Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Thorax logoLink to Thorax
. 1995 Apr;50(4):371–375. doi: 10.1136/thx.50.4.371

Maximal values of sniff nasal inspiratory pressure in healthy subjects.

C Uldry 1, J W Fitting 1
PMCID: PMC474280  PMID: 7785009

Abstract

BACKGROUND--Inspiratory muscle strength is often better reflected by oesophageal pressure during a maximal sniff (sniff POES) than by maximal inspiratory pressure (PImax). Sniff POES can be estimated non-invasively by measuring the sniff nasal inspiratory pressure (SNIP). The aim was to establish maximal normal values for the SNIP and to compare them with PImax. METHODS--One hundred and sixty healthy subjects (80 men) aged 20-80 years were recruited. All subjects had a forced vital capacity (FVC) of > 80%, a forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1)/FVC of > 85% predicted value, and a body mass index of 18-31 kg/m2. Because PImax is known to be reduced in the supine posture, the SNIP was measured in both the sitting and the supine positions. PImax sustained over one second was measured from functional residual capacity (FRC) in the sitting position with a standard flanged mouthpiece during four manoeuvres. SNIP was measured from FRC in the sitting and supine positions using a catheter through a plug occluding one nostril during 10 maximal sniffs through the contralateral nostril. For each test the largest pressure measured in cm H2O was taken into account. RESULTS--For both men and women maximal SNIP was negatively correlated with age, and was similar in the sitting and the supine positions. In the sitting position maximal SNIP was greater or equal to PImax in 107 of 160 subjects. The mean (SD) ratio SNIP/PImax was 1.08 (0.22) in men and 1.17 (0.29) in women. CONCLUSIONS--Normal values of maximal SNIP can be predicted from age and sex. Maximal SNIP is similar in the sitting and the supine position and is significantly higher than PImax in healthy subjects. The low level of agreement between maximal SNIP and PImax indicates that the two manoeuvres are not interchangeable but complementary.

Full text

PDF
371

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. AGOSTONI E., RAHN H. Abdominal and thoracic pressures at different lung volumes. J Appl Physiol. 1960 Nov;15:1087–1092. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1960.15.6.1087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Black L. F., Hyatt R. E. Maximal respiratory pressures: normal values and relationship to age and sex. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1969 May;99(5):696–702. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1969.99.5.696. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bland J. M., Altman D. G. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986 Feb 8;1(8476):307–310. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bridger G. P., Proctor D. F. Maximum nasal inspiratory flow and nasal resistance. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1970 Jun;79(3):481–488. doi: 10.1177/000348947007900308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gandevia S. C., Gorman R. B., McKenzie D. K., Southon F. C. Dynamic changes in human diaphragm length: maximal inspiratory and expulsive efforts studied with sequential radiography. J Physiol. 1992 Nov;457:167–176. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1992.sp019370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Haight J. S., Cole P. The site and function of the nasal valve. Laryngoscope. 1983 Jan;93(1):49–55. doi: 10.1288/00005537-198301000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Heijdra Y. F., Dekhuijzen P. N., van Herwaarden C. L., Folgering H. T. Differences between sniff mouth pressures and static maximal inspiratory mouth pressures. Eur Respir J. 1993 Apr;6(4):541–546. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hochberg Y., Benjamini Y. More powerful procedures for multiple significance testing. Stat Med. 1990 Jul;9(7):811–818. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780090710. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Héritier F., Perret C., Fitting J. W. Esophageal and mouth pressure during sniffs with and without nasal occlusion. Respir Physiol. 1991 Dec;86(3):305–313. doi: 10.1016/0034-5687(91)90102-o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Héritier F., Rahm F., Pasche P., Fitting J. W. Sniff nasal inspiratory pressure. A noninvasive assessment of inspiratory muscle strength. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1994 Dec;150(6 Pt 1):1678–1683. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.150.6.7952632. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Koulouris N., Mulvey D. A., Laroche C. M., Sawicka E. H., Green M., Moxham J. The measurement of inspiratory muscle strength by sniff esophageal, nasopharyngeal, and mouth pressures. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1989 Mar;139(3):641–646. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/139.3.641. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Laroche C. M., Mier A. K., Moxham J., Green M. The value of sniff esophageal pressures in the assessment of global inspiratory muscle strength. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1988 Sep;138(3):598–603. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/138.3.598. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Mulvey D. A., Elliott M. W., Koulouris N. G., Carroll M. P., Moxham J., Green M. Sniff esophageal and nasopharyngeal pressures and maximal relaxation rates in patients with respiratory dysfunction. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1991 May;143(5 Pt 1):950–953. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/143.5_Pt_1.950. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Nava S., Ambrosino N., Crotti P., Fracchia C., Rampulla C. Recruitment of some respiratory muscles during three maximal inspiratory manoeuvres. Thorax. 1993 Jul;48(7):702–707. doi: 10.1136/thx.48.7.702. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Thorax are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES