Skip to main content
Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Italica logoLink to Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Italica
. 2015 Dec;35(6):379–385. doi: 10.14639/0392-100X-621

Human papillomavirus-associated cancers: a survey on otorhinolaryngologists' knowledge and attitudes on prevention

Carcinomi associati al papillomavirus umano: conoscenze, ruolo e attitudini dei medici otorinolaringoiatri in tema di prevenzione

A ODONE 1,, S VISCIARELLI 1, T LALIC 1, F PEZZETTI 1, F SPAGNOLI 1, C PASQUARELLA 1, G FERRARI 2, C SIGNORELLI 1
PMCID: PMC4755048  PMID: 26900242

SUMMARY

Human papillomavirus (HPV) infection is a recognised causal factor associated with oropharyngeal cancers. The global burden of HPVrelated oropharyngeal cancers is on the increase and is predicted to surpass the burden of cervical cancer in the near future. As evidence is accumulating on the potential effectiveness of an HPV vaccine in controlling the oropharyngeal cancer epidemic; otorhinolaryngologists assume a key role – not only in the diagnosis and treatment of HPV-related cancers – but also in educating and advocating on HPV prevention. We conducted a survey to assess Italian otorhinolaryngologists' knowledge and attitudes regarding HPV infection, HPV-related oropharyngeal diseases and cancers and available prevention measures, including vaccines. This is the first study conducted in Italy and Europe on this topic. A total of 262 Italian otorhinolaryngologists were recruited during the National Conference of the Italian Association of Otorhinolaryngologists. Our results show that Italian otorhinolaryngologists are knowledgeable regarding HPV infection and have a positive attitude towards HPV vaccine. Our findings provide a useful basis to plan, implement and evaluate targeted educational programmes and training. As we show herein, educational programmes and training specifically focusing on HPV are effective in increasing physicians' knowledge and positive attitudes towards prevention; this ultimately contributes to enhance vaccine uptake among patients and the general population. With the overall aim of controlling the burden of HPV-related cancers, resources and efforts should be devoted to promote continuing education among otorhinolaryngologists and the general medical community and to increase awareness on the role of vaccines in prevention of HPV-related cancers. In this context, there is tremendous opportunity for healthcare providers across fields to cooperate and for public health and otorhinolaryngologist communities to join forces and engage in fruitful collaboration.

KEY WORDS: Human papillomavirus, Head and Neck Neoplasms, Papillomavirus Vaccines, Knowledge, Primary prevention

Introduction

Human papillomavirus (HPV) infection is a recognised causal factor associated with head and neck cancers 1. In particular, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) of the World Health Organization identified HPV type 16 as a carcinogenic agent responsible for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) in 2012 2. Two recent reviews published in Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Italica pooled the available evidence on the molecular mechanisms of HPV-induced carcinogenesis, on the diagnostic and clinical features of HPV-induced oropharyngeal carcinomas and their prognosis and management 3 4. As emerged from the reviews, HPV-related OPSCCs are an independent clinico-pathological entity whose risk factors differ from HPV-unrelated cancers 3 4. Data from the United States 5, Australia 6 and selected European countries 7-11 show that HPV-related OPSCC account for to up to 90% of all cancers diagnosed. Importantly, the share of total OPSCC related to HPV infection is increasing over time in high-income countries: in the United States, it increased by four fold from 16% to 70% in the last decades 12; this occurred in parallel with decreasing HPV-unrelated cancer trends 10. Such tendencies have prompted some authors to suggest that there is an epidemic of HPV-induced carcinomas 10 13.

Solid evidence from randomised trials demonstrated that the two available HPV vaccines prevent cervical cancers 14 15 and other non-cervical lesions and cancers 16-18. The use of HPV vaccine to reduce the increasing burden of oropharyngeal cancers had long been hypothesised 19 20. Preliminary findings of the first randomised controlled trial to assess HPV vaccine efficacy (VE) in the oral cavity have been recently published 21. Bivalent HPV vaccine was reported to have a VE of 93% (95% CI = 63% to 100%) in reducing oral HPV infection at four year follow-up; this has potentially vast implications for prevention of HPV associated oropharyngeal cancer 21.

This new evidence combined with the large increase in OPSCC incidence worldwide underlines the crucial role that otorhinolaryngologists have not only in diagnosis and clinical management of HPV-associated OPSCC, but also in prevention of HPV infection. In line with that, the American Head and Neck Society (AHNS) has recently stated that head and neck surgeons share the responsibility of advocating and educating patients, the public and the general medical community on HPV vaccination 22. Furthermore, there is evidence that healthcare providers' advice and recommendations are the most widely used source of information influencing vaccination uptake and willingness to get vaccinated 23 24. In this context, it is important to assess otorhinolaryngologists' knowledge and attitudes with regard to HPV as this would inform the design and implementation of targeted medical education programmes with a positive impact on OPSCC prevention 25.

Limited data is available on this topic. To our knowledge, only one study is available in the literature on a sample of American Head and Neck surgeons' practices, attitudes, and knowledge regarding human papillomavirus-related cancers and vaccines 22. No similar studies have been carried out in Europe or Italy.

The primary aim of this study was to assess Italian otorhinolaryngologists' knowledge regarding HPV infection, HPV-related oropharyngeal diseases and cancers and available prevention measures, including vaccines. The secondary objective was to assess their and attitudes, opinions and perceived benefits and barriers against oral HPV infection prevention.

Materials and methods

We conducted a survey to assess Italian otorhinolaryngologists' knowledge and attitudes regarding HPV infection, HPV-related oropharyngeal diseases and cancers and available prevention measures, including vaccines.

The questionnaire

A semi-structured questionnaire was designed on the basis of the relevant evidence available in the literature, clinical practice guidelines and input from experts in the field. The questionnaire was structured in three parts: the first explored socio-demographic characteristics as well as information about education, training and professional career; the second part investigated their knowledge on HPV infection, HPV-related oral diseases and cancers and available prevention measures, including vaccines; the last section explored opinions and attitudes towards HPV vaccination.

The questionnaire was preliminarily validated through a pilot survey administered to 30 subjects to verify its effectiveness and comprehensibility. On the basis of the feedback obtained through the pilot study, critical points were discussed and revised into the final version of the questionnaire that included 28 items (Appendix 1.A and 1.B report, respectively, the Italian version and the English version of the questionnaire - published online: www. actaitalica.it).

The questionnaire was distributed in person to all otorhinolaryngologists during the National Conference of the Italian Association of Otorhinolaryngologists held in Catania, Sicily in May 2014.

Analysis

Data extraction was independently carried out by two coauthors and an electronic database was compiled.

Descriptive analyses were performed to describe the study population. A composite HPV knowledge score was built. Seventeen HPV knowledge items were included in the score. In particular, they assessed otorhinolaryngologists' knowledge on: HPV infection transmission route, HPV-associated diseases, carcinogenic HPV types, available HPV vaccines, recommended vaccination schedules and risk of adverse events, prevention objectives of HPV immunisation programmes and target population, national immunisation coverage targets and role of HPV vaccination in the broader context of primary and secondary prevention of HPV-related cancers.

For each correct answer, a point was added to the composite HPV knowledge score. Blank or wrong answers were given no points. The overall knowledge score was expressed as weighted percentage (%).

Differences in knowledge and attitudes by a priori selected relevant variables (including socio-demographic characteristics, area of residence, educational and professional profiles) were explored through univariate regression analysis. P values were derived from chi-square and t-tests. Analyses were carried out using SPSS statistical software (version 21.0).

Results

Socio-demographic characteristics of the study population

A total of 262 otorhinolaryngologists were included in the study (response rate 22%). Participants' socio-demographic characteristics are summarised in Table I.

Table I.

Socio-demographic characteristics of the study population.

Characteristics Categories n (%)
Age (years) ≤ 35
36-50
51-60
≥ 61
Missing
55 (21%)
81 (30.9%)
92 (35.1%)
30 (11.5%)
4 (1.5%)
Gender Male
Female
Missing
168 (64.1%)
91 (34.7%)
3 (1.2%)
Years of clinical practice ≥40
39-25
24-10
≤9
Missing
16 (6.1%)
105 (40.1%)
86 (32.8%)
44 (16.8%)
11 (4.2%)
Location of practice in Italy North
Centre
South and islands
Missing
120 (45.8%)
43 (16.4%)
88 (33.6%)
11 (4.2%)

The majority of respondents were male (64%, n = 168) and 66% had between 35 and 60 years (n = 173). With regards to geographical distribution, almost half were from Northern Italy (45.8%, n = 120). Overall, almost 50% (46.2%, n = 121) had more than 25 years of clinical practice experience; 71% of physicians (n = 185) reported to have participated in educational programmes and training specifically focusing on prevention of HPV infection.

Level of knowledge on HPV infection and vaccines

Overall, the average knowledge score was 64.1% (SD = 14.8), ranging from 23.5% to 88.2%. Physicians correctly identified HPV infection transmission routes: sexual (99.2%, n = 260) and cutaneous (62.6%, n = 164). However, more than half also believed that transplacental (64.5%, n = 169), haematic (67.9%, n = 178) and air (58%, n = 152) were transmission routes of HPV infection.

Moreover, 96% of physicians (n = 251) knew that HPV infection is associated with oropharyngeal cancer and 74% (n=193) knew it is associated with respiratory papillomatosis. In addition, they were aware of HPV-related diseases: genital warts (80.9%, n = 212) and cervical (99.6%, n = 261), vulvar and vaginal (79.8%, n = 209), anal (80.9%, n = 212) and penile (80.2%, n = 210) cancer. Less than 20% of respondents (17%, n = 45) identified both HPV types 16 and 18 as carcinogenic.

In addition, 48.9% of physicians (n=128) were aware of the existence both bi-valent and quadri-valent vaccines; 3.4% (n=9) thought only one vaccine is available and 47% (n = 124) ignored that any vaccine against HPV infection existed at all. Among who knew both vaccines exist, 24% (n = 31) though its administration has no risk of side effects and 56% (n = 72) were not able to answer the question.

Of interest, 77.5% (n = 203) knew that the age target for the administration of the HPV vaccine in young females is 12 years and that 12-year-old girl cohorts are actively offered free of charge the vaccine through the Italian health system. A total of 20% (n = 53) of subjects knew that three doses of vaccine were at the time recommended, while 54% (n = 141) admitted to not know it. With regard to HPV immunisation coverage rate target, only 12% (n = 31) knew the Ministry of Health set it at 95%. Lastly, 35% (n = 90) believed that immunisation against HPV did not rule out secondary prevention of HPV-related cancers. The association between general knowledge on HPV and selected relevant variables is reported in Table II. Having participated in education programmes and training on HPV prevention was positively associated with increasing knowledge score (p < 0.001). When deconstructing the score and taking into consideration single items, having participated in education programmes and training remained positively associated with better knowledge on HPV transmission routes (p < 0.001) and availability of HPV vaccines, (although the latter was not statistically significant, p = 0.07). Minor differences in knowledge were reported by geographical origin of respondents. No socio-demographic characteristics were significantly associated with better knowledge on HPV (Table II).

Table II.

Composite HPV Knowledge score and single knowledge items distribution by selected characteristics.

Overall knowledge
score
(mean, SD)
p value* knowledge on HPV
infection transmission
route
(n, %)
p value* Awareness of
existence of both
vaccines (N, %)
p value*
Age
 ≤35 66.2 (13) 0.1 39 (24.1%) 0.13 33 (25.6%) 0.59
 36-50 64 (14.4) 52 (32.1%) 39 (30.2%)
 51-60 60.5 (14.5) 58 (35.8%) 43 (33.3%)
 ≥61 61.4 (15.7) 13 (8%) 14 (10.9%)
Gender
 Male 62.1 (15) 0.26 104 (64.2%) 0.90 74 (57.4%) 0.04
 Female 64.3 (13.3) 58 (35.8%) 53 (41.1%)
 missing
Location
 North 64.7 (13.2) 0.003 73 (45.1%) 0.004 60 (46.5%) 0.88
 Centre 66.1 (9.5) 35 (21.6%) 19 (14.7%)
 South and islands 58.8 (16.6) 49 (30.2%) 45 (34.9%)
 missing 5 (3.1%) 5 (3.9%)
HPV-specific educational programs
 Yes 66.2 (11.3) <0.001 137 (84.6%) <0.001 101 (78.3%) 0.07
 No 58.6 (16.9) 13 (8%) 18 (14%)
 missing 12 (7.4%) 10 (7.8%)
*

p values obtained through chi-square and one-way anova testing.

Providers' attitudes and opinions on prevention of HPV infection

The majority of respondents believed that the main objective of HPV vaccination is primary prevention of HPV-related cancers (87%, n = 227). When asked about the perceived usefulness of HPV vaccine, 66% of physicians (n = 173) considered HPV vaccine as a public health priority, 28% (n = 73) as a very important prevention tool, 3% (n = 9) as useful but not essential and 1% (n = 3) as absolutely useless. Respondents reported that the ideal target population to receive HPV vaccine is females before the start of sexual activity (74%, n = 191). Importantly, 22% (n = 56) thought the target population should include both males and females. More than 50% (54.2%, n = 142) reported to be asked about HPV vaccination benefits by patients as well as about vaccine side effects (12.6%, n = 33) and duration of protection (13.4%, n = 35). With regard to perceived barriers to HPV vaccination, respondents identified: inadequate information available to the general public (63.4%, n = 166), lack of vaccine benefits perception (66.8%, n = 175), parental reluctance (64.9%, n = 170) and low healthcare providers' advocacy (59.2%, n = 155). Almost all physicians (97%, n = 254) expressed their willingness to recommend HPV vaccination to patients.

Participants indicated the following as potential effective strategies to increase HPV vaccine uptake among adolescents: educational campaign through new media (60.7%, n = 159), this including websites targeting young people (29%, n = 76), school vaccination programmes (38.6%, n = 101) and counselling (40.5%, n = 106).

Discussion

The increasing key role of otorhinolaryngologists in promoting prevention of HPV-associated cancers has recently been advocated at the national and international level. Our results show that Italian otorhinolaryngologists are knowledgeable regarding HPV infection and have a positive attitude towards HPV vaccine. These findings are of fundamental importance in light of: 1) the unfolding epidemic of HPV-related head and neck cancers 13 and 2) the mounting evidence on the efficacy of vaccine against HPV oral infection.

Overall knowledge scores exceeded 70% in almost 50% of respondents and, on specific items, it was higher compared to percentages we previously reported among general practitioners 26. In particular, otorhinolaryngologists scored high on knowledge-based questions on HPV infection transmission and association with oral papillomatosis and oropharyngeal cancers as well as with cervical and other non-cervical cancers. More importantly, a large share of otorhinolaryngologists showed a positive attitude towards prevention of HPV-related cancers considering HPV vaccine as an effective prevention tool and a public health priority.

Some key issues that emerged from the survey merit discussion. First and of crucial significance, the large majority of respondents reported to be asked about the benefits of, side effects and duration of protection HPV vaccine, showing there is high demand for information and advice on it. Second, we report a positive correlation between having participated in educational programs and training and both high knowledge level and positive attitude towards HPV prevention among physicians. This held true for overall knowledge score as well as for single knowledge items underlining the importance of continuous medical education and training to increase the delivery of preventive care 27 28.

Of note, more than a fifth of physicians thought the target population should include both males and females. This is in line with the new immunisation schedule recommended by Italian scientific societies that include both males and females as HPV vaccine target populations 29. HPV vaccine is currently recommended to males in the United States 30 and in a few European countries 31; however, as evidence accumulates on the effectiveness of vaccinating males to prevent HPV-related conditions in the male population as well as to enhance herd immunity in the general population 32 33, more countries are considering adhering to universal vaccination 18 34. In particular, experts are increasingly advocating for HPV vaccination in males for the prevention of oropharyngeal cancers 33 35 36. Lack of knowledge on specific items emerged: less than 20% of respondents correctly identified carcinogenic HPV types and almost half were not aware of the existence both bivalent and quadri-valent vaccines.

To our knowledge, this is the first study conducted in Italy and in Europe on the topic. Only one study, published on JAMA Otolaryngology – Head & Neck Surgery, is available in the literature on a sample of American Head and Neck surgeons' practices, attitudes and knowledge regarding HPV-related cancers and vaccines 22. The authors reported that the respondents were relatively knowledgeable about HPV and had generally positive attitudes and beliefs about HPV education and vaccination. Although such findings are in line with our results, we argue that such knowledge is likely to be setting-specific and to vary depending on factors such as local healthcare systems, health policy strategies and medical curricula and training.

Although limited data is available on otorhinolaryngologists, several recent studies have explored knowledge of HPV among healthcare providers, including general practitioners (GPs) 37-41 and other specialists 41-43. We have previously reported on Italian GPs' knowledge and perceived role in HPV prevention identifying some lack of knowledge on specific areas and room for improvement in communication with parents and adolescents on the topic 26. In line with our findings, studies conducted with other specialists highlighted the importance of educating healthcare providers involved at different levels in HPV prevention 37-45.

Although those estimates come from heterogeneous studies and are likely to be influenced by the competing effect of different socio-demographic, genetic and environmental risk factors as well as HPV-testing methods and quality 46, such high percentages underlines how HPV-related OPSCC burden is a relevant clinical and public health concern and suggests that primary prevention may play a key role in reducing it.

The findings we report must be considered in light of limitations. First, the relatively low response rate limits the generalisability of our findings to the population of Italian otorhinolaryngologists. This has historically been a critical issue when conducting research among medical professionals as reported elsewhere 43. However, the only other available study on the topic conducted in the United States had a similar sample size and response rate 22. The small sample size might have prevented our analysis to have enough statistical power to detect specific factors associated with knowledge and attitudes toward HPV prevention. Lastly, we were not able to compare characteristics of respondents and non-respondents. Given the study design, we cannot rule out the risk of selection bias; in fact, assuming that more committed and knowledgeable physicians are more likely to complete the survey, this might have led to an overestimation of the overall knowledge on HPV infection and prevention. On the other hand – different from other similar studies which were self-administered online 22 43 – our survey was administered in person by trained staff, this limiting the risk of information bias. Finally, the questionnaire focused on primary prevention and did not explore otorhinolaryngologists' knowledge on available diagnostic tools for HPV infection, a topic of growing interest 43. However, to increase the response rate we preferred to keep the questionnaire relatively short and we plan to explore this and other topic in future surveys.

Conclusions

The global burden of HPV-related oropharyngeal cancers is increasing and is predicted to surpass the burden of cervical cancer in the near future 12. As evidence is accumulating on the potential effectiveness of HPV vaccine in controlling the oropharyngeal cancer epidemic 13 21, otorhinolaryngologists assume a key role – not only in the diagnosis and treatment of HPV-related cancers – but also in educating and advocating on HPV prevention 22.

To our knowledge, this is the first study conducted in the European Union to assess otorhinolaryngologists' knowledge and attitudes on HPV infection and prevention. Our results show that Italian otorhinolaryngologists are knowledgeable regarding HPV infection and have a positive attitude towards HPV vaccine. However, we identified areas of potential improvement. Our findings provide a useful basis to plan, implement and evaluate targeted educational programmes and training. As we showed herein, educational programmes and training specifically focusing on HPV are effective in increasing physician knowledge and positive attitude towards prevention 23. In a global context of growing vaccine hesitancy, this would contributes to enhance vaccine uptake among patients and the general population 47-51. With the overall aim of controlling the burden of HPV-related cancers, resources and efforts should be devoted to promote continuing education among otorhinolaryngologists and the general medical community and to increase awareness on the role of vaccines in prevention of HPV-related cancers. In this context, there is tremendous opportunity for healthcare providers across fields to cooperate and for public health and otorhinolaryngologist communities to join forces and engage in fruitful collaboration.

References

  • 1.D'Souza G, Kreimer AR, Viscidi R,, et al. Case-control study of human papillomavirus and oropharyngeal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:1944–1956. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa065497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. The World Health Organization , author. IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans: volume 100BBiological Agents. A review of human carcinogens. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2012. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Boscolo-Rizzo P, Mistro A, Bussu F, et al. New insights into human papillomavirus-associated head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2013;33:77–87. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Mannarini L, Kratochvil V, Calabrese L, et al. Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) in head and neck region: review of literature. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2009;29:119–126. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Chaturvedi AK, Engels EA, Anderson WF, et al. Incidence trends for human papillomavirus-related and -unrelated oral squamous cell carcinomas in the United States. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:612–619. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.14.1713. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hocking JS, Stein A, Conway EL, et al. Head and neck cancer in Australia between 1982 and 2005 show increasing incidence of potentially HPV-associated oropharyngeal cancers. Br J Cancer. 2011;104:886–891. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6606091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Blomberg M, Nielsen A, Munk C, et al. Trends in head and neck cancer incidence in Denmark, 1978-2007: focus on human papillomavirus associated sites. Int J Cancer. 2011;129:733–741. doi: 10.1002/ijc.25699. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ligier K, Belot A, Launoy G, et al. Descriptive epidemiology of upper aerodigestive tract cancers in France: incidence over 1980-2005 and projection to 2010. Oral Oncol. 2011;47:302–307. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2011.02.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Reddy VM, Cundall-Curry D, Bridger MW. Trends in the incidence rates of tonsil and base of tongue cancer in England, 1985-2006. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2010;92:655–659. doi: 10.1308/003588410X12699663904871. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Nasman A, Attner P, Hammarstedt L, et al. Incidence of human papillomavirus (HPV) positive tonsillar carcinoma in Stockholm, Sweden: an epidemic of viral-induced carcinoma? Int J Cancer. 2009;125:362–366. doi: 10.1002/ijc.24339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Rietbergen MM, Leemans CR, Bloemena E, et al. Increasing prevalence rates of HPV attributable oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas in the Netherlands as assessed by a validated test algorithm. Int J Cancer. 2013;132:1565–1571. doi: 10.1002/ijc.27821. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Chaturvedi AK, Engels EA, Pfeiffer RM, et al. Human papillomavirus and rising oropharyngeal cancer incidence in the United States. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:4294–4301. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.36.4596. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Sturgis EM, Cinciripini PM. Trends in head and neck cancer incidence in relation to smoking prevalence: an emerging epidemic of human papillomavirus-associated cancers? Cancer. 2007;110:1429–1435. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22963. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Lehtinen M, Paavonen J, Wheeler CM, et al. Overall efficacy of HPV-16/18 AS04-adjuvanted vaccine against grade 3 or greater cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: 4-year endof- study analysis of the randomised, double-blind PATRICIA trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13:1989–1999. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70286-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Munoz N, Kjaer SK, Sigurdsson K, et al. Impact of human papillomavirus (HPV)-6/11/16/18 vaccine on all HPV-associated genital diseases in young women. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010;102:325–339. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djp534. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Giuliano AR, Palefsky JM, Goldstone S, et al. Efficacy of quadrivalent HPV vaccine against HPV Infection and disease in males. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:401–411. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0909537. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Palefsky JM, Giuliano AR, Goldstone S, et al. HPV vaccine against anal HPV infection and anal intraepithelial neoplasia. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:1576–1585. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1010971. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Crosignani P, Stefani A, Fara GM, et al. Towards the eradication of HPV infection through universal specific vaccination. BMC public health. 2013;13:642. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-642. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Gillison ML, Chaturvedi AK, Lowy DR. HPV prophylactic vaccines and the potential prevention of noncervical cancers in both men and women. Cancer. 2008;113(10 Suppl):3036–3046. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23764. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Campisi G, Giovannelli L. Controversies surrounding human papilloma virus infection, head & neck vs oral cancer, implications for prophylaxis and treatment. Head Neck Oncol. 2009;1:8. doi: 10.1186/1758-3284-1-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Herrero R, Quint W, Hildesheim A, et al. Reduced prevalence of oral human papillomavirus (HPV) 4 years after bivalent HPV vaccination in a randomized clinical trial in Costa Rica. PLoS One. 2013;8:e68329. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Malloy KM, Ellender SM, Goldenberg D. A survey of current practices, attitudes, and knowledge regarding human papillomavirus-related cancers and vaccines among head and neck surgeons. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013;139:1037–1042. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2013.4452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Brewer NT, Gottlieb SL, Reiter PL, et al. Longitudinal predictors of human papillomavirus vaccine initiation among adolescent girls in a high-risk geographic area. Sex Transm Dis. 2011;38:197–204. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e3181f12dbf. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kessels SJ, Marshall HS, Watson M, et al. Factors associated with HPV vaccine uptake in teenage girls: a systematic review. Vaccine. 2012;30:3546–3456. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.03.063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Ferro A, Odone A, Siddu A, et al. Monitoring the web to support vaccine coverage: results of two years of the portal VaccinarSi. Epidemiol Prev. 2015;39(4 Suppl 1):88–93. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Signorelli C, Odone A, Pezzetti F, et al. [Human Papillomavirus infection and vaccination: knowledge and attitudes of Italian general practitioners]. Epidemiol Prev. 2014;38(6 Suppl 2):88–92. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Margolis PA, Lannon CM, Stuart JM, et al. Practice based education to improve delivery systems for prevention in primary care: randomised trial. BMJ. 2004:328–388. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38009.706319.47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Odone A, Fara GM, Giammaco G, et al. The future of immunization policies in Italy and in the European Union: The Declaration of Erice. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2015;11:1268–1271. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2015.1019980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Bonanni P, Azzari C, Castiglia P, et al. [The 2014 lifetime immunization schedule approved by the Italian scientific societies. Italian Society of Hygiene, Preventive Medicine, and Public Health. Italian Society of Pediatrics. Italian Federation of Pediatric Physicians. Italian Federation of General Medical Physicians. Arezzo Service of Legal Medicine]. Epidemiol Prev. 2014;38(6 Suppl 2):131–146. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Markowitz LE, Dunne EF, Saraiya M, et al. Human papillomavirus vaccination: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) MMWR Recomm Rep. 2014;63(RR-05):1–30. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Bresse X, Goergen C, Prager B, et al. Universal vaccination with the quadrivalent HPV vaccine in Austria: impact on virus circulation, public health and cost-effectiveness analysis. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2014;14:269–281. doi: 10.1586/14737167.2014.881253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Lehtinen M, Apter D, Baussano I, et al. Characteristics of a cluster-randomized phase IV human papillomavirus vaccination effectiveness trial. Vaccine. 2015;33:1284–1290. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.12.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Audisio RA, Icardi G, Isidori AM, et al. Public health value of universal HPV vaccination. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2015 Aug 04; doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2015.07.015. [Epub ahead of print] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Laurence J. HPV-linked oral cancer: another argument for universal HPV vaccination of boys and girls. AIDS Read. 2008;18:345–346. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Isaranuwatchai W, Graham DM, Siu LL, et al. Could the human papillomavirus vaccination be cost-effective in males for the prevention of oropharyngeal cancer? Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2014;14:763–765. doi: 10.1586/14737167.2014.946012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Barroso LF, 2nd, Wilkin T. Human papillomavirus vaccination in males: the state of the science. Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2011;13:175–181. doi: 10.1007/s11908-010-0163-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Mazza D, Petrovic K, Grech C, et al. HPV vaccination in women aged 27 to 45 years: what do general practitioners think? BMC Womens Health. 2014;14:91. doi: 10.1186/1472-6874-14-91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Mazza D, Petrovic K, Chakraborty S. HPV vaccination of adult women: an audit of Australian general practitioners. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2012;52:528–533. doi: 10.1111/ajo.12002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Lasset C, Kalecinski J, Regnier V, et al. Practices and opinions regarding HPV vaccination among French general practitioners: evaluation through two cross-sectional studies in 2007 and 2010. Int J Public Health. 2014;59:519–528. doi: 10.1007/s00038-014-0555-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Berraho M, Fakir SE, Abda N, et al. [[HPV and cervical cancer: knowledge and practices of physicians in Fez]]. Sante Publique. 2013;25:351–357. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.D'Hauwers KW, Gadet PF, Donders AR, et al. Impact of medical education on knowledge and attitudes regarding the human papilloma virus and vaccination: comparison before and 6 years after the introduction of the vaccines. Vaccine. 2013;31:5843–5847. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.09.068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Daley E, DeBate R, Dodd V, et al. Exploring awareness, attitudes, and perceived role among oral health providers regarding HPV-related oral cancers. J Public Health Dent. 2011;71:136–142. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-7325.2011.00212.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Daley E, Dodd V, DeBate R, et al. Prevention of HPV-related oral cancer: assessing dentists' readiness. Public Health. 2014;128:231–238. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2013.12.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Signorelli C, Odone A. Advocacy communication, vaccines and the role of scientific societies. Ann Ig. 2015;27:737–747. doi: 10.7416/ai.2015.2066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Odone A, Ferrari A, Spagnoli F, et al. Effectiveness of interventions that apply new media to improve vaccine uptake and vaccine coverage. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2015;11:72–82. doi: 10.4161/hv.34313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Termine N, Panzarella V, Falaschini S, et al. HPV in oral squamous cell carcinoma vs head and neck squamous cell carcinoma biopsies: a meta-analysis (1988-2007) Ann Oncol. 2008;19:1681–1690. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdn372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Signorelli C, Odone A, Conversano M, et al. Deaths after Fluad flu vaccine and the epidemic of panic in Italy. BMJ. 2015;350:h116. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Bonanni P, Ferro A, Guerra R, et al. Vaccine coverage in Italy and assessment of the 2012-2014 National Immunization Prevention Plan. Epidemiol Prev. 2015;39(4 Suppl 1):146–158. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Odone A, Signorelli C. When vaccine hesitancy makes headlines. Vaccine. 2015 Dec 01; doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.11.051. pii: S0264-410X(15)01701-6. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.11.051. [Epub ahead of print] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Odone A, Chiesa V, Ciorba V, et al. Influenza and immunization: a quantitative study of media coverage in the season of the "Fluad case". Epidemiol Prev. 2015;39(4 Suppl 1):139–145. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Signorelli C, Odone A, Bonanni P, et al. New Italian immunisation plan is built on scientific evidence: Carlo Signorelli and colleagues reply to news article by Michael Day. BMJ. 2015;351:h6775–h6775. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h6775. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Italica are provided here courtesy of Pacini Editore

RESOURCES