Skip to main content
PMC home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2016 Feb 1;6:20094. doi: 10.1038/srep20094

Singlet oxygen production in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii under heat stress

Ankush Prasad 1, Ursula Ferretti 1, Michaela Sedlářová 2, Pavel Pospíšil 1,a
PMCID: PMC4757480  PMID: 26831215

Abstract

In the current study, singlet oxygen formation by lipid peroxidation induced by heat stress (40 °C) was studied in vivo in unicellular green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Primary and secondary oxidation products of lipid peroxidation, hydroperoxide and malondialdehyde, were generated under heat stress as detected using swallow-tailed perylene derivative fluorescence monitored by confocal laser scanning microscopy and high performance liquid chromatography, respectively. Lipid peroxidation was initiated by enzymatic reaction as inhibition of lipoxygenase by catechol and caffeic acid prevented hydroperoxide formation. Ultra-weak photon emission showed formation of electronically excited species such as triplet excited carbonyl, which, upon transfer of excitation energy, leads to the formation of either singlet excited chlorophyll or singlet oxygen. Alternatively, singlet oxygen is formed by direct decomposition of hydroperoxide via Russell mechanisms. Formation of singlet oxygen was evidenced by the nitroxyl radical 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine-1-oxyl detected by electron paramagnetic resonance spin-trapping spectroscopy and the imaging of green fluorescence of singlet oxygen sensor green detected by confocal laser scanning microscopy. Suppression of singlet oxygen formation by lipoxygenase inhibitors indicates that singlet oxygen may be formed via enzymatic lipid peroxidation initiated by lipoxygenase.

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are formed by activation of non-reactive molecular oxygen during photosynthetic light reaction in chloroplasts, cellular respiration in mitochondria and defence against microorganisms in phagocyte plasma membrane1. The activation of molecular oxygen occurs either by an electron transport reaction known to form superoxide anion radical (O2•−), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), hydroxyl radical (HO•) or by energy transfer reaction known to form singlet oxygen (1O2). Under circumstances when the formation of ROS exceeds the antioxidant capacity of the system, the equilibrium between production and scavenging is disturbed and the dangerous ROS induces damage to biomolecules, such are lipids, proteins and nucleic acids1.

Oxidation of lipids, known as lipid peroxidation, is initiated both by the non-enzymatic reactions involving the oxidation of lipids by ROS or by enzymatic reactions comprising oxidation of lipid mediated by enzymes such as lipoxygenase2. In the non-enzymatic reaction pathway, the lipid peroxidation is initiated either by radical ROS comprising HO•, generated by the Fenton reaction1,3, or by non-radical ROS involving 1O2 formed by the Type II photosensitisation reaction4,5,6. The initiation of lipid peroxidation by HO• involves abstraction of weakly bonded hydrogen from polyunsaturated fatty acids known to form alkyl radical (L•) which in the presence of molecular oxygen, forms peroxyl radical (LOO•)1. Hydrogen abstraction from another polyunsaturated fatty acid by ROO• forms hydroperoxides (LOOH)7. The initiation of lipid peroxidation by 1O2 involves the cycloaddition of 1O2 to polyunsaturated fatty acids that forms LOOH. In the enzymatic reaction pathway, lipid peroxidation is initiated by lipoxygenase known to exhibit dioxygenase activity. In this reaction, the ferric non-heme iron catalyzes the initial hydrogen abstraction forming ferrous non-heme iron and R•. The insertion of O2 at the C-atom of the polyunsaturated fatty acid known to form LOO• is followed by reduction of ferrous non-heme iron and protonation of LOO• to LOOH. Under reducing conditions such as reduced free and bound metals, LOOH is reduced to alkoxyl radical (LO•) which might further cause hydrogen abstraction from nearby located polyunsaturated fatty acids.

Several lines of evidence have been provided that indicates that lipid peroxidation is associated with formation of electronically excited species8,9. Decomposition of LOOH into peroxyl radical was proposed as a potential source of electronically excited species in biological systems10,11,12,13,14. In this reaction, LOOH is oxidized to LOO• under oxidizing conditions such are oxidized transition metals, ferric heme iron of cytochrome c, peroxynitrite, chloroperoxide, and hypochlorous acid. Peroxyl radical might either undergoes cyclization to dioxetane or recombines to tetroxide11,15,16,17,18,19. These high energy intermediates decompose to triplet excited carbonyls (3L = O*) which might transfer triplet energy either to pigments forming excited pigments or molecular oxygen forming 1O210,20,21,22,23,24. In addition, tetroxide might decompose directly to 1O2 by Russell mechanism25.

Under the environmental conditions, photosynthetic organisms such as cyanobacteria, algae and plants are exposed to various abiotic and biotic stress factors. Heat stress is a major environmental stress that is known to be involved in lipid peroxidation in photosynthetic organisms26,27,28. Extensive lipid peroxidation under heat stress was shown to be promoted by the enhancement in polyunsaturation of fatty acid in which hydrogen abstraction from the carbon next to double bond is energetically more feasible29,30. In agreement with this proposal, experimental data from many models indicate that the exposure of photosynthetic organisms to heat stress leads to the formation of lipid peroxidation secondary product, malondialdehyde (MDA), as detected by TBARS assay31,32,33,34. In vitro, it has been shown that exposure to heat stress results in the formation of the MDA-(TBA)2 adduct both in thylakoid membranes and PSII membranes isolated from higher plants31,32,33. In vivo, it has been demonstrated that exposure of leaf and root segments of Phalaenopsis to 40 °C enhanced lipoxygenase activity and MDA formation31,32,33,34.

Moreover, experimental evidence supports in vitro1O2 formation in chloroplasts, thylakoid and PSII membranes exposed to heat stress31,35,36. Using EPR spin-trapping spectroscopy, Hideg and Vass (1993) demonstrated that exposure of mung bean chloroplasts and etiolated thylakoid membranes to a non-physiological high temperature of 75 °C results in 1O2 formation. The authors tentatively attributed 1O2 formation to lipid peroxidation, although no experimental data were presented in this study. Later, it was shown that exposure of PSII membranes to 47 °C is accompanied by 1O2 formation35. The observation that 1O2 formation was unaffected either by catalase (known to decompose hydrogen peroxide to water and molecular oxygen) or mannitol as HO• scavenger revealed that HO• formed by incomplete water oxidation on PSII electron donor side unlikely initiated lipid peroxidation. Similarly, 1O2 formation was observed when spinach thylakoid and PSII membranes were exposed to heat stress at the temperature of 40 °C31. The authors demonstrated that the amount of MDA estimated spectroscopically by detection of the MDA-(TBA)2 adduct was formed in parallel to 1O2 formation. Based on the observation that the QB site on the PSII electron acceptor side was primarily damaged by heat stress, the authors proposed that 1O2 is formed near the QB site. In spite of the fact that 1O2 formation was demonstrated in chloroplast, thylakoid and PSII membranes, experimental evidence on 1O2 formation in-vivo has not yet been provided.

Our current study provides in vivo evidence that 1O2 is formed in the unicellular green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. It is demonstrated herein that exposure of Chlamydomonas cells to heat stress (40 °C) results in the formation of 1) LOOH, the primary product of lipid peroxidation, as monitored by swallow-tailed perylene derivative (Spy-LHP) fluorescence as detected by confocal laser scanning microscopy, 2) MDA, the secondary product of lipid peroxidation, as monitored by HPLC detection of MDA-DNPH adduct, 3) 3L = O* as measured by ultra-weak photon emission and 4) 1O2 localized by fluorescence of Singlet Oxygen Sensor Green (SOSG) visualized by confocal laser scanning microscopy and measured by electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spin-trapping spectroscopy utilising the oxidation of lipophilic diamagnetic 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine (TEMP). Attempts have been made to discuss the mechanism of 1O2 formation via lipid peroxidation initiated by enzymatic reaction catalysed by lipoxygenase.

Results

Hydroperoxide imaging using confocal laser scanning microscopy

The formation of LOOH in Chlamydomonas cells exposed to 40 °C was monitored using a fluorescent probe Spy-LHP detected by laser confocal scanning microscopy. Spy-LHP is known to react with LOOH leading to the formation of its oxidized derivative, Spy-LHPOx which provides a strong fluorescence at 535 nm. Figure 1 shows Nomarski DIC, Spy-LHPOx fluorescence, chlorophyll fluorescence and integral distribution of Spy-LHPOx fluorescence intensity measured in Chlamydomonas cells. Whereas no Spy-LHPOx fluorescence was detected in non-heated Chlamydomonas cells, pronounced Spy-LHPOx fluorescence was observed in heated Chlamydomonas cells exposed to 40 °C. The observation that localisation of chlorophyll fluorescence corresponds to localisation of Spy-LHPOx fluorescence indicates that LOOH is formed mainly in chloroplasts. In addition to this, bright spots of Spy-LHPOx fluorescence were observed which can be attributed to small-sized organelles such as vacuoles which usually are found in Chlamydomonas cells under various stress conditions. The integral distribution of Spy-LHPOx fluorescence intensity shows that Spy-LHPOx fluorescence in heated Chlamydomonas cells is enhanced by about 4 times as compared to non-heated Chlamydomonas cells. These results reveal that exposure of Chlamydomonas cells to heat stress leads to the formation of LOOH.

Figure 1. Detection of hydroperoxide in Chlamydomonas cells by laser confocal scanning microscopy.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

The formation of LOOH was measured in non-heated and heated Chlamydomonas cells in the presence and the absence of catechol and caffeic acid using fluorescent probe Spy-LHPOx. Heated cells were treated for 30 min in a water bath at 40 °C under dark. The images represent from left to right: Nomarski DIC, Spy-LHPOx fluorescence, chlorophyll fluorescence and integral distribution of Spy-LHPOx signal intensity (0–4096) in the 12-bit microphotographs.

To test whether lipid peroxidation is initiated by non-enzymatic (ROS) or enzymatic (lipoxygenase) reactions, the effect of lipoxygenase inhibitors such as catechol and caffeic acid on LOOH formation was measured in heated Chlamydomonas cells (Fig. 1). Catechol and caffeic acid are known to inhibit lipoxygenase by binding to non-heme iron of enzyme and enzyme-substrate complex, respectively37,38. In non-heated Chlamydomonas cells, no effect of catechol on Spy-LHPOx fluorescence was observed. Interestingly, catechol suppressed significantly Spy-LHPOx fluorescence in heated Chlamydomonas cells as compared to heated cells measured in the absence of catechol. Similarly, no effect of caffeic acid on Spy-LHPOx fluorescence was observed in non-heated Chlamydomonas cell while Spy-LHPOx fluorescence was pronouncedly suppressed by caffeic acid in heated Chlamydomonas cells. The integral distribution of Spy-LHPOx fluorescence showed that in the presence of catechol and caffeic acid, Spy-LHPOx fluorescence was suppressed by approximately 40% and 70%, respectively, in heated Chlamydomonas cell. These results revealed that the inhibition of lipoxygenase by catechol and caffeic acid partially prevents LOOH formation.

Quantification of hydroperoxides using ferrous oxidation-xylenol orange assay

To quantify LOOH formation in Chlamydomonas cells, ferrous oxidation-xylenol orange (FOX) colorimetric assay was used. In this method, the oxidation of ferrous to ferric irons by LOOH occurs with the subsequent binding of ferric irons to the dye xylenol orange, causing changes in its colour from yellow to red. Figure 2A shows FOX absorption spectra obtained as difference of spectra observed in heated and non-heated Chlamydomonas cells. The observation that absorption at 560 nm increased with a period of heat treatment shows gradual LOOH formation. The observation that catalase has no significant effect on absorption at 560 nm (data not shown) reveals that absorption changes are solely related to the LOOH formation with no contribution of H2O2. For determination of LOOH concentration formed in heated cells, the calibration curve was measured by FOX assay with H2O2 as the substrate (Fig. 2B, insert). The concentration of LOOH formed in heated Chlamydomonas cells is in the concentration range of several units of micromoles (Fig. 2B).

Figure 2. Quantification of hydroperoxide formation in Chlamydomonas cells ferrous oxidation-xylenol orange assay.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

In (A) absorption spectra of FOX reagent with Chlamydomonas cells heated for 10, 20 and 30 min measured in the spectral ranges of 400–750 nm. In (B) the concentrations of LOOH was established from calibration curve (equation y  =  0.0025x−0.0016) were as following: 1.12 ± 0.19 μmol (10 min), 3.49 ± 0.26 μmol (20 min) and 7.19 ± 1.11 μmol (30 min). The coefficient of determination R2 was determined as 0.9701. Insert shows calibration curve of FOX assay obtained using H2O2 as substrate.

Determination of the MDA-DNPH adduct using HPLC

To examine the level of lipid peroxidation in Chlamydomonas cells exposed to heat stress, a secondary product of lipid peroxidation MDA was detected using isocratic reversed-phase HPLC separation of MDA-DNPH adduct. Figure 3A shows a chromatogram of the MDA-DNPH adduct measured in the Chlamydomonas cells treated at 40 °C for 0 min and 30 min. The MDA-DNPH adduct peak was observed at the retention time 2.75 min. To confirm the retention time of the MDA-DNPH adduct observed in Chlamydomonas cells, chromatogram of MDA standard 1,1,3,3-tetrahydroxypropane (TEP) was measured (Fig. 3B). To determine the concentration of MDA-DNPH adduct observed in heated cells, the calibration curve was established by plotting the peak area at 310 nm for various MDA-DNPH adduct concentrations obtained from MDA standard TEP (Fig. 3B, insert). Figure 3C shows that the concentration of MDA-DNPH adduct formed in heated Chlamydomonas cells is in the concentration range of several units of nanomoles.

Figure 3. Detection of malondialdehyde by HPLC analysis in Chlamydomonas cells.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

The chromatogram of MDA-DNPH adduct in Chlamydomonas cells (A); MDA-DNPH adduct from standard TEP (B) and determination of MDA-DNPH adduct concentrations under heat stress (C). In A, chromatogram of MDA-DNPH adduct is shown in control (0 min) and heated (30 min) Chlamydomonas cells. Representative chromatograms were obtained as average of 3 chromatograms. In (B) chromatogram of MDA-DNPH adduct from MDA standard with a retention time of 2.75 min. The insert shows the dependence of average peak area (n = 5, ±SD) on the concentration of MDA-DNPH adduct from MDA standard TEP. In (C) the concentrations of MDA-DNPH adduct established from calibration curve (y = 16714x–577.99) were as following: 1.03 ± 0.04 nmol (0 min), 1.36 ± 0.12 nmol (10 min), 2.03 ± 0.48 nmol (20 min) and 3.02 ± 0.04 nmol (30 min), (n = 3, ±SD). The coefficient of determination R2 was determined as 0.995.

Detection of triplet excited carbonyl using ultra-weak photon emission

To monitor the formation of 3L = O* during lipid peroxidation, two-dimensional ultra-weak photon emission was measured in the Chlamydomonas cell using a highly sensitive charge coupled device (CCD) camera. Figure 4 shows the effect of heat treatment on the ultra-weak photon emission measured with accumulation time of 10, 20 and 30 min in the Chlamydomonas cells treated at 40 °C for 10, 20 and 30 min. When the cells were treated at 40 °C for a different time interval, photon emission was enhanced in proportion to the heat treatment period. To quantify ultra-weak photon emission from the cells, one-dimensional ultra-weak photon emission was measured using a low-noise PMT. Figure 5A shows that the photon emission in heated cells was found to be highest after 30 min, while the lowest photon emission was observed in cells without heat treatment. The photon emission in heated Chlamydomonas cells was found to be approximately enhanced by 30%, 40% and 50% in 10, 20 and 30 min of heat treatment, respectively compared to non-heated Chlamydomonas cells (Fig. 5B). These results indicates that exposure of Chlamydomonas cells to 40 °C results in the formation of 3L = O*.

Figure 4. Two-dimensional imaging of ultra-weak photon emission from Chlamydomonas cells.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Two-dimensional imaging of the spontaneous and induced ultra-weak photon emission from the Chlamydomonas cells was measured using highly sensitive CCD camera. The images and photographs of ultra-weak photon emission from the heated Chlamydomonas cells at 40 °C for 10, 20 and 30 min (X-axis). Ultra-weak photon emission imaging was measured with an accumulation time of 10, 20 and 30 min (Y-axis).

Figure 5. One-dimensional ultra-weak photon emission from Chlamydomonas cells.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

One-dimensional spontaneous and heat-induced ultra-weak photon emission were measured from Chlamydomonas cells using low-noise PMT. In (A) ultra-weak photon emission was measured in spontaneous and in heated Chlamydomonas cells at 40 °C for 0, 10, 20 and 30 min. In (B) mean photon emission intensity were measured in non-heated and heated Chlamydomonas cells. Heat treatment was done at 40 °C for 0, 10, 20 and 30 min. The presented data are expressed as the mean value and the standard deviation of at least three measurements (mean ± SD, n = 3).

Singlet oxygen imaging using confocal laser scanning microscopy

To visualise 1O2 formation in the heated Chlamydomonas cells, 1O2 imaging was performed using the fluorescent probe SOSG as detected by laser confocal scanning microscopy. Figure 6 shows the Nomarski DIC images, the SOSG fluorescence, the chlorophyll fluorescence and the integral distribution of SOSG fluorescence intensity measured in Chlamydomonas cells. Chlamydomonas cells incubated with SOSG at room temperature exhibited very low SOSG fluorescence, whereas cells exposed to 40 °C emitted strong SOSG fluorescence representing 1O2 formation. SOSG fluorescence measured in multiple number of Chlamydomonas cells showed that distribution of 1O2 is not uniform among the cells (Supplementary data 1). The integral distribution of SOSG fluorescence intensity shows that SOSG fluorescence in heated Chlamydomonas cells is enhanced by about 6 times as compared to non-heated Chlamydomonas cells.

Figure 6. Detection of singlet oxygen in Chlamydomonas cells by laser confocal scanning microscopy.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

The formation of 1O2 was measured in non-heated and heated Chlamydomonas cells in the presence and the absence of catechol and caffeic acid using fluorescent probe SOSG. Heated cells were treated for 30 min in a water bath at 40 °C under dark. The images represent from left to right: Nomarski DIC, SOSG fluorescence, chlorophyll fluorescence and integral distribution of SOSG signal intensity (0–4096) in the 12-bit microphotographs.

To localise 1O2 formation in heated Chlamydomonas cells, Nomarski DIC (A), SOSG fluorescence (B) and chlorophyll fluorescence (C) channels were compared for a series of optical sections through samples (Supplementary data 2). The observation that localisation of SOSG fluorescence corresponds to chlorophyll fluorescence reveals that 1O2 is formed predominantly in chloroplasts (Supplementary data 2A). Nomarski DIC images and SOSG fluorescence measured in multiple layers of Chlamydomonas cells show that SOSG fluorescence from the cytoplasm, pyrenoid and vacuoles also partially contributes to the overall SOSG fluorescence, indicating that 1O2 formation in other part of protoplast cannot be completely ruled out (Supplementary data 2B).

The effect of lipoxygenase inhibitors, catechol and caffeic acid on 1O2 was measured in heated Chlamydomonas cells. Figure 6 shows the Nomarski DIC, the SOSG fluorescence and the chlorophyll fluorescence images measured in the presence of catechol and caffeic acid in non-heated and heated Chlamydomonas cells. No significant effect on the SOSG fluorescence in the presence of catechol was observed in non-heated Chlamydomonas cell whereas the SOSG fluorescence was found to be significantly suppressed in the presence of catechol in the heated Chlamydomonas cell. The integral distribution of the SOSG fluorescence intensity measured in heated Chlamydomonas cells shows that the SOSG fluorescence intensity in the presence of catechol was lowered by approximately 60% as compared to the SOSG fluorescence intensity in the absence of catechol. Similarly, the effect of caffeic acid was tested on 1O2 imaging in heated Chlamydomonas cells. In non-heated Chlamydomonas cell, no change in SOSG fluorescence was observed under the effect of caffeic acid while in heated Chlamydomonas cells caffeic acid reduced signal to values of unheated samples as shown by the integral distribution of signal intensity (Fig. 6). These results reveal that inhibition of lipoxygenase by catechol and caffeic acid prevents 1O2 formation.

Quantification of singlet oxygen using EPR spin-trapping spectroscopy

To quantify 1O2 formation in Chlamydomonas cells exposed to 40 °C, 1O2 was measured by EPR spin-trapping spectroscopy. The detection of 1O2 was accomplished using oxidation of lipophilic diamagnetic 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine (TEMP) by 1O2, which yields paramagnetic 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine-1-oxyl (TEMPO) (Fig. 7). In non-heated Chlamydomonas cells, the addition of TEMP shows a negligible TEMPO EPR signal caused by impurity of the spin trap. The treatment of Chlamydomonas cells to a temperature of 40 °C in the presence of TEMP resulted in the formation of the TEMPO EPR signal (Fig. 7A). To establish the concentration of 1O2 formed in heated cells, the calibration curve was obtained using TEMPO as a standard (Fig. 7B, insert). Figure 7B shows that the concentration of 1O2 formed in heated Chlamydomonas cells is in the concentration range of several tens to hundreds of nanomoles.

Figure 7. EPR spin-trapping detection of singlet oxygen formation from Chlamydomonas cells.

Figure 7

Open in a new tab

Detection of 1O2 by EPR spin-trapping spectroscopy in Chlamydomonas cells. EPR spectra were detected after heat treatment for 0, 10, 20 and 30 min at 40 °C in the presence of 50 mM TEMP. In (A) shows time profile of TEMPO EPR spectra. The intensity of EPR signal was determined by measuring the relative height of central peak of the EPR absorption spectrum. Bar represents 2000 r.u. In (B) The presented data are expressed as the mean value and the standard deviation of at least three measurements (mean ± SD, n = 3). In (B) the concentrations of TEMPO was established from calibration curve (equation y = 26.437x + 132.85) were as following: 55.64 ± 3.04 nmol (0 min), 82.49 ± 10.89 nmol (10 min), 126.09 ± 27.28 nmol (20 min) and 173.55 ± 16.39 nmol (30 min). The coefficient of determination R2 was determined as 0.9976. Insert shows calibration curve of FOX assay obtained using H2O2 as substrate.

Discussion

Several pieces of evidence have been provided that indicate that the increase in temperature is associated with lipid peroxidation33,34,39,40. In agreement with this evidence, we showed that the exposure of Chlamydomonas cells to 40 °C leads to the formation of LOOH (Fig. 1). The observation that lipoxygenase inhibitors (catechol and caffeic acid) significantly suppressed LOOH formation reveals that lipid peroxidation is initiated by lipoxygenase (Fig. 1). Quantification of LOOH formation using FOX assay showed that LOOH was formed in the concentration range of several units in micromoles (Fig. 2). In the propagation phase, the lipid peroxidation process propagates via the formation of LOOH formed upon reaction of LOO∙ with another lipid molecule. In termination, the cyclisation of LOO∙ is known to form cyclic endoperoxide, the decomposition of which leads to the formation of MDA. Our observation that the MDA-DNPH adduct detected by HPLC (Fig. 3) was enhanced in heated Chlamydomonas cells compared to non-heated cells reveals a higher degree of lipid peroxidation under heat stress.

Alternatively, the cyclisation of LOO• is known to form cyclic dioxetane or the recombination of LOO• forms linear tetroxide18,20,21. The decomposition of dioxetane or tetroxide results in the formation of 3L = O*16,17. Our recent results on the spectral analysis of linoleic acid induced ultra-weak photon emission from Chlamydomonas cells using band pass filters showed that the photon emission is in red region of the visible spectrum (> 600 nm), with a photon emission maximum at 680 nm indicating that the photon emission is predominantly from singlet excited chlorophylls. The photon emission in the blue-green region of the spectrum from 3L = O* is quite negligible because the energy transfer from 3L = O* to chlorophyll is more efficient than the photon emission. As singlet excited chlorophylls are formed solely by excitation energy transfer from 3L = O* to chlorophylls21, ultra-weak photon emission might serve as an indirect indicator of 3L = O* formation. In agreement with our observations, it has been previously demonstrated that exposure of spinach leaves and isolated chloroplasts to heat stress is accompanied by the photon emission from singlet excited chlorophyll41. The authors showed that photon emission is dominant in the wavelength range from 700–800 nm under heat treatment. The photon emission from both the samples was found to increase with the increase in temperature from 0 to 40 °C. The slow increase in photon emission in the temperature range of 0–25 °C can be because of initiation of metabolic processes; however, a steep rise in the temperature range of 25–45 °C can be related to the high activity of lipoxygenase present in leaves and isolated chloroplasts. Based on these considerations, the enhancement in ultra-weak photon emission observed in Chlamydomonas cells exposed to heat stress (Figs 4 and 5) indicates that 3L = O* are formed in the heated Chlamydomonas cells during lipid peroxidation likely initiated by lipoxygenase.

The triplet-singlet excitation energy transfer from 3L = O* to molecular oxygen leads to the formation of 1O2. Alternatively, 1O2 is formed directly by decomposition of tetroxide to 1O2 via the Russell reaction10,18,21. Due to elimination of LOO• by the antioxidant system in Chlamydomonas cells, the probability of recombination of two LOO• is significantly low. Under these circumstances, 1O2 formation via decomposition of LOOOOL via the Russell reaction is less expected11,42,43. Based on these considerations, it seems to be likely that cyclisation of LOO• to LOOL and its subsequent decomposition to 3L = O* is the probable reaction pathway for 1O2 formation. EPR spin-trapping spectroscopy showed that exposure of Chlamydomonas cells to 40 °C results in the formation of 1O2 (Fig. 7A). The observation that 1O2 formation linearly increases up to 30 min of heat treatment indicates continuous 1O2 formation with increase in duration of heat treatment (Fig. 7B). The imaging of 1O2 using the green fluorescence of SOSG detected by confocal laser scanning microscopy confirmed that exposure of Chlamydomonas cells to 40 °C results in the formation of 1O2 (Fig. 6). Based on the results obtained using green fluorescence of SOSG and chlorophyll fluorescence, it is evident that 1O2 formation occurs predominantly within chloroplast (Supplementary data 1); however, the contribution of other parts of a cell protoplast are very probable to contribute to the 1O2 pool in the heated Chlamydomonas cells (Supplementary data 2). The observation that inhibition of lipoxygenase by catechol partially prevented 1O2 formation indicates that the lipid peroxidation that leads to 1O2 formation is initiated by lipoxygenase (Fig. 6).

Differences in the localisation of LOOH (Fig. 1) and the 1O2 (Fig. 6 and Supplementary data 2) suggest that formation of both LOOH and 1O2 is localised predominantly in chloroplasts. Contrary to LOOH, 1O2 formation was also observed in pyrenoid, cytoplasm and vacuoles likely due to the short-distance diffusion of 1O2 from the site of its formation. These results provide experimental support for the correlation of lipid peroxidation and 1O2 formation.

Methods

Chlamydomonas reinhardtii growth conditions

Algae strain, Chlamydomonas reinhardtii (wild type: CC-002) was obtained from the Chlamydomonas Genetic Center (Duke University, Durham, NC, USA). The cells were cultivated in Tris-Acetate-Phosphate (TAP) medium in a continuous white light (100 μmol photons m−2 s−1) in Algaetron AG 230 (Photon Systems Instruments, Drásov, Czech Republic). The growth was achieved under permanently stirred condition using shaker (Orbital Shaker PSU-10i, Biosan, Riga, Latvia) to obtain constant CO2 concentration in the growing medium. The cells were studied at a density of approximately 7×107 cells ml−1 during the stationary growth phase. The cell density was determined by an automated cell counter (TC20 Automated Cell Counter, BioRad, Hercules, CA, U.S.A.).

Heat treatment

The lipid peroxidation in Chlamydomonas cells were induced using heat stress. The cell were exposed solely to heat stress and any effect of light was prevented. Samples were treated for 10, 20 and 30 min at temperature of 40 °C using in a water bath (Julabo GmbH, Germany) in Eppendorf tubes.

Confocal laser scanning microscopy

In-vivo imaging of LOOH and 1O2 was based on their reaction with a swallow-tailed perylene derivative (Spy-LHP) (Dojindo Molecular Technologies Inc. Rockville, MD, USA) and SOSG (Molecular Probes Inc., Eugene, OR, USA), respectively. Chlamydomonas cells were incubated either in the presence of 20 μM Spy-LHP or 50 μM SOSG in darkness for 30 min. To study an influence of temperature stress, samples were kept at room temperature or subjected to 40 °C. Immediately after staining, the cells were transferred to a fresh TAP medium and visualized by confocal laser scanning microscopy (Fluorview 1000 unit attached to IX80 microscope; Olympus Czech Group, Prague, Czech Republic). The excitation of both fluorochromes were achieved by a 488 nm line of an argon laser and signal was detected either by a 505–550 nm emission filter for LOOH or by a 505–525 nm emission filter for 1O2. Chlorophyll fluorescence from chloroplasts of Chlamydomonas cells was achieved by excitation with 543 nm helium-neon laser, and emission recorded with a 655–755 nm band filter. Cell morphology was visualized by transmitted light detection module with 405 nm excitation using a near ultraviolet (405 nm) diode laser and Nomarski DIC filters. The proper intensity of all lasers was set according to unstained samples at the beginning of each experiment (Sedlářová et al. 2011)44. Integral distribution of signal intensity (0–4096) in 12-bit microphotographs was evaluated by image analysis software FV10-ASW Viewer (Olympus).

High performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)

Malondialdehyde, a product of lipid or protein oxidation was measured using HPLC. The isolation and derivatization of MDA using 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine (DNPH) was performed as described in Pilz et al. (2000) with some modifications45. After heat treatment, cells were centrifuged at 2000 x g for 10 min and the supernatant was removed. The pellet was resuspended in 200 μl of phosphate buffer saline (PBS, pH  =  7.5) and 100 μl 0.06% butylhydroxytoluene (BHT) dissolved in methanol. Using a sonicator for 90 s (Sonicator, Ultrasonic homogenizer Model 3000, Biologics Inc., Manassas, VA, U.S.A.), the Chlamydomonas cells were disrupted. This step was followed by centrifugation at 2000 x g for 10 min and 125 μl of supernatant was taken for following step. To achieve alkaline hydrolysis of protein bound MDA, 25 μl of 6 M aqueous sodium hydroxide was added to the samples and sample were treated in a 60 °C dry bath for 30 min (Thermo-Shaker TS100, Biosan, Riga, Latvia). To reach the precipitation of proteins in samples, 62.5 μl of 35% (v/v) perchloric acid was added to the sample, vortexed and centrifuged at 16000 x g for 10 min. 125 μl of supernatant was taken into a vial and resuspended in 1 μl of 50 mM DNPH dissolved in 50% sulphuric acid and treated in dark at room temperature for 30 min. DNPH bound to MDA to create a MDA-DNPH adduct. An amount of 25 μl was injected into the HPLC system (Alliance e 2695 HPLC System, Waters, Milford, MA, U.S.A.) and detected at 310 nm using UV/VIS detector. A Symmetry C18 (3.5 μm; 4.6 × 75 mm) Column (Waters, Milford, MA, U.S.A.) was used. The analysis was performed isocratically (1 ml/min at 35 °C) using mobile phase comprised of mixture of 25 mM trimethylamine (pH 3.5) and acetonitrile in the ratio 50:50 (v:v). To remove impurities from the column after every measurement, the column was rinsed by 100% methanol.

Ferrous oxidation-xylenol orange assay

For the quantification of LOOH in Chlamydomonas cells, FOX assay (John M. DeLong et al. 2002) was used with minor modifications. FOX reagent was prepared by mixing 50 mM xylenol orange and 5 mM iron(II) sulfate heptahydrate in proportion 1:1. For the measurement 100 μl of sample (reference) and 2000 μl FOX reagent was used. FOX reagent was added to Chlamydomonas cells prior to heat treatment and absorption changes were measured 30 min after start of heat treatment to keep the total period constant. Hydroperoxide formation was monitored by following the absorbance changes at 560 nm using Olis RSM 1000 spectrometer (Olis Inc., Bogart, Georgia, USA).

Ultra-weak photon emission measurement

Chlamydomonas cells in TAP medium (total volume of 2 ml) in a glass Petri dish (3 cm diameter) were used for ultra-weak photon emission measurements. For two-dimensional photon emission imaging, the photons were reflected by a mirror to the CCD camera positioned horizontally. For one-dimensional photon counting, the Petri dish was placed below the vertically positioned photomultiplier tube (PMT) at a distance of 3 cm. The cells were dark-adapted for 30 min to eliminate any interference by delayed luminescence.

Highly sensitive CCD camera VersArray 1300B (Princeton instruments, Trenton, NJ, USA) with spectral sensitivity in the range of 200–1000 nm restricted to 350–1000 nm due to the objective lens mounted and almost 30% quantum efficiency in the visible range of the spectrum was used for two-dimensional photon imaging. For reduction of dark current, CCD camera was cooled down to −104 °C using a liquid-nitrogen cooling system. The data correction was made by subtracting the background noise before every measurement. The measurement was done in the image format of 1340 × 1300 pixels with following CCD camera parameters: scan rate, 100 kHz; gain, 3; accumulation time, 30 min.

One-dimensional photon counting was done using low-noise photon counting unit C9744 (Hamamatsu Photonics K.K., Iwata city, Japan) with a spectral sensitivity in the range of 160–710 nm. For reduction of thermal electrons, PMT was cooled down to −30 °C using thermoelectric cooler C9143 (Hamamatsu Photonics, K.K., Iwata city, Japan). The PMT was kept vertically to minimize the dark counts to ~2 counts s−1 at −1150 mV. The photon emission measurements were done in the experimental darkroom (3 m × 1.5 m × 2.5 m) painted with black colour. The door in the experimental darkroom was protected completely with a black curtain to restrict any diffusion of light from external source.

Electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy

EPR spin-trapping spectroscopy was used to measure the 1O2 production. Chlamydomonas cells suspended in TAP media with 50 mM TEMP spin trap were heated at 40 °C and EPR spectra were recorded using an EPR spectrometer MiniScope MS400 (Magnettech GmbH, Berlin, Germany). To eliminate impurity TEMPO EPR signal, TEMP was purified twice by vacuum distillation. EPR conditions are as follows: microwave power, 10 mW; modulation amplitude, 1 G; modulation frequency, 100 kHz; sweep width, 100 G; scan rate, 1.62 G s−1.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Prasad, A. et al. Singlet oxygen production in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii under heat stress. Sci. Rep. 6, 20094; doi: 10.1038/srep20094 (2016).

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Information
srep20094-s1.pdf (360.8KB, pdf)

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic through grant no. LO1204 (Sustainable development of research in the Centre of the Region Haná from the National Program of Sustainability I), Internal Grant of Palacký University (PrF-2016-001) and the Grant Agency of the Czech Republic grant no. GP13-29294S. We thank to Marek Rác for his experimental support and stimulating discussion.

Footnotes

Author Contributions A.P. and P.P. contributed to the conception and design of the work, interpretation of data, analysis, and drafted the manuscript. A.P., U.F. and M.S. performed the measurements. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript.

References

  1. Halliwell B. & Gutteridge J. In Free radicals in biology and medicine (2nd Eds.) (Oxford University Press, 2007). [Google Scholar]
  2. Farmer E. & Mueller M. ROS-Mediated Lipid Peroxidation and RES-Activated Signaling. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 64, 429–450 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Gutteridge J. Lipid peroxidation initiated by superoxide-dependent hydroxyl radicals using complexed iron and hydrogen peroxide. FEBS Lett. 172, 245–249 (1984). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Garry B.R. Molecular targets of photosensitization–some biological chemistry of singlet oxygen, In: Free radical and Radiation Biology & ESR Facility, Med labs B180, The University of Iowa, Iowa City (2008) http://www.photobiology.info/Buettner.html. (Accessed: 1st November 2015). [Google Scholar]
  5. Kruft B. & Greer A. Photosensitization Reactions In Vitro and In Vivo. Photochem. Photobiol. 87, 1204–1213 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kanofsky J. Measurement of Singlet-Oxygen In Vivo: Progress and Pitfalls. Photochem. Photobiol. 87, 14–17 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Girotti A. W. Lipid hydroperoxide generation, turnover, and effector action in biological System. J. Lipid Res. 39, 1529–42 (1998). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cilento G. & Waldemar A. From Free Radicals to Electronically Excited Species. Free Rad. Biol. Med. 19, 103–14 (1995). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cilento G. & Waldemar A. Photochemistry and photobiology without light. Photochem. Photobiol. 48, 361–68 (1988). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Miyamoto S. et al. Biological hydroperoxides and singlet molecular oxygen generation. TBMB IUBMB Life 59, 322–331 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Miyamoto S., Martinez G. R., Medeiros M. H. G. & Di Mascio P. Singlet molecular oxygen generated from lipid hydroperoxide by the Russell mechanism: studies using 18O-labeled linoleic acid hydroperoxide and monomol light emission measurements. J Am. Chem. Soc. 125, 6172–6179 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Miyamoto S., Martinez G. R., Martins A. P. B., Medeiros M. G. G. & Di Mascio D. Direct Evidence of Singlet Molecular Oxygen [O2(1ΔG)] Production in the Reaction of Linoleic Acid Hydroperoxide with Peroxynitrite. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125, 4510–517 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Mano N., Mao F. & Heller A. Characteristics of a Miniature Compartment-less Glucose−O 2 Biofuel Cell and Its Operation in a Living Plant. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125, 6588–594 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Miyamoto S. et al. Linoleic Acid Hydroperoxide Reacts with Hypochlorous Acid, Generating Peroxyl Radical Intermediates and Singlet Molecular Oxygen. PNAS 103. 2, 293–98 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Adam W., Kazakov D. V. & Kazakov V. P. Singlet-Oxygen Chemiluminescence in Peroxide Reactions. Chem. Rev. 105, 3371–387 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Cilento G. & Adam W. From free radicals to electronically excited species. Free Radical Bio. Med 19, 103–114 (1995). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Cilento G. & Nascimento A. Generation of electronically excited triplet species at the cellular level: A potential source of genotoxicity. Toxicology Lett. 67, 17–28 (1993). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Miyamoto S., Martinez G., Medeiros M. & Mascio P. Singlet molecular oxygen generated by biological hydroperoxides. J Photochem. Photobiol. B: Biology 139, 24–33 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Brivida K., Saha-Moller C. R., Adam W. & Sies H. Formation of singlet oxygen in the thermal decomposition of 3-hydroxymethyl-3,4,4-trimethyl-1-,2-dioxetane, a chemical source of triplet excited ketones. Biochem. Mol. Biol. Int. 38, 647–651 (1996). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Havaux M., Triantaphylides C. & Genty B. Autoluminescence Imaging: A Non-invasive Tool for Mapping Oxidative Stress.Trends Plant Sci. 11, 480–84 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Pospíšil P. The role of metals in production and scavenging of reactive oxygen species in Photosystem II. Plant and Cell Physiol. 55, 1224–1232 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Cilento G., De Baptista R. C. & Brunetti I. L. Triplet Carbonyls: From Photophysics to Biochemistry. J. Mol. Struct. 324, 45–48 (1994). [Google Scholar]
  23. Cilento G. “Electronic Excitation in Dark Biological Processes” in Chemical and Biological Generation of Excited States Ch. 9, 277–307 (Academic press, 1982). [Google Scholar]
  24. Mano C. M. et al. Excited Singlet Molecular O2 (1Δg) Is Generated Enzymatically from Excited Carbonyls in the Dark. Sci. Rep. 4 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Frankel E. N. Photooxidation in unsaturated fats in Lipid oxidation 2nd edn Ch. 3, 51–66 (Oily Press, 2005). [Google Scholar]
  26. Liu X. & Huang B. Heat Stress Injury in Relation to Membrane Lipid Peroxidation in Creeping Bentgrass. Crop Sci. 40, 503–510 (2000). [Google Scholar]
  27. Larkindale J. & Knight M. R. Protection against Heat Stress-Induced Oxidative Damage in Arabidopsis Involves Calcium, Abscisic Acid, Ethylene, and Salicylic Acid. Plant Physiol. 128, 682–95 (2002). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Kipp E. & Boyle M. The Effects of Heat Stress on Reactive Oxygen Species Production and Chlorophyll Concentration in Arabidopsis Thaliana. Research in Plant Sciences 2, 20–23 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  29. Allakhverdiev S. et al. Heat stress: An overview of molecular responses in photosynthesis. Photosynth. Res. 98, 541–550 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Murata N. & Los D. A. Membrane fluidity and temperature perception. Plant Physiol. 115, 875–879 (1997). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Yamashita A. et al. Quality Control of Photosystem II: Reactive oxygen species are responsible for the damage to photosystem ii under moderate heat stress. J Biol. Chem. 283, 28380–28391 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Mishra R. & Singhal G. Function of Photosynthetic Apparatus of Intact Wheat Leaves under High Light and Heat Stress and Its Relationship with Peroxidation of Thylakoid Lipids. Plant Physiol. 98, 1–6 (1992). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. El-Shitinawy F., Ebrahim M. K. H., Sewelam N. & El-Shourbagy M. N. Activity of photosystem 2, lipid peroxidation, and the enzymatic antioxidant protective system in heat shocked barley seedlings. Photosynthetica 42, 15–21 (2004). [Google Scholar]
  34. Hasanuzzaman M., Nahar K., Alam M., Roychowdhury R. & Fujita M. Physiological, Biochemical, and Molecular Mechanisms of Heat Stress Tolerance in Plants. IJMS International Journal of Molecular Sciences 14, 9643–9684 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Pospíšil P., Šnyrychová I. & Nauš J. Dark production of reactive oxygen species in photosystem II membrane particles at elevated temperature–EPR spin-trapping study. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1767, 854–859 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Hideg É. & Vass I. The 75 °C Thermoluminescence Band of Green Tissues: Chemiluminescence From Membrane-Chlorophyll Interaction. Photochem. Photobiol. 58, 280–283 (1993). [Google Scholar]
  37. Koshihara Y. et al. Caffeic acid is a selective inhibitor for leukotriene biosynthesis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 792, 92–97 (1984). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Sud’ina G. F. et al. Caffeic acid phenethyl ester as a lipoxygenase inhibitor with antioxidant properties. Feder. Eur. Biochem. Soc. 329, 21–24 (1993). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Ali M., Hahn E. & Paek K. Effects of temperature on oxidative stress defense systems, lipid peroxidation and lipoxygenase activity in Phalaenopsis. Plant Physiol. Bioch. 43, 213–223 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Chan T. et al. Quality Control of Photosystem II: Lipid Peroxidation Accelerates Photoinhibition under Excessive Illumination. PLoS One 7, 12 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Hideg È. & Inaba H. Biophoton Emission (Ultraweak Photoemission) From Dark Adapted Spinach Chloroplasts. Photochem. Photobiol. 53, 137–142 (1991). [Google Scholar]
  42. Russell G. A. Deuterium-isotope effects in the autoxidation of aralkyl hydrocarbons – mechanism of the interaction of peroxy radicals. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 79, 3871–3877 (1957). [Google Scholar]
  43. Howard J. A. & Ingold K. U. Self reaction of sec-butylperoxy radicals. Confirmation of Russell mechanism. J Am. Chem. Soc. 90, 1056–1058 (1968). [Google Scholar]
  44. Sedlářová M. et al. Influence of Nitric Oxide and Reactive Oxygen Species on Development of Lettuce Downy Mildew in Lactuca Spp. Eur. J Plant Pathol. 129, 267–280 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  45. Pilz J. Meineke I. & Gleiter C. H. Measurement of free and bound malondialdehyde in plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography as the 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine derivative. J Chromatogr. B 742, 315–325 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information
srep20094-s1.pdf (360.8KB, pdf)

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES