Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2015 Aug 15;137(2):627–629.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2015.06.041

GATA3 haploinsufficiency does not block allergic sensitization or atopic disease

Monica G Lawrence 1, Jennifer W Leiding 2,3,*, Jonathan J Lyons 4,*, Amy P Hsu 2, Celeste C Nelson 4, Nina Jones 5, Alan Fitzgerald 2, Wade W Chien 6,7, Lisa Workman 1, Thomas A Platts-Mills 1, Carmen Brewer 6, Rachel I Gafni 8, Kelly D Stone 4, Joshua D Milner 4,#, Steven M Holland 2,#
PMCID: PMC4747849  NIHMSID: NIHMS709260  PMID: 26282285

To the Editor

GATA3 is the major transcription factor that drives Th2 differentiation and inhibits T-BET driven Th1 differentiation from naïve CD4+ T cells in response to Th2 skewing conditions [1]. GATA3 is also expressed in the developing parathyroid glands, inner ear, and kidneys and is critical to vertebrate embryonic development [2]. Gata3 homozygous knockout mice (Gata3−/−) have a total block of T cell differentiation and die in utero[3, 4], while hemizygous conditional deletion of Gata3 in CD4+ T cells (Gata3fl/+) leads to impaired IL-4 and IgE production, Th1 cytokine production even in Th2 priming conditions, and failure to control parasitic infection, suggesting a Gata3 gene dosage effect on IL-4 mediated Th2 responses [5]. In humans, haploinsufficiency of GATA3 leads to a rare autosomal dominant condition characterized by variably penetrant hypoparathyroidism, sensorineural hearing loss (deafness) and renal anomalies (HDR syndrome) [6]. Previously published work in patients with HDR syndrome has demonstrated an absence of humoral or cellular immunodeficiency, with no clinical history of recurrent infections [1, 6, 7], but has suggested a modest impairment in Th2 responses in vitro. However, further investigation into the functional and clinical relevance of this impairment in vivo is lacking.

We therefore examined 4 patients from 3 families with HDR syndrome for their ability to mount a clinical allergic response as well as produce evidence of allergic sensitization on skin prick and serum IgE testing (please see the Methods section in this article’s Online Repository at www.jacionline.org). Phenotypic variation was found within one family (patients 1 and 2) agreeing with previous reports of variable expressivity within families with HDR syndrome (Table E1) [7, 8]. Within our cohort three novel missense mutations (L284R, G289E, M294R) and 1 previously described single base pair deletion (c.708delC) were identified in GATA3 [8]. None of the patients had a history of severe/recurrent infection or autoimmunity. There were no abnormalities in white blood cell counts or T lymphocyte subsets. Immunoglobulin production and response to vaccines were normal. Autoantibodies associated with rheumatologic disease were absent.

Patient 4 reported a history of significant atopic disease including allergic rhinitis, atopic dermatitis and food allergy to soybean and peanut consisting of immediate urticaria with ingestion (Table 1). This allergy developed in early childhood and persisted into adulthood. Skin prick testing of this patient to a panel of foods and environmental allergens was positive only to cockroach mix and soybean. All other skin prick tests were negative and there was no detectable allergen-specific IgE (sIgE); total serum IgE was not elevated (11.1 IU/ml, normal 0–90 IU/mL). Among the other three patients, despite a negative clinical history of atopic disease, two had evidence of sensitization to at least one aeroallergen identified by skin prick test. None of the patients had an elevated total serum IgE and none had detectable sIgE to any allergens tested.

Table 1.

Atopic evaluation of GATA3 haploinsufficient subjects

Clinical History Patient 1 Patient 2 Patient 3 Patient 4
Allergic Rhinitis None None None Seasonal allergic rhinitis managed with daily oral antihistamines and intranasal corticosteroids
Asthma None None None None
Atopic Dermatitis None None None Yes, as a child
Food Allergy None None None Soy and peanuts - urticaria
Chronic Urticaria/Angioedema None None None None
Anaphylaxis None None None None
Skin prick testing wheal x flare, in mm) Patient 1 Patient 2 Patient 3 Patient 4
Histamine (positive control) 6x30 6x5 5x8.5 5.5x27.5
Morphine 10mg/ml (positive control) 4.5x12 3x3 3.5x3.5 4.5x12.5
Saline (negative control) 0x0 0x0 0x0 0x0
Aeroallergens (13 tested) D. pteronyssinus 4x13 None D. pteronyssinus 3x3
Mouse epithelium 3x3
Oak mix 3x3
Cockroach mix 3x3
Food allergens (7 tested) None None None Soybean 3x3
Blood Testing Patient 1 Patient 2 Patient 3 Patient 4
Absolute eosinophil count
Normal range 40–360 cells/μl
40 cells/μL 90 cells/μL 170 cells/μL 80 cells/μL
Serum total IgE
Normal range 0–90 IU/ml
5.6 IU/ml 21.9 IU/ml 72.3 IU/ml 11.1 IU/ml
Aeroallergen sIgE (14 tested) All <0.35 kU/ml All <0.35 kU/ml All <0.35 kU/ml All <0.35 kU/ml
Food allergen sIgE (8 tested) All <0.35 kU/ml All <0.35 kU/ml All <0.35 kU/ml All <0.35 kU/ml

We next sought to characterize the cytokine production by circulating peripheral blood T lymphocytes from these patients. Analysis of cytokine production by CD3+CD4+CD27CD45RO+ effector memory T cells following stimulation with PMA/ionomycin demonstrated a trend towards an increased frequency of IFN-γ producing cells and a trend towards a decreased frequency of IL-4 and IL-13 producing cells in patients (GATA3+/−) compared to healthy controls (GATA3wt), although there was wide variability and this did not reach statistical significance (Fig 1). As previous reports have suggested a Th1 bias with a concomitant impairment in Th2 cytokine production[1], we next sought to determine if there was a defect in Th2 differentiation. Naïve CD4+ lymphocytes were subject to Th0 or Th2 skewing conditions. Although induction of GATA3+ cells was seen in both groups under Th2 skewing conditions, the fold-induction in GATA3 was greater in healthy controls (GATA3wt) than in patients (GATA3+/−) (Fig 2a,b), suggesting that T lymphocytes from GATA3 haploinsufficient patients were more resistant to Th2 priming than controls.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Results of a six-hour stimulation of PBMCs with PMA and ionomycin in the presence of brefeldin A, followed by fixation, permeabilization and staining for intracellular cytokines. Data shown represent mean of 3 independent experiments for GATA3+/− patients; included for comparison are age and sex matched healthy controls.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

CD4+ naïve T cells were subject to Th0 (anti-CD3/CD28 and IL-2) or Th2 (anti-CD3/CD28, IL-2, IL-4, anti-IFN-γ, anti-IL-10) skewing conditions prior to staining for expression of TBET and GATA3. n=3–5 independent experiments. (a) Geometric mean fluorescent intensity (MFI) of GATA3 under Th0 and Th2 conditions (representative data). (b) Fold increase of GATA3 MFI under Th2 conditions compared to Th0 conditions.

It is now well established that GATA3 is the major transcription factor that drives Th2 differentiation. Loss of one functional GATA3 allele (GATA3 haploinsufficiency) in humans leads to significant embryonic consequences and is the cause of the HDR syndrome characterized by hypoparathyroidism, sensorineural hearing loss, and renal anomalies [6]. We report four adult patients with HDR syndrome, two with novel missense mutations. Prior work has demonstrated in vitro Th1 skewing with a modest concomitant impairment in the Th2 compartment in patients with HDR syndrome [1]. We confirm a modest Th1 bias and Th2 defect in vitro. However, the potential clinical consequences of this Th1/Th2 imbalance have not previously been investigated. One patient in our cohort reported significant atopic disease including allergic rhinitis, food allergy and eczema, suggesting that the in vitro Th1 skewing does not inhibit the ability to produce a Th2-mediated allergic response in vivo. Interestingly, we noted discordance between skin prick and serum allergy testing results. None of our patients had an elevated serum total IgE or detectable specific IgE to a panel of common environmental and food allergens, while all four patients had sensitization to at least one allergen as identified by skin prick test. Although discordance between serum allergen specific IgE and skin prick test results has been described in large population studies [9], it is possible that a reduction in GATA3-driven IL-4 production leads to impairment of detectable serum antigen specific IgE while preserving the capacity for skin prick and clinical sensitization. This could be explored using larger cohorts of patients with HDR syndrome, as well as in atopic controls in whom discordance between skin and serum testing has been observed. Furthermore, modest Th1 skewing appears to be held in check without evidence of clinical autoimmunity. These data suggest that while the impact of GATA3 during embryogenesis on certain targets is highly dose-dependent, CD4+ T lymphocyte development and function and Th2 responses are largely insensitive to GATA3 haploinsufficiency and allow clinical allergic disease.

METHODS

Human subjects and clinical studies

All studies involving human subjects were performed in accordance with National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Institutional Review Board–approved protocols 10-I-0148 and 00-I-0159 and the National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Institutional Review Board–approved protocol 01-D-0184, as well as the guidelines in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments. All patients gave informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study. Allergic, infectious, and autoimmune histories, immunologic phenotyping, allergen skin prick testing (SPT), serum total and allergen specific IgE level, peripheral absolute eosinophil counts, and routine biochemistries were measured in four patients with a clinical history of HDR syndrome. A renal ultrasound and assessment of the auditory and vestibular systems were also performed. In each patient, a mutation in GATA3 was identified by Sanger sequencing. Controls are age- and sex-matched healthy volunteers.

Skin prick testing (SPT)

SPT to a panel of 7 food [cashew nut, egg white, cow’s milk, peanut, shrimp, soybean, wheat] and 13 aeroallergen [Alternaria alternata (tenuis), Aspergillus fumigatus, birch mix (black/sweet, red/river, white), black walnut tree, cat hair, cockroach mix (German, American), Dermatophagoides farinae, Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus, dog dander, mouse epithelium, oak mix (black, red, white), ragweed mix (giant, short/common), timothy grass] extracts (United States Army Centralized Allergen Extract Laboratory, Bethesda MD) was performed on the forearm with a Greer Pick (Greer Laboratories, Lenoir NC). Positive histamine and negative diluent controls were used. Reactions were recorded at 15 minutes. A wheal of 3 mm greater than the negative control was considered positive.

ImmunoCAP assay

Sera were analyzed for allergen-specific IgE (sIgE) antibodies to a panel of 8 food and 16 aero-allergens; allergens matched those used for SPT with the addition of walnut, cat epithelium, Cladosporium herbarum, and lambs quarter. Analysis was performed by a commercial laboratory (Mayo Medical Laboratories, Rochester MN) or by using the Phadia ImmunoCAP System (Phadia AB, Uppsala, Sweden) as detailed by the manufacturer. Values of 0.35 kU/L or more were considered positive.

T cell differentiation

PBMCs were isolated by Ficoll-Hypaque density centrifugation and resuspended in R10 medium (RPMI 1640 supplemented with 100 U/mL of penicillin, 100 μg/mL of streptomycin, 29.2 μg/mL of l-glutamine (all GIBCO, Carlsbad CA) and 10% heat-inactivated FCS (Gemini Bio-Products, Sacramento CA)). Naïve CD4+ T cells were isolated from PBMCs using negative selection MACS microbeads (Miltenyi Biotec, San Diego CA) as per manufacturer’s protocol. Purity was >90% in all samples run. Cells were stimulated in 96 well round-bottom plates at 50,000 cells per well that had been coated with 1 μg/ml anti-CD3 (OKT3 clone). Th2 cultures were performed in X-VIVO 15 medium (Lonza, Basel, Switzerland) in the presence of IL-4 (12.5ng/ml), anti-IFN-γ (10μg/ml), anti-IL-10 (10μg/ml), anti-CD28 (1μg/ml) and IL-2 (10 IU/ml) for 5.5 days. Th0 cell cultures were performed without skewing cytokines.

Flow cytometry

For transcription factor analysis following in vitro differentiation, cells were washed and surface stained with Live/Dead Fixable Aqua viability dye (Invitrogen, Carlsbad CA), fixed and permeabilized with the Foxp3 staining kit and stained for CD4 FITC, Gata3 AF-647 (both BD Biosciences, San Jose CA), and Tbet PE (eBioscience, San Diego CA).

For ex vivo CD4+ memory T cell cytokine analysis, PBMCs were examined after stimulation for 6 hours with 20 ng/mL of phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) and 1 μM of ionomycin in the presence of 10 μg/mL of brefeldin-A for the last 4 hours. Cells were surface stained with Live/Dead Fixable Aqua viability dye, CD3 AF-700, CD4 PE-Cy7, CD8 APC-H7 (all BD Biosciences, San Jose CA), CD27 PE-Cy5 and CD45RO Texas Red PE (Beckman Coulter, Brea CA), fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, permeabilized with a saponin-based buffer, and stained intracellularly for IFN-γ FITC, IL-17 PE, and IL-22 APC or IL-2 FITC, IL-4 PE and IL-13 APC. Events were collected on an LSRFortessa (BD Biosciences) and analyzed with FlowJo 9.7.5 (Treestar, Ashland OR). All plots are gated on live, singlet, CD3+CD4+ lymphocytes.

Statistical analysis

Results are reported as means ± SEMs, unless otherwise stated. Differences between groups were assessed using the paired t-test or the Mann-Whitney test (Graph Pad Prism; Graph Pad Software, San Diego CA). The statistical significance level adopted was a P value of less than 0.05.

Supplementary Material

Acknowledgments

We are very grateful to the patients for their participation in this study. This research was supported [in part] by the Intramural Research Programs of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), the National Institute on Deafness and other Communication Disorders, and the National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research. Author Nina Jones is additionally funded by this statement: This project has been funded in whole or in part with federal funds from the National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, under Contract No. HHSN261200800001E.

Footnotes

The content of this publication does not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Department of Health and Human Services, nor does mention of trade names, commercial products, or organizations imply endorsement by the United States Government.

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  • 1.Skapenko A, Leipe J, Niesner U, Devriendt K, Beetz R, Radbruch A, et al. GATA-3 in human T cell helper type 2 development. The Journal of experimental medicine. 2004;199(3):423–8. doi: 10.1084/jem.20031323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Debacker C, Catala M, Labastie MC. Embryonic expression of the human GATA-3 gene. Mechanisms of development. 1999;85(1–2):183–7. doi: 10.1016/s0925-4773(99)00088-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Pandolfi PP, Roth ME, Karis A, Leonard MW, Dzierzak E, Grosveld FG, et al. Targeted disruption of the GATA3 gene causes severe abnormalities in the nervous system and in fetal liver haematopoiesis. Nat Genet. 1995;11(1):40–4. doi: 10.1038/ng0995-40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ting CN, Olson MC, Barton KP, Leiden JM. Transcription factor GATA-3 is required for development of the T-cell lineage. Nature. 1996;384(6608):474–8. doi: 10.1038/384474a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Zhu J, Min B, Hu-Li J, Watson CJ, Grinberg A, Wang Q, et al. Conditional deletion of Gata3 shows its essential function in T(H)1-T(H)2 responses. Nature immunology. 2004;5(11):1157–65. doi: 10.1038/ni1128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Van Esch H, Groenen P, Nesbit MA, Schuffenhauer S, Lichtner P, Vanderlinden G, et al. GATA3 haploinsufficiency causes human HDR syndrome. Nature. 2000;406(6794):419–22. doi: 10.1038/35019088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Muroya K, Hasegawa T, Ito Y, Nagai T, Isotani H, Iwata Y, et al. GATA3 abnormalities and the phenotypic spectrum of HDR syndrome. Journal of medical genetics. 2001;38(6):374–80. doi: 10.1136/jmg.38.6.374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ali A, Christie PT, Grigorieva IV, Harding B, Van Esch H, Ahmed SF, et al. Functional characterization of GATA3 mutations causing the hypoparathyroidism-deafness-renal (HDR) dysplasia syndrome: insight into mechanisms of DNA binding by the GATA3 transcription factor. Human molecular genetics. 2007;16(3):265–75. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddl454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.de Vos G. Skin testing versus serum-specific IgE testing: which is better for diagnosing aeroallergen sensitization and predicting clinical allergy? Current allergy and asthma reports. 2014;14(5):430. doi: 10.1007/s11882-014-0430-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

RESOURCES