Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Medicine logoLink to Medicine
. 2016 Feb 12;95(6):e2382. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000002382

Leptin Is Associated With Persistence of Hyperglycemia in Acute Pancreatitis

A Prospective Clinical Study

James IC Kennedy 1, Kathryn J Askelund 1, Rakesh Premkumar 1, Anthony RJ Phillips 1, Rinki Murphy 1, John A Windsor 1, Maxim S Petrov 1
Editor: Farid Azmoudeh-Ardalan1
PMCID: PMC4753864  PMID: 26871770

Abstract

Adipokines have many homeostatic roles, including modulation of glucose metabolism, but their role in the pathophysiology of hyperglycemia associated with acute and critical illnesses in general, and acute pancreatitis (AP) in particular, is largely unknown. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between a panel of adipokines and hyperglycemia in the early course of AP, as well as the role of adipokines as predictors of AP severity.

Adiponectin, leptin, omentin, resistin, and visfatin were measured on a daily basis in the first 72 hours after hospital admission. A first set of analyses was undertaken with admission glycemia stratified by severity, and a second set of analyses was undertaken based on persistence of early hyperglycemia. All of the analyses were adjusted for confounders.

A total of 32 patients with AP were included in this study. None of the studied adipokines was significantly associated with glucose level on admission. Leptin was significantly (P = 0.003) increased in patients with persistent hyperglycemia. Adiponectin was significantly associated with the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score in patients with persistent hyperglycemia (P = 0.015), visfatin with APACHE II score in patients with persistent hyperglycemia (P = 0.014), and omentin with APACHE II score in all of the patients regardless of the presence or absence of hyperglycemia (P = 0.021).

Leptin is significantly associated with persistent hyperglycemia in the early course of AP. Omentin has a potential to become an accurate predictor of AP severity.

INTRODUCTION

Emerging evidence suggests that in-hospital hyperglycemia in acute and critical illness may be a useful marker for identifying those patients at higher risk of future development of diabetes mellitus.1–4 In critically ill patients, in-hospital hyperglycemia is associated with up to a 5-fold increased risk of new onset diabetes after hospital discharge with emergence of diabetes in up to half of these patients within the first year after hospital discharge.4 Acute pancreatitis (AP), an acute inflammatory disease of the pancreas and classic example of acute and critical illnesses, is a known cause of diabetes.5 In addition, recent research has shown that the pathogenesis of diabetes after AP may be more complex than being simply due to mechanical destruction of the islets of Langerhans by pancreatic necrosis.5–7

Adipokines, a family of adipose-derived hormones, are biologically active mediators that have several important roles, including modulation of glucose metabolism.8–11 Adipokines have been shown to be involved in various metabolic processes such as insulin sensitivity, insulin secretion, appetite control, fat distribution, energy expenditure, inflammation, regulation of adipogenesis, and chemoattraction of immune cells into adipose tissue.8–11 In addition, they have a potential role in the pathophysiology of hyperglycemia associated with AP. While adipokines have been previously studied in the setting of AP, this has invariably been in the context of disease severity prediction.10,12–15 To date, there have been no studies examining the relationship between adipokines and hyperglycemia early in the course of AP.

First, the aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between several adipokines (adiponectin, leptin, omentin, resistin, and visfatin) and early hyperglycemia associated with AP, drawing conclusions about its time course and the effect of specific confounders such as sex, personal history of diabetes, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score, body mass index (BMI), age, and duration of symptoms to hospital admission. Second, this study aimed to consider adipokines as predictors of severity of AP through APACHE II score in patients with and without persistent hyperglycemia.

METHODS

Patient Recruitment

Consecutive adult patients (aged ≥18) with a confirmed diagnosis of AP admitted to Auckland City Hospital over a 12-month study period were considered for inclusion. Diagnosis of AP was determined by ≥2 of the following: total amylase and/or pancreatic amylase (3× the upper limit of normal), pain typical of AP, and characteristic findings of AP on computed tomography and/or ultrasound. Patients were excluded if they had any of the following: chronic pancreatitis, postendoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis, intraoperative diagnosis, pregnancy, or malignancy. Informed written consent was gained from all patients prior to their inclusion in the study, and the project was approved by the local ethics committee.

Data Collection

Baseline data were prospectively collected from all eligible patients, including age, sex, BMI, APACHE II score, personal history of diabetes mellitus, fasting glucose concentration (daily; during the first 72 hours after hospital admission), and time from first symptoms to hospital admission. None of the patients without diabetes on admission received insulin or oral antiglycemic agents during the study period. Venous blood was taken for adipokine assays at 24, 48, and 72 hours after admission. Patients were required to fast for ≥8 hours prior to their fasting blood glucose being measured.

Study Groups

Two separate analyses were undertaken based on the patients’ venous glucose level in order to examine the relationship between adipokines and glucose on admission, and the persistence of early hyperglycemia in the first 72 hours of admission.

Glucose on Admission Analysis

Admission glycaemia was stratified by severity as follows: euglycemia 4 to 6 mmol/L, mild hyperglycemia 6.1 to 7.7 mmol/L, moderate hyperglycemia 7.8 to 11.0 mmol/L, and severe hyperglycemia 11.1 to 20 mmol/L.4 Patients with an admission glucose level of <4.0 or >20 mmol/L were excluded on the basis that such values warranted urgent medical attention.

Persistent Hyperglycemia Analysis

Persistent hyperglycemia was defined as fasting blood glucose >6.1 mmol/L on ≥2 consecutive 24-hour periods during the first 72 hours after hospital admission.16

Adipokine Assays

Plasma adipokine concentrations were measured at 24, 48, and 72 hours after hospital admission. The “glucose on admission” analysis used the 24-hour time point concentration, whereas the “persistent hyperglycemia” analysis used the highest concentration measurement out of the 48- and 72-hour assessment times. If only the 48- or 72-hour assessment time was available then that value was used.

Adipokine levels were determined using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit, according to the supplier's instructions (Adiponectin, resistin; Millipore Inc, MA. Cat#HADK1-61K-A Leptin; Millipore Inc. Cat# EZHL-80SK, Omentin; Millipore Inc. Cat# EZH0MNTN1-29K, Visfatin; MBL Intl Corp, MA. Cat#JM-k4907-100). The results of the ELISA test for adiponectin and resistin were read by a Luminex 100 IS microplate reader (Luminex Corporation, Austin, TX), leptin and omentin were read by a plate reader (Perkin Elmer, Enspire, 2300 Multilabel Reader, MA) at 450 and 590 nm, and visfatin on the same reader at 450 nm. Readings were interpreted using interpolation of a 5-parameter logistic equation for adiponectin and resistin, a sigmoidal 5-parameter logistic equation for leptin and omentin (R2>0.99 for each assay) and a regression curve formula in the form of a parameter-4 equation for visfatin. Assay sensitivity was 145.4 pg/mL, 0.135 ng/mL, 0.23 ng/mL, 6.7 pg/mL, 30 pg/mL with the range of measured concentrations being 12.3 to 93.6 μg/mL, 0.27 to 29.5 ng/mL, 10.7 to 156.3 ng/mL, 1.5 to 60.4 ng/mL, 0.2 to 6.8 ng/mL for adiponectin, leptin, omentin, resistin, and visfatin, respectively.

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using Microsoft Excel (Windows) and SPSS 21 for Windows (IBM Corp). All data was presented as mean ± standard deviation. ANOVA (analysis of variance) and ANCOVA (analysis of covariance) tests were used to determine differences between the groups. ANCOVA analysis was used to reduce within group variance and also to adjust for confounders. The 2 key assumptions of ANCOVA—independence of the covariate and groups, and homogeneity of regression slopes—were confirmed for all but the resistin “glucose on admission”, resistin “persistant hyperglycemia,” and leptin “glucose on admission” analyses.17 The additional variables—sex, history of diabetes, APACHE II score, BMI, age, and duration of symptoms, were all entered in the model. In addition, the interaction between these factors and study groups was investigated. For all tests P values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Patient Characteristics

A total of 32 patients (mean age 53.6 ± 19.6 years), 17 men and 15 women, with AP were included in this study. For the glucose on admission analysis, patients were distributed through the following groups: euglycemia (n = 8), mild (n = 12), moderate (n = 8), and severe hyperglycemia (n = 3). Patient characteristics are shown in Table 1. There were no significant differences between the groups for age, BMI, sex, APACHE II score, time from onset of symptoms, and etiology.

TABLE 1.

Baseline Characteristics

graphic file with name medi-95-e2382-g001.jpg

Open in a new tab

For the persistent hyperglycemia analysis, 15 patients had persistent hyperglycemia, whereas 17 patients did not. Patient characteristics are shown in Table 1. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups for age, BMI, APACHE II score, time from onset of symptoms, and etiology; however, men had persistent hyperglycemia more frequently than women (P = 0.036).

Association Between Adipokines and Glucose on Admission

Adipokine concentrations were available for patients on admission as follows: adiponectin (n = 13), leptin (n = 24), omentin (n = 25), resistin (n = 18), and visfatin (n = 27).

Adiponectin

The mean total adiponectin concentration in these patients was 39.6 ± 22.7 μg/mL. The number of patients in each group and their mean adiponectin concentrations were euglycemia (n = 3, 43.2 ± 39.2), mild (n = 6, 43.3 ± 17.9), moderate (n = 3, 37.7 ± 21.9), and severe hyperglycemia (n = 1, 17.9). This resulted in an unadjusted P-value of 0.824. Due to the limited sample size, it was not possible to calculate an adjusted P value.

Leptin

The mean leptin concentration in these patients was 6.4 ± 7.7 ng/mL. The number of patients in each group and their mean leptin concentrations were euglycemia (n = 8, 3.1 ± 2.1), mild (n = 8, 11.8 ± 11.2), moderate (n = 6, 4.0 ± 4.1), and severe hyperglycemia (n = 2, 5.6 ± 3.7). This resulted in an unadjusted P value of 0.103, and with the inclusion of the aforementioned confounders resulted in an adjusted P value of 0.273. None of the confounders, both alone and as an interaction with glucose level, was associated with leptin (Table 2).

TABLE 2.

Relationship Between the Studied Adipokines and Potential Confounders in Patients With Hyperglycemia on Admission and Persistent Hyperglycemia

graphic file with name medi-95-e2382-g002.jpg

Open in a new tab

Omentin

The mean omentin concentration in these patients was 74.8 ± 35.1 ng/mL. The number of patients in each group and their mean omentin concentrations were euglycemia (n = 7, 66.7 ± 19.7), mild (n = 10, 77.1 ± 39.0), moderate (n = 6, 67.0 ± 34.8), and severe hyperglycemia (n = 2, 114.4 ± 28.0). This resulted in an unadjusted P value of 0.372, and with the inclusion of the aforementioned confounders resulted in an adjusted P value of 0.564. None of the confounders, both alone and as an interaction with glucose level, was associated with omentin (Table 2).

Resistin

The mean resistin concentration in these patients was 13.1 ± 12.5 ng/mL. The number of patients in each group and their mean resistin concentrations were euglycemia (n = 8, 15.1 ± 18.8), mild (n = 2, 13.3 ± 10.8), moderate (n = 6, 9.5 ± 6.6), and severe hyperglycemia (n = 2, 14.6 ± 9.0). This resulted in an unadjusted P value of 0.880, and with the inclusion of the aforementioned confounders resulted in an adjusted P value of 0.451. None of the confounders, both alone and as an interaction with glucose level, was associated with resistin (Table 2).

Visfatin

The mean visfatin concentration in these patients was 3.0 ± 1.4 ng/mL. The number of patients in each group and their mean visfatin concentrations were euglyaemia (n = 8, 3.3 ± 1.2), mild (n = 11, 2.7 ± 1.9), moderate (n = 6, 2.8 ± 1.0), and severe hyperglycemia (n = 2, 4.0 ± 1.0). This resulted in an unadjusted P value of 0.650, and with the inclusion of the aforementioned confounders resulted in an adjusted P value of 0.856. None of the confounders, both alone and as an interaction with glucose level, was associated with visfatin (Table 2).

Association between Adipokines and Persistent Hyperglycemia

Adipokine concentrations were available for patients at the 48- and 72-hour time points as follows: adiponectin (n = 21), leptin (n = 23), omentin (n = 30), resistin (n = 30), and visfatin (n = 30).

Adiponectin

The mean total adiponectin concentration in these patients was 56.5 ± 24.4 μg/mL. The number of patients in each group and their mean adiponectin concentrations were: persistent hyperglycemia (n = 10, 63.2 ± 23.9), and without persistent hyperglycemia (n = 11, 50.4 ± 24.2). This resulted in an unadjusted P value of 0.237, and with the inclusion of the aforementioned confounders resulted in an adjusted P value of 0.060. Table 2 demonstrates the association between concentration of adiponectin and potential confounders, both alone and as an interaction with persistent hyperglycemia. Of these, significant associations were found between concentrations of adiponectin and APACHE II score in patients with persistent hyperglycemia (Figure 1), and between concentration of adiponectin and history of diabetes in patients with persistent hyperglycemia.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Open in a new tab

Association between adiponectin and severity of acute pancreatitis in the presence or absence of persistent hyperglycaemia. APACHE II = Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II.

Leptin

The mean leptin concentration in these patients was 6.3 ± 6.0 ng/mL. The number of patients in each group and their mean leptin concentrations were persistent hyperglycemia (n = 9, 9.3 ± 8.5) and without persistent hyperglycemia (n = 14, 4.4 ± 2.7). This resulted in an unadjusted P value of 0.055, and with the inclusion of the aforementioned confounders resulted in an adjusted P value of 0.003. Table 2 demonstrates the association between concentration of leptin and potential confounders, both alone and as an interaction with persistent hyperglycemia. Of these, significant associations were found between concentration of leptin and age, in patients with persistent hyperglycemia, and between concentration of leptin and BMI (Figure 2), both in all patients with AP and in those patients with persistent hyperglycemia.

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Open in a new tab

Association between leptin and BMI in the presence or absence of persistent hyperglycemia. BMI = body mass index.

Omentin

The mean omentin concentration in these patients was 62.7 ± 29.4 ng/mL. The number of patients in each group and their mean omentin concentrations were: persistent hyperglycemia (n = 14, 65.7 ± 32.5) and without persistent hyperglycemia (n = 16, 59.0 ± 27.0). This resulted in an unadjusted P value of 0.540, and with the inclusion of the aforementioned confounders resulted in an adjusted P value of 0.298. Table 2 demonstrates the association between the concentration of omentin and potential confounders, both alone and as an interaction with persistent hyperglycemia. Of these, significant associations were found between concentration of omentin and APACHE II score in all patients with AP (Figure 3).

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

Open in a new tab

Association between omentin and severity of acute pancreatitis. APACHE II = Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II.

Resistin

The mean resistin concentration in these patients was 15.9 ± 11.8 ng/mL. The number of patients in each group and their mean resistin concentrations were: persistent hyperglycemia (n = 14, 17.2 ± 13.5) and without persistent hyperglycemia (n = 16, 14.8 ± 10.3). This resulted in an unadjusted P value of 0.593, and with the inclusion of the aforementioned confounders resulted in an adjusted P value of 0.247. None of the confounders, both alone and as an interaction with glucose level, was associated with resistin (Table 2).

Visfatin

The mean visfatin concentration in these patients was 3.5 ± 1.7 ng/mL. The number of patients in each group and their mean visfatin concentrations were: persistent hyperglycemia (n = 14, 3.5 ± 1.6) and without persistent hyperglycemia (n = 16, 3.6 ± 1.9). This resulted in an unadjusted P value of 0.930, and with the inclusion of the aforementioned confounders resulted in an adjusted P value of 0.112. Table 2 demonstrates the association between the concentration of visfatin and potential confounders, both alone and as an interaction with persistent hyperglycemia. Of these, significant associations were found between the concentration of visfatin and sex, and between the concentration of visfatin and APACHE II score, both in patients with persistent hyperglycemia.

DISCUSSION

This is the first study to investigate the association between a panel of adipokines and early hyperglycemia in patients with AP. There were no significant associations between admission hyperglycemia and the 5 adipokines studied, in both univariate and multivariate analyses. But in patients with AP and early persistent hyperglycemia, there was a significantly higher concentration of leptin compared with those patients without persistent hyperglycemia. Further, the mean concentrations of adiponectin, omentin, and visfatin were significantly associated with APACHE II score, either in all of the patients with AP (omentin) or only among those with persistent hyperglycemia (adiponectin and visfatin).

The significant association between leptin and persistent hyperglycemia early in the course of AP is a novel finding. Leptin, a protein hormone secreted predominantly by the white adipose tissue,18 is known for its important role in regulating bodyweight. But recent evidence suggests that it also modulates peripheral insulin sensitivity and suppresses insulin secretion from pancreatic β cells.19–23 Leptin is independently and positively associated with features of the metabolic syndrome including increased body weight (directly proportional to body fat mass), insulin resistance, blood pressure, and inflammation.20,21,24,25 Intravenous administration of glucose has been demonstrated to raise leptin levels in a dose-dependent manner,19,22 suggesting that the elevated leptin levels observed in this study are an effect of hyperglycemia rather than a cause. Given that only persistent hyperglycemia, but not a single episode of early stress hyperglycemia, was associated with hyperleptinemia and taking into account that adjusting for duration of symptoms did not affect the estimates, this study provides the first evidence that secretion of leptin is influenced by the duration of hyperglycemia.

Further, leptin was found to be significantly associated with BMI both alone and as an interaction with glycemic status. While the significance of association between BMI and leptin levels has been shown in a number of disease settings,24–26 this is the first study in AP patients which shows that persistence of hyperglycemia accounts for >70% of the variation in the level of leptin in relation to patient's BMI (Figure 2). Taken together with the known action of leptin-suppressing insulin secretion and increasing insulin resistance, these findings suggest that leptin may be an important mediator of the effect of early hyperglycemia on the risk of new onset diabetes mellitus after acute and critical illnesses.1–5

This study also provides new insights into the role of adipokines in relation to the severity of AP (as determined by APACHE II score). Adiponectin has previously been identified as a predictor for AP severity.10,12,27 The new finding here is that adiponectin is positively correlated with the severity of AP in patients with persistent hyperglycemia and inversely correlated in those patients without hyperglycemia (Figure 1). Adiponectin has been acknowledged as an anti-inflammatory adipokine; however, its role in human physiology is not completely understood. It has been previously shown to increase in inflammatory diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis and inflammatory bowel disease but also has insulin sensitizing properties.28,29 Further, while visfatin was previously found to be associated with severity of AP,10,12,30 in this study, it was found to be negatively correlated with APACHE II score in patients with persistent hyperglycemia and positively correlated with APACHE II score in patients without it. In both cases, however, the correlation was too weak (r < 0.1) and further studies are required. Another important finding in this study is the significant association between omentin and APACHE II score in all the patients with AP, regardless of their glycemic status (Figure 3). Omentin is an adipokine predominately secreted by the visceral, but not subcutaneous, fat.31,32 A recent experimental study found that serum omentin levels are increased in pancreatitis (both acute and chronic) in comparison with controls.33 Taken together, these findings support an important role of visceral fat in AP34,35 and suggest that omentin should be investigated as a predictor of AP severity. A number of previous studies also suggested that leptin may be a predictor of severity of AP.36–38 This study however has not shown a similar pattern (alone: P = 0.449; interaction with persistence of hyperglycemia: P = 0.094).12,38,39

This study has several limitations that need to be acknowledged. First, the study sample size was relatively small and hence the findings need to be replicated in a larger study. Conversely, findings that have previously been identified as significant may not have had the power to be significantly detected in this study. Nevertheless, interesting and potentially important associations were found between leptin and hyperglycemia and between the severity of AP and adiponectin, omentin, and visfatin. In addition, a number of samples were not included due to them being below the limit of detection of the particular adipokine assay or the coefficient of variation being too high between duplicate samples. Second, no long-term follow-up was conducted with these patients to see whether these adipokines predicted occurrence of new-onset diabetes. Third, although this is the largest panel of adipokines to be investigated early in AP, there are a number of other proteins released by adipose tissue that may be altered in AP and will require investigation, including adipsin, apelin, chemerin, retinol binding protein 4, and vaspin.10,40 Fourth, there was an unexplained predominance of men among the patients with persistent hyperglycemia, but sex was adjusted for in multivariate analyses, yielding no significant association. Last, the assumptions for ANOVA and ANCOVA are that data meet the requirements of normality and homogeneity of variances. Most adipokines in both sets of analyses met the assumptions of normal distribution and the homogeneity of variance, with the exception of the resistin data for “on admission” analyses, the resistin data for “persistent hyperglycemia” analyses, and the leptin data for on “on admission” analyses. Given that no significant findings had been found in those analyses, we believe the use of more conservative nonparametric tests would not have significantly changed the findings.

In conclusion, this study has found, for the first time, that there is a significant association between leptin and persistent hyperglycemia early in the course of AP. Given the known actions of leptin (decreased insulin secretion and increased insulin resistance), the data suggest that persistent hyperglycemia, especially associated with an elevated BMI, may contribute to the increased risk of new-onset diabetes after acute and critical illness. Other important findings from this study that warrant further investigation is the potential role of omentin as a predictor of AP severity.

Footnotes

Abbreviations: ANCOVA = analysis of covariance, ANOVA = analysis of variance, AP = acute pancreatitis, APACHE II = Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II, BMI = body mass index, ELISA = enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

The study was supported by the Maurice & Phyllis Paykel Trust Grant to M.P. The study sponsor did not participate in the study design as well as in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data.

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Smith FG, Sheehy AM, Vincent JL, et al. Critical illness-induced dysglycaemia: diabetes and beyond. Crit Care 2010; 14:327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Gornik I, Vujaklija A, Lukic E, et al. Hyperglycemia in sepsis is a risk factor for development of type II diabetes. J Crit Care 2010; 25:263–269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Gornik I, Vujaklija-Brajkovic A, Renar IP, et al. A prospective observational study of the relationship of critical illness associated hyperglycaemia in medical ICU patients and subsequent development of type 2 diabetes. Crit Care 2010; 14:R130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.MacIntyre EJ, Majumdar SR, Gamble JM, et al. Stress hyperglycemia and newly diagnosed diabetes in 2124 patients hospitalized with pneumonia. Am J Med 2012; 125:1036.e17–1036.e23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Das SL, Singh PP, Phillips AR, et al. Newly diagnosed diabetes mellitus after acute pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gut 2014; 63:818–831. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Cui Y, Andersen DK. Pancreatogenic diabetes: special considerations for management. Pancreatology 2011; 11:279–294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hardt PD, Brendel MD, Kloer HU, et al. Is pancreatic diabetes (type 3c diabetes) underdiagnosed and misdiagnosed? Diabetes Care 2008; 31 Suppl 2:S165–S169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Knights AJ, Funnell AP, Pearson RC, et al. Adipokines and insulin action: a sensitive issue. Adipocyte 2014; 3:88–96. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Cao H. Adipocytokines in obesity and metabolic disease. J Endocrinol 2014; 220:T47–T59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Evans AC, Papachristou GI, Whitcomb DC. Obesity and the risk of severe acute pancreatitis. Minerva Gastroenterol Dietol 2010; 56:169–179. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Denroche HC, Huynh FK, Kieffer TJ. The role of leptin in glucose homeostasis. J Diabetes Investig 2012; 3:115–129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Karpavicius A, Dambrauskas Z, Sileikis A, et al. Value of adipokines in predicting the severity of acute pancreatitis: comprehensive review. World J Gastroenterol 2012; 18:6620–6627. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Sharma A, Muddana V, Lamb J, et al. Low serum adiponectin levels are associated with systemic organ failure in acute pancreatitis. Pancreas 2009; 38:907–912. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Chen CC, Wang SS, Lee FY, et al. Proinflammatory cytokines in early assessment of the prognosis of acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol 1999; 94:213–218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Papachristou GI, Whitcomb DC. Inflammatory markers of disease severity in acute pancreatitis. Clin Lab Med 2005; 25:17–37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.WHO. World Health Organization. Definition, Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes mellitus and its Complications. Part 1: Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus. Geneva: WHO, Department of Noncommunicable Disease Surveillance; 1999. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Field A. Discovering Statistics using IBM SPSS Statistics. 4th ednLos Angeles, USA: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2013. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Proenca AR, Sertie RA, Oliveira AC, et al. New concepts in white adipose tissue physiology. Braz J Med Biol Res 2014; 47:192–205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Grinspoon SK, Askari H, Landt ML, et al. Effects of fasting and glucose infusion on basal and overnight leptin concentrations in normal-weight women. Am J Clin Nutr 1997; 66:1352–1356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Minokoshi Y, Toda C, Okamoto S. Regulatory role of leptin in glucose and lipid metabolism in skeletal muscle. Indian J Endocrinol Metab 2012; 16 Suppl 3:S562–S568. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Segal KR, Landt M, Klein S. Relationship between insulin sensitivity and plasma leptin concentration in lean and obese men. Diabetes 1996; 45:988–991. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Sonnenberg GE, Krakower GR, Hoffmann RG, et al. Plasma leptin concentrations during extended fasting and graded glucose infusions: relationships with changes in glucose, insulin, and FFA. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2001; 86:4895–4900. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Petersen KF, Oral EA, Dufour S, et al. Leptin reverses insulin resistance and hepatic steatosis in patients with severe lipodystrophy. J Clin Invest 2002; 109:1345–1350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.de Courten M, Zimmet P, Hodge A, et al. Hyperleptinaemia: the missing link in the, metabolic syndrome? Diabet Med 1997; 14:200–208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Tatti P, Masselli L, Buonanno A, et al. Leptin levels in diabetic and nondiabetic subjects. Endocrine 2001; 15:305–308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kolaczynski JW, Nyce MR, Considine RV, et al. Acute and chronic effects of insulin on leptin production in humans: studies in vivo and in vitro. Diabetes 1996; 45:699–701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Tukiainen E, Kylanpaa ML, Ebeling P, et al. Leptin and adiponectin levels in acute pancreatitis. Pancreas 2006; 32:211–214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Herder C, Carstensen M, Ouwens DM. Anti-inflammatory cytokines and risk of type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab 2013; 15 Suppl 3:39–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Novotny D, Malina P, Krumpholcova P, et al. Total adiponectin, adipocyte fatty acid binding protein, fibroblast growth factor 21 and proinflammatory marker levels during the early stage of acute pancreatitis—a pilot study. Clin Lab 2015; 61:1119–1128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Schaffler A, Hamer OW, Dickopf J, et al. Admission visfatin levels predict pancreatic and peripancreatic necrosis in acute pancreatitis and correlate with clinical severity. Am J Gastroenterol 2011; 106:957–967. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Schaffler A, Neumeier M, Herfarth H, et al. Genomic structure of human omentin, a new adipocytokine expressed in omental adipose tissue. Biochim Biophys Acta 2005; 1732:96–102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Yang RZ, Lee MJ, Hu H, et al. Identification of omentin as a novel depot-specific adipokine in human adipose tissue: possible role in modulating insulin action. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2006; 290:E1253–E1261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Sit M, Aktas G, Yilmaz EE, et al. Effects of the inflammatory response on serum omentin levels in early acute and chronic pancreatitis. Clin Ter 2014; 165:e148–e152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Petrov MS. Editorial: abdominal fat: a key player in metabolic acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol 2013; 108:140–142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.O’Leary DP, O’Neill D, McLaughlin P, et al. Effects of abdominal fat distribution parameters on severity of acute pancreatitis. World J Surg 2012; 36:1679–1685. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Panek J, Bonior J, Pieton J, et al. Serum leptin and ghrelin levels in patients in the early stages of acute biliary pancreatitis and different degrees of severity. Pol Przegl Chir 2014; 86:211–217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Turkoglu A, Boyuk A, Tanriverdi MH, et al. The potential role of BMI, plasma leptin, nesfatin-1 and ghrelin levels in the early detection of pancreatic necrosis and severe acute pancreatitis: a prospective cohort study. Int J Surg 2014; 12:1310–1313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Ulger BV, Gul M, Uslukaya O, et al. New hormones to predict the severity of gallstone-induced acute pancreatitis. Turk J Gastroenterol 2014; 25:714–717. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Agilli M, Fidan G. The potential role of two appetite hormones in the early detection of pancreatic necrosis and severe acute pancreatitis: a biochemical aspect. Int J Surg 2015; 18:69–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Marra F, Bertolani C. Adipokines in liver diseases. Hepatology 2009; 50:957–969. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Medicine are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer Health

RESOURCES