Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Thorax logoLink to Thorax
. 1994 Feb;49(2):175–178. doi: 10.1136/thx.49.2.175

Evaluation of a new electronic spirometer: the vitalograph "Escort" spirometer.

N Wiltshire 1, A H Kendrick 1
PMCID: PMC474340  PMID: 8128409

Abstract

BACKGROUND--The "Escort" spirometer is a lightweight, hand held spirometer employing a Fleisch pneumotachograph. Measurements of forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), and peak expiratory flow (PEF) are obtained from a single FVC manoeuvre. Results are displayed on a small liquid crystal display, but there is no graphical display. The performance of the Escort spirometer has been compared with that of a wedge bellows spirometer (Vitalograph S model) and a Wright PEF meter. METHODS--One hundred and thirteen subjects performed three FVC manoeuvres on the wedge bellows and Escort spirometers and three PEF manoeuvres on the Wright meter. The best reading for each index was recorded. In 21 of the subjects comparison of a Wright manoeuvre with an FVC manoeuvre on the Escort spirometer was performed, whilst in three subjects the effect of repeated blows was studied. RESULTS--The FEV1 ranged from 0.5 to 5.4 litres, FVC from 1.05 to 6.2 litres, and PEF from 100 to 725 l/min. The mean (SD) difference for the FEV1 was -0.05 (0.15) (95% confidence interval (95% CI) -0.07 to -0.02) litres, for FVC 0.03 (0.28) (95% CI -0.02 to +0.08) litres, and for PEF 1.68 (50.6) (95% CI -7.7 to +11.1) l/min. The differences were positively correlated with the mean reading for PEF and FVC but not for FEV1. The Wright PEF manoeuvre performed on the Escort produced significantly higher PEF readings (mean difference -22.9 litres). There was no significant effect of repeated FVC manoeuvres on any of the indices. CONCLUSIONS--The Escort spirometer compares extremely well with a wedge bellows spirometer for measurement of FEV1 and FVC, whilst yielding results of PEF from an FVC manoeuvre which are comparable to those obtained from a Wright meter. It can be recommended for use as a portable hand held spirometer.

Full text

PDF
175

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bland J. M., Altman D. G. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986 Feb 8;1(8476):307–310. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. FitzGerald M. X., Smith A. A., Gaensler E. A. Evaluation of "electronic" spirometers. N Engl J Med. 1973 Dec 13;289(24):1283–1288. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197312132892406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Gardner R. M., Hankinson J. L., West B. J. Evaluating commercially available spirometers. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1980 Jan;121(1):73–82. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1980.121.1.73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Gunawardena K. A., Houston K., Smith A. P. Evaluation of the turbine pocket spirometer. Thorax. 1987 Sep;42(9):689–693. doi: 10.1136/thx.42.9.689. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Jenkins S. C., Barnes N. C., Moxham J. Evaluation of a hand-held spirometer, the Respiradyne, for the measurement of forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC) and peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR). Br J Dis Chest. 1988 Jan;82(1):70–75. doi: 10.1016/0007-0971(88)90010-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kendrick A. H., Laszlo G. Performance of Vitalograph wedge-bellows spirometer--comparison with a rolling seal spirometer. Clin Phys Physiol Meas. 1991 Feb;12(1):65–73. doi: 10.1088/0143-0815/12/1/005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Miller M. R., Dickinson S. A., Hitchings D. J. The accuracy of portable peak flow meters. Thorax. 1992 Nov;47(11):904–909. doi: 10.1136/thx.47.11.904. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Rode A., Shephard R. J. Accuracy of an electronic spirometer--a field trial. Respiration. 1986;50(1):66–69. doi: 10.1159/000194909. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. SHEPHARD R. J. Some observations on peak expiratory flow. Thorax. 1962 Mar;17:39–48. doi: 10.1136/thx.17.1.39. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Wever A. M., Britton M. G., Hughes D. D. Evaluation of two spirometers: a comparative study of the Stead-Wells and the vitalograph spirometers. Chest. 1976 Aug;70(2):244–250. doi: 10.1378/chest.70.2.244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Wever A. M., Britton M. G., Hughes D. T., Van der Plas K. H., Wever-Hess J. Clinical evaluation of five spirometers. Monaghan M403, Pneumoscreen, Spirotron, Vicatest and Vitalograph. Eur J Respir Dis. 1981;62(2):127–137. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Thorax are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES