Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Dig Dis Sci. 2015 Jun 30;60(11):3242–3247. doi: 10.1007/s10620-015-3753-2

Predictors of Early Hospitalization after Deceased Donor Liver Transplant

Jessica Yu 1, Amy Hosmer 2, Tamara Parks 2, Christopher J Sonnenday 3, Pratima Sharma 2
PMCID: PMC4743740  NIHMSID: NIHMS704030  PMID: 26123837

Abstract

Hospitalizations after solid organ transplantation may affect patient outcomes. Identification of the factors attributed to them may decrease hospitalization rates, reduce overall cost and improve post-transplant outcomes. We examined the risk factors for early hospitalization within 30 days and 90-days after liver transplantation (LT).

Methods

Data from index deceased donor LT recipients (age≥18 years) transplanted between 2/28/2002-2/27/2007 and discharged alive from the index hospitalization within 30 days of LT were collected (N=267). Patients were followed until 12/31/2013. Logistic regression was used to identify the predictors of 30-day hospitalization and linear regression was used to identify the factors associated with number of days hospitalized during 30-day and 90-day hospitalization after LT. Renal risk index (RRI), a recently developed and validated risk score that accurately predicts the post-LT ESRD based upon recipient factors at LT, was computed using RRI-calculator (http://rri.med.umich.edu).

Results

One third and more than half of patients had at least one 30-day and 90-day hospitalization, respectively. RRI decile (OR=1.12, p=0.02) and serum sodium at LT (OR=0.90, p<0.001) were independently associated with 30-day hospitalization after adjusting MELD score. Serum creatinine at LT (β=4.34, P=0.001) and pre-LT admission days (β=0.15, P=0.027) affected the number of days hospitalized for 90-day hospitalization. RRI was also an independent predictor of post-LT mortality.

Conclusion

Early hospitalizations within 30-days and 90-days after deceased donor LT are common. While all post-LT hospitalization cannot be prevented, efforts should be directed towards risk-based post-discharge care and coordination of effective transitional care through ambulatory clinics may attenuate early post-LT hospitalization and resource utilization and improve quality.

Introduction

Liver transplantation (LT) is an expensive life-saving procedure for patients with decompensated cirrhosis with an estimated per patient cost greater than half a million dollars. Post-discharge care and hospitalization within first six months of LT contribute significantly to this cost.1 Some of the single center studies have identified Child-Pugh C disease, age greater than 60 years and care at the intensive care unit at the time of LT as some of the factors associated with high resource utilization 2,3. Identification of LT recipients at risk for hospitalization based upon recipient factor(s) or previously validated risk models may decrease post-LT hospitalization, resource utilization and improve post-LT outcomes.

We have recently developed and validated a risk calculator, called renal risk index (RRI), that accurately identifies LT recipients at risk for new onset end stage renal disease (ESRD).4 RRI score, based upon recipient factors at LT, represents the relative risk of developing incident post-LT ESRD compared to the reference patient. RRI stratifies LT recipients from the lowest to highest decile of post-LT ESRD risk. Additionally, RRI also predicts post-LT mortality.4 The components of RRI are age at LT, African American race, cholestatic disease, hepatitis C status, BMI at LT, pre-LT diabetes, serum creatinine, serum albumin, serum bilirubin, serum sodium, Status-1 listing, re-transplantation, history of transjugular intrahepatic porto-systemic shunt, and pre-LT dialysis. RRI may be a surrogate for the severity of overall sickness of a LT candidate going into transplant.

Reduction of hospital readmission has become a new target for quality improvement. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) will be directed to push hospitals to reduce 30-day readmission rates as part of the Affordable Care Act (ACA)5. ACA mandate requires the CMS to reduce payments to the hospitals for acute care readmission within 30-days of discharge or a surgical procedure as opposed to longer time periods. There are data in the non-transplant setting that hospitalization after a surgical procedure or discharge after medical condition such as pneumonia, congestive heart failure, adds significantly to morbidity and mortality.5, 6

Although deceased donor LT is currently not included in the ACA mandate, we systematically studied the early hospitalization after LT at our center in order to examine the relationship between various recipient and donor factors and early hospitalization. Understanding these relationships would be an extremely important step towards unfolding the mechanism behind post-LT hospitalization that may lead to evidence-based development of point of care interventions to improve quality.

Our primary aim was to identify the risk factors associated with 30-day hospitalization after deceased donor LT. Our secondary aims were to identify the recipient and donor factors associated with number of days hospitalized during the 30-day and 90 day post-LT period, respectively.

Methods

Patients and Data

Upon receiving approval from the institutional review board, we reviewed the data of all adult (age≥18 years) deceased donor LT recipients who were transplanted at the University of Michigan between February 28th, 2002 to February 27th, 2007. We excluded repeat transplants, living donor or simultaneous liver and kidney transplant recipients. Patients who were hospitalized for more than 30 days after the index transplant or died during the index LT hospitalization were also excluded.

We collected the following data on patient demographics including race/ethnicity, etiology of liver disease, serum creatinine, bilirubin, INR, albumin and serum sodium and dialysis status. Model for End Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score at LT and body mass index (BMI), date of listing, date of transplant, hospital status at LT and length of stay of index LT. The donor data included donor age, donation after brain death (DBD), and donation after cardiac death (DCD) local, regional or national organ. Donor risk index (DRI) was not used as data on all the components of DRI was not available. RRI score and RRI decile was calculated as described by Sharma et al., using a web-based calculator (https://rri.med.umich.edu7). Patients were followed from day of transplant until date of death or December 31st, 2013.

Statistical Analysis

Descriptive and Primary outcome analysis

The categorical variables were expressed as counts (%) and the continuous variable were expressed as median. The primary outcome was 30-day hospitalization after index LT. LT recipients who were discharged alive within 30 days of index LT hospitalization were included in this analysis (N=267). Age at LT, diagnosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, MELD, RRI decile, serum sodium, creatinine, bilirubin, INR, BMI, dialysis, donor age, DBD, discharge disposition of index LT hospitalization, length of stay of index LT hospitalization and pre-LT admission days were the covariates tested in a univariate logistic regression analysis. Significant covariates (P<0.05) in the univariate model were included in the multivariable logistic regression to analyze the factors associated with 30-day hospitalization. DBD (yes/no) was not significant in the univariate model; therefore, it was not tested in the multivariable model. Results were presented as odds ratio (OR), 95% confidence interval (CI) and p-values were presented for the variables.

Our hypothesis was that 30-day hospitalization after LT is associated with degree of overall health of the recipients prior to transplant. Since MELD and RRI measure of severity of liver disease as well severity of overall sickness, we tested MELD score and RRI decile in addition to other previously identified recipient and donor factors as covariates. Since creatinine and bilirubin were the components of MELD score and RRI, we performed the multi-collinearity diagnostic tests for RRI, MELD and other covariates. MELD score and RRI were not found to be collinear based upon collinearity diagnostics.

Secondary outcomes analyses

The secondary outcomes were number of days hospitalized within the 30-day and 90-day follow-up period and overall patient survival. We examined the factors affecting the number of days hospitalized during the 30-day and 90-day follow-up period using linear regression model as two separate models. Since we were interested in the individual recipient and donor factors, RRI, MELD score and DRI were not included in these models. The covariates with P<0.05 were used in the multivariable model. Covariates significant (P<0.05) in the univariate model were included in the multivariable linear regression. Results were presented as β coefficient and p-value.

Kaplan Meier analysis was used to assess the cumulative probability of survival after LT and multivariable Cox regression analysis to assess the predictors. The time to death was from LT to date of death, censored among survivors at date of last follow up (12/31/2013). The results from the Cox model were presented as hazard ratio (HR) with 95% CI and p-values. All analyses were performed using SPSS version 22.0.

Results

Cohort Characteristics

There were a total of 322 primary deceased donor LT performed during the study period. After applying the exclusion criteria (index hospitalization >30 days=47; death during index LT admission 30 days after transplant=8), the cohort for primary outcome analysis consisted of 267 deceased donor LT recipients. All baseline characteristics including the median RRI and RRI decile were similar in the included and excluded LT recipients with the exception of median MELD score (excluded: 21 vs. included: 17, P=0.01).

The recipient characteristics at LT were shown in Table 1. The median age was 53 years, 69% were male and 45% had hepatitis C as the etiology of liver disease. The median lab MELD score, BMI and RRI at LT were 18, 28 kg/m2, and 1.4, respectively. The median donor age was 39 years.

Table 1.

Patient Characteristics at LT and outcomes

Variables Median or n (%)

Age at LT 53

Males 183 (69%)
Females 84 (31%)

White 229 (86%)
Black 17 (6%)
Hispanics 8 (3.0%)
Others 13 (5%)

Hepatitis C 121 (45%)
Hepatitis B 12 (4%)
Alcohol 41(15%)
Cryptogenic 39 (15%)
Others 55 (13%)

HCC 64 (24%)

Lab MELD 18

% Dialysis at LT 4 (1.5%)

BMI 28

Serum Sodium 137

Renal Risk Index 1.4
RRI Decile 5

Donor age 39
DBD 192 (72%)
DCD 8 (3%)
Unknown 67 (25%)

Admitted before LT 47 (15%)
Pre-LT LOS 10 days (6.5-17.6)

TxLOS 10 days

Discharge Home 242 (91%)
Discharge ECF 25 (9%)

The median serum sodium at LT was 137 mMol/L (Interquartile range: Q1:133; Q3:140). Only 10 (3.1%) of the patients at LT had serum sodium <125 mMol/L and only 1 (0.3%) patient had serum sodium >145 mMol/L.

Proportion of 30-day and 90-day hospitalization

No hospitalization occurred in 176 (66%) recipients. Eighty three (31%) of the LT recipients had one hospitalization, eight (3%) had two or more post-LT hospitalization within 30 days of deceased donor LT. The causes of hospitalization were biliary complications (22%), other surgical complications (including hepatic artery thrombosis, hemorrhage, wound infection/dehiscence and venous outflow issues) (15%), and infections excluding biliary source (21%), other medical causes (24%), rejection (1%), tacrolimus toxicity (5%) and miscellaneous causes (12%).

One hundred and twenty four LT recipients (46.4%) did not have any admission within 90-days of LT. Seventy three had at least 1 hospitalization (27.3%) and seventy (26.3%) had two or more hospitalization within 90 days of LT.

Factors associated with the odds of 30-day post-LT hospitalization

Lab MELD score (OR=1.06, P=0.003), RRI decile (OR=1.11, P=0.027) and serum sodium at LT (OR=0.91, P<0.001) were associated with 30-day hospitalization on univariate analysis (Table 2).

Table 2.

Recipient and donor factors associated with 30-day hospitalization: Univariate and multivariate analysis of 30-day post-LT hospitalization

Univariate analysis Multivariable analysis
variables at LT Odds ratio (95% CI) P-value Odds ratio (95% CI) P-value
Age 1.007 (0,98-1.04) 0.7
HCC (vs. not) 0.57 (0.03-1.07) 0.08
Lab MELD score* 1.06 (1.02-1.10 0.003 1.03 (0.98-1.07) 0.15
Serum Sodium* 0.91 (0.86-0.96) <0.001 0.90 (0.85-0.96) <0.001
Serum Creatinine 1.34 (0.99-1.89) 0.06
Serum Bilirubin 1.02 (0.98-1.07) 0.4
INR 1.37 (0.89-2.12) 0.2
Dialysis (vs. not) 0.64 (0.06-6.25) 0.7
BMI 0.96(0.92-1.01) 0.10
RRI decile* 1.11 (1.01-1.21) 0.027 1.12 (1.02-1.23) 0.02
Pre-LT admit days 1.04 (0.99-1.09) 0.89
LOS index LT 0.98 (0.93-1.02) 0.3
Discharge SNF vs. home 1.22 (0.59-2.5) 0.6
Donor age 1.01 (0.99-1.02) 0.2
DBD (vs. not) 1.10 (0.84-1.45) 0.5

In the multivariable logistic regression model, RRI decile (OR = 1.12, p = 0.02) and serum sodium at LT (OR=0.90, P<0.001) were the independent predictors of 30-day hospitalization after adjusting for lab MELD score (Table 2). Every unit increase in RRI decile was associated with 12% increased odds of 30-day hospitalization. Every unit decrease in serum sodium at LT was associated with 10% increased odds of 30-day hospitalization.

Factors affecting number of days hospitalized: 30-days follow up after LT

On univariate analysis, serum creatinine at LT (β=1.44, P=0.02), serum sodium at LT (β=−0.22, P=0.02) and pre-LT admission days (β=0.21, P=0.04) were significantly associated with number of days hospitalized for 30-day hospitalization. On multivariate analysis, none of these variables were significant. There was a trend between serum creatinine and number of days hospitalized during 30 day follow up after LT but it was not statistically significant (β=1.23, P=0.056).

Since we were interested in the effect of individual donor and recipient components on number of days hospitalized during 30-day follow-up period, MELD score and RRI components were included in this model.

Factors affecting number of days hospitalized: 90 days follow-up after LT

In the univariate analysis, pre-LT admission days (β=0.40, P=0.04), donor age (β=0.14, P=0.03), serum creatinine at LT (β=3.96, P=0.001), serum bilirubin at LT (β=0.35, P=0.04) and serum sodium at LT (β=−0.41, P=0.02) significantly affected the number of days hospitalized for 90-day hospitalization.

In the multivariable model, serum creatinine (β=4.34, P=0.001) and donor age (β=0.15, P=0.027) were independently associated with number of days hospitalized during 90-day follow up after adjusting for pre-LT admission days, serum bilirubin and serum sodium at LT.

Predictors of patient survival

There were a total of 91 deaths during the follow up period. The cumulative probability of 1-, 3- and 5-year survival was 89%, 78% and 73% respectively. RRI decile (HR [95% CI]=1.15[1.06-1.26], P=0.001) and diagnosis of hepatitis C (HR [95% CI]=1.06[1.03-2.51], P=0.038) were the independent predictors of mortality after adjusting for MELD score, BMI, donor age and pre-LT admission days.

Discussion

Our study showed that one third of LT recipients had 30-day hospitalization after LT and this proportion increased to more than half for 90-day hospitalization. RRI decile and serum sodium at LT were associated with 30-day hospitalization. High creatinine at LT and advance donor age significantly contributed to the total number of days hospitalized within 90 days of LT. RRI decile and hepatitis C predicted overall patient survival.

Our study established an association between RRI decile and 30-day hospitalization. RRI was derived from a cohort of 43,514 LT recipients. It consists of 14 recipient risk factors and represents the relative risk of developing incident post-LT ESRD compared to the reference patient. Risk of post-LT ESRD increased with the increase in RRI decile.4 Furthermore, increase in RRI decile was also associated with increased post-transplant mortality4. Our study showed twelve percent increased risk of 30-day hospitalization with every unit increase in RRI decile. This effect was independent of MELD score and serum creatinine at LT. RRI was also an independent predictor of post-LT survival. We think that RRI is a unique domain that reflects the overall severity of sickness of a candidate at LT that is not captured by MELD at LT. Therefore, those with high RRI decile were more likely to have increased risk of hospitalization after LT independent of their MELD score and renal function at LT.

It has been previously shown that low serum sodium levels were associated with increased index LT length of stay and early post-LT outcomes8, 9. We also found an independent association between serum sodium and 30-day hospitalization. Every unit decrease in serum sodium at LT was associated with 10% increased odds of 30-day hospitalization. Given that the patients with MELD score ≥12 and low serum sodium receive survival benefit from LT10, more patients with hyponatremia may get LT. These results may have implications in the future in terms of resource utilization among hyponatremic patients because of the implementation of MELD-Na for liver allocation.11

In addition to other factors, Pereira et al. found an association of increased 30-day hospitalization with pre-LT hospitalization within 90 days, pre-LT serum creatinine and index LT length of stay2. In our study we observed a trend towards increase in total number of days hospitalized during the first 30 days with every unit increase in creatinine. This trend became statistically significant for the number of days hospitalized for 90-day hospitalization. Our study also showed an independent association of donor age with increase in number of days hospitalized during the first 90 days. Donor age also predict graft failure and is one of the components of DRI.12

Our study did not find an association between MELD score at LT with 30-day hospitalization as previously demonstrated by Buchanan et al.13 MELD is an excellent predictor of waitlist mortality but its validity in predicting the resource utilization and post-LT survival is often questioned.

The main limitation of our study is the retrospective observational design from a single center that may not be generalizable to other centers. Moreover, the observational study design may result in bias due to patient selection and unmeasured patient characteristics. Furthermore, given the small sample size, our study is not powered to develop and validate risk prediction models. The majority of the complications following LT leading to readmission were biliary, infectious, or technical in nature. However, our study did not examine the correlation between RRI and surgical complications. Despite these limitations, this hypothesis generating study highlights the burden of early post-LT hospitalization and identified important risk factors associated with post-LT hospitalization.

In conclusion, 30-day and 90-day post-LT hospitalization are common among LT recipients and should not be included in the ACA mandate of reducing payments for acute care readmission. RRI predicted the 30-day hospitalization and post-LT mortality. It is difficult to modify recipient and donor risk factors given the narrow window of opportunity for transplantation. Finally, future research should be directed towards risk-based post-discharge care and coordination of effective transitional care through ambulatory clinics. A transitional care model that involves following patients closely in a multidisciplinary transplant clinic with protocol driven care administered by extended provider under the direct supervision of transplant physician or surgeon should be tested in the future. may attenuate early post-LT hospitalization and resource utilization and improve quality. Implementation of such processes may attenuate early post-LT hospitalization and resource utilization and improve quality.

Acknowledgement

This research was presented, in part, as a free communication at the national meeting of American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, 2014 held at Boston, MA. Dr. Sharma is supported by National Institutes of Health (NIH) grant DK-088946 and research award from American College of Gastroenterology

Abbreviations

BMI

Body Mass Index

LT

Liver Transplantation

MELD

Model for End Stage Liver Disease

RRI

Renal Risk Index

References

  • 1.Bentley ST, Hanson SG, Hauboldt RA. U.S. organ and tissue transplant cost estimates and discussion. Milliman Research Report: Milliman Inc. 2011;2011:1–14. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Pereira AA, Bhattacharya R, Carithers R, et al. Clinical factors predicting readmission after orthotopic liver transplantation. Liver Transpl. 2012;18:1037–45. doi: 10.1002/lt.23475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Shankar N, Marotta P, Wall W, et al. Defining readmission risk factors for liver transplantation recipients. Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y) 2011;7:585–90. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Sharma P, Goodrich NP, Schaubel DE, et al. Patient-Specific Prediction of ESRD after Liver Transplantation. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013 doi: 10.1681/ASN.2013040436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Axon RN, Williams MV. Hospital readmission as an accountability measure. JAMA. 2011;305:504–5. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Jencks SF, Williams MV, Coleman EA. Rehospitalizations among patients in the Medicare fee-for-service program. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:1418–28. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa0803563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Sharma P, Perlmutter A. Renal Risk Index Calculator. 2013 [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Leise MD, Yun BC, Larson JJ, et al. Effect of the pretransplant serum sodium concentration on outcomes following liver transplantation. Liver Transpl. 2014;20:687–97. doi: 10.1002/lt.23860. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Londono MC, Guevara M, Rimola A, et al. Hyponatremia impairs early posttransplantation outcome in patients with cirrhosis undergoing liver transplantation. Gastroenterology. 2006;130:1135–43. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2006.02.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Sharma P, Schaubel DE, Goodrich NP, et al. Serum sodium and the survival benefit of liver transplantation. Liver Transpl. 2014 doi: 10.1002/lt.24063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Committee LaIOT Proposal to Add Serum Sodium to the MELD Score. 2013;2013 [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Feng S, Goodrich NP, Bragg-Gresham JL, et al. Characteristics associated with liver graft failure: the concept of a donor risk index. Am J Transplant. 2006;6:783–90. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2006.01242.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Buchanan P, Dzebisashvili N, Lentine KL, et al. Liver transplantation cost in the model for end-stage liver disease era: looking beyond the transplant admission. Liver Transpl. 2009;15:1270–7. doi: 10.1002/lt.21802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES