Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Pathology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Pathology
. 1975 Oct;28(10):788–792. doi: 10.1136/jcp.28.10.788

An evaluation of two methods of bacteriocine typing of organisms of the genus Proteus.

I J Al-Jumaili
PMCID: PMC475861  PMID: 1214011

Abstract

An assessment of two simple methods of typing Proteus isolates using bacteriocines is described. The methods chosen were those of Cradock-Watson and Al-Jumaili. It has been shown that the use of liquid bacteriocine preparations is more satisfactory than methods involving proteocine production in solid media. For example, no non-typable isolates were encountered and a large number of strains were demonstrated. This method is therefore proposed for use in a routine diagnostic laboratory.

Full text

PDF
788

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Al-Jumaili I. J. Bacteriocine typing of Proteus. J Clin Pathol. 1975 Oct;28(10):784–787. doi: 10.1136/jcp.28.10.784. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Burke J. P., Adler J. L., Finland M. Comparison of methods for typing Proteus mirabilis as applied in an epidemiological study of infections in a nursery for newborns. Antimicrob Agents Chemother (Bethesda) 1970;10:328–331. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. De Louvois J. Serotyping and the Dienes reaction on Proteus mirabilis from hospital infections. J Clin Pathol. 1969 May;22(3):263–268. doi: 10.1136/jcp.22.3.263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Kashbur I. M., George R. H., Ayliffe G. A. Resistotyping of Proteus mirabilis and a comparison with other methods of typing. J Clin Pathol. 1974 Jul;27(7):572–577. doi: 10.1136/jcp.27.7.572. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Pathology are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES