Skip to main content
Indian Journal of Plastic Surgery : Official Publication of the Association of Plastic Surgeons of India logoLink to Indian Journal of Plastic Surgery : Official Publication of the Association of Plastic Surgeons of India
letter
. 2015 Sep-Dec;48(3):321–322. doi: 10.4103/0970-0358.173140

A simple technique of marking the perforator of a free flap for postoperative monitoring

Hari Venkatramani 1, Gururaj Hosahalli 1, S Raja Sabapathy 1,
PMCID: PMC4750270  PMID: 26933291

Sir,

Monitoring of a free flap or a perforator flap is important in the immediate postoperative period to alert the surgeon of a vascular event and to enable flap salvage by early intervention.

Monitoring is usually done by nurses.

There are many methods of flap monitoring. The conventional method[1] of flap monitoring with a hand-held Doppler is a common method employed by doctors and nurses in the immediate postoperative period. Accurately placing the Doppler on the site of the perforator is important for proper flap monitoring. The site to be assessed by the Doppler (i.e., the site of the perforator) is usually marked by scoring the skin or marking by ink on the surface of the flap at the end of surgery. We are presenting here a simple method we have employed over the past 3 years to mark the site of the perforator which has a reliable accuracy in assessing and monitoring with different observers.

The normal self-adhesive electrocardiogram (ECG) lead is taken [Figure 1], the centre part is removed, leaving a hole in the middle [Figure 2]. At the end of the surgery, the surgeon places the ECG lead with the centre directly lying on the perforator to be assessed [Figures 3 and 4]. The lead stays on the first 5 days and makes it easy for everyone to place the Doppler consistently in the right spot. Caution calls due to doubts about the vascular status of the flap have become much lower ever since we started this method for marking.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

ECG lead (electrode)

Figure 2.

Figure 2

ECG lead (electrode) with a hole cut in the middle

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Doppler being done on the ALT flap perforator site marked by ECG lead (electrode)

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Doppler being done in a case of buried ALT flap in reconstruction of post-maxillectomy defect—vascular anastomotic site marked by ECG lead (electrode)

This method of marking for flap monitoring is better, because there is no need to worry about the marking being erased with sweat and moisture, as it happens when marked with ink or the scored skin not being visible due to rapid epidermal healing.

This method of marking can be used in all places the Doppler is used, such as in monitoring the perforator in case of the anterolateral thigh (ALT) flap [Figure 3], radial artery flap, free fibular flap, anastomotic site in cases of buried flap [Figure 4], when other conventional methods are not possible, and dorsalis pedis artery or radial artery in case of revascularization.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

REFERENCE

  • 1.Smit JM, Zeebregts CJ, Acosta R, Werker PM. Advancements in free flap monitoring in the last decade: A critical review. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125:177–85. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181c49580. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Indian Journal of Plastic Surgery : Official Publication of the Association of Plastic Surgeons of India are provided here courtesy of Thieme Medical Publishers

RESOURCES