Abstract
Conventional diuretics such as furosemide and thiazides target salt transporters in kidney tubules, but urea transporters (UTs) have emerged as alternative targets. UTs are a family of transmembrane channels expressed in a variety of mammalian tissues, in particular the kidney. UT knockout mice and humans with UT mutations exhibit reduced maximal urinary osmolality, demonstrating that UTs are necessary for the concentration of urine. Small-molecule screening has identified potent and selective inhibitors of UT-A, the UT protein expressed in renal tubule epithelial cells, and UT-B, the UT protein expressed in vasa recta endothelial cells. Data from UT knockout mice and from rodents administered UT inhibitors support the diuretic action of UT inhibition. The kidney-specific expression of UT-A1, together with high selectivity of the small-molecule inhibitors, means that off-target effects of such small-molecule drugs should be minimal. This Review summarizes the structure, expression and function of UTs, and looks at the evidence supporting the validity of UTs as targets for the development of salt-sparing diuretics with a unique mechanism of action. UT-targeted inhibitors may be useful alone or in combination with conventional diuretics for therapy of various oedemas and hyponatraemias, potentially including those refractory to treatment with current diuretics.
Introduction
Urea is the end-product of nitrogen metabolism in mammals; it is generated mainly in the liver, excreted by the kidney, and highly concentrated in urine compared with levels in blood. A central role for urea and urea transport in the urinary concentrating mechanism was first proposed by Gamble and colleagues in 1934,1 based on the observation that increased urine concentration in rats resulted from urea loading. Urea transporter (UT) proteins, which facilitate the passive transport of urea driven by a concentration gradient across some cell plasma membranes, are now known to be essential in the urinary concentrating mechanism.
It has long been appreciated that urea permeability (Purea) varies widely between different cell membranes;2,3 the high Purea of human erythrocyte membranes (4–10 × 10−4 cm/s)4 compared with artificial lipid bilayers (~4 × 10−6 cm/s)5,6 suggested the existence of facilitated urea transport. Similarly, studies of rabbit kidneys have shown high transepithelial Purea (~2 × 10−5 cm/s) in isolated perfused cortical collecting ducts,7 and very high Purea (~4 × 10−4 cm/s) in the inner medullary collecting duct (IMCD).8
Early molecular studies suggested the existence of UT proteins because urea transport in Xenopus oocytes increased after the cells were injected with mRNA from toad urinary bladder, a tissue that has high Purea.9 The first UT protein was identified in rabbit kidneys in 1993 by using expression cloning;10 subsequent work has identified and characterized homologous UTs from other mammals and lower organisms, greatly advancing our understanding of UT biology, particularly in the kidney. This Review discusses these discoveries and looks at emerging evidence from experiments with UT knockout mice and small-molecule UT inhibitors, which show that UT inhibitors have clinical potential as salt-sparing diuretics, or ‘urearetics’, that have a unique mechanism of action. This mechanism is the disruption of the countercurrent multiplication mechanism for urinary concentration that leads to a diuretic response.
UT proteins
Molecular genetics
Mammalian UT proteins are encoded by two genes that are arranged in tandem: SLC14A1 and SLC14A2. In humans, these genes are located ~50 kb apart on chromosome 18.11,12 The SLC14A1 gene consists of 11 exons and encodes two variants of UT-B, UT-B1 and UT-B2, which are splice variants of the SLC14A1 gene13,14 that show 100% homology except for an additional 55 amino acids in the N-terminus of UT-B2.15 In this Review, we use the term UT-B to refer to both splice variants, and only distinguish between the splice variants when their expression or functions differ.
The SLC14A2 gene consists of 26 exons and encodes six UT-A isoforms, which are under the control of two distinct promoters: UT-Aα and UT-Aβ.16,17 UT-A1, UT-A3, UT-A4, UT-A5 and UT-A6 are transcribed from the UT-Aα promoter, which is located upstream of exon 1, whereas UT-A2 is transcribed from the internal UT-Aβ promoter.18 The entire length of the SLC14A2 gene encodes UT-A1, which consists of 930 amino acids; the other five isoforms share different regions of this coding sequence (Figure 1).19–21 UT-A1, UT-A2 and UT-A3 have all been identified in mice, rats and humans, whereas UT-A4 has only been identified in rats, UT-A5 only in mice and UT-A6 only in humans.19,22,23 UT-B has >60% homology with UT-A2.24
Molecular structure
The first X-ray crystal structure of a UT that was solved was that of the bacterial protein dvUT, a functional homologue of mammalian UTs from Desulphovibrio vulgaris.25 Structures were determined for dvUT both alone and co-crystallized with the urea analogue dimethylurea (Protein Data Bank IDs 3K3G and 3K3F, respectively). The same group subsequently solved X-ray crystal structures of the mammalian UT-B from Bos taurus, both alone and co-crystallized with selenourea (Protein Data Bank IDs 4EZC and 4EZD, respectively; Figure 2).26 These studies showed that the quaternary structures of dvUT and bovine UT-B are similar, with both forming homotrimers (Figure 2a); size-exclusion chromatography suggested that human UT-B also exists as a homotrimer. Whether or not the UT-A isoforms also exist as homotrimers is still unknown. A dimeric structure of UT-A1 was proposed on the basis of chemical crosslinking, but the identity of the species as a homodimer or hetero-oligomer was not established.27 Although UT-A1 and UT-A3 are coexpressed in the IMCD, immunoprecipitation suggests that they do not oligomerize.28
Bovine UT-B and dvUT each contain two homologous halves that fold to form the complete channel (Figure 2b), and it has been postulated that the homologous halves descend from a common ancestral gene that duplicated at a time near to the divergence of eukaryotes from prokaryotes.29 Each UT-B half contains five transmembrane helices (T1a–T5a and T1b–T5b) and a tilted helix (Pa and Pb) that is approximately half the length of the membrane-spanning helices. The N-termini and C-termini of dvUT and UT-B are cytoplasmic, as confirmed by topogenic signal analysis30 and immunoadsorption experiments with human UT-B.31
The UT-A isoforms UT-A2, UT-A3 and UT-A4 are each predicted to have a similar molecular structure to UT-B: 10 transmembrane domains with two internal hydrophobic repeats, linked by an extracellular connecting loop and with intracellular N-termini and C-termini. The largest UT-A isoform, UT-A1, consists of this structure duplicated.13,32
UT-B contains an amphipathic pore region formed by the association of the two homologous halves (Figure 2c). The UT-B selectivity filter is thought to involve three regions that line the central pore: the S0, Si and Sm sites.26 The S0 and Si sites, which are on the extracellular and cytoplasmic sides respectively, form a ladder of main-chain and side-chain oxygen atoms that are able to form hydrogen bonds and that interact with the polar urea molecule. The Sm site serves as a central constriction of the channel.
When co-crystallized with bovine UT-B, the urea analogue selenourea interacts with the selectivity filter by hydrogen bonding with Asn227 at the S0 site, and with Asn63 at the Si site (Figure 2c). The Sm site is relatively narrow and lined by the hydrophobic side chains of Thr172 and Thr334, which, in addition to serving as a steric constriction, might desolvate urea as it passes through the pore. A Thr172Val mutation increases steric hindrance at the constriction site and results in reduced Purea, whereas Thr172Ser, Thr334Ser, and Thr172Ser–Thr334Ser mutations reduce steric hindrance and slightly increase Purea.26 Interestingly, despite the narrow and desolvating Sm constriction site, UT-B can conduct water, whereas the UT-A isoforms cannot.33–35
Other small-molecule analogues of urea are also able to traverse the UT-B channel, including formamide, acetamide, methylurea, methylformamide, ammonium carbonate and acrylamide.36 Molecular dynamics simulations that used the technique of umbrella sampling concluded that urea traverses the channel with minimal rotation, allowing it to continuously maintain hydrogen bonding interactions with the ladder of hydrogen-bond-accepting groups, and preventing substantial alteration of the UT-B structure.26
Tissue expression
Most UTs are expressed in the kidney (Figure 3), where their role in the urinary concentrating mechanism has been well studied. UT-A1 is expressed on the apical membranes and UT-A3 on the basolateral membranes of cells in the IMCD, which is the most urea-permeable segment of the nephron.22,37,38 One study reported that UT-A3 is also localized to the apical membranes of cells in the IMCD after vasopressin administration.39 UT-A2 is expressed in the thin descending limbs of the short loop nephrons in the outer medulla and in the distal part of long loop nephrons in the inner medulla.40 UT-A4 has been reported in renal medulla only in rats, and its precise cellular localization is not known.22 UT-B, including both splice variants, is expressed in endothelial cells of the descending vasa recta.41,42
Some UTs are also expressed outside of the kidney (Box 1); knowledge of extrarenal UT expression sites and function is important in drug discovery to identify potential off-target, extrarenal effects of UT inhibition.
Box 1 . Extrarenal expression of mammalian UT proteins.
UT-B1: bladder, brain, colon, ear, erythrocyte, heart, liver, lung, pancreas, prostate, skeletal muscle, small intestine, testis, thymus, spleen
UT-B2: brain (human), rumen (bovine), thymus (mouse)
UT-A1: cochlea
UT-A2: heart, liver
UT-A3: cochlea, inner medullary collecting duct
UT-A4: renal medulla (rat)
UT-A5: testis (mouse)
UT-A6: colon (human)
Abbreviation: UT, urea transporter.
Extrarenal expression of UT-B splice variants differs between tissues; UT-B1 is expressed more widely than UT-B2, which has only been detected in the brain of humans.15,41 Immunocytochemistry has demonstrated the localization of UT-B1 to villous epithelium in the small intestinal, gastric glandular epithelium43 and colonic crypt epithelium44,45 in the digestive tract, ependymal cells and astrocytes in the brain, aortic endothelia cells,12,41,46 and Sertoli cells in the testes.47 UT-A isoforms have limited extrarenal expression, but UT-A1,48 UT-A2,49 UT-A348 and UT-A621 have been detected in extrarenal tissues in humans, whereas the UT-A5 transcript is expressed in peritubular myoid cells in the seminiferous tubules in mouse testes.19,50
Potential roles of extrarenal UTs have been proposed. UT-A2 in liver and heart may facilitate efflux of metabolically generated urea,49,51,52 and UTs in the inner ear have been postulated to facilitate urea transport between the endolymph and perilymph, contributing to fluid homeostasis.48 Phenotype studies on UT-B knockout mice have revealed neuropsychiatric,53 cardiac conduction,54,55 bladder56 and testicular57 abnormalities, although the relevance of these phenotype findings is unclear, both because they lack plausible mechanisms, suggesting secondary effects, and because there are no studies of humans with loss-of-function mutations in UT-B that report extrarenal abnormalities.
Regulation
Vasopressin regulation of Purea in the collecting duct was described before the identification of UTs;58–60 vasopressin is now known to be a major regulator of UT-A1 and UT-A3 in the IMCD. Vasopressin binding to V2 receptors causes elevation of cAMP, activation of protein kinase A, and phosphorylation of UT-A1 and UT-A3.28,61–63 Serine phosphorylation of UT-A1 and UT-A3 is involved in their accumulation in the plasma membrane and is associated with an increase in IMCD Purea.64–66 Independently of vasopressin, hypertonicity also increases IMCD Purea by UT-A1 and UT-A3 phosphorylation and membrane targeting,39,67 via mechanisms involving a calcium-dependent protein kinase C.68
Recent data also suggest the involvement of caveolin, snapin and actin in apical membrane UT targeting.69 UT-A1 degradation, which involves the lysosome–proteasome system, might regulate UT-A1 expression at a post-transcriptional level.70
Non-mammalian UTs
UTs are found not only in mammals, but also in non-mammalian organisms including bacteria, plants and fish. A brief discussion of non-mammalian UTs is informative in understanding the wide-ranging functions of UTs, some of which are relevant in mammals.
Bacterial UTs can be divided into three distinct functional classes: pH-independent, proton-gated and ATP-activated. The bacterial UT protein Yut, found in Yersinia, is pH-independent and homologous to mammalian UTs, showing 22% sequence identity to human UT-A1;71,72 for comparison, dvUT shows 35% sequence identity to human UT-B.25 UreI from Helicobacter pylori, a bacterium that survives in the highly acidic gastric environment, is a H+-gated UT. H. pylori uses UreI to transport urea into the cytoplasm, where it is then hydrolysed to form NH3 and CO2;71,73 the NH3 and CO2 are transported to the periplasm, where NH3 neutralizes acid, and CO2 (upon conversion to bicarbonate) buffers periplasmic pH to ~6.1.73 Some bacterial UTs belong to the ATP-binding cassette (ABC) class of transporters, meaning that urea transport by these transporters is accompanied by ATP hydrolysis. The ABC class of UTs is used by the soil bacterium Corynebacterium glutamicum and various species of cyanobacteria, in which imported urea is hydrolysed by urease and used as a catabolic nitrogen source.71
One class of plant aquaporins called tonoplast intrinsic proteins, which were identified in Arabidopsis, show pH-independent and phloretin-sensitive urea transport.74 Arabidopsis also expresses a high-affinity H+–urea symporter called AtDUR3, which belongs to a family of Na+–solute symporters.75 Although only limited information is available, increased expression of AtDUR3 has been observed in Arabidopsis seedlings, suggesting that urea transport might be involved in early plant development.75
Of non-mammalian vertebrates that express UTs, fish have received the most attention.76,77 An interesting difference between fish and mammals is that fish lack an erythrocyte UT.76 In teleosts, UTs, together with ammonia transporters, seem to be involved in nitrogen excretion through the gills,76 whereas in elasmobranches, UTs in the kidney and gill help to retain urea against the concentration gradient set up by the surrounding water.76,78 As would be expected, fish UTs have greater homology than do bacterial UTs to mammalian UTs; for example, the UT of Danio rerio (zebrafish) has 63% sequence identity to human UT-A2. In 2005, a new UT (named UT-C) was identified in the proximal tubule of kidneys in seawater eel, which is the first example of a UT expressed in proximal tubule.79
UTs in kidney function
UTs and the urinary concentrating mechanism
Concentration of urine by the kidney involves a counter-current multiplication mechanism, in which the anatomical configuration of the tubules and vasa recta permits countercurrent flow and intrarenal urea recycling, resulting in a hypertonic inner medulla. Urea has a central role in this mechanism.80,81 The IMCD, which expresses UT-A1 and UT-A3, is responsible for urea reabsorption during antidiuresis; this reabsorption is needed to maintain a hypertonic medullary interstitium. The fenestrated ascending vasa recta, which is highly permeable to urea, facilitates transfer of urea from the inner to the outer medulla, where its concentration is lower. Interstitial urea coming from the ascending vasa recta is partially reabsorbed by the non-fenestrated descending vasa recta, which expresses UT-B, and the thin descending limb of Henle, which expresses UT-A2, by a countercurrent exchange mechanism in which urea recycling conserves renal urea.80–82
Although these basic processes are probably correct (at least qualitatively), many questions remain about the role of urea in countercurrent multiplication and exchange mechanisms, as mathematical models are unable to predict the actual magnitude of urinary concentration in mammals. Current understanding of the role of urea and UTs in the urinary concentrating mechanism is discussed in a recent review.83
Lessons from UT knockout mice
The first UT knockout mouse was generated in 2002 by targeted UT-B gene disruption.84 UT-B knockout mice show a modest, ~50% increase in fluid intake and urinary output compared with wild-type mice, and manifest a mild reduction in maximum urinary osmolality (1,500 mOsm/kg H2O versus 2,000 mOsm/kg H2O in wild-type mice). The knockout mice show a more than twofold reduction in the urine-to-plasma ratio of urea compared with that of wild-type mice, indicating a reduced capacity of the kidney to concentrate urea above its blood level. This defect suggests that urea recycling in the descending vasa recta is impaired; the greater quantities of urea returned to the general circulation result in reduced inner medullary hypertonicity and urinary concentration.84,85
Mice that lack both UT-A1 and UT-A3 show a marked defect in urinary concentrating function.86 With a normal diet, UT-A1/3 knockout mice have more than a twofold increase in fluid intake and an approximately threefold increase in urine volume, accompanied by a marked reduction in maximal urinary osmolality compared with wild-type mice (800 mOsm/kg H2O versus 2,300 mOsm/kg H2O in wild-type mice). As predicted, the concentration of urea in the inner medulla is reduced by more than threefold, which supports the proposed requirement for UTs in the IMCD for urea accumulation in the inner medullary interstitium.
Interestingly, UT-A1/3 deletion did not affect urine concentration in mice that were on a low-protein diet, indicating that the impaired urinary concentrating function in UT-A1/3 knockout mice depends on the excretion of large amounts of urea.86 UT-A1 also seems to be more important than UT-A3 in urinary concentration, as the impaired urinary concentration in UT-A1/3 knockout mice was corrected by transgenic replacement of UT-A1 even without replacement of UT-A3.87
Unexpectedly, UT-A2 knockout mice do not manifest defective urinary concentration under normal conditions.88 However, these mice do show a mild decrease in maximal urine osmolality when on a low-protein diet (2,500 mOsm/kg H2O versus 3,500 mOsm/kg H2O in wild-type mice), with a >1.5-fold reduction in urea concentration in the inner medulla compared with wild-type mice.88 Intriguingly, double-knockout mice that lack UT-B and UT-A2 show lesser impairment in urinary concentration ability than do mice that lack only UT-B.85 One speculative explanation put forward for this unexpected observation is that deletion of UT-A2 reduces the loss of urea from the descending limb to the general circulation; however, the precise function of UT-A2 in the urinary concentrating mechanism remains unclear.
We note that interpretation of phenotype data from knockout mice is subject to the caveat that knockout mice generally manifest chronic altered expression of many proteins, as has been reported for UT knockout mice,89,90 so that findings can be the result of primary or secondary effects. Selective, rapidly acting UT inhibitors are useful in distinguishing between primary versus secondary effects.
Lessons from humans with UT mutations
The UT-B gene locus SLC14A1 determines an individual’s Kidd blood group, and contains two alleles: Jka and Jkb. Rare individuals that lack both of these alleles, termed Jknull, show no clinical abnormality except for reduced maximal urinary concentration. Healthy adults concentrate their urine to ~1,200 mOsm/kg H2O, whereas individuals with the Jknull genotype concentrate urine to ~800 mOsm/kg H2O.91,92 Jknull individuals manifest loss of UT-B function, demonstrated by the finding that their erythrocytes are resistant to lysis at high urea concentration.92 Humans with loss-of-function mutations in UT-A isoforms have not been identified.
Since 2011, gene association studies have identified single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of the SLC14A1 gene that show it to be a susceptibility locus for bladder carcinogenesis.93–95 An association between urinary bladder cancer and urine concentration or frequency of urination was proposed. Various human SNPs of UT-A2 have been linked to reduced diastolic blood pressure in Chinese men.96 Other UT-A2 SNPs have been associated with development of metabolic syndrome in Asians,97 although the responsible mechanisms and relevance of these observations are not clear.
UT inhibitors
Until recently, available UT inhibitors included the non-selective membrane-intercalating agent phloretin and chemical analogues of urea, such as dimethylthiourea (DMTU), that are effective at millimolar concentrations.4 The identification of selective, small-molecule UT inhibitors, some of which have an IC50 (concentration that causes 50% inhibition) in the low nanomolar range, has arisen from the development of new assays of UT function that are suitable for high-throughput screening of diverse collections of drug-like molecules.
Assaying UT function
As the exclusive function of UT proteins is to facilitate the transport of urea (and some urea analogues), assaying UT function involves the measurement of urea transport from one side of a cell membrane, or an epithelium, to the other side (Figure 4). In one version of the assay, urea is added on one side of an epithelial cell layer, such as an epithelial cell culture grown on a porous filter, and its accumulation on the opposite side of the layer is measured by either an enzymatic, urease-based colorimetric assay, or by using radiolabelled 14C–urea (Figure 4a). This type of epithelial cell assay has been used to test UT inhibitors in UT-A1-transfected MDCK cells.98 Measurement of transepithelial urea transport has been performed in isolated microperfused kidney tubules8 and other ex vivo epithelia such as toad bladder.99
Urea transport across individual cell membranes can be measured in large cells by assaying urea in extracellular fluid samples, which has been done in Xenopus oocytes.9 In smaller cells, urea transport is usually measured indirectly through the secondary effects of urea movement on water transport and hence on cell (or membrane vesicle or liposome) volume. This technique is used because urea equilibration occurs over seconds or tens of seconds, which makes the physical separation of cells from extracellular solution difficult.
Stopped-flow light scattering has been widely used to measure Purea in erythrocytes.4,100 In this method, erythrocytes in suspension are subjected to an inwardly directed urea gradient, which results in initial osmotic water efflux and cell shrinkage, detected as an increase in scattered light intensity, followed by urea and water influx and cell reswelling, detected as a phase of decreasing scattered light intensity (Figure 4b). Inhibition of the erythrocyte UT-B slows the reswelling phase. Other methods that follow cell volume kinetics have also been applied to measurement of urea transport, such as methods that use the volume-sensing fluorescent dye calcein.101 Although the methods described above provide accurate data on Purea, they are not easily adapted to automated high-throughput screening platforms.
The first high-throughput screening assay for the identification of UT inhibitors used erythrocytes, which natively express UT-B.98 The assay uses a read-out of erythrocyte lysis measured by near-infrared light absorbance at single time points (Figure 4c). Erythrocytes are preloaded with acetamide, a urea analogue that is transported by UT-B at a rate such that its equilibration time is similar to the equilibration time for osmotic water transport. This preloading imposes a large, outwardly directed gradient of acetamide that causes cell swelling, but this swelling is limited by UT-B-facilitated acetamide efflux. UT-B inhibition slows acetamide efflux, which leads to increased cell lysis. Once acetamide concentration was optimized for identification of UT-B inhibitors, the assay was found to be robust and sensitive, giving a statistical Z-factor of ~0.6, and to correlate well with UT-B inhibition data from stopped-flow light scattering measurements. As discussed below, the erythrocyte lysis assay has been used in several screening studies to identify UT-B inhibitors.
Development of a similar UT-A urea transport assay was challenging, because available cell lines do not natively express UT-A isoforms, UT-A-facilitated urea equilibration across cell membranes is rapid, and robust measurement of cell volume using an automated screening platform is difficult. One assay for UT-A1 inhibitors involves the measurement of cell volume changes that result from extracellular addition of urea to transfected MDCK cells that stably express UT-A1 (Figure 4d).102 Cell volume is measured indirectly using the fluorescence of the chloride-sensing, genetically encoded fluorescent protein YFP–H148Q–V163S;103 cell shrinkage increases cytoplasmic chloride concentration, which subsequently reduces YFP fluorescence. The MDCK cells are also transfected with the water channel aquaporin-1 to make osmotic water equilibration faster than urea equilibration. Addition of urea to the extracellular solution drives osmotic water efflux and cell shrinkage, which is followed by urea (and water) entry and a return to the original cell volume. The assay produces a robust difference between the fluorescence curve shapes with and without UT-A1 inhibition, and correlates well with transepithelial urea transport measurements. This assay has been used in screening studies to identify UT-A1 inhibitors.
Discovery of small-molecule UT inhibitors
An initial screening of 50,000 drug-like small molecules that used the high-throughput erythrocyte lysis assay with human erythrocytes (Figure 4c) identified ~30 UT-B inhibitors from the phenylsulphoxyoxozole, benzenesulphonanilide, phthalazinamine, and aminobenzimidazole chemical classes.98 Analysis of ~700 chemical analogues of these four scaffolds identified many active compounds, the most potent of which inhibited human UT-B urea transport with an IC50 of ~10 nM and caused ~100% inhibition at concentrations over 1 μM. The compounds were characterized and used to confirm water transport through UT-B.
A subsequent screening of 100,000 compounds that used mouse erythrocytes aimed to identify potent inhibitors of rodent (and human) UT-B, because the inhibitors that were identified in the original screening of human UT-B urea transport had relatively weak activity against mouse and rat UT-B.104 The most potent UT-B inhibitor identified in this screening was the triazolothienopyrimidine 3-(4-ethyl-benzenesulphonyl)-thieno[2,3-e][1,2,3] triazolo[1,5-a]pyrimidin-5-yl]-thiophen-2-ylmethylamine (UTBinh-14; Figure 5). UTBinh-14, which was synthesized and purified in five steps, fully and reversibly inhibited urea transport with an IC50 of 10 nM for human UT-B (Figure 5b) and 25 nM for mouse UT-B.104 UTBinh-14 is highly selective, with no inhibition of UT-A1 even at high concentration. Competition studies showed reduced potency of inhibition with increased urea concentration, which suggests that UTBinh-14 binds to the UT-B protein near the urea binding site of UTBinh-14, in a cleft near the cytoplasmic pore region of the UT-B molecule (Figure 5c). As described below, UTBinh-14 has been used in mice to test the effect of acute UT-B inhibition on urinary concentrating function.
Medicinal chemistry has been used to optimize triazolothienopyrimidine properties and increase the metabolic stability of UTBinh-14.105 Analysis of structure–activity relationships indicated that CH2 hydroxylation of the ethyl substituent in UTBinh-14 is a major determinant of the molecule’s metabolic stability. Replacement of the CH2 hydrogen atoms with fluorine atoms to produce the compound {3-[4-(1,1-difluoroethyl)-benzenesulphonyl]-thieno[2,3-e][1,2,3]triazolo[1,5-a] pyrimidin-5-yl}-thiophen-2-ylmethylamine resulted in a ~40-fold improvement of in vitro metabolic stability over UTBinh-14 with little effect on UT-B inhibition potency. The optimized UT-B inhibitor accumulated in the kidneys and urine in mice, and reduced maximum urinary concentration.
High-throughput screening has also identified small molecules that inhibit UT-A proteins (Figure 6). Screening of 100,000 synthetic small molecules for UT-A1 inhibition using the assay described in MDCK cells (Figure 4d) identified four classes of compounds, each with a low-micromolar IC50; the most potent of these compounds was UTAinh-A1 (Figure 6a).102 The UT-A1 isoform was used for the screening because it is predicted to be the most important isoform for urinary concentration. UT-A1 inhibition by each of the UT-A1 inhibitors was reversible and largely non-competitive. An interesting finding was the identification of compounds that have a wide range of selectivities for UT-A1 and UT-B; even within the same chemical class, relatively minor chemical modifications produced compounds with very high selectivity and others with little UT-A1 versus UT-B selectivity.
Subsequent screening was performed to identify UT-A1-selective inhibitors that have suitable pharmacological properties for efficacy testing in rodents.106 This screening identified one compound—the arylthiazole UTAinh-E02 (Figure 6a)—that reversibly inhibited UT-A1 urea transport with an IC50 of 1–2 μM via a non-competitive mechanism, and that has ~100-fold greater selectivity for UT-A1 than for UT-B (Figure 6b). Liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry was used to predict therapeutic inhibitor concentrations in rats following intravenous bolus administration.
Interestingly, screening of approved and investigational drugs and natural products also identified nicotine, sanguinarine and an indolcarbonylchromenone as UT-A1 inhibitors, albeit with relatively weak IC50 values of 10–20 μM.107
Diuretic action of UT inhibitors in rodents
The UT-B-selective inhibitor UTBinh-14 was studied in mice after pharmacological studies had been used to establish the optimal compound administration vehicle, dose, route and timing to maintain concentrations in the kidneys and urine that are predicted to be therapeutic.104 Mice were administered intraperitoneal UTBinh-14 or a vehicle control, followed by the vasopressin receptor agonist dDAVP. Urine osmolality was mildly reduced in UTBinh-14-treated mice compared with vehicle-treated mice; this reduced osmolality was similar to the urine osmolality observed in UT-B knock-out mice, in which UTBinh-14 had no significant effect (Figure 7a). UTBinh-14 also mildly increased urine output and reduced urine osmolality in mice that were given free access to water. The fact that the diuretic effect of selective UT-B inhibition was relatively minor was not unexpected, as tubule epithelial UT-A is predicted to be the major target for diuretic effect. A subsequent study of a non-selective UT inhibitor in rats also reported diuretic action.108 Acute inhibition of UT-B by selective inhibitors should be useful in studying the potential extrarenal effects of UT-B inhibition, as mentioned above.
The effect of the UT-A1-selective inhibitor UTAinh-E02 on urinary concentration has been studied by intraperitoneal injection of UTAinh-E02 into rats that were also administered dDAVP.106 In vehicle-treated animals, dDAVP reduced urine volume and increased urine osmolality, but UTAinh-E02 prevented these changes. At 3–6 h after UTAinh-E02 administration, little residual difference remained between UTAinh-E02-treated and vehicle-treated rats, indicating inhibitor reversibility (Figure 7b). In hydrated rats, increased urine volume and reduced urine osmolality were seen at 0–3 h after UTAinh-E02 administration; urine volume and osmolality returned to baseline in the 3–6 h collection. These studies support the hypothesis that selective UT-A inhibition has a diuretic effect; this effect is advantageous for drug development because UT-A isoforms are primarily expressed in kidney, whereas UT-B is relatively ubiquitous, so off-target effects are likely to be less problematic with UT-A inhibition than with UT-B inhibition.
A 2012 study examined the diuretic action of the non-selective UT inhibitor DMTU, which is a urea analogue that has been used at high doses in experimental animal models as a hydroxyl radical scavenger, where it inhibited urinary concentration.109 DMTU fully and reversibly inhibited rat UT-A1 and UT-B by a non-competitive mechanism with an IC50 of 2–3 mM.107 Following a single intraperitoneal injection of 500 mg/kg DMTU, peak plasma concentration of DMTU was 9 mM with a half-life of ~10 h, and urine concentration of DMTU was 20–40 mM. Chronic treatment with high-dose DMTU resulted in a sustained reduction in urine osmolality from 1,800 mOsm/kg H2O to 600 mOsm/kg H2O and a threefold increase in urine output, both of which fully reversed after DMTU discontinuation. DMTU did not further impair the already reduced urinary concentrating function in rats on a low-protein diet. Rats that were given chronic DMTU treatment showed mild hypokalaemia, but no abnormalities in serum chemistry. Hypokalaemia is usually seen after diuretic administration, and its likely cause in the DMTU-treated rats is, at least in part, an increased distal delivery of urinary fluid. Short-term DMTU administration indicated a salt-sparing diuretic action. The DMTU data further support the diuretic efficacy of UT inhibition.
Indications for UT inhibitors
UT inhibitors, particularly inhibitors of UT-A1, have several potential clinical indications. UT-blocking diuretics may be useful, either alone or in combination with conventional diuretics that block salt transport, in oedema caused by fluid overload (congestive heart failure, nephrotic syndrome and cirrhosis) and in hyponatraemia caused by chronic elevation in vasopressin level (syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion [SIADH]). Their unique mechanism of action on renal countercurrent mechanisms means that UT-A1 inhibitors might be effective in refractory oedema, for which conventional diuretics such as furosemide and thiazides have limited effectiveness, and could produce a relatively salt-sparing diuresis. After optimization of their pharmacological properties, testing of UT-A1 inhibitors in clinically relevant animal models of oedema and hyponatraemia will be important to define their clinical indications.
Conclusions
Our understanding of urea transport mechanisms and the role of urea transport in the urinary concentrating mechanism has been greatly advanced by the identification of UTs and studies in transgenic mice and rodents treated with UT inhibitors. However, unresolved issues remain concerning UT physiology and the translation of UT biology into therapeutics. The precise roles and regulation of the different mammalian UT isoforms in the urinary concentrating mechanism remain incompletely understood, as does the validity of translating findings in animal models to humans. Nevertheless, the available results provide a compelling rationale for advancing UT inhibitors, particularly inhibitors of UT-A1, as salt-sparing diuretics with a mechanism of action that differs from that of existing salt-blocking diuretics. Target properties of UT inhibitors for clinical applications include high UT-A1 inhibition potency and selectivity, good pharmacological properties such as oral bioavailability, and few off-target effects. Ultimately, clinical trials will be needed to assess the efficacy and safety of UT inhibitors alone and together with conventional diuretics, the occurrence of hypokalaemia with UT use, and the clinical indication profile of UTs.
Key points.
Urea transporter (UT) proteins facilitate the passive transport of urea driven by a concentration gradient across the cell plasma membrane in some kidney and extrarenal cells
The kidney expresses UT-A1 and UT-A3 in inner medullary collecting duct epithelium, UT-A2 in thin descending limbs of the loop of Henle, and UT-B in descending vasa recta endothelium
Kidney UTs are required for the generation of concentrated urine
High-throughput screening has identified potent and selective small-molecule inhibitors of UT-A and UT-B that produce a salt-sparing diuresis in rodent models
UT inhibitors may be useful alone or in combination with conventional diuretics for therapy of various oedemas and hyponatraemias
Review criteria.
We searched PubMed (all years) using the search terms “urea transport”, “renal concentrating mechanism” and “urea transporter knockout”. All articles identified were full-text papers. We also read abstracts from the American Society of Nephrology and Experimental Biology meetings (2011–2014) to identify further relevant studies.
Acknowledgments
M.O.A. and A.S.V. are funded by the National Institutes of Health, and A.S.V. is also funded by the Guthy–Jackson Charitable Foundation and the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation.
Footnotes
Competing interests
C.E.-F., M.O.A. and A.S.V. declare that they are named inventors on patent applications for urea transporter screening methods and small-molecule urea transporter inhibitors. Patent rights are assigned to the authors’ respective institutions, and patents have not yet been licensed.
Author contributions
C.E.-F., M.O.A. and A.S.V. researched data for the article, provided substantial contributions to discussions of content, and wrote the article, and reviewed and/or edited the manuscript before submission.
References
- 1.Gamble JL, McKhann CF, Butler AM, Tuthill E. An economy of water in renal function referable to urea. Am J Physiol. 1934;109:139–154. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Aukland K. Renal tubular permeability to urea with special reference to accumulation of urea in the renal medulla. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 1961;13:646–660. doi: 10.3109/00365516109137339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Magnan De Bornier B. Effect of urea on the permeability of the erythrocyte membrane [French] Montp Med. 1958;53:181–184. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Mayrand RR, Levitt DG. Urea and ethylene glycol-facilitated transport systems in the human red cell membrane. Saturation, competition, and asymmetry. J Gen Physiol. 1983;81:221–237. doi: 10.1085/jgp.81.2.221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Gallucci E, Micelli S, Lippe C. Non-electrolyte permeability across thin lipid membranes. Arch Int Physiol Biochim. 1971;79:881–887. doi: 10.3109/13813457109104847. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Macey RI. Transport of water and urea in red blood cells. Am J Physiol. 1984;246:C195–C203. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.1984.246.3.C195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Schafer JA, Troutman SL, Andreoli TE. Osmosis in cortical collecting tubules. ADH-independent osmotic flow rectification. J Gen Physiol. 1974;64:228–240. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Sands JM, Knepper MA. Urea permeability of mammalian inner medullary collecting duct system and papillary surface epithelium. J Clin Invest. 1987;79:138–147. doi: 10.1172/JCI112774. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Zhang RB, Verkman AS. Water and urea permeability properties of Xenopus oocytes: expression of mRNA from toad urinary bladder. Am J Physiol. 1991;260:C26–C34. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.1991.260.1.C26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.You G, et al. Cloning and characterization of the vasopressin-regulated urea transporter. Nature. 1993;365:844–847. doi: 10.1038/365844a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Fenton RA, Hewitt JE, Howorth A, Cottingham CA, Smith CP. The murine urea transporter genes Slc14a1 and Slc14a2 occur in tandem on chromosome 18. Cytogenet Cell Genet. 1999;87:95–96. doi: 10.1159/000015401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Olives B, et al. Cloning and functional expression of a urea transporter from human bone marrow cells. J Biol Chem. 1994;269:31649–31652. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Shayakul C, Clémençon B, Hediger MA. The urea transporter family (SLC14): physiological, pathological and structural aspects. Mol Aspects Med. 2013;34:313–322. doi: 10.1016/j.mam.2012.12.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Tickle P, Thistlethwaite A, Smith CP, Stewart GS. Novel bUT-B2 urea transporter isoform is constitutively activated. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2009;297:R323–R329. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00199.2009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Stewart GS, et al. UT-B is expressed in bovine rumen: potential role in ruminal urea transport. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2005;289:R605–R612. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00127.2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Nakayama Y, Peng T, Sands JM, Bagnasco SM. The TonE/TonEBP pathway mediates tonicity-responsive regulation of UT-A urea transporter expression. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:38275–38280. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M004678200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Nakayama Y, et al. Cloning of the rat Slc14a2 gene and genomic organization of the UT-A urea transporter. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2001;1518:19–26. doi: 10.1016/s0167-4781(00)00311-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Fenton RA, et al. Structure and characterization of the mouse UT-A gene (Slc14a2) Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2002;282:F630–F638. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00264.2001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Fenton RA, et al. Molecular characterization of a novel UT-A urea transporter isoform (UT-A5) in testis. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2000;279:C1425–C1431. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.2000.279.5.C1425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Smith CP. Mammalian urea transporters. Exp Physiol. 2009;94:180–185. doi: 10.1113/expphysiol.2008.043042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Smith CP, Potter EA, Fenton RA, Stewart GS. Characterization of a human colonic cDNA encoding a structurally novel urea transporter, hUT-A6. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2004;287:C1087–C1093. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00363.2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Karakashian A, et al. Cloning and characterization of two new isoforms of the rat kidney urea transporter: UT-A3 and UT-A4. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1999;10:230–237. doi: 10.1681/ASN.V102230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Smith CP, Fenton RA. Genomic organization of the mammalian SLC14a2 urea transporter genes. J Membr Biol. 2006;212:109–117. doi: 10.1007/s00232-006-0870-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Bankir LT, Trinh-Trang-Tan MM. Renal urea transporters. Direct and indirect regulation by vasopressin. Exp Physiol. 2000;85:243S–252S. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-445x.2000.tb00029.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Levin EJ, Quick M, Zhou M. Crystal structure of a bacterial homologue of the kidney urea transporter. Nature. 2009;462:757–761. doi: 10.1038/nature08558. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Levin EJ, et al. Structure and permeation mechanism of a mammalian urea transporter. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109:11194–11199. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1207362109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Bradford AD, et al. 97- and 117-kDa forms of collecting duct urea transporter UT-A1 are due to different states of glycosylation. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2001;281:F133–F143. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.2001.281.1.F133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Blount MA, Klein JD, Martin CF, Tchapyjnikov D, Sands JM. Forskolin stimulates phosphorylation and membrane accumulation of UT-A3. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2007;293:F1308–F1313. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00197.2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Minocha R, Studley K, Saier MH., Jr The urea transporter (UT) family: bioinformatic analyses leading to structural, functional, and evolutionary predictions. Receptors Channels. 2003;9:345–352. doi: 10.3109/714041015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.von Heijne G, Gavel Y. Topogenic signals in integral membrane proteins. Eur J Biochem. 1988;174:671–678. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1988.tb14150.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Lucien N, et al. Antigenic and functional properties of the human red blood cell urea transporter hUT-B1. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:34101–34108. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M205073200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Shayakul C, Hediger MA. The SLC14 gene family of urea transporters. Pflugers Arch. 2004;447:603–609. doi: 10.1007/s00424-003-1124-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Azouzi S, et al. Energetic and molecular water permeation mechanisms of the human red blood cell urea transporter B. PLoS One. 2013;8:e82338. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0082338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Yang B, Verkman AS. Urea transporter UT3 functions as an efficient water channel. Direct evidence for a common water/urea pathway. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:9369–9372. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.16.9369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Yang B, Verkman AS. Analysis of double knockout mice lacking aquaporin-1 and urea transporter UT-B. Evidence for UT-B-facilitated water transport in erythrocytes. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:36782–36786. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M206948200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Zhao D, Sonawane ND, Levin MH, Yang B. Comparative transport efficiencies of urea analogues through urea transporter UT-B. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2007;1768:1815–1821. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2007.04.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Stewart GS, et al. The basolateral expression of mUT-A3 in the mouse kidney. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2004;286:F979–F987. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00334.2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Terris JM, Knepper MA, Wade JB. UT-A3: localization and characterization of an additional urea transporter isoform in the IMCD. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2001;280:F325–F332. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.2001.280.2.F325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Blessing NW, Blount MA, Sands JM, Martin CF, Klein JD. Urea transporters UT-A1 and UT-A3 accumulate in the plasma membrane in response to increased hypertonicity. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2008;295:F1336–F1341. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.90228.2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Wade JB, et al. UT-A2: a 55-kDa urea transporter in thin descending limb whose abundance is regulated by vasopressin. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2000;278:F52–F62. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.2000.278.1.F52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Timmer RT, et al. Localization of the urea transporter UT-B protein in human and rat erythrocytes and tissues. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2001;281:C1318–C1325. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.2001.281.4.C1318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Xu Y, et al. Endothelial cells of the kidney vasa recta express the urea transporter HUT11. Kidney Int. 1997;51:138–146. doi: 10.1038/ki.1997.17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Doran JJ, et al. Tissue distribution of UT-A and UT-B mRNA and protein in rat. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2006;290:R1446–R1459. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00352.2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Collins D, et al. Differential protein abundance and function of UT-B urea transporters in human colon. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2010;298:G345–G351. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00405.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Inoue H, et al. Identification and characterization of a Kidd antigen/UT-B urea transporter expressed in human colon. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2004;287:C30–C35. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00443.2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Wagner L, Klein JD, Sands JM, Baylis C. Urea transporters are distributed in endothelial cells and mediate inhibition of L-arginine transport. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2002;283:F578–F582. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00355.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Tsukaguchi H, et al. Cloning and characterization of the urea transporter UT3: localization in rat kidney and testis. J Clin Invest. 1997;99:1506–1515. doi: 10.1172/JCI119313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Kwun YS, et al. Immunohistochemical localization of urea transporters A and B in the rat cochlea. Hear Res. 2003;183:84–96. doi: 10.1016/s0378-5955(03)00218-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Duchesne R, et al. UT-A urea transporter protein in heart: increased abundance during uremia, hypertension, and heart failure. Circ Res. 2001;89:139–145. doi: 10.1161/hh1401.093293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Fenton RA, Cooper GJ, Morris ID, Smith CP. Coordinated expression of UT-A and UT-B urea transporters in rat testis. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2002;282:C1492–C1501. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00567.2001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Klein JD, Timmer RT, Rouillard P, Bailey JL, Sands JM. UT-A urea transporter protein expressed in liver: upregulation by uremia. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1999;10:2076–2083. doi: 10.1681/ASN.V10102076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Sands JM. Mammalian urea transporters. Annu Rev Physiol. 2003;65:543–566. doi: 10.1146/annurev.physiol.65.092101.142638. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Li X, et al. Mice lacking urea transporter UT-B display depression-like behavior. J Mol Neurosci. 2012;46:362–372. doi: 10.1007/s12031-011-9594-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Meng Y, et al. Surface electrocardiogram and action potential in mice lacking urea transporter UT-B. Sci China C Life Sci. 2009;52:474–478. doi: 10.1007/s11427-009-0047-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Yu H, et al. Differential protein expression in heart in UT-B null mice with cardiac conduction defects. Proteomics. 2009;9:504–511. doi: 10.1002/pmic.200701079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Dong Z, et al. Urea transporter UT-B deletion induces DNA damage and apoptosis in mouse bladder urothelium. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e76952. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0076952. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Guo L, et al. Reduced urea flux across the blood-testis barrier and early maturation in the male reproductive system in UT-B-null mice. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2007;293:C305–C312. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00608.2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Reif MC, Troutman SL, Schafer JA. Sustained response to vasopressin in isolated rat cortical collecting tubule. Kidney Int. 1984;26:725–732. doi: 10.1038/ki.1984.208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Rocha AS, Kudo LH. Water, urea, sodium, chloride, and potassium transport in the in vitro isolated perfused papillary collecting duct. Kidney Int. 1982;22:485–491. doi: 10.1038/ki.1982.201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Wall SM, Han JS, Chou CL, Knepper MA. Kinetics of urea and water permeability activation by vasopressin in rat terminal IMCD. Am J Physiol. 1992;262:F989–F998. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.1992.262.6.F989. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Chen G, Fröhlich O, Yang Y, Klein JD, Sands JM. Loss of N-linked glycosylation reduces urea transporter UT-A1 response to vasopressin. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:27436–27442. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M605525200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Klein JD, et al. Vasopressin increases plasma membrane accumulation of urea transporter UT-A1 in rat inner medullary collecting ducts. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006;17:2680–2686. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2006030246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Zhang C, Sands JM, Klein JD. Vasopressin rapidly increases phosphorylation of UT-A1 urea transporter in rat IMCDs through PKA. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2002;282:F85–F90. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.0054.2001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Blount MA, et al. Phosphorylation of UT-A1 urea transporter at serines 486 and 499 is important for vasopressin-regulated activity and membrane accumulation. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2008;295:F295–F299. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00102.2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Fenton RA. Essential role of vasopressin-regulated urea transport processes in the mammalian kidney. Pflugers Arch. 2009;458:169–177. doi: 10.1007/s00424-008-0612-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Hwang S, et al. Vasopressin increases phosphorylation of Ser84 and Ser486 in Slc14a2 collecting duct urea transporters. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2010;299:F559–F567. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00617.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Wang Y, Klein JD, Liedtke CM, Sands JM. Protein kinase C regulates urea permeability in the rat inner medullary collecting duct. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2010;299:F1401–F1406. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00322.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Wang Y, Klein JD, Froehlich O, Sands JM. Role of protein kinase C-α in hypertonicity-stimulated urea permeability in mouse inner medullary collecting ducts. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2013;304:F233–F238. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00484.2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Chen G. New advances in urea transporter UT-A1 membrane trafficking. Int J Mol Sci. 2013;14:10674–10682. doi: 10.3390/ijms140510674. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Su H, Chen M, Sands JM, Chen G. Activation of the cAMP/PKA pathway induces UT-A1 urea transporter monoubiquitination and targets it for lysosomal degradation. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2013;305:F1775–F1782. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00393.2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Sachs G, Kraut JA, Wen Y, Feng J, Scott DR. Urea transport in bacteria: acid acclimation by gastric Helicobacter spp. J Membr Biol. 2006;212:71–82. doi: 10.1007/s00232-006-0867-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Sebbane F, et al. The Yersinia pseudotuberculosis Yut protein, a new type of urea transporter homologous to eukaryotic channels and functionally interchangeable in vitro with the Helicobacter pylori UreI protein. Mol Microbiol. 2002;45:1165–1174. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2002.03096.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Gray LR, Gu SX, Quick M, Khademi S. Transport kinetics and selectivity of HpUreI, the urea channel from Helicobacter pylori. Biochemistry. 2011;50:8656–8663. doi: 10.1021/bi200887a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Liu LH, Ludewig U, Gassert B, Frommer WB, von Wirén N. Urea transport by nitrogen-regulated tonoplast intrinsic proteins in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2003;133:1220–1228. doi: 10.1104/pp.103.027409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Liu LH, Ludewig U, Frommer WB, von Wirén N. AtDUR3 encodes a new type of high-affinity urea/H+ symporter in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2003;15:790–800. doi: 10.1105/tpc.007120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.McDonald MD, Smith CP, Walsh PJ. The physiology and evolution of urea transport in fishes. J Membr Biol. 2006;212:93–107. doi: 10.1007/s00232-006-0869-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Weihrauch D, Wilkie MP, Walsh PJ. Ammonia and urea transporters in gills of fish and aquatic crustaceans. J Exp Biol. 2009;212:1716–1730. doi: 10.1242/jeb.024851. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Hediger MA, et al. Structure, regulation and physiological roles of urea transporters. Kidney Int. 1996;49:1615–1623. doi: 10.1038/ki.1996.235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Mistry AC, et al. A novel type of urea transporter, UT-C, is highly expressed in proximal tubule of seawater eel kidney. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2005;288:F455–F465. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00296.2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Pannabecker TL. Comparative physiology and architecture associated with the mammalian urine concentrating mechanism: role of inner medullary water and urea transport pathways in the rodent medulla. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2013;304:R488–R503. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00456.2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Sands JM. Critical role of urea in the urine-concentrating mechanism. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2007;18:670–671. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2006121314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Sands JM, Layton HE. The physiology of urinary concentration: an update. Semin Nephrol. 2009;29:178–195. doi: 10.1016/j.semnephrol.2009.03.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Sands JM, Layton HE. Advances in understanding the urine-concentrating mechanism. Annu Rev Physiol. 2014;76:387–409. doi: 10.1146/annurev-physiol-021113-170350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Yang B, Bankir L, Gillespie A, Epstein CJ, Verkman AS. Urea-selective concentrating defect in transgenic mice lacking urea transporter UT-B. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:10633–10637. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M200207200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Lei T, et al. Role of thin descending limb urea transport in renal urea handling and the urine concentrating mechanism. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2011;301:F1251–F1259. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00404.2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Fenton RA, Chou CL, Stewart GS, Smith CP, Knepper MA. Urinary concentrating defect in mice with selective deletion of phloretin-sensitive urea transporters in the renal collecting duct. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101:7469–7474. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0401704101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Klein JD, et al. Transgenic mice expressing UT-A1, but lacking UT-A3, have intact urine concentrating ability. FASEB J. 2013;27:1111.17. Meeting Abstract Suppl. [Google Scholar]
- 88.Uchida S, et al. Impaired urea accumulation in the inner medulla of mice lacking the urea transporter UT-A2. Mol Cell Biol. 2005;25:7357–7363. doi: 10.1128/MCB.25.16.7357-7363.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Klein JD, Sands JM, Qian L, Wang X, Yang B. Upregulation of urea transporter UT-A2 and water channels AQP2 and AQP3 in mice lacking urea transporter UT-B. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2004;15:1161–1167. doi: 10.1097/01.asn.0000125617.19799.72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Fenton RA, et al. Renal phenotype of UT-A urea transporter knockout mice. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2005;16:1583–1592. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2005010031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Lucien N, et al. Characterization of the gene encoding the human Kidd blood group/urea transporter protein. Evidence for splice site mutations in Jknull individuals. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:12973–12980. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.21.12973. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Sands JM, Gargus JJ, Fröhlich O, Gunn RB, Kokko JP. Urinary concentrating ability in patients with Jk(a-b-) blood type who lack carrier-mediated urea transport. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1992;2:1689–1696. doi: 10.1681/ASN.V2121689. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Garcia-Closas M, et al. A genome-wide association study of bladder cancer identifies a new susceptibility locus within SLC14A1, a urea transporter gene on chromosome 18q12.3. Hum Mol Genet. 2011;20:4282–4289. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddr342. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Koutros S, et al. Genetic susceptibility loci, pesticide exposure and prostate cancer risk. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e58195. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0058195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Rafnar T, et al. European genome-wide association study identifies SLC14A1 as a new urinary bladder cancer susceptibility gene. Hum Mol Genet. 2011;20:4268–4281. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddr303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Ranade K, et al. Genetic variation in the human urea transporter-2 is associated with variation in blood pressure. Hum Mol Genet. 2001;10:2157–2164. doi: 10.1093/hmg/10.19.2157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Tsai HJ, et al. Genetic variants of human urea transporter-2 are associated with metabolic syndrome in Asian population. Clin Chim Acta. 2010;411:2009–2013. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2010.08.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Levin MH, de la Fuente R, Verkman AS. Urearetics: a small molecule screen yields nanomolar potency inhibitors of urea transporter UT-B. FASEB J. 2007;21:551–563. doi: 10.1096/fj.06-6979com. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Shpun S, Katz U. Urea transport across urinary bladder and salt acclimation in toad (Bufo viridis) Am J Physiol. 1990;258:R883–R888. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.1990.258.4.R883. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Levitt DG, Mlekoday HJ. Reflection coefficient and permeability of urea and ethylene glycol in the human red cell membrane. J Gen Physiol. 1983;81:239–253. doi: 10.1085/jgp.81.2.239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Verkman AS, Anderson MO, Papadopoulos MC. Aquaporins: important but elusive drug targets. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2014;13:259–277. doi: 10.1038/nrd4226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Esteva-Font C, Phuan PW, Anderson MO, Verkman AS. A small molecule screen identifies selective inhibitors of urea transporter UT-A. Chem Biol. 2013;20:1235–1244. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2013.08.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Baumgart F, Rossi A, Verkman AS. Light inactivation of water transport and protein–protein interactions of aquaporin–Killer Red chimeras. J Gen Physiol. 2012;139:83–91. doi: 10.1085/jgp.201110712. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Yao C, et al. Triazolothienopyrimidine inhibitors of urea transporter UT-B reduce urine concentration. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2012;23:1210–1220. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2011070751. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Anderson MO, et al. Nanomolar potency and metabolically stable inhibitors of kidney urea transporter UT-B. J Med Chem. 2012;55:5942–5950. doi: 10.1021/jm300491y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Esteva-Font C, et al. Diuresis and reduced urinary osmolality in rats produced by small-molecule UT-A-selective urea transport inhibitors. FASEB J. 2014;28:3878–3890. doi: 10.1096/fj.14-253872. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Esteva-Font C, et al. Nanomolar-potency, UT-A-selective inhibitors of kidney tubule urea transporters produce salt-sparing diuresis in rats. American Society of Nephrology abstract. in press. [Google Scholar]
- 108.Li F, et al. A novel small-molecule thienoquinolin urea transporter inhibitor acts as a potential diuretic. Kidney Int. 2013;83:1076–1086. doi: 10.1038/ki.2013.62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Cil O, Ertunc M, Onur R. The diuretic effect of urea analog dimethylthiourea in female Wistar rats. Hum Exp Toxicol. 2012;31:1050–1055. doi: 10.1177/0960327112459205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]