Abstract
Osteoclasts are specialized polyploid cells that resorb bone. Upon stimulation with receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand (RANKL), myeloid precursors commit to becoming polyploid, largely via cell fusion. Polyploidization of osteoclasts is necessary for their bone-resorbing activity, but the mechanisms by which polyploidization is controlled remain to be determined. Here, we demonstrated that in addition to cell fusion, incomplete cytokinesis also plays a role in osteoclast polyploidization. In in vitro cultured osteoclasts derived from mice expressing the fluorescent ubiquitin-based cell cycle indicator (Fucci), RANKL induced polyploidy by incomplete cytokinesis as well as cell fusion. Polyploid cells generated by incomplete cytokinesis had the potential to subsequently undergo cell fusion. Nuclear polyploidy was also observed in osteoclasts in vivo, suggesting the involvement of incomplete cytokinesis in physiological polyploidization. Furthermore, RANKL-induced incomplete cytokinesis was reduced by inhibition of Akt, resulting in impaired multinucleated osteoclast formation. Taken together, these results reveal that RANKL-induced incomplete cytokinesis contributes to polyploidization of osteoclasts via Akt activation.
Keywords: cell biology, cell division, cell proliferation, flow cytometry, imaging, osteoclast, incomplete cytokinesis, polyploidy
Introduction
Polyploidy, in which a cell has more than the diploid complement of chromosomes, is a widespread physiological phenomenon observed especially in plants, fungi, and insects (1). Although it is less common in mammals, polyploidization occurs in selected tissues, including the placenta, liver, heart, skeletal muscle, and bone marrow during normal development and aging (2). During developmental programs, cells obtain additional sets of chromosomes by various mechanisms, including endocycles, endomitosis, incomplete cytokinesis, and cell fusion. In endocycles and endomitosis, the cell undergoes successive rounds of DNA replication without intervening mitosis or karyokinesis (abort mitosis during metaphase). These cycles do not produce two nuclei in the cell. The best-studied examples of endocycles and endomitosis are trophoblast giant cells and megakaryocytes, respectively (3–6). In incomplete cytokinesis, the cell undergoes karyokinesis but skips cytokinesis, resulting in a cell with two nuclei; this process has been implicated in the normal development of hepatocytes and cardiomyocytes (7, 8). Cell fusion, which involves merging of the plasma membrane and cytoplasmic mixing, is observed during development of skeletal muscle cells and osteoclasts (9, 10). Endocycles, endomitosis, and incomplete cytokinesis are directly associated with the proliferative state of the cell. By contrast, cell fusion is entirely independent of cell proliferation (10).
Polyploidy is a hallmark of mature osteoclasts, which are specialized multinucleated giant cells that resorb bone (11). These cells are hematopoietic in origin and are derived from myeloid precursors that also give rise to macrophages and dendritic cells. When myeloid precursors receive signals mediated by the osteoclast differentiation factor RANKL,3 which is mainly produced by osteoblasts, they commit to becoming pre-osteoclasts and ultimately differentiate into multinucleated osteoclasts (12). The importance of polyploidization in osteoclast formation is demonstrated by the impaired bone-resorbing activity of osteoclasts that cannot achieve polyploidy (13).
Although generation of polyploid osteoclasts is thought to occur due to cell fusion, independently of cell proliferation (14), some researchers have pointed out a relationship between cell proliferation and osteoclast differentiation. For example, in osteoclast progenitors, progression and subsequent withdrawal from the cell cycle are required for differentiation into osteoclasts (15–17). In addition, stimulation with RANKL also triggers a signaling pathway that is essential for cell cycle progression (18). These reports prompted us to investigate whether cell cycle progression has an impact on polyploidization during osteoclastogenesis and, if so, how and to what extent the cell cycle regulates the polyploidization of osteoclasts. The fluorescent ubiquitination-based cell cycle indicator (Fucci) is a powerful tool for studying coordination of the cell cycle with other developmental processes (19–22). The Fucci probe was generated by fusing red fluorescent protein and green fluorescent protein to human Cdt1 and human geminin, respectively. These two chimeric proteins accumulate reciprocally in the nuclei during the cell cycle, labeling the nuclei of cells in G0/G1 phase red and those in S/G2/M phase green. Thus, these proteins function as effective G0/G1 and S/G2/M markers.
Here, using monocytes derived from Fucci transgenic mice, we show that RANKL-induced polyploidization occurs not only by cell fusion but also by incomplete cytokinesis. In these cells, RANKL stimulation transiently increased basal proliferation and induced incomplete cytokinesis as well as cell fusion. Also, cells that underwent incomplete cytokinesis had the potential to undergo cell fusion. In addition, fluorescence in situ hybridization revealed that some of osteoclasts exhibited nuclear polyploidy (i.e. they contained nuclei with more than the diploid complement of chromosomes (>2N)) in vivo, suggesting that cells that undergo incomplete cytokinesis are involved in physiological polyploidization of osteoclasts. Furthermore, RANKL stimulation induced phosphorylation of Akt, which is required for efficient polyploidization by either incomplete cytokinesis or cell fusion. Collectively, our findings reveal an unexpected pattern of cell division and fusion during the generation of polyploid osteoclasts.
Experimental Procedures
Mice
Fucci transgenic mouse lines FucciS/G2/M-#474 and FucciG1-#639 were obtained from the RIKEN BioResource Center. These lines were cross-bred to obtain Fucci double-transgenic mice. The generation of TRAP promoter-tdTomato transgenic mice and V-type H+-ATPase a3 subunit-GFP fusion protein expressing mice (a3-GFP) were described previously (23). All animal work was performed under veterinary supervision in an accredited facility using protocols approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University.
In Vitro Osteoclast and Multinucleated Giant Cell Differentiation
Bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMMs) from wild type (WT) or Fucci double-transgenic (dTg) mice were obtained from cultures of bone marrow collected from 6- to 8-week-old male tibias and femurs, as described previously. In brief, bone marrow progenitor cells were cultured with M-CSF (60 ng/ml) in α-minimal essential medium containing 10% FCS. After 3–4 days, cells were gathered as BMMs. For osteoclast differentiation, BMMs were cultured for 3 days in α-minimal essential medium containing M-CSF (60 ng/ml) and RANKL (150 ng/ml). After culture for 3 days, the cells were fixed with 3.7% formaldehyde in PBS for 10 min and then stained for TRAP using the acid phosphatase, leukocyte (TRAP) kit (Sigma). TRAP-positive multinucleated cells containing three or more nuclei were counted. For differentiation of multinucleated giant cells (MGCs), BMMs derived from wild type mice were cultured in the presence of IL-3 (100 ng/ml) (R&D Systems) and IL-4 (100 ng/ml) (PeproTech) for 2 days. MGCs were stained with May-Grunewald Giemsa stain (Life Technologies, Inc.). For inhibitor assays, BMMs were cultured with M-CSF (60 ng/ml) and RANKL (150 ng/ml) or with IL-4 (100 ng/ml) plus IL-3 (100 ng/ml) in the presence of Y27632 (10 μm) (Wako), Akt inhibitor VIII (5 μm) (Sigma), SN50 (50 μg/ml) (BioVision), LY294003 (5 μm) (Wako), aphidicolin (500 nm) (Sigma), or DMSO for 72 h.
BrdU Incorporation Assay
Wild Type-BMMs were cultured with M-CSF (60 ng/ml) in the presence or absence of RANKL (150 ng/ml) or cultured with IL-4 (10 ng/ml) plus IL-3 (100 ng/ml) for the indicated amount of time (in hours). BrdU (10 μm) were added to the culture for the last 6 h. After culture, cells were washed with PBS and detached using enzyme-free cell dissociation buffer (Millipore) at 37 °C for 5 min. After generation of single-cell suspensions, cells were counted and suspended at 1 × 106/ml in PBS in polystyrene tubes. The cells were stained with LIVE/DEAD Aqua (Life Technologies, Inc.) for 30 min on ice to exclude dead cells. Cells were washed with PBS with 2% FCS and fixed with BrdU fixation buffer (eBioscience) for 1 h on ice followed by DNase treatment. Cells were stained with FITC-labeled anti-BrdU antibody (clone Bu20a, eBioscience) for 20 min, and after washing, cells were further stained with 7-AAD. Finally, the cells were analyzed using a FACSCanto II (BD Biosciences). Numbers indicate the percentages of S phase cells. Results are representative of three independent experiments.
Ploidy Analysis
dTg-BMMs stimulated with RANKL for the indicated times in the presence of M-CSF were washed with PBS and detached using enzyme-free cell dissociation buffer (Millipore) at 37 °C for 5 min. After generation of single-cell suspensions, cells were counted and suspended at 1 × 106/ml in phenol red-free α-minimal essential medium containing 2% FCS and 2 mm EDTA in polystyrene tubes. Then the cells were stained with 5 μm Vybrant DyeCycle Violet (Life Technologies, Inc.) at 37 °C for 60 min. Finally, the cells were stained with TO-PRO-3 (Life Technologies, Inc.) to exclude dead cells and analyzed using an LSR (BD Biosciences). Excitation laser lines and emission filters were as follows: Vybrant DyeCycle Violet: excitation, 405-nm laser line, and emission, 450/50 BP; mAG: excitation, 488-nm laser line, and emission, 515/20 BP;mKO2: excitation, 532-nm laser line, and emission, 585/42 BP; TO-PRO-3: excitation, 640-nm laser line, and emission, 660/20 BP. Data were analyzed using the FlowJo software (Tree Star).
Time-lapse Microscopy and Analysis
dTg-BMMs cultured in a glass-bottom dish were stimulated with RANKL (150 ng/ml) in the presence of M-CSF (60 ng/ml) or stimulated with IL-4 (100 ng/ml) and IL-3 (100 ng/ml) for the indicated times, and then subjected to time lapse imaging. Cell-tracking experiments were performed using a Deltavision microscope (Applied Precision) from an Olympus IX70 microscope equipped with a ×20 or ×40 objective, 300-watt xenon lamp, and a Photometrics CoolSNAP HQ 12-bit monochrome-cooled CCD camera. A series of images was collected every 5 min at 37 °C. To acquire large square fields of view, multipoint time-lapse imaging was performed. Image acquisition and processing were performed using the Deltavision SoftWorx software (Applied Precision), and image analysis was performed using the Fiji software (National Institutes of Health). Cells were manually tracked. Mononucleated cell fusion was counted as “cell fusion.” Mononucleated or binucleated cells that went through cell fusion following incomplete cytokinesis, or daughter cells of a binucleated cell that underwent cell fusion, were counted as “cell fusion involving incomplete cytokinesis.” Doubling times of cytokinesis/incomplete cytokinesis were assessed using a Nikon BioStation IMQ imaging system, and image analysis was performed using the Imaris software (Bitplane). The time from the end of cytokinesis/incomplete cytokinesis to the next end of cytokinesis/incomplete cytokinesis was measured as the doubling time. Final graphs were generated using GraphPad Prism (GraphPad Software).
Flow Cytometry
dTg-BMMs cultured with M-CSF (60 ng/ml) in the presence or absence of RANKL (150 ng/ml) for 48 h were washed with PBS and detached using enzyme-free cell dissociation buffer (Millipore) at 37 °C for 5 min. After generation of single-cell suspensions, cells were counted and suspended at 1 × 106/ml in PBS in polystyrene tubes. Cells were stained with 1 μm LIVE/DEAD NearIR (Life Technologies, Inc.) on ice for 30 min to exclude dead cells, washed with PBS with 2% FCS, and stained with allophycocyanin-labeled antibodies against integrin β3 or F4/80 (integrin β3, clone 2C9.G3; F4/80, clone MB8 (eBioscience)) on ice for 30 min. After washing, cells were further stained with 5 μm Vybrant DyeCycle Violet (Life Technologies, Inc.) at 37 °C for 60 min. A Fucci transgenic mouse line FucciG1-#610 obtained from the RIKEN BioResource Center and a3-GFP mice line were cross-bred to obtain Fucci-mKO2 and a3-GFP expressing mice (Fucci-mKO2/a3-GFP). BMMs were prepared from Fucci-mKO2/a3-GFP mice and cultured with M-CSF (60 ng/ml) in the presence or absence of RANKL (150 ng/ml) for the indicated times. After generation of single-cell suspensions, cells were stained with 5 μm Vybrant DyeCycle Violet (Life Technologies, Inc.) at 37 °C for 60 min. Finally, the cells were stained with TO-PRO-3 (Life Technologies, Inc.) to exclude dead cells. Peripheral blood cells or bone marrow cells of Fucci-mAG transgenic mice were stained with allophycocyanin-labeled antibodies against Ly6C (clone HK1.4 (eBioscience)) on ice for 30 min. After washing, cells were further stained with 5 μm Vybrant DyeCycle Violet (Life Technologies, Inc.) at 37 °C for 60 min. Finally, the cells were stained with 7-AAD (eBioscience) to exclude dead cells. Cells were analyzed using LSR (BD Biosciences), and data were analyzed using the FlowJo software (Tree Star).
Gelatin Degradation Assay
Fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) gelatin-coated glass bottom dishes were prepared as described previously (24). dTg-BMMs were cultured on the FITC gelatin-coated dishes for 24 h with M-CSF (60 ng/ml) and RANKL (150 ng/ml) and then subjected to time-lapse imaging using a confocal A1 microscope system (Nikon). A series of images was collected every 30 min at 37 °C. Image analysis was performed using NIS-elements software (Nikon).
Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization
TRAP promoter-tdTomato transgenic mice were perfused with 4% paraformaldehyde plus sucrose for fixation, and bone tissues were further fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde plus sucrose for 3 h at 4 °C. Next, the bones were incubated with 10% EDTA for 2 weeks for decalcification and embedded in O.C.T. compound (Tissue-Tek). Sections 5 μm thick were prepared using Kawamoto's film method and treated with pepsin, and then FISH probe mixture was added. The sections were denatured at 90 °C for 10 min and then kept overnight at 37 °C for hybridization. After hybridization, the sections were washed with 5% formamide, 2× SSC for 20 min at 37 °C, and then 1× SSC for 10 min at room temperature. After washing, the sections were stained with DAPI, and images were acquired using the Leica CW-4000 system (Leica) with a ×100 objective.
Western Blotting
After treatment of cells with the indicated cytokines or inhibitors for the indicated times, cells were washed twice with ice-cold PBS and scraped from the plastic plate with a cell lifter (Costar), and then whole-cell lysates were isolated in RIPA buffer (1% Nonidet P-40, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS, 25 mm Tris-HCl, pH 7.6, 150 mm NaCl) supplemented with protease inhibitor mixture and PhosSTOP (Roche Applied Science). Equivalent amounts of protein (20–40 μg) were subjected to 10% SDS-PAGE, and immunoblotting was performed using antibodies specific for phospho-Akt (Ser-473), Akt, phospho-p38 MAPK (Thr-180/Tyr-182), p38, phospho-p44/42 MAPK (ERK1/2) (Thr-202/Tyr-204), ERK1/2, JNK (Cell Signaling), and phospho-JNK (Thr-183/Tyr-185) (BD Biosciences). For RhoA activation assay, cell lysates were incubated with Rhotekin-RBD protein beads and blotted with anti-RhoA mAb (Cytoskeleton).
Statistical Analysis
Data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance or unpaired t test with Welch's correction and are presented as means ± S.D. A p value < 0.05 was considered significant.
Results
RANKL Stimulation Increases Basal Proliferation of BMMs
To determine the impact of RANKL stimulation on the cell cycle during osteoclast development, we first examined the proportions of cells in the G1 and S/G2/M phases during RANKL-induced osteoclast differentiation. Fucci double-transgenic mouse-derived bone marrow monocytes (dTg-BMMs) were stimulated with or without RANKL in the presence of M-CSF, and the proportions of the cells positive for green fluorescence (S/G2/M phase) and red fluorescence (G1 phase) were measured by flow cytometry. The proportion of green cells increased 24 h after RANKL stimulation, but this increase disappeared 48 h after stimulation (Fig. 1, A and B). M-CSF alone did not significantly influence the proportion of green or red cells during this period (Fig. 1, A and B). These results suggested that RANKL stimulation transiently promotes cell cycle progression. The increase in cell cycle progression was confirmed by BrdU incorporation assay (Fig. 1C). Using time-lapse imaging, we measured the doubling time of dTg-BMMs cultured with M-CSF in the presence or absence of RANKL for 48 h. RANKL significantly reduced doubling time in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 1D), along with increasing formation of multinucleated osteoclasts (Fig. 1E). These results support the idea that RANKL stimulation increases the basal proliferation of dTg-BMMs.
RANKL Stimulation Induces Polyploid Cells Not Only by Cell Fusion but Also by Incomplete Cytokinesis
We next performed ploidy analysis during osteoclast formation. dTg-BMMs were stimulated with RANKL for the indicated times in the presence of M-CSF, and ploidy was analyzed by flow cytometry (Fig. 2). As expected, stimulation with RANKL induced generation of polyploid cells (red fluorescence-positive 4C, 6C, 8C, and >10C) (Fig. 2). Among these polyploid cells, 4C and 8C cells were detected first after RANKL stimulation for 24 h (Fig. 2). By contrast, 6C cells were not detected until 48 h after the onset of RANKL stimulation, and 6C cells were less common than 8C cells (Fig. 2 and Table 1).
TABLE 1.
2C | 4C | 6C | 8C | >10C | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Monocytes | 98.32 | 1.00 | |||
Monocytes | 97.93 | 1.20 | 0.03 | ||
Monocytes | 94.25 | 3.89 | |||
Monocytes | 92.42 | 5.36 | 0.04 | 0.08 | |
Monocytes | 93.39 | 4.11 | 0.09 | 0.09 | |
OC (day2) | 84.77 | 12.94 | 0.25 | 0.49 | 0.02 |
OC (day2) | 83.17 | 13.04 | 0.17 | 0.73 | |
OC (day2) | 77.27 | 16.02 | 0.66 | 1.27 | |
OC (day3) | 77.92 | 13.10 | 1.32 | 1.47 | 1.61 |
OC (day3) | 81.81 | 13.80 | 0.59 | 1.13 |
To examine how these polyploid cells were generated, we performed time-lapse imaging. In these experiments, dTg-BMMs were stimulated by RANKL for various times (1–16 h) in the presence of M-CSF, and then cell cycle progression and polyploidization were observed by time-lapse imaging. Regardless of the period of RANKL stimulation, almost all cells were mononucleated at the beginning of imaging. No cell fusion was observed within 24 h, but fusion was observed at and after 36 h of RANKL stimulation (average time of the beginning of fusion was 50.5 ± 5.63 h; Fig. 3A). The majority of cells that went through cell fusion were red fluorescence-positive mononucleated cells (Fig. 3B and Table 2), and the resultant fused cells rarely went through mitosis (Table 2). Instead, they continued to undergo cell fusion, and finally became large multinucleated osteoclast-like cells with red nuclei. These observations suggested that 4C and 8C cells detected after 24 h of RANKL stimulation were not fusion products. Unexpectedly, incomplete cytokinesis was observed during this period (Fig. 4A and supplemental Movie 1). The incomplete cytokinesis resulted in formation of 4C binucleated cells (Fig. 4A). Some of these cells re-entered mitosis but failed to complete cytokinesis, resulting in formation of binucleated 8C cells (Fig. 4A). Consistent with this, after RANKL stimulation for 24 h, flow cytometric analysis detected S/G2/M phase cells between the 4C and 8C peaks (Fig. 2), consistent with the observation that some of the tetraploid cells re-entered the cell cycle. Together, these observations suggested that 4C and 8C cells detected at 24 h after RANKL stimulation resulted from incomplete cytokinesis.
TABLE 2.
Event | Fusion combination |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
mKO2 (DN) × mKO2 (DN) | mKO2 (DN) × mAG | mAG × mAG | Total no. (%) | |
Cell fusion | 132 | 12 | 1 | 145 |
Cell fusion involving incomplete cytokinesis | 16 | 0 | 0 | 16 (11.0) |
Cytokinesis after fusion | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 (0.69) |
Cells That Undergo Incomplete Cytokinesis Have the Potential for Cell Fusion
Because generation of polyploidy by incomplete cytokinesis has been observed in certain pathological contexts (25, 26), we speculated that cells that undergo incomplete cytokinesis might merely be abnormal, rather than critical intermediates in the formation of mature osteoclasts. To address this issue, we continued time-lapse imaging to trace the fates of cells that underwent incomplete cytokinesis. Cell-tracking analysis revealed that binucleated cells generated by incomplete cytokinesis could undergo cell fusion (Fig. 5A and supplemental Movie 2). Indeed, 11% of fused cells had previously undergone incomplete cytokinesis (Table 2). These results indicated that such cells had the potential to undergo cell fusion during RANKL-induced osteoclast formation.
Some of the binucleated cells generated by incomplete cytokinesis ultimately succeeded in undergoing cytokinesis and formed mononucleated polyploid cells (Fig. 4B and supplemental Movie 3). These mononucleated polyploid cells also had the potential to undergo cell fusion (Fig. 5B and supplemental Movie 4). Notably, ∼50% of 4C cells sorted from dTg-BMMs cultured with RANKL for 66 h were mononucleated.4 These observations strongly suggested that mononucleated cells involved in cell fusion consisted of both 2C and polyploid cells. During time-lapse imaging, target cells often migrated away from the field of view. In this case, the fate of the target cells could not be traced, and consequently those cells were uncounted. Thus, the observed percentage of cell fusion involving cells that undergo incomplete cytokinesis might represent an underestimate. Collectively, these results revealed that polyploid cells detected after RANKL stimulation for more than 48 h consisted not only of fusion products but also of cells that underwent incomplete cytokinesis.
Characterization of Cells That Undergo Incomplete Cytokinesis
To understand the phenotype of cells that had undergone incomplete cytokinesis, we first examined the expression profiles of integrin β3, F4/80, and V-type H+-ATPase a3 subunit in RANKL-stimulated BMMs. Integrin β3 is an important cell adhesion molecule that plays an important role in osteoclast biology (27), and F4/80 is a macrophage marker that is barely expressed on osteoclasts (28). Expression of both integrin β3 and F4/80 was detected on dTg-BMMs and changed after 48 h of stimulation with RANKL (Fig. 6A). We separated dTg-BMMs into four groups depending on their cell cycle phase and DNA content as follows: (i) mononucleated cells (G1 ×2C); (ii) cells in S phase (S); (iii) cells that underwent incomplete cytokinesis or were generated by cell fusion (G1 ×4C, G1 × 8C), and (iv) cells that underwent incomplete cytokinesis and re-entered S phase (S (re-enter)) (Fig. 6B). The expression of integrin β3 and F4/80 was examined in each of these groups. Flow cytometry analysis revealed that the expression levels of these molecules were approximately the same in all four groups (Fig. 6B), suggesting that the expression of integrin β3 and F4/80 was not affected by incomplete cytokinesis.
V-type H+-ATPase a3 subunit is a protein complex that mediates H+ transport into the resorption lacunae. Lack of a3 subunit results in severe osteopetrosis due to impaired osteoclast bone-resorbing function (29). BMMs derived from Fucci-mKO2 and a3-GFP-expressing mice (Fucci-mKO2/a3-GFP-BMMs) were cultured with M-CSF and RANKL for the indicated times, and the expression of a3-GFP was analyzed by flow cytometry. The expression of a3-GFP gradually increased with time (Fig. 6C) and was detected in diploids (G1 × 2C), polyploids (G1 × 4C, G1 × 6C, and G1 × 8C), and cells that underwent incomplete cytokinesis and re-entered S phase (S (re-enter)) (Fig. 6D). These results suggested that the expression of a3-GFP was not affected by incomplete cytokinesis.
We next examined resorption activities of cells that had undergone incomplete cytokinesis. dTg-BMMs were cultured on FITC-labeled gelatin-coated dishes in the presence of M-CSF and RANKL for 24 h, and then time-lapse imaging was performed. Resorption activity can be observed as degradation of the gelatin. Majority of cells that degraded FITC gelatin were in red (81.0%; Fig. 6E). In contrast, green+ binucleated cells (i.e. the cells that underwent incomplete cytokinesis and re-entered S phase) barely degraded FITC gelatin (Fig. 6E and supplemental movie 5). These results suggested that cells that had undergone incomplete cytokinesis and re-entered S phase had lower resorption capacity than cells in G1 phase.
Cells That Undergo Incomplete Cytokinesis Are Involved in Formation of Multinucleated Osteoclasts in Vivo
To determine whether incomplete cytokinesis plays a physiologically relevant role in development of multinucleated osteoclasts, we performed two experiments. First, we examined the ploidy of osteoclasts in vivo. Fusion of cells that had previously undergone incomplete cytokinesis would result in some osteoclasts exhibiting nuclear polyploidy (i.e. containing nuclei with more than the diploid complement of chromosomes) (Fig. 7A, panel a). In transgenic mice in which tdTomato, a red fluorescent protein, is expressed under the control of the TRAP promoter, osteoclasts are labeled with tdTomato. We analyzed the ploidy profiles of osteoclasts in the long bone of TRAP-tdTomato transgenic mice by fluorescence in situ hybridization. In tdTomato+ osteoclasts, some nuclei had the diploid complement of chromosomes (2N), whereas others had more than the diploid complement (>2N) (Fig. 7A, panels b–h).
Next, we examined the existence of osteoclast precursors that had undergone incomplete cytokinesis in vivo by flow cytometry. Because Ly6C is reported as one of markers of osteoclast precursors (30), and osteoclast precursors are circulating in the periphery (31), we tried to detect Ly6C+ G1 × 4C cells in the peripheral blood. In the peripheral blood of Fucci-mAG transgenic mice, green+ cells were barely detected. In green− (G1 phase) cells, Ly6C+ 4C cells were detected (average percentage was 0.07 ± 0.03%; Fig. 7B). These results indicated that almost all circulating cells were in G1 phase under physiological conditions, and G1 × 4C osteoclast precursors could be detected in the periphery. Although we cannot exclude the possibility that the cells were binucleated fusion products, this observation may support in some part the idea that incomplete cytokinesis occurs in vivo. These results suggested that fusion of cells that undergo incomplete cytokinesis occurs in vivo and that incomplete cytokinesis contributes to physiological development of multinucleated osteoclasts.
Fusion of Cells That Undergo Incomplete Cytokinesis Occurs during Formation of Osteoclasts but Not MGCs
Next, we examined the involvement of incomplete cytokinesis in formation of MGCs (32, 33). MGCs are formed by cell fusion of macrophages in response to foreign bodies at the site of implantation, and they can be formed in vitro from monocytes following stimulation with combinations of cytokines such as IL-4 and IL-3. Various common molecules (e.g. DC-STAMP, OC-STAMP, and Atp6v0d2) are required for polyploidization of both osteoclasts and MGCs (13, 34, 35), suggesting that MGCs might become multinuclear via a process similar to that of osteoclasts. Stimulation with IL-4 plus IL-3 induced formation of polyploid cells but only rarely induced cell proliferation (Fig. 8A). This observation was confirmed by BrdU incorporation assays (Fig. 8B). Consistent with these observations, neither incomplete cytokinesis nor cell fusion involving incomplete cytokinesis was observed (Table 3). These results suggested that fusion of cells that undergo incomplete cytokinesis may be involved in formation of RANKL-induced osteoclasts but not MGCs.
TABLE 3.
Event | Fusion combination |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
mKO2 (DN) × mKO2 (DN) | mKO2 (DN) × mAG | mAG × mAG | Total no. (%) | |
Cell fusion | 64 | 12 | 0 | 76 |
Cell fusion involving incomplete cytokinesis | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 (0.0) |
Cytokinesis after fusion | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 (3.95) |
Cell cycle progression seems to be required for formation of multinucleated osteoclasts but not MGCs. To address this point, we examined the effect of blocking cell cycle on multinucleation of osteoclasts and MGCs. Treatment with aphidicolin, an inhibitor of nuclear DNA replication that blocks the cell cycle at early S phase, drastically increased green cell proportion in RANKL-stimulated osteoclasts, but only slightly in IL-4 +IL-3-stimulated MGCs (Fig. 9A), indicating that aphidicolin induced S phase arrest in osteoclasts but not in MGCs. In addition, treatment with aphidicolin significantly inhibited formation of multinucleated osteoclasts, but not MGCs (Fig. 9B). These results suggested that RANKL but not IL-4 plus IL-3 promoted cell cycle progression and supported the idea that cell cycle progression is necessary for formation of multinucleated osteoclasts but not MGCs. Therefore, although osteoclasts and MGCs are generated from the same lineage of progenitors and require common molecules to become multinuclear, the mechanisms underlying the formation of these distinct types of multinucleated cells are likely to be different.
RANKL-induced Akt Activation Controls Incomplete Cytokinesis during Osteoclast Development
To understand the molecular mechanism by which incomplete cytokinesis is controlled during RANKL-induced osteoclast multinucleation, we first examined a small GTPase, Rho, which plays a role in cytokinesis by regulating the contractile ring (36, 37). Treatment with Y27632, a selective inhibitor of Rho-associated protein kinase (ROCK), a downstream target of Rho, neither inhibited nor promoted generation of multinucleated osteoclasts (Fig. 10A). These results suggested that Rho is not an important factor in RANKL-induced osteoclast multinucleation.
We next searched for signal molecules whose activation is induced in osteoclasts but not in MGCs. We examined phosphorylation of MAPKs (p38, ERK, and JNK) and Akt and degradation of IκBα. We found that phosphorylation of Akt and degradation of IκBα were induced in RANKL-stimulated osteoclasts more than twice as much as those in monocytes but were only slightly induced in IL-4 + IL-3-stimulated MGCs (Fig. 10B). Both Akt and NF-κB are involved in osteoclast formation (38–40). Consistent with previous reports, blocking Akt activation by treatment with Akt inhibitor VIII or blocking NF-κB activation by treatment with SN50 prevented RANKL-induced formation of multinucleated osteoclasts (Fig. 10, C and D). Blocking NF-κB activation also inhibited MGC formation (Fig. 10D). However, blocking of Akt activation did not inhibit IL-4 + IL-3-induced MGC formation (Fig. 10C).
To better understand the role of Akt and NF-κB in multinucleation and incomplete cytokinesis of osteoclasts, we performed time-lapse imaging. In these experiments, dTg-BMMs were stimulated with RANKL in the presence or absence of inhibitors for 1 h, and then cell cycle progression and polyploidization were observed. RANKL induced incomplete cytokinesis in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 11), and the increase in incomplete cytokinesis was significantly inhibited when Akt activation was blocked (89.3% lower than in control osteoclasts treated with 150 ng/ml RANKL; Fig. 11). Akt inhibitor VIII also decreased entry to mitotic phase by half (53.4% lower than in control osteoclasts treated with 150 ng/ml RANKL; Fig. 11), suggesting that Akt may play a role in regulating both incomplete cytokinesis and cell cycle progression during osteoclast differentiation. Inhibition of NF-κB activation by SN50 decreased not only incomplete cytokinesis (85.2% lower than in control osteoclasts treated with 150 ng/ml RANKL; Fig. 11) but also entry to mitotic phase (73.5% lower than in control osteoclasts treated with 150 ng/ml RANKL; Fig. 11), suggesting that NF-κB signaling pathway is involved in cell cycle progression in osteoclasts. Considering that SN50 inhibited multinucleation of MGCs (Fig. 10D), which were generated by incomplete cytokinesis-independent fusion (Figs. 8 and 9), it is plausible that NF-κB signaling pathway plays roles not only in cell cycle progression but also in fusion. Taken together, these results suggest that Akt-dependent RANKL-induced incomplete cytokinesis is involved in the formation of polyploid osteoclasts.
Discussion
Osteoclasts require polyploidization to acquire sufficient bone-resorbing activity. Using Fucci-expressing BMMs, we were able to distinguish polyploid cells from S/G2/M phase cells by flow cytometry. In combination with time-lapse imaging analysis, we showed that the polyploidization of osteoclasts is due to not only cell fusion, but also incomplete cytokinesis. In addition, we demonstrated nuclear polyploidy of osteoclasts in vivo. Although incomplete cytokinesis has been extensively studied in pathological contexts, its role in physiological contexts remains unclear. Our findings reveal the importance of incomplete cytokinesis in the formation of polyploid osteoclasts, a normal physiological process.
Using inhibitors, we sought to identify signaling molecules that control incomplete cytokinesis during osteoclast polyploidization. Blocking ROCK neither inhibited nor promoted osteoclast multinucleation and had no effect on cytokinesis or incomplete cytokinesis during osteoclast formation (Figs. 10A and 11). Although the Rho signaling pathway regulates cytokinesis by driving actin and myosin, our observations suggested that it may not play a major role in either cytokinesis/incomplete cytokinesis or cell fusion in osteoclast polyploidization. Blocking NF-κB decreased formation of osteoclasts and MGCs (Fig. 10, B and D). In addition, blocking NF-κB activation inhibited not only incomplete cytokinesis but also cell cycle progression (Fig. 11). These results suggested that NF-κB may not be specifically involved in regulation of incomplete cytokinesis.
We identified Akt as a key molecule involved in the control of incomplete cytokinesis during osteoclast polyploidization. Notably in this regard, Akt plays a role in the formation of tetraploid vascular smooth endothelial cells and hepatocytes by regulating incomplete cytokinesis (41, 42). Our results suggest that Akt-mediated incomplete cytokinesis is a general program involved in the formation of polyploidy. We cannot exclude the possibility that Akt also plays a role in the cell fusion process. Future work should further explore the role of Akt in incomplete cytokinesis and cell fusion. Blocking Akt activation also attenuated entry into mitosis (Fig. 11). Indeed, Akt is involved in cell cycle regulation (43). These observations suggest that Akt plays multiple roles during osteoclastogenesis, including regulation of both incomplete cytokinesis and cell cycle progression. Of note, stimulation with RANKL, but not IL-4 plus IL-3, promoted cell cycle progression (Fig. 9A), and blocking the RANKL-induced cell cycle progression inhibited formation of multinucleated osteoclasts (Fig. 9B). These results reinforce the idea that mitotic entry and cell cycle progression are important for generation of multinucleated osteoclasts.
Akt is an important downstream effector of PI3K, which is also involved in osteoclast formation (44), suggesting that the PI3K-Akt signaling pathway plays a role in osteoclast multinucleation. However, blocking of PI3K activation by treatment with the selective PI3K inhibitor LY294002 significantly inhibited not only incomplete cytokinesis (79.5% lower than in control-treated osteoclasts) but also cytokinesis (81.3% lower than in control-treated osteoclasts) (Fig. 11). In addition, blocking PI3K inhibited formation of both RANKL-induced multinucleated osteoclasts and IL-4 + IL-3-induced MGCs (Fig. 10E). In addition to Akt, PI3K also regulates Vav3, phospholipase Cγ2, and Grb2 activation (45). Hence, it is plausible that PI3K regulates a number of biological events, including incomplete cytokinesis. Further investigation will be required to understand the contribution of the PI3K-Akt pathway to regulation of RANKL-induced incomplete cytokinesis. We also examined the involvement of molecules previously determined to play a role in cell fusion, such as DC-STAMP, in blocking antibody experiments (anti-DC-STAMP mAb, clone 1A2); however, we did not see a specific effect on incomplete cytokinesis (data not shown). Future studies should attempt to clarify the involvement of fusion-related molecules in incomplete cytokinesis.
The molecular mechanism that selectively regulates incomplete cytokinesis during polyploidization of osteoclasts remains unclear. We observed Akt-regulated incomplete cytokinesis in RANKL-induced osteoclasts but not in IL-4 + IL-3-induced MGCs. These results suggest that the binding of RANKL to receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB, the receptor for RANKL, triggers signaling pathways that selectively regulate incomplete cytokinesis. Further studies will be required to determine the molecular mechanisms underlying regulation of incomplete cytokinesis by Akt during osteoclastogenesis.
We observed a low incidence (11%) of cell fusion involving incomplete cytokinesis during formation of multinucleated osteoclasts in vitro (Table 2), implying that there are at least two types of polyploid osteoclasts as follows: one generated by diploid cells (canonical cell fusion) and the other generated by diploid cells and cells that undergo incomplete cytokinesis (atypical cell fusion) (Fig. 12). We did not try to observe cell fusion following incomplete cytokinesis (atypical cell fusion) in vivo because the phenomenon takes more than a day, surpassing the current time limit for intravital imaging. Instead, we used fluorescence in situ hybridization to reveal that osteoclasts have nuclei with more than the diploid complement of chromosomes (>2N). In addition, we found circulating osteoclast precursors (Ly6C+ cells) that were G1 × 4C. These results suggested that cells that increase ploidy via cell cycle-dependent mechanisms are involved in the formation of multinucleated osteoclasts in vivo. However, we cannot exclude the possibilities that the nuclear polyploidy might also be caused by nuclear fusion, and Ly6C+ G1 × 4C cells were merely fusion products. Further studies will be required to clarify this issue.
The proportion of multinucleated osteoclasts generated by atypical cell fusion in vivo, as well as the functional differences between osteoclasts generated by canonical cell fusion and osteoclasts generated by atypical cell fusion, still remains unclear. FITC gelatin resorption assay showed that the cells that underwent incomplete cytokinesis and re-entered S phase (green+ binucleated cells) barely degraded FITC gelatin (Fig. 6E). These observations suggested that osteoclasts generated by atypical cell fusion might have relatively lower resorption activity than that by canonical cell fusion. However, it cannot be excluded that the difference of the resorption activity between cells in G1 phase and cells in S phase merely reflected the difference of their cell cycle phase. To address these issues, it will be necessary to identify specific markers expressed on cells that undergo incomplete cytokinesis.
What is the physiological significance of polyploid nuclei within a cell? This phenomenon may be just one aspect of the phenotype of terminally differentiated cells, or a consequence of stress response that preserves cell function. Alternatively, polyploid nuclei may create genetic diversity, which could promote better adaptation to chronic injury or stress (2, 46, 47). Very little is known regarding the physiological function of the polyploid state, largely due to technical limitations (e.g. there currently exist no methods for converting a tissue composed of polyploid cells into a tissue of the same size composed of diploid cells). A full understanding of the mechanisms of polyploidization is necessarily to reveal the physiological significance of osteoclast polyploidization via cell fusion and incomplete cytokinesis.
Author Contributions
N. T. and Y. C. designed the study and wrote the paper. N. T., H. K., and H. M. performed and analyzed the experiments. A. S., A. M., M. T., O. K., and M. I. provided reagents and data analysis. All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr. Matt Walsh for critical discussion and reading the manuscript. We also thank to the Cell and Developmental Biology Microscopy Core, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, for technical assistance with microscopy.
This work was supported by the Uehara Memorial Foundation, the Nakatomi Foundation, Tomizawa Jun-ichi and Keiko Fund of the Molecular Biology Society of Japan for Young Scientists, the Pharma-link between Academia and Shionogi, the Takeda Science Foundation (to N.T.), and in part by National Institutes of Health Grants AR055903 and AR067726 (to Y. C.). The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest with the contents of this article. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
This article contains supplemental Movies S1–S5.
N. Takegahara and Y. Choi, unpublished observations.
- RANKL
- receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand
- MGC
- multinucleated giant cell
- BMM
- bone marrow-derived macrophage
- dTg
- double-transgenic
- 7-AAD
- 7-aminoactinomycin
- BP
- band path filter
- mAG
- monomeric Azami Green.
References
- 1. Otto S. P. (2007) The evolutionary consequences of polyploidy. Cell 131, 452–462 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Pandit S. K., Westendorp B., and de Bruin A. (2013) Physiological significance of polyploidization in mammalian cells. Trends Cell Biol. 23, 556–566 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Sakaue-Sawano A., Hoshida T., Yo M., Takahashi R., Ohtawa K., Arai T., Takahashi E., Noda S., Miyoshi H., and Miyawaki A. (2013) Visualizing developmentally programmed endoreplication in mammals using ubiquitin oscillators. Development 140, 4624–4632 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Edgar B. A., Zielke N., and Gutierrez C. (2014) Endocycles: a recurrent evolutionary innovation for post-mitotic cell growth. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 15, 197–210 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Lee H. O., Davidson J. M., and Duronio R. J. (2009) Endoreplication: polyploidy with purpose. Genes Dev. 23, 2461–2477 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Machlus K. R., and Italiano J. E. Jr. (2013) The incredible journey: from megakaryocyte development to platelet formation. J. Cell Biol. 201, 785–796 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Gentric G., Desdouets C., and Celton-Morizur S. (2012) Hepatocytes polyploidization and cell cycle control in liver physiopathology. Int. J. Hepatol. 2012, 282430. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Gentric G., Celton-Morizur S., and Desdouets C. (2012) Polyploidy and liver proliferation. Clin. Res. Hepatol. Gastroenterol. 36, 29–34 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Aguilar P. S., Baylies M. K., Fleissner A., Helming L., Inoue N., Podbilewicz B., Wang H., and Wong M. (2013) Genetic basis of cell-cell fusion mechanisms. Trends Genet. 29, 427–437 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Srinivas B. P., Woo J., Leong W. Y., and Roy S. (2007) A conserved molecular pathway mediates myoblast fusion in insects and vertebrates. Nat. Genet. 39, 781–786 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Teitelbaum S. L. (2000) Bone resorption by osteoclasts. Science 289, 1504–1508 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Walsh M. C., Kim N., Kadono Y., Rho J., Lee S. Y., Lorenzo J., and Choi Y. (2006) Osteoimmunology: interplay between the immune system and bone metabolism. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 24, 33–63 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Yagi M., Miyamoto T., Sawatani Y., Iwamoto K., Hosogane N., Fujita N., Morita K., Ninomiya K., Suzuki T., Miyamoto K., Oike Y., Takeya M., Toyama Y., and Suda T. (2005) DC-STAMP is essential for cell-cell fusion in osteoclasts and foreign body giant cells. J. Exp. Med. 202, 345–351 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Oren-Suissa M., and Podbilewicz B. (2007) Cell fusion during development. Trends Cell Biol. 17, 537–546 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Mizoguchi T., Muto A., Udagawa N., Arai A., Yamashita T., Hosoya A., Ninomiya T., Nakamura H., Yamamoto Y., Kinugawa S., Nakamura M., Nakamichi Y., Kobayashi Y., Nagasawa S., Oda K., et al. (2009) Identification of cell cycle-arrested quiescent osteoclast precursors in vivo. J. Cell Biol. 184, 541–554 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Meiyanto E., Hoshijima M., Ogawa T., Ishida N., and Takeya T. (2001) Osteoclast differentiation factor modulates cell cycle machinery and causes a delay in S phase progression in RAW264 cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 282, 278–283 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Sankar U., Patel K., Rosol T. J., and Ostrowski M. C. (2004) RANKL coordinates cell cycle withdrawal and differentiation in osteoclasts through the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors p27KIP1 and p21CIP1. J. Bone Miner. Res. 19, 1339–1348 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Kim N. S., Kim H. J., Koo B. K., Kwon M. C., Kim Y. W., Cho Y., Yokota Y., Penninger J. M., and Kong Y. Y. (2006) Receptor activator of NF-κB ligand regulates the proliferation of mammary epithelial cells via Id2. Mol. Cell. Biol. 26, 1002–1013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Aiba Y., Kometani K., Hamadate M., Moriyama S., Sakaue-Sawano A., Tomura M., Luche H., Fehling H. J., Casellas R., Kanagawa O., Miyawaki A., and Kurosaki T. (2010) Preferential localization of IgG memory B cells adjacent to contracted germinal centers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107, 12192–12197 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Tomura M., Sakaue-Sawano A., Mori Y., Takase-Utsugi M., Hata A., Ohtawa K., Kanagawa O., and Miyawaki A. (2013) Contrasting quiescent G0 phase with mitotic cell cycling in the mouse immune system. PLOS ONE 8, e73801. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Sakaue-Sawano A., Kurokawa H., Morimura T., Hanyu A., Hama H., Osawa H., Kashiwagi S., Fukami K., Miyata T., Miyoshi H., Imamura T., Ogawa M., Masai H., and Miyawaki A. (2008) Visualizing spatiotemporal dynamics of multicellular cell cycle progression. Cell 132, 487–498 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Abe T., Sakaue-Sawano A., Kiyonari H., Shioi G., Inoue K., Horiuchi T., Nakao K., Miyawaki A., Aizawa S., and Fujimori T. (2013) Visualization of cell cycle in mouse embryos with Fucci2 reporter directed by Rosa26 promoter. Development 140, 237–246 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Kikuta J., Wada Y., Kowada T., Wang Z., Sun-Wada G. H., Nishiyama I., Mizukami S., Maiya N., Yasuda H., Kumanogoh A., Kikuchi K., Germain R. N., and Ishii M. (2013) Dynamic visualization of RANKL and Th17-mediated osteoclast function. J. Clin. Invest. 123, 866–873 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Yamaguchi H., Yoshida S., Muroi E., Yoshida N., Kawamura M., Kouchi Z., Nakamura Y., Sakai R., and Fukami K. (2011) Phosphoinositide 3-kinase signaling pathway mediated by p110α regulates invadopodia formation. J. Cell Biol. 193, 1275–1288 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Storchova Z., and Pellman D. (2004) From polyploidy to aneuploidy, genome instability and cancer. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 5, 45–54 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Comai L. (2005) The advantages and disadvantages of being polyploid. Nat. Rev. Genet. 6, 836–846 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Teitelbaum S. L., and Ross F. P. (2003) Genetic regulation of osteoclast development and function. Nat. Rev. Genet. 4, 638–649 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Takahashi N., Udagawa N., Tanaka S., Murakami H., Owan I., Tamura T., and Suda T. (1994) Postmitotic osteoclast precursors are mononuclear cells which express macrophage-associated phenotypes. Dev. Biol. 163, 212–221 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Scimeca J. C., Franchi A., Trojani C., Parrinello H., Grosgeorge J., Robert C., Jaillon O., Poirier C., Gaudray P., and Carle G. F. (2000) The gene encoding the mouse homologue of the human osteoclast-specific 116-kDa V-ATPase subunit bears a deletion in osteosclerotic (oc/oc) mutants. Bone 26, 207–213 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Jacome-Galarza C. E., Lee S. K., Lorenzo J. A., and Aguila H. L. (2013) Identification, characterization, and isolation of a common progenitor for osteoclasts, macrophages, and dendritic cells from murine bone marrow and periphery. J. Bone Miner. Res. 28, 1203–1213 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Ishii M., Egen J. G., Klauschen F., Meier-Schellersheim M., Saeki Y., Vacher J., Proia R. L., and Germain R. N. (2009) Sphingosine-1-phosphate mobilizes osteoclast precursors and regulates bone homeostasis. Nature 458, 524–528 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Brodbeck W. G., and Anderson J. M. (2009) Giant cell formation and function. Curr. Opin. Hematol. 16, 53–57 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Vignery A. (2005) Macrophage fusion: are somatic and cancer cells possible partners? Trends Cell Biol. 15, 188–193 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Miyamoto H., Suzuki T., Miyauchi Y., Iwasaki R., Kobayashi T., Sato Y., Miyamoto K., Hoshi H., Hashimoto K., Yoshida S., Hao W., Mori T., Kanagawa H., Katsuyama E., Fujie A., et al. (2012) Osteoclast stimulatory transmembrane protein and dendritic cell-specific transmembrane protein cooperatively modulate cell-cell fusion to form osteoclasts and foreign body giant cells. J. Bone Miner. Res. 27, 1289–1297 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Lee S. H., Rho J., Jeong D., Sul J. Y., Kim T., Kim N., Kang J. S., Miyamoto T., Suda T., Lee S. K., Pignolo R. J., Koczon-Jaremko B., Lorenzo J., and Choi Y. (2006) v-ATPase V0 subunit d2-deficient mice exhibit impaired osteoclast fusion and increased bone formation. Nat. Med. 12, 1403–1409 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Glotzer M. (2005) The molecular requirements for cytokinesis. Science 307, 1735–1739 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Etienne-Manneville S., and Hall A. (2002) Rho GTPases in cell biology. Nature 420, 629–635 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Moon J. B., Kim J. H., Kim K., Youn B. U., Ko A., Lee S. Y., and Kim N. (2012) Akt induces osteoclast differentiation through regulating the GSK3beta/NFATc1 signaling cascade. J. Immunol. 188, 163–169 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Greenblatt M. B., Park K. H., Oh H., Kim J. M., Shin D. Y., Lee J. M., Lee J. W., Singh A., Lee K. Y., Hu D., Xiao C., Charles J. F., Penninger J. M., Lotinun S., Baron R., et al. (2015) CHMP5 controls bone turnover rates by dampening NF-κB activity in osteoclasts. J. Exp. Med. 212, 1283–1301 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Abu-Amer Y., Darwech I., and Otero J. (2008) Role of the NF-κB axis in immune modulation of osteoclasts and bone loss. Autoimmunity 41, 204–211 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Celton-Morizur S., Merlen G., Couton D., Margall-Ducos G., and Desdouets C. (2009) The insulin/Akt pathway controls a specific cell division program that leads to generation of binucleated tetraploid liver cells in rodents. J. Clin. Invest. 119, 1880–1887 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Hixon M. L., Muro-Cacho C., Wagner M. W., Obejero-Paz C., Millie E., Fujio Y., Kureishi Y., Hassold T., Walsh K., and Gualberto A. (2000) Akt1/PKB upregulation leads to vascular smooth muscle cell hypertrophy and polyploidization. J. Clin. Invest. 106, 1011–1020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Gonzalez E., and McGraw T. E. (2009) The Akt kinases: isoform specificity in metabolism and cancer. Cell Cycle 8, 2502–2508 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Oikawa T., Oyama M., Kozuka-Hata H., Uehara S., Udagawa N., Saya H., and Matsuo K. (2012) Tks5-dependent formation of circumferential podosomes/invadopodia mediates cell-cell fusion. J. Cell Biol. 197, 553–568 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Peng Q., Malhotra S., Torchia J. A., Kerr W. G., Coggeshall K. M., and Humphrey M. B. (2010) TREM2- and DAP12-dependent activation of PI3K requires DAP10 and is inhibited by SHIP1. Sci. Signal. 3, ra38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Leevers S. J., and McNeill H. (2005) Controlling the size of organs and organisms. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 17, 604–609 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Fox D. T., and Duronio R. J. (2013) Endoreplication and polyploidy: insights into development and disease. Development 140, 3–12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.