Abstract
Echinocandin antifungal agents are not routinely recommended for the treatment of candiduria due to low urine concentrations and a paucity of clinical data supporting this indication. This report presents five cases describing the use of micafungin for the treatment of candiduria. Each patient received parenteral micafungin for a minimum of 6 days and had resolution of baseline fungal within 30 days of treatment completion.
Keywords: Antifungals, Critical care, Urinary tract infections, Fungal infections, Infectious disease
1. Introduction
The presence of yeast in urine is common among intensive care unit (ICU) patients, particularly among those who have predisposing risk factors such as catheterization, antimicrobial exposure, diabetes mellitus, and immunosuppression [1]. Current estimates indicate that up to 22% of patients in the ICU will have a urine culture positive for yeast during their hospitalization [2]. However, the clinical significance of this positive culture can often be confounded by contamination and colonization [3]. Nonetheless, the decision to treat is especially important, as candiduria in critically ill patients may be the only indication of disseminated candidiasis [4]. Although guidelines have been published, controversies over the diagnosis and management of candiduria still persist due to the difficulty in recognizing the clinical implications and significance of yeast in urine [5].
Historically, drug selection for the treatment of candiduria has been less controversial than that of diagnosis due to the limited number of antifungal agents achieving adequate urine concentrations. Fluconazole, an azole antifungal agent, is the preferred therapy for fluconazole-susceptible organisms because of its ability to achieve high urine concentrations and its favorable safety and pharmacokinetic profile [5]. However, isolates of the second most common causative species of candiduria, Candida glabrata, have demonstrated increased resistance to fluconazole [2], [6], [7].
The echinocandin class of antifungal agents represents an alternative therapy that possesses activity against most Candida species including fluconazole-resistant species of C. glabrata [8]. Currently, due to a paucity of clinical data and poor glomerular filtration, echinocandins are typically excluded as an antifungal agent used in the treatment of candiduria. However, pharmacokinetic and tissue distribution models in animals indicate micafungin penetrates into renal tissue [9], [10], [11]. In both single and multiple-dose studies evaluating the tissue distribution of micafungin in animals, micafungin was shown to rapidly and moderately distribute into liver, spleen, and kidney tissue [9]. In the multiple-dose study, renal tissue concentrations were noted to be in several-fold excess of the MIC90 of the Candida and Aspergillus species tested [10]. Despite moderate distribution into the kidneys, echinocandins exhibit negligible concentrations (<2%) of intact drug in human urine [12], [13]. Existing literature supporting the use of echinocandins for candiduria is limited to three reports containing ten individual cases in humans [14], [15], [16].
The first case series by Sobel et al. was a retrospective review of six patients with symptomatic candiduria who had received caspofungin in phase II or III clinical studies. All patients had clearance of candiduria after receiving of at least seven days of caspofungin for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections caused by Candida species. Three cases were persistent urinary tract infections secondary to C. glabrata in patients with diabetes mellitus and either urinary obstruction or stasis. The remaining three cases of candiduria were secondary to hematogenous renal candidiasis in patients with candidemia [14]. Lagrotteria et al. described the successful use of micafungin therapy in the treatment of two cases of persistent C. glabrata and one case of fluconazole-resistant Candida albicans candiduria in immunocompromised patients [15]. The final case report describes a favorable response to micafungin in the treatment of C. glabrata urinary sepsis in a diabetic patient with renal insufficiency [16]. This report aims to add to the current literature by describing the results of five patients who had resolution of candiduria following receipt of micafungin therapy (Table 1, Table 2).
Table 1.
Patient characteristics of patients with candiduria treated with micafungin.
| Patient | Age | Gender | Candida species | Catheter at time of first culture | Catheter change | Persistent candiduria following catheter changea | Fungemiab | Outcome Of candiduria |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 64 | Male | Candida glabrata | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Cleared |
| 2 | 78 | Female | Candida glabrata | No | – | – | No | Cleared |
| 3 | 42 | Female | Candida glabrata | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Cleared |
| 4 | 60 | Female | Candida albicans | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Cleared |
| 5 | 55 | Female | Candida glabrata | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Cleared |
Persistence was defined as an absence of the clearance of yeast on a repeat urinalysis or urine culture.
Candidemia was defined as a positive blood culture or positive Beta-d-glucan test.
Table 2.
Initial Urinalysis characteristics of patients with candiduria treated with micafungin.
| Patient | Leukocyte Esterase | Nitrite | RBC/HPF | WBC/HPF | Epithelial Cell/HPF | Hyaline Cast/LPF | Bacteria | Other |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1a | Negative | Negative | 3 | 2 | 1 | 6 | Few | Budding yeast |
| 2 | Large | Negative | 0–3 | 50–100 | 0–5 | None | Few/HPF | |
| 3 | Small | Negative | Occasional | 0–5 | 0–5 | 2–5 | Few | 0–1/LPF coarse granular casts |
| 4 | Moderate | Negative | Field obscured | Present | None | None | Present/HPF | Budding yeast |
| 5 | No initial urinalysis | |||||||
HPF=high powered field.
Initial UA from hospital day 19 prior to catheter change.
This was a retrospective medical record review of adult patients admitted to an ICU with a urine culture positive for at least 100,000 colonies of yeast treated with micafungin monotherapy from January 1, 2012 to October 31, 2014. All subjects were patients at Virginia Commonwealth University Health System (VCUHS), a 755-bed tertiary academic medical center in Richmond, Virginia. This study was reviewed and approved by the VCU Health Institutional Review Board. Micafungin was the echinocandin antifungal agent on formulary at the time of study.
Patients were identified by a query of the health system's electronic medical system (Cerner Information Systems). A total of 158 patients had a urine culture positive for yeast during the study period. Patients were then excluded if they received an antifungal regimen other than micafungin monotherapy, had an unknown treatment outcome, a polymicrobial urinary tract infection, or were a prisoner or pregnant. Five cases were identified; each patient received at least six days of parenteral micafungin therapy and had resolution of baseline fungal positivity within 30 days of treatment assessed via repeat urinalysis or urine culture. A detailed description of these five patient cases are included below.
2. Patient cases
2.1. Patient 1
A 64-year old male with history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and esophageal stricture with chronic percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube was initially admitted as a transfer from an outside hospital after he developed septic shock from Clostridium difficile following dilation of an esophageal stricture. Upon admission, he underwent a total colectomy with eventual ileostomy creation and abdominal closure. His postoperative recovery was complicated by vancomycin-resistant enterococcal bacteremia, Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) pneumonia resulting in respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation, and a C. glabrata urinary tract infection. An initial urine culture on hospital day 19 revealed 60×104 CFU/L of C. glabrata. Following a change of his catheter, the patient had two subsequent urine cultures with>10×105 CFU/L and 80×104CFU/L of C. glabrata on day+23 and day+24, respectively. A computerized axial tomography scan of the abdomen and pelvis at this time revealed mild bladder wall thickening likely exaggerated by underdistension. However, a superimposed infection could not be ruled out. On day+26, due to concerns for clinical decompensation with persistent leukocytosis, a rising serum creatinine, hypotension requiring vasopressor support, and tachypnea, micafungin 100 mg daily intravenously (IV) was started. Fungal blood cultures were negative and patient was continued on micafungin for 14 days with eradication of candiduria upon completion of treatment. Shortly thereafter, the patient was transitioned to comfort care measures.
2.2. Patient 2
A 78-year old female with history of diabetes and heart failure was admitted for septic shock two days after being discharged from a prolonged hospitalization for acute cardiac ischemia requiring stent placement that was complicated by a left femoral vascular injury. Upon initial presentation, she was febrile (Tmax: 40.1 °C), tachycardic (HR:100 beats per minute), tachypneic (RR:22 breaths per minute) and developed hypotension that required vasopressor support. Possible sources of sepsis included a left groin surgical wound and a urinary tract infection based on a urinalysis that revealed large leukocyte esterase, 50–100 WBC/hpf, few bacteria, and budding yeast. The urine culture subsequently grew>10×105 CFU/L C. glabrata. The patient completed a 10 day course of micafungin 100 mg daily for her urinary tract infection and a 14 day course of meropenem for wound tissue cultures that revealed Escherichia coli and Proteus mirabilis with intermittent requirement of vasopressor support. A urine culture upon completion of therapy indicated clearance of candiduria. Shortly thereafter, due to declining mental status, the decision was made to refrain from escalation of care and the patient passed away.
2.3. Patient 3
A 42-year old female with micronutrient deficiency secondary to gastric bypass surgery was initially admitted for polyneuropathy. During the hospitalization, she developed hypoxemic respiratory failure presumed to be secondary to pneumonia with super-imposed pulmonary edema. On day+6, despite the receipt of broad-spectrum antibiotics, her oxygenation status continued to worsen. She was started on micafungin due to concern for disseminated fungemia as she had both a respiratory culture revealing yeast and a urine culture with>10×105 CFU/L C. glabrata. The following day, her catheter was changed and a repeat urinalysis revealed persistent candiduria. After six days of micafungin treatment, her urine culture was negative for yeast. She was continued on micafungin for a total of 12 days for candiduria and was never found to be fungemic. Unfortunately, despite aggressive care her clinical status deteriorated and the decision was made to withdraw care.
2.4. Patient 4
A 60-year-old female with a past medical history significant for coronary artery disease, heart failure, and atrial fibrillation was initially admitted for dyspnea requiring intubation. On day+19, she became febrile (Tmax:39.3 °C), tachycardic (HR: 138 beats per minute), and tachypneic (RR: 23 breaths per minute); respiratory cultures were positive for yeast and a repeat urine culture following a catheter change revealed >10×105 CFU/L Candida albicans. She was started on micafungin 100 mg daily due to concerns for disseminated candidiasis. Blood cultures remained negative and she completed a seven-day course of micafungin. A urine culture obtained on day+26 revealed no significant growth of yeast.
2.5. Patient 5
A 55-year old female with hepatitis B and C, HIV with an undetectable viral load, diabetes mellitus, coronary artery disease, and end-stage renal disease was initially admitted secondary to concerns for a mediastinal abscess after recent coronary artery bypass graft surgery and a sternal wound infection. On day +5, a urine culture revealed >10×105 CFU/L C. glabrata. Her catheter was replaced and a new urine culture was drawn on day +8. This culture demonstrated persistence of >10×105 CFU/L C. glabrata with an MIC of ≥32 µg/ml. Micafungin 100 mg daily was stated and continued for 10 days. A urine culture at the end of treatment showed no growth [17].
3. Discussion
Guideline-based treatment for symptomatic candiduria includes amphotericin B, fluconazole and flucytosine [5]. The use of amphotericin B has routinely been limited due to issues with tolerability and the potential for nephrotoxicity. Of concern with the use of fluconazole is the increasing incidence of azole-resistant non-albicans species of Candida. Flucytosine may be an option in this subset of resistant infections. However, renal insufficiency especially among critically ill patients may limit flucytosine's usefulness.
Echinocandins represent an attractive treatment option in this setting given their favorable safety profile, broad-spectrum of activity against Candida species, limited drug interactions, and lack of dose adjustments in renal insufficiency [18]. Unlike fluconazole, echinocandins, including micafungin, have activity against biofilm produced by Candida albicans [19], [20], [21]. This may be of particular benefit, as one study investigating candiduria in catheter-associated urinary tract infections found that more than half of the of Candida isolates produced biofilm [17]. Major concerns with the use of echinocandins in the treatment of candiduria are their inability to achieve adequate urine concentrations and increasing resistance to C. glabrata species [12], [13], [22], [23]. Despite this, data from these five cases add to the existing evidence that micafungin may be successful in eradicating candiduria [11], [15], [16].
This study is not without limitations. First, all patients who had an unknown treatment outcome or who received combination therapy were excluded. Combination antifungal therapy was defined as concomitant or sequential therapy with more than one antifungal agent. Due to this exclusion criterion, it is possible that patients who received micafungin but were then switched to an alternative agent secondary to treatment failure were excluded. Thus, this case series may lack critical information on scenarios in which micafugin was an ineffective treatment for candiduria.
Secondly, the majority of patients in this study had an indwelling catheter at the time of the positive urine culture. Candiduria in this setting commonly represents colonization and thus treatment would only be indicated if the patient was symptomatic or candiduria persisted despite the removal of predisposing factors [4]. Due to the retrospective nature of this study, it was not possible to assess if patients were symptomatic. However, all patients with indwelling catheters had persistent candiduria despite a catheter change. In the single patient who did not have a catheter, the initial urinalysis revealed pyuria. If pyuria is utilized as a surrogate marker for infection, this case may be representative of a true urinary tract infection. Despite the limitation of not being able to confirm if these cases were true infections, micafungin did result in the short-term clearance of yeast in all five cases. Unfortunately, information on long-term urine sterilization was unable to be obtained.
Finally, this report is limited by a small sample size. Many patients were excluded due to receipt of a guideline-recommended antifungal agent, fluconazole. While some of the patients excluded received as few as one dose of fluconazole, the authors felt that inclusion of these cases could be confounded by co-administration of an antifungal agent with good urinary concentrations. Despite these limitations, the results support the use of micafungin for the treatment of candiduria. However, the results of this study should be interpreted with caution until these findings are confirmed by a prospective, randomized controlled trial.
Conflict of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
Acknowledgments
There are no acknowledgments.
References
- 1.Sobel J.D., Fisher J.F., Kauffman C.A., Newman C.A. Candida urinary tract infections—epidemiology. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2011;52:S433–S436. doi: 10.1093/cid/cir109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Kauffman C.A., Vazquez J.A., Sobel J.D. Prospective multicenter surveillance study of funguria in hospitalized patients. The National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Mycoses Study Group. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2000;30:14–18. doi: 10.1086/313583. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Fisher J.F., Newman C.L., Sobel J.D. Yeast in the urine: solutions for a budding problem. Clin. Infect. Dis. 1995;20:183–189. doi: 10.1093/clinids/20.1.183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Fisher J.F., Sobel J.D., Kauffman C.A., Newman C.A. Candida urinary tract infections—treatment. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2011;52:S457–S466. doi: 10.1093/cid/cir112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Pappas P.G., Kauffman C.A., Andes D. Clinical practice guidelines for the management candidiasis: 2009 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2009;48:503–535. doi: 10.1086/596757. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Baran J., Klauber E., Barczak J., Riederer K., Khatib R. Trends in antifungal susceptibility among Candida sp. Urinary isolates from 1994 and 1998. Journal of Clin. Microb. 2000;38:870–871. doi: 10.1128/jcm.38.2.870-871.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ozhak-Baysan B., Ogunc D., Colak D. Distribution and antifungal susceptibility of Candida species causing nosocomial candiduria. Med. Mycol. 2012;50:529–532. doi: 10.3109/13693786.2011.618996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ashley E.S.D., Lewis R., Lewis J.S., Martin C., Andes D. Pharmacology of systemic antifungal agents. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2006;43:S28–S39. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Niwa T., Yokota Y., Tokunaga A. Tissue distribution after intravenous dosing of micafungin, an antifungal drug, to rats. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2004;27:1154–1156. doi: 10.1248/bpb.27.1154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Groll A.H., Mickiene D., Petraitis V. Compartmental pharmacokinetics and tissue distribution of the antifungal echinocandin lipopeptide micafungin (FK463) in rabbits. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2001;45:3322–3327. doi: 10.1128/AAC.45.12.3322-3327.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Abruzzo G.K., Gill C.J., Flattery A.M. Efficacy of the echinocandin caspofungin against disseminated aspergillosis and candidiasis in cyclophosphamide-induced immunosuppressed mice. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2000;44:2310–2318. doi: 10.1128/aac.44.9.2310-2318.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Stone J.A., Xu X., Winchell G.A. Disposition of caspofungin: role of distribution in determining pharmacokinetics in plasma. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2004;48:815–823. doi: 10.1128/AAC.48.3.815-823.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Damle B.D., Dowell J.A., Walsky R.L., Weber G.L., Stogniew M., Inskeep P.B. In vitro and in vivo studies to characterize the clearance mechanism and potential cytochrome P450 interactions of anidulafungin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2009;53:1149–1156. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01279-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Sobel J.D., Bradshaw S.K., Lipka C.J., Kartsonis N.A. Caspofungin in the treatment of symptomatic candiduria. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2007;44:e46–e49. doi: 10.1086/510432. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Lagrotteria D., Rotstein C., Lee C.H. Treatment of candiduria with micafungin: a case series. Can. J. Infect. Dis. Med. Microbiol. 2007;18:149–150. doi: 10.1155/2007/768734. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Pieralli F., Bazzini C., Vannucchi V., Mancini A., Nozzoli C. A case of Candida glabrata severe urinary sepsis successfully treated with micafungin. Med. Mycol. Case Rep. 2014;5:1–3. doi: 10.1016/j.mmcr.2014.04.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Rishpana M.S., Kabbin J.S. Candiduria in catheter associated urinary tract infection with special reference to biofilm production. J. Clin. Diagn. Res. 2015;9:DC11–DC13. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/13910.6690. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Eschenauer G.A., Nguyen M., Clancy C.J. Is fluconazole or an Echinocandin the agent of choice for candidemia. Ann. Pharmacother. 2015;49:1068–1074. doi: 10.1177/1060028015590838. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Ghannoum M., Roilides E., Katragkou A., Petraitis V., Walsh T.J. The role of echinocandins in candida biofilm-related vascular catheter infections: in vitro and in vivo model systems. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2015;61(Suppl. 6):S618–S621. doi: 10.1093/cid/civ815. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Guembe M., Guinea J., Marcos-Zambrano L.J. Micafungin at physiological serum concentrations shows antifungal activity against Candida albicans and Candida parapsilosis biofilms. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2014;58:5581–5584. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02738-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Fiori B., Posteraro B., Torelli R. In vitro activities of anidulafungin and other antifungal agents against biofilms formed by clinical isolates of different Candida and Aspergillus species. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2011;55:3031–3035. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01569-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Perlin D.S. Echinocandin resistance in candida. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2015;61(Suppl. 6):S612–S617. doi: 10.1093/cid/civ791. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Arendrup M.C., Perlin D.S. Echinocandin resistance: an emerging clinical problem? Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis. 2014;27:484–492. doi: 10.1097/QCO.0000000000000111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
