Abstract
The complexity of cancer chemotherapy requires pharmacists be familiar with the complicated regimens and highly toxic agents used. This column reviews various issues related to preparation, dispensing, and administration of antineoplastic therapy, and the agents, both commercially available and investigational, used to treat malignant diseases. Questions or suggestions for topics should be addressed to Dominic A. Solimando, Jr, President, Oncology Pharmacy Services, Inc., 4201 Wilson Blvd #110-545, Arlington, VA 22203, e-mail: OncRxSvc@comcast.net; or J. Aubrey Waddell, Professor, University of Tennessee College of Pharmacy; Oncology Pharmacist, Pharmacy Department, Blount Memorial Hospital, 907 E. Lamar Alexander Parkway, Maryville, TN 37804, e-mail: waddfour@charter.net.
| Regimen name: | Clo+Ara-C |
| Origin of name: | The regimen is named for the 2 medications in the regimen: clofarabine and cytarabine. |
Comments
Clofarabine is a second-generation deoxyadenosine analog that was rationally synthesized to combine the cytotoxic properties of fludarabine and cladribine while avoiding the dose-limiting neurotoxicity of other deoxyadenosine analogs.1 The regimen, clofarabine and cytarabine, was developed in an effort to improve the outcomes of older, poor prognosis, acute myeloid leukemia patients with comorbidities such as a cardiovascular disease (Table 1).2–5
Table 1. Clofarabine and cytarabine regimen2,3,11,13.
| Drug | Dose | Route of administration | Administered on day(s) | Total dose/cycle |
| Clofarabine | 40 mg/m2 | IV | 1,2,3,4,5 | 200 mg/m2 |
| Cytarabine | 1000 mg/m2 | IV | 1,2,3,4,5 | 5000 mg/m2 |
| Cycle repeats: every 4 weeks2,3 | ||||
| Variations | ||||
| 1. Faderl et al used the above regimen but clofarabine was administered on days 2 through 6 for induction; clofarabine 40 mg/m2 IV on days 1 through 3 and cytarabine 1000 mg/m2 IV on days 1 through 3 for consolidation.4 | ||||
| 2. Faderl et al used clofarabine 30 mg/m2 IV on days 1 through 5 and cytarabine 20 mg/m2 SQ on days 1 through 14 for induction; clofarabine 30 mg/m2 IV on days 1 through 3 and cytarabine 20 mg/m2 SQ on days 1 through 7 for consolidation.5 | ||||
| 3. Faderl et al used clofarabine 20 mg/m2 IV on days 1 through 5 and cytarabine 20 mg/m2 SQ twice daily on days 1 through 10 for induction, then alternated with decitabine 20 mg/m2 IV on days 1 through 5 in patients not in complete remission; clofarabine 20 mg/m2 IV on days 1 through 3 and cytarabine 20 mg/m2 SQ twice daily, then alternating with decitabine 20 mg/m2 IV days 1 through 5 for consolidation.6 | ||||
| 4. Faderl et al used clofarabine 40 mg/m2 IV on days 2 through 6 and cytarabine 1000 mg/m2 IV on days 1 through 5 for induction; clofarabine 30 mg/m2 IV on days 2 through 6 and cytarabine 750 mg/m2 IV on days 1 through 5 for consolidation.7 | ||||
| 5. Martinez-Cuadron et al used clofarabine 20 mg/m2 IV on days 1 through 5 and cytarabine 20 mg/m2 SQ on days 1 through 14 for induction; clofarabine 15 mg/m2 IV on days 1 through 5 and cytarabine 20 mg/m2 SQ on days 1 through 7 for consolidation.8 | ||||
| 6. Becker et al used filgrastim 5 mcg/kg SQ on day 0 and continuing until ANC ≥1000 cells/mcL for 2 consecutive days, clofarabine 25 mg/m2 IV on days 1 through 5, and cytarabine 2000 mg/m2 IV on days 1 through 5 for induction; filgrastim 5 mcg/kg SQ on day 0 and continuing until ANC ≥1000 cells/mcL for 2 consecutive days, clofarabine 20 mg/m2 IV on days 1 through 5, and cytarabine 1000 mg/m2 IV on days 1 through 5 for consolidation.9 | ||||
| 7. Scappini et al used clofarabine 22.5 mg/m2 IV on days 1 through 5 and cytarabine 1000 mg/m2 SQ on days 1 through 5 for induction; clofarabine 22.5 mg/m2 IV on days 1 through 4 and cytarabine 1000 mg/m2 SQ on days 1 through 4 for consolidation.10 | ||||
| 8. Cooper et al used clofarabine 52 mg/m2 IV on days 1 through 5 and cytarabine 1000 mg/m2 IV on days 1 through 5.11 | ||||
| 9. Inaba et al used sorafenib 200 mg/m2 PO twice daily on days 1 through 12, clofarabine 40 mg/m2 IV on days 8 through 12 and cytarabine 1000 mg/m2 IV on days 8 through 12.12 | ||||
| 10. Martin et al used clofarabine 40 mg/m2 IV on days −6 through −2, cytarabine 1000 mg/m2 IV on days −6 through −2, and rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin 1 mg/kg IV over 6 hours on day −4 and 2.5 mg/kg IV on days −3 and −2 for allogenic stem cell transplant conditioning for myelodysplastic syndrome or acute myeloid leukemia.13 | ||||
Note: ANC = absolute neutrophil count; IV = intravenous; SQ = subcutaneous.
Indications
Clofarabine and cytarabine is an alternative treatment for patients with de novo, relapsed, or refractory acute myeloid leukemia.2–12 The regimen has also been used as a conditioning regimen for allogenic bone marrow transplantation.13 Current guidelines recommend clofarabine and granulocyte colony stimulating factor with or without cytarabine, and/or idarubicin for aggressive therapy in appropriate patients with relapsed or refractory disease.14
Drug Preparation
Follow institutional policies for preparation of hazardous medications when preparing and dispensing clofarabine and cytarabine.
-
A.Clofarabine
-
1.Use clofarabine injection 1 mg/mL.
-
2.Filter through a 0.2 micron filter into the final container.
-
3.Dilute in 250 to 1000 mL of 0.9% sodium chloride (NS) or 5% dextrose in water (D5W) to a final concentration of 0.15 to 0.4 mg/mL.
-
1.
-
B.Cytarabine
-
1.Use cytarabine injection 20 mg/mL, 100 mg/mL, or cytarabine powder for injection.
-
2.Reconstitute the powder with NS, D5W or sterile water for injection to a concentration of 20 mg/mL, 50 mg/mL, or 100 mg/mL.
-
3.Dilute in 250 to 1000 mL NS or D5W.
-
4.To avoid potential toxicity, benzyl alcohol preserved diluents should be avoided for the reconstitution of cytarabine.
-
1.
Drug Administration
Supportive Care
-
A.Acute and Delayed Emesis Prophylaxis: The clofarabine and cytarabine regimen is predicted to cause acute emesis in 30% to 90% of patients.15–18 However, nausea was reported in only one of the trials reviewed, with 3% of patients reporting grade 3 or 4 nausea.3 Prophylactic antiemetic therapy with a serotonin antagonist is recommended,16–18 but may not be required in all patients. One group suggests addition of a neurokinin (NK1) antagonist may be appropriate in some patients.16 One of the following regimens given 30 minutes prior to therapy is recommended:
-
1.Ondansetron 8 mg to 16 mg orally (PO), ±dexamethasone 12 mg PO, given 30 minutes before clofarabine each day.
-
2.Granisetron 1 mg to 2 mg PO, ±dexamethasone 12 mg PO, given 30 minutes before clofarabine each day.
-
3.Dolasetron 100 mg PO, ±dexamethasone 12 mg PO, given 30 minutes before clofarabine each day.
-
4.Palonosetron 0.25 mg IV and dexamethasone 12 mg PO, given 30 minutes before clofarabine on day 1 only.
If a neurokinin antagonist is used, one of the following regimens is recommended:-
1.Ondansetron 8 mg to 16 mg and dexamethasone 12 mg, 30 minutes before clofarabine each day, and aprepitant 125 mg given PO 30 minutes before clofarabine on day 1.
-
2.Granisetron 1 mg to 2 mg, dexamethasone 12 mg, 30 minutes before clofarabine each day, and aprepitant 125 mg given PO 30 minutes before clofarabine on day 1.
-
3.Dolasetron 100 mg, dexamethasone 12 mg PO, 30 minutes before clofarabine each day, and aprepitant 125 mg given PO 30 minutes before clofarabine on day 1.
-
4.Palonosetron 0.25 mg IV, dexamethasone 12 mg, and aprepitant 125 mg given PO 30 minutes before clofarabine on day 1 only.
-
5.Aprepitant 80 mg PO should be given on the morning of days 2 and 3. Although not well supported by clinical trials, some clinicians prefer to give aprepitant 80 mg daily on days 2 through 5.
The antiemetic therapy should continue for at least 3 days after the last dose of clofarabine and cytarabine. A meta-analysis of several trials of serotonin antagonists recommends against prolonged (greater than 24 hours) use of these agents, making a steroid, or steroid and dopamine antagonist combination, most appropriate for follow-up therapy.19 One of the following regimens is recommended, beginning on day 6:-
1.Dexamethasone 4 mg PO twice a day for 3 days, ±metoclopramide 0.5 to 2 mg/kg PO every 4 to 6 hours, ±diphenhydramine 25 to 50 mg PO every 6 hours if needed.
-
2.Dexamethasone 4 mg PO twice a day for 3 days, ±prochlorperazine 10 mg PO every 4 to 6 hours, ±diphenhydramine 25 to 50 mg PO every 6 hours if needed.
-
3.Dexamethasone 4 mg PO twice a day for 3 days, ±promethazine 25 to 50 mg PO every 4 to 6 hours, ±diphenhydramine 25 to 50 mg PO every 6 hours if needed.
Patients who experience significant nausea or vomiting with one of these regimens should receive an agent from a different pharmacologic category.15–18 There is no evidence that substituting granisetron for ondansetron in subsequent treatment cycles or increasing the dose, even to very high doses, is effective. This approach is not recommended.20–24
-
1.
-
B.Breakthrough Nausea and Vomiting15–18: Patients should receive a prescription for an antiemetic to treat breakthrough nausea. One of the following regimens is recommended:
-
1.Metoclopramide 0.5 to 2 mg/kg PO every 4 to 6 hours if needed, ±diphenhydramine 25 to 50 mg PO every 6 hours if needed.
-
2.Prochlorperazine 10 mg PO every 4 to 6 hours if needed, ±diphenhydramine 25 to 50 mg PO every 6 hours if needed.
-
3.Prochlorperazine 25 mg rectally every 4 to 6 hours if needed, ±diphenhydramine 25 to 50 mg PO every 4 to 6 hours if needed.
-
4.Promethazine 25 to 50 mg PO every 4 to 6 hours if needed, ±diphenhydramine 25 to 50 mg PO every 4 to 6 hours if needed.
Patients who do experience significant nausea or vomiting with one of these regimens should receive an agent from a different pharmacologic category.15–18 There is no evidence that substituting granisetron for ondansetron in subsequent treatment cycles or increasing the dose, even to very high doses, is effective. This approach is not recommended.20–24
-
1.
-
C.
Hematopoietic Growth Factors: Accepted practice guidelines and pharmacoeconomic analysis suggest that an antineoplastic regimen have a 20% or higher incidence of febrile neutropenia before prophylactic use of colony stimulating factors (CSFs) is warranted. For regimens with an incidence of febrile neutropenia between 10% and 20%, use of CSFs should be considered. For regimens with an incidence of febrile neutropenia less than 10%, routine prophylactic use of CSFs is not recommended.25,26
Severe (grade 3 or 4) neutropenia was reported in 11% of patients in the clofarabine and cytarabine trials reviewed; febrile neutropenia was reported in 47% of patients.2 Usually prophylactic use of CSFs is recommended in regimens that cause febrile neutropenia in greater than 20% of patients; however current guidelines for using prophylactic growth factors in patients with acute myeloid leukemia warn that use of CSFs following induction therapy may interfere with interpretation of the post-remission bone marrow biopsy results.14
Major Toxicities
Most of the toxicities listed below are presented according to their degree of severity. Higher grades represent more severe toxicities. Although there are several grading systems for cancer chemotherapy toxicities, all are similar. One of the frequently used systems is the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (http:/ctep.info.nih.gov). Oncologists generally do not adjust doses or change therapy for grade 1 or 2 toxicities, but make, or consider making, dosage reductions or therapy changes for grade 3 or 4 toxicities. Incidence values are rounded to the nearest whole percent unless incidence was less than or equal to 0.5%.
-
A.
Cardiovascular: Arrhythmia (grade 3 or 4) 3% to 10%3; edema (grade 3 or 4) 7%3; hypertension (grade 3) 8%,2 (grade 4) 1%2; hypotension (grade 3) 4%, (grade 4) 2%2; myocardial infarction (grade 3 or 4) 3%.3
-
B.
Constitutional: Fatigue (grade 3) 6%.2
-
C.
Gastrointestinal: Anorexia (grade 3 or 4) 14%11; diarrhea 100%,13 (grade 3) 8%,2 grade 3 or 4) 12% to 29%11,13; increased lipase (grade 3) 4%,2 (grade 4) 1%2; mucositis 100%,13 (grade 3 or 4) 13%13; nausea (grade 3 or 4) 3% to 12%.3,11
-
D.
Hematologic: Anemia (grade 3) 11%,2 (grade 3 or 4) 43%,13 (grade 4) 2%2; febrile neutropenia (grade 3) 45%,2 (grade 3 or 4) 41%,11 (grade 3 or 4) 100%,13 (grade 4) 2%2; leukopenia (grade 4) 6%2; neutropenia (grade 3) 1%,2 (grade 3 or 4) 71%,13 (grade 4) 10%2; pancytopenia (grade 3 or 4) 100%3; thrombocytopenia (grade 3) 1%,2 (grade 3 or 4) 57%,13 (grade 4) 15%.2
-
E.
Hepatic: Increased alanine aminotransferase (ALT) 100%,13 (grade 3) 10%,2 (grade 3 or 4) 12% to 57%11,13; increased aspartate aminotransferase (AST) 100%,13 (grade 3) 10%, (grade 3 or 4) 8% to 86%,11,13 (grade 4) 1%2; increased bilirubin 86%,13 (grade 3) 4%,2 (grade 3 or 4) 29%,13 (grade 4) 1%.2
-
F.
Infection: Bacteremia (grade 3) 7%,2 (grade 3 or 4) 57%,13 (grade 4) 2%2; cytomegalovirus (CMV) (grade 3 or 4) 14%13; Clostridium difficile colitis (grade 3 or 4) 14%13; enterococcal bacteremia (grade 3) 7%,2 (grade 4) 1%2; staphylococcal bacteremia (grade 3) 6%2; pneumonia (grade 3) 12%,2 (grade 4) 2%2; sepsis (grade 3) 2%,2 (grade 4) 2%2; unspecified infections and infestations (grade 3 or 4) 47%.11
-
G.
Metabolic: Hyperglycemia (grade 3) 6%,2 (grade 3 or 4) 12%11; hypocalcemia (grade 3) 4%,2 (grade 4) 1%2; hypokalemia (grade 3) 15%,2 (grade 3 or 4) 20%,11 (grade 4) 3%2; hyponatremia (grade 2) 6%.2
-
H.
Neurologic: Palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia 10% to 57%.3,13
- I.
- J.
Pretreatment Laboratory Studies Needed
-
A.Baseline
-
1.AST/ALT
-
2.Total bilirubin
-
3.Serum creatinine
-
4.Complete blood count (CBC) with differential
-
5.Electrocardiogram (EKG)
-
1.
-
B.Prior to Each Treatment
-
1.CBC with differential
-
2.AST/ALT
-
3.Total bilirubin
-
4.Serum creatinine
-
1.
-
C.Recommended Pretreatment Values: The minimally acceptable pretreatment CBC values required to begin a cycle with full dose therapy in the protocols reviewed were:
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
Dosage Modifications
-
A.Renal Function
- 1.
- 2.
- B.
References
- 1.Montogomery J, Shortnacy-Fowler A, Clayton S, et al. Synthesis and biologic activity of 2’-fluoro-2-halo derivatives of 9-beta-D-arabinofuranosyladenine. J Med Chem. 1992;35(2):397–401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Faderl S, Wetzler M, Rizzieri D, et al. Clofarabine plus cytarabine compared with cytarabine alone in older patients with relapsed or refractory acute myelogenous leukemia: Results from the CLASSIC I Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(20): 2492–2499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Agura E, Cooper B, Holmes H, et al. Report of a phase II study of clofarabine and cytarabine in de novo and relapsed and refractory AML patients and in selected elderly patients at high risk for anthracycline toxicity. Oncologist. 2011;16(2):197–206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Faderl S, Verstovsek S, Cortes J, et al. Clofarabine and cytarabine combination as induction therapy for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in patients 50 years of age or older. Blood. 2006;108(1):45–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Faderl S, Ravandi F, Huang X, et al. A randomized study of clofarabine versus clofarabine plus low-dose cytarabine as front-line therapy for patients aged 60 years and older with acute myeloid leukemia and high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome. Blood. 2008;112(5):1638–1645. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Faderl S, Ravandi F, Huang X, et al. Clofarabine plus low-dose cytarabine followed by clofarabine plus low-dose cytarabine alternating with decitabine in acute myeloid leukemia frontline therapy for older patients. Cancer. 2012;118(18):4471–4477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Faderl S, Gandhi V, O’Brien S, et al. Results of a phase 1–2 study of clofarabine in combination with cytarabine (ara-C) in relapsed and refractory acute leukemias. Blood. 2005; 105(3):940–947. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Martínez-Cuadrón D, Montesinos P, Oriol A, et al. Phase II trial to assess the safety and efficacy of clofarabine in combination with low-dose cytarabine in elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Ann Hematol. 2014;93(1):43–46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Becker P, Kantarjian H, Appelbaum F, et al. Clofarabine with high dose cytarabine and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) priming for relapsed and refractory acute myeloid leukaemia. Br J Haematol. 2011;155(2):182–189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Scappini B, Gianfaldoni G, Caracciolo F, et al. Cytarabine and clofarabine after high-dose cytarabine in relapsed or refractory AML patients. Am J Hematol. 2012;87(12):1047–1051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Cooper TM, Alonzo TA, Gerbing RB, et al. AAML0523: A report from the Children’s Oncology Group on the efficacy of clofarabine in combination with cytarabine in pediatric patients with recurrent acute myeloid leukemia. Cancer. 2014;120(16):2482–2489. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Inaba H, Rubnitz JE, Coustan-Smith E, et al. Phase I pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study of the multikinase inhibitor sorafenib in combination with clofarabine and cytarabine in pediatric relapsed/refractory leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(24):3293–3300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Martin MG, Uy GL, Procknow E, et al. Allo-SCT conditioning for myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia with clofarabine, cytarabine and ATG. Bone Marrow Transpl. 2009;44(1):13–17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines – Acute Myeloid Leukemia. V.1.2015. http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/aml.pdf Accessed August31, 2015. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 15.Hesketh PJ, Kris MG, Grunberg SM. et al. Proposal for classifying the acute emetogenicity of cancer chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 1997;15(1):103–109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines – Antiemesis. V.1.2015. http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/antiemesis.pdf Accessed August31, 2015.
- 17.American Society of Clinical Oncology. Antiemetics: ASCO Clinical Practice Guideline Update. http://www.asco.org/institute-quality/antiemetics-asco-clinical-practice-guideline-update Accessed August31, 2015
- 18.Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer. Antiemetic guidelines. 2013. http://www.mascc.org/assets/documents/mascc_guidelines_english_2013.pdf Accessed August31, 2015.
- 19.Geling O, Eichler HG. Should 5-Hydroxytryptamine-3 receptor antagonists be administered beyond 24 hours after chemotherapy to prevent delayed emesis? Systematic re-evaluation of clinical evidence and drug cost implications. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(6):1289–1294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Terrey JP, Aapro MS. The activity of granisetron in patients who had previously failed ondansetron antiemetic therapy. Eur J Clin Res. 1996;8:281–288. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Carmichael J, Keizer HJ, Cupissol D, Milliez J, Scheidel P, Schindler AE. Use of granisetron in patients refractory to previous treatment with antiemetics. Anticancer Drugs. 1998;9(5):381–385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.de Wit R, de Boer AC, vd Linden GH, Stoter G, Sparreboom A, Verweij J. Effective cross-over to granisetron after failure to ondansetron, a randomized double blind study in patients failing ondansetron plus dexamethasone during the first 24 hours following highly emetogenic chemotherapy. Br J Cancer. 2001;19;85(8):1099–1101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Smith IE. A dose-finding study of granisetron, a novel antiemetic, in patients receiving cytostatic chemotherapy. The Granisetron Study Group. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 1993;119(6):350–354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Soukop M. A dose-finding study of granisetron, a novel antiemetic, in patients receiving high-dose cisplatin. Granisetron Study Group. Support Care Cancer. 1994;2(3):177–183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Smith TJ, Bohlke Kari, Lyman GH, et al. Recommendations for the use of white blood cell growth factors: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline update. http://jco.ascopubs.org/content/early/2015/07/08/JCO.2015.62.3488 Accessed August31, 2015. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 26.NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology – Myeloid Growth Factors. V.1.2015. http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/myeloid_growth.pdf Accessed August31, 2015.
- 27.Clofarabine [package insert]. Bridgewater, NJ: sanofiaventis US: 2014. http://products.sanofi.us/clolar/clolar.html Accessed August31, 2015.
- 28.Bonate PL, Cunningham CC, Gaynon P, et al. Population pharmacokinetics of clofarabine and its metabolite 6- ketoclofarabine in adult and pediatric patients with cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2011;67(4):875–890. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Kintzel PE, Dorr RT. Anticancer drug renal toxicity and elimination: Dosing guidelines for altered renal function. Cancer Treat Rev. 1995;21(1):33–64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Cytarabine [package insert]. Lake Forest, IL: Hospira US; 2015. http://www.hospira.com/en/images/EN-3742_tcm81–90613.pdf Accessed August31, 2015.
- 31.Aronoff GR, Bennett WM, Berns JS, et al. Drug Prescribing in Renal Failure. 5th ed. Philadelphia: American College of Physicians; 2007. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Koren G, Beatty K, Seto A, et al. The effects of impaired liver function on the elimination of antineoplastic agents. Ann Pharmacother. 1992;26(3):363–371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Floyd J, Mirza I, Sachs, Perry MC. Hepatotoxicity of chemotherapy. Semin Oncol. 2006;33:50–67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.King PD. Perry MC. Hepatotoxicity of chemotherapy. Oncologist. 2001;6(2):162–176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
