Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2016 Feb 10;6:21673. doi: 10.1038/srep21673

Probing the spectral density of the surface electromagnetic fields through scattering of waveguide photons

Guang-Yin Chen 1,a
PMCID: PMC4748287  PMID: 26860197

Abstract

The spectral density of the metal-surface electromagnetic fields will be strongly modified in the presence of a closely-spaced quantum emitter. In this work, we propose a feasible way to probe the changes of the spectral density through the scattering of the waveguide photon incident on the quantum emitter. The variances of the lineshape in the transmission spectra indicate the coherent interaction between the emitter and the pseudomode resulting from all the surface electromagnetic modes. We further investigate the quantum coherence between the emitter and the pseudomode of the metal-dielectric interface.


Surface-plasmon polariton (SPP), an electromagnetic (EM) excitation existing on the surface of the metals1,2, can be excited by the external fields. Resulting from its strong interaction with the quantum emitter (QE), significant enhancement of the atomic or excitonic decay rate has been observed1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9. With strong analogies to light propagation in conventional dielectric components10,11, SPP has been applied to achieve the subwavelength waveguiding below the diffraction limit, the bipartite quantum entanglement12,13, and to miniaturize existing photonic circuits14. The strong coupling between the QE and surface plasmon fields also enables the system to act like a lossy optical cavity, namely, the interaction can be coherent5,7.

Recently, it has been reported15 that with small enough separation between the quantum emitter (QE) and the metal-dielectric interface, the spectra density of the system changes from smooth to Lorentzian, leading to the reversible population dynamics between the quantum emitter and the metal surface. However, it might not be easy to observe this reversible dynamics by measuring the population. In this work, we propose a feasible way to indirectly observe the reversibility in population through the scattering of the waveguide photon incident on the quantum emitter. The variances of the transmission lineshapes reveal the existence of the coherent coupling between the quantum emitter and the dominant electromagnetic modes of the metal surface. This proposal can be further applied to detect the defects in the system with excitonic coherent couplings such as the excitation transfer in the photosynthetic complex16.

Results

We consider a two level QE positioned close to a two-dimensional metal-dielectric interface as depicted in Fig. 1(a). The QE is coupled electromagnetically to the SP modes on the metal surface. The Hamiltonian of this QE-metal film system can then be written within the rotating-wave approximation17 as:

Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the system.

Figure 1

(a) Schematic diagram of a quantum emitter coupled to dielectric-metal interface. A single waveguide-photon incident on the quantum emiiter enables us to detect the coherent interaction between the quantum emitter and the metal surface. In this work, we consider silver thin film with thickness h = 5 nm to be the metal surface. We have assumed the silver film is embedded into a dielectric material with Inline graphic. Here Inline graphic is the separation between the quantum emitter and the silver surface, and the permittivity of the silver film Inline graphic with the plasma frequency Inline graphic eV, Inline graphic, and the Ohmic losses Inline graphic eV. (b) An illustration of the model. When the separation Inline graphic is small enough, the spectra density of the system becomes Lorentzian. The system can then be regarded as a quantum emitter coherently coupled to a pseudomode with dissipative Ohmic losses. (c) The ratio of the effective coupling strength Inline graphic and the decay rate into Ohmic losses Inline graphic as a function of the separation Inline graphic.

graphic file with name srep21673-m1.jpg

where Inline graphic Inline graphic is the creation (annihilation) operator of the k-mode surface-EM-filed, Inline graphic is the frequency of the k-mode surface-EM-field, and Inline graphic Inline graphic is the raising (lowering) operator for the QE. Here, Inline graphic describes the coupling strength between the QE and the k-mode surface-EM-field, and Inline graphic is set to be unity throughout the paper.

A recent research15 studied the spectra density which comprises information about the density of the surface EM-fields, and also the QE-field coupling. The results reveal that when the separation Inline graphic, as seen in Fig. 1(a)] between the QE and the metal surface decreases to a small distance (≤10 nm), the spectra density Inline graphic can change from smooth to the Lorentzian distribution,

graphic file with name srep21673-m11.jpg

where, Inline graphic is the spontaneous decay rate of the QE into free space. In this work, we consider the silver thin film with thickness h=5 nm to be the metal surface. Therefore, Inline graphic eV (for silver) is the plasma frequency, and Inline graphic denotes the energy spacing of the QE. Here, c is the speed of light, Inline graphic eV (for silver) denotes the field-damping rate of the surface-EM-field into Ohmic losses, and Inline graphic eV (for silver thin film) is the main peak of the Lorentzian function.

As a result, the Lorentzian spectra density of the system allows us to map the system to the excited state of QE coherently coupled with a strength Inline graphic to a pesudomode15,18 with a Markovian dissipation Inline graphic as depicted in Fig. 1(b). The dynamical evolution of the QE is govern by the master equation15,

graphic file with name srep21673-m19.jpg

with Inline graphic describing the energy of the QE, the pseudomode Inline graphic and the coherent interaction between them with strength Inline graphic. Here Inline graphic Inline graphic is the creation (annihilation) operator of the pseudomode. In Eq. (3), Inline graphic is the density matrix of the total system. By taking the notation Inline graphic, the Lindblad term, Inline graphic describes the surface-EM-field damping with rate Inline graphic into Ohmic loss.

According to Eq. (3), the population shows reversible dynamics between the QE and the pseudomode which represents all the electromagnetic modes of the metal surface. Since the pseudomode is originated from the Lorentzian spectra density [Eq. (2)] of the system, its energy Inline graphic is exactly the main peak Inline graphic. The effective loss Inline graphic of the pesudomode corresponding to the width of the Lorentzian function is the Ohmic loss Inline graphic, while the coherent coupling strength Inline graphic can be given by15

graphic file with name srep21673-m34.jpg

In Eq. (4), we can see that since Inline graphic, the dependence on Inline graphic cancels, the effective coherent coupling strength then depends mainly on the separation Inline graphic. In Fig. 1(c), we plot the coupling Inline graphic as a function of the separation, and as can be seen, it decreases with growing separation Inline graphic, which coincides with its near-field nature1. Notice that when the separation Inline graphic increases, the Lorentzian spectra becomes flatter, and the coherent interaction fades out accordingly15.

Experimentally, to observe the reversible dynamics of the system, one needs to perform the time-resolved measurements to the population evolution of the QE. However, the reversible dynamics inevitably suffers the dissipations such as the Ohmic losses. It might not be easy to observe the dynamics in practice.

Here, we propose a feasible way to detect the existence of the coherent interaction between the QE and the pseudomode through scattering of the waveguide-photon fields. We consider a waveguide coupled to the QE as shown in Fig. 1(a). A single waveguide-photon injected from the left is coherently scattered by the QE. After performing the rotating-wave approximation17, the total Hamiltonian of the system with the additional probing waveguide-photon fields becomes,

graphic file with name srep21673-m41.jpg

where Inline graphic Inline graphic is the creation (annihilation) operator of the η-mode waveguide-photon, Inline graphic is the frequency of the waveguide-photon, and Inline graphic describes the coupling strength between the QE and the η-mode waveguide-photon, which leads to the decay of the QE into the waveguide. Note that, here the QE is coupled to both the waveguide-photon-fields and the surface-EM-fields. However, since the surface-EM-field decays exponentially with distance from the surface1,2, the interaction between the surface-EM-fields and the waveguide is extremely small (see detailed discussion in the experimental realization part), and cannot affect the coupling between the emitter and the waveguide. The coupling strength Inline graphic can therefore be treated as a perturbation to the original QE-metal film system and can be further assumed to be frequency-independent, this assumption is equivalent to the Markov approximation19,20. Because we are only interested in the way the system behaves in experiments, it is sufficient to include the dissipative channels in Eq. (3) via introducing the non-Hermitian term Inline graphic in the total Hamiltonian and the “quantum jump”21 term can be neglected.

The scattering eigenstate state of the above combined system can be written as5,22:

graphic file with name srep21673-m48.jpg

where Inline graphic describes that the QE is in the ground state with no excitation in the pseudomode and the photon field state, while Inline graphic is the probability amplitude that the QE (pseudomode) absorbs the excitation. We also assume that the field is incident from the left of the waveguide, Inline graphic and Inline graphic therefore take the form,

graphic file with name srep21673-m53.jpg

Here, t and r are the transmission and reflection amplitude, respectively, and Inline graphic is the unit step function. The total Hamiltonian [Eq. (5)] can be further transformed22,23,24 into real-space representation, Inline graphic, and applied to the scattering eigenstate [Eq. (6)]. The transmission spectrum Inline graphic and the probability amplitudes ξ, ξp can then be obtained by solving the eigenvalue equation Inline graphic.

In Fig. 2(a), we plot the transmission coefficient Inline graphic for different energy spacings of the QE, QE-metal separations, and the coupling strengths Inline graphic as functions of the energy of the incident waveguide-photon. If there is no coherent interaction Inline graphic, namely, the spectra density of the surface EM-fields is smooth without significant signatures of resonant peaks, the QE then interacts with the continuum of SPP modes [see Eq. (1)] with equal coupling strength Inline graphic, leading to a strong decay rate5 Inline graphic into SPPs. This rate can be included in the QE Hamiltonian with an additional non-Hermitian term Inline graphic. Here the SPP modes, not a pseudomode, plays the role of a dissipative Markovian environment. In the QE-SP system, due to the relative strong coupling, the rate Inline graphic can be large compared with Inline graphic and Inline graphic, we set1,5,25 Inline graphic in this work. As seen in Fig. 2(a), the profile of the transmission coefficient T (red-dashed curve, with Inline graphic eV, Inline graphic nm) is just the dissipative single particle transmission lineshape5,12. However, when the spectral density of the surface-EM-fields is Lorentzian, the QE-pseudomode coherent coupling Inline graphic exists (thus, Inline graphic, the profile of T (black-solid curve, with Inline graphic eV, Inline graphic nm, and Inline graphic eV) significantly changes to two-dip lineshape. We therefore can precisely detect the existence of the coherent interaction between the QE and the pesudomode.

Figure 2. The scattering spectra of the incident waveguide-photon.

Figure 2

(a) The transmission coefficient T as a function of the energy of the incident waveguide-photon. The black-solid curve takes the parameters: Inline graphic eV, Inline graphic nm, and Inline graphic eV. The red-dashed curve is for Inline graphic eV, Inline graphic nm, Inline graphic meV, and Inline graphic. The green-dotted-dashed curve is for Inline graphic eV, Inline graphic nm, and Inline graphic eV. The blue-dotted curve is for Inline graphic eV, Inline graphic nm, and Inline graphic eV. Notice that in plotting (a), the coupling strength Inline graphic between the waveguide-photon and the quantum emitter is fixed to be 50 meV. (b) Comparisons of the transmission spectra for different coupling strength Inline graphic. The black-solid curve adopts all the parameters of the black-solid curve in (a), the red-dashed uses Inline graphic meV, and the blue-dotted curve uses Inline graphic meV.

The green-dotted-dashed curve (with Inline graphic eV, Inline graphic nm, and Inline graphic0.14 eV) in Fig. 2(a) shows that for larger separation Inline graphic, Inline graphic decreases as shown in Fig. 1(c), leading to a remarkably different profile comparing with the black-solid curve. In order to compare the profiles of T with different energy spacings of the QE, we also plot the blue-dotted curve (with Inline graphic eV, Inline graphic nm, and Inline graphic eV). As can be seen, it has a different zero point of T from the case of Inline graphic eV. These results indicate that through the scattering of the waveguide-photon, we can detect not only the existence of the coherent interaction, but the varies of the coupling, and even the effect of different energy spacings of the QE from the transmission spectra.

In plotting Fig. 2(a), we assume the coupling between the waveguide-photon and the QE is Inline graphic meV. However, this coupling Inline graphic in practice varies with the QE-waveguide separation26, we therefore plot the transmission coefficient T with different Inline graphic in Fig. 2(b). As shown, although the lineshape becomes sharper when reducing the strength of Inline graphic, the profile can still be distinguished. This means that even with small Inline graphic, we can still detect the existence of the coherent interaction Inline graphic.

Discussion

Since the pseudomode has the coherent interaction with the QE, it will be interesting to study the quantum coherence between the QE and the pseudomode. We calculate the concurrence27 which quantifies the degree of the bipartite entanglement and also shows the behavior of the quantum coherence. In our scattering approach, after tracing out the microwave-photon fields, the reduced density matrix of the bipartite state is a pure state, and the concurrence simply takes the form Inline graphic. In Fig. 3(a), we plot the concurrence as black-solid (red-dashed) curve for parameters adopted from the black-solid (green-dotted-dashed) curve in Fig. 2(a). As can be seen in Fig. 3(a), the concurrence is non-zero positive, indicating that there exists quantum coherence between the QE and the pseudomode. One can also see that there is a dip in the concurrence lineshape, and when Inline graphic decreases, the dip shrinks. In order to see more insights about the behavior of the concurrence, in Fig. 3(b) we plot the black-solid curve in (a) again without the dissipations, meanwhile, we also plot the normalized Inline graphic (red-dashed) and Inline graphic (blue-dotted). The dips occurs when the energy of the incident waveguide-photon Inline graphic is resonant with the energy of the pseudomode Inline graphic. This is because in our scattering approach, the QE state and the pseudomode are within a different subspace from the field states. When the excitation is in the QE, it transfers to the pseudomode via the coherent interaction, the excitation therefore completely transfers to the pseudomode when Inline graphic. This also explains why the dip shrinks when the coherent coupling Inline graphic becomes smaller.

Figure 3. The quantum coherence between the quantum emitter and the pseudomode.

Figure 3

(a) The concurrence of the quantum emitter and the pseudomode as a function of the energy of the incident waveguide-photon. The black-solid curve takes the parameters Inline graphic eV, Inline graphic nm, and Inline graphic eV. The red-dashed curve takes: Inline graphic eV, Inline graphic nm, and Inline graphic0.14 eV. (b) The black-solid curve takes all the parameters of the black-solid curve in (a) but without dissipations Inline graphic. The red-dashed (blue-dotted) curve is the modulus of the probability amplitude Inline graphic Inline graphic. In plotting this figure, the coupling strength Inline graphic is set to be Inline graphic meV.

For the experimental realizations, high QE-waveguide coupling strength can be achieved with dielectric waveguides such as photonic crystal waveguides28 and dielectric slot waveguides29. However, in order not to seriously affect the spatial structure of the surface-EM-fields, we suggest to utilize the plasmonic nanowire30 as the probing waveguide, and the II–VI colloidal quantum dots (e.g., CdSe/ZnS quantum dots with exciton energy around 2–2.5 eV) placed close to a silver thin-film to form the QE-metal film system. Due to the nature that being a near field, the intensity of the surface-EM fields decays exponentially away from the surface1,2. In this work, we set the QE-waveguide coupling Inline graphic to be a few tens of meV, which is small compared with the QE-metal film coupling Inline graphic (∼a few hundreds of meV). Figure 1(c) and Eq. (4) gave us a rough estimation that to achieve this magnitude of the coupling strength, the plasmonics metal-nanowire waveguide is about 30 nm away from the QE. Given the physical size of the II–VI colloidal quantum dot (∼10 nm) and the QE-metal film separation (∼5 nm), the plasmonic waveguide is actually about 50 nm away from the metal film. With this separation, the intensity of the surface-EM fields decays to 6 orders smaller15. It therefore can only very slightly affect the plasmonic nanowire waveguide, and similarly, the fields of the waveguide can only slightly affect the metal thin film. This is the reason we treat the waveguide fields and the surface-EM fields as independent fields, and QE-waveguide coupling Inline graphic as a perturbation to the original QE- metal film system. The plasmonic metal-nanowire therefore plays a role probing the reversible dynamics in the QE-metal film system.

Summarizing, we propose that through the scattering of the waveguide-photon incident on a quantum emitter, one could precisely measure the coherent interaction leading to reversible dynamics in population between the quantum emitter and the dielectric-metal interface. The behavior of the quantum coherence between the quantum emitter and the metal surface has been also studied by calculating the bipartite entanglement.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Chen, G.-Y. Probing the spectral density of the surface electromagnetic fields through scattering of waveguide photons. Sci. Rep. 6, 21673; doi: 10.1038/srep21673 (2016).

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by the Minister of Science and Technology, Taiwan, grant number MOST 102-2112-M-005-009-MY3.

Footnotes

Author Contributions G.-Y.C. carried out the calculations and the writing of the manuscript.

References

  1. Tame M. S. et al. Quantum plasmonics. Nature Phys. 9, 329–340 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  2. Törmä P. & Barnes W. L. Strong coupling between surface plasmon polaritons and emitters. Rep. Prog. Phys. 78, 013901 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Akimov A. V. et al. Generation of single optical plasmons in metallic nanowires coupled to quantum dots. Nature 450, 402–406 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chang D. E., Sørensen A. S., Hemmer P. R. & Lukin M. D. Quantum Optics with Surface Plasmons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 053002 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chang D. E., Sørensen A. S., Demler E. A. & Lukin M. D. A single-photon transistor using nanoscale surface plasmons. Nature Phys. 3, 807 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  6. Chen G. Y., Chen Y. N. & Chuu D. S. Spontaneous emission of quantum dot excitons into surface plasmons in a nanowire. Opt. Lett. 33, 2212–2214 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chen Y. N., Chen G. Y., Chuu D. S. & Brandes T. Quantum-dot exciton dynamics with a surface plasmon: Band-edge quantum optics. Phys. Rev. A 79, 033815 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  8. Okamoto K. et al. Surface-plasmon-enhanced light emitters based on InGaN quantum wells. Nature Mater. 3, 601–605 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Paiella R. Tunable surface plasmons in coupled metallo-dielectric multiple layers for light-emission efficiency enhancement. Appl. Phys. Lett. 87, 111104 (2005). [Google Scholar]
  10. Zia R. & Brongersma M. L. Surface plasmon polariton analogue to Young’s double-slit experiment. Nature Nanotech. 2, 426–429 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Savelev S., Yampolskii V. A., Rakhmanov A. L. & Nori F. Terahertz Josephson plasma waves in layered superconductors: spectrum, generation, nonlinear and quantum phenomena. Rep. Prog. Phys. 73, 026501 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  12. Chen G. Y., Lambert N., Chou C. H., Chen Y. N. & Nori F. Surface plasmons in a metal nanowire coupled to colloidal quantum dots: Scattering properties and quantum entanglement. Phys. Rev. B 84, 045310 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  13. Gonzalez-Tudela A. et al. Entanglement of Two Qubits Mediated by One-Dimensional Plasmonic Waveguides. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 020501 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Bozhevolnyi S. I., Volkov V. S., Devaux E., Laluet J. & Ebbesen T. W. Channel plasmon subwavelength waveguide components including interferometers and ring resonators. Nature 440, 508–511 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. González-Tudela A., Huidobro P. A., Martn-Moreno L., Tejedor C. & Garca-Vidal F. J. Reversible dynamics of single quantum emitters near metal-dielectric interfaces. Phys. Rev. B 89, 041402 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  16. Chen G. Y., Lamber N., Li C. M., Chen Y. N. & Nori F. Rerouting excitation transfers in the Fenna-Matthews-Olson complex. Phys. Rev. E 88, 032120 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Vogel W. & Welsch D.-G. Quantum Optics (John Wiley & Sons, Berlin, 2006). [Google Scholar]
  18. Elattari B. & Gurvitz S. A. Influence of measurement on the lifetime and the linewidth of unstable systems. Phys. Rev. A 62, 032102 (2000). [Google Scholar]
  19. Shen J. T. & Fan S. Theory of single-photon transport in a single-mode waveguide. I. Coupling to a cavity containing a two-level atom. Phys. Rev. A 79, 023837 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  20. Gardiner C. W. & Collett M. J. Input and output in damped quantum systems: Quantum stochastic differential equations and the master equation. Phys. Rev. A 31, 3761–3774 (1985). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Meystre P. & Sargent M. III Elements of Quantum Optics [370–372] (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, 2007). [Google Scholar]
  22. Shen J. T. & Fan S. Coherent photon transport from spontaneous emission in one-dimensional waveguides. Opt. Lett. 30, 2001–2003 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Zhou L., Gong Z. R., Liu Y. X., Sun C. P. & Nori F. Controllable scattering of a single photon inside a one-dimensional resonator waveguide. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 100501 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Liao J. Q., Gong Z. R., Zhou L., Liu Y. X., Sun C. P. & Nori F. Controlling the transport of single photons by tuning the frequency of either one or two cavities in an array of coupled cavities. Phys. Rev. A 81, 042304 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  25. Ma R. M., Oulton R. F., Sorger V. J., Bartal G. & Zhang X. Room-temperature sub-diffraction-limited plasmon laser by total internal reflection. Nature Mater. 10, 110–113 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Gonzalez-Ballestero C., Moreno E. & Garcia-Vidal F. J. Generation, manipulation, and detection of two-qubit entanglement in waveguide QED. Phys. Rev. A 89, 042328 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  27. Wootters W. K. Entanglement of formation of an arbitrary state of two qubits. Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 2245–2248 (1998). [Google Scholar]
  28. Arcari M. et al. Near-Unity coupling efficiency of a quantum emitter to a photonic crystal waveguide. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 093603 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Kolchin P., Pholchai N., Mikkelsen M. H., Oh J., Ota S., Saif Islam M., Yin X. & Zhang X. High Purcell factor due to coupling of a single emitter to a dielectric slot waveguide. Nano Lett. 15, 464–468 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Kolesov R., Grotz B., Balasubramanian G., Stöhr R. J., Nicolet A. A. L., Hemmer P. R., Jelezko F. & Wrachtrup J. Wave-particle duality of single surface plasmon polaritons. Nat. Phys. 5, 470–474 (2009). [Google Scholar]

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES