SUMMARY
The inherited bone marrow failure syndromes (IBMFS) are a rare yet clinically important cause of neonatal hematological and non-hematological manifestations. Many of these syndromes, such as Fanconi anemia, dyskeratosis congenita and Diamond–Blackfan anemia, confer risks of multiple medical complications later in life, including an increased risk of cancer. Some IBMFS may present with cytopenias in the neonatal period whereas others may present only with congenital physical abnormalities and progress to pancytopenia later in life. A thorough family history and detailed physical examination are integral to the work-up of any neonate in whom there is a high index of suspicion for an IBMFS. Correct detection and diagnosis of these disorders is important for appropriate long-term medical surveillance and counseling not only for the patient but also for appropriate genetic counselling of their families regarding recurrence risks in future children and generations.
Keywords: Neonate, Cytopenia, Cancer, Bone marrow failure, Fanconi anemia, Dyskeratosis congenita
1. Introduction
The inherited bone marrow failure syndromes (IBMFS) are a group of biologically distinct yet clinically related cancer-prone syndromes that may present with significant cytopenias in at least one hematopoietic cell lineage. Some of these disorders may present with hematologic manifestations in the neonatal period, such as thrombocytopenia absent radii (TAR) syndrome or severe congenital neutropenia (SCN), whereas other IBMFS, including Fanconi anemia (FA) and dyskeratosis congenita (DC), rarely manifest with neonatal-onset cytopenias but may present with congenital abnormalities or dysmorphic features [1]. The differential diagnosis of neonatal cytopenias is complex and includes physiologic or iatrogenic causes, congenital or acquired infection, non-IBMFS genetic diseases, as well as maternal causes such as pregnancy-induced hypertension/pre-eclampsia. Early diagnosis of an IBMFS is important to optimize clinical management, anticipate possible complications that may develop later in life, and provide appropriate genetic counseling for the family. Many of these syndromes require multi-disciplinary, multi-specialty medical care for appropriate surveillance and management. In this review, we discuss the most prevalenty IBMFS, possible neonatal presentations, current understanding of underlying molecular basis for disease, and medical problems associated with each syndrome that may present later in life.
1.1. General evaluation of IBMFS in neonates
The evaluation of any neonate for an underlying IBMFS should include a thorough family history for presence of hematologic and non-hematologic problems in the family (such as cancer or pulmonary fibrosis for DC, or anemia for DBA), a complete physical exam with a specific focus on evaluation for dysmorphic features, a complete blood count with differential, reticulocyte count, and peripheral blood smear for evidence of hematologic disease. Many of the IBMFS are associated with elevated fetal hemoglobin (HbF) and elevated mean corpuscular volume (MCV). HbF and the MCV are postulated to be markers of stress erythropoiesis in older patients, but these parameters are not necessarily useful in the neonatal evaluation due to normally elevated levels in the first few months of life. Surrogate peripheral markers for decreased erythrocyte and platelet production in the marrow include a low reticulocyte count for age and a low immature platelet fraction, respectively [1]. A bone marrow aspirate and biopsy may be required to aid in diagnosis. Specific diagnostics are further discussed under each syndrome.
2. Fanconi anemia
2.1. Clinical features
Fanconi anemia is a chromosomal instability disorder caused by genetic defects in DNA repair. Bone marrow failure (BMF) in FA is rarely present in infancy. Many patients with FA have congenital anomalies that may affect almost any organ system (Table 1). The most prevalent congenital anomalies are short stature in about 40% of patients, skin abnormalities such as café-au-lait and hyper- or hypopigmented spots in about 40%, upper limb abnormalities in 35% including absent, hypoplastic, bifid, duplicated or rudimentary thumb, absent or hypoplastic radius (with abnormal thumbs), flat thenar eminence, clinodactyly or polydactyly [2,3]. Other frequent anomalies in about 20–25% of patients include microcephaly, facial features such as triangular “Fanconi” face, micrognathia, mid-face hypoplasia and epicanthal folds; renal anomalies such as horseshoe kidney, ectopic or pelvic kidney, absent kidney and hypogonadism. Physical features of FA may overlap significantly with those of the VACTERL-H association; VACTERL-H is the acronym for vertebral anomalies, anal atresia, cardiac anomalies, trachea–esophageal fistula, esophageal atresia or duodenal atresia, renal structural anomalies, limb abnormalities – particularly radii and thumbs and hydrocephalus [4]. It has been suggested that 5–10% of babies reported to have VACTERL-H may indeed have FA, with FA VACETRL babies having renal abnormalities, radial ray defects and cardiac anomalies more frequently than classic VACTERL [4]. FA patients with VACTERL may have worse prognosis with shorter median survival and earlier onset of malignancy compared with other FA patients [4]. FA testing should be considered in neonates with VACTERL-H. It is important to note that up to two-thirds of patients do not present with the physical features of FA and may initially present with later complications such as bone marrow failure or cancer [5,6]. A physically normal-appearing baby does not rule out the disease, especially in a family with known history of FA.
Table 1.
Selected clinical manifestations of IBMFS in the neonate.
| Neonatal manifestations | FA | DC | DBA | SDS | TAR | CAMT | SCN |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hematological | Very rare, cytopenia | Very rare, cytopenia | Macrocytic, normochromic anemia with reticulocytopenia | Neutropenia | Thrombocytopenia | Thrombocytopenia | Neutropenia |
| General | LBW. VACTERL-H | LBW. IUGR (HH and RS) | LBW | ||||
| Skeletal | Absent or hypoplastic thumbs or radii, flat thenar eminence. Toe syndactyly, foot malformations Sprengel deformity, Klippel–Fiel anomaly, spina bifida, hemivertebrae, abnormal ribs, coccygeal aplasia | Webbed or short neck, Klippel-Feil anomaly, Sprengel deformity. Absent radial artery, flat thenar eminence. Triphalangeal, duplex, bifid, hypoplastic, or absent thumb | Metaphyseal dysostosis, epiphyseal dysplasia, abnormal ribs | Bilaterally absent radii with thumbs present, hypoplasia or absence of ulnae or humeri. Non-specific bony abnormalities | Valgus and varus deformities, vertebral anomalies | ||
| Dermatological | Café au lait spots | Dysplastic nails | |||||
| Craniofacial | Microcephaly. Triangular bird-like facies, small eyes | Microcephaly. Exudative retinopathy (RS) | Microcephaly, hypertelorism. Broad, flat nasal bridge, microtia, cleft lip/palate, high arched palate, micrognathia, low anterior hairline, congenital glaucoma or cataract | Hearing loss | Cleft and high arched palate, optic atrophy, coloboma | ||
| CNS | Cerebellar hypoplasia (HH), intracranial calcifications (RS) | Chiari type I malformation, cerebellar tonsil ectopia, hypotonia | |||||
| Cardiac | As part of VACTERL-H | VSD, ASD, coarctation of the aorta | VSD, ASD, PDA | VSD, ASD | VSD, ASD | ||
| Gastrointestinal | As part of VACTERL-H | Esophageal stenosis | Exocrine pancreatic insufficiency. Hepatomegaly with abnormal serum transaminases. Malrotation, inguinal hernia, imperforate anus | ||||
| Renal | Structural renal anomalies | Structural renal anomalies | Structural renal anomalies | Structural renal anomalies | |||
| Genitourinary | Males, hypospadias, micropenis; undescended or absent testes. Females, bicornuate uterus, small ovaries. Both sexes, hydronephrosis or hydroureter | Urethral stenosis in males. Hypogonadism | Hypospadias | Hypogonadism | Rarely agenesis of uterus, cervix, upper vagina | ||
| Immune | Immunodeficiency (HH) | Infection due to neutropenia | Infection due to neutropenia |
FA, Fanconi anemia; DC, dyskeratosis congenita; DBA, Diamond-Blackfan anemia; SDS, Shwachman-Diamond syndrome; TAR, thrombocytopenia absent radii; CAMT, congenital amegakaryocytic thrombocytopenia; SCN, severe congenital neutropenia; LBW, low birth weight;VACTERL-H, vertebral anomalies, anal atresia, cardiac anomalies, tracheo-esophageal fistula, esophaeal or duodenal atresia, renal structural anomalies, limb anomalies, hydrocephalus; IUGR, intrauterine growth retardation; HH, Hoyeraal-Hreidarrson syndrome; RS, Revesz syndrome; VSD, ventricular septal defect; ASD, atrial septal defect; PDA, patent ductus arteriosus.
Bone marrow failure in FA may present at any age and has been reported in neonates but occurs most frequently in the first decade of life. It may present as a single cytopenia or pancytopenia [3,7,8]. FA is a cancer-prone IBMFS with increased risk of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), acute myeloid leukemia (AML), and solid tumors, particularly squamous cell carcinoma of the head, neck, gastrointestinal (GI) tract, skin, and genitourinary tract. Competing risk analyses have shown the cumulative incidence of AML to be 10% by age 24 years, and that of solid tumors to be 29% by age 48 years [9]. Patients with mutations in FANCD1/BRCA2 have a very high risk for developing brain tumors, AML or Wilm's tumor at an early age [10].
2.2. Pathogenesis, genetics, and diagnosis
Fanconi anemia is caused by germline mutations in DNA repair genes. Inheritance is autosomal recessive (AR), except FA subtype B, which is X-linked recessive (XLR). Whereas the first genetic mutation causing FA was discovered more than 20 years ago, recent advances in genomic technology, including next generation sequencing and whole exome analysis, have accelerated gene discovery efforts. There are currently 16 known genes causative of FA, which account for ~95% of FA patients [5] (Table 2).
Table 2.
Molecular mechanisms, known genes, and modes of inheritance of inherited bone marrow failure syndromes.
| Biological pathway | Gene(s) | Inheritance | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fanconi anemia | DNA repair | FANCA, FANCC, FANCD1/BRCA2, FANCD2, FANCE, FANCF, FANCG/XRCC9, FANCI, FANCJ/BA CH1/BRIP1, FANCL, FANCM, FANCN/PALB2, FANCO/RAD51C, FANCP/SLX4, FANCQ (ERCC4) | AR |
| FANCB | XLR | ||
| Dyskeratosis congenita | Telomere biology | NOP10, NHP2, WRAP53, RTEL1, TERT, CTC1, ACD, PARN | AR |
| TERT, TERC, TINF2, RTEL1 | AD | ||
| DKC1 | XLR | ||
| Diamond-Blackfan anemia | Ribosomal biogenesis | RPS19, RPS17, RPS24, RPL35A, RPL5, RPL11RPS7, RPL26, RPS26, RPS10, RPS29 | AD |
| GATA1 | XLR | ||
| Shwachman-Diamond syndrome | Ribosomal RNA processing | SBDS | AR |
| Thrombocytopenia absent radii | Not yet elucidated | 1q21.1 deletion and RBM8A | AR |
| Congenital amegakaryocytic thrombocytopenia | Reduced or non-functional thrombopoietin receptor | MPL | AR |
| Severe congenital neutropenia | Maturational arrest of neutrophil development | ELANE (ELA2) | AD |
| HAX1, G6PC3, GSI1, JAGN1 | AR |
AR, autosomal recessive; AD, autosomal dominant; XLR, X-linked recessive.
The diagnosis of FA in neonates requires a thorough physical examination with a detailed dysmorphology exam. Prenatal ultrasound may be helpful in identifying pathognomonic physical features of FA, including thumb abnormalities or VACTERL features.
Fanconi anemia is diagnosed by the presence of elevated chromosomal breakage in lymphocytes after exposure to a DNA cross-linking agent such as di-epoxybutane or mitomycin C [2,11]. In 10–30% of FA patients, this test may be inconclusive due to somatic mosaicism, which occurs when there are two populations of lymphocytes in a patient's blood – one with increased sensitivity to DNA cross-linking agents and another with normal sensitivity. In patients with negative or inconclusive chromosomal breakage of lymphocytes, skin fibroblasts should be tested for chromosome breakage as these cells are not known to be affected by mosaicism [2,12].
2.3. Management
The management of infants with FA requires a multi-disciplinary team approach that adapts to the patient's changing needs. The Fanconi Anemia Research Fund publishes clinical care guidelines focused on all FA-associated medical problems [13]. Surgery is often required for life-threatening congenital anomalies, such as congenital heart disease or anal atresia. Absent thumbs are often surgically corrected with pollicization to create a functional thumb from an existing finger [13,14].
Hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) is currently the only curative treatment for the hematological manifestations of FA; however, this does not diminish the increased risk of malignancy – indeed, the risk of solid tumors after successful HCT has been shown to be further increased [15,16]. Due to their exquisite sensitivity to DNA-damaging agents, non-myeloablative HCT may be indicated in FA patients with severe BMF in the absence of malignancy, and survival rates have been reported to be better in patients who underwent HCT from a related donor [17]. In patients who choose not to or who are unable to undergo HCT, androgens such as oxymetholone have been successful in treating BMF in about 50% patients [2]. Patients on androgens must undergo regular testing for blood counts, lipid panel testing, liver function tests, and abdominal ultrasound to monitor for liver tumors. Treatment of malignancies is particularly challenging due to sensitivity to chemotherapy and radiation, making surgery the mainstay of treatment for solid tumors in FA [3].
3. Dyskeratosis congenita
3.1. Clinical features
The mucocutaneous triad of lacy skin pigmentation, oral leukoplakia, and nail dystrophy is diagnostic of DC. It is typically not present in the neonatal period but, instead, develops at different rates in different patients [18]. Patients with DC rarely develop hematological manifestations as infants. The neonatal presentation of DC is non-specific but may include low birth weight, urethral stenosis, hypoplastic gonads, blocked lacrimal ducts, and esophageal stenosis [1,19,20] (Table 1). Hoyeraal–Hreidarsson syndrome (HH) and Revesz syndrome (RS) are clinical variants of DC with complications that may be present in neonates or in early infancy. Patients with HH have cerebellar hypoplasia, intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR), developmental delay, immunodeficiency, and non-specific enteropathy. The immunodeficiency in HH is non-specific and may be clinically significant in infancy. Revesz syndrome (RS), another variant of DC, presents with IUGR, intracranial calcifications, and bilateral exudative retinopathy in addition to features of DC [3,19]. Patients with ‘Coats plus syndrome’, a related telomere biology disorder, develop vascular ectasias in the eye, GI tract, and lungs, in addition to intracranial calcifications.
DC patients are at high risk of developing BMF at varying ages, with cumulative incidence of 50% by the age of 50 years across all genotypes [20,21]. BMF in HH usually develops in early childhood [19]. DC patients are also at high risk of developing pulmonary fibrosis, non-alcoholic liver disease/cirrhosis, avascular necrosis of femoral head and osteoporosis, among other problems such as premature loss or graying of hair and dental problems [1,19,22]. DC is a cancer-predisposition syndrome with increased risk of cancers similar to those in FA, namely squamous cell carcinoma of head, neck, anogenital regions; and MDS/leukemia. It confers an 1100-fold increased risk of tongue cancer and 2500-fold increased risk for MDS [9,23].
3.2. Pathogenesis, genetics, and diagnosis
The central component in the molecular pathogenesis of DC is defective telomere biology. Inheritance is complex and can be AR, XLR, autosomal dominant (AD), or due to denovo mutations [19]. There are currently eleven known genetic causes of DC, all of which are genes involved in telomere lengthening, or protection. Together they account for disease in ~70% DC patients (Table 2) [5,24,25]. The carrier frequency of specific mutations may be higher in founder populations such as mutations in RTEL1 in Askenazi Jewish individuals [26].
The clinical diagnosis of DC, in the absence of the classic triad, is challenging given its phenotypic heterogeneity. Telomere length <1st percentile for age in lymphocyte subsets measured by flow cytometry with fluorescence in-situ hybridization is a highly sensitive and specific diagnostic test [27,28].
3.3. Management
Patients with DC may have multiple, difficult-to-diagnose medical problems. Esophageal or urethral stenosis may require dilation. Lacrimal duct stenosis has been managed with stents. Exudative retinopathy in RS requires pediatric consultation with retinal specialists.
BMF in DC does not respond to immunosuppressive therapy. Between 50% and 70% of patients with BMF show a response to androgen treatment, but co-treatment with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) must be avoided due to the risk of splenic peliosis [29]. Patients on androgens for BMF were reported to have increased occurrence of lipid panel abnormalities and liver tumors compared with those who were not [21,29]. HCT with a non-myeloablative conditioning regimen is curative for the non-malignant hematologic manifestations of DC. However, HCT-associated chemotherapy and immunosuppressive medications may further compound the risk of pulmonary fibrosis, liver disease and veno-occlusive disease. Late graft failure is another complication seen in post-HCT DC [3,30].
4. Diamond–Blackfan anemia
4.1. Clinical features
Diamond–Blackfan anemia (DBA) frequently presents with isolated anemia due to pure red blod cell (RBC) aplasia in the neonatal period or infancy [1,31]. Congenital anomalies have been reported in 40–50% patients (Table 1) [1,32]. Craniofacial dysmorphism includes widely separated eyes, ‘snub’ nose, thick upperlip, and rarely cleft lip/palate; upper limb deformities include triphalangeal, bifid or subluxed thumbs with subtle thenar eminence flattening and normal radius [33]. The thumb abnormalities are important to differentiate from FA. Other reported congenital anomalies include genitourinary defects, cardiac abnormalities, webbed neck, Klippel–Feil anomaly (fusion of cervical vertebrae), and Sprengel deformity (congenital asymmetric high scapula) [1,5,31,34]. Growth retardation is seen in about 30% of neonates with DBA [32]. There is a broad phenotypic spectrum even within families with DBA, the molecular basis of which is not clearly understood, with some mutation-positive members being clinically unaffected and some with severe anemia requiring treatment [35].
Anemia in DBA may occasionally lead to aplastic anemia, though not typically as severe as that of FA or DC [3]. Patients with DBA are also at a 5-fold increased risk of developing cancer compared to the general population, with highest risk observed for MDS, followed by colon carcinoma, osteosarcoma, AML and genitourinary cancers [36].
4.2. Pathogenesis, genetics, and diagnosis
DBA is caused by AD mutations in key components of the small or large ribosomal subunits (Table 2) [5]. RPS19, the first known gene to cause DBA, was discovered more than 15 years ago and accounts for about 25% of DBA patients. Since then mutations in 13 ribosomal genes have been identified in many patients. However, approximately half of DBA patients still have an unknown genetic cause [5,37]. X-linked mutations in GATA1 were found in two families with DBA, expanding the understanding of the disease outside the ribosomal pathways and linking it to X-linked dyserythropoietic anemia and thrombocytopenia [5,38,39].
It is not clear why these mutations affect erythropoietic development specifically. It is speculated that defective ribosomal protein function may result in activation of cellular stress-signaling pathways such as p53 [40].
The classic anemia diagnostic of DBA is isolated normochromic macrocytic anemia with reticulocytopenia occurring in the first year of life, with normal or increased platelet counts, and decreased erythroid precursors in the bone marrow [32,41]. With the heterogeneity of disease, diagnosis may not be as straightforward. Elevated levels of HbF, erythropoietin and erythrocyte adenosine deaminase (eADA) are supporting criteria for diagnosis, but their absence does not rule out the diagnosis of DBA. A recent study showed that whereas elevated eADA has good predictive value, up to 16% of DBA patients have a normal eADA [32,42]. Markers such as eADA and erythropoietin may be helpful in distinguishing DBA from transient erythroblastopenia of childhood, which may present at an overlapping age as DBA (although typically after one year of age) and usually remits spontaneously [1,3].
4.3. Management
Anemia is the major clinical complication in children with DBA. RBC transfusions are the mainstay of treatment until the diagnosis of DBA has been established. Corticosteroid therapy is a viable treatment option in older children and has shown response rates of up to 80% of treated DBA patients. However, caution must be exercised and regular surveillance performed for steroid-related complications such as diabetes mellitus, infections, and growth retardation [3,32]. Transfusions may be continued in patients who are medically unable to take, tolerate or are unresponsive to steroids. The most prevalent secondary and potentially life-threatening complication of chronic RBC transfusions is iron overload of the liver, heart, and endocrine organs. Iron chelation is recommended after 10–15 transfusions and compliance is of utmost importance in preventing free iron build-up in the body. Studies have shown that ferritin correlates poorly with amount of solid organ overload, and magnetic resonance R2/T2* imaging is now recommended to evaluate solid organ iron load and damage [3,41,43]. HCT may be considered for patients with treatment for steroid-unresponsive anemia but is a difficult decision to make in a disease that typically presents with a single cytopenia. Furthermore, 20–25% of affected DBA patients undergo spontaneous remission at no specific age. These patients may, however, relapse with anemia requiring treatment again [3,41].
5. Shwachman–Diamond syndrome
5.1. Clinical features
Shwachman–Diamond syndrome (SDS) usually presents with a single cytopenia – neutropenia – that may progress to BMF. SDS is characterized by exocrine pancreatic insufficiency leading to malabsorption and steatorrhea in the first few months of life, in addition to growth retardation and bone marrow dysfunction [1,3]. In a small series of SDS patients, the skeletal phenotype in infancy has been characterized to include delayed appearance of secondary ossification centers, metaphyseal widening and dysotosis, osteopenia, and wormian bones of the skull (Table 1) [44].
Patients with SDS develop infantile growth retardation, frequent bacterial infections secondary to intermittent severe neutropenia, and failure to thrive resulting from recurrent infections and malabsorption due to pancreatic dysfunction. It is second to only cystic fibrosis in leading causes of inherited pancreatic dysfunction [45]. The hematological features of SDS vary but typically intermittent severe neutropenia with absolute counts <0.5×109/L is the initial finding and may be followed by bilineage or trilineage cytopenia in ~20% patients [3].
5.2. Pathogenesis, genetics, and diagnosis
Shwachman–Diamond syndrome is inherited in an AR fashion, with germline mutations in the SBDS gene being the only known diseasing-causing gene and accounting for about 95% of patients (Table 2). The SBDS protein interacts with the 60S ribosomal precursor and moves between the nucleus and cytoplasm of the cell based on the cell cycle [46,47]. The involvement of multiple organ systems including skeletal system, hematopoietic system and exocrine pancreas may be due to the biological link between SBDS and ribosome biology [1].
The diagnosis of SDS is made based on clinical phenotype with involvement of the exocrine pancreas, skeletal abnormalities, and bone marrow dysfunction. An update on 37 SDS patients in the North American SDS registry reported a wide phenotypic spectrum with only about half the patients having the classic phenotypic criteria. Notably, about 65% of patients had congenital abnormalities, as described above [45,48]. Genetic testing for mutations in the SBDS gene is diagnostic of the majority of patients despite heterogeneity of clinical presentation. Exocrine pancreatic insufficiency may be evidenced by low levels of serum trypsinogen in children aged <3 years, low serum isoamylase levels in children aged >3 years, or elevated fecal fat excretion over a 72 h period. However, normal values of any of these do not preclude diagnosis [49]. Bone marrow clonality has been known to occur in SDS, with the most common molecular changes being abnormalities in i(7q) and del(20q) [48]. SDS patients also have hepatomegaly with or without elevation of serum transaminases, and these may also resolve with age [45].
5.3. Management
Clinical management of SDS is based on the affected organ systems and requires multidisciplinary team coordination with hematology, gastroenterology, and immunology. G-CSF is used to treat patients with severe and recurrent infections and/or severe neutropenia, along with appropriate antimicrobial treatment. There has been no strong evidence to suggest malignancies associated with G-CSF treatment in this cohort [50]. Pancreatic insufficiency is managed with supplementation of vitamins A, D, E, K, and with replacement of pancreatic enzymes which also aids in treating growth failure due to malabsorption [45]. SDS patients may be at increased risk of AML; however, data for association between SDS and MDS have been inconclusive. Bone marrow examination can aid in the diagnosis and evolution of clonal bone marrow disease [9,48]. Some SDS patients have cognitive/intellectual disabilities and thus neuropsychological evaluation may be a valuable component of long-term management [45]. Data on HCT are limited due to small numbers and reporting in small case series or reports. HCT may be indicated in patients with multiple severe cytopenias or with evidence of leukemia, although it has been suggested that SDS patients are at increased risk of transplant-related mortality [50]. Identifying patients at risk of MDS may be challenging due observations of persistent clonal bone marrow changes without malignant transformation. SDS patients have shown better results with reduced intensity conditioning regimens for transplant [45,50].
6. Thrombocytopenia absent radii
6.1. Clinical features
Patients with TAR are typically diagnosed in the neonatal period because of thrombocytopenia and absence of radii with presence of both thumbs (Table 1). Prenatal ultrasound may identify absent radii prior to birth. The radial absence is almost always bilateral (about 98% cases). The thumbs are present but may not appear normal. The presence of thumbs helps in differentiating TAR from FA; in FA the thumbs are absent and radii may or may not be present or deformed [1,51,52]. TAR-associated thrombocytopenia is often congenital or occurs in the first few months of life. In one review, ~60% affected babies developed thrombocytopenia in the first few weeks of life [53]. The thrombocytopenia is often severe in infancy and early childhood, with platelet counts <50×109/L, but it tends to improve over time, although not quite reaching normal levels. The risk of spontaneous hemorrhage also follows this pattern [51].
Other physical abnormalities in TAR have been reported such as ulnar and humeral deformities, rib and cervical anomalies, cardiac lesions (usually septal defects), GI and genitourinary abnormalities that are non-specific but known to occur [51,53]. Cow's milk allergy is highly prevalent in patients with TAR. Some patients develop a transient leukemoid reaction with white blood counts >35×109/L that can be misdiagnosed as congenital leukemia [52]. Whereas aplastic anemia or multilineage cytopenias do not frequently occur in TAR, there have been reports of leukemia in four patients [9,54,55].
6.2. Pathophysiology, genetics, and diagnosis
It is important to distinguish TAR from the other IBMFS such as FA since the clinical course and risks are very different. The pathophysiology and genetics of TAR were unknown until recently. A combination of comparative genomic hybridization and next generation sequencing revealed that TAR patients inherit a deletion of chromosome band 1q21.1 from one parent and a single nucleotide variant in the RBM8A gene in the non-deleted allele from the other parent, thus following AR pattern of inheritance (Table 2) [56,57]. The RBM8A gene encodes for a subunit of the exon-junction complex that is integral to RNA processing. It is expressed in hematopoietic lineages, thus suggesting that this is a plausible mechanism for the thrombocytopenia in TAR. Inheritance of two hypomorphic variants in RBM8A has also been reported to cause TAR [56,57].
Genetic testing for the 200 kb minimally deleted chromosomal band and RBM8A variant may aid in diagnosis [51]. Bone marrow examination in TAR shows small hypoplastic megakaryocytes with normal erythroid and myeloid lineages [51,52].
6.3. Management
Clinical management is based on presentation, with platelet transfusions as required for thrombocytopenia and orthopedic intervention for functional optimization of upper limbs. In patients with cow's milk allergy, consultation with a GI specialist and avoidance of dairy products may help decrease severity of gastroenteritis and prevent potential exacerbation of thrombocytopenia [51,58].
7. Congenital amegakaryocytic thrombocytopenia
7.1. Clinical features
Of all the IBMFS, congenital amegakaryocytic thrombocytopenia (CAMT) is the most likely to present at birth or in the neonatal period (Table 1). Approximately 70% of patients present with severe thrombocytopenia in the neonatal period [59]. CAMT is a rare cause of neonatal thrombocytopenia and other causes must be ruled out including prenatal causes, such as vertical transmission of toxoplasma, rubella, cytomegalovirus, herpes, and other infections such as syphilis, varicella, parvovirus B19 (TORCH) infections, and neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia [59,60]. Neonates with CAMT usually have severe thrombocytopenia with petechiae at birth and may develop intracranial or intestinal mucus membrane bleeding. The median platelet counts in these neonates have been reported as low as 16×109/L [59]. There are no characteristic congenital physical abnormalities associated with CAMT that differentiate it from other syndromes. Strabismus, cardiac defects, and intracranial abnormalities have been reported in patients with CAMT but may be coincidental [59,61]. Many children with CAMT develop pancytopenia. In some cases, multi-lineage cytopenias develop without the preceding thrombocytopenia. It has been suggested that patients with persistent severe thrombocytopenia in infancy, <50×109/L, develop pancytopenia at an earlier age (group I; median age at pancytopenia: 22 months) compared with those whose platelet counts rise after infancy (group II; median age at pancytopenia: 48 months) [61]. There are reports of MDS and leukemia [9,62], as well as of bone marrow trisomy 8 and monosomy 7 after the development of pancytopenia [59,63].
A rare form of CAMT associated with fusion of the radius and ulna (radio-ulnar synostosis) has been described. Typically these patients have mutations in HOXA11 that regulates megakaryocytic differentiation [1,64].
7.2. Pathogenesis, genetics, and diagnosis
The majority of CAMT patients have AR inherited biallelic mutations in MPL, the gene encoding the thrombopoietin receptor, an integral component of megakaryopoiesis (Table 2). These mutations have been divided into two groups. Group I CAMT has frameshift or nonsense mutations that cause more severe disease due to disruption or absence of TPO receptor function. Group II CAMT has missense MPL mutations that lead to reduced TPO receptor function and milder phenotypes [59,61]. Mouse models have shown that deletion in TPO or its receptor recapitulates the CAMT hematological phenotype and illustrates the role of MPL in hematopoiesis [1,60].
The diagnosis of CAMT may be made in newborns or infants with thrombocytopenia and/or hemorrhagic manifestations in absence of other causes, such as the lack of pathognomonic manifestations of other IBMFS, and morphologically normal platelets on peripheral smear. Genetic testing that finds mutation in MPL can be diagnostic of disease in cases of ambiguity [59]. If a bone marrow aspiration is performed, it may show absence or very low numbers of small-appearing megakaryocytes, with otherwise normal marrow cellularity unless done in presence of pancytopenia [60].
7.3. Management
Management of hematological manifestations is symptomatic, with platelet transfusions and antifibrinolytics for patients with bleeding caused by thrombocytopenia [60]. Currently the only curative treatment for CAMT and associated pancytopenia is HCT. Comparisons of patients with CAMT who have undergone HCT with standard chemotherapy conditioning versus those who have undergone HCT with reduced intensity conditioning have suggested higher rate of graft failure and transplant-related mortality in those who received standard chemotherapy. Outcomes have improved better with matched related donors, but further studies need to be carried out to characterize appropriate regimens [59,60,65].
8. Severe congenital neutropenia
8.1. Clinical features
Also known as Kostmann syndrome, severe congenital neutropenia (SCN) is a disease of severe neutropenia presenting in the neonatal period or early infancy, with neutrophil counts <0.5×109/L and recurrent bacterial infections such as skin and subcutaneous infections, abscesses, and pneumonia. Omphalitis is a typical neonatal presentation of SCN [1,52,66,67]. There are no other distinguishing physical features or congenital anomalies associated with SCN (Table 1). Hemoglobin levels and platelet counts are normal [68]. G-CSF is a mainstay of treatment of, or prophylaxis from, life-threatening bacterial infections. Patients with SCN were reported to be at increased risk of MDS and AML prior to the availability of G-CSF treatment and now G-CSF appears to add to that risk [69–72]. Notably, a prospective study on 374 patients on G-CSF treatment and overall risk of MDS/AML was 15–25% by age 15 years. The risk was reported to be higher with increasing doses of G-CSF and is postulated to be due to changes in the stem cell, not directly to G-CSF [73,74].
8.2. Pathogenesis, genetics, and diagnosis
Severe congenital neutropenia results from the maturational arrest of neutrophil development at or before the promyelocyte stage in the bone marrow (Table 2). Originally described by Kostmann with AR inheritance, genetic discovery has broadened the spectrum of SCN inheritance. Mutations in the neutrophil elastase gene ELA2 (ELANE) cause AD inherited and sporadic SCN in about 50% of patients. Elastase is a glycoprotein that is released from azurophilic granules during the promyelocyte–myelocyte maturation stage. There are two current hypotheses: (i) that ELA2 mutations cause accumulation of neutrophil elastase on the cytoplasm, leading to neutrophil apoptosis; and (ii) that ELA2 mutations cause amino-terminally deleted isoforms of the elastase rather than affecting the complete protein coding sequence [1,75–77]. AR inherited mutations in the mitochondrial gene HAX1 cause SCN, likely by activating the apoptotic cascade in myeloid cells [78]. Other mutations that have been reported to cause SCN include mutations in G6PC3, WAS, GSI1 and JAGN1 [78–81]. It has been seen that mutations in CSF3R that encodes G-CSF receptor are linked with leukemia progression in SCN [82].
The diagnosis of SCN is based upon the presence of recurrent bacterial infections and severe, persistent neutropenia. The differentiating factor between SCN and cyclic neutropenia (also caused by ELA2 mutations) is the persistence of neutropenia in SCN. Neutropenia waxes and wanes in cyclic neutropenia. Bone marrow aspiration in SCN, if performed, shows normocellular marrow with arrest of myeloid maturation [83].
8.3. Management
Clinical management of SCN is based on infectious manifestations due to profound neutropenia. It requires careful surveillance and early antimicrobial treatment for infections. G-CSF became available in the late 1980s for treatment of severe neutropenia to maintain levels that greatly reduced the risk of bacterial infections in the majority of patients [1,82,83]. However, as described, caution must be exercised in patients needing higher than usual doses of G-CSF due to risk of malignant transformation. HCT is the only curative treatment [1].
9. Conclusion
Whereas the above-described syndromes are considered the ‘classic’ IBMFS, there are several other disorders that may have hematological manifestations along with involvement of other organ systems or diagnostic constellations of symptoms such as Wiskott–Aldrich syndrome, Chediak–Higashi syndrome and Griscelli syndrome, among others that have not been discussed here. The importance of correctly diagnosing the IBMFS lies not only in the ability to differentiate future medical and oncological risk factors for each syndrome but also in proper genetic counseling and testing of family members. It is necessary for families to have a basic understanding of the disease inheritance and biological process to interpret and acknowledge risks for future children in the family and risks to first and second degree relatives based on inheritance patterns. Although the IBMFS remain a rare cause of hematologic abnormalities in neonates, they are without doubt a group of disorders that may cause a multitude of future morbidity, the knowledge of which allows for proper multi-disciplinary screening and appropriate treatment.
Practice points.
A high index of suspicion for IBMFS should be maintained in neonates with cytopenia and/or congenital abnormalities for proper diagnosis.
IBMFS may confer an increased risk of cancer.
Treatment of specific syndromes often requires multidisciplinary team coordination.
Genetic counseling is very important in families with IBMFS to aid in their understanding of disease etiology and risk to their children.
Research directions.
Optimizing early diagnosis of IBMFS through combining current approaches with next generation genomics.
Advancing understanding of genotype–phenotype correlations in IBMFS.
Optimize HCT conditioning regimens to improve clinical outcomes.
Increase understanding of biological mechanisms involved in IBMFS.
Identify the genetic causes of all IBMFS to improve patient diagnosis and understanding of underlying biology.
Acknowledgments
Funding sources
None.
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
Conflict of interest statement
None declared.
References
- 1.Rivers A, Slayton WB. Congenital cytopenias and bone marrow failure syndromes. Semin Perinatol. 2009;33:20–8. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2008.10.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Alter BP, Kupfer G. Fanconi anemia. In: Pagon RA, Adam MP, Bird TD, Dolan CR, Fong CT, Stephens K, editors. GeneReviews®. University of Washington, Seattle; Seattle: 1993. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Shimamura A, Alter BP. Pathophysiology and management of inherited bone marrow failure syndromes. Blood Rev. 2010;24:101–22. doi: 10.1016/j.blre.2010.03.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Alter BP, Rosenberg PS. VACTERL-H association and Fanconi anemia. Mol Syndromol. 2013;4:87–93. doi: 10.1159/000346035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Khincha PP, Savage SA. Genomic characterization of the inherited bone marrow failure syndromes. Semin Hematol. 2013;50:333–47. doi: 10.1053/j.seminhematol.2013.09.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Chung NG, Kim M. Current insights into inherited bone marrow failure syndromes. Korean J Pediatr. 2014;57:337–44. doi: 10.3345/kjp.2014.57.8.337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Landmann E, Bluetters-Sawatzki R, Schindler D, Gortner L. Fanconi anemia in a neonate with pancytopenia. J Pediatr. 2004;145:125–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2004.03.058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Dokal I, Vulliamy T. Inherited bone marrow failure syndromes. Haematologica. 2010;95:1236–40. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2010.025619. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Alter BP, Giri N, Savage SA, et al. Malignancies and survival patterns in the National Cancer Institute inherited bone marrow failure syndromes cohort study. Br J Haematol. 2010;150:179–88. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2010.08212.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Alter BP, Rosenberg PS, Brody LC. Clinical and molecular features associated with biallelic mutations in FANCD1/BRCA2. J Med Genet. 2007;44:1–9. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2006.043257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Auerbach AD, Rogatko A, Schroeder-Kurth TM. International Fanconi Anemia Registry: relation of clinical symptoms to diepoxybutane sensitivity. Blood. 1989;73:391–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Gross M, Hanenberg H, Lobitz S, et al. Reverse mosaicism in Fanconi anemia: natural gene therapy via molecular self-correction. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2002;98:126–35. doi: 10.1159/000069805. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Shimamura A. Treatment of hematologic abnormalities in FA. In: Eiler ME, Frohnmayer D, Frohnmayer L, Larsen K, Owen J, editors. Fanconi anemia: guidelines for diagnosis and management. Fanconi Anemia Research Fund, Inc.; Oregon: 2008. p. 53. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kozin SH. Pollicization: the concept, technical details, and outcome. Clin Orthop surg. 2012;4:18–35. doi: 10.4055/cios.2012.4.1.18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Rosenberg PS, Alter BP, Socie G, Gluckman E. Secular trends in outcomes for Fanconi anemia patients who receive transplants: implications for future studies. Biol Blood Marrow Transpl. 2005;11:672–9. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2005.05.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Rosenberg PS, Socie G, Alter BP, Gluckman E. Risk of head and neck squamous cell cancer and death in patients with Fanconi anemia who did and did not receive transplants. Blood. 2005;105:67–73. doi: 10.1182/blood-2004-04-1652. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Smith AR, Wagner JE. Current clinical management of Fanconi anemia. Expert Rev Hematol. 2012;5:513–22. doi: 10.1586/ehm.12.48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Dokal I. Dyskeratosis congenita. Hematology Educ Program Am Soc Hematol. 2011;2011:480–6. doi: 10.1182/asheducation-2011.1.480. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Ballew BJ, Savage SA. Updates on the biology and management of dyskeratosis congenita and related telomere biology disorders. Expert Rev Hematol. 2013;6:327–37. doi: 10.1586/ehm.13.23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Vulliamy T, Dokal I. Dyskeratosis congenita. Semin Hematol. 2006;43:157–66. doi: 10.1053/j.seminhematol.2006.04.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Khincha PP, Wentzensen IM, Giri N, Alter BP, Savage SA. Response to androgen therapy in patients with dyskeratosis congenita. Br J Haematol. 2014;165:349–57. doi: 10.1111/bjh.12748. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Dokal I. Dyskeratosis congenita in all its forms. Br J Haematol. 2000;110:768–79. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.2000.02109.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Alter BP, Giri N, Savage SA, Rosenberg PS. Cancer in dyskeratosis congenita. Blood. 2009;113:6549–57. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-12-192880. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Kocak H, Ballew BJ, Bisht K, et al. Hoyeraal–Hreidarsson syndrome caused by a germline mutation in the TEL patch of the telomere protein TPP1. Genes Dev. 2014;28:2090–102. doi: 10.1101/gad.248567.114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Tummala H, Walne A, Collopy L, et al. Poly(A)-specific ribonuclease deficiency impacts telomere biology and causes dyskeratosis congenita. J Clin Invest. 2015;125:2151–60. doi: 10.1172/JCI78963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Fedick AM, Shi L, Jalas C, et al. Carrier screening of RTEL1 mutations in the Ashkenazi Jewish population. Clin Genet. 2015;88:177–81. doi: 10.1111/cge.12459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Baerlocher GM, Vulto I, de JG, Lansdorp PM. Flow cytometry and FISH to measure the average length of telomeres (flow FISH). Nat Protoc. 2006;1:2365–76. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2006.263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Alter BP, Baerlocher GM, Savage SA, et al. Very short telomere length by flow fluorescence in situ hybridization identifies patients with dyskeratosis congenita. Blood. 2007;110:1439–47. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-02-075598. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Giri N, Pitel PA, Green D, Alter BP. Splenic peliosis and rupture in patients with dyskeratosis congenita on androgens and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. Br J Haematol. 2007;138:815–17. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2007.06718.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Gadalla SM, Sales-Bonfim C, Carreras J, et al. Outcomes of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in patients with dyskeratosis congenita. Biol Blood Marrow Transpl. 2013;19:1238–43. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2013.05.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Lipton JM, Ellis SR. Diamond–Blackfan anemia: diagnosis, treatment, and molecular pathogenesis. Hematol Oncol Clin N Amer. 2009;23:261–82. doi: 10.1016/j.hoc.2009.01.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Clinton C, Gazda HT. Diamond–Blackfan anemia. In: Pagon RA, Adam MP, Bird TD, Dolan CR, Fong CT, Stephens K, editors. GeneReviews®. University of Washington, Seattle; Seattle: 1993. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Lipton JM. Diamond blackfan anemia: New paradigms for a “not so pure” inherited red cell aplasia. Semin Hematol. 2006;43:167–77. doi: 10.1053/j.seminhematol.2006.04.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Gazda HT, Sheen MR, Vlachos A, et al. Ribosomal protein L5 and L11 mutations are associated with cleft palate and abnormal thumbs in Diamond–Blackfan anemia patients. Am J Hum Genet. 2008;83:769–80. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2008.11.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Ellis SR, Lipton JM. Diamond Blackfan anemia: a disorder of red blood cell development. Curr Top Dev Biol. 2008;82:217–41. doi: 10.1016/S0070-2153(07)00008-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Vlachos A, Rosenberg PS, Atsidaftos E, Alter BP, Lipton JM. Incidence of neoplasia in Diamond Blackfan anemia: a report from the Diamond Blackfan Anemia Registry. Blood. 2012;119:3815–19. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-08-375972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Draptchinskaia N, Gustavsson P, Andersson B, et al. The gene encoding ribosomal protein S19 is mutated in Diamond–Blackfan anaemia. Nature Genet. 1999;21:169–75. doi: 10.1038/5951. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Sankaran VG, Ghazvinian R, Do R, et al. Exome sequencing identifies GATA1 mutations resulting in Diamond–Blackfan anemia. J Clin Invest. 2012;122:2439–43. doi: 10.1172/JCI63597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Wang R, Yoshida K, Toki T, et al. Loss of function mutations in RPL27 and RPS27 identified by whole-exome sequencing in Diamond–Blackfan anaemia. Br J Haematol. 2015;168:854–64. doi: 10.1111/bjh.13229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Boria I, Garelli E, Gazda HT, et al. The ribosomal basis of Diamond–Blackfan anemia: mutation and database update. Hum Mutat. 2010;31:1269–79. doi: 10.1002/humu.21383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Vlachos A, Ball S, Dahl N, et al. Diagnosing and treating Diamond Blackfan anaemia: results of an international clinical consensus conference. Br J Haematol. 2008;142:859–76. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2008.07269.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Fargo JH, Kratz CP, Giri N, et al. Erythrocyte adenosine deaminase: diagnostic value for Diamond–Blackfan anaemia. Br J Haematol. 2013;160:547–54. doi: 10.1111/bjh.12167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Roggero S, Quarello P, Vinciguerra T, Longo F, Piga A, Ramenghi U. Severe iron overload in Blackfan–Diamond anemia: a case–control study. Am J Hematol. 2009;84:729–32. doi: 10.1002/ajh.21541. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Makitie O, Ellis L, Durie PR, et al. Skeletal phenotype in patients with Shwachman– Diamond syndrome and mutations in SBDS. Clin Genet. 2004;65:101–12. doi: 10.1111/j.0009-9163.2004.00198.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Myers K. Shwachman–Diamond syndrome. In: Pagon RA, Adam MP, Ardinger HH, et al., editors. GeneReviews®. University of Washington; Seattle: 1993. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Woloszynek JR, Rothbaum RJ, Rawls AS, et al. Mutations of the SBDS gene are present in most patients with Shwachman–Diamond syndrome. Blood. 2004;104:3588–90. doi: 10.1182/blood-2004-04-1516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Boocock GR, Morrison JA, Popovic M, et al. Mutations in SBDS are associated with Shwachman–Diamond syndrome. Nat Genet. 2003;33:97–101. doi: 10.1038/ng1062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Myers KC, Bolyard AA, Otto B, et al. Variable clinical presentation of Shwachman– Diamond syndrome: update from the North American Shwachman–Diamond Syndrome Registry. J Pediatr. 2014;164:866–70. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2013.11.039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Shimamura A. Shwachman–Diamond syndrome. Semin Hematol. 2006;43:178–88. doi: 10.1053/j.seminhematol.2006.04.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Burroughs L, Woolfrey A, Shimamura A. Shwachman–Diamond syndrome: a review of the clinical presentation, molecular pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment. Hematol Oncol Clin N Am. 2009;23:233–48. doi: 10.1016/j.hoc.2009.01.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Toriello HV. Thrombocytopenia absent radius syndrome. In: Pagon RA, Adam MP, Bird TD, editors. Gene Reviews. University of Washington; Seattle: 1993. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Alter BP. Aplastic anemia, pediatric aspects. Oncologist. 1996;1:361–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Hedberg VA, Lipton JM. Thrombocytopenia with absent radii. A review of 100 cases. Am J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 1988;10:51–64. doi: 10.1097/00043426-198821000-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Fadoo Z, Naqvi SM. Acute myeloid leukemia in a patient with thrombocytopenia with absent radii syndrome. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2002;24:134–5. doi: 10.1097/00043426-200202000-00015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Go RS, Johnston KL. Acute myelogenous leukemia in an adult with thrombocytopenia with absent radii syndrome. Eur J Haematol. 2003;70:246–8. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0609.2003.00054.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Albers CA, Paul DS, Schulze H, et al. Compound inheritance of a low-frequency regulatory SNP and a rare null mutation in exon-junction complex subunit RBM8A causes TAR syndrome. Nat Genet. 2012;44:435–9. S1–2. doi: 10.1038/ng.1083. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Klopocki E, Schulze H, Strauss G, et al. Complex inheritance pattern resembling autosomal recessive inheritance involving a microdeletion in thrombocytopenia–absent radius syndrome. Am J Hum Genet. 2007;80:232–40. doi: 10.1086/510919. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Toriello HV. Thrombocytopenia–absent radius syndrome. Semin Thromb Hemost. 2011;37:707–12. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1291381. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Ballmaier M, Germeshausen M. Congenital amegakaryocytic thrombocytopenia: clinical presentation, diagnosis, and treatment. Semin Thromb Hemost. 2011;37:673–81. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1291377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Geddis AE. Congenital amegakaryocytic thrombocytopenia. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2011;57:199–203. doi: 10.1002/pbc.22927. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.King S, Germeshausen M, Strauss G, Welte K, Ballmaier M. Congenital amegakaryocytic thrombocytopenia: a retrospective clinical analysis of 20 patients. Br J Haematol. 2005;131:636–44. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2005.05819.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Tamary H, Nishri D, Yacobovich J, et al. Frequency and natural history of inherited bone marrow failure syndromes: the Israeli Inherited Bone Marrow Failure Registry. Haematologica. 2010;95:1300–7. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2009.018119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Maserati E, Panarello C, Morerio C, et al. Clonal chromosome anomalies and propensity to myeloid malignancies in congenital amegakaryocytic thrombocytopenia (OMIM 604498). Haematologica. 2008;93:1271–3. doi: 10.3324/haematol.12748. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Horvat-Switzer RD, Thompson AA. HOXA11 mutation in amegakaryocytic thrombocytopenia with radio-ulnar synostosis syndrome inhibits megakaryocytic differentiation in vitro. Blood Cells Mol Dis. 2006;37:55–63. doi: 10.1016/j.bcmd.2006.04.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Woods G, Bajwa RP, Rose MJ. Reduced intensity transplantation for congenital amegakaryocytic thrombocytopenia: report of a case and review of the literature. Pediatr Transpl. 2014;18:E31–4. doi: 10.1111/petr.12175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Kostman R. Infantile genetic agranulocytosis. A review with presentation of ten new cases. Acta Paediat Scand. 1975;64:362–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.1975.tb03847.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Kostmann R. Infantile genetic agranulocytosis; agranulocytosis infantilis hereditaria. Acta Paediat Suppl. 1956;45:1–78. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Boxer LA. How to approach neutropenia. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2012;2012:174–82. doi: 10.1182/asheducation-2012.1.174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Miller RW. Childhood cancer and congenital defects. A study of U.S. death certificates during the period 1960–1966. Pediatr Res. 1969;3:389–97. doi: 10.1203/00006450-196909000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Wong WY, Williams D, Slovak ML, et al. Terminal acute myelogenous leukemia in a patient with congenital agranulocytosis. Am J Hematol. 1993;43:133–8. doi: 10.1002/ajh.2830430212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Rosen RB, Kang SJ. Congenital agranulocytosis terminating in acute myelomonocytic leukemia. J Pediatr. 1979;94:406–8. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(79)80581-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Gilman PA, Jackson DP, Guild HG. Congenital agranulocytosis: prolonged survival and terminal acute leukemia. Blood. 1970;36:576–85. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Rosenberg PS, Zeidler C, Bolyard AA, et al. Stable long-term risk of leukaemia in patients with severe congenital neutropenia maintained on G-CSF therapy. Br J Haematol. 2010;150:196–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2010.08216.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Rosenberg PS, Alter BP, Bolyard AA, et al. The incidence of leukemia and mortality from sepsis in patients with severe congenital neutropenia receiving long-term G-CSF therapy. Blood. 2006;107:4628–35. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-11-4370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Fouret P, du Bois RM, Bernaudin JF, Takahashi H, Ferrans VJ, Crystal RG. Expression of the neutrophil elastase gene during human bone marrow cell differentiation. J Exp Med. 1989;169:833–45. doi: 10.1084/jem.169.3.833. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Tidwell T, Wechsler J, Nayak RC, et al. Neutropenia-associated ELANE mutations disrupting translation initiation produce novel neutrophil elastase isoforms. Blood. 2014;123:562–9. doi: 10.1182/blood-2013-07-513242. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Horwitz M, Benson KF, Duan Z, et al. Role of neutrophil elastase in bone marrow failure syndromes: molecular genetic revival of the chalone hypothesis. Curr Opin Hematol. 2003;10:49–54. doi: 10.1097/00062752-200301000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Boztug K, Klein C. Genetics and pathophysiology of severe congenital neutropenia syndromes unrelated to neutrophil elastase. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2013;27:43–60. vii. doi: 10.1016/j.hoc.2012.11.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Boztug K, Jarvinen PM, Salzer E, et al. JAGN1 deficiency causes aberrant myeloid cell homeostasis and congenital neutropenia. Nat Genet. 2014;46:1021–7. doi: 10.1038/ng.3069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Boztug K, Klein C. Genetic etiologies of severe congenital neutropenia. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2011;23:21–6. doi: 10.1097/MOP.0b013e32834262f8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Boztug K, Appaswamy G, Ashikov A, et al. A syndrome with congenital neutropenia and mutations in G6PC3. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:32–43. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0805051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Zeidler C, Germeshausen M, Klein C, Welte K. Clinical implications of ELA2-, HAX1-, and G-CSF-receptor (CSF3R) mutations in severe congenital neutropenia. Br J Haematol. 2009;144:459–67. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2008.07425.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Dale DC. ELANE-related neutropenia. In: Pagon RA, Adam MP, Ardinger HH, et al., editors. GeneReviews®. University of Washington; Seattle: 1993. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
