Skip to main content
Genome Announcements logoLink to Genome Announcements
. 2016 Feb 11;4(1):e01715-15. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.01715-15

Draft Genome Sequences of the Turfgrass Pathogen Sclerotinia homoeocarpa

Robert Green a, Hyunkyu Sang a, Taehyun Chang b, Elisha Allan-Perkins a, Elsa Petit a, Geunhwa Jung a,
PMCID: PMC4751324  PMID: 26868400

Abstract

Sclerotinia homoeocarpa (F. T. Bennett) is one of the most economically important pathogens on high-amenity cool-season turfgrasses, where it causes dollar spot. To understand the genetic mechanisms of fungicide resistance, which has become highly prevalent, the whole genomes of two isolates with varied resistance levels to fungicides were sequenced.

GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT

Sclerotinia homoeocarpa, the causal agent of dollar spot disease, is the most economically important cool-season turfgrass pathogen. This sterile ascomycete fungus has developed cross-resistance and multiple resistance to the demethylation inhibitor (DMI), methyl benzimidazole carbamates (MBC), and dicarboximide fungicide classes (14). Two isolates of S. homoeocarpa, HRS10 and HRI11, were collected from individual symptomatic leaf blades of creeping bentgrass (Agrostis stolonifera) in 2009 (5). HRI11 displays resistance to DMI fungicides and other chemically unrelated fungicide classes, while HRS10 is sensitive to all fungicide classes (6, 7).

The isolates were preserved on oat seeds (Avena sativa L.), according to methods described previously (8). Both isolates were transferred to potato dextrose agar (Difco Laboratories, Detroit, MI), subcultured after 4 days onto potato dextrose broth, and grown for an additional 4 days. Mycelia were freeze-dried using a lyophilizer (Labconco, Kansas City, MO), and the total genomic DNA was extracted using a modified cetyltrimethylammonium bromide method (9).

Libraries were made using a combination of PacBio CLR reads with 20-kb inserts at the High-Throughput Sequencing Facility (HTSF) at North Carolina University, USA, and 2 × 100 Illumina HiSeq reads (Macrogen, Seoul, South Korea). Over 38,000,000 Illumina HiSeq and 1,420,000 PacBio CLR reads were generated for each isolate. The Illumina reads were polished using default parameters with Trimmomatic (10). De novo assembly was performed using SPAdes version 3.6.1 (11), with k-mer lengths of 33, 55, and 77. Contigs >5,000 bp and PacBio CLR reads were used for scaffolding with SSPACE-LongRead (12). Scaffolding upgraded the HRS10 draft genome to 231 scaffolds and a total length of 42,266,283 bp (N50, 600,417 bp), with a largest scaffold of 1,672,908 bp and a G+C content of 43.35%. The HRI11 assembly was upgraded to 257 scaffolds and a total length of 43,359,131 bp (N50, 709,078 bp), with a largest scaffold of 1,993,158 bp and a G+C content of 43.83%.

Repeats were masked using RepeatMasker and the fungal repetitive elements database from Repbase (13). A total of 1,272,222 bp were masked in HRS10 (3.01%), and 1,353,753 bp were masked in HRI11 (3.12%). Using the masked genomes, 12,216 and 12,912 proteins were annotated for HRS10 and HRI11, respectively, using RNA transcripts from S. homoeocarpa (6) as cDNA hits with Augustus (14).

Previous reports (6, 7) have revealed multiple mechanisms of fungicide resistance conferred in isolates HRS10 and HRI11. ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters have been shown to be upregulated in the absence and presence of fungicides and contribute to insensitivity to multiple fungicidal classes. Moreover, zinc finger proteins and other transcription factors play a potential role in the detoxification of xenobiotic substances in S. homoeocarpa (6). These transcription factors and their DNA-binding domains can now be searched on a genome-wide level for comparisons between HRS10 and HRI11.

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.

This whole-genome shotgun project has been deposited in GenBank under the accession no. LNGN00000000 for HRS10 and no. LNKV00000000 for HRI11. The versions described in this paper are the first versions, LNGN01000000 and LNKV01000000, respectively.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Macrogen (Seoul, South Korea) and the HTSF (North Carolina University, USA) for generating all of the DNA sequences presented here.

Funding Statement

Funding was provided by an honors research grant from the Commonwealth Honors College at UMass Amherst.

This material is based upon work supported by the National Institute of Food and Agriculture, U.S. Department of Agriculture, the Massachusetts Agricultural Experiment Station, and the Stockbridge School of Agriculture at the University of Massachusetts Amherst, under project no. MAS00436.

The content of this paper is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the USDA or NIFA. The funders had no role in the study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Footnotes

Citation Green R, Sang H, Chang T, Allan-Perkins E, Petit E, Jung G. 2016. Draft genome sequences of the turfgrass pathogen Sclerotinia homoeocarpa. Genome Announc 4(1):e01715-15. doi:10.1128/genomeA.01715-15.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Detweiler AR, Vargas J, Danneberger T. 1983. Resistance of Sclerotinia homoeocarpa to iprodione and benomyl. Plant Dis 67:627–630. doi: 10.1094/PD-67-627. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bishop P, Sorochan J, Ownley BH, Samples TJ, Windham AS, Windham MT, Trigiano RN. 2008. Resistance of Sclerotinia homoeocarpa to iprodione, propiconazole, and thiophanate-methyl in Tennessee and northern Mississippi. Crop Sci 48:1615–1620. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Koch PL, Grau CR, Jo YK, Jung G. 2009. Thiophanate-methyl and propiconazole sensitivity in Sclerotinia homoeocarpa populations from golf courses in Wisconsin and Massachusetts. Plant Dis 93:100–105. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-93-1-0100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Putman AI, Jung G, Kaminski JE. 2010. Geographic distribution of fungicide-insensitive Sclerotinia homoeocarpa isolates from golf courses in the northeastern United States. Plant Dis 94:186–195. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-94-2-0186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Popko JT, Ok CH, Campbell-Nelson K, Jung G. 2012. The association between in vitro propiconazole sensitivity and field efficacy of five New England Sclerotinia homoeocarpa populations. Plant Dis 96:552–561. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-06-11-0524. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hulvey J, Popko JT, Sang H, Berg A, Jung G. 2012. Overexpression of ShCYP51B and ShatrD in Sclerotinia homoeocarpa isolates exhibiting practical field resistance to a demethylation inhibitor fungicide. Appl Environ Microbiol 78:6674–6682. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00417-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Sang H, Hulvey J, Popko JT, Lopes J, Swaminathan A, Chang T, Jung G. 2015. A pleiotropic drug resistance transporter is involved in reduced sensitivity to multiple fungicide classes in Sclerotinia homoeocarpa (F. T. Bennett). Mol Plant Pathol 16:251–261. doi: 10.1111/mpp.12174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Chakraborty N, Chang T, Casler MD, Jung G. 2006. Response of bentgrass cultivars to Sclerotinia homoeocarpa isolates representing 10 vegetative compatibility groups. Crop Sci 46:1237–1244. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Cubero OF, Crespo A, Fatehi J, Bridge PD. 1999. DNA extraction and PCR amplification method suitable for fresh, herbarium-stored, lichenized, and other fungi. Plant Syst Evol 216:243–249. doi: 10.1007/BF01084401. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. 2014. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30:2114–2120. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, Lesin VM, Nikolenko SI, Pham S, Prjibelski AD, Pyshkin AV, Sirotkin AV, Vyahhi N, Tesler G, Alekseyev MA, Pevzner PA. 2012. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 19:455–477. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2012.0021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Boetzer M, Pirovano W. 2014. SSPACE-LongRead: scaffolding bacterial draft genomes using long read sequence information. BMC Bioinformatics 15:211. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-15-211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Jurka J, Kapitonov VV, Pavlicek A, Klonowski P, Kohany O, Walichiewicz J. 2005. Repbase update, a database of eukaryotic repetitive elements. Cytogenet Genome Res 110:462–467. doi: 10.1159/000084979. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Stanke M, Morgenstern B. 2005. Augustus: a Web server for gene prediction in eukaryotes that allows user-defined constraints. Nucleic Acids Res 33:W465–W467. doi: 10.1093/nar/gki458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genome Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES