Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Thorax logoLink to Thorax
. 1992 Sep;47(9):734–737. doi: 10.1136/thx.47.9.734

An audit of the clinical investigation of pleural effusion.

A D Walshe 1, J G Douglas 1, K M Kerr 1, M E McKean 1, D J Godden 1
PMCID: PMC474810  PMID: 1440470

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pleural aspiration with pleural biopsy is advised for the investigation of pleural effusion. The clinical investigation of pleural effusion in a group of teaching hospitals was audited with reference to adequacy and diagnostic value of sampling procedures. METHODS: A retrospective review of case records of all patients investigated for pleural effusion during an eight month period was performed. The records of 112 patients, age range 16-91 years, who underwent 150 procedures were reviewed. RESULTS: Microbiology samples were obtained from 137 procedures, of which five provided a positive culture, including one for mycobacteria. Cytology samples were obtained from 145 procedures though approximately two thirds of samples were less than the recommended 30 ml. The pleural biopsy rate was 30%, varying from 0% in general or thoracic surgery to 68% in thoracic medicine (thoracic surgeons carried out thoracoscopy). Twenty nine per cent of pleural biopsy samples were of poor quality. The complication rate was 2% for aspiration alone, and 4% for aspiration plus biopsy. The sensitivity of the first diagnostic procedure for a diagnosis of malignancy or tuberculosis was 53% for cytology alone, 50% for biopsy alone and 72% for cytology plus biopsy. CONCLUSION: The samples obtained from pleural aspiration and biopsy in the initial investigation of pleural effusion are often inadequate. Further education is necessary to improve the quantity and quality of specimens submitted for histological and cytological examination.

Full text

PDF
734

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. CARR D. T., POWER M. H. Clinical value of measurements of concentration of protein in pleural fluid. N Engl J Med. 1958 Nov 6;259(19):926–927. doi: 10.1056/NEJM195811062591909. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Collins T. R., Sahn S. A. Thoracocentesis. Clinical value, complications, technical problems, and patient experience. Chest. 1987 Jun;91(6):817–822. doi: 10.1378/chest.91.6.817. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. LEUALLEN E. C., CARR D. T. Pleural effusion; a statistical study of 436 patients. N Engl J Med. 1955 Jan 20;252(3):79–83. doi: 10.1056/NEJM195501202520301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Light R. W., Erozan Y. S., Ball W. C., Jr Cells in pleural fluid. Their value in differential diagnosis. Arch Intern Med. 1973 Dec;132(6):854–860. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Melsom R. D. Diagnostic reliability of pleural fluid protein estimation. J R Soc Med. 1979 Nov;72(11):823–825. doi: 10.1177/014107687907201106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Mungall I. P., Cowen P. N., Cooke N. T., Roach T. C., Cooke N. J. Multiple pleural biopsy with the Abrams needle. Thorax. 1980 Aug;35(8):600–602. doi: 10.1136/thx.35.8.600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Prakash U. B., Reiman H. M. Comparison of needle biopsy with cytologic analysis for the evaluation of pleural effusion: analysis of 414 cases. Mayo Clin Proc. 1985 Mar;60(3):158–164. doi: 10.1016/s0025-6196(12)60212-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. SISON B. S., WEISS W. Needle biopsy of the parietal pleura in patients with pleural effusion. Br Med J. 1962 Aug 4;2(5300):298–300. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.5300.298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Sahn S. A. State of the art. The pleura. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1988 Jul;138(1):184–234. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/138.1.184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Scerbo J., Keltz H., Stone D. J. A prospective study of closed pleural biopsies. JAMA. 1971 Oct 18;218(3):377–380. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Thorax are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES