Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Feb 12.
Published in final edited form as: Immunotherapy (Los Angel). 2015 Oct 31;1(1):102.

Chondrocyte Apoptosis in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Is Preventive Therapy Possible?

Charles J Malemud 1,*
PMCID: PMC4751576  NIHMSID: NIHMS749993  PMID: 26878072

Introduction

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a systemic, chronic autoimmune disease of unknown etiology. At the tissue and organ level, respectively, RA is associated with sustained synovial joint inflammation which may also go on to affect other peripheral organs [1]. At the cellular level, RA is characterized by defective innate and adaptive immune responses [2]. Thus, experimental studies designed to dissect out the progression of RA changes have noted the extensive presence of activated T-lymphocytes with associated B-cell hyperactivity, as well as heightened migration, adhesion and retention of activated macrophages, dendritic cells and neutrophils emanating from the peripheral circulation and reaching synovial tissue [3]. These cellular events ultimately give rise to activate the normally quiescent synovial tissue fibroblasts which most often results from the action of pro-inflammatory cytokines and other soluble mediators of inflammation that are abundantly present in the RA synovial joint [4]. The clustering of these aberrant cellular events culminate in subchondral bone erosions. In this regard, bone erosions have also been associated with mechanically-deficient ligaments and tendons as well as a marked increase in the degradation of articular cartilage extracellular matrix proteins. The destruction of articular cartilage generally occurs under these conditions following the up-regulation matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) gene expression [5]. However, paradoxically this increase in MMP gene expression is also accompanied by a marked increase in the frequency of non-viable articular chondrocytes which can result from controlled cell death, also known as programmed cell death or apoptosis [68].

Significant clinical advances have been made in the therapeutic management of RA over the last 15–20 years, including the development of biologic drugs and small molecule inhibitors designed to either block the interaction between pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin-1β (IL-1β) and IL-6 with their respective receptors on the plasma membrane of macrophages and other cell types involved in the progression of RA [916]. However, there has been little advancement in our understanding of whether these therapeutic strategies also ameliorate chondrocyte apoptosis.

TNF-α blockade fits prominently into the medical therapy of RA. In addition to its well-known role as a clinically efficacious treatment, TNF-α blockade [1013] appears to ameliorate the progression of bone erosions in RA. In addition, because TNF-α is a potent inducer of apoptosis, TNF-α blockade is likely to reduce, but not totally eliminate, apoptosis by the complex network of activated immune cells in RA. Biologic drugs designed to neutralize T-cell [17] and B-cell hyperactivity [18,19] or the activity of various Janus kinases [2023] have also been developed and approved for use in RA which may or may not affect chondrocyte apoptosis.

Importantly, no drugs have been developed for the clinical management of RA which specifically inhibit chondrocyte apoptosis. Thus, an advance in this field could become quite critical for maintaining the function of articular cartilage in the RA milieu, for in the absence of significant numbers of chondroprogenitor stem cells, which could theoretically replenish the population of chondrocytes lost via apoptosis, the death of articular chondrocytes in RA cartilage would appear to be an inevitable consequence of progressive RA disease. This appears to occur even under conditions of maximal therapeutic support. Therefore, an appropriate question one should ask is; could chondrocyte apoptosis be specifically blocked by preventive therapy?

Before designing drugs to specifically inhibit chondrocyte apoptosis in RA can be considered, it will be especially critical to also address at least one major conundrum characteristic of RA synovial joints. Thus, whereas there is ample evidence for the elevated frequency of chondrocyte apoptosis in RA cartilage, there is also compelling evidence for “apoptosis-resistance” in RA synovial tissue [2426]. Therefore, any therapeutic strategy to be employed in RA to inhibit chondrocyte apoptosis will confront the possibility that aberrant survival of activated cells of the immune system would be potentially exacerbated. Mechanistically speaking, this might arise by activating signaling pathways known to be involved in apoptosis, [3,8,15,22,23]. Therefore, to thwart this event it is likely that “survival” signaling pathways such as PI3K/Akt/mTOR-mediated signaling may also have to be simultaneously targeted [27]. Potentially this would allow us to achieve the dual objective of inhibiting chondrocyte apoptosis while also blunting the aberrant survival of activated immune cells.

The impact of the epigenome and microRNAs activity on the RA process are also likely to fit into the developing a complete picture of how apoptosis can become deregulated in RA. Epigenetics has been characterized as “the DNA-templated process that results in heritable changes in gene activity and expression” [28]. Therefore, an understanding of how DNA methylation patterns alter RA pathogenesis and disease progression will be critical for designing future therapies for RA [2931]. For example, altered methylome patterns were found in activated RA synovial fibroblasts which probably reflect the hyperactivity of these cells [30]. Moreover, reversing the impact of DNA hypomethylation by inhibiting the polyamine recycling pathway is strongly considered to be a potential therapeutic target for RA [31]. On the other hand, microRNAs form another component of epigenetics which regulates many target genes considered critical to the development of RA [32]. In that regard, Churov et al. [33] reported that the many microRNAs are systemically (i.e., both peripherally and at the level of the joint) overexpressed in RA, including, microRNA (miR)-16, miR-146a/b, miR-150, miR-155 and miR-223. However, other miRs (e.g., miR-21, miR-125a, miR-223 and miR-451) are elevated principally in the plasma and serum of RA patients which suggest that these miRs may be useful biomarkers for assessing RA disease activity.

With respect to the potential role of miRs as regulators of apoptosis it was recently shown that the transcription factor, Twist1 which has a limiting effect on murine T-cell activation as well as another transcription factor, t-Bet, induces miR-148a gene expression. This, in turn, regulates the expression of the pro-apoptotic protein Bim. Thus, “antagomirs” of miR-148a when incubated with chronically activated murine Th1 cells increased the expression of Bim while also increasing the Th1 apoptotic response [34]. In contrast, Treg cells in RA synovial fluid were shown to express elevated levels of Bcl-2 and miR-21. These Treg cells showed little capacity to undergo apoptosis [35]. Although most of the miR manipulation studies to date have focused on regulating the apoptotic responses of chronically activated immune cells, it may be also be possible in RA to employ such strategies to prevent chondrocytes from undergoing apoptosis.

It is also germane for the future development of drugs to manage RA to briefly examine the evidence that has accumulated which directly implicates chondrocyte apoptosis as a critical pathophysiologic element in the progression of RA. In that regard, Kim and Song [36] were among the first group of investigators to compare the frequency of chondrocyte apoptosis in RA versus normal articular cartilage. In their study, they found about a 45-fold increase in the frequency of apoptotic chondrocytes in RA cartilage when compared to normal cartilage. They also reported a 1.85-times lower level of Bcl-2 gene expression with no differences in Fas gene expression between RA and normal cartilage. A subsequent analyses of RA cartilage reported several additional changes in RA cartilage which were consistent with an increased frequency of chondrocyte apoptosis. These included, evidence of natural killer activity in RA chondrocytes involving granzyme B activity [37], the latter enzyme having been implicated in poly-ADP-ribose polymerase degradation (PARP) [38] as well as high levels of TNF-α, IL-1β [39], and IL-8 [40]. Importantly. TNF-α, IL-1β, and interferon-γ were also associated with induction of chondrocyte apoptosis [9,4144] whereas IL-6 and IL-4 were not [40]. Other cellular events which govern the development of acute and chronic inflammation have also been implicated in chondrocyte apoptosis [45]. These include, inducible nitric oxide, a potent inducer of chondrocyte apoptosis [46] which was also reported to be at increased levels in RA cartilage as were 2 apoptosis-related genes, namely, the c-myc and p53 genes [47]. However, the likelihood that a complex networking exists between these factors which have been implicated in chondrocyte apoptosis was at play in RA was suggested by the results of a study by Relίc et al. [48] who showed that TNF-α actually protected articular chondrocytes from nitric oxide-induced apoptosis by acting through the inhibition NF-κB and cyclooxygenase-2 activity.

Interestingly, the association between clinically active periodontal disease and RA [49] may also be related to the elevated frequency of apoptotic chondrocytes in RA. Thus, Röhner et al. [50] reported an increased frequency of TUNEL- and Annexin-V-positive chondrocytes (both are measures of DNA fragmentation and apoptosis) as well as up-regulation of caspase-3 in patients infected with Porphyromonas gingivalis. More recently, the results of an experimentally-based study showed that TNF-α potently increased autophagy-related gene which was accompanied by activated autophagy both in vitro and in vivo [51]. Moreover, arthritic hTNFα-transgenic mice transplanted with Atg (fl/fl) × LysMCRE (+) bone marrow cells showed evidence of fewer activated osteoclasts. In fact, these mice were also protected from TNF-α-induced bone erosions, loss of proteoglycan and chondrocyte death, thus indicating that autophagy was likely to play a crucial role in the progression of experimentally-induced RA disease [51] and perhaps in regulating the induction of chondrocyte apoptosis as well.

With regard to human RA, Wang et al. [52] showed that programmed cell death 5 (PDCD5), a novel apoptosis regulatory gene, was significantly elevated in the plasma and synovial fluid of RA patients where the level of PDCD5 was inversely correlated with TNF-α. Prior to the induction of apoptosis PDCD5 protein is distributed between the nucleus and cytoplasm. However, when apoptosis was induced, the level of PDCD5 protein was increased which was then translocated from the cytoplasm to the nucleus where PDCD5 accumulation PDCD5 occurred. Although the precise function of PDCD5 has not yet been defined, PDCD5 protein has been proposed as a regulator during the early phase of apoptosis [53]. These findings also suggested that although TNF-α may be an influential pro-inflammatory cytokine in the induction of apoptosis in RA joints, the abnormal expression of PDCD5 which was shown to play a role in regulating apoptosis in RA synoviocytes [54] may also be a fruitful target in RA for suppressing chondrocyte apoptosis.

Here, I want to propose a prudent strategy which would systematically investigate which of the many activated cells of the immune system known to be relevant in RA pathology is, in fact, responsible for producing those molecules which are likely to promote chondrocyte apoptosis. Although several novel targets have been previously proposed for further study in this regard, including, tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand receptor (TRAIL) [55], heat-shock protein-70 [56], NF-κB [57], NF-κB via bcl-3 [58], the BH3-family of proteins, especially, bcl-2 [59], TNF-related weak inducer of apoptosis (TWEAK) [60] and the forkhead box O family members of transcription factors [8,61] it still remains problematic as to which therapeutic strategies could be designed to independently target each of these potential critical apoptosis and anti-apoptosis-related factors. Importantly, this will have to be accomplished without compromising the therapeutic efficacy of drugs already FDA approved for the medical management of RA.

Finally, a clinical trial design which incorporated the acquisition of synovial tissue biopsies as a component for assessing the clinical efficacy of the JAK3-selective SMI, tofacitinib, reported by Boyle et al. [62] was a significant advance. This was because the results of this study verified that STAT1 and STAT3 activation was markedly reduced by tofacitinib measured ex vivo in these synovial tissue biopsies as well as confirming previously reported results of pre-clinical studies which had predicted that oral administration of tofacitinib would reduce synovial tissue MMP production. Indeed, MMP-1 and MMP-3 mRNA levels were reduced. In addition, treatment with tofacitinib significantly reduced synovial mRNA expression of the CCL2, CXCL10 and CXCL13 group of chemokines. Of note, CCL2 and CXCL13 were previously implicated in RA as chemokines active in the chemotactic response of immune cells [9]. In that regard, CXCL10 was found to contribute to the recruitment of Th1 cells to synovial joints [6365], whereas CCL2/MCP-1 was reported to be a ligand for CCR5 [63].

An extension this type of clinical trial study design to now include articular cartilage biopsies which could be analyzed ex vivo, although an admirable objective, would likely prove to be difficult after considering the long-standing standard of care guidelines for treating RA. Thus, any longitudinal sampling of articular cartilage would likely prove to be prohibitive. Nevertheless, the development of non-invasive imaging techniques that could theoretically be employed to assess the frequency of chondrocyte apoptosis following administration of experimental drugs in well-validated animal models of RA and then subsequently after employing approved therapies for RA (e.g., TNF blockade) would be a laudable goal going forward.

Acknowledgments

The results of experimental studies from the Malemud laboratory was supported, in part, by contracts (CJ Malemud, Principal Investigator) between Takeda Pharmaceuticals of North America (reference 44) and Genentech/Roche Group (Malemud et al. Submitted, 2015) and Case Western Reserve University (CWRU) and by the CWRU Visual Science Research Core Grant [P30 EY-11373] from the National Eye Institute (Bethesda, MD).

References

  • 1.Firestein GS. Immunologic mechanisms in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis. J Clin Rheumatol. 2005;11:S39–44. doi: 10.1097/01.rhu.0000166673.34461.33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Toh ML, Miossec P. The role of T cells in rheumatoid arthritis: new subsets and new targets. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2007;19:284–288. doi: 10.1097/BOR.0b013e32805e87e0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Malemud CJ, Schulte ME. Is there a common pathway for arthritis? Future Rheumatol. 2008;3:253–268. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Fox DA, Gizinski A, Morgan R, Lundy SK. Cell-cell interactions in rheumatoid arthritis synovium. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2010;36:311–323. doi: 10.1016/j.rdc.2010.02.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Malemud CJ. Regulation of chondrocyte matrix metalloproteinase gene expression. In: Dhalla NS, Chakraborti S, editors. Role of Proteases in Cellular Dysfunction. Springer Science; UK: 2013. pp. 63–77. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Korb A, Pavenstädt H, Pap T. Cell death in rheumatoid arthritis. Apoptosis. 2009;14:447–454. doi: 10.1007/s10495-009-0317-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Lewis AC, Malemud CJ. Correction of dysfunctional apoptosis in arthritis by pharmacologic interventions: Focus on altering the activity of inhibitor of apoptosis protein. In: Pandalai SG, editor. Recent Research Developments in Pharmacology. Kerala, India: 2001. pp. 69–84. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Wylie MA, Malemud CJ. Perspective: Deregulation of apoptosis in arthritis by altered signal transduction. Int J Clin Rheumatol. 2013;8:483–490. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Malemud CJ, Reddy SK. Targeting cytokines, chemokines and adhesion molecules in rheumatoid arthritis. Curr Rheum Rev. 2008;4:219–234. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Gibbons LJ, Hyrich KL. Biologic therapy for rheumatoid arthritis: clinical efficacy and predictors of response. BioDrugs. 2009;23:111–124. doi: 10.2165/00063030-200923020-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Upchurch KS, Kay J. Evolution of treatment for rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2012;6:vi28–vi36. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kes278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kumar P, Banik S. Pharmacotherapy options in rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Med Insights Arthritis Musculoskelet Disord. 2013;6:35–43. doi: 10.4137/CMAMD.S5558. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Meier FM, Frerix M, Hermann W, Müller-Ladner U. Current immunotherapy in rheumatoid arthritis. Immunotherapy. 2013;5:955–974. doi: 10.2217/imt.13.94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ostör AJ. Abatacept: a T-cell co-stimulation modulator for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Rheumatol. 2008;27:1343–1353. doi: 10.1007/s10067-008-0964-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Malemud CJ. Targeted drug development for arthritis. Future Med Chem. 2012;4:701–703. doi: 10.4155/fmc.12.24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Astry B, Harberts E, Moudgil KD. A cytokine-centric view of the pathogenesis and treatment of autoimmune arthritis. J Interferon Cytokine Res. 2011;31:927–940. doi: 10.1089/jir.2011.0094. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Schiff M. Abatacept treatment for rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2011;50:437–449. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keq287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Bracewell C, Isaacs JD, Emery P, Ng WF. Atacicept, a novel B cell-targeting biological therapy for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2009;9:909–919. doi: 10.1517/14712590903033919. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Jacobi AM, Dörner T. Current aspects of anti-CD20 therapy in rheumatoid arthritis. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2010;10:316–321. doi: 10.1016/j.coph.2010.02.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kasperkovitz PV, Verbeet NL, Smeets TJ, van Rietschoten JG, Kraan MC, et al. Activation of the STAT1 pathway in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2004;63:233–239. doi: 10.1136/ard.2003.013276. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Laurence A, Pesu M, Silvennoinen O, O’Shea J. JAK Kinases in Health and Disease: An Update. Open Rheumatol J. 2012;6:232–244. doi: 10.2174/1874312901206010232. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Malemud CJ. Inhibitors of JAK for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: Rationale and clinical data. Clin Invest. 2012;2:39–47. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Malemud CJ. The small molecular weight inhibitor of protein kinase revolution for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. In: Vallisuta O, Olimat S, editors. Drug Discovery and Development- From Molecules to Medicine. InTech Publishing; Rijeka, Croatia: 2015. pp. 163–179. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Hutcheson J, Perlman H. Apoptotic regulators and RA. Curr Rheum Rev. 2008;4:254–258. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Malemud CJ. Apoptosis resistance in rheumatoid arthritis synovial tissue. J Clin Cell Immunol. 2011;S3:006. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Malemud CJ. Immunotherapies and rheumatoid arthritis-Introduction. J Clin Cell Immunol. 2013:S6–001. doi: 10.4172/2155-9899.1000160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Malemud CJ. The PI3K/Akt/PTEN/mTOR pathway: a fruitful target for inducing cell death in rheumatoid arthritis? Future Med Chem. 2015;7:1137–1147. doi: 10.4155/fmc.15.55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Cribbs A, Feldmann M, Oppermann U. Towards an understanding of the role of DNA methylation in rheumatoid arthritis: therapeutic and diagnostic implications. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2015;7:206–219. doi: 10.1177/1759720X15598307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Roberts SB, Wootton E, De Ferrari L, Albagha OM, Salter DM. Epigenetics of osteoarticular diseases: recent developments. Rheumatol Int. 2015;35:1293–1305. doi: 10.1007/s00296-015-3260-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Frank-Bertoncelj M, Gay S. The epigenome of synovial fibroblasts: an underestimated therapeutic target in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2014;16:117. doi: 10.1186/ar4596. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Klein K, Gay S. Epigenetics in rheumatoid arthritis. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2015;27:76–82. doi: 10.1097/BOR.0000000000000128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Song YJ, Li G, He JH, Guo Y, Yang L. Bioinformatics-Based Identification of MicroRNA-Regulated and Rheumatoid Arthritis-Associated Genes. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0137551. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0137551. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Churov AV, Oleinik EK, Knip M. MicroRNAs in rheumatoid arthritis: Altered expression and diagnostic potential. Autoimmun Rev. 2015;14:1029–1037. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2015.07.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Haftmann C, Stittrich AB, Zimmermann J, Fang Z, Hradilkova K, et al. miR-148a is upregulated by Twist1 and T-bet and promotes Th1-cell survival by regulating the proapoptotic gene Bim. Eur J Immunol. 2015;45:1192–1205. doi: 10.1002/eji.201444633. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.van der Geest KS, Smigielska-Czepiel K, Park JA, Abdulahad WH, Kim HW, et al. SF Treg cells transcribing high levels of Bcl-2 and microRNA-21 demonstrate limited apoptosis in RA. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2015;54:950–958. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keu407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Kim HA, Song YW. Apoptotic chondrocyte death in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1999;42:1528–1537. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(199907)42:7<1528::AID-ANR28>3.0.CO;2-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Saito S, Murakoshi K, Kotake S, Kamatani N, Tomatsu T. Granzyme B induces apoptosis of chondrocytes with natural killer cell-like cytotoxicity in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2008;35:1932–1943. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Chaitanya GV, Steven AJ, Babu PP. PARP-1 cleavage fragments: signatures of cell-death proteases in neurodegeneration. Cell Commun Signal. 2010;8:31. doi: 10.1186/1478-811X-8-31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Malemud CJ. Molecular mechanisms in rheumatic diseases: Rationale for novel drug development - Introduction. Anti-Inflammatory Anti-Allergy Agents Med Chem. 2011;10:73–77. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Furuzawa-Carballeda J, Macip-Rodriguez PM, Cabral AR. Osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis pannus have similar qualitative metabolic characteristics and pro-inflammatory cytokine response. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2008;26:554–560. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Malemud CJ, Pearlman E. Targeting JAK/STAT signaling pathway in inflammatory diseases. Curr Signal Transduct Ther. 2009;4:201–221. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Malemud CJ. Differential activation of JAK enzymes in rheumatoid arthritis and autoimmune disorders by proinflammatory cytokines – potential drug targets. Int J Interferon Cytokine Mediator Res. 2010;2:97–111. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Schuerwegh AJ, Dombrecht EJ, Stevens WJ, Van Offel JF, Bridts CH, et al. Influence of pro-inflammatory (IL-1 alpha, IL-6, TNF-alpha, IFN-gamma) and anti-inflammatory (IL-4) cytokines on chondrocyte function. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2003;11:681–687. doi: 10.1016/s1063-4584(03)00156-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Malemud CJ, Sun Y, Pearlman E, Ginley NM, Awadallah A, et al. Monosodium Urate and Tumor Necrosis Factor-α Increase Apoptosis in Human Chondrocyte Cultures. Rheumatology (Sunnyvale) 2012;2:113. doi: 10.4172/2161-1149.1000113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Malemud CJ. The discovery of novel experimental therapies for inflammatory arthritis. Mediators Inflamm. 2009;2009:698769. doi: 10.1155/2009/698769. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Kühn K, Shikhman AR, Lotz M. Role of nitric oxide, reactive oxygen species, and p38 MAP kinase in the regulation of human chondrocyte apoptosis. J Cell Physiol. 2003;197:379–387. doi: 10.1002/jcp.10372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Yatsugi N, Tsukazaki T, Osaki M, Koji T, Yamashita S, et al. Apoptosis of articular chondrocytes in rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis: correlation of apoptosis with degree of cartilage destruction and expression of apoptosis-related proteins of p53 and c-myc. J Orthop Sci. 2000;5:150–156. doi: 10.1007/s007760050142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Relic B, Bentires-Alj M, Ribbens C, Franchimont N, Guerne PA, et al. TNF-alpha protects human primary articular chondrocytes from nitric oxide-induced apoptosis via nuclear factor-kappaB. Lab Invest. 2002;82:1661–1672. doi: 10.1097/01.lab.0000041714.05322.c0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Mercado FB, Marshall RI, Klestov AC, Bartold PM. Relationship between rheumatoid arthritis and periodontitis. J Periodontol. 2001;72:779–787. doi: 10.1902/jop.2001.72.6.779. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Röhner E, Detert J, Kolar P, Hocke A, N’Guessan P, et al. Induced apoptosis of chondrocytes by Porphyromonas gingivalis as a possible pathway for cartilage loss in rheumatoid arthritis. Calcif Tissue Int. 2010;87:333–340. doi: 10.1007/s00223-010-9389-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Lin NY, Beyer C, Giessl A, Kireva T, Scholtysek C, et al. Autophagy regulates TNF α-mediated joint destruction in experimental arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013;72:761–768. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-201671. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Wang J, Guan Z, Ge Z. Plasma and synovial fluid programmed cell death 5 (PDCD5) levels are inversely associated with TNF-α and disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Biomarkers. 2013;18:155–159. doi: 10.3109/1354750X.2012.759277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Chen Y, Sun R, Han W, Zhang Y, Song Q, et al. Nuclear translocation of PDCD5 (TFAR19): an early signal for apoptosis? FEBS Lett. 2001;509:191–196. doi: 10.1016/s0014-5793(01)03062-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Wang N, Lu HS, Guan ZP, Sun TZ, Chen YY, et al. Involvement of PDCD5 in the regulation of apoptosis in fibroblast-like synoviocytes of rheumatoid arthritis. Apoptosis. 2007;12:1433–1441. doi: 10.1007/s10495-007-0070-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Morel J, Audo R, Hahne M, Combe B. Tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) induces rheumatoid arthritis synovial fibroblast proliferation through mitogen activated protein kinases and phosphatidylinositol/Akt. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:15709–15718. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M414469200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Kang EH, Kim DJ, Lee EY, Lee YJ, Lee EB, et al. Downregulation of heat shock protein 70 protects rheumatoid arthritis fibroblast-like synoviocytes from nitric oxide-induced apoptosis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2009;11:R130. doi: 10.1186/ar2797. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Mankan AK, Lawless MW, Gray SG, Kelleher D, McManus R. NF-ϰ B regulation: the nuclear response. J Cell Mol Med. 2009;13:631–643. doi: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2009.00632.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Palmer S, Chen YH. Bcl-3, a multifaceted modulator of NF-ϰ B-mediated gene transcription. Immunol Res. 2008;42:210–218. doi: 10.1007/s12026-008-8075-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Hutcheson J, Perlman H. BH3-only proteins in rheumatoid arthritis: potential targets for therapeutic intervention. Oncogene. 2008;27(Suppl 1):S168–175. doi: 10.1038/onc.2009.54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Park JS, Park MK, Lee SY, Oh HJ, Lim MA, et al. TWEAK promotes the production of Interleukin-17 in rheumatoid arthritis. Cytokine. 2012;60:143–149. doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2012.06.285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Ludikhuize J, de Launay D, Groot D, Smeets TJ, Vinkenoog M, et al. Inhibition of forkhead box class O family member transcription factors in rheumatoid synovial tissue. Arthritis Rheum. 2007;56:2180–2191. doi: 10.1002/art.22653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Boyle DL, Soma K, Hodge J, Kavanaugh A, Mandel D, et al. The JAK inhibitor tofacitinib suppresses synovial JAK1-STAT signalling in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2015;74:1311–1316. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-206028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Koch AE. Chemokines and their receptors in rheumatoid arthritis: future targets? Arthritis Rheum. 2005;52:710–721. doi: 10.1002/art.20932. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Patel DD, Zachariah JP, Whichard LP. CXCR3 and CCR5 ligands in rheumatoid arthritis synovium. Clin Immunol. 2001;98:39–45. doi: 10.1006/clim.2000.4957. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Hanaoka R, Kasama T, Muramatsu M, Yajima N, Shiozawa F, et al. A novel mechanism for the regulation of IFN-γ inducible protein-10 expression in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2003;5:R74–81. doi: 10.1186/ar616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES