Abstract
Extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) production and the prevalence of the β-lactamase-encoding gene blaTEM were determined in Prevotella isolates (n = 50) cultured from the respiratory tract of adults and young people with cystic fibrosis (CF). Time–kill studies were used to investigate the concept of passive antibiotic resistance and to ascertain whether a β-lactamase-positive Prevotella isolate can protect a recognised CF pathogen from the action of ceftazidime in vitro. The results indicated that approximately three-quarters (38/50; 76%) of Prevotella isolates produced ESBLs. Isolates positive for ESBL production had higher minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of β-lactam antibiotics compared with isolates negative for production of ESBLs (P < 0.001). The blaTEM gene was detected more frequently in CF Prevotella isolates from paediatric patients compared with isolates from adults (P = 0.002), with sequence analysis demonstrating that 21/22 (95%) partial blaTEM genes detected were identical to blaTEM-116. Furthermore, a β-lactamase-positive Prevotella isolate protected Pseudomonas aeruginosa from the antimicrobial effects of ceftazidime (P = 0.03). Prevotella isolated from the CF respiratory microbiota produce ESBLs and may influence the pathogenesis of chronic lung infection via indirect methods, including shielding recognised pathogens from the action of ceftazidime.
Keywords: Anaerobes, Cystic fibrosis, β-Lactams, Antibiotic resistance
1. Introduction
Prevotella spp. are dominant obligate anaerobic bacteria belonging to the oral and respiratory microbiota. They have been shown to occur in healthy individuals and in people with chronic pulmonary infection including cystic fibrosis (CF), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and bronchiectasis [1–8]. This opportunistic pathogen has the potential to produce virulence factors that inhibit the action of antibiotics, facilitate immune evasion and contribute to tissue degradation [9,10]. Nevertheless, the pathogenesis of Prevotella infection in chronic polymicrobial lung diseases is not understood.
Pulmonary infection in CF is managed using a range of antimicrobial agents, including β-lactam antibiotics, which target pathogens such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa [11]. Although Prevotella spp. are not currently targeted by antibiotic treatment of chronic lung infections, we recently detected resistance to penicillin and cephalosporin antibiotics in CF isolates from this genus, with reduced susceptibility associated with β-lactamase production [9]. Extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs), classed in functional subgroup 2be, including those encoded by a TEM-type β-lactamase gene (blaTEM), are known to confer resistance to such β-lactam antibiotics [12]. ESBL-producing bacteria have also been associated with clinical failure of cephalosporin antibiotics and increased mortality in hospital-acquired infections [13,14]. These data suggest that it may be clinically important to determine whether Prevotella spp. specifically produce ESBLs, which is currently unknown. Furthermore, in polymicrobial infections, β-lactamase-producing bacteria may protect β-lactam-susceptible members of the community from antimicrobial agents [15]. Therefore, β-lactamase production by Prevotella spp. may be an indirect method by which this genus contributes to disease pathogenesis in CF by enabling recognised pathogens to persist in the presence of β-lactam antibiotics.
The objective of this study was to investigate the production of ESBLs by clinical Prevotella isolates (n = 50) from the respiratory microbiota of adults and young people with CF and to establish the prevalence of blaTEM among these isolates. We also investigated the concept of passive resistance and hypothesised that a β-lactamase-producing Prevotella isolate could protect a P. aeruginosa isolate (from CF sputum) from the action of ceftazidime, an antibiotic commonly used in the treatment of CF pulmonary exacerbations.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Clinical Prevotella isolates
Fifty Prevotella isolates from people with CF living in Northern Ireland were included in this study to investigate ESBL production. The CF isolates were cultured from 14 adult (≥18 years) CF patients attending the adult CF clinic, Belfast, UK (sputum, n = 25) and 11 paediatric (6–17 years) CF patients attending the paediatric CF clinic, Belfast, UK (sputum, n = 4; cough swab, n = 21). The isolates originated from single bacterial colonies with different morphotypes from each clinical sample and those identified as Prevotella spp. were subsequently used in this study. Isolates were identified via 16S rRNA sequencing (Fig. A1, Appendix). Current prescription of long-term antibiotics (flucloxacillin, azithromycin, tobramycin and colistin) was documented for each CF patient (Table A1, Appendix).
2.2. Extended-spectrum β-lactamase production by Prevotella
Prevotella isolates (n = 50) were tested for production of ESBLs under strict anaerobic conditions using the combined disk method according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, each isolate was inoculated onto supplemented Brucella blood agar (SBBA) with disks (Neo-Sensitabs™; Rosco Diagnostica, Taastrup, Denmark) containing the indicator cephalosporins (ceftazidime 30 μg and cefotaxime 30 μg) as well as ceftazidime + clavulanic acid (30 μg + 10 μg) and cefotaxime + clavulanic acid (30 μg + 10 μg). Isolates were classed as ESBL-positive or ESBL-negative according to Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI) guidelines [16] as follows: isolates were identified as ESBL-positive if the diameter of the inhibition zone was increased by ≥5 mm when the tested indicator cephalosporin was combined with clavulanic acid for at least one of the combinations; and isolates were identified as ESBL-negative if the difference between the zone diameters was <5 mm for both combinations. Klebsiella pneumoniae ATCC 700603 was used as a quality control strain.
2.3. Susceptibility of Prevotella isolates to β-lactam antibiotics
Amoxicillin, ceftazidime and amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (AMC) were selected for in vitro susceptibility testing as these β-lactams are among the antibiotics recommended for the treatment of CF respiratory infection according to clinical guidelines [17]. Under strict anaerobic conditions, Prevotella isolates (n = 50) were inoculated onto SBBA and the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) determined by Etest (bioMérieux, Marcy-l’Étoile, France) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Streptococcus pneumoniae ATCC 49619 (amoxicillin), P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853 (ceftazidime) and Bacteroides fragilis ATCC 25285 (AMC) were used as quality control strains. Where anaerobic breakpoints are available, isolates were categorised as susceptible, intermediate-resistant or resistant as defined by CLSI guidelines [18].
2.4. PCR amplification of blaTEM and DNA sequencing
DNA extraction was performed as previously described [19]. An alignment of 109 different blaTEM-type nucleotide sequences (861 bp, downloaded from BLAST) was used to identify consensus regions for primer annealing. Primers (blaTEM-Forward, 5′-CCG AAG AAC GTT TTC CAA TG-3′; and blaTEM-Reverse, 5′-GAA GCT AGA GTA AGT AGT TCG-3′) had 100% coverage with the reference sequences and were purchased from Eurofins MWG Operon (Wolverhampton, UK). The PCR screening assay was performed using MyTaq™ Red Mix (Bioline, London, UK). The final reaction mixture (50 μL) contained 0.2 μM of each forward and reverse primer and 2 μL of DNA template. Escherichia coli NCTC 11560 (blaTEM-1) was used as a positive control. PCR was performed using an Applied Biosystems® Veriti® Thermal Cycler (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Paisley, UK) with the following parameters: initial denaturation at 94 °C for 5 min; 33 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 1 min, annealing at 55 °C for 1 min and extension at 72 °C for 1.5 min; and a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. Amplicons (424 bp) were analysed as previously described [19]. PCR products positive for blaTEM were purified using a QIAquick® PCR Purification Kit (QIAGEN, Manchester, UK) in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. Both strands of DNA were sequenced by Eurofins MWG Operon using the forward and reverse primers, and a consensus DNA sequence was determined with CLUSTALW software. The deduced nucleotide sequences were compared with sequences deposited in GenBank.
2.5. Passive resistance
A β-lactamase-positive Prevotella isolate (ceftazidime MIC > 256 mg/L) and a β-lactamase-negative P. aeruginosa isolate (ceftazidime MIC = 0.5 mg/L) (cultured from CF sputum and identified using 16S rRNA sequencing) were selected to investigate the concept of passive resistance [15].
Time–kill studies were carried out under strict anaerobic conditions according to CLSI guidelines [20]. Assays (Prevotella monoculture, P. aeruginosa monoculture and co-culture) were performed using basal anaerobic medium containing 1% w/v potassium nitrate (details of this medium are provided in the Appendix) and a cephalosporin antibiotic (ceftazidime; AAH Pharmaceuticals, Belfast, UK) at a predetermined concentration of 64× (32 mg/L) the P. aeruginosa MIC; this concentration has also been detected in CF sputum [21]. The initial inoculum of each bacterium was prepared to ca. 5 × 105 CFU/mL. No drug assays were included as controls. Killing activity was assessed at 0, 2, 4, 6, 24 and 48 h and was repeated on three different occasions with colonies enumerated on SBBA (under anaerobic conditions) and on Mueller–Hinton agar (under aerobic conditions) for the Prevotella and P. aeruginosa isolates, respectively. Drug carry-over was minimised by carrying out serial dilutions (10−1 to 10−6) in sterile saline.
A protective effect (antagonism) by Prevotella was defined as a ≥2 log10 increase in viable count of P. aeruginosa at 48 h compared with that of the P. aeruginosa isolate alone [22]. The limit of detection was 2 × 102 CFU/mL. To investigate whether survival of P. aeruginosa in the presence of Prevotella was secondary to the development of ceftazidime resistance, susceptibility testing (Etest) was performed using individual colonies (n = 10) isolated from the co-culture.
2.6. Statistical analysis
As the combined disk method is not routinely used to analyse ESBL production in Prevotella spp., a Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient was used to measure the degree of association between zone diameter in the ESBL detection assay and susceptibility (MICs) to β-lactams. MICs were compared in ESBL-positive versus ESBL-negative isolates using the Mann–Whitney test. The prevalence of ESBL-producing isolates cultured from CF patients currently prescribed long-term antibiotics (flucloxacillin, azithromycin, tobramycin and colistin) compared with CF patients not prescribed these antibiotics was also determined using a χ2 test with Yates continuity correction or Fisher’s exact test. To investigate whether there was an association between the number of long-term antibiotics prescribed (0, 1, 2 or ≥3) and detection of ESBL-producing Prevotella isolates, Fisher’s exact test was used. A χ2 test with Yates continuity correction was also utilised to determine whether there was evidence of an association between ESBL production or detection of blaTEM and Prevotella group (CF adult versus CF paediatric patients). The total viable count (log10 CFU/mL) of P. aeruginosa in the presence of ceftazidime ± Prevotella was compared using a paired samples t-test. All statistical analyses were carried out with IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows v.21.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). A two-tailed P-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
3. Results
3.1. Extended-spectrum β-lactamase production
ESBL production was common among Prevotella isolates from people with CF and was associated with high MICs of β-lactam antibiotics. Fig. A1 summaries ESBL production among the different clinical Prevotella spp. isolated from adult and paediatric CF patients (Appendix). The size of the measured zones of inhibition, obtained with the combined disk assay compared with MICs of the β-lactam antibiotics in ESBL-positive and ESBL-negative Prevotella isolates are summarised in the Appendix (Fig. A2). There was a strong inverse relationship in all analyses between zone diameter of the indicator cephalosporin antibiotics and susceptibility, with higher MICs of amoxicillin, ceftazidime and AMC associated with smaller zones of inhibition (P < 0.001) (Fig. A2, Appendix). Several ESBL-positive Prevotella isolates were identified as having apparently weak enzyme activity; these isolates had low MICs with correspondingly large zones of inhibition and clustered with the ESBL-negative isolates (Fig. A2, Appendix). Similar weak in vitro ESBL activities have been identified in other bacterial genera and correlated with clinical failure in patients [13].
Approximately three-quarters of isolates tested (38/50; 76%) were classed as ESBL-positive. MIC results are summarised in Table 1. Resistance to the three β-lactam antibiotics was higher in ESBL-positive isolates compared with ESBL-negative isolates as demonstrated by higher MIC50 and MIC90 values among the former group. Furthermore, 23 (61%) of the 38 ESBL-producing isolates were also categorised as resistant (n = 15) or intermediate-resistant (n = 8) to AMC. In contrast, all ESBL-negative isolates (n = 12) were susceptible to AMC. Moreover, the ESBL-positive isolates had significantly higher MICs of amoxicillin, ceftazidime and AMC compared with ESBL-negative isolates (P < 0.001, Mann–Whitney test) (Fig. 1). The Appendix also details ESBL production by multiple Prevotella isolates cultured from an individual clinical sample provided by some people with CF (n = 18) (Table A2); the majority of people either harboured ESBL-positive isolates only (10/18; 56%) or both ESBL-positive and ESBL-negative isolates (7/18; 39%).
Table 1.
In vitro antimicrobial susceptibility of extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-positive and ESBL-negative clinical Prevotella isolates.
| ESBL production | MIC (mg/L) | % of isolates with indicated susceptibility | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Range | MIC50 | MIC90 | S | I | R | |
| ESBL-positive (n = 38) | ||||||
| Amoxicillin | 0.047 to >256 | 48 | >256 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Ceftazidime | 0.38 to >256 | 16 | 128 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| AMC | 0.047 to >256 | 8 | 48 | 39 | 21 | 39 |
|
| ||||||
| ESBL-negative (n = 12) | ||||||
| Amoxicillin | 0.023–96 | 0.064 | 2 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Ceftazidime | 0.047–2 | 0.5 | 1.5 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| AMC | 0.047–2 | 0.064 | 1 | 100 | 0 | 0 |
MIC, minimum inhibitory concentration; MIC50/90, MICs that inhibit 50% and 90% of the isolates, respectively; S, susceptible; I, intermediate-resistant; R, resistant; AMC, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid; N/A, no anaerobic breakpoints approved by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI).
Fig. 1.

Comparison of susceptibility (MICs) between ESBL-positive (n = 38) and ESBL-negative (n = 12) cystic fibrosis Prevotella isolates. In the box and whisker plot, the top and bottom boundaries of each box indicate the 75th and 25th quartile values, respectively, with the line inside the box representing the median (50th quartile). End of whiskers indicate the range. Any isolates recorded as having an MIC greater than the maximum (>256 mg/L) concentration on the Etest strip are shown as double the maximum concentration. MIC, minimum inhibitory concentration; ESBL, extended-spectrum β-lactamase.
3.2. Long-term prescription of antibiotics
Long-term antibiotic pressure may select for antibiotic resistance [11], and in our CF patient cohort four oral or inhaled antibiotics were prescribed chronically (oral: azithromycin and flucloxacillin; inhaled: tobramycin and colistin) (Table A1, Appendix). Therefore, we determined whether there was an association between detection of ESBL-producing isolates in patients currently prescribed these long-term antibiotic treatments compared with patients not prescribed the antibiotics. A similar percentage of ESBL-producing isolates was recovered from both groups (Fig. 2). In addition, we analysed whether there was a correlation between detection of ESBL-producing isolates and current chronic prescription of 0 (ESBL-positive, 86%), 1 (ESBL-positive, 83%), 2 (ESBL-positive, 67%) or ≥3 (ESBL-positive, 63%) antibiotics (Table A1, Appendix). As the number of long-term antibiotic treatments prescribed increased, the prevalence of ESBL-producing Prevotella isolates decreased; however, no statistical difference was detected (P = 0.180, Fisher’s exact test).
Fig. 2.

Prevalence of ESBL-producing Prevotella isolates from CF patients prescribed long-term antibiotics (flucloxacillin, azithromycin, tobramycin and colistin) compared with CF patients not prescribed chronic antibiotic treatments. ESBL, extended-spectrum β-lactamase; CF, cystic fibrosis.
3.3. The blaTEM gene
Twenty-two (44%) of the fifty clinical Prevotella isolates and E. coli NCTC 11560 were positive for blaTEM using the PCR screening assay. Sequence analysis revealed that of the 22 blaTEM partial genes (ca. 400 bp) from Prevotella, 21 (95%) sequences had 100% identity with blaTEM-116. As expected, the partial nucleotide sequence from E. coli NCTC 11560 had 100% identify with blaTEM-1. Furthermore, 18/22 (82%) blaTEM-positive Prevotella isolates were also positive for ESBL production using the combined disk method.
3.4. Prevotella isolates from paediatric or adult cystic fibrosis patients
ESBL production and presence of blaTEM were compared between those isolates cultured from adult versus paediatric CF patients. There was no association between CF group (adult versus paediatric) and ESBL production (P = 0.74, χ2 = 0.110) (Fig. 3), with 20/25 isolates (80%) from adult patients and 18/25 isolates (72%) from paediatric patients positive for ESBL production. However, a significant association was identified between CF group (adult versus paediatric) and the presence of blaTEM; 5 (20%) of 25 isolates from adult patients were positive for the gene compared with 17/25 (68%) isolates from paediatric patients (P = 0.002, χ2 = 9.821) (Fig. 3).
Fig. 3.

Comparison of ESBL production and detection of blaTEM between CF adult (n = 25) and CF paediatric (n = 25) isolates. *P < 0.05. ESBL, extended-spectrum β-lactamase; CF, cystic fibrosis.
3.5. Passive resistance
As polymicrobial lung infection is frequent in CF, we tested whether Prevotella may shield P. aeruginosa from antibiotics. At 48 h (Fig. 4), the difference in P. aeruginosa viable count between the co-culture and monoculture was >2 log10 CFU/mL [mean co-culture viable count, 1.63 × 106 CFU/mL; mono-culture, <2 × 102 CFU/mL (limit of detection)], indicating a protective effect by the β-lactamase-positive Prevotella isolate. Moreover, the difference in total viable count of P. aeruginosa at this time point was statistically greater when cultured with compared to without the Prevotella isolate (P = 0.03, paired samples t-test) (Fig. 4). We also found that survival of P. aeruginosa in the presence of Prevotella was not secondary to development of ceftazidime resistance [mean MIC = 0.22 mg/L (n = 10)].
Fig. 4.

Time–kill studies (mean ± standard deviation, n = 3) using ceftazidime at 64× the Pseudomonas aeruginosa minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) (32 mg/L). A protective effect (antagonism) by Prevotella was defined as a ≥2 log10 increase in viable count of P. aeruginosa at 48 h compared with that of the P. aeruginosa isolate alone. *P < 0.05.
4. Discussion
The Prevotella genus is commonly identified as belonging to the respiratory microbiota in people with chronic lung disease using molecular methods [1,2,8], and complex culture methods also detect Prevotella spp. in approximately one-third of CF pulmonary samples [4]. Despite evidence demonstrating the clinical importance of Prevotella at other body sites [23], we do not currently understand the role of this obligate anaerobe in infection and inflammation in chronic lung diseases. This is the first study to show that production of ESBLs is common among CF Prevotella isolates, which was associated with reduced susceptibility to β-lactam antibiotics. Future studies determining Prevotella susceptibility should consider production of this enzyme as a potentially important mechanism of resistance. We also present novel work investigating how β-lactamase-producing isolates from this genus may contribute to the pathogenesis of chronic lung infection and found that a β-lactamase-positive Prevotella isolate could shield P. aeruginosa from the antimicrobial action of ceftazidime.
Using the nitrocefin test [9], we previously identified that a high number of clinical Prevotella isolates from CF and non-CF sources produced β-lactamases (91/153; 59%). In this earlier study, we also found that β-lactamase production was correlated with reduced susceptibility to ceftazidime [9]. ESBLs, which belong to functional subgroup 2be [12], are one type of β-lactamase that have been associated with this spectrum of activity. ESBLs have also been associated with treatment failure with cephalosporin antibiotics and increased mortality in nosocomial infections [13,14]. However, in vitro production of ESBLs by Prevotella spp. has not been extensively investigated, with a single bacteraemia isolate identified as ESBL-positive in a case study reported by Mory et al. [24]. The combined disk method is used by clinical laboratories to confirm production of ESBLs [12]. In the current study, 38/50 (76%) Prevotella isolates tested were ESBL-positive using this method, and production of the enzyme was associated with significantly higher MICs of amoxicillin and ceftazidime. Although ESBLs are characteristically inhibited by clavulanic acid [12], the ESBL-positive isolates in this study also demonstrated reduced susceptibility to AMC. Mechanisms that may confer resistance to AMC include limiting access of the antibiotic to the target site via reduced permeability and expression of efflux pumps [19]. We previously demonstrated that expression of efflux pumps was not associated with AMC resistance amongst Prevotella spp. [19]; however, the role of outer membrane porins and reduced susceptibility to this antibiotic could be investigated.
Chronic antibiotic use has been correlated with an increased prevalence of multidrug-resistant bacteria in CF [11]. Long-term antibiotic treatments were commonly prescribed in the CF patient cohort included in this study and this fact prompted us to investigate the effect of such chronic antibiotic use on the prevalence of ESBL-positive Prevotella isolates [11]. However, no difference was detected between patients currently prescribed or not prescribed chronic antibiotic treatments and detection of ESBL-positive isolates. Intermittent episodes of acute pulmonary exacerbations are treated with additional antibiotics in CF. The effect of such short-term antibiotic use on ESBL-production among Prevotella isolates could form the basis of future studies.
Multiple blaTEM-type genes have been described, which belong to functional subgroups 2b, 2be, 2br and 2ber β-lactamases; these subgroups reflect the enzymes substrate spectrum [12]. For example, blaTEM-1 and blaTEM-2 encode β-lactamases that belong to subgroup 2b and confer resistance to penicillins and some cephalosporin antibiotics [12]. Amino acid substitutions within these two β-lactamases subsequently led to the description of ESBLs, in subgroup 2be, with a broadened spectrum of activity that includes the oxyimino-β-lactams such as ceftazidime [12]. Previously, blaTEM was found in 1/4 (25%) Prevotella endodontic strains tested [25]. In the current study, we detected blaTEM in 22/50 (44%) isolates using PCR-based detection. Sequence analysis revealed that 21/22 (95%) partial blaTEM nucleotide sequences had 100% identity with blaTEM-116. This gene has been detected previously in E. coli and K. pneumoniae isolates and was associated with high MICs against a range of β-lactam antibiotics including ceftazidime [26]. We also showed that 18/38 (47%) ESBL-positive isolates harboured blaTEM. Although these data provide some evidence to suggest that blaTEM, associated with Prevotella isolates, encodes an ESBL, further work is required to confirm this hypothesis. To characterise the role of this gene in antibiotic resistance in Prevotella, β-lactam susceptibility could be determined in a blaTEM knock-out strain. Furthermore, the results of this study potentially suggest that blaTEM detected amongst CF Prevotella isolates is geographically clustered: all isolates were cultured from people living in Northern Ireland and we observed the majority of isolates to harbour the same partial blaTEM-type gene.
We cannot discount that other isolates included in this study did not harbour blaTEM owing to our primers not recognising the target gene as a result of mutations within the target sequence. However, it is also possible that Prevotella isolates possess a different β-lactamase-encoding gene, e.g. those that encode SHV or CTX-M ESBLs. Furthermore, other enzymes that have been correlated with reduced susceptibility to β-lactam antibiotics in Prevotella spp. are CfxA-type β-lactamases, in functional subgroup 2e [27]. Previous work indicated that this β-lactamase has penicillinase and cephalosporinase properties with low MICs of third- and fourth-generation cephalosporins apparent, including cefotaxime and ceftazidime [27]. Giraud-Morin et al. also demonstrated that all Prevotella isolates positive for a cfxA-type gene (n = 62) were susceptible to ceftazidime [28]. In contrast, in our earlier study we identified an association between the presence of the cfxA-type gene and both amoxicillin and ceftazidime resistance amongst Prevotella isolates from various sources [19]. The reduced ceftazidime susceptibility observed may be due to mutations within the amino acid sequence of the CfxA-type β-lactamase, which are spectrum extending, or be the consequence of a different resistance mechanism [19,28]. If the former mechanism exists, then it is unclear whether production of such a CfxA-type β-lactamase by some Prevotella spp. would result in an ESBL phenotype that is detected by the combined disk method.
Moreover, Prevotella isolates may possess more than one gene encoding a β-lactamase. Therefore, a systematic evaluation of β-lactamases in Prevotella spp. should now be undertaken, e.g. using analytical isoelectric focusing.
The Prevotella isolates from paediatric CF patients were more likely to harbour blaTEM compared with isolates from adult CF patients. This may be due to the fact that blaTEM is usually plasmid-mediated and it is possible that in older CF patients, where the antibiotic treatment burden is greater compared with younger patients, resistance mechanisms are more likely to be chromosomally encoded. To investigate this theory, a longitudinal study is needed to assess changes in the location and expression of ESBL-encoding genes in isolates during disease progression.
Given that Prevotella spp. are detected as part of a polymicrobial infection in the respiratory tract, there is the potential that β-lactamase-producing Prevotella facilitate the persistence of susceptible isolates, from the same or different genus, in lethal concentrations of β-lactam antibiotics [15]. A recent study found that β-lactamase-producing Bacteroides spp. were able to shield a β-lactamase-negative E. coli isolate from the activity of ceftriaxone [29]. Likewise, we have shown that a β-lactamase-positive Prevotella isolate protected a susceptible P. aeruginosa isolate from the action of ceftazidime. Enabling this recognised pathogen to persist in the presence of ceftazidime may therefore be an indirect method by which Prevotella contribute to chronic lung infection, and studies focusing on passive antibiotic resistance are necessitated to confirm this finding with a larger panel of isolates and genera. A limitation of the in vitro co-culture model is that the CF pulmonary microbiota is complex with a diverse array of bacteria present and the existence of numerous intricate microbial interactions, which may also impact the survival of pathogens in the presence of antibiotics. Moreover, it is unlikely that ceftazidime would be administered alone in the treatment of CF respiratory exacerbations and this is not reflected by our current in vitro model. Nevertheless, when deciding on appropriate antibiotic treatment for pulmonary infection, clinicians may need to consider production of β-lactamases by all bacteria belonging to the microbiota, which subsequently protect themselves and other members of the community from antimicrobial agents.
5. Conclusions
In summary, we have shown that Prevotella isolated from CF airways infection produce ESBLs, which potentially contribute to reduced susceptibility to β-lactam antibiotics. Genotypic analysis revealed that >40% of Prevotella isolates harboured blaTEM, a clinically important β-lactamase-encoding gene in other bacterial genera. These data suggest that future studies investigating Prevotella susceptibility should examine the production of ESBLs by this genus. This study also supports the hypothesis that β-lactamase-producing Prevotella spp. shield recognised CF pathogens from treatment with ceftazidime, potentially contributing to the persistence of lung infection.
Supplementary Material
Highlights.
We describe ESBL production by Prevotella from the cystic fibrosis respiratory microbiota.
ESBL production was common among Prevotella isolates.
Higher MICs of β-lactam antibiotics were detected in ESBL-producing isolates.
The blaTEM gene was detected in >40% of Prevotella isolates.
A β-lactamase-positive Prevotella isolate shielded Pseudomonas aeruginosa from ceftazidime.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Mr Gerry McGrillen and Ms Solenn Cariou (School of Pharmacy, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, UK) for technical assistance.
Funding: This work was supported by grants from the Health and Social Care Research and Development, Public Health Agency, Northern Ireland; the Medical Research Council; and the US National Institutes of Health [grant nos. HL092964, HL084934 and 5R01 HL092964-04] through a US–Ireland Partnership Grant. MMT was supported by a UK National Institute for Health Research Career Scientist Award funded by the Health and Social Care Research and Development, Public Health Agency, Northern Ireland. LJS was supported by studentships from the Department of Employment and Learning, Northern Ireland.
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
Competing interests: None declared.
Ethical approval: Not required.
References
- 1.Tunney MM, Field TR, Moriarty TF, Patrick S, Doering G, Muhlebach MS, et al. Detection of anaerobic bacteria in high numbers in sputum from patients with cystic fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2008;177:995–1001. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200708-1151OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Tunney MM, Einarsson GG, Wei L, Drain M, Klem ER, Cardwell C, et al. The lung microbiota and bacterial abundance in patients with bronchiectasis when clinically stable and during exacerbation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013;18:1118–26. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201210-1937OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Fodor AA, Klem ER, Gilpin DF, Elborn JS, Boucher RC, Tunney MM, et al. The adult cystic fibrosis airway microbiota is stable over time and infection type, and highly resilient to antibiotic treatment of exacerbations. PLoS One. 2012;7:e45001. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0045001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Tunney MM, Klem ER, Fodor AA, Gilpin DF, Moriarty TF, McGrath SJ, et al. Use of culture and molecular analysis to determine the effect of antibiotic treatment on microbial community diversity and abundance during exacerbation in patients with cystic fibrosis. Thorax. 2011;66:579–84. doi: 10.1136/thx.2010.137281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Harris JK, De Groote MA, Sagel SD, Zemanick ET, Kapsner R, Penvari C, et al. Molecular identification of bacteria in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid from children with cystic fibrosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:20529–33. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0709804104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Bittar F, Richet H, Dubus JC, Reynaud-Gaubert M, Stremler N, Sarles J, et al. Molecular detection of multiple emerging pathogens in sputa from cystic fibrosis patients. PLoS One. 2008;3:e2908. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002908. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Zhao J, Schloss PD, Kalikin LM, Carmody LA, Foster BK, Petrosino JF, et al. Decade-long bacterial community dynamics in cystic fibrosis airways. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109:5809–14. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1120577109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Huang YJ, Kim E, Cox MJ, Brodie EL, Brown R, Wiener-Kronish JP, et al. A persistent and diverse airway microbiota present during chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations. OMICS. 2010;14:9–59. doi: 10.1089/omi.2009.0100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Sherrard LJ, Graham KA, McGrath SJ, McIlreavey L, Hatch J, Muhlebach MS, et al. Antibiotic resistance in Prevotella species isolated from patients with cystic fibrosis. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2013;68:2369–74. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkt191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Alauzet C, Marchandin H, Lozniewski A. New insights into Prevotella diversity and medical microbiology. Future Microbiol. 2010;5:1695–718. doi: 10.2217/fmb.10.126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Sherrard LJ, Tunney MM, Elborn JS. Antimicrobial resistance in the respiratory microbiota of people with cystic fibrosis. Lancet. 2014;384:703–13. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61137-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Bush K, Jacoby GA. Updated functional classification of β-lactamases. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010;54:969–76. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01009-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Paterson DL, Ko WC, Von Gottberg A, Casellas JM, Mulazimoglu L, Klugman KP, et al. Outcome of cephalosporin treatment for serious infections due to apparently susceptible organisms producing extended-spectrum β-lactamases: implications for the clinical microbiology laboratory. J Clin Microbiol. 2001;39:2206–12. doi: 10.1128/JCM.39.6.2206-2212.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Paterson DL, Ko WC, Von Gottberg A, Mohapatra S, Casellas JM, Goossens H, et al. Antibiotic therapy for Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteremia: implications of production of extended-spectrum β-lactamases. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;39:31–7. doi: 10.1086/420816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Brook I. β-Lactamase-producing bacteria in mixed infections. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2004;10:777–84. doi: 10.1111/j.1198-743X.2004.00962.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; twenty-third Informational supplement. Wayne, PA: CLSI; 2013. Document M100-S23. [Google Scholar]
- 17.UK Cystic Fibrosis Trust. Report of the UK Cystic Fibrosis Trust Working Group. Bromley, UK: UK Cystic Fibrosis Trust; 2009. Antibiotic treatment for cystic fibrosis. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Methods for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria; approved standard—eighth edition. Wayne, PA: CLSI; 2012. Document M11-A8. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Sherrard LJ, Schaible B, Graham KA, McGrath SJ, McIlreavey L, Hatch J, et al. Mechanisms of reduced susceptibility and genotypic prediction of antibiotic resistance in Prevotella isolated from cystic fibrosis (CF) and non-CF patients. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2014;69:2690–8. doi: 10.1093/jac/dku192. 2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Methods for determining bactericidal activity of antimicrobial agents; approved guideline. Wayne, PA: CLSI; 1999. Document M26-A. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Moriarty TF, McElnay JC, Elborn JS, Tunney MM. Sputum antibiotic concentrations: implications for treatment of cystic fibrosis lung infection. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2007;42:1008–17. doi: 10.1002/ppul.20671. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.White RL, Burgess DS, Manduru M, Bosso JA. Comparison of three different in vitro methods of detecting synergy: time–kill, checkerboard, and E test. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1996;40:1914–8. doi: 10.1128/aac.40.8.1914. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Seifert H, Dalhoff A, PRISMA Study Group German multicentre survey of the antibiotic susceptibility of Bacteroides fragilis group and Prevotella species isolated from intra-abdominal infections: results from the PRISMA study. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2010;65:2405–10. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkq321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Mory F, Carlier JP, Alauzet C, Thouvenin M, Schuhmacher H, Lozniewski A. Bacteremia caused by a metronidazole-resistant Prevotella sp. strain. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43:5380–3. doi: 10.1128/JCM.43.10.5380-5383.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Rocas IN, Siqueira JF., Jr Antibiotic resistance genes in anaerobic bacteria isolated from primary dental root canal infections. Anaerobe. 2012;18:576–80. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2012.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Jeong SH, Bae IK, Lee JH, Sohn SG, Kang GH, Jeon GJ, et al. Molecular characterization of extended-spectrum β-lactamases produced by clinical isolates of Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli from a Korean nationwide survey. J Clin Microbiol. 2004;42:2902–6. doi: 10.1128/JCM.42.7.2902-2906.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Madinier I, Fosse T, Giudicelli J, Labia R. Cloning and biochemical characterization of a class A β-lactamase from Prevotella intermedia. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2001;45:2386–9. doi: 10.1128/AAC.45.8.2386-2389.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Giraud-Morin C, Madinier I, Fosse T. Sequence analysis of cfxA2-like β-lactamases in Prevotella species. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2003;51:1293–6. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkg221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Stiefel U, Tima MA, Nerandzic MM. Metallo-β-lactamase-producing Bacteroides species can shield other members of the gut microbiota from antibiotics. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015;59:650–3. doi: 10.1128/AAC.03719-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
