Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Pathology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Pathology
. 1969 Nov;22(6):644–648. doi: 10.1136/jcp.22.6.644

Sensitivity of Gram-negative bacilli to ampicillin after six years' clinical use

B Slocombe 1, R Sutherland 1
PMCID: PMC474333  PMID: 4983462

Abstract

A total of 1,102 clinical isolates of Gram-negative bacilli was obtained from four hospitals during 1967 and these cultures were tested for sensitivity to ampicillin. Approximately 80% of the strains of Escherichia coli and 90% of the strains of Proteus mirabilis, the two organisms most frequently isolated, were sensitive to ampicillin. Klebsiella-Enterobacter species and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were generally insensitive. Comparison of these results with data obtained in an earlier study with Gram-negative organisms isolated in 1961 showed that there had been no significant increase in the incidence of resistance of Gram-negative bacilli to ampicillin during the period 1961-67.

The majority of ampicillin-resistant strains of E. coli isolated in 1967 transferred ampicillin resistance to a sensitive strain of E. coli K12. Only four ampicillin-resistant strains of E. coli isolated in 1961 were available for transferable resistance tests but all four strains transferred ampicillin resistance. Infective or transferable resistance was therefore a feature of ampicillin resistance of certain Gram-negative bacteria before ampicillin became generally available for clinical use.

Full text

PDF
644

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bulger R. J., Roberts C. E., Sherris J. C. Changing incidence of antibiotic resistance among Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Aerobacter-Klebsiella, and Pseudomonas encountered in a teaching hospital over a 7-year period. Antimicrob Agents Chemother (Bethesda) 1966;6:42–46. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. COWAN S. T., STEEL K. J. Diagnostic tables for the common medical bacteria. J Hyg (Lond) 1961 Sep;59:357–372. doi: 10.1017/s0022172400039024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Petersdorf R. G., Turck M. Kanamycin in urinary tract infections. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1966 Jun 14;132(2):834–841. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1966.tb43002.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. SUTHERLAND R., ROLINSON G. N. ACTIVITY OF AMPICILLIN IN VITRO COMPARED WITH OTHER ANTIBIOTICS. J Clin Pathol. 1964 Jul;17:461–465. doi: 10.1136/jcp.17.4.461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Watt P. J., Okubadejo O. A. Changes in incidence and aetiology of bacteraemia arising in hospital practice. Br Med J. 1967 Jan 28;1(5534):210–211. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.5534.210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Pathology are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES