Skip to main content
PMC home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2016 Feb 15;6:21530. doi: 10.1038/srep21530

Self-assembled platinum nanoparticles on sulfonic acid-grafted graphene as effective electrocatalysts for methanol oxidation in direct methanol fuel cells

Jinlin Lu 1,a, Yanhong Li 1, Shengli Li 1, San Ping Jiang 2,b
PMCID: PMC4753497  PMID: 26876468

Abstract

In this article, sulfonic acid-grafted reduced graphene oxide (S-rGO) were synthesized using a one-pot method under mild conditions, and used as Pt catalyst supports to prepare Pt/S-rGO electrocatalysts through a self-assembly route. The structure, morphologies and physicochemical properties of S-rGO were examined in detail by techniques such as atomic force microscope (AFM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). The S-rGO nanosheets show excellent solubility and stability in water and the average particle size of Pt nanoparticles supported on S-rGO is ~3.8 nm with symmetrical and uniform distribution. The electrocatalytic properties of Pt/S-rGO were investigated for methanol oxidation reaction (MOR) in direct methanol fuel cells (DMFCs). In comparison to Pt supported on high surface area Vulcan XC-72 carbon (Pt/VC) and Pt/rGO, the Pt/S-rGO electrocatalyst exhibits a much higher electrocatalytic activity, faster reaction kinetics and a better stability. The results indicate that Pt/S-rGO is a promising and effective electrocatalyst for MOR of DMFCs.

Graphene is a single-atom-thick sheet of hexagonally arrayed sp2-bonded carbon atoms. It is the thinnest and strongest materials ever reported. Graphene promises a great diversity of applications owing to its unique electronic, mechanical, thermal and chemical properties1,2,3. The earlier fundamental researches were initiated from the micromechanical cleavage of graphite for high-quality graphene sheets in a controlled and scalable manner4. Reduced graphene oxide (rGO) sheets can be prepared in large quantity through chemical reduction of graphene oxide (GO)5,6,7. However, the rGO often experiences an irreversible agglomeration and precipitation during the chemical reduction process. Extensive efforts have been made to overcome these problems. Stankovich et al.8,9 synthesized the stable aqueous dispersions of graphitic nanoplatelets coated by poly(sodium-4 styrene sulfonate). Reduced graphene nanosheets via non-covalent functionalization with a conducting polymer dispersant showed the decrease in the agglomeration10. Zhang et al.11 prepared conjugated-polyelectrolyte (CPE) functionalized rGO and the as-prepared CPE-functionalized rGO exhibited excellent solubility and stability in many polar solvents. However, the presence of the polymeric dispersing agent in graphene composite may be undesirable for some applications and alternative approaches have been explored. For example, Samulski et al.12 synthesized the lightly sulfonated graphene from graphene oxide in a multi-step process. Yang et al.13 synthesized chemically converted graphene nanosheets with 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane, showing improved water solubility. Nano-sized graphene can also be rapidly synthesized by an ion-exchange method14.

Direct methanol fuel cells (DMFCs) are very promising clean power sources for portable applications owing to their relatively high energy density, low operating temperatures and ease of handling of liquid fuel15,16. Storage and transportation of liquid methanol is much easier than gaseous hydrogen as it does not need high pressure or low temperature. One of the most important reactions in DMFCs is the methanol oxidation reaction, MOR17,18. Currently, platinum-based material is still the most widely investigated and important electrocatalyst for MOR, however, it is easily poisoned by adsorbed CO, an intermediate species of the MOR and the very high costs of precious Pt-based electrocatalysts inhibit the widespread use and applications of DMFCs19,20. However, the efficiency and electrocatalytic activity of Pt-based electrocatalysts can be significantly enhanced by fine dispersion and distribution of Pt nanoparticles (NPs) and interaction between the electrocatalysts and catalyst supports21,22. The nature and choice of the support can have significant effects on the catalytic properties of the electrocatalysts23,24,25,26. Chung et al.27 prepared Pt/graphene using a pulsed galvanostatic electrodeposition method and showed the improved electrocatalytic activity for MOR as compared with a commercial Pt/C catalyst, which was attributed to the synergistic effects between the Pt NPs and graphene sheets. Shang et al.28 prepared porous graphene films (GNFs) using chemical vapor deposition and deposited Pt NPs on GNFs by magnetron sputtering. The excellent electrocatalytic activity was ascribed to the porous honeycomb-like surface structure, large surface area and enhanced interactions between graphene and Pt NPs. Pt/graphene electrocatalysts were also synthesized through a chemical reduction route using ethylene glycol as reducing agent and showed a high electrocatalytic activity for MOR29. Zhao et al.30 synthesized graphene and nitrogen-doped graphene (N-G) using sodium borohydride and hydrazine as reducing agents, respectively. The Pt/N-G catalyst shows a higher electrocatalytic activity for MOR owing to the smaller particle size and modulated electronic properties of the deposited Pt on N-G. Sun et al.31 synthesized boron-doped graphene (BG) through a thermal annealing method and fabricated Pt/BG catalyst via a microwave-assisted reduction in ethylene glycol solution, showing an enhanced performance of Pt/BG for MOR. It has been demonstrated extensively that graphene and GO based materials are effective electrocatalyst supports in fuel cells32,33,34,35,36,37,38.

Although there are many reports on the use of graphene as Pt catalyst supports for MOR, however, it is still important to further enhance the electrocatalytic performance of Pt/rGO and to explore the new applications of graphene through functionalization. In this work, we developed a facile method to synthesize sulfonic acid-grafted graphene oxide, S-rGO, as effective catalyst supports to prepare Pt/S-rGO electrocatalysts via a self-assembly route. The electrocatalytic properties of Pt/S-rGO catalysts were investigated in detail. The results indicate that the Pt/S-rGO possesses a much higher electrocatalytic activity and better stability towards MOR of DMFCs, as compared with Pt on high surface area Vulcan carbon and on rGO (Pt/VC and Pt/rGO) electrocatalysts.

Results and Discussion

It is well known that GO contains a large amount of oxygen-containing groups such as hydroxyl, epoxy, carboxyl and carbonyl groups, which open up a versatile avenue for a variety of chemical transformations39. Among these groups, epoxy groups on the basal planes of GO can easily react with amines through a ring-opening reaction. In this work, 2-aminoethanesulfonic acid (taurine) was used to functionalize the GO. The process was carried out in aqueous solutions without adding additional organic solvents or surfactants that may generate undesirable byproducts or residues attaching on the surfaces of GO7,40. The zeta potential (ζ) values of the VC, GO, rGO and S-rGO suspensions were measured and the results are listed in Table 1. The zeta potential of VC is −24.8 mV, close to −27.6 mV measured on GO. The S-rGO aqueous suspension at a concentration around 0.01 mg mL−1 under neutral conditions has a zeta potential of −62.4 mV, which is much lower than −10.4 mV observed on rGO, indicating the success of the fuctionalization by taurine and the very good stability of the suspension12,41. Moreover, there is no sign of coagulation of S-rGO sheets after storing in water for 3 months (Fig. S1), indicating the high dispensability of S-rGO in water. Owing to the existence of negatively charged sulfonic acid group on the surface of S-rGO, self-assembly of the added positively charged polycation, poly(diallyldimethylammonium chloride) (PDDA) occurs as the result of the electrostatic interaction42. Thus, the charge inversion takes place on the S-rGO with the self-assembly of the positively charged PDDA monolayer, which can function as anchoring sites for negative charges or ligands. This leads to the self-assembly of the negatively charged Pt precursors, PtCl62−, forming an uniformly distributed Pt precursors on the surfaces of S-rGO. After reduction treatment in NaBH4 solution, uniformly distributed Pt NPs on the S-rGO supports were obtained. The one-pot synthesis route for S-rGO and Pt/S-rGO is shown in Fig. 1.

Table 1. Elemental analysis, electrical conductivity and zeta potential of VC, GO, rGO and S-rGO.

Sample C (wt.%) O (wt.%) H (wt.%) N (wt.%) S (wt.%) σ (S·cm−1) ζ(mV)
VC 98.50 1.24 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 2.1 −24.8
GO 52.65 43.17 4.08 <0.10 <0.10 2.4 × 10−4 −27.6
rGO 85.74 13.06 1.20 <0.10 <0.10 5.2 −10.4
S-rGO 74.63 15.42 2.52 2.26 5.17 4.3 −64.2
Open in a new tab

Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the synthesis of S-rGO and Pt/S-rGO.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

The morphologies of the GO and S-rGO were examined in details by AFM and TEM. The AFM images confirm that the GO and S-rGO are comprised of isolated and well dispersed GO sheets, as shown in Fig. 2. The GO sheets have lateral dimensions of several micrometers and a thickness of 0.8 nm, which is characteristic of a fully exfoliated GO sheet12. The thickness of a single-layer S-rGO sheet is about 1.2 nm. This implies that the taurine groups have been grafted onto GO, giving rise to the thickness increase. The single-layer sheets can also be observed clearly for both GO and S-rGO by TEM (Fig. 3). The corresponding selected-area electron diffraction (SAED) pattern of S-rGO coincides well with the typical SAED pattern of a single layer of rGO (inset in Fig. 3b)43.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

AFM images and cross-sectional analysis of (a) GO and (b) S-rGO.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

TEM images of (a) GO and (b) S-rGO. The inset picture in the top-right part of (b) is the SAED image of S-rGO.

Figure 4 shows the XPS spectra of GO, rGO and S-rGO. As shown in the XPS survey scan of S-rGO, the peaks related to S2p at 168.5 eV and N1s at 399.8 eV can be clearly observed in the spectra of S-rGO (Fig. 4a). The deconvolution for C peaks was carried out by using an XPSPEAK software. A Shirley type background was used and the s peak type was selected. Adjustable parameters for the fitting were peak position, full width at half maximum, peak area and % Lorentzian-Gaussian. Four types of carbons were identified: C-O-C (286.7 eV), C-OH (286.0 eV), C=O (287.7 eV) and O=C-O (289.5 eV) in the spectra of the GO (Fig. 4f), which are in good agreement with the previous reports13,44. After the reduction, the peak intensities from oxygen-related groups decrease significantly (Fig. 4d,e). The peaks at 286.5 eV as shown in Fig. 4d can be attributed to the C-N groups. The results indicate that taurine molecules have been successfully grafted to the GO, consistent with the AFM examinations (Fig. 2).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

(a) XPS survey scan of S-rGO, XPS high resolution scan of (b) N1s, (c) S2p and (d) C1s of S-rGO, and XPS high resolution scan of C1s of (e) rGO and (f) GO.

Figure 5 shows the Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) spectra of GO, rGO and S-rGO. The spectrum of GO illustrates the presence of C-O (vC-O at 1052 cm−1), C-O-C (vC-O-C at 1226 cm−1), C-OH (vC-OH at 1418 cm−1), and C=O in carboxylic acid and carbonyl moieties (vC=O at 1734 cm−1). For the rGO, there are only two peaks at 1178 cm−1 and 1560 cm−1, indicating that the GO has been effectively reduced by NaBH4 in mild conditions. For S-rGO, the absorbance bands at 1044 cm−1 and 1196 cm−1 can be attributed to the symmetric and asymmetric stretching band of -SO3 groups45,46, which evidently demonstrate the successful grafting of taurine molecules on the GO and are in good accord with the AFM, XPS and zeta potential results. Raman spectroscopy for the graphitic modes of carbon provided additional evidence for the structural changes caused by the reactions (Fig. S3). The samples VC, GO, rGO and S-rGO all exhibit D band at around 1586 cm−1, which corresponds to a splitting of the E2g stretching mode and reflects the structural intensity of the sp2-hbridized carbon atoms, and G band at around 1332 cm−1. However, S-rGO shows slightly higher D/G intensity ratio than that of rGO, implying that more small domains of sp2 structure were created, which is consistent with previous reports on functionalized graphene5,47.

Figure 5. FTIR curves of GO, rGO and S-rGO.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

Elemental analysis data (Table 1) indicate that the C, O and H contents in the VC, GO and rGO are within the range reported in literatures5,47,48. The N and S content in S-rGO is 2.3 and 5.2 wt.% of the total mass of S-rGO, respectively, and is evidently due to the grafted taurine molecules. This result indicates that taurine molecules exist in the as-prepared S-rGO composites. The electrical conductivities (σ, S cm−1) of the VC, GO, rGO and S-rGO films were measured by four-point probe method and are also listed in Table 1. The pristine GO shows a conductivity of ~2.4 × 10−4 S cm−1. The electrical conductivity of S-rGO is 4.3 S cm−1, exhibiting a four-order magnitude increase in comparison with that of GO, although it is slightly lower than 5.2 S cm−1 of rGO. The results further verify that the π-conjugated system has been effectively restored in S-rGO after the reduction49.

Figure 6 shows the TEM micrographs and the histograms of Pt NPs for Pt/VC and Pt/S-rGO electrocatalysts. The Pt loading is 20wt%. In the case of Pt/VC, the distribution of Pt NPs on VC is reasonable with slight aggregation and the average particle size of Pt NPs is ~4 nm. For the Pt/S-rGO, the average particle size is ~3.8 nm with symmetrical and uniform distribution. This indicates that S-rGO is an effective supports for Pt NPs. Fig. 7 is the TEM micrographs of 40 wt.% Pt/S-rGO and 80 wt.% Pt/S-rGO electrocatalysts. As can be seen, the average particle size increases slightly with increasing the metal loading. However, the size dispersion is still very uniform even in the case of high Pt loading of 80 wt.%. These results clearly indicate that the sequential functionalization and self-assembly process is very effective for the synthesis of uniform and nano-sized Pt/S-rGO electrocatalysts with high loading owing to the existence of extensive negatively charged sulfonic acid groups on the surface of rGO.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

TEM images of (a) Pt/VC and (c) Pt/S-rGO, and histograms of size distribution of Pt nanoparticles of (b) Pt/VC and (d) Pt/S-rGO. Pt loading was 20 wt.%.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Open in a new tab

TEM images of (a) 40 wt.% Pt/S-rGO and (b) 80 wt.% Pt/S-rGO.

The electrocatalytic activity of the Pt catalysts on the different supports for MOR was examined at 25 °C in a nitrogen-saturated 0.5 M H2SO4 solution in the absence and presence of 1.0 M CH3OH solution and the results are shown in Fig. 8. The electrochemical surface area (ECSA) was obtained from the hydrogen adsorption/desorption area in the CV curves measured in a 0.5 M H2SO4 solution (Fig. 8a). The higher ECSA in general represents the more active sites for the methanol oxidation. The Pt/S-rGO electrocatalyst shows an ECSA with a value of 394.2 cm2 mg−1Pt, much higher than Pt/VC (286.6 cm2 mg−1Pt) and Pt/rGO (292.4 cm2 mg−1Pt). Considering the similar sizes of the Pt NPs supported on S-rGO and VC supports (see Fig. 6), the significantly high ECSA of the Pt/S-rGO may indicate the synergestic effect between Pt NPs and S-rGO supports. As shown in Fig. 8b, the mass specific peak current density for MOR is 206, 263 and 465 mA mg−1 for Pt/VC, Pt/rGO and Pt/S-rGO, respectively. The much higher mass specific catalytic activity of the Pt/S-rGO again indicates that S-rGO plays a significant role to promote the electrocatalytic activity of Pt NPs. Meanwhile, the sulfonic acid groups would be helpful to form hydroxyl groups from water activation, which is essential for removing the metal-poisoning CO molecules from the surfaces of catalysts37,50. This appears to be supported by the high If/Ib (the forward peak current density/the backward peak current density) ratio of Pt/S-rGO (1.0), as compared to If/Ib ratio of Pt/VC (0.65) and Pt/rGO (0.89), as the peak current If/Ib ratio could be used to estimate the CO tolerance on Pt surface.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Open in a new tab

CV curves of the electrocatalysts (a) in a N2-saturated 0.5 M H2SO4 solution at a scan rate of 20 mV s−1, and (b) in a N2-saturated 0.5 M H2SO4 + 1 M CH3OH solution at a scan rate of 50 mV s−1, (c) Tafel plots at a scan rate of 2 mV s−1 and (d) CA curves at 0.6 V vs. SCE for 1800 s in a N2-saturated 0.5 M H2SO4 + 1 M CH3OH solution. Pt loading was 20 wt.%. The green dotted lines in (c) were used as guide to fit the Tafel plots.

The onset potentials are 0.63, 0.60 and 0.57 V for the reaction on Pt/VC, Pt/rGO and Pt/S-rGO, respectively. The negative shift of onset potential indicates an improvement in the electrocatalytic reaction kinetics51,52. Tafel curves (potential vs. log i) were plotted to compare the MOR kinetics of Pt/VC, Pt/rGO and Pt/S-rGO. As shown in Fig. 8c, the Tafel plots can be divided into two nearly linear regions which intersect at approximately 0.55 V for the reaction, indicating a change in the rate determining steps. In the region below 0.55 V, the Tafel slopes of MOR on Pt/VC and Pt/rGO are 122 and 118 mV dec−1, very close to the theoretical value predicted for one-electron transfer reaction as rate determining step. However, for Pt/S-rGO, the Tafel slope in the same region is much higher, 156 mV dec−1, indicating a faster methanol dehydrogenation even at the relatively low overpotential region53.

The stability of the electrocatalysts was evaluated by a chronoamperometry (CA) method at a constant potential 0.6 V vs. SCE (Fig. 8d). As can be seen, polarization current drops significantly with testing time, which is very rapid at the initial stage, followed by a much slower decay. The rapid current decay represents the poisoning effect on the catalyst surface. However, the Pt/S-rGO shows the slowest current decrease among the electrocatalysts studied. After polarized at 0.6 V for 1800 s, the polarization current for the MOR on Pt/S-rGO electrocatalysts is 61 mA mg−1Pt, significantly higher than 22 mA mg−1Pt on Pt/VC and 20 mA mg−1Pt on Pt/rGO. This indicates a better tolerance of Pt/S-rGO electrocatalysts to CO or carbonaceous intermediates formed during the MOR.

The effect of the grafted sulfonic acid groups on the electronic structure of Pt was further studied by XPS and the results are shown in Fig. 9. The Pt4f spectra of the samples can be fitted with the following components: Pt04f7/2, Pt04f5/2, Pt2+4f7/2, Pt2+4f5/2, Pt4+4f7/2 and Pt4+4f5/2. The Pt04f7/2 and Pt04f5/2 peaks of Pt/S-rGO show a negative shift as compared to that on Pt/VC and Pt/rGO. For example, the binding energy for Pt04f7/2 on Pt/S-rGO is 71.7 eV, lower than 71.9 eV observed on Pt/VC and Pt/r-GO. The negative shift of the d-band center of Pt is most likely originated to the grafted sulfonic acid group which is electronegative and may donate electrons to Pt. According to the d-band center theory, the CO adsorption would be weakened as the d-band center decreases54. Thus, the negative shift of d-band center of Pt NPs on S-rGO presents a weaker oxophilicity, facilitating the removal of the adsorbed poisoning intermediates such as COads for MOR55. This is supported by the significantly higher If/Ib ratio and high current density after polarization at 0.6 V for 1800 s (Fig. 8b, d). The oxidation state of Pt NPs was analyzed and calculated based on the XPS Pt4f spectra, and the results are given in Table 2. The Pt/S-rGO electrocatalyst shows the highest metallic contents of Pt (i.e., Pt(0)) that is important for MOR56. The taurine groups assembled on the rGO frameworks significantly enhances the electrocatalytic activity of Pt NPs and facilitate the transfer of electrons and protons for the MOR.

Figure 9.

Figure 9

Open in a new tab

XPS spectra of Pt4f of (a) Pt/VC, (b) Pt/rGO and (c) Pt/S-rGO.

Table 2. Summary of oxidation states for Pt species of different electrocatalysts obtained from XPS analysis.

Sample Pt species on surface Binding energy of Pt4f7/2(eV) Relative intensity (%)
Pt/VC Pt(0) 71.9 33.36
Pt(II) 72.9 18.31
Pt(IV) 74.6 48.33
Pt/rGO Pt(0) 71.9 31.62
Pt(II) 72.7 28.06
Pt(IV) 73.5 40.32
Pt/S-rGO Pt(0) 71.7 38.45
Pt(II) 72.6 27.16
Pt(IV) 74.3 34.39
Open in a new tab

The charge transfer capabilities of the different electrocatalysts were further investigated by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) in a 10 mM K3[Fe(CN)6] + 0.01 M PBS solution. In the Nyquist plots as shown in Fig. 10, the semicircular portion at high frequencies corresponds to the charge transfer limited process and the linear portion at low frequency region can be ascribed to the diffusion process. The impedance data were fitted using an equivalent circuit model with NOVA 1.9 software (Metrohm, Switzerland). The electrode charge transfer resistance, Rct was obtained. The decreased diameter of the semicircle reflects the decrease in the Rct. Based on the equivalent circuit, the Rct values were determined to be 352, 203, 185 and 158 Ω on the bare GCE, Pt/VC Pt/rGO and Pt/S-rGO electrodes, respectively. These results clearly confirm that Rct of Pt/S-rGO is significantly lower as compared to that on Pt/VC and Pt/rGO, most likely due to the good ionic conduction ability of sulfonic acid groups grafted on the rGO.

Figure 10. EIS plots of the GCE and different electrocatalysts in 10 mM K3[Fe(CN)6] + 0.01 M PBS solution.

Figure 10

Open in a new tab

Inset is the equivalent circuit.

Finally, the synthesis method of the current work was compared to relevant reports on the functionalization of graphene and proposed enhancement mechanism for Pt electrocatalysts (see Table 3). There are similar processes to the current work, but the present study is the first time to report taurine functionalized graphene as Pt catalyst support for MOR and to clarify in details the effects of grafted sulfonic acid groups for the promotion of the dispensability of graphene and catalytic effect on the supported Pt NPs. The existence of sulfonic acid groups on graphene not only enhances the dispensability and stability of graphene, and most important, it modifies the electronic structure and negatively shifts the d-band center of Pt, leading to the reduction in charge transfer resistance and enhanced activity of the Pt electrocatalysts for MOR.

Table 3. Comparison of current work and relevant reports on the functionalization of graphene and proposed enhancement mechanism.

Ref. Species and method for functionalizing graphene Synthesis method for catalysts Mechanism for the enhanced performance
27 — Pulsed galvanostatic electrodeposition Synergistic effects
28 — Magnetron sputtering Porous honeycomb-like structure; Large surface area; Enhanced interactions
29 — Chemical reduction Bifunctional effect between Pt NPs and remaining oxygenated groups on graphene
30 Nitrogen-doped; Chemical reduction Chemical reduction Smaller particle size; Modulated electronic properties of Pt
31 Boron-doped; Thermal annealing Microwave-assisted polyol process Uniform deposition of Pt NPs; Lower d-band center
32 Nitrogen-doped; Hydrothermal Hydrothermal Smaller particle size; Stronger binding energy between Pt and N-doped graphene
33 Nitrogen-doped and ZrO2-decorated; Atomic layer deposition Chemical reduction Unique structure
34 Nitrogen-doped; Ultrosonic cavitation assisted hydrogen implosion Chemical reduction Enhanced electronic conductivity; Special structure
Current work Grafted with taurine molecules; One-pot method Self-assembly Smaller particle size and uniform distribution; Lower d-band center; Enhanced charge transfer ability
Open in a new tab

Conclusion

A facile and simple one-pot method was developed to graft taurine molecules onto the basal planes of rGO, and subsequently used as effective Pt catalyst support for MOR via a self-assembly route. The synthesis process was carried out in aqueous solutions without adding any other organic solvents or surfactants. The self-assembled Pt/S-rGO electrocatalyst shows a significantly higher electrocatalytic activity, faster reaction kinetics and a much better stability for MOR in comparison with conventional Pt/VC and Pt/rGO catalysts. The catalytic enhancements could be attributed to the following factors: (1) the presence of large number of sulfuric acid functional group on rGO due to taurine functionalization; (2) uniform deposition of Pt NPs and smaller particle size as result of the self-assembly process; (3) the negative shifted d-band center and increased charge transfer ability due to the grafted sulfonic acid groups. The results in this report indicate that it is feasible to functionalize graphene through the newly developed one-pot method and show the promising potential to enhance the practical applications of graphene as effective catalyst support for MOR in DMFCs.

Methods

Synthesis of S-rGO

GO was prepared from the natural graphite by a modified Hummers method57. The details are provided in the supplementary information. To synthesize S-rGO, 600 mg GO was dispersed into 200 mL deionized (DI) water under ultrasonication. The suspension was centrifuged at 4000 rpm for 30 min to remove the small amount of unexfoliated particles. The obtained supernatant was transferred into a 500 ml flask purged by N2, followed by adding 12 g taurine (≥99.5%, Sigma-Aldrich). The mixture was then heated at 60 °C for 36 h under stirring. After cooling to room temperature, a 200 mL with 0.25M sodium borohydride (NaBH4, Sigma-Aldrich) aqueous solution was added to the mixture under stirring for 4 h. The mixture was then vacuum filtered through 0.2 μm polycarbonate membrane and washed with DI water to remove the residual ions and excessive raw materials. The as-prepared S-rGO was freeze-dried for 48 h and stored in a dry cabinet for further use.

Synthesis of Pt/S-rGO electrocatalysts

S-rGO (400 mg) was first sonicated in 200 mL of isopropanol containing 20 mg of PDDA for 2 h and stored at room temperature overnight. Then the as-prepared solution was filtered using 0.2 μm polycarbonate membrane, washed for several times and were dried in a vacuum oven at 70 °C for 10 h. The collected S-rGO-PDDA (50 mg) was mixed with approximate amount of H2PtCl6 solution under ultrasonication in a beaker, followed by adding 25 mL of 20 mM trisodium citrate under stirring. Then an approximate amount of fresh ice-cold NaBH4 solution was dropwise added into the solution under vigorous stirring. After adding the NaBH4, large amount of gas bubbles were produced and the color of the solution changed from light yellow to dark brown quickly. The solution was then filtered and washed using polycarbonate membrane. The obtained Pt/S-rGO electrocatalysts were dried in a vacuum oven at 70 °C for 20 h. Pt/S-rGO electrocatalysts with different Pt loading (20, 40 and 80 wt.%) were prepared. The 20 wt.% Pt/VC carbon black were synthesized using the same procedures as described above. Pt NPs supported on rGO were prepared by a chemical reduction method using NaBH4 as the reducing agent. Firstly, GO (20 mg) was dispersed in 100 mL DI water by ultrasonication for 30 min before 5 mL H2PtCl6 solution (10 mg/mL) was added to the solution. Excess NaBH4 with a weight of 3 g was slowly added to the solution with magnetic stirring for 24 h at room temperature. The resulting hybrids were separated by filtration and washed with DI water for several times. The Pt loading was controlled at ~20 wt.%.

Characterization

AFM measurements were performed in the tapping mode using Digital Instruments Nanoscope DI 3100. The morphology of the catalysts was studied by a transmission electron microscope (JEOL 2010) operating at 200 kV. FTIR measurements were carried out with a Perkin Elmer Model GX spectrometer. Raman spectra of the different electrocatalysts were obtained by using a Renishaw® RM1000 Raman spectroscope. XPS measurements were performed on a Kratos Analytical AXIS His spectrometer with a monochromatized Al Ka X-ray source (1486.6 eV photons), in a vacuum of 10−8 Torr at a constant dwelling time of 100 ms and pass energy of 40 eV. The anode voltage was 15 mV with a current of 10 mA. All the survey scans and the core-level spectra were obtained at photo-electron take-off angel of 90° (α, with respect to the sample surface). Survey scans were recorded within a range of 0–1200 eV. To compensate for the effects of surface charging, all core-level spectra were referenced to the C1s hydrocarbon peak at 284.5 eV. Elemental analysis was performed using Perkin Elmer Instruments CHNS-O Analyzer. The electrical conductivity of the samples was measured on a resistivity/sheet resistance measurement station (Advanced Instrument Technology, Model: CMT-SR2000N) using a four probe method. The films were prepared by vacuum filtration onto alumina membranes (Millipore, 0.02 μm pore size, 47 mm membrane diameter) supported on a fritted glass holder. After washing with excess DI water, the films were dried in a vacuum oven at 40 °C for 24 h. The thickness of the films was controlled at ~20 μm as measured by using an Alpha-step 500 profilometer. The conductivity was calculated using the formula: σ = 1/(Rst), where Rs is the resistance (unit: Ω) and t is the film thickness (unit: cm). Zeta potential (ζ) was measured on a Zetasizer Nano Series 90 at 25 °C, using a DTS 1060 C disposable capillary cell (Malvern Instruments, UK).

Electrochemical measurements

The electrochemical measurements were carried out in a conventional three-electrode cell using a potentiostat/galvanostat (Autolab PGSTAT30) at ambient temperature. A glassy carbon electrode (GCE, 4 mm in diameter) was used as the working electrode, a platinum wire as the counter electrode, and a saturated calomel electrode (SCE, 0.241 V versus RHE) as the reference electrode. A salt bridge with a Luggin capillary was connected to the reference electrode. To load the electrocatalyst suspension onto GCE, the electrocatalyst powder was ultrasonically mixed in isopropanol to form a homogeneous ink with the catalyst concentration of 5 mg mL−1, followed by dropping 10 μL of the electrocatalyst ink onto the surface of GCE. Then, 10 μL 0.5 wt.% Nafion solution was coated onto the surface to fix the electrocatalysts. Without specification, all the electrochemical potentials reported in the present study were given versus RHE. The ECSA of Pt/S-rGO and Pt/VC electrocatalysts was measured in a nitrogen-saturated 0.5 M H2SO4 solution at a scan rate of 20 mV s−1. The electrocatalytic activity for MOR was characterized by the CV measurements in a nitrogen-purged 0.5 M H2SO4 + 1 M methanol solution at a scan rate of 50 mV s−1. The stability was examined by CA tests at a constant potential of 0.6 V vs. SCE. The EIS was conducted in the frequency range of 1 MHz to 1 Hz under the signal amplitude of 10 mV in 10 mM K3[Fe(CN)6] + 0.01 M phosphate (KH2PO4) buffered saline solution (PBS, pH = 7.4).

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Lu, J. et al. Self-assembled platinum nanopartilces on sulfonic acid-grafted graphene as effective electrocatalysts for methanol oxidation in direct methanol fuel cells. Sci. Rep. 6, 21530; doi: 10.1038/srep21530 (2016).

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Information
srep21530-s1.doc (481KB, doc)

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NO. 51203093, 51374125), the Colleges and Universities Outstanding Young Scholars Growth Plans (NO. LZQ2013031), the Ph.D. Starting Foundation of Liaoning Province (NO. 20141122), Innovative Research Team in College and Universities of Liaoning Province (No. LT2014007) and Australian Research Council (ARC DP150102044 & DP150102025).

Footnotes

Author Contributions J.L. designed the experiments, synthesized the materials and wrote the manuscript; Y.H. carried out the characterization experiments; S.P.J. and S.L. analyzed the data and revised the manuscript; all authors reviewed the manuscript.

References

  1. Novoselov K. S. et al. Electric field in atomically thin carbon films. Science 306, 666–669 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Geim A. K. Graphene: Status and prospects. Science 324, 1530–1534 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Zhang Y. W. et al. Manageable N-doped Graphene for High Performance Oxygen Reduction Reaction. Scientific Reports 3, 1–8 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Novoselov K. S. et al. Two-dimensional gas of massless Dirac fermions in graphene. Nature 438, 197–200 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gao W., Alemany L. B., Ci L. & Ajayan P. M. New insights into the structure and reduction of graphite oxide. Nature Chemistry 1, 403–408 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Wang G., Shen X., Wang B., Yao J. & Park J. Synthesis and characterisation of hydrophilic and organophilic graphene nanosheets. Carbon 47, 1359–1364 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  7. Kuila T. et al. A green approach for the reduction of graphene oxide by wild carrot root. Carbon 50, 914–921 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  8. Stankovich S. et al. Graphene-based composite materials. Nature 442, 282–286 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Stankovich S. et al. Stable aqueous dispersions of graphitic nanoplatelets via the reduction of exfoliated graphite oxide in the presence of poly(sodium 4-styrenesulfonate). Journal of Materials Chemistry 16, 155–158 (2006). [Google Scholar]
  10. Jo K. et al. Stable aqueous dispersion of reduced graphene nanosheets via non-covalent functionalization with conducting polymers and application in transparent electrodes. Langmuir 27, 2014–2018 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Qi X. et al. Conjugated-polyelectrolyte-functionalized reduced graphene oxide with excellent solubility and stability in polar solvents. Small 6, 663–669 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Si Y. & Samulski E. T. Synthesis of water soluble graphene. Nano Letters 8, 1679–1682 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Yang H. et al. Covalent functionalization of chemically converted graphene sheets via silane and its reinforcement. Journal of Materials Chemistry 19, 4632–4638 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  14. He C. Y., Jiang S. P. & Shen P. K. Large-scale and Rapid Synthesis of Disk-Shaped and Nano-Sized Graphene. Scientific Reports 3, 2144 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Lu J., Lu S. & Jiang S. P. Highly ordered mesoporous Nafion membranes for fuel cells. Chemical Communications 47, 3216–3218 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Lu J., Tang H., Xu C. & Jiang S. P. Nafion membranes with ordered mesoporous structure and high water retention properties for fuel cell applications. J. Mater. Chem. 22, 5810–5819 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  17. Li C.-Z. et al. Graphitic carbon nitride nanosheet coated carbon black as a high-performance PtRu catalyst support material for methanol electrooxidation. Journal of Materials Chemistry A 2, 20139–20146 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  18. Lu J., Tang H., Lu S., Wu H. & Jiang S. P. A novel inorganic proton exchange membrane based on self-assembled HPW-meso-silica for direct methanol fuel cells. Journal of Materials Chemistry 21, 6668–6676 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  19. Wu K. et al. Graphene-supported Pd-Pt alloy nanoflowers: In situ growth and their enhanced electrocatalysis towards methanol oxidation. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 40, 6530–6537 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  20. Sun S. H. et al. Single-atom Catalysis Using Pt/Graphene Achieved through Atomic Layer Deposition. Scientific Reports 3, 1–9 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  21. Wang S. Y., Jiang S. P., White T. J., Guo J. & Wang X. Electrocatalytic Activity and Interconnectivity of Pt Nanoparticles on Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes for Fuel Cells. Journal of Physical Chemistry C 113, 18935–18945 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  22. Yuan W. Y., Lu S. F., Xiang Y. & Jiang S. P. Pt-based nanoparticles on non-covalent functionalized carbon nanotubes as effective electrocatalysts for proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Rsc Advances 4, 46265–46284 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  23. Mingmei Zhang Z. Y., Yan L., Junjie J. & Jimin X. Preparation of cobalt silicide on graphene as Pt electrocatalyst supports for highly efficient and stable methanol oxidation in acidic media. Electrochimica Acta 161, 48–54 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  24. Wang H., Jusys Z. & Behm R. J. Ethanol electrooxidation on a carbon-supported Pt catalyst: Reaction kinetics and product yields. Journal of Physical Chemistry B 108, 19413–19424 (2004). [Google Scholar]
  25. Kongkanand A., Vinodgopal K., Kuwabata S. & Kamat P. V. Highly dispersed Pt catalysts on single-walled carbon nanotubes and their role in methanol oxidation. Journal of Physical Chemistry B 110, 16185–16188 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Zhang J. et al. Significant promotion effect of carbon nanotubes on the electrocatalytic activity of supported Pd NPs for ethanol oxidation reaction of fuel cells: the role of inner tubes. Chem. Commun. 50, 13732–13734 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Woo S. et al. Electrochemical deposition of Pt/graphene catalyst for improved methanol oxidation, Current Applied Physics 15, 219–225 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  28. Shang N., Papakonstantinou P., Wang P. & Silva S. R. P. Platinum integrated graphene for methanol fuel cells, J.Phys. Chem. C 114, 15837–15841 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  29. Li Y., Gao W., Ci L., Wang C. & Ajayan P. M. Catalytic performance of Pt nanoparticles on reduced graphene oxide for methanol electro-oxidtion, Carbon 48, 1124–1130 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  30. Zhao Y., Zhou Y., O’Hayre R. & Shao Z. Electrocatalytic oxidation of methanol on Pt catalyst supported on nitrogen-doped graphene induced by hydrozine reduction, Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids 74, 1608–1614 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  31. Sun Y. et al. Boron-doped graphene as promising support for platinum catalyst with superior activity towards the methanol electrooxidation reaction, Journal of Power Sources 300, 245–253 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  32. Tao L., Dou S., Ma Z., Shen A. & Wang S. Simultaneous Pt deposition and nitrogen doping of graphene as efficient and durable electrocatalysts for methanol oxidation, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 40, 14371–14377 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  33. Cheng N. et al. High stability and activity of Pt electrocatalyst on atomic layer deposited metal oxide/nitrogen-doped graphene hybrid support, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 39, 15967–15974 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  34. Zhang Y., Zhang X. & Chen J. Ultrasonic cavitation assisted hydrogen implosion synthesis of Pt nanoparticles/nitrogen-doped graphene nanohybrid scrolls and their electrocatalytic oxidation of methanol, Ionics 21, 1287–1294 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  35. Wang R.-X. et al. Platinum nanoparticles on porphyrin functionalized graphene nanosheets as a superior catalyst for methanol electrooxidation Nanoscale 6, 14999–15007 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Huang C. & Shi G. Q. Graphene based catalysts Energy & Environmental Science 5, 8848–8868 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  37. Huang H. & Wang X. Recent progress on carbon-based support materials for electrocatalysts of direct methanol fuel cells. Journal of Materials Chemistry A 2, 6266–6291 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  38. Li Z. S., Li Y. Y., Jiang S. P., He G. Q. & Shen P. K. Novel graphene-like nanosheet supported highly active electrocatalysts with ultralow Pt loadings for oxygen reduction reaction. Journal of Materials Chemistry A 2, 16898–16904 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  39. Wang S. et al. Band-like transport in surface-functionalized highly solution-processable graphene nanosheets. Advanced Materials 20, 3440–3446 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  40. Fan Z. J. et al. Facile synthesis of graphene nanosheets via fe reduction of exfoliated graphite oxide. ACS Nano 5, 191–198 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Yang F., Liu Y., Gao L. & Sun J. pH-Sensitive Highly Dispersed Reduced Graphene Oxide Solution Using Lysozyme via an in Situ Reduction Method, J. Phys. Chem. C, 114, 22085–22091 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  42. Xiang Y., Lu S. & Jiang S. P. Layer-by-layer self-assembly in the development of electrochemical energy conversion and storage devices from fuel cells to supercapacitors. Chem. Soc. Rev. 41, 7291–7321 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Meyer J. C. et al. The structure of suspended graphene sheets. Nature 446, 60–63 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Compton O. C., Dikin D. A., Putz K. W., Brinson L. C. & Nguyen S. T. Electrically conductive “alkylated” graphene paper via chemical reduction of amine-functionalized graphene oxide paper. Advanced Materials 22, 892–896 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Jiang D. D., Yao Q., McKinney M. A. & Wilkie C. A. TGA/FTIR studies on the thermal degradation of some polymeric sulfonic and phosphonic acids and their sodium salts. Polymer Degradation and Stability 63, 423–434 (1999). [Google Scholar]
  46. Yin W. & Ruckenstein E. Soluble polyaniline co-doped with dodecyl benzene sulfonic acid and hydrochloric acid. Synthetic Metals 108, 39–46 (2000). [Google Scholar]
  47. Shin H. J. et al. Efficient reduction of graphite oxide by sodium borohydride and its effect on electrical conductance. Advanced Functional Materials 19, 1987–1992 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  48. Senthil Kumar S. M., J. S. H., Irusta S. & Scott K. The effect of pretreatment of Vulcan XC-72R carbon on morphology and electrochemical oxygen reduction kinetics of supported Pd nano-particle in acidic electrolyte. Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry 647, 211–221 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  49. Liu W. S. et al. Lignin-assisted direct exfoliation of graphite to graphene in aqueous media and its application in polymer composites. Carbon 83, 188–197 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  50. Wang Z. et al. Facile preparation of a Pt/Prussian blue/graphene composite and its application as an enhanced catalyst for methanol oxidation. Electrochimica Acta 121, 245–252 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  51. Shao L., Jeon J. W. & Lutkenhaus J. L. Polyaniline/vanadium pentoxide layer-by-layer electrodes for energy storage. Chemistry of Materials 24, 181–189 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  52. Zhang Z., Liu J., Gu J., Su L. & Cheng L. An overview of metal oxide materials as electrocatalysts and supports for polymer electrolyte fuel cells. Energy & Environmental Science 7, 2535–2558 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  53. Bo Z., Hu D., Kong J., Yan J. & Cen K. Performance of vertically oriented graphene supported platinum–ruthenium bimetallic catalyst for methanol oxidation. Journal of Power Sources 273, 530–537 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  54. Hammer B. & Nørskov J. K. Electronic factors determining the reactivity of metal surfaces, Surface Science 343, 211–220 (1995). [Google Scholar]
  55. Wang D., Lu S., Xiang Y. & Jiang S. P. Self-assembly of HPW on Pt/C nanoparticles with enhanced electrocatalysis activity for fuel cell applications. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 103, 311–317 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  56. Park S. H., Yang H. N., Lee D. C., Park K. W. & Kim W. J. Electrochemical properties of polyethyleneimine-functionalized Pt-PEI/carbon black as a catalyst for polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell, Electrochimica Acta 125, 141–148 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  57. Hummers W. S. Jr. & Offeman R. E. Preparation of graphitic oxide. Journal of the American Chemical Society 80, 1339 (1958). [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information
srep21530-s1.doc (481KB, doc)

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES