Dear Editor,
Lymphatic research signifies a field of explosive discovery in recent years1,2,3. The lymphatic network penetrates most tissues in the body and its dysfunction has been found in a broad spectrum of disorders from inflammation to cancer metastasis and transplant rejection. However, to date, there are few effective treatments for lymphatic diseases. It is therefore important and urgent to investigate the fundamental mechanisms of pathological lymphangiogenesis (LG, the formation of new lymphatic vessels) for the development of new therapeutic strategies. The cornea offers an ideal site for pathological LG research due to its transparent nature and inducible LG3. Since there are no pre-existing or background vessels to consider, it is exceptionally straightforward and accurate to assess LG in response to a pathological insult, such as inflammation.
The Wnt system is known to be involved in multiple processes, such as cell fate determination, stem cell maintenance, and tumor metastasis4,5. Up to this stage, there is no information on its potential roles in inflammatory LG, which is the focus of this study. Using a repertoire of in vivo inflammatory LG and in vitro cell culture systems and methods, we herein report, for the first time, that monocyte-derived Wnt signaling is involved in inflammatory LG response.
As shown in Figure 1A and 1B, we first set out to investigate whether monocyte-derived Wnt signaling was involved in inflammatory LG using the standard corneal suture placement model3 and the monocyte conditional knockout mice of Wntless (Wls), a gene encoding a transporter for all Wnt ligands6. Targeted deletion of Wls in monocyte lineage was achieved by crossbreeding Csf1R-cre and Wls-flox mice. Our results demonstrated a significant reduction of lymphatic coverage area in Wlsfl/+;cfms-icre knockout mice compared with wild-type control littermates. Moreover, real-time PCR data revealed a transcription decrease of vascular endothelial growth factor-C (VEGF-C, a critical mediator of LG7) in the corneas of the knockout mice (Figure 1C). In addition, Arginine-1 (Arg-1), a well-characterized gene induced upon macrophage activation, was also down-modulated in the knockout mice (Figure 1C). This gene is a fingerprint of the alternative activated macrophages (M2), which mediate pro-lymphangiogenic response8. Taken together, these data indicate that Wnt ligands play a role in regulating inflammatory LG and their secretion by macrophages sustains a high level of VEGF-C within the tissue.
Our further analysis showed that in Wls monocyte conditional knockout mice, there was a significant reduction of Wnt5a in the inflamed corneas, compared with control littermates (Figure 1C). In addition, we performed in situ hybridization analysis on sutured wild-type corneas and confirmed that the presence of Wnt5a transcript in inflamed corneal stroma displays an expression pattern similar to that of F4/80 (a macrophage specific marker) transcript (Supplementary information, Figure S1A). This result indicated macrophage as a major source of Wnt5a in the inflamed cornea and was further corroborated by antibody staining against Wnt5a and F4/80 (Supplementary information, Figure S1B). Wnt5a signals were detected on and around macrophages and lymphatic vessels.
To further investigate the contribution of monocyte-derived Wnt5a to the phenotype, we generated Wnt5a monocyte conditional knockout mice by crossbreeding Csf1R-cre and Wnt5a-flox mice9. Interestingly, Wnt5afl/fl;cfms-icre mice also showed reduced LG compared with control cfms-icre littermates with the corneal suture placement model (Figure 1D and 1E). In agreement with the observation in the Wls knockout mice, the transcription levels of VEGF-C and Arg-1 in the corneas were also down-modulated in Wnt5a knockout mice besides Wnt5a, highlighting a less pro-lymphangiogenic microenvironment (Figure 1F).
We next interrogated whether the phenotype observed in Wnt5 knockout mice was due to impaired homing of macrophages in the inflamed tissues of the transgenic mice. As shown in Figure 1G and 1H, our results from immunofluorescent microscopic analysis on the macrophage-specific marker F4/80 in sutured corneas revealed no significant difference in macrophage infiltration between Wnt5a knockout and control littermates. Similarly, by cytofluorimetric analysis of F4/80 positive cells, no significant difference was observed in the numbers of peritoneal macrophages between the knockout and control mice (Figure 1I and 1J). Taken together, these data demonstrate that Wnt5a is dispensable for macrophage homing in peripheral tissues and that the reduced inflammatory LG cannot be ascribed to a reduced number of macrophages in the tissue.
We then investigated in more detail the phenotype of Wnt5a-deficient monocytes and performed in vitro macrophage differentiation assay using bone marrow (BM) monocytes from either Wnt5a monocyte conditional knockout mice or control littermates. As shown in Figure 1K and 1L and Supplementary information, Figure S1C, 10 days after granulocyte monocyte-colony stimulator factor (GM-CSF) stimulation, we observed a decreased number of F4/80+ and CD11b+ cells in Wnt5a knockout mice, as compared with control littermates, indicating a role of Wnt5a in the function of macrophage differentiation.
To further characterize the BM-derived macrophages, we performed in vitro activation assays and analyzed classical (M1) and alternative (M2) responses. We stimulated macrophages with a combination of interferon-gamma (INF-γ) and lipopolysaccharide (LPS) for the M1 activation and interleukin-4 (IL-4) for the M2 activation. Results from our studies showed no difference in the upregulation of TNF-α production in the INF-γ/LPS stimulated macrophages between the Wnt5 knockout and control mice. In contrast, the Arg-1 upregulation upon IL-4 stimulation was impaired in the Wnt5a knockout macrophages (Figure 1M). This last datum suggests that Wnt5a plays a role in skewing macrophages toward the M2 phenotype. Moreover, the down-modulation of Arg-1 is in agreement with our previous results from the inflamed corneas, as shown in Figure 1F.
To further corroborate the defective M2 activation of Wnt5a knockout macrophages, we examined the amount of VEGF-C protein secreted by BM-derived macrophages upon IL-4 stimulation. By arraying the cytokines present in the conditional medium, we determined that the level of VEGF-C was significantly decreased in Wnt5a knockout macrophages (Figure 1N).
In summary, this study provides the first evidence that Wnt5a is directly involved in the pathological response of inflammatory LG. Moreover, Wnt5a acts through the monocyte-derived cells and regulates VEGF-C production and macrophage phenotype. The nature of this regulation is in contrast to how monocyte-derived Wnt5a regulates blood capillaries in developing retinas where Wnt5a acts via the Flt-1 pathway10. This discrepancy is not surprising since Wnt signaling often presents distinct outcomes depending on cell or tissue type and developmental versus pathological stage11. Recently, a study on Wnt5a conventional (non-conditional) knockout mice showed reduced number but increased size of dermal lymphatic capillaries at embryonic day 18.512, which indicates a developmental defect resulting from cumulative role of Wnt5a in all cell types, known and yet-to-be determined. In contrast, we observed reduced number but not increased size of lymphatic vessels in this inflammation study on adult mice taking advantage of the cell type-specific conditional knockout mice. Our work reveals and advocates a critical role for monocyte-derived Wnt5a in regulating inflammatory LG. Further investigation on this pathological phenomenon holds great promise for developing novel cell- and/or molecule-based therapies for the widely occurring LG diseases in the body.
Acknowledgments
This work is supported in part by grants from the National Institutes of Health and the University of California at Berkeley (LC). We acknowledge the following people at University of California at Berkeley for technical assistance: (1) from LC Lab at the Center for Eye Disease and Development, Program in Vision Science, and School of Optometry: Guangyu Li, Gyeong Jin Kang, Eric Huang, Valerie Su, Ying Wen and Narae Lee; and (2) from the Department of Molecular and Cell Biology: Prof John Ngai. We would also like to thank Core Translational Module at Program in Vision Science and School of Optometry at University of California at Berkeley for statistical assistance.
Footnotes
(Supplementary information is linked to the online version of the paper on the Cell Research website.)
Supplementary Information
References
- 1Alitalo K. Nat Med 2011; 17:1371–1380. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 2Cueni LN, Detmar M. Lymphat Res Biol 2008; 6:109–122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 3Chen L. Lymphology 2009; 42:66–76. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 4Nusse R. Cell Res 2005; 15:28–32. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 5Clevers H, Loh KM, Nusse R. Science 2014; 346:1248012. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 6Carpenter AC, Rao S, Wells JM, et al. Genesis 2010; 48:554–558. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 7Cursiefen C, Chen L, Borges LP, et al. J Clin Invest 2004; 113:1040–1050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 8Watari K, Shibata T, Kawahara A, et al. PLoS One 2014; 9:e99568. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 9Yun K, Ajima R, Sharma N, et al. Hum Mol Genet 2014; 23:6807–6814. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 10Stefater JA 3rd, Lewkowich I, Rao S, et al. Nature 2011; 474:511–515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 11van Amerongen R, Fuerer C, Mizutani M, et al. Dev Biol 2012; 369:101–114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 12Buttler K, Becker J, Pukrop T, et al. Dev Biol 2013; 381:365–376. [DOI] [PubMed]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.