Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Feb 15.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2015 Dec 5;127:307–323. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.11.069

Table A.1.

Effectsa,b for the localizer contrastc (sentences > nonwords) and the critical contrast (object-extracted > subject-extracted) in the “core” language system

fROI Localizer effect Syntactic complexity effect
LIFGorb t=5.79; p<10−4 t=3.41; p<0.01
LIFG t=8.31; p<10−4 t=4.66; p<10−3
LMFG t=6.72; p<10−4 t=4.63; p<10−3
LAntTemp t=6.28; p<10−4 t=2.34; p<0.05
LMidAntTemp t=7.52; p<10−4 t=4.19; p<10−3
LMidPostTemp t=10.44; p<10−4 t=5.43; p<10−3
LPostTemp t=9.17; p<10−4 t=5.43; p<10−3
LAngG t=8.16; p<10−4 t<1; n.s.
a

We report uncorrected p values (df=12), but all effects remain significant after an FDR correction for the number of regions (n=8).

b

See also Figure 4.

c

Estimated in data not used for defining the fROIs, using across-runs cross-validation.