is widely distributed in diverse habitats such as soil, water, vegetables, and food. These enterococci are an important source of biodiversity in traditional fermented foods (1, 2). However, they have emerged in recent years as opportunistic nosocomial pathogens (3, 4). The genus Enterococcus comprises Gram-positive cocci that are catalase-negative, able to grow at 6.5% wt/vol NaCl, 45°C, pH 9.6, in bile esculin (40%) agar medium, tolerant to tellurite, and positive for leucine aminopeptidase and pyrrolidonyl arylamidase enzymes. Here, we report four strains isolated from regional cheeses pheno- and genotypically characterized as E. faecium (5). To gain better insight into the genetic diversity of the four strains, their whole-genome sequences were determined. In Table 1 we summarize the whole-genome data of the four enterococci strains: IQ110, IQ23, GM70, and GM75. Citrate metabolism in these strains was described by Martino et al. (5). Briefly, genetic evidence of citrate metabolism was obtained through PCR analysis determining the presence of the citrate lyase complex (citE and citF genes). Also, citrate radioactive uptake was determined in resting cells of E. faecium strains, as well as C4 compound production in medium supplemented with citrate. Cellular aggregates were detected in liquid medium and remained insoluble despite mechanical disruption (5).

TABLE 1 .

Summary of information for the whole genomes of four Enterococcus faecium strains

Strain Phenotype/genotypea Genome size (bp)b GC (%)b CDSs/RNAsb Accession no.
IQ23 Cit+, Agg+ 3,124,007 37.7 3,052/69 LKPF00000000
IQ110 Cit, Agg 2,757,341 37.9 2,776/69 LKPG00000000
GM70 Cit+, Agg 2,696,915 38.0 2,741/65 LKPH00000000
GM75 Cit+ Agg 2,848,961 38.1 2,986/92 LKPI00000000
a

Cit+: citrate metabolism was determined by PCR amplification of the citrate lyase genes citE and citF, citrate uptake, and Voges-Proskaur reaction (5). Agg+ phenotype: cellular aggregates insoluble despite mechanical disruption.

b

The genome size, GC content, and putative coding sequences (CDSs)/RNAs were predicted by RAST automated service (8).

Genomic DNA of the E. faecium strains was extracted using the Wizard genomic DNA purification kit (Promega). The genome sequences were determined using an Illumina HiSeq 2000 platform (MR DNA). De novo assembly was performed with SeqMan NGen (DNASTAR Inc.). Through BLASTn analysis (all versus all), contigs shorter than 1,000 bp, with higher than 99% identity to other sequences and already contained in a longer contig were deleted. The remaining contigs were ordered and oriented with Advanced Pipmaker (6) and Mauve version 2.3.1 (7). Genome annotation was performed using RAST (Rapid Annotations using Subsystem Technology) (8).

This report will contribute to understanding the positive and negative impact of E. faecium in cheese fermentation. Furthermore, comparative whole-genomic analysis of enterococci will improve our knowledge of this controversial group of microorganisms and the evolutionary mechanisms involved in their adaptation to specific niches, and it will assist in evaluating the putative use of selected E. faecium strains as adjunct cultures for cheese production.

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.

The draft genome sequences of the Enterococcus faecium strains described here have been deposited at DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank under the accession numbers given in Table 1.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by grants from the Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica (ANPCyT and PICT 2014-1513 and PICT 2014-3482, Argentina) and CONICET (PIP 2012-2014). G.P.M. and I.M.Q. are fellows of CONICET; V.S.B., M.E., and C.M. are researchers at the same institution.

Footnotes

Citation Martino GP, Quintana IM, Espariz M, Blancato VS, Gallina Nizo G, Esteban L, Magni C. 2016. Draft genome sequences of four Enterococcus faecium strains isolated from Argentine cheese. Genome Announc 4(1):e01576-15. doi:10.1128/genomeA.01576-15.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Foulquié Moreno MR, Sarantinopoulos P, Tsakalidou E, De Vuyst L. 2006. The role and application of enterococci in food and health. Int J Food Microbiol 106:1–24. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2005.06.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Giraffa G. 2003. Functionality of enterococci in dairy products. Int J Food Microbiol 88:215–222. doi: 10.1016/S0168-1605(03)00183-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Arias CA, Murray BE. 2012. The rise of the Enterococcus: beyond vancomycin resistance. Nat Rev Microbiol 10:266–278. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2761. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Giraffa G. 2002. Enterococci from foods. FEMS Microbiol Rev 26:163–171. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2002.tb00608.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Martino GP, Quintana IM, Esparíz M, Blancato VS, Magni C. 2015. Aroma compounds generation in citrate metabolism of Enterococcus faecium: genetic characterization of type I citrate gene cluster. Int J Food Microbiol 218:27–37. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2015.11.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Schwartz S, Zhang Z, Frazer KA, Smit A, Riemer C, Bouck J, Gibbs R, Hardison R, Miller W. 2000. PipMaker—a Web server for aligning two genomic DNA sequences. Genome Res 10:577–586. doi: 10.1101/gr.10.4.577. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Darling AE, Mau B, Perna NT. 2010. progressiveMauve: multiple genome alignment with gene gain, loss and rearrangement. PLoS One 5:e11147. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Overbeek R, Olson R, Pusch GD, Olsen GJ, Davis JJ, Disz T, Edwards RA, Gerdes S, Parrello B, Shukla M, Vonstein V, Wattam AR, Xia F, Stevens R. 2014. The SEED and the Rapid Annotation of microbial genomes using Subsystems Technology (RAST). Nucleic Acids Res 42:D206–D214. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt1226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genome Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES