Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Feb 9.
Published in final edited form as: Analyst. 2016 Feb 8;141(4):1209–1213. doi: 10.1039/c5an02497h

Genetically Anchored Fluorescent Probes for Subcellular Specific Imaging of Hydrogen Sulfide

Jianwei Chen a,#, Mingkun Zhao b,#, Xiqian Jiang a, Antons Sizovs a, Meng C Wang c, Christopher R Provost e, Jia Huang f, Jin Wang a,d,
PMCID: PMC4747831  NIHMSID: NIHMS754647  PMID: 26806071

Abstract

Imaging hydrogen sulfide (H2S) at the subcellular resolution will greatly improve the understanding of functions of this signaling molecule. Taking advantage of the protein labeling technologies, we report a general strategy for the development of organelle specific H2S probes, which enables sub-cellular H2S imaging essentially in any organelles of interest.


Hydrogen sulfide (H2S) is the most recently discovered member of gasotransmitters, along with nitric oxide (NO) and carbon monoxide.1 H2S is mainly produced by three enzymes, including cystathionine β-synthase (CBS), cystathionine γ-lyase (CSE), and 3-mercaptopyruvate sulfurtransferase (MST).2 H2S has been found to play many important roles in the regulation of blood pressure, cardiac response to ischemia injury, and inflammation.2 It can also perform S-sulfhydration on proteins to modulate their activities.3 It is known that the subcellular distribution of H2S producing enzymes changes under different physiological conditions. For example, liver ischemia can lead to the accumulation of CBS from cytosol into mitochondria.4 In addition, cytoplasmic CBS and CSE can be translocated into nucleus upon SUMO modification despite the roles of this translocation are unclear.5 Similarly, distribution and functions of H2S in different organelles are not well understood. It was reported that H2S can not only regulate mitochondrial bioenergetics functions,6 but also augment synaptic neurotransmission in the nucleus of the solitary tract.7 Because variations in the spatial and temporal production of H2S can induce different downstream biological effects, it is important to track H2S with subcellular resolution.1 In this contribution, we present a new class of organelle-specific fluorescent probes for H2S leveraging protein labeling techniques and demonstrate its applications in cells.

Several fluorescent H2S probes for intracellular imaging were previously developed.8-12 The groups of Chang and Wang took advantage of the reducing potential of H2S to convert azides to amines to achieve a “turn-on” fluorescence response. Xian et al. reported a probe containing bis-electrophilic centers for H2S detection.13 He et al. designed a Michael addition-based H2S probe.14 These probes, however, lack organelle specificity. The groups of Kim and Guo applied positively charged molecules as targeting moieties to direct H2S probes to mitochondria,15, 16 while Cui et al. developed a morpholine containing H2S probe for lysosome targeting.17 However, these approaches cannot be generalized to other organelles and to H2S producing enzymes, such as CBS and CSE. Ai et al. developed a genetically encoded H2S probe based on an unnatural amino acid modified green fluorescent protein, which has the potential to fuse with any subcellular locating sequences to achieve organelle specific H2S detection.18 The caveat for Ai's H2S probe is currently limited to green fluorescence proteins.19 Therefore, a generalized alternative approach for organelle specific H2S probe with broad color palette is needed for H2S related research.

Fluorescent labeling of specific proteins in live cells has achieved significant advancement in recent years.20 Among these techniques, SNAP/CLIP-tag® technologies demonstrated to be reliable and applicable to wide range of target proteins. The SNAP/CLIP-tag® technology, developed by Johnsson and co-workers, is based on the O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase (AGT) fusion protein which, once it is fused with a protein of interest, reacts covalently with labeling molecules.21 These protein labeling techniques have been widely applied for specific labeling of proteins in live cells21, 22 and in animals,23 and directing fluorescent probes to detect Ca2+, Zn2+ and H2O2 in specific organelles.24-27

Our design of the organelle-specific fluorescent probes for H2S is composed of an azide based H2S fluorescent probe and a tagging substrate for SNAP/CLIP technologies (Figure 1). This strategy can be applied to any subcellular locations of interest. In this contribution, we demonstrate its applicability by developing H2S fluorescent probes that specifically target mitochondria and for the first time – the nucleus.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Illustration of genetically anchored fluorescent probes for subcellular specific imaging of hydrogen sulfide. In this specific example, cyan represents a nucleus localizing protein; orange represents CLIP-tag enzyme, which can specifically react with a CLIP-tag substrate CouN3-BC. Upon reacting with H2S, non-fluorescent CouN3 is converted to fluorescent CouNH2.

We chose 7-azido-coumarin (CouN3) as the H2S probe that fluoresces with 405 nm of excitation because i) it has been established that the azide group can quench the coumarin fluorescence, and upon reacting with H2S, azide can be converted to an amine group, which restores the fluorescence of coumarin;28 ii) coumarin can be applied in two-photon fluorescence imaging, which facilitates its in vivo applications;29 and iii) our design can potentially complement with Ai's H2S responsive GFP in a multi-color organelle specific H2S detection.19 CouN3 was conjugated with a O2-benzylcytosine (BC) moiety – the CLIP-tag substrate (Figure 2A). The synthesis of the CouN3-BC conjugate is described in the Supporting Information (SI).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Reaction specificities of H2S fluorescent probe CouN3-BC. (A) Chemical structure of organelle specific H2S probe CouN3-BC. (B) Normalized time dependent fluorescence emission spectra of CouN3-BC (10 μM, λex = 405 nm) upon reacting with 100 μM of H2S in PBS (pH 7.4). The spectra were normalized to the emission intensity at 450 nm at time 0. (C) Normalized fluorescence changes of CouN3-BC (10 μM, λex = 405 nm, λem = 450 nm) upon reacting with a series of redox species in PBS (pH 7.4) for 1 h. The concentrations of GSH and cysteine are 5 mM and 500 μM, respectively. The concentrations of all the other redox species, including H2S, are 100 μM. The fluorescence intensities at 450 nm were normalized to that of unreacted CouN3-BC. Note: All the reactions were carried out under dark and anaerobic conditions to avoid potential photodegradation of the probe and oxidation of reductive species.

The spectroscopic changes and reaction kinetics of CouN3-BC with H2S were investigated. CouN3-BC exhibits very minimal fluorescence with an excitation wavelength at 405 nm (Figures 2B and S1). Upon reacting CouN3-BC with H2S, the fluorescence at 450 nm increases 35 folds within 1 h (Figure 2B). It should be noted that Barrios et al. reported a 4-fold increase of fluorescence intensity for a similar H2S probe upon reacting with 100 μM of H2S for 1 h,28 which is ~9 times lower than the fluorescence enhancement from our observation. Based on our experiments, we found that CouN3-BC is photosensitive and aged CouN3-BC usually has 4-5 folds higher baseline fluorescence than the newly prepared counterpart. Therefore, all our CouN3-BC samples used in the fluorescence measurements were purified with flash chromatography in the dark and used immediately. In addition, because H2S solution is prone to oxidation in air, we carried all the experiments in Figure 2 under anaerobic conditions. We suspect that the experimental details may account for the discrepancy between our and Barrios’ studies. In order to verify that CouNH2-BC is the product for the reaction between CouN3-BC and H2S, we applied liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) to monitor the reaction and found a new product with molecular weight that matches CouNH2-BC (Figure S2).

CouN3-BC is a highly specific probe for H2S. In order to test the reaction specificity of CouN3-BC towards H2S, we incubated CouN3-BC with various reductive and oxidative species for 1 h and monitored the changes of the fluorescence intensity at 450 nm. As shown in Figure 2C, the fluorescence intensity increased significantly when CouN3-BC was incubated with PBS buffer containing 100 μM of H2S. In contrast, there were minimal fluorescence changes observed when CouN3-BC was incubated with other sulfur containing compounds, intracellular reductants or oxidants. Our result is consistent with previous studies using azides as a H2S specific group18, 30 and demonstrate the H2S specificity of CouN3-BC. It should be noted that in order to simplify this model study, CouN3-BC was used instead of the conjugate of CouN3 and CLIP-tag protein, which is the functional unit inside cells. Because the BC moiety has little absorbance at 405 nm, we do not expect that it interferes with the fluorescence of CouNH2. Furthermore, based on Lippard's study, AGT conjugated Zn2+ probe has very similar reactivity to the parent probe.24 Therefore, we believe that CouN3-BC is a reasonable model compound to study the spectroscopic changes and reactivity in the presence of H2S and other redox species.

CouN3-BC is cell-permeable and can cross plasma membrane in a concentration dependent manner. In order to apply CouN3-BC for live cell imaging, it should be able to permeate cells. In addition, the excess CouN3-BC that has not reacted with the CLIP-tag proteins should diffuse out of the cells in the washing steps. To test the cell permeability of CouN3-BC, we incubated CouN3-BC with HeLa cells for 30 min, followed by the addition of H2S for another 30 min. We observed strong fluorescence inside the cells, indicating CouN3-BC can enter cells (Figure S3). When incubation was followed by PBS washing, however, subsequent addition of H2S solution did not induce any fluorescence increase, indicating that the excess CouN3-BC that does not react with the CLIP-tag protein can diffuse out of cells (Figure S3).

CouN3-BC can probe the changes of H2S levels with subcellular specificity through conjugation with CLIP-tag fusion proteins. In this “proof-of-concept” study, we chose nucleus and mitochondria as the subcellular targets for CouN3-BC because many of the known H2S mediated biological processes are involved with these two organelles.3, 5, 7 Two plasmids pCLIP-H2B and pCLIP-COX8A were used to transiently express CLIP fusion proteins to localize CouN3-BC to nucleus and mitochondria, respectively. The pCLIP-H2B construct targets the CLIP tag to the nuclear matrix with the help of the nucleus localization sequence on the fused histone H2B protein.31 The pCLIP-COX8A plasmid expresses cytochrome c oxidase subunit VIIIA (COX8A) with a fused CLIP tag that localizes at the inner membrane and the matrix of mitochondria.25

HeLa cells were transiently transfected with pCLIP-H2B and pCLIP-COX8A for 72 h using lipofectamine® 3000, and then incubated with CouN3-BC to localize the H2S probe to nucleus and mitochondria, respectively. Excess CouN3-BC was removed by PBS washing. Subsequently, exogenous H2S (250 μM) was added into the medium to induce the fluorescence responses from the H2S probe. Secondary staining was also performed to confirm the organelle specificity of the H2S probe. The negative control cells were transfected with control vectors. All the cells were treated with CouN3-BC and H2S, and their corresponding controls.

For the negative control cells, there was minimal fluorescence observed in the blue (405 nm) channel even in the presence of both CouN3-BC and H2S, indicating that CouN3-BC can be efficiently removed if there are no CLIP-tag fusion proteins inside cells (Figure 3).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Confocal microscopic study of the organelle specificity of CouN3-BC (blue) and its responsiveness to cellular H2S concentration changes. HeLa cells expressing pCLIP-H2B, pCLIP-COX8A, or a control plasmid were incubated with CouN3-BC (10 μM), or NaHS (250 μM) or both. The organelle specificity was confirmed by a secondary staining with either NucRed® Live 647 nuclear stain (red) or an Alexa 488 conjugated antibody against COX-IV (green). Quantitative colocalization analyses showed a significant correlation based on the Pearson's and Manders’ coefficients (Table S1). Scale bar is equal to 10 μm.

For pCLIP-H2B transfected cells, there was minimal fluorescence observed in the blue channel if either CouN3-BC or H2S was added to the cells, suggesting that there is low background from cells and CouN3-BC (Figure 3). In contrast, significant fluorescence increase was observed in the nucleus only when cells were treated with both CouN3-BC and H2S, indicating an organelle specific H2S response. It should be noted that these organelle-specific H2S probes can only reflect the presence of H2S in that organelle, but cannot determine whether H2S is produced in the organelle due to the diffusive nature of H2S inside cells.

In order to further confirm the organelle specificity of the H2S probe, the cells were stained with NucRed® Live 647 nuclear stain and an Alexa 488 conjugated antibody against COX-IV,32 cytochrome c oxidase complex as a marker of the mitochondrial inner membrane (off-target control). From the pseudo colored merged image of different channels, we can observe a substantial area in purple (overlay of the blue and red channels, Figure 3) indicating a significant accumulation of the H2S probe in nucleus. Quantitative colocalization analyses further confirmed a significant correlation based on the Pearson's and Manders’ coefficients (Table S1). We could not detect any overlap between the blue and green channels, demonstrating minimal off-target effect of CouN3-BC. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first example of a nuclear specific H2S probe.

To demonstrate the general applicability of our genetically anchored H2S probe, a similar experiment was performed using pCLIP-COX8A treated cells. We also observed substantial co-localization (cyan in Figure 3) of the fluorescence signals from the mitochondria targeted probe and the Alexa 488 conjugated antibody against COX-IV, a mitochondrial marker protein (Table S1). In contrast, little co-localization was observed between the blue channel (probe) and the red channel (nucleus), suggesting minimal off-target effect for the mitochondria targeted H2S probe. It should be cautioned that the fluorescence of CouNH2 can be quenched in acidic environment due to protonation of the aromatic amino group. Therefore, sensitivities of these probes may be affected if applied in endosomes or lysosomes.

The organelle specific CouN3 probe is also responsive to endogenous H2S. It is reported that pharmacological donors of NO can up-regulate cysteine uptake and CBS activity, resulting in increase of H2S production.33 To test whether CouN3 probe is responsive to endogenous H2S, HeLa cells were transiently transfected with pCLIP-H2B, and then incubated with CouN3-BC to localize the H2S probe to nucleus. Subsequently, cells were treated with sodium nitroprusside (SNP), an NO donor, to induce H2S production. Consistent with previous study,34 SNP treated cells showed significantly higher H2S concentration in nucleus than the control cells (Figure 4). Considering that CBS is mainly distributed in mitochondria,35 we speculate that H2S produced in mitochondria by CBS can diffuse to the nucleus to trigger cellular signaling. Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and NO are known for their fast metabolism and short diffusion range. Based on our observation, different from NO and H2O2, H2S may act as a long-range signaling molecule.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Confocal microscopic study of the nuclear specific CouN3-BC (blue) and its responsiveness to H2S concentration changes induced by SNP, an NO donor. HeLa cells expressing pCLIP-H2B were incubated with CouN3-BC (10 μM), and then treated with or without SNP (100 μM). The organelle specificity was confirmed by a secondary staining with either NucRed® Live 647 nuclear stain (red) or an Alexa 488 conjugated antibody against COX-IV

In summary, the protein labeling technology provides an opportunity to direct the intracellular distribution of H2S probes. We developed coumarin based H2S probes, which can be specifically localized to nucleus and mitochondria depending on the tag fusion proteins used. This strategy can be extended to other fluorophores and cell labeling techniques, such as HaloTag®, and applied to other organelles and H2S producing enzymes, such as CBS and CSE, to elucidate H2S related biology.

Supplementary Material

ESI

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by the National Institutes of Health (R01-GM115622 to J.W.; R01-AG045183 to M.C.W.), the Welch Foundation (Q-1798 to J.W.), and Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas (CPRIT R1104 to J.W.), Centre for Drug Discovery, the Integrated Microscopy Core, the Optical Imaging and Vital Microscopy Core, the Cytometry and Cell Sorting Core, the Dan L. Duncan Cancer Centre at Baylor College of Medicine and the Texas Medical Centre Digestive Diseases Centre (NIDDK 56338).

Footnotes

Electronic Supplementary Information (ESI) available: Experimental procedures and characterization

Notes and references

  • 1.Yang G, Wu L, Jiang B, Yang W, Qi J, Cao K, Meng Q, Mustafa AK, Mu W, Zhang S, Snyder SH, Wang R. Science. 2008;322:587–590. doi: 10.1126/science.1162667. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Li L, Rose P, Moore PK. Annual review of pharmacology and toxicology. 2011;51:169–187. doi: 10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-010510-100505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Paul BD, Snyder SH. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology. 2012;13:499–507. doi: 10.1038/nrm3391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Teng H, Wu B, Zhao K, Yang G, Wu L, Wang R. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2013;110:12679–12684. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1308487110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Agrawal N, Banerjee R. PloS one. 2008;3:e4032. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Modis K, Bos EM, Calzia E, van Goor H, Coletta C, Papapetropoulos A, Hellmich MR, Radermacher P, Bouillaud F, Szabo C. British journal of pharmacology. 2014;171:2123–2146. doi: 10.1111/bph.12368. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Austgen JR, Hermann GE, Dantzler HA, Rogers RC, Kline DD. Journal of neurophysiology. 2011;106:1822–1832. doi: 10.1152/jn.00463.2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Chan J, Dodani SC, Chang CJ. Nature chemistry. 2012;4:973–984. doi: 10.1038/nchem.1500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Wang K, Peng H, Wang B. Journal of cellular biochemistry. 2014;115:1077–1022. doi: 10.1002/jcb.24762. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Lin VS, Chang CJ. Current opinion in chemical biology. 2012;16:595–601. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2012.07.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Wang R, Yu F, Chen L, Chen H, Wang L, Zhang W. Chem Commun (Camb) 2012;48:11757–11759. doi: 10.1039/c2cc36088h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Yu F, Han X, Chen L. Chem Commun (Camb) 2014;50:12234–12249. doi: 10.1039/c4cc03312d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Liu C, Pan J, Li S, Zhao Y, Wu LY, Berkman CE, Whorton AR, Xian M. Angewandte Chemie. 2011;123:10511–10513. doi: 10.1002/anie.201104305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Qian Y, Karpus J, Kabil O, Zhang S-Y, Zhu H-L, Banerjee R, Zhao J, He C. Nature communications. 2011;2:495. doi: 10.1038/ncomms1506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Bae SK, Heo CH, Choi DJ, Sen D, Joe EH, Cho BR, Kim HM. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2013;135:9915–9923. doi: 10.1021/ja404004v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Chen Y, Zhu C, Yang Z, Chen J, He Y, Jiao Y, He W, Qiu L, Cen J, Guo Z. Angewandte Chemie. 2013;52:1688–1691. doi: 10.1002/anie.201207701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Liu T, Xu Z, Spring DR, Cui J. Organic letters. 2013;15:2310–2313. doi: 10.1021/ol400973v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Chen S, Chen ZJ, Ren W, Ai HW. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2012;134:9589–9592. doi: 10.1021/ja303261d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ren W, Ai HW. Sensors. 2013;13:15422–15433. doi: 10.3390/s131115422. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Giepmans BN, Adams SR, Ellisman MH, Tsien RY. Science. 2006;312:217–224. doi: 10.1126/science.1124618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Gautier A, Juillerat A, Heinis C, Correa IR, Jr., Kindermann M, Beaufils F, Johnsson K. Chem Biol. 2008;15:128–136. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2008.01.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Los GV, Encell LP, McDougall MG, Hartzell DD, Karassina N, Zimprich C, Wood MG, Learish R, Ohana RF, Urh M, Simpson D, Mendez J, Zimmerman K, Otto P, Vidugiris G, Zhu J, Darzins A, Klaubert DH, Bulleit RF, Wood KV. ACS Chem Biol. 2008;3:373–382. doi: 10.1021/cb800025k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Bojkowska K, Santoni de Sio F, Barde I, Offner S, Verp S, Heinis C, Johnsson K, Trono D. Chem Biol. 2011;18:805–815. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2011.03.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Tomat E, Nolan EM, Jaworski J, Lippard SJ. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2008;130:15776–15777. doi: 10.1021/ja806634e. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Srikun D, Albers AE, Nam CI, Iavarone AT, Chang CJ. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2010;132:4455–4465. doi: 10.1021/ja100117u. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Bannwarth M, Correa IR, Sztretye M, Pouvreau S, Fellay C, Aebischer A, Royer L, Rois E, Johnsson K. ACS Chem Biol. 2009;4:179–190. doi: 10.1021/cb800258g. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Newman RH, Fosbrink MD, Zhang J. Chemical reviews. 2011;111:3614–3666. doi: 10.1021/cr100002u. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Thorson MK, Majtan T, Kraus JP, Barrios AM. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2013;52:4641–4644. doi: 10.1002/anie.201300841. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Chen B, Li W, Lv C, Zhao M, Jin H, Jin H, Du J, Zhang L, Tang X. The Analyst. 2013;138:946–951. doi: 10.1039/c2an36113b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Lippert AR, New EJ, Chang CJ. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2011;133:10078–10080. doi: 10.1021/ja203661j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Klein T, Loschberger A, Proppert S, Wolter S, van de Linde S, Sauer M. Nature methods. 2011;8:7–9. doi: 10.1038/nmeth0111-7b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Nisoli E, Clementi E, Paolucci C, Cozzi V, Tonello C, Sciorati C, Bracale R, Valerio A, Francolini M, Moncada S, Carruba MO. Science. 2003;299:896–899. doi: 10.1126/science.1079368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Kolluru GK, Shen X, Kevil CG. Redox biology. 2013;1:313–318. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2013.05.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Wang X, Sun J, Zhang W, Ma X, Lv J, Tang B. Chemical Science. 2013;4:2551–2556. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Bhattacharyya S, Saha S, Giri K, Lanza IR, Nair KS, Jennings NB, Rodriguez-Aguayo C, Lopez-Berestein G, Basal E, Weaver AL, Visscher DW, Cliby W, Sood AK, Bhattacharya R, Mukherjee P. PloS one. 2013;8:e79167. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

ESI

RESOURCES