Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Feb 15.
Published in final edited form as: Proteomics. 2008 Jun;8(12):2430–2446. doi: 10.1002/pmic.200701029

Comparative proteomic analysis of PAI-1 and TNF-alpha-derived endothelial microparticles

Danielle B Peterson 1, Tara Sander 1, Sushma Kaul 1, Bassam T Wakim 2, Brian Halligan 3, Simon Twigger 3,4,5, Kirkwood A Pritchard Jr 1, Keith T Oldham 1,*, Jing-Song Ou 1
PMCID: PMC4753841  NIHMSID: NIHMS130773  PMID: 18563738

Abstract

Endothelium-derived microparticles (EMPs) are small vesicles released from endothelial cells in response to cell injury, apoptosis, or activation. Elevated concentrations of EMPs have been associated with many inflammatory and vascular diseases. EMPs also mediate long range signaling and alter downstream cell function. Unfortunately, the molecular and cellular basis of microparticle production and downstream cell function is poorly understood. We hypothesize that EMPs generated by different agonists will produce distinct populations of EMPs with unique protein compositions. To test this hypothesis, different EMP populations were generated from human umbilical vein endothelial cells by stimulation with plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 (PAI-1) or tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) and subjected to proteomic analysis by LC/MS. We identified 432 common proteins in all EMP populations studied. Also identified were 231 proteins unique to control EMPs, 104 proteins unique to PAI-1 EMPs and 70 proteins unique to TNF-α EMPs. Interestingly, variations in protein abundance were found among many of the common EMP proteins, suggesting that differences exist between EMPs on a relative scale. Finally, gene ontology (GO) and KEGG pathway analysis revealed many functional similarities and few differences between the EMP populations studied. In summary, our results clearly indicate that EMPs generated by PAI-1 and TNF-α produce EMPs with overlapping but distinct protein compositions. These observations provide fundamental insight into the mechanisms regulating the production of these particles and their physiological role in numerous diseases.

Keywords: EMP, Microparticles, PAI-1, TNF-alpha

1 Introduction

Endothelial microparticles (EMPs) contain fragments of the endothelial cell plasma membrane ranging in size from 0.1 to 3 μm [1]. They are released into the blood stream by endothelial cells upon activation, injury, or apoptosis [2] and have been described in a number of human disease states. Other components of the vascular system, including erythrocytes [3, 4], leukocytes [3, 5], lymphocytes [6, 7], platelets [8, 9], and vascular smooth muscle cells [10, 11], release microparticles (MP) into the circulation. All MP are composed of a phospholipid bilayer and cell surface proteins that reflect their cell of origin. For example, MP derived from endothelial cells have cell surface markers consistent with those found on endothelial cells such as CD 31/platelet-endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1 (PECAM-1) or CD 62 (E-selectin) [1, 12]. Another common feature of MP is that they are composed of a phospholipid bilayer that has an asymmetrical distribution of negatively charged particles such as phosphatidylserine. MP were originally described by Wolf in 1967 [13] and initially thought of as “cell dust” or debris. However, recent reports by our group and others suggest that their generation is an active process that involves the directed packaging of proteins from numerous cellular compartments [14, 15]. Cells stimulated by agonists such as plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 (PAI-1) [16] or tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) [1] yield an increase in the number of MP produced by endothelial cells, although the mechanism by which MP are released from the cell into the blood stream has yet to be fully elucidated. Understanding the protein composition of EMPs generated by different agonists will provide insight into the biological processes mediating EMP formation and release into the circulation, as well as their downstream effects.

It is clear from the literature that EMPs can serve not only as markers of disease, but also that these MP are effectors of cellular function. EMPs have been found to initiate coagulation [1, 14], regulate angiogenesis [17, 18], alter endothelial cell proliferation and migration [19], impair endothelial cell function [20, 21] as well as induce acute lung injury (ALI) in a Brown Norway rat model [21]. MP are known to be present at low levels in the plasma of healthy individuals. Elevated concentrations of EMPs have been linked to many inflammatory and vascular diseases including diabetes [22], renal failure [23], acute myocardial infarction [24], cancer [25], vasculitis [26], and sickle cell disease [27]. In addition, the EMPs of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and antiphospholipid syndrome have a significant increase in quantity as well as procoagulant activity as compared to the EMPs of healthy individuals [28]. This suggests that EMP function may be different in diseased patients as compared to healthy controls.

In order to gain insight into the possible mechanisms by which EMPs can alter downstream cell function, it is important to determine their protein composition. Of course, in vivo EMP generation does not occur in the presence of a simple agonist, however the initial phase of inquiry into this complex issue is to comparatively analyze the protein composition of EMPs generated in vitro by different agonists. The proteome of TNF-α [14] or PAI-1 [15] generated EMPs has been reported independently by our group and others, but the EMP populations from these different stimuli have never been comparatively analyzed. While the previously published EMP proteomes provide initial insight into the potential functions of EMPs, they are by no means comprehensive, list secondary to the limitations and differences in the methodologies employed by these studies. The goal of this current study is to comprehensively compare the proteome of EMPs from unstimulated endothelial cells and endothelial cells stimulated by PAI-1 or TNF-α using the sensitive and state-of-the-art method of LC/MS. This will afford additional perspective into the mechanism by which EMPs are produced by different agonists with potentially distinct functions and downstream effects. Such understanding is fundamental toward designing and developing diagnostic tools and potential therapies for the treatment of diseases associated with elevated levels of EMPs.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 EMP generation

Endothelial MP were generated in vitro from human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) (Clonetics) as described previously [15, 21]. Briefly, cells were grown in gelatin coated T75 flasks (passage 4–6) in M199 media (Invitrogen) supplemented with 20% FBS (Lonza), 0.01% Heparin (Sigma), 0.05% Endothelial Mitogen (Biomedical Technologies), and 1% Penstrep:Glutamine (Invitrogen). At 100% confluence, the cells were washed with Hank’s balanced salt solution (HBSS without Ca2+ and Mg2+) and incubated in EBM-2 base media (Lonza), without any additives, for 2 h. Cultured flasks were divided into three groups. The media was discarded and replaced with fresh EBM-2 base media. One group was treated as control (no agonist). The other two groups were supplemented with either 10 ng/mL plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) or 10 ng/ mL TNF-α. All flasks were maintained for 3 h at 37°C in an incubator with 5% CO2. The HUVEC conditioned media was then collected for isolation of EMPs by serial centrifugation.

The media containing EMPs was collected in 50 mL conical tubes and centrifuged at room temperature for 4 min at 200 × g to remove cell debris. The supernatant was then transferred into 90 mL polycarbonate bottles (Kendro) and ultracentrifuged (Sorval) at 4°C for 1 h at 100 000 × g. The EMP pellet was resuspended in HBSS (20 μL/T75 flask) and stored at 4°C for further use (not more than 72 h).

2.2 EMP disruption and protein identification

EMPs are suspended in MOPS disruption buffer with protease (1X) and phosphatase inhibitors (1X) (Sigma). Disruption was completed by sonicating the pellet twice for 30 s each at 4°C using a dismembranator (Fisher). The sample was then centrifuged for 10 min at 20 000 × g to pellet the insoluble protein fraction. The supernatant containing soluble proteins was used for the protein analysis. An aliquot of the sample (25 μL) was used for protein estimation using a BCA-protein assay kit (Pierce). The protein sample (50 μg) from each group was electrophoresed into a 10% Criterion gel (BioRad) for 10–15 min at 150 V. The gel was then washed with water and silver stained. The stained protein area of the gel was excised and washed twice in deionized water for 10 min each. This was followed by two additional 15 min washes in water containing 50 mM sodium thiosulfate (Sigma) and 15 mM potassium ferricyanide (Sigma). The gel piece was then washed repeatedly with water to completely remove the color. A final wash was performed in 50% ACN with 10 mM ammonium bicarbonate. The washed and destained gel piece was dried then soaked in 100 μL of 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate (Fisher) containing 1 μg trypsin (Promega). Digestion of proteins in the gel was carried out overnight at 37°C. The digested proteins were extracted by sonicating the gel piece for 15 min in 70% ACN (Fisher) in MS water and 0.1% formic acid (Fisher). This extraction procedure was repeated three times. The extracts were pooled together, dried, and reconstituted to 20 μL in 6 M guanidine-HCl (Pierce), 5 mM potassium phosphate, pH 6.5 (Sigma). The sample was further purified using a C18 ZipTip (Millipore) in preparation for the LC/MS analysis. Nano-HPLC-MS was performed using an LTQ mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher) in line with a Surveyor HPLC system (Thermo Fisher) equipped with a Finnigan Micro AS autosampler. An Aquasil, C18 PicoFrit capillary column (75 μm × 9.8 cm; New Objective) was used in these experiments. Samples were applied to the column in the presence of solvent A (5% ACN in MS water and 0.1% formic acid). Peptides were resolved using a linear gradient from 100% solvent A to 80% solvent B (5% MS water and 95% ACN containing 0.1% formic acid) over 180 min at a flow rate of 0.2 μL/ min. After each sample the column was washed for 1 h with solvent A. Ions eluted from the column were electrosprayed into the ion transfer tube of the mass spectrometer at a voltage of 1.75 kV. The capillary voltage was 15 V and the temperature was kept at 200°C. A full mass spectrum (400–2000 m/z) was followed by fragmentation of the 7 most abundant peaks from the full scan spectrum, using 35% of the normalized collision energy for obtaining MS/MS spectra. The MS/MS data were searched using the SEQUEST (Version 27; Thermo Fisher) algorithm against the human subset of the UniProt database (Version 49.1; www.uniprot.org/). The search was limited to tryptic peptides and protein identifications were filtered from the search results using the Epitomize Program, which can be licensed with Visualize software as part of the ZoomQuant package for no fee through the Medical College of Wisconsin (http://proteomics.mcw.edu/zoomquant/) [29].

2.3 Data analysis

The proteins identified by LC/MS-MS were analyzed using Visualize software (Medical College of Wisconsin) as described above [29]. Proteins with a combined Protein Probability value of ≥0.95 were considered for further analysis as this indicates these proteins to be a true positive. The false discovery rate (FDR) for proteins with a Protein Probability value of ≥0.95 was 2.5% as determined by searching against a decoy database as previously described [30]. Protein TIC value (total TIC) for a given protein represents the summation of the TICs for all of the spectra above the probability threshold that were assigned to that protein.

The Uniprot IDs of the proteins identified via the MS/ MS analysis were used to annotate the proteins with their corresponding gene ontology (GO) annotations using Apropos software (available through the Medical College of Wisconsin, http://apropos.mcw.edu). The annotations were obtained from the GOA Human gene association file downloaded from the Gene Ontology Consortium in October 2007. For the purposes of this analysis, all evidence codes were included. The enrichment of the specific GO annotations was calculated using the hypergeometric distribution with the whole human genome used as the reference annotation set. A Bonferroni multiple testing correction was applied to the resulting p-values and values less than or equal to 0.01 are considered significant. A similar analysis strategy was applied to the KEGG pathway annotations. Pathway analysis was also done using Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) version 5.5 (Ingenuity Systems, Redwood City, CA). UniProt accession numbers for all proteins with probability scores of >0.9 for all three samples were mapped to gene names and used in both Biological Function and Canonical Pathway comparisons of the three samples.

MS and data analysis parameters as well as all software programs are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1.

MS and Data analysis parameters

Parameter Value
Program used to collect data Xcalibur 4 (Thermo Fisher)
Program used to create peak lists Extract_ms (Thermo Fisher)
Parameters used to generate peak lists -B600 -T3500 -M1.4 -S1 -G1 -I15 -E250
Program used for Database searches Sequest V 27 (Thermo Fisher)
Parameters used for Database searches Enzyme: Trypsin (KR)
Peptide mass tolerance: 2.5 Da
Fragment mass tolerance: 0.0 Da
Differential search options M16, C57
Max missed cleavage sites: 3
Database Searched Uniprot Human V49.1 (www.uniprot.org/)
Program used to filter data and assign protein probability scores Epitomize V 2 (Medical College of Wisconsin, http://proteomics.mcw.edu/zoomquant/)
Program used to combine and compare data from multiple mass spectrometer runs Visualize V0.5 (Medical College of Wisconsin, http://proteomics.mcw.edu/zoomquant/)
Program used for GO annotation and KEGG pathway analysis Apropos (Medical College of Wisconsin, http://apropos.mcw.edu)
Program used for biological function and canonical pathway analysis Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) version 5.5 (Ingenuity Systems).

3 Results and discussion

3.1 Protein composition of EMP populations

In order to determine if the protein compositions of EMPs change as a result of the stimulus used to generate EMPs, LC/MS-MS was used to comprehensively identify the protein composition of EMPs generated using no agonist (control EMPs), PAI-1 generated EMPs, and TNF-α generated EMPs. A total of 783 proteins were identified in the control EMP proteome, 679 proteins from PAI-1 generated EMPs, and 643 proteins from TNF-α generated EMPs (see Fig. 1). All MS and data analysis parameters are provided in Table 1. In addition, Tables S1–S3 of Supporting Information provide a complete list of all identified proteins with their respective peptide counts, scan counts, and percent coverage. We identified significantly more proteins than have been identified in previous proteomic reports [14, 15]. This study identified 23 (39.7%) of the proteins previously identified from the PAI-1 generated EMP proteome (see Table S2 of Supporting Information) [15]. Similarly, 38 (49.4%) of the proteins previously identified in TNF-α generated EMPs were identified using LC/MS-MS (see Table S3 of Supporting Information) [14]. The most likely explanation for the increase in total protein identification reported here is that the more sensitive technique of LC/MS-MS was employed in these studies. Heterogeneity among the EMP populations and inherent limitations of MS sampling likely explains why the entire EMP proteome identified in previous studies [14, 15] are not represented here.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Venn diagram of number of proteins identified in control EMPs, TNF-α generated EMPs, and PAI-1 generated EMPs. EMPs were generated from HUVECs via stimulation with no agonist (control), PAI-1, or TNF-α. Proteins were identified in each EMP population by LTQ nanospray-LC/MS-MS (n = 4 control EMPs; n = 5 PAI-1 generated EMPs; n = 5 TNF-α generated EMP). The diagram is labeled with the number of proteins identified as well as the percentage of the proteins identified based on the total number of proteins within each respective section of the diagram.

All three EMP populations contain proteins, ranging from 25 to 30% of the proteome, that are actually known to be expressed in endothelial cells (see Tables S1–S3 of Supporting Information) [31]. Each EMP population generated with a different agonist has a unique protein composition. Twenty-two percent, or 231 of the proteins identified are unique to the control group of EMPs. In comparison, 10% or 104 of the proteins identified are unique to PAI-1 generated EMPs, and 6.7% or 70 proteins identified are unique to TNF-α generated EMPs. All of the unique proteins identified in control EMPs, PAI-1 EMPs, and TNF-α EMPs are listed in Tables 2-4. Given our recent report that EMPs induce ALI in a rat model [21], analysis identified two proteins of interest: transferrin receptor protein 1 from control EMPs and heat-shock 70 kDa protein 1 from TNF-α EMPs. These proteins have been linked to ALI. Specifically, the expression of transferrin receptor proteins is known to be increased in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome, and is thought to diminish oxidative stress which is a known contributing mechanism to ALI [32]. Similarly, heat-shock 70 kDa protein has been shown to play a protective role in models of acute respiratory distress syndrome [33, 34].

Table 2.

Proteins identified unique to control EMPs

Reference Accession no. Protein name TIC
1A02_HUMAN P01892 HLA class I histocompatibility antigen 30 994.6
2ABA_HUMAN P63151 Serine/threonine-protein phosphatase 18 880.1
AAAT_HUMAN Q15758 Neutral amino acid transporter B 31 927.8
ACOT9_HUMAN Q9Y305 Acyl-coenzyme A thioesterase 9 36 741.1
ADPGK_HUMAN Q9BRR6 ADP-dependent glucokinase 7808
AKIP_HUMAN Q9NWT8 Aurora kinase A-interacting protein 9668.9
AL7A1_HUMAN P49419 α-Aminoadipic semialdehyde dehydrogenase 38 385
ARLY_HUMAN P04424 Argininosuccinate lyase 12 616.5
ASNS_HUMAN P08243 Asparagine synthetase 7732.1
AT2A2_HUMAN P16615 ER calcium ATPase 2 48 719.7
AVEN_HUMAN Q9NQS1 Cell death regulator Aven 51 921.3
BCAT2_HUMAN O15382 Branched-chain amino acid aminotransferase, mitochondrial precursor 15 250.3
BCL9_HUMAN O00512 B-cell lymphoma 9 protein 11 352.1
BID_HUMAN P55957 BH3-interacting domain death agonist 18 864
CAPS1_HUMAN Q9ULU8 Calcium-dependent secretion activator 1 18 330.1
CAPZB_HUMAN P47756 F-actin-capping protein subunit-β 34 806.6
CATC_HUMAN P53634 Dipeptidyl-peptidase 1 precursor 32 905.7
CD81_HUMAN P60033 CD81 antigen 7444.4
CDC37_HUMAN Q16543 Hsp90 co-chaperone Cdc37 6736.4
CDIPT_HUMAN O14735 CDP-diacylglycerol–inositol 3-phosphatidyltransferase 8319.7
CHD2_HUMAN O14647 Chromodomain-helicase DNA-binding protein 2 10 725.7
CILP2_HUMAN Q8IUL8 Cartilage intermediate layer protein 2 precursor 4985.9
CJ070_HUMAN Q9NZ45 CDGSH iron sulfur domain-containing protein 1 7602.6
CKLF6_HUMAN Q9NX76 CKLF-like MARVEL transmembrane domain-containing protein 6 9380.8
CLPX_HUMAN O76031 ATP-dependent Clp protease ATP-binding subunit clpX-like, mitochondrial precursor 14 317
CMC1_HUMAN O75746 Calcium-binding mitochondrial carrier protein Aralar1 21 042.2
CNN2_HUMAN Q99439 Calponin-2 9245.1
COMT_HUMAN P21964 Catechol O-methyltransferase 11 550.3
COTL1_HUMAN Q14019 Coactosin-like protein 8445.7
COX6C_HUMAN P09669 Cytochrome c oxidase polypeptide VIc precursor 14 907.7
CPNE3_HUMAN O75131 Copine-3 63 379
CPT1A_HUMAN P50416 Carnitine O-palmitoyltransferase I 11 394
CPT2_HUMAN P23786 Carnitine O-palmitoyltransferase 2 8983.7
CRIP2_HUMAN P52943 Cysteine-rich protein 2 14 039.6
CT022_HUMAN Q8N2K0 Abhydrolase domain-containing protein 12 8523.1
CTL2_HUMAN Q8IWA5 Choline transporter-like protein 2 16 668.2
CUL4A_HUMAN Q13619 Cullin-4A 10 036.2
CX4NB_HUMAN O43402 Neighbor of COX4 15 031.5
CY1_HUMAN P08574 Cytochrome c1 heme protein, mitochondrial precursor 30 523.1
CYB_HUMAN P00156 Cytochrome b 8721.9
D3D2_HUMAN P42126 3,2-trans-Enoyl-CoA isomerase, mitochondrial precursor 9947.5
DC1L1_HUMAN Q9Y6G9 Cytoplasmic dynein 1 light intermediate chain 1 8099.9
DCXR_HUMAN Q7Z4W1 l-xylulose reductase 21 826.4
DNJCD_HUMAN O75165 DnaJ homolog subfamily C member 13 7074.2
DPM1_HUMAN O60762 Dolichol-phosphate mannosyltransferase 31 085.1
DPYL2_HUMAN Q16555 Dihydropyrimidinase-related protein 2 7181.2
EDG1_HUMAN P21453 Sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor Edg-1 18 866.8
EFHD1_HUMAN Q9BUP0 EF-hand domain-containing protein 1 8327.1
EHD3_HUMAN Q9NZN3 EH domain-containing protein 3 10 396.4
ERD21_HUMAN P24390 ER lumen protein retaining receptor 1 8209.9
ERG7_HUMAN P48449 Lanosterol synthase 9864.7
ERO1A_HUMAN Q96HE7 ERO1-like protein α-precursor 50 453.4
F10A1_HUMAN P50502 Hsc70-interacting protein 6322.6
FALZ_HUMAN Q12830 Nucleosome-remodeling factor subunit BPTF 4769.7
FKB11_HUMAN Q9NYL4 FK506-binding protein 11 precursor 6478.2
FKBP2_HUMAN P26885 FK506-binding protein 2 precursor 7629.6
FOXE1_HUMAN O00358 Forkhead box protein E1 5485.3
FSHP1_HUMAN Q92674 Centromere protein I 34 948.6
FUBP2_HUMAN Q92945 Far upstream element-binding protein 2 12 317.2
G6PD_HUMAN P11413 Glucose-6-phosphate 1-dehydrogenase 6507.7
G6PE_HUMAN O95479 GDH/6PGL endoplasmic bifunctional protein precursor 9999.1
GALT1_HUMAN Q10472 Polypeptide N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 53 048.7
GALT2_HUMAN Q10471 Polypeptide N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 2 9890.4
GAN_HUMAN Q9H2C0 Gigaxonin 10 382.9
GIMA1_HUMAN Q8WWP7 GTPase IMAP family member 1 17 434.6
GIMA4_HUMAN Q9NUV9 GTPase IMAP family member 4 30 626.4
GNA13_HUMAN Q14344 Guanine nucleotide-binding protein α-13 subunit 18 203.6
GNAQ_HUMAN P50148 Guanine nucleotide-binding protein G(q) subunit-α 12 849.4
GNPAT_HUMAN O15228 Dihydroxyacetone phosphate acyltransferase 17 857.3
GOT1B_HUMAN Q9Y3E0 Vesicle transport protein GOT1B 22 845.7
GPI8_HUMAN Q92643 GPI-anchor transamidase precursor 8474.6
GSLG1_HUMAN Q92896 Golgi apparatus protein 1 precursor 8259.1
GSTK1_HUMAN Q9Y2Q3 GSTκ 1 13 196.9
GTR1_HUMAN P11166 Solute carrier family 2, facilitated glucose transporter member 1 9697.9
H12_HUMAN P16403 Histone H1.2 10 648.9
H13_HUMAN P16402 Histone H1.3 10 588.7
HEXA_HUMAN P06865 β-Hexosaminidase α-chain precursor 4790.5
HEXB_HUMAN P07686 β-Hexosaminidase β-chain precursor 44 696.5
HPCA_HUMAN P84074 Neuron-specific calcium-binding protein hippocalcin 5485.2
HS105_HUMAN Q92598 Heat-shock protein 105 kDa 31 625.6
HYEP_HUMAN P07099 Epoxide hydrolase 1 15 510.7
IF2B_HUMAN P20042 Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2 subunit 2 6551.9
IF3I_HUMAN Q9Y262 Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 subunit 6-interacting protein 17 844.5
IMA4_HUMAN O00629 Importin subunit-α-4 18 660.5
IPYR2_HUMAN Q9H2U2 Inorganic pyrophosphatase 2, mitochondrial precursor 32 618.6
ITA6_HUMAN P23229 Integrin α-6 precursor 9834.6
ITB3_HUMAN P05106 Integrin β-3 precursor 37 183.4
JAM1_HUMAN Q9Y624 Junctional adhesion molecule A precursor 23 813.4
KCD12_HUMAN Q96CX2 BTB/POZ domain-containing protein KCTD12 5322.3
KCY_HUMAN P30085 UMP-CMP kinase 21 553
LAMC1_HUMAN P11047 Laminin subunit-γ-1 precursor 8384.3
LCB1_HUMAN O15269 Serine palmitoyltransferase 1 44 771.1
LCB2_HUMAN O15270 Serine palmitoyltransferase 2 13 951.1
LETM1_HUMAN O95202 Leucine zipper-EF-hand-containing transmembrane protein 1 102 800.4
LRC8A_HUMAN Q8IWT6 Leucine-rich repeat-containing protein 8A 5524.6
LYRIC_HUMAN Q86UE4 Protein LYRIC 14 411.6
M6PBP_HUMAN O60664 Mannose-6-phosphate receptor-binding protein 1 17 737.2
MAGBA_HUMAN Q96LZ2 Melanoma-associated antigen B10 13 155.4
MARCS_HUMAN P29966 Myristoylated alanine-rich C-kinase substrate 6761.5
MCCC2_HUMAN Q9HCC0 Methylcrotonoyl-CoA carboxylase β-chain, mitochondrial precursor 16 404
MDHC_HUMAN P40925 Malate dehydrogenase, cytoplasmic 3436.2
MESD2_HUMAN Q14696 Mesoderm development candidate 2 16 093.2
MGST1_HUMAN P10620 Microsomal GST 1 14 198.8
MGST2_HUMAN Q99735 Microsomal GST 2 4816.8
MINP1_HUMAN Q9UNW1 Multiple inositol polyphosphate phosphatase 1 precursor 9538.3
MMP1_HUMAN P03956 Interstitial collagenase precursor 141 867.5
MPPA_HUMAN Q10713 Mitochondrial-processing peptidase α subunit 28 196.5
MRP5_HUMAN O15440 Multidrug resistance-associated protein 5 16 717.4
MTX1_HUMAN Q13505 Metaxin-1 7487.1
MYO7A_HUMAN Q13402 Myosin-VIIa 17 899
MYO9B_HUMAN Q13459 Myosin-IXb 24 284.9
NB5M_HUMAN 42 319.2
NCLN_HUMAN Q969V3 Nicalin precursor 40 879.5
NI2M_HUMAN Q9Y6M9 NADH dehydrogenase (ubiquinone) 1-β-subcomplex subunit 9 6197.3
NICA_HUMAN Q92542 Nicastrin precursor 60 611.1
NIDM_HUMAN O96000 NADH dehydrogenase (ubiquinone) 1-β-subcomplex subunit 10 34 170.2
NIPS1_HUMAN Q9BPW8 Protein NipSnap1 36 764.3
NIPS2_HUMAN O75323 Protein NipSnap2 7204.1
NLTP_HUMAN P22307 Nonspecific lipid-transfer protein 19 383.6
NMDZ1_HUMAN Q05586 Glutamate (NMDA) receptor subunit-ζ-1 precursor 18 973.7
NPC1_HUMAN O15118 Niemann-Pick C1 protein precursor 32 284.3
NRDC_HUMAN O43847 Nardilysin precursor 15 906.1
NU2M_HUMAN P03891 NADH-ubiquinone oxidoreductase chain 2 11 552.3
NUCM_HUMAN O75306 NADH dehydrogenase (ubiquinone) iron-sulfur protein 2 17 946.8
NUDM_HUMAN O95299 NADH dehydrogenase (ubiquinone) 1-α-subcomplex subunit 10 34 228.4
NUKM_HUMAN O75251 NADH dehydrogenase (ubiquinone) iron-sulfur protein 7 6697.2
NUYM_HUMAN O43181 NADH dehydrogenase (ubiquinone) iron-sulfur protein 4 10 494.6
OAT_HUMAN P04181 Ornithine aminotransferase 21 921.7
ODO2_HUMAN P36957 Dihydrolipoyllysine-residue succinyltransferase component of 2-oxoglutarate dehydrogenase complex 172 525.6
ODPA_HUMAN P08559 Pyruvate dehydrogenase E1 component α-subunit, somatic form 41 851.8
OFUT1_HUMAN Q9H488 GDP-fucose protein O-fucosyltransferase 1 precursor 49 430.7
OFUT2_HUMAN Q9Y2G5 GDP-fucose protein O-fucosyltransferase 2 precursor 8774.8
OSTF1_HUMAN Q92882 Osteoclast-stimulating factor 1 9496.5
P4HA2_HUMAN O15460 Prolyl 4-hydroxylase subunit-α-2 precursor 20 283.1
PCDGM_HUMAN Q9Y5F6 Protocadherin-γ-C5 precursor 26 803.1
PCYOX_HUMAN Q9UHG3 Prenylcysteine oxidase 1 precursor 44 449.7
PDCD7_HUMAN Q8N8D1 Programmed cell death protein 7 16 635.4
PDCD8_HUMAN O95831 Apoptosis-inducing factor 1 48 808.6
PEBP_HUMAN P30086 Phosphatidylethanolamine-binding protein 1 18 351.4
PERT_HUMAN P07202 Thyroid peroxidase precursor 9268.4
PIGU_HUMAN Q9H490 GPI transamidase component PIG-U 6885.6
PLSL_HUMAN P13796 Plastin-2 4736.4
PPA5_HUMAN P13686 Tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase type 5 precursor 7165.2
PPAL_HUMAN P11117 Lysosomal acid phosphatase precursor 22 810.8
PPIC_HUMAN P45877 Peptidyl-prolyl cistrans isomerase C 7521.7
PRDX5_HUMAN P30044 Peroxiredoxin-5, mitochondrial precursor 27 545
PSA7_HUMAN O14818 Proteasome subunit-α-type-7 7698.1
PTN1_HUMAN P18031 Tyrosine-protein phosphatase nonreceptor type 1 9163.5
RAB14_HUMAN P61106 Ras-related protein Rab-14 51 245.1
RAB5A_HUMAN P20339 Ras-related protein Rab-5A 47 974.5
RAB6A_HUMAN P20340 Ras-related protein Rab-6A 19 901
RAB8B_HUMAN Q92930 Ras-related protein Rab-8B 16 517.6
RAC1_HUMAN P63000 Ras-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1 precursor 21 333
RAC2_HUMAN P15153 Ras-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 2 precursor 25 760.3
RAD51_HUMAN Q06609 DNA repair protein RAD51 homolog 1 26 360
RDH11_HUMAN Q8TC12 Retinol dehydrogenase 11 9905.1
RER1_HUMAN O15258 Protein RER1 51 282.1
RHG01_HUMAN Q07960 Rho GTPase-activating protein 1 5484.1
RHG05_HUMAN Q13017 Rho GTPase-activating protein 5 29 811.6
RL26L_HUMAN Q9UNX3 60S ribosomal protein L26-like 1 13 508.4
RL35A_HUMAN P18077 60S ribosomal protein L35a 14 556.4
RM03_HUMAN P09001 Mitochondrial 39S ribosomal protein L3 7947.6
RM19_HUMAN P49406 39S ribosomal protein L19, 18 941.2
RM23_HUMAN Q16540 Mitochondrial 39S ribosomal protein L23 7021.3
RM45_HUMAN Q9BRJ2 39S ribosomal protein L45 4865.1
RM47_HUMAN Q9HD33 39S ribosomal protein L47 8733.4
RM49_HUMAN Q13405 Mitochondrial 39S ribosomal protein L49 9348.2
ROAA_HUMAN Q99729 Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein A/B 11 786.2
RS29_HUMAN P23368 40S ribosomal protein S29 28 316.9
RS30_HUMAN P62861 40S ribosomal protein S30 28 780
RT05_HUMAN P82675 Mitochondrial 28S ribosomal protein S5 22 731.3
RT21_HUMAN P82921 Mitochondrial 28S ribosomal protein S21 5830.9
RT22_HUMAN P82650 Mitochondrial 28S ribosomal protein S22 19 168
RT23_HUMAN Q9Y3D9 Mitochondrial ribosomal protein S23 11 273.1
RT27_HUMAN Q92552 Mitochondrial 28S ribosomal protein S27 9109.5
RT29_HUMAN P51398 Mitochondrial 28S ribosomal protein S29 16 080.6
RT31_HUMAN Q92665 28S ribosomal protein S31 9180.6
SAHH_HUMAN P23526 Adenosylhomocysteinase 6693.1
SAM50_HUMAN Q9Y512 Sorting and assembly machinery component 50 homolog 20 417.2
SC61B_HUMAN P60468 Protein transport protein Sec61 subunit-β 4296.1
SCOT2_HUMAN Q9BYC2 Succinyl-CoA:3-ketoacid-coenzyme A transferase 2 5226
SEC63_HUMAN Q9UGP8 Translocation protein SEC63 homolog 13 869.8
SELT_HUMAN P62341 Selenoprotein T precursor 6084.9
SNP23_HUMAN O00161 Synaptosomal-associated protein 23 6975
SPB9_HUMAN P50453 Serpin B9 12 587.1
SPC18_HUMAN P67812 Signal peptidase complex catalytic subunit SEC11A 57 989.1
SPCS2_HUMAN Q15005 Signal peptidase complex subunit 2 109 085.2
SPCS3_HUMAN P61009 Signal peptidase complex subunit 3 42 697.3
SPEE_HUMAN P19623 Spermidine synthase 6974.5
SPFH2_HUMAN O94905 Erlin-2 precursor 10 735.2
SRP14_HUMAN P37108 Signal recognition particle 14 kDa protein 13 486.8
SRPRB_HUMAN Q9Y5M8 Signal recognition particle receptor subunit-β 40 101.7
STAB1_HUMAN Q9NY15 Stabilin-1 precursor 9749.5
STIP1_HUMAN P31948 Stress-induced-phosphoprotein 1 12 685.4
STT3_HUMAN P46977 Dolichyl-diphosphooligosaccharide–protein glycosyltransferase subunit STT3A 92 851.8
STXB3_HUMAN O00186 Syntaxin-binding protein 3 14 934.9
SUCA_HUMAN P53597 Succinyl-CoA ligase (GDP-forming) subunit-α 13 559.2
SUCB2_HUMAN Q96I99 Succinyl-CoA ligase (GDP-forming) β-chain 22 082.8
SUMF2_HUMAN Q8NBJ7 Sulfatase-modifying factor 2 precursor 25 979.5
SYFA_HUMAN Q9Y285 Phenylalanyl-tRNA synthetase α-chain 8374.5
SYHH_HUMAN P49590 Probable histidyl-tRNA synthetase 7355.6
SYJ2B_HUMAN P57105 Synaptojanin-2-binding protein 11 689.6
SYNC_HUMAN O43776 Asparaginyl-tRNA synthetase, cytoplasmic 9428.2
SYTC_HUMAN P26639 Threonyl-tRNA synthetase, cytoplasmic 13 743
SYYM_HUMAN Q9Y2Z4 Tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase 9239
TCTP_HUMAN P13693 Translationally controlled tumor protein 14 280.2
TFAM_HUMAN Q00059 Transcription factor A 13 117.6
TFR1_HUMAN P02786 Transferrin receptor protein 1 102 292.9
THIM_HUMAN P42765 3-Ketoacyl-CoA thiolase, mitochondrial 55 188
TIM44_HUMAN O43615 Import inner membrane translocase subunit TIM44 18 388.5
TINAL_HUMAN Q9GZM7 Tubulointerstitial nephritis antigen-like precursor 7084.2
TM9S2_HUMAN Q99805 Transmembrane 9 superfamily protein member 2 precursor 15 776
TOM70_HUMAN O94826 Mitochondrial precursor proteins import receptor 21 430.9
TOR1A_HUMAN O14656 Torsin-1A precursor 4789.9
TPM3_HUMAN P06753 Tropomyosin α-3 chain 19 764.1
TRA2A_HUMAN Q13595 Transformer-2 protein homolog 9704.9
TRS85_HUMAN Q9Y2L5 Protein TRS85 homolog 4569.6
TSN14_HUMAN Q8NG11 Tetraspanin-14 21 012.1
TXD10_HUMAN Q96JJ7 Protein disulfide-isomerase TXNDC10 precursor 59 406.2
TXD12_HUMAN O95881 Thioredoxin domain-containing protein 12 precursor 22 843.6
TXK_HUMAN P42681 Tyrosine-protein kinase TXK 6124.9
TXTP_HUMAN P53007 Tricarboxylate transport protein 35 465
UCHL1_HUMAN P09936 Ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase isozyme L1 24 672.3
UN84B_HUMAN Q9UH99 Sad1/unc-84-like protein 2 16 362.3
VAMP2_HUMAN P63027 Vesicle-associated membrane protein 2 2904.5
VATB1_HUMAN P15313 Vacuolar ATP synthase subunit B, kidney isoform 25 398.4
VKORL_HUMAN Q8N0U8 Vitamin K epoxide reductase complex subunit 1-like protein 1 5392.5
VPP1_HUMAN Q93050 Vacuolar proton translocating ATPase 116 kDa subunit a isoform 1 39 169.7
XRP2_HUMAN O75695 Protein XRP2 21 357.6
ZBTB5_HUMAN O15062 Zinc finger and BTB domain-containing protein 5 10 611.5
ZN157_HUMAN P51786 Zinc finger protein 157 19 137.7

Table 4.

Proteins identified unique to TNF-α EMPs

Reference Accession no. Protein name TIC
3HIDH_HUMAN P31937 3-Hydroxyisobutyrate dehydrogenase 132 06.7
ABCE1_HUMAN P61221 ATP-binding cassette subfamily E member 4498.5
AP2B1_HUMAN P63010 AP-2 complex subunit-β-1 7398.7
AP3M1_HUMAN Q9Y2T2 AP-3 complex subunit-μ-1 12 842.9
APEX1_HUMAN P27695 DNA-(apurinic or apyrimidinic site) lyase 7705.5
BRSK1_HUMAN Q8TDC3 BR serine/threonine-protein kinase 1 23 559.7
BTF3_HUMAN P20290 Transcription factor BTF3 4593.6
BZRP_HUMAN P30536 Translocator protein 23 303.5
CD276_HUMAN Q5ZPR3 CD276 antigen precursor 16 043.7
CDS2_HUMAN O95674 Phosphatidate cytidylyltransferase 2 4957.3
COA1_HUMAN Q13085 Acetyl-CoA carboxylase 1 22 689.5
CRTAP_HUMAN O75718 Cartilage-associated protein precursor 8178.9
CTNL1_HUMAN Q9UBT7 α-Catulin 36 690.7
CXCC1_HUMAN Q9P0U4 CpG-binding protein 20 920
DESP_HUMAN P15924 Desmoplakin 22 369.4
DNJC7_HUMAN Q99615 DnaJ homolog subfamily C member 7 21 279.4
DRIM_HUMAN O75691 Small subunit processome component 20 homolog 21 872.6
DYNA_HUMAN Q14203 Dynactin subunit 1 16 194.7
FKBP7_HUMAN Q9Y680 FK506-binding protein 7 precursor 23 947.3
GNPI_HUMAN P46926 Glucosamine-6-phosphate isomerase 18 263.3
HNRPG_HUMAN P38159 Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein G 6693
HSP71_HUMAN P08107 Heat-shock 70 kDa protein 1 47 387.8
I23O_HUMAN P14902 Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 15 442.5
ICAM1_HUMAN P05362 Intercellular adhesion molecule 1 precursor 26 540.7
IMA2_HUMAN P52292 Importin subunit-α-2 27 202.6
IMB3_HUMAN O00410 Importin-β-3 15 359
ITPR3_HUMAN Q14573 Inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor type 3 15 484.8
K2C4_HUMAN P19013 Keratin, type II cytoskeletal 4 48 652
KAP3_HUMAN P31323 cAMP-dependent protein kinase type II-β regulatory subunit 16 233.4
KIF4A_HUMAN O95239 Chromosome-associated kinesin KIF4A 26 392
LAMA4_HUMAN Q16363 Laminin subunit-α-4 precursor 23 825.6
LAMB1_HUMAN P07942 Laminin subunit-β-1 precursor 21 492.5
LIPA3_HUMAN O75145 Liprin-α-3 2729.6
LRFN2_HUMAN Q9ULH4 Leucine-rich repeat and fibronectin type III domain-containing protein 2 precursor 62 612.5
MACF1_HUMAN Q9UPN3 Microtubule-actin cross-linking factor 1, isoforms 1/2/3/5 26 409.1
MCM6_HUMAN Q14566 DNA replication licensing factor MCM6 14 861.6
MIS_HUMAN P03971 Muellerian-inhibiting factor precursor 11 582.3
NEP_HUMAN P08473 Neprilysin 8834.7
NEUA_HUMAN Q8NFW8 N-acylneuraminate cytidylyltransferase 26 264.8
NMT1_HUMAN P30419 Glycylpeptide N-tetradecanoyltransferase 1 9662
NQO1_HUMAN P15559 NAD(P)H dehydrogenase (quinone) 1 15 878.3
NTHL1_HUMAN P78549 Endonuclease III-like protein 1 6149.2
NU4M_HUMAN P03905 NADH-ubiquinone oxidoreductase chain 4 5422
ORN_HUMAN Q9Y3B8 Oligoribonuclease, mitochondrial precursor 11 393.8
PAPPA_HUMAN Q13219 Pappalysin-1 precursor 6338.7
PLXD1_HUMAN Q9Y4D7 Plexin-D1 precursor 19 437.3
PSB2_HUMAN P49721 Proteasome subunit-β-type 2 53 641.3
PSB6_HUMAN P28072 Proteasome subunit-β-type 6 precursor 5379.3
PSB7_HUMAN Q99436 Proteasome subunitβ-type 7 precursor 7635.4
PSDE_HUMAN O00487 26S proteasome nonATPase regulatory subunit 14 14 168.5
PUR2_HUMAN P22102 Trifunctional purine biosynthetic protein adenosine-3 5535
RBL2_HUMAN Q08999 Retinoblastoma-like protein 2 4621.4
RINI_HUMAN P13489 Ribonuclease inhibitor 15 180.7
RL13A_HUMAN P40429 60S ribosomal protein L13a 8885.7
RL35_HUMAN P42766 60S ribosomal protein L35 10 179.2
S10AG_HUMAN Q96FQ6 Protein S100-A16 7285.6
SC10A_HUMAN Q9Y5Y9 Sodium channel protein type 10 subunit-α 44 255.4
SC24C_HUMAN P53992 Protein transport protein Sec24C 8599.8
SF3A3_HUMAN Q12874 Splicing factor 3A subunit 3 8704.3
SNUT1_HUMAN O43290 U4/U6.U5 tri-snRNP-associated protein 1 76 618.9
SPRE_HUMAN P35270 Sepiapterin reductase 11 487.8
STX16_HUMAN O14662 Syntaxin-16 12 549.9
SYI_HUMAN P41252 Isoleucyl-tRNA synthetase, cytoplasmic 39 914.8
SYS_HUMAN P49591 Seryl-tRNA synthetase, cytoplasmic 29 871
SYW_HUMAN P23381 Tryptophanyl-tRNA synthetase, cytoplasmic 5227
TENX_HUMAN P22105 Tenascin-X precursor 9015.2
TF3A_HUMAN Q92664 Transcription factor IIIA 14 060.6
THIO_HUMAN P10599 Thioredoxin 24 809.3
TIM50_HUMAN Q3ZCQ8 Import inner membrane translocase subunit TIM50, mitochondrial precursor 18 674.5
ZN225_HUMAN Q9UK10 Zinc finger protein 225 17 042.8

Altogether, these data clearly show that the protein composition of EMPs is altered when generated by different stimuli. This suggests that when the endothelial cell is stimulated with an agonist, such as PAI-1 or TNF-α, the spectrum of proteins that are packaged into the EMP is modified to rid the endothelial cell of specific proteins and that these may mediate downstream signals. Figure 1 clearly demonstrates that PAI-1 and TNF-α generate EMP populations contain overlapping but distinct protein compositions.

3.2 Common proteins of EMP populations

Nearly one-half, or 432 of the proteins we identified (see Fig. 1), are common to all EMPs regardless of stimulus. Because there are a large number of shared proteins in the EMP proteome, we examined the relative concentrations of many common proteins. We specifically compared the shared proteome of PAI-1 and TNF-α generated EMPs. As seen in Fig. 2A, 82 of the proteins common to PAI-1-and TNF-α generated EMPs were plotted against one another based on TIC. We found that there are significant differences in the protein abundance among the shared proteins of TNF-α and PAI-1 generated EMPs. Proteins that showed the greatest difference in relative abundance between PAI-1 and TNF-α generated EMPs are labeled in Fig. 2A. To further illustrate the difference in relative abundance based on TIC, the most abundant 11 proteins are graphed in Fig. 2B.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Figure 2

Relative abundance of proteins common to PAI-1- and TNF-α generated EMPs. (A) The relative abundance of proteins common to PAI-1- and TNF-α generated EMPs was plotted based upon TIC using Microsoft Excel. Twenty proteins with the largest difference in abundance were identified between PAI-1 and TNF-α generated EMPs using Petroplot. (B) The relative abundance, as represented by TIC, of the top 11 differentially expressed proteins was used to generate a bar graph in Microsoft Excel. The proteins included in the graph are keratin, type II cytoskeletal 5 (K2C5), septin-2 (SEPT2), glutathione peroxidase 1 (GPX1), keratin, type II cytoskeletal 6A (K2C6A), acyl-CoA dehydrogenase family member 9 (ACAD9), rab GDP dissociation inhibitor β (GDIB), ER lumen protein retaining receptor 2 (ERD22), fructose-bisphosphate aldolase A (ALDOA), chloride intracellular channel protein 1 (CLIC1), T-cell surface glycoprotein E2 precursor (MIC2), UROM.

Uromodulin precursor protein (UROM), while expressed by both PAI-1 and TNF-α generated EMPs, is 157 times more abundant in TNF-α generated EMPs than in PAI-1 generated EMPs. Uromodulin, also known as Tamm-Horsfall urinary glycoprotein (THP), has been implicated as playing a protective role in the urothelium [35]. Another report has identified THP as a specific antigen recognized by a novel mAb which positively immunostained the pharynx, trachea, and mesothelial lining of the lung in human tissue [36]. This relationship suggests the possibility that uromodulin may also play a protective role in the respiratory system as it does in the urothelium. If this is the case, then EMPs carrying uromodulin in the bloodstream may act as downstream signals or effectors of function not only of endothelial cells but also potentially of other cells in the respiratory system.

Another protein commonly expressed by both PAI-1 and TNF-α EMPs is keratin, type II cytoskeletal 5 protein. It is more abundantly expressed in PAI-1 generated EMPs, at a ratio of 9.1 times that of the same protein expressed by TNF-α generated EMPs. Of note, no cytokeratin proteins were identified in control EMPs. The cytokeratin family, specifically cytokeratin 19 (CK19), has been linked to ALI [37]. CK19 is expressed in type I and type II alveolar epithelial cells and CK19 fragments are released during cell injury or cell death. Increased CK19 fragment concentrations have been noted in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid of patients with ALI and associated with a poor prognosis [37]. Here too the data suggest a protein by which EMPs may be altering downstream cell signaling.

Another protein of note is glutathione peroxidase. This protein is differentially expressed in all three EMP populations studied and has also been linked to ALI. Glutathione peroxidase appears to play a role in the endogenous anti-oxidant system of the lung. It has been postulated that in order to recover from ALI, a patient must regain oxidative balance and regenerate reduced glutathione [38-41]. Our results suggest a possible mechanism by which EMPs and their protein components may contribute to the imbalance of the antioxidant system by shuttling glutathione peroxidase outside the endothelial cell and thus overwhelming the redox potential in the extracellular fluid.

Taken together, these data indicate that in addition to the obvious differences in protein composition between the EMP populations (Fig. 1), there are more subtle differences even among the shared proteins of the different EMP populations with respect to relative abundance (Fig. 2).

3.3 Gene ontology (GO) and KEGG pathway analysis of proteins identified from EMP populations

Using the Uniprot IDs and Apropos software, we searched the GOA Human gene association file downloaded from the Gene Ontology Consortium to determine the known annotations of cellular component, molecular function, biological process, and KEGG pathway for the proteins identified from control, PAI-1, and TNF-α generated EMPs. Statistical analysis was used to determine which GO terms or KEGG pathways were significantly enriched in the EMP population as compared to the human genome. A number of GO categories and KEGG pathways were identified that are significantly (Bonferroni corrected p-value ≤0.01) enriched in the different EMP populations. These enriched categories and pathways along with the number of proteins identified in each category or pathway are shown in Fig. 3 for cellular component (Fig. 3A), molecular function (Fig. 3B), biological process (Fig. 3C), and KEGG pathway (Fig. 3D). While proteins were found that are significantly over-represented in the EMP populations, we observed that the enriched GO categories or KEGG pathways are not strikingly different between the different EMP populations. For example, many of the proteins identified in the control, TNF-α, and PAI-1 EMP populations derive from the cytoplasm, ER, mitochondrion, and ribosomes (Fig. 3A). In addition, several of the proteins in all three EMP populations are associated with nucleotide binding, protein binding, protein folding, protein transport, and translation processes (Figs. 3B and 3C), as well as oxidative phosphorylation, glycolysis, and ribosome pathways (Fig. 3D). However, we also observed more subtle, but distinct differences in categories and pathways enriched between the EMP populations. In the control EMPs, proteins from the cellular membrane components showed significant enrichment in the population (p = 2.68E − 11). However, while proteins were identified in PAI-1 and TNF-α EMPs that derive from the cell membrane, these proteins were not significantly over-represented in the population, compared to the control EMPs (data not shown). In contrast, PAI-1 and TNF-α EMPs, but not control EMPs, show significant enrichment in proteins from the proteasome complex and proteasome core complex (Fig. 3A).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Figure 3

GO annotation and KEGG pathway analysis for EMP proteins. The Uniprot IDs of the total proteins identified in control, TNF-α, and PAI-1 generated EMPs via the MS/MS analysis were used to annotate the proteins with their corresponding GO annotations using Apropos software. Annotations with regard to cellular component (A), molecular function (B), biological process (C), and KEGG pathway (D) were obtained from the GOA Human gene association file downloaded from the Gene Ontology Consortium. The enrichment of the specific GO and KEGG pathway annotations were calculated using the hypergeometric distribution with the whole human genome used as the reference annotation set. A Bonferroni multiple testing correction was applied to the resulting p-values and values less than or equal to 0.01 were considered significant. For the GO categories or KEGG pathways that were significantly enriched, the number of proteins identified that belong to each category are shown.

With regard to molecular function, NADH dehydrogenase activity was significantly over-represented in control EMPs (p = 3.15E − 07) but not in PAI-1 EMPs (p = 2.6) or TNF-α EMPs (p = 190.3), whereas threonine endopeptidase activity showed significant enrichment in PAI-1 EMPs (p = 0.01) and TNF-α EMPs (p = 8.8E − 08), but not in control EMPs (p = 17) (Fig. 3B). The biological process GO annotations also reveal distinct differences with respect to control EMPs as compared to PAI-1 EMPs and TNF-α EMPs. Control EMPs have an increased number of proteins involved in electron transport (p = 0.005) as compared with PAI-1 EMPs and TNF-α EMPs (Fig. 3C). Similarly, small GTPase-mediated signal transduction was enriched in control EMPs (p = 0.003) but not in the other EMP populations studied (Fig. 3C).

Finally, KEGG pathway analysis revealed many potential similarities and differences between the three populations of EMPs studied. Specifically, two disease pathways, Escherichia coli infection and cholera, were different between the EMP populations. With E. coli significant in more proteins were identified in both PAI-1 EMPs (p = 0.001) and TNF-α EMPs (p = 0.0096) (Fig. 3D). In the pathway analysis for cholera, only PAI-1 EMP proteins were significantly over-represented (Fig. 3D). Analysis using the commercially available software system, Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (version 5.5; Ingenuity Systems) gave similar results (data not shown).

Altogether, GO annotation and KEGG pathway analysis data revealed that there may be functional differences between the EMP populations. However, for the majority of proteins identified in control EMPs, PAI-1 EMPs, and TNF-α EMPs there is no apparent significant enrichment or over-representation of proteins with regard to cellular components, molecular function, biological processes, or KEGG pathway. It may be extrapolated that additional functional differences are due to variations in protein abundance among the proteins common to all three populations (Fig. 2).

4 Concluding remarks

In summary, we have provided evidence that the EMP proteome contains overlapping yet distinct proteins when different stimuli are used to generate EMPs. Furthermore, among the proteins common to all EMP populations there are significant differences in the relative abundance. Finally, GO and KEGG pathway analysis reveals that EMPs generated under different conditions may contain proteins derived from similar yet distinct cellular compartments, and perform molecular functions and biological processes that participate in many of the same KEGG pathways. From these observations, one can speculate that EMPs may then have several overlapping functions, regardless of the EMP generating stimulus. While the proteome of various EMPs are similar and overlap, each population is clearly distinct with variations in protein abundance and composition. These unique aspects may confer functional differences. Clearly, more mechanistic studies are indicated to pursue the functional aspects of EMPs generated by different stimuli. This is currently the focus of ongoing studies in our laboratory. Our current findings that EMPs stimulated by different agonists generate distinct populations of EMPs with unique protein compositions provide fundamental insight into the mechanisms regulating the production of these particles and their physiological role in different diseases.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental material

Table 3.

Proteins identified unique to PAI-1 EMPs

Reference Accession no. Protein name TIC
A2MG_HUMAN P01023 α-2-Macroglobulin precursor 47 140
ACOX2_HUMAN Q99424 Acyl-coenzyme A oxidase 2 30 595.3
AKA11_HUMAN Q9UKA4 A-kinase anchor protein 11 25 373.4
AL2S3_HUMAN O60296 Trafficking kinesin-binding protein 2 17 423.5
AL4A1_HUMAN P30038 δ-1-pyrroline-5-carboxylate dehydrogenase 11 675.2
ALP_HUMAN Q9H0A0 N-acetyltransferase 10 14 821.5
ANM1_HUMAN Q99873 Protein arginine N-methyltransferase 1 11 491.5
APC_HUMAN P25054 Adenomatous polyposis coli protein 30 515.7
APOA1_HUMAN P02647 Apolipoprotein A-I precursor 7573.1
ARPC2_HUMAN O15144 Actin-related protein 2/3 complex subunit 2 4460.5
ASXL1_HUMAN Q8IXJ9 Putative polycomb group protein ASXL1 16 073.1
AT5G1_HUMAN P05496 ATP synthase lipid-binding protein 79 498.2
ATD3B_HUMAN Q5T9A4 ATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 3B 9533.6
B2MG_HUMAN P61769 β-2-Microglobulin precursor 4474
BINCA_HUMAN Q96LW7 Bcl10-interacting CARD protein 25 791.4
CAR14_HUMAN Q9BXL6 Caspase recruitment domain-containing protein 14 13 620
CD5L_HUMAN O43866 CD5 antigen-like precursor 13 869.5
CEP4_HUMAN Q66GS9 Centrosomal protein 4 8373.1
CN021_HUMAN Q86U38 Pumilio domain-containing protein C14orf21 5057.9
CPSF5_HUMAN O43809 Cleavage and polyadenylation specificity factor 5 22 770.2
CSK21_HUMAN P68400 Casein kinase II subunit-α 6560.2
CUL1_HUMAN Q13616 Cullin-1 18 137.6
DMBT1_HUMAN Q9UGM3 Deleted in malignant brain tumors 1 protein precursor 29 815
DYN2_HUMAN P50570 Dynamin-2 10 084.5
ECH1_HUMAN Q13011 δ(3,5)-δ(2,4)-dienoyl-CoA isomerase 32 274.5
EHD1_HUMAN Q9H4M9 EH domain-containing protein 1 31 397
EHD4_HUMAN Q9H223 EH domain-containing protein 4 17 203.3
EVI2B_HUMAN P34910 EVI2B protein precursor 6844.5
FETA_HUMAN P02771 α-Fetoprotein precursor 7866.1
FINC_HUMAN P02751 Fibronectin precursor 14 674.5
FLNC_HUMAN Q14315 Filamin-C 9765.5
FSTL1_HUMAN Q12841 Follistatin-related protein 1 precursor 121 026.8
FUSIP_HUMAN O75494 FUS-interacting serine-arginine-rich protein 1 28 150.1
G3PT_HUMAN O14556 Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase, testis-specific 8769.1
GGT5_HUMAN P36269 γ-Glutamyltransferase 5 precursor 47 995.4
GRB10_HUMAN Q13322 Growth factor receptor-bound protein 10 156 086.1
HBA_HUMAN P69905 Hemoglobin subunit-α 120 457.8
HNRPR_HUMAN O43390 Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein R 29 275.2
HXB4_HUMAN P17483 Homeobox protein Hox-B4 6668
IDHC_HUMAN O75874 Isocitrate dehydrogenase (NADP) cytoplasmic 4740.8
IF39_HUMAN P55884 Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 subunit 9 10 199.1
ITB5_HUMAN P18084 Integrin β-5 precursor 19 295.3
K0196_HUMAN Q12768 Strumpellin 22 066.1
K1C14_HUMAN P02533 Keratin, type I cytoskeletal 14 241 145.9
K1C16_HUMAN P08779 Keratin, type I cytoskeletal 16 191 445.2
K22O_HUMAN Q01546 Keratin, type II cytoskeletal 2 oral 28 104.7
KIFC1_HUMAN Q9BW19 Kinesin-like protein KIFC1 23 906.5
LACTB_HUMAN P83111 Serine β-lactamase-like protein LACTB, mitochondrial precursor 29 817.8
LNX2_HUMAN Q8N448 Ligand of Numb protein X 2 19 453.1
M3K3_HUMAN Q99759 Mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase 3 13 983.5
MAGB1_HUMAN P43366 Melanoma-associated antigen B1 4812.8
MLEY_HUMAN P14649 Myosin light polypeptide 6B 5508.2
MMRN2_HUMAN Q9H8L6 Multimerin-2 precursor 15 402.4
MYH14_HUMAN Q7Z406 Myosin-14 33 589.1
NB6M_HUMAN Q9P0J0 NADH dehydrogenase (ubiquinone) 1-α-subcomplex subunit 13 2925
NEDD8_HUMAN Q15843 NEDD8 precursor 6134.5
NEUL_HUMAN Q9BYT8 Neurolysin, mitochondrial precursor 62 238.3
NIPBL_HUMAN Q6KC79 Nipped-B-like protein 18 925.7
NP1L4_HUMAN Q99733 Nucleosome assembly protein 1-like 4 10 005.6
NPT2B_HUMAN O95436 Sodium-dependent phosphate transport protein 2B 16 003
NR1H4_HUMAN Q96RI1 Bile acid receptor 109 977.5
NSF_HUMAN P46459 Vesicle-fusing ATPase 15 351.3
NUPM_HUMAN P51970 NADH dehydrogenase (ubiquinone) 1-α-subcomplex subunit 8 7865.2
O13C3_HUMAN Q8NGS6 Olfactory receptor 13C3 38 066.4
OTUB1_HUMAN Q96FW1 Ubiquitin thioesterase OTUB1 5642.2
PAIRB_HUMAN Q8NC51 Plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 RNA-binding protein 9677.4
PARP1_HUMAN P09874 Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 15 303.6
PML_HUMAN P29590 Probable transcription factor PML 7979.4
PRP8_HUMAN Q6P2Q9 Pre-mRNA-processing-splicing factor 8 27 736.9
PRS6A_HUMAN P17980 26S protease regulatory subunit 6A 12 072.7
PRS6B_HUMAN P43686 26S protease regulatory subunit 6B 16 682.9
PRS8_HUMAN P62195 26S protease regulatory subunit 8 26 249.4
PSA3_HUMAN P25788 Proteasome subunit-α-type 3 6300.6
PSB5_HUMAN P28074 Proteasome subunit-β-type 5 precursor 18 972.3
PSD1_HUMAN Q99460 26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 39 869.6
PSME1_HUMAN Q06323 Proteasome activator complex subunit 1 12 661.9
PX11B_HUMAN O96011 Peroxisomal membrane protein 11B 12 671.3
RANG_HUMAN P43487 Ran-specific GTPase-activating protein 5664.9
RO60_HUMAN P10155 60 kDa SS-A/Ro ribonucleoprotein 5432.3
RT30_HUMAN Q9NP92 Mitochondrial 28S ribosomal protein S30 6654.8
SC23A_HUMAN Q15436 Protein transport protein Sec23A 20 929
SCN8A_HUMAN Q9UQD0 Sodium channel protein type 8 subunit-α 24 593.9
SF3B1_HUMAN O75533 Splicing factor 3B subunit 1 14 944.1
SF3B3_HUMAN Q15393 Splicing factor 3B subunit 3 21 675.6
SH3L3_HUMAN Q9H299 SH3 domain-binding glutamic acid-rich-like protein 3 8768.1
SODC_HUMAN P00441 Superoxide dismutase (Cu-Zn) 7680.4
SPRC_HUMAN P09486 SPARC precursor 30 380.7
STX5_HUMAN Q13190 Syntaxin-5 10 522.4
SYD_HUMAN P14868 Aspartyl-tRNA synthetase, cytoplasmic 7720
SYFB_HUMAN Q9NSD9 Phenylalanyl-tRNA synthetase β-chain 12 248.2
SYNE1_HUMAN Q8NF91 Nesprin-1 15 490
TALDO_HUMAN P37837 Transaldolase 36 482.2
TLL1_HUMAN O43897 Tolloid-like protein 1 precursor 24 774
TPR_HUMAN P12270 Nucleoprotein TPR 3998.5
TRA2B_HUMAN P62995 Splicing factor, arginine/serine-rich 10 38 082.7
TRY1_HUMAN P07477 Trypsin-1 precursor 14 681
UBP14_HUMAN P54578 Ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase 14 14 597.9
VATC_HUMAN P21283 Vacuolar ATP synthase subunit C 1 9337.2
VATL_HUMAN P27449 Vacuolar ATP synthase 16 kDa proteolipid subunit 107 533.9
VPS26_HUMAN O75436 Vacuolar protein sorting-associated protein 26A 23 112.4
VTNC_HUMAN P04004 Vitronectin precursor 36 645
WNT6_HUMAN Q9Y6F9 Protein Wnt-6 precursor 12 273.1
XYLT2_HUMAN Q9H1B5 Xylosyltransferase 2 35 817
ZN443_HUMAN Q9Y2A4 Zinc finger protein 443 9180.1

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by grants from the Children’s Hospital of Wisconsin Foundation and Children’s Research Institute (T. S. and J. S. O.) and National Institutes of Health (K. P.: HL61417, HL71412, HL081139).

Abbreviations

ALI

acute lung injury

CK19

cytokeratin 19

EMP

endothelial microparticle

GO

gene ontology

HBSS

Hank’s balanced salt solution

HUVEC

human umbilical vein endothelial cell

MP

microparticles

PAI-1

plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1

TNF-α

tumor necrosis factor-alpha

Footnotes

The authors have declared no conflict of interest.

References

  • 1.Combes V, Simon AC, Grau GE, Arnoux D, et al. In vitro generation of endothelial microparticles and possible prothrombotic activity in patients with lupus anticoagulant. J Clin Invest. 1999;104:93–102. doi: 10.1172/JCI4985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Simak J, Holada K, Vostal JG. Release of annexin V-binding membrane microparticles from cultured human umbilical vein endothelial cells after treatment with camptothecin. BMC Cell Biol. 2002;3:11. doi: 10.1186/1471-2121-3-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Berckmans RJ, Nieuwland R, Tak PP, Boing AN, et al. Cell-derived microparticles in synovial fluid from inflamed arthritic joints support coagulation exclusively via a factor VII-dependent mechanism. Arthritis Rheum. 2002;46:2857–2866. doi: 10.1002/art.10587. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Butikofer P, Kuypers FA, Xu CM, Chiu DT, Lubin B. Enrichment of two glycosyl-phosphatidylinositol-anchored proteins, acetylcholinesterase and decay accelerating factor, in vesicles released from human red blood cells. Blood. 1989;74:1481–1485. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Satta N, Toti F, Feugeas O, Bohbot A, et al. Monocyte vesiculation is a possible mechanism for dissemination of membrane-associated procoagulant activities and adhesion molecules after stimulation by lipopolysaccharide. J Immunol. 1994;153:3245–3255. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Blanchard N, Lankar D, Faure F, Regnault A, et al. TCR activation of human T cells induces the production of exosomes bearing the TCR/CD3/zeta complex. J Immunol. 2002;168:3235–3241. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.168.7.3235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Raposo G, Nijman HW, Stoorvogel W, Liejendekker R, et al. B lymphocytes secrete antigen-presenting vesicles. J Exp Med. 1996;183:1161–1172. doi: 10.1084/jem.183.3.1161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Garcia S, Chirinos J, Jimenez J, Del Carpio Munoz F. Phenotypic assessment of endothelial microparticles in patients with heart failure and after heart transplantation: Switch from cell activation to apoptosis. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2005;24:2184–2189. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2005.07.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.George JN, Thoi LL, McManus LM, Reimann TA. Isolation of human platelet membrane microparticles from plasma and serum. Blood. 1982;60:834–840. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Essayagh S, Brisset AC, Terrisse AD, Dupouy D et al. Microparticles from apoptotic vascular smooth muscle cells induce endothelial dysfunction, a phenomenon prevented by beta3-integrin antagonists. Thromb Haemost. 2005;94:853–858. doi: 10.1160/TH04-12-0786. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Stampfuss JJ, Censarek P, Fischer JW, Schror K, Weber AA. Rapid release of active tissue factor from human arterial smooth muscle cells under flow conditions. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2006;26:e34–e37. doi: 10.1161/01.ATV.0000216407.89528.b0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Jimenez JJ, Jy W, Mauro LM, Soderland C et al. Endothelial cells release phenotypically and quantitatively distinct microparticles in activation and apoptosis. Thromb Res. 2003;109:175–180. doi: 10.1016/s0049-3848(03)00064-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Wolf P. The nature and significance of platelet products in human plasma. Br J Haematol. 1967;13:269–288. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.1967.tb08741.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Banfi C, Brioschi M, Wait R, Begum S, et al. Proteome of endothelial cell-derived procoagulant microparticles. Proteomics. 2005;5:4443–4455. doi: 10.1002/pmic.200402017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Sander TL, Ou JS, Densmore JC, Kaul S, et al. Protein composition of plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1-derived endothelial microparticles. Shock. 2008;29:504–511. doi: 10.1097/shk.0b013e3181454898. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Brodsky SV, Malinowski K, Golightly M, Jesty J, Goligorsky MS. Plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 promotes formation of endothelial microparticles with procoagulant potential. Circulation. 2002;106:2372–2378. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000033972.90653.af. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kim HK, Song KS, Chung JH, Lee KR, Lee SN. Platelet microparticles induce angiogenesis in vitro. Br J Haematol. 2004;124:376–384. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.2003.04773.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Taraboletti G, D’Ascenzo S, Borsotti P, Giavazzi R, et al. Shedding of the matrix metalloproteinases MMP-2, MMP-9, and MT1-MMP as membrane vesicle-associated components by endothelial cells. Am J Pathol. 2002;160:673–680. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)64887-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Klinkner DB, Densmore JC, Kaul S, Noll L, et al. Endothelium-derived microparticles inhibit human cardiac valve endothelial cell function. Shock. 2006;25:575–580. doi: 10.1097/01.shk.0000209558.69575.80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Brodsky SV, Zhang F, Nasjletti A, Goligorsky MS. Endothelium-derived microparticles impair endothelial function in vitro. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2004;286:H1910–H1915. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.01172.2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Densmore JC, Signorino PR, Ou J, Hatoum OA, et al. Endothelium-derived microparticles induce endothelial dysfunction and acute lung injury. Shock. 2006;26:464–471. doi: 10.1097/01.shk.0000228791.10550.36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Sabatier F, Darmon P, Hugel B, Combes V, et al. Type 1 and type 2 diabetic patients display different patterns of cellular microparticles. Diabetes. 2002;51:2840–2845. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.51.9.2840. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Amabile N, Guerin AP, Leroyer A, Mallat Z, et al. Circulating endothelial microparticles are associated with vascular dysfunction in patients with end-stage renal failure. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2005;16:3381–3388. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2005050535. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Heloire F, Weill B, Weber S, Batteux F. Aggregates of endothelial microparticles and platelets circulate in peripheral blood. Thromb Res. 2003;110:173–180. doi: 10.1016/s0049-3848(03)00297-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Goon PK, Lip GY, Boos CJ, Stonelake PS, Blann AD. Circulating endothelial cells, endothelial progenitor cells, and endothelial microparticles in cancer. Neoplasia. 2006;8:79–88. doi: 10.1593/neo.05592. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Brogan PA, Shah V, Brachet C, Harnden A, et al. Endothelial and platelet microparticles in vasculitis of the young. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;50:927–936. doi: 10.1002/art.20199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Shet AS, Aras O, Gupta K, Hass MJ, et al. Sickle blood contains tissue factor-positive microparticles derived from endothelial cells and monocytes. Blood. 2003;102:2678–2683. doi: 10.1182/blood-2003-03-0693. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Dignat-George F, Camoin-Jau L, Sabatier F, Arnoux D, et al. Endothelial microparticles: A potential contribution to the thrombotic complications of the antiphospholipid syndrome. Thromb Haemost. 2004;91:667–673. doi: 10.1160/TH03-07-0487. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Halligan BD, Slyper RY, Twigger SN, Hicks W, et al. ZoomQuant: An application for the quantitation of stable isotope labeled peptides. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2005;16:302–306. doi: 10.1016/j.jasms.2004.11.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Elias JE, Haas W, Faherty BK, Gygi SP. Comparative evaluation of mass spectrometry platforms used in large-scale proteomics investigations. Nat Methods. 2005;2:667–675. doi: 10.1038/nmeth785. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Su AI, Cooke MP, Ching KA, Hakak Y, et al. Large-scale analysis of the human and mouse transcriptomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002;99:4465–4470. doi: 10.1073/pnas.012025199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Ghio AJ, Carter JD, Richards JH, Richer LD, et al. Iron and iron-related proteins in the lower respiratory tract of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care Med. 2003;31:395–400. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000050284.35609.97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Bromberg Z, Deutschman CS, Weiss YG. Heat shock protein 70 and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. J Anesth. 2005;19:236–242. doi: 10.1007/s00540-005-0308-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Weiss YG, Maloyan A, Tazelaar J, Raj N, Deutschman CS. Adenoviral transfer of HSP-70 into pulmonary epithelium ameliorates experimental acute respiratory distress syndrome. J Clin Invest. 2002;110:801–806. doi: 10.1172/JCI15888. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Parsons CL. The role of the urinary epithelium in the pathogenesis of interstitial cystitis/prostatitis/urethritis. Urology. 2007;69:9–16. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.03.084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Howell DN, Burchette JL, Jr, Paolini JF, Geier SS, et al. Characterization of a novel human corneal endothelial antigen. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1991;32:2473–2482. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Stern JB, Paugam C, Validire P, Adle-Biassette H, et al. Cytokeratin 19 fragments in patients with acute lung injury: A preliminary observation. Intensive Care Med. 2006;32:910–914. doi: 10.1007/s00134-006-0124-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Hochscheid R, Schuchmann U, Kotte E, Kranz S, et al. NO2-induced acute and chronic lung injury cause imbalance of glutathione metabolism in type II pneumocytes. Med Sci Monit. 2005;11:BR273–BR279. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Kozar RA, Weibel CJ, Cipolla J, Klein AJ, et al. Anti-oxidant enzymes are induced during recovery from acute lung injury. Crit Care Med. 2000;28:2486–2491. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200007000-00050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Metnitz PG, Bartens C, Fischer M, Fridrich P, et al. Anti-oxidant status in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Intensive Care Med. 1999;25:180–185. doi: 10.1007/s001340050813. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Sciuto AM, Cascio MB, Moran TS, Forster JS. The fate of antioxidant enzymes in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid over 7 days in mice with acute lung injury. Inhal Toxicol. 2003;15:675–685. doi: 10.1080/08958370390197245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental material

RESOURCES