Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2016 Feb 19;6:21153. doi: 10.1038/srep21153

Acute ecotoxicology of natural oil and gas condensate to coral reef larvae

Andrew P Negri 1,a, Diane L Brinkman 1, Florita Flores 1, Emmanuelle S Botté 1, Ross J Jones 1, Nicole S Webster 1
PMCID: PMC4759697  PMID: 26892387

Abstract

Risks posed by oil spills to coral reefs are difficult to evaluate, partially due to the absence of studies that adequately assess toxicity to relevant coral reef species. Here we experimentally tested the acute toxicity of condensate, representing a fraction of light crude oil, to coral (Acropora tenuis) and sponge (Rhopaloeides odorabile) larvae. The metamorphosis of coral larvae was inhibited at total petroleum aromatic hydrocarbon (TPAH) concentrations of water accommodated fractions (WAF) as low as 103 μg l−1, similar to concentrations detected in seawater following large spills. The sensitivity of coral larvae increased by 40% when co-exposed to UV light that they might encounter in shallow reefal systems. Condensate WAF was more toxic to coral larvae than predicted by summing the toxicity of its main components (benzene, toluene, p-xylene and napthalene). In contrast, the sensitivity of sponge larvae to condensate WAF (>10,000 μg l−1 TPAH) was far less than coral in the presence and absence of UV, but similar to that of other marine invertebrates. While these results highlight the relative sensitivity of coral larvae to oil, further research is needed to better understand and predict the impacts and risks posed by hydrocarbons to tropical reef systems.


Renewed interest in the effects of hydrocarbon spills on sensitive marine and coastal ecosystems was stimulated by two high profile oil spills (‘blowouts’), the Montara well-head platform incident off north west Australia1 in 2009, and shortly afterwards, the 2010 Macondo (Deepwater Horizon) incident in the Gulf of Mexico2,3. The Montara incident released ~4,500 m3 of medium crude oil1,4,5 into a unique marine biogeographic province, containing biodiversity hotspots such as carbonate reefs, banks and shoals that are spatially related (perhaps causally related) with active and palaeo-hydrocarbon seeps6,7. The submerged banks and shoals formed by the green alga Halimeda spp. and other coralline algae8 are particularly abundant in the Timor Sea and their sunlight exposed summit regions are dominated by photoautotrophic scleractinian corals, octocorals, green algae and seagrass4, with the deeper (>25–30 m) flanks dominated by filter and particulate feeders including sponges, soft corals and bryozoans4. The much larger Deepwater Horizon event released ~780,000 m3 of light crude oil, with sub-surface plumes reportedly affecting deep benthic communities, including cold-water coral populations9,10.

Tropical coral reefs are in decline and additional impacts from human activities, including hydrocarbon pollution, place these ecosystems at further risk11. In addition to blowouts, coral reefs can be exposed to hydrocarbons from shipping accidents12,13 and spills from coastal processing facilities. One of the largest documented oil spills into shallow tropical reef environments (the Galeta spill, 1968) involved the release of ~10,000 m3 of medium crude oil from refinery storage into the nearshore waters of the Caribbean coast of Panama14. This spill had extensive effects on mangroves, seagrasses and corals14, with very little evidence of recovery of coral reefs observed five years later15.

Among the most vulnerable tropical organisms to oil are the sessile benthic invertebrates which cannot actively avoid exposure. The effects of hydrocarbons on corals is of particular importance as they are the principal habitat-forming species on reefs, and there have been several laboratory- and field-based studies describing the lethal and sub-lethal effects of exposure12,16,17,18. For other important taxa such as marine sponges19, which are the primary filter-feeding taxa on reefs and act as a critical link between benthic and pelagic habitats, there have been fewer studies. Also, very little is known about the effects of hydrocarbons on early life history stages of reef invertebrates. These stages are particularly important as successful recruitment underpins recovery and resilience of reefs following disturbance20,21. Pioneering field studies in the Red Sea described significant decreases in the reproductive output of corals and settlement and metamorphosis of pelagic coral larvae at a site chronically contaminated with crude oil22,23. These early observations have been complemented by ~12 laboratory studies investigating effects of hydrocarbons (gasoline, condensate, fuel oil, crude oil and lubricants) on various life stages of coral (including early release of larvae, fertilization, embryo development, larval survival and metamorphosis and juvenile growth, summarised in Table 1). Some of the laboratory studies indicated early life stages of coral may be sensitive to petroleum hydrocarbons, but effect threshold concentrations ranged by over three orders of magnitude between studies, species and life stages. The only equivalent study on sponges was with the encrusting sponge, Crambe crambe, and indicated larvae were possibly more sensitive to hydrocarbons than most coral larvae (Table 1).

Table 1. Summary of laboratory-based studies testing hydrocarbon toxicity to reproduction and early life stages of corals and a sponge.

Species Hydrocarbon Endpoint WAF Chemistry Effect concentration (WAF% or μg l−1) Ref.
Coral
 Stylophora pistillata Crude oil Mortality, metamorphosis No LOEC Survival: 1% LOEC Meta: 1% 23
 Pocillopora damicornis Unleaded gasoline:engine oil (50:1) and benzene Mortality, metamorphosis No Not consistently observed 55
 Acropora tenuis Fuel oil 467 Fertilization THC LOEC Fert: 2 56
 Acropora millepora Heavy crude oil Fertilization, metamorphosis THC LOEC Fert: 165 LOEC Meta: 82 31
 A. millepora Produced formation water Fertilization, metamorphosis THC LOEC Fert: 72 LOEC Meta: 36 31
 S. pistillata crude oil Metamorphosis, morphology No LOEC Meta: 0.1%, LOEC Deform.: 1% WAF 57
 A. tenuis Fuel oil 467 Larval survival THC LC50 3800 32
 Goniastrea aspera       LOEC 6800  
 Platygyra sinensis       No observed effect  
 A. microphthalma Marine lubricants Fertilization THC LOEC: 200 34
 P.damicornis Natural gas condensate Larval mortality, Metamorphosis, Juvenile growth No Mortality: > 100% Growth: > 100% 58
 Pocillopora verrucosa       Mort: > 100%, LOEC Meta: 100%, Growth: 100%  
 Seriatopora hystrix       Mort.: 100% LOEC Meta: 50% Growth: 100%  
 S.guttatus       Mort.: 100%, LOEC Meta: 50%, Growth: 10%  
 S. pistillata       Mort.:0 > 100%, LOEC Meta: 100%, Growth: 10%  
 P. damicornis Natural gas condensate Larval abortion (early release) No Abortion: 50% 59
 Montastraea faveolata Light crude oil Metamorphosis, swimming, & mortality THC LOEC Mort: 650 LOEC Meta: 650 30
 Porites astreoides   Larval mortality   LOEC Survival: 620 LOEC Meta: 620  
 Agaricia humilis Seawater from a light crude spill and Lab WAF Larval mortality, metamorphosis THC Mortality: 550 Meta: 145 60
 Orbicella faveolata       Mortality: 135  
        Meta: 135  
Sponge
 Crambe crambe PAH mix Larval metamorphosis No LOEC Meta: 0.5 35

Where LOEC = lowest observed effect concentration, WAF = water accommodated fraction, Met. = metamorphosis, Fert. = fertilization, Deform. = deformation, Mort = mortality. LC50 is the lethal concentration for 50% mortality. THC = total hydrocarbons.

In order to predict risk to marine species from oil spills and blowouts it is necessary to understand both the potential exposure and likely effects amongst a range of different organisms. The wide range of sensitivities of early life stages of corals and sponges to hydrocarbons in Table 1 could be due to differences in the type of oil and the experimental conditions, including exposure duration. The variance could also be due to differences in the life history stages used and also to intrinsic differences in the sensitivity of different species or taxa. This latter source of variation is particularly important for the derivation of environmental quality criteria and for risk assessment purposes, as it is the basis of species sensitivity distribution (SSD) analyses (i.e. probability distribution of some measure of toxicity to a certain chemical in a population)24. Comparison of hydrocarbon exposure studies is not always possible, as concentrations are typically expressed in terms of water accommodated fraction concentration (% WAF) or total hydrocarbons (THC), which can vary in composition depending on the hydrocarbon source and the protocol used for WAF preparation25. The exposure of coral reef organisms to hydrocarbons following uncontrolled releases has not been reliably reported, but comprehensive water column measurements made during the Deepwater Horizon spill provide a suitable reference point for likely concentrations in sub-surface slicks. The spill released a wide range of petroleum hydrocarbons (gas and oil), including n-alkanes, branched alkanes, monoaromatic hydrocarbons (MAHs) and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs)26. Sub-surface total PAHs (ΣPAH41) reached 189 μg l−1 (~1,300 m deep and <5 km from the platform)27, while total benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylenes (collectively referred to as BTEX) reached 78 μg l−1 (in samples collected at ~1200 m deep and 6 km from the well head)26.

Oil and gas exploration and production in north-west Australia faces a unique conservation challenge, which is to balance the commercial value of the underlying hydrocarbon prospects against the potential for accidental releases during exploration and production and potential loss of conservation value of these unique ecosystems. The toxicity of north-western Australia light crude oil has been examined on several temperate species as well as tropical fish, shrimp and urchin larvae28; however, the toxicity to sessile tropical reef invertebrates such as corals and sponges has not yet been described. For tropical ecotoxicology, important environmental variables are water temperature and UV irradiance, which are both higher in low latitude environments. For example, UV irradiance can increase the potency of PAHs through oxygen radical formation and concomitant damage to membranes and DNA29. To improve risk assessments, and to better inform decision-making for oil and gas industry and government for oil spill response, we examined the acute toxicity of North West Shelf condensate to coral and sponge larvae. Condensate (also referred to as natural gasoline or distillate) is the hydrocarbon fraction of a gas or light crude well that remains liquid at room temperature and 1 atmosphere. In addition, we examined the effect of simultaneous exposure to UV light, and the toxicity of the four major aromatic components of the water accommodated fraction of condensate to examine their potential contribution to toxicity.

Results

Condensate and WAF composition

The chemical characteristics of stabilised condensate were typical of a relatively light petroleum product. Analysis of the GC-amenable hydrocarbons revealed that the condensate contained predominately odd and even n-alkanes (most abundant within the n-C5 to n-C10 range), branched alkanes, as well as parent and alkyl-substituted cycloalkanes, benzenes and PAHs (Supplementary Fig. S1). The PAHs were characteristically lower in molecular mass distribution compared to heavier oils and primarily included parent and alkyl naphthalenes, fluorene and phenanthrene (Supplementary Table S1). BTEXs and PAHs constituted 2.8% and 0.6% (w/w) of the condensate, respectively.

Solvent extracts of freshly prepared condensate WAF differed considerably in their hydrocarbon profiles compared to the original condensate. No n-alkanes or branched alkanes were detected in the WAFs, as assessed by extracting the three major ions characteristic of these compounds (m/z 57, 71, 85) from the GC-MS total ion current chromatogram. Instead, the hydrocarbon composition was dominated by BTEXs, other alkyl-substituted benzenes and the naphthalene series (Supplementary Fig. S2). Some losses of more volatile condensate hydrocarbons due to evaporation likely occurred during the mixing period. The remainder of the condensate formed a visible immiscible slick on the seawater surface after settling. The concentration of total BTEXs accommodated within the seawater fractions for the coral and sponge exposures were 12.7 and 27.8 mg l−1, respectively, while total PAH concentrations were 157 and 224 μg l−1, respectively (Supplementary Table S2). Total BTEXs and total PAHs in the coral exposure WAF were 55% and 30% lower than those in the sponge exposure WAF, respectively. Such variations may have resulted from greater losses of the volatile and semi-volatile components during preparation and/or sampling of the coral exposure WAF. A summary of individual BTEX and PAH concentrations in condensate and the freshly prepared WAFs used in the exposure experiments are summarised in Table 2. Over the course of the larval exposure experiments, the headspace in the sealed glass incubation vials (~10%) resulted in 35–55% evaporation of TPAH over 24 h and the average of the initial and final TPAH concentrations were subsequently applied as exposures in concentration-response curves.

Table 2. Concentrations of BTEX and PAHs detected in the water accommodated fractions (WAF) of North West Shelf Condensate and of individual aromatic hydrocarbons used in the current study.

Analyte 100% Condensate WAF (coral) 100% Condensate WAF (sponge) 100% Benzene WAF (coral) 100% Toluene WAF (coral) 100% p-Xylene WAF (coral) 100% Naphthalene WAF (coral)
Initial Final −UV Final + UV Initial Final −UV Final + UV Initial Final Initial Final Initial Final Initial Final
benzene 4,500 4,000 1,100 6,967 6,200 6,100 630,000 465,608            
toluene 6,100 3,900 1,100 17,000 9,300 8,100     140,000 100,000        
ethylbenzene 140 110 29 360 310 290                
m,p-xylene 1,300 830 260 2,867 1,200 2,000         36,000 41,000    
o-xylene 680 460 130 650 590 820                
naphthalene 86 58 72 105 104 98             15,000 NA
C1-naphthalenes 67 49 60 90 76 79                
C2-naphthalenes       29 24 24                
fluorene 1 1                        
phenanthrene 1                          
Total BTEX 12,720 9,300 2,619 27,843 17,600 17,310 630,000 465,608 140,000 100,000 36,000 41,000    
Total PAH 157 107 132 224 203 201             15,000 NA
TPAH 12,877 9,407 2,751 28,067 17,803 17,511 630,000 465,608 140,000 100,000 36,000 41,000 15,000 NA
Mean total aromatics (24 h)   11,142 7,813   22,935 22,789   547,804   120,000   38,500   15,000

All concentrations are in μg l−1. NA = not analysed.

Effects of condensate and UV on coral and sponge larvae

After 24 h in uncontaminated seawater 70–84% of ‘control’ coral larvae underwent successful attachment and metamorphosis in each experiment (Table 3). No difference in metamorphosis success (performance) was observed between control larvae (7–13 days old) over this period (ANOVA F5 = 1.4, p = 0.24). Coral larvae exposed to condensate WAF over 24 h also exhibited normal settlement and metamorphosis behaviour at low concentrations (<100 μg l−1), but this development process became increasingly inhibited at higher condensate concentrations (Fig. 1). Fitting the % inhibition data to a logistic equation allowed calculation of concentrations that inhibited metamorphosis by 10% (IC10) = 103 μg l−1 and 50% (IC50) = 339 μg l−1 TPAH (Table 3). Co-exposing coral larvae to high UV for 2 h under otherwise identical conditions inhibited metamorphosis by 50% at a significantly lower concentration of IC50 = 132 μg l−1 TPAH (p < 0.05, Fig. 2b, Table 3).

Table 3. Concentrations of TPAH (ΣBTEX + ΣPAHs) that inhibit 50% (IC50) and 10% (IC10) metamorphosis of coral and sponge larvae (95% CV intervals) calculated from dose-response curves presented in Figs 1 and 3.

  Coral condensate Sponge condensate Coral
−UV +UV −UV +UV Benzene Toluene Xylene Naphthalene
IC50 339a 132b ~16,000 ~13,000 80,351 15,559 3,939 2,077
  (271–424) (118–148) (NA) (NA) (70,661–91,369) (13,054–18,543) (3423–4532) (1694–2548)
IC10 103 64 NA NA 31,087 8,282 2,160 1,285
  (63–168) (49–84) (NA) (NA) (23,508–41,109) (5,416–12,666) (1,576–2,960) (797–2,070)
R2 0.871 0.943 0.833 0.867 0.920 0.831 0.891 0.733
NOEC 180 63 11,000 11,000 34,000 15,000 4,800 1,900
LOEC 350 130 23,000 23,000 69,000 30,000 9,600 3,800
ANOVA F9 34.6 52.3 26.9 26.9 61.4 33.3 46.4 27.3
Meta. (%) in controls 79 75 82 90 84 70 76 67
(±4) (±5) (±6) (±5) (±4) (±4) (±4) (±4)

Different superscripted letters indicate statistically different IC50 values for condensate toxicity to coral larvae (F1,120 = 29.2, p < 0.0001). Estimates of the IC50s for sponge larval metamorphosis were made from limited data points on the slopes of the curves and IC10s were not calculated for that reason (NA). No significant observed effect concentrations (NOEC) and lowest significant observed effect concentrations (LOEC) are reported (one-way ANOVA, p < 0.05). Meta. = mean metamorphosis of control larvae in uncontaminated conditions ( ± SE).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Photomicrographs of 24 h old juvenile corals showing normal post settlement metamorphosis, showing completion of primary and secondary mesentery formation of a single polyp with six tentacles surrounding a mouth, partial and disrupted metamorphosis when exposed to PAHs and WAF condensate where (a) control, (b), 5,600 μg l−1 TPAH in stabilized condensate WAF and (c) 34,000 μg l−1 benzene WAF.

Figure 2. Concentration-response curves for inhibition of metamorphosis of coral and sponge larvae in the presence of condensate WAF (μg l−1 TPAH).

Figure 2

Closed circles represent mean inhibition (%, relative to control) of coral larval metamorphosis to condensate WAF in the (a) absence of UV and (b) presence of UV and of sponge larval metamorphosis to condensate WAF in the (c) absence of UV and (d) presence of UV. Open circles represent mean abnormalities (%) of larvae in the same treatments. Mean ± SE of six replicate exposures. Summary results from these curves can be found in Table 3.

Coral larvae that did not metamorphose remained intact up to the maximum concentration tested of 11,100 μg l−1 TPAH for 24 h. After the addition of CCA extract to induce metamorphosis and an additional 18 h of development, 54% larvae exposed to ~5,600 μg l−1 TPAH exhibited abnormal development (Fig. 2a), characterised by partial metamorphosis in the water column without attachment (Fig. 1b). Similar abnormal development of polyps in the water column was observed for coral larvae exposed to ≥3,900 μg l−1 TPAH (Fig. 1b). Several of these abnormal floating polyps were isolated and maintained for an additional 48 h in uncontaminated seawater but did not show any attempts to attach and undergo metamorphosis.

After 24 h in treatment conditions in uncontaminated seawater, 82% and 90% of control sponge larvae were able to successfully attach and undergo metamorphosis (Fig. 2c,d, Table 3). Sponge larvae were far less sensitive to condensate WAF over 24 h than corals, and were not affected by condensate WAF until concentrations exceeded 11,000 μg l−1 TPAH (Table 3). Above this concentration larvae appeared either as small spheres or were misshapen, with thin mucoidal strands detaching from the surface. No successful metamorphosis was seen in any of the larvae above 11,000 μg l−1 TPAH (Fig. 2c,d) and co-exposure of sponge larvae to UV had no additional effect on metamorphosis.

Effects of individual MAHs and naphthalene on coral larvae

Four major aromatic components of condensate WAF, benzene, toluene, p-xylene and naphthalene, all individually inhibited settlement and metamorphosis of coral larvae after a 24 h exposure (Fig. 3). Fitting the % inhibition data to a logistic equation enabled calculations of IC50s indicating a relative order of toxicity of: naphthalene >xylene >toluene >benzene (Table 3). In each case abnormal development of polyps (floating and unattached see Fig. 1c) was observed at high concentrations of (1,000–10,000 μg l−1, Fig. 3) and total mortality was observed at higher concentrations.

Figure 3. Concentration-response curves for inhibition of metamorphosis of coral larvae in the presence of the major aromatic components found in condensate WAF (μg l−1).

Figure 3

Closed circles represent mean inhibition (%, relative to control) of coral larval metamorphosis to (a) benzene, (b) toluene, (c) p-xylene and (d) naphthalene. Open circles represent mean abnormalities (%) of larvae in the same treatments. Mean ± SE of six replicate exposures. Summary results from these curves can be found in Table 3.

The measured toxicity of the condensate treatments to coral larvae in the absence and presence of UV was estimated to be 39- and 93-fold more toxic than predicted by summing the contribution towards total toxicity of each measured component. This estimation was made by summing the combined toxicity of the individual components tested, including assumed toxicity of the other major components m + o-xylene ( = p-xylene) and C1-alkylnaphthalenes (=naphthalene) in the WAFs, which resulted in a predicted toxicity for 100% WAF of 0.85 toxic units (TU).

Discussion

The intimate spatial association of coral reefs, banks and shoals in Australia’s NW shelf (Timor Sea) with offshore oil and gas exploration and production presents a number of unique development and conservation challenges. This is the first study to examine the effects of the water accommodated fraction of NW shelf gas condensate on the response of ecologically important, habitat forming corals and sponges. It also represents one of very few studies on coral-hydrocarbon ecotoxicology to incorporate important ecotoxicological principles such as the generation of concentration-response curves (to calculate IC10 and IC50 values) and measured concentrations30, which will allow toxicity to be compared between species, contaminant types and future studies for oil spill risk assessment purposes25.

Coral and sponge larvae exhibited large differences in sensitivity to condensate WAF following short term exposures. Coral larvae were much more sensitive, with the lowest concentration to inhibit metamorphosis (IC10) similar to concentrations measured in sub-surface water after the Deepwater Horizon spill26,27. Sponge larvae were ~50 times less sensitive than coral larvae, but exhibited sensitivities comparable to other tropical/sub-tropical adult species (fish, shrimp), urchin larvae and several temperate species28 exposed to WAF from NW shelf light crude (of similar composition to the WAF condensate tested here).

Comparing the effects of hydrocarbons on corals and sponges between studies is hindered by differences in the composition of the oils tested, the protocols used for WAF preparation, the exposure regimes and experimental durations and differences in the species and life-history stages tested. Comparisons are also challenging because most oil exposure tests with corals and sponges have reported nominal concentrations and the individual components of the oil have not been measured (Table 1). Despite these limitations, some emergent generalizations are that (i) the coral metamorphosis assay described here showed effects at similar concentrations to those previously reported for the effects of crude oil and produced formation water on coral larvae30,31, and (ii) metamorphosis of coral larvae increasingly appears to be one of the more sensitive life stages of coral to hydrocarbon exposure. For example, inhibition of larval metamorphosis in Acropora millepora was twice as sensitive as fertilization to crude oil WAF31, and most IC50s and LOECs reported for metamorphosis inhibition by WAF concentrations (Tables 1 and 3) are an order of magnitude lower than LC50s for coral larval mortality32. Peters and colleagues33 reported that adult corals can survive for 12 weeks at WAF total hydrocarbon concentrations up to 2,800 μg l−1, in contrast to short-term (48 h) exposures to WAFs of commercial lubricants which caused mortality of adult corals at concentrations as low as 190 μg l−1 THC34. Metamorphosis in the sponge C. crambe larvae was inhibited by a PAH mixture at concentrations far lower (0.5 μg l−1) than TPAH concentrations reported here for corals and sponges35. The apparent high sensitivity of C. crambe could be a species-specific response or due to a range of methodological factors including differences in contaminant composition, in particular the more toxic PAH components.

The general mode of hydrocarbon (BTEX and PAH) toxicity to animals is considered to be non-specific narcosis36; however, the high sensitivity detected in the coral larval metamorphosis assay indicates more specific disruption of this key life history transition. The larvae of many coral species, including A. tenuis and A. millepora, will not undergo metamorphosis without an external chemical signal (cue) which is primarily derived from crustose coralline algae37,38. Components of the WAF may affect one of many critical processes from cue recognition to subsequent signal transduction or regulation of genes and biochemistry that control the metamorphosis process. The observation that some larvae underwent partial metamorphosis (changed body plan) without attachment indicates processes earlier in this life cycle transformation were affected39.

Exposure to UV (280–400 nm) light increased the sensitivity of the coral larvae (but not the sponge larvae) to the WAF of condensate by ~43%. UV exposure can aid in the degradation of toxic PAHs (photolysis) but can also considerably enhance PAH toxicity (photoactivation) by oxygen radical formation29. Previous research has indicated a 12–50,000-fold increase in toxicity to marine invertebrates from PAH photo enhancement40. Why the effect was less pronounced for coral larvae is unclear but could be due to a low concentration of PAHs in the tested WAF which was dominated by 2-ringed naphthalenes that exhibit far lower photoactivation than many 3- and 4-ringed PAHs29. BTEX compounds are not thought to be photoactivated by UV29. Clearly UV exposure is another important consideration which needs to be taken into account in future studies examining oil toxicity to tropical organisms in shallow, clear-water environments.

The necrotic toxicity of BTEXs and PAHs can be predicted based on their octanol/water partition coefficient, log Kow (most water soluble benzene = 1.94, toluene = 2.48, p-xylene = 3.05 and least water soluble naphthalene =3.26)36,41. A strong inverse linear correlation was observed between the log Kows of the individual contaminants tested here and their respective IC50s (r2 = 0.83, p = 0.089), indicating similar modes of action and toxicities close to those predicted for narcotic effects28,41. The sensitivity of coral larvae to condensate WAF however, was far greater than that of the major individual components of condensate WAF (IC50s 2,000–80,000 μg l−1, Table 3). This difference between measured and expected condensate toxicities was confirmed by summing the potency × concentration of each of the WAF components and calculating Σi (Ci / IC50,i) = 0.85 TU for the 100% WAF. The condensate WAF was then calculated to inhibit 50% metamorphosis at 0.026 TU, indicating an observed potency ~40-fold greater than predicted (50% inhibition should occur at 1 TU25). Although the narcotic effects of BTEX and PAH components are usually considered additive, non-additive effects including synergism are often observed in developmental stages of organisms42. It is also possible that minor components not detected or reported in the WAF analysis (e.g. trace 3-ringed PAHs or hydrogen sulphide), may have been responsible for disrupting specific developmental processes as discussed above.

The condensate used in this experiment was a partially refined fraction of components that may be found in a light crude oil blowout or spill. The composition and toxicity would be different if unrefined hydrocarbons enter the water from sub-surface blowouts or surface spills, are exposed to weathering processes or if oil spill control agents are used to disperse the hydrocarbons into the water column43. In this study we used 24 h exposures which may not have allowed sufficient time for maximum uptake of toxic components into the small larvae44. However, 24 h is likely to represent a more environmentally relevant exposure duration to the highly volatile aromatics associated with light crude than standardized 48 or 96 h chronic exposures commonly suggested for testing toxicity of early life stages44.

Conclusions

Corals and sponges represent ecologically important, habitat forming tropical reef taxa and adverse effects on reproduction and recruitment via exposure to uncontrolled hydrocarbon releases would have considerable long term consequences for reef maintenance or reef recovery following disturbance. Towards more environmentally relevant testing of WAF of gas condensate from the Australian NW shelf (i.e. using tropical rather than temperate species), we have described effects on larval metamorphosis at environmentally relevant concentrations26,27, shown that toxicity is enhanced following UV exposure and demonstrated that coral larvae are more sensitive to condensate WAF toxicity than sponge larvae. Further testing on a range of relevant tropical taxa using the approach defined here would enable generation of species sensitivity distributions to more comprehensively predict and manage the risks posed by oil spills in tropical reef systems.

Materials and Methods

Stabilized condensate and hydrocarbons

The stabilized condensate was typical of that produced by bringing natural gas hydrocarbons from the Browse Basin of the North West Shelf, Australia to room temperature and atmospheric pressure. Stabilized condensate (also referred to as natural gasoline or distillate) of this type has a similar behaviour and composition to Type I light crude oil (Table S1). Samples were obtained in a sealed steel drum and stored at room temperature until use. The condensate had a density of 0.75 g ml−1 and a viscosity of ~0.65 cP. Benzene, toluene, p-xylene and naphthalene were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich and all had purities ≥99%.

Water accommodated fraction preparation

Water accommodated fractions (WAF) were prepared with fresh condensate, benzene, toluene, p-xylene or naphthalene according to recommendations by45,46. Briefly, 800 ml 0.45 μm-filtered seawater (36 PSU, pH 8.1) was added to a solvent-rinsed I l glass aspirator bottle and mixed using a magnetic stirrer to generate a 20–25% vortex. Condensate or pure aromatics were added to the centre of the vortex at a 1:100 ratio (8 ml) and the aspirator was loosely capped and the fluids mixed for 18 h in darkness. No evidence of emulsion or bubble formation was observed after 10 min settling, so the WAF was allowed to settle for 1 h before immediate water sampling for analysis and application in the toxicity tests. Eight dilutions of the 100% WAF were prepared using the same 0.45 μm-filtered seawater to mimic dilution in the water column47, rather than the variable loading technique of CROSERF which is designed to mimic uptake from surface slicks45. The serial dilution method was chosen to maintain consistent proportions of each component in the ten treatment levels and to enable more treatment levels to be tested for improved concentration-response modelling. The National Research Council considers both approaches valid48.

Hydrocarbon analysis

Hydrocarbon analyses were performed at ChemCentre (Perth, Western Australia). BTEX analyses were based on USEPA method 8260. WAF samples were analysed directly from sealed vials using Purge and Trap (P&T) GC-MS in selective ion monitoring (SIM) mode. Condensate was diluted in dichloromethane (DCM) and analysed by P&T GC-MS in scan mode. Internal standards (chlorobenzene-d5, 2-fluorobenzene, and 1,4-dichlorobenzene-d4) were added by the P&T system immediately before analysis. A method blank and a spiked control (de-ionised water with a known amount of BTEX added) were run with each sample batch. Non-quantitative whole oil analysis was performed using GC-MS directly injected with 1 μL undiluted condensate. A pre-characterised crude oil was used as a reference for hydrocarbon identification.

PAHs were analysed based on USEPA method 8270. WAF samples (500 ml) were extracted three times with DCM, the combined extracts (80 ml) were dried with sodium sulphate and 8 ml aliquots were concentrated to 1 ml under nitrogen gas. The concentrated WAF extracts and condensate (diluted in DCM) were analysed using GC-MS in scan mode. Surrogate standards (2-fluorobiphenyl, nitrobenzene-d5, and p-terphenyl-d14) were added to the WAF samples before extraction, and internal standards (naphthalene-d8, acenaphthene-d10, phenanthrene-d10, chrysene-d12, and perylene-d12) were added to the extracts and diluted condensate before analysis. A method blank and a spiked control (de-ionised water with a known amount of acenaphthene and pyrene) were run with each sample batch.

Coral and sponge collection and larval culture

Colonies of the common Indo-Pacific broadcast spawning coral Acropora tenuis (Dana, 1846) > 20 cm were collected from 3–5 m depth in November 2014 from Trunk Reef, on the central mid-shelf Great Barrier Reef (GBR, 18.329°S, 146.846°E). Gravid colonies were transported to the National Sea Simulator (SeaSim) at AIMS in Townsville and placed in flow-through tanks at ~28 °C until spawning. Gametes were collected from 6 parental colonies, fertilized and the symbiont-free larvae were cultured at less than 500 larvae l−1 in flow through tanks as previously described31. A. millepora larvae reach maximum competency for settlement after six days and remain competent for over a month (reviewed in Jones et al. 201549). Consequently, to ensure consistent settlement and metamorphosis, 7 to 13-day old larvae were used in separate exposure experiments. Rhopaloeides odorabile (Thompson, Murphy, Bergquist & Evans, 1987) is a common, viviparous, gonochoristic, dictyoceratid sponge (Demospongiiae), that broods parenchymellae larvae that are released annually over a 5–6 week period in the summer months on the GBR January50,51. Ten whole female sponges were collected from Davies Reef, central GBR Australia (18.843°S, 147.627°E) on the 11th January 2015 and transported to the SeaSim at AIMS. Sponges were maintained in flow-through aquaria which allowed the controlled collection of larvae over several hours during their afternoon release. The brooded larvae were collected using larval traps, following established methods50. Since R. odorabile larvae reach maximum competency to settle after 1- 2 d52, experimental exposure was conducted with 24 h old larvae.

Settlement assays

Coral and sponge larvae were each exposed to stabilized condensate WAFs, while coral larvae were additionally exposed to WAFs of the pure aromatics. Static exposures were conducted in 7 ml glass vials containing 8–10 coral larvae or 20–30 sponge larvae made up to 6.5 ml with the 10 WAF dilutions (100%, 50%, 25%, 12.5%, 6.25%, 3.125%, 1.6%, 0.8%, 0.4%, 0% WAF) with six replicate vials used for each WAF concentration. Vials were sealed with caps and a ~0.5 ml headspace enabled oxygen exchange (>7.5 mg l−1 over 24 h exposures) and discouraged settlement of larvae, which was often observed in trials with no head-space.

Vials were transferred to an incubator/shaker and incubated under a light level of 40 μmol quanta m−2 s−1 over a 12:12 h L:D cycle, to maintain gentle water movement. Vials were removed after a 24 h exposure and the larvae and WAF from individual vials transferred directly into individual 6-well cell culture plates (12 ml, Nunc, NY, USA). Prior to sponge settlement assays, culture plates were immersed in flow through aquaria for 48 h to develop a microbial biofilm required for successful settlement53. To test the potential UV-activation of PAH toxicity a duplicate series of condensate WAF exposures of coral and sponge larvae were exposed to full sunlight by immersing in a 28 °C water bath for 2 h (UVA + UVB ranged between 4.5 and 6.8 mW cm−2 over this period using a Solartech UV Radiometer).

For coral larvae, settlement and metamorphosis was initiated by the addition of a slightly sub-optimal (to maximise the sensitivity of the assay) concentration (10 μl) of crustose coralline algae extract54 prepared using 4 g of the crustose coralline algae Porolithon onkodes37. Metamorphosis was assessed after 18 h and larvae scored as normal if they had changed from either the free swimming or casually attached pear-shaped forms to squat, firmly attached, disc-shaped structures with pronounced flattening of the oral–aboral axis and with septal mesenteries radiating from the central mouth region37. Metamorphosis of sponges was assessed after 48 h and scored as normal if larvae had firmly attached to the surface and undergone flattening of the body to form a disc-like morphology with the centre showing the remnants of the posterior larval pole50.

Data analysis

Inhibition of metamorphosis (inhibition % relative to 0% WAF control) was calculated from treatment data as Inhibition (%) = 100 × [(% metamorphosiscontrol – %metamorphosistreatment)/% metamorphosiscontrol]. As the larval toxicity is most likely to be due to the BTEX and PAHs25,44, the concentration-response curves were generated with reference to total petroleum aromatic hydrocarbons (TPAH), which in the context of this study, is defined as the sum of total BTEX and PAHs (ΣBTEX + ΣPAHs). The concentration of TPAH that inhibited 10% and 50% of metamorphosis (IC10 and IC50) was calculated from concentration-response curves (four-parameter logistic models) fitted to the % inhibition and total aromatics data of each treatment using the program GraphPad Prism (v6, San Diego, USA). The model was constrained between 0 and 100% and all curves were tested for normality of the residuals and a replicate test was applied to assess the goodness of fit. The probability that IC50 values generated by the logistic curves were statistically different was tested by applying the F test in Graph Pad Prism v6. IC50s were considered different when p < 0.05. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed to identify treatments which caused significant (p < 0.05) inhibition of metamorphosis in comparison with control treatments (NCSS v9, Utah, USA).

The toxicity of aromatic hydrocarbons are considered additive44 and by combining the concentrations and toxicities of individual compounds, the overall toxicity of a mixture can be predicted. The experimentally derived toxicity and measured concentrations of four main components of the WAF (benzene, toluene, p-xylene and naphthalene) were combined to determine the contribution of these components to the measured toxicity of condensate to coral larvae. This comparison was made by summing the ratios of each component’s concentration by its toxicity TU = Σi (Ci/IC50,i), where TU = toxic unit, Ci = concentration of each component in the 100% WAF = Ci and the IC50 was calculated from concentration response curves. If the total TU of the mixture is 1 or greater an effect on metamorphosis of 50% or more would be expected25.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Negri, A. P. et al. Acute ecotoxicology of natural oil and gas condensate to coral reef larvae. Sci. Rep. 6, 21153; doi: 10.1038/srep21153 (2016).

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Information
srep21153-s1.pdf (446KB, pdf)

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the technical advice from ChemCentre Perth WA and we thank the staff at the AIMS National Sea Simulator for their expertise and assistance. Jan Tebben is thanked for preparing the crustose coralline algae extract. N.S.W. was funded through an Australian Research Council Future Fellowship FT120100480. The funders had no role in data analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Footnotes

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Author Contributions A.P.N., N.S.W. and D.L.B. designed and conducted the experiments. F.F. and E.B. also conducted the experiments. A.P.N., N.S.W., D.L.B., R.J.J. and F.F. analysed the data. A.P.N., N.S.W. and D.L.B. wrote the manuscript and all authors made comments on the manuscript (F.F., E.S.B. and R.J.J.).

References

  1. Storrie J. Montara Wellhead Platform Oil Spill – A Remote Area Response. International Oil Spill Conference Proceedings. March 2011. pp 159. Available at: http://www.ioscproceedings.org/toc/iosc/2011/1 (Accessed: 4th November 2015). (2011).
  2. Atlas R. M. & Hazen T. C. Oil biodegradation and bioremediation: A tale of the two worst spills in U.S. history. Environ. Sci. Tech. 45, 6709–6715 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. McNutt M. K. et al. Review of flow rate estimates of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 109, 20260–20267 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Heyward A. et al. Montara: 2011 Offshore banks assessment survey. Final report for PTTEP Australasia (Ashmore Cartier) Pty. Ltd. Ausrtralian Institute of Marine Science. Available at: https://www.environment.gov.au/system/files/pages/bcefac9b-ebc5-4013-9c88-a356280c202c/files/2011-offshore-banks-assessment-survey.pdf (Accessed 4th November, 2015). 236 pp.
  5. Short M. Montara Well Head Platform Spill: Australia’s First Offshore Oiled Wildlife Response. International Oil Spill Conference Proceedings. March 2011. Available at: http://www.ioscproceedings.org/toc/iosc/2011/1 (Accessed: 4th November 2015). p 208 (2011).
  6. Hovland M. Do carbonate reefs form due to fluid seepage. Terra Nova 2, 8–18 (1990). [Google Scholar]
  7. O’Brien G. W. & Glenn K. C. Natural hydrocarbon seepage, sub-seafloor geology and eustatic sea-level variations as key determiners of the nature and distribution of carbonate build-ups and other benthic habitats in the Timor Sea in: Understanding the Cultural and Natural Heritage Values and Management Challenges of the Ashmore Region (eds Russell B. V. et al.) Supplement 1, pp. 31–42. (Records of the Museums and Art Galleries of the Northern Territory, 2005). [Google Scholar]
  8. Wienberg C., Westphal H., Kwoll E. & Hebbeln D. An isolated carbonate knoll in the Timor Sea (Sahul Shelf, NW Australia): facies zonation and sediment composition. Facies 56, 179–193 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  9. White H. K. et al. Impact of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill on a deep-water coral community in the Gulf of Mexico. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 109, 20303–20308 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Fisher C. R. et al. Footprint of Deepwater Horizon blowout impact to deep-water coral communities. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 111, 11744–11749 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hughes T. P. et al. Climate change, human impacts, and the resilience of coral reefs. Science 301, 929–933 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Loya Y. & Rinkevich B. Effects of oil pollution on coral reef communities. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2, 167–180 (1980). [Google Scholar]
  13. Haapkylä J., Ramade F. & Salvat B. Oil pollution on coral reefs: a review of the state of knowledge and management needs. Vie et milieu 57, 95–111 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  14. Jackson J. B. C. et al. Ecological effects of a major oil spill on Panamanian coastal marine communities. Science 243, 37–44 (1989). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Guzman H. M., Burns K. A. & Jackson J. B. C. Injury, regeneration and growth of Caribbean reef corals after a major oil spill in Panama. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 105, 231–241 (1994). [Google Scholar]
  16. Shafir S., Van Rijn J. & Rinkevich B. Short and long term toxicity of crude oil and oil dispersants to two representative coral species. Environ. Sci. Tech. 41, 5571–5574 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Dodge R. E. et al. The effects of oil and oil dispersants on the skeletal growth of the hermatypic coral Diploria strigosa. Coral Reefs 3, 191–198 (1984). [Google Scholar]
  18. Knap A. H. et al. The effects of oil spills and dispersant use on corals: A review and multidisciplinary experimental approach. Oil and Petrochem. Pollut. 1, 157–169 (1983). [Google Scholar]
  19. Peso-Aguiar M. et al. Effects of petroleum and its derivatives in benthic communities at Baía de Todos os Santos/Todos os Santos Bay, Bahia, Brazil. Aquat. Ecosyst. Health & Manage. 3, 459–470 (2000). [Google Scholar]
  20. Hughes T. P. et al. Patterns of recruitment and abundance of corals along the Great Barrier Reef. Nature 397, 59–63 (1999). [Google Scholar]
  21. Richmond R. H. Coral reefs: present problems and future concerns resulting from anthropogenic disturbance. Am. Zool. 33, 524–536 (1993). [Google Scholar]
  22. Loya Y. Possible effects of water pollution on the community structure of Red Sea corals. Mar. Biol. 29, 177–185 (1975). [Google Scholar]
  23. Rinkevich B. & Loya Y. Harmful effects of chronic oil pollution on a Red Sea scleractinian coral population. Proceedings of the Third International Coral Reef Symposium Maiami Vol. 2 (eds Taylor D. L.) pp 585–591. (1977). [Google Scholar]
  24. Posthuma L., Suter G. W. II & Traas T. P. Species sensitivity distributions in ecotoxicology. 616 p (Lewis Publishers, 2002). [Google Scholar]
  25. Redman A. D. & Parkerton T. F. Guidance for improving comparability and relevance of oil toxicity tests. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 98, 156–170 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Reddy C. M. et al. Composition and fate of gas and oil released to the water column during the Deepwater Horizon oil spill. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 209, 20229–20234 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Diercks A. R. et al. Characterization of subsurface polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons at the Deepwater Horizon site. Geophys. Res. Lett. 37, (2010). [Google Scholar]
  28. Neff J. M., Ostazeski S., Gardiner W. & Stejskal I. Effects of weathering on the toxicity of three offshore Australian crude oils and a diesel fuel to marine animals. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 19, 1809–1821 (2000). [Google Scholar]
  29. Arfsten D. P., Schaeffer D. J. & Mulveny D. C. The effects of near ultraviolet radiation on the toxic effects of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in animals and plants: a review. Ecotoxicol. Env. Safety 33, 1–24 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Goodbody-Gringley G. et al. Toxicity of Deepwater Horizon source oil and the chemical dispersant, Corexit® 9500, to coral larvae. PLoS ONE 8, e45574 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Negri A. P. & Heyward A. J. Inhibition of fertilization and larval metamorphosis of the coral Acropora millepora (Ehrenberg, 1834) by petroleum products. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 41, 420–427 (2000). [Google Scholar]
  32. Lane A. & Harrison P. Effects of oil contaminants on survivorship of larvae of the scleractinian reef corals Acropora tenuis, Goniastrea aspera and Platygyra sinesis from the Great Barrier Reef. 9th International Coral Reef Symposium 1, 403–408 (2002). [Google Scholar]
  33. Peters E. C., Meyers P. A., Yevich P. P. & Blake N. J. Bioaccumulaiton and histopathalogical effects of oil on a stony coral. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 12, 333–339 (1981). [Google Scholar]
  34. Mercurio P., Negri A. P., Burns K. A. & Heyward A. J. The ecotoxicology of vegetable versus mineral based lubricating oils: 3. Coral fertilization and adult corals. Environ. Pollut. 129, 183–194 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Cebrian E. & Uriz M. J. Contrasting effects of heavy metals and hydrocarbons on larval settlement and juvenile survival in sponges. Aquat. Toxicol. 81, 137–143 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Di Toro D. M., McGrath J. A. & Hansen D. J. Technical basis for narcotic chemicals and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon criteria. I. Water and tissue. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 19, 1951–1970 (2000). [Google Scholar]
  37. Heyward A. J. & Negri A. P. Natural inducers for coral larval metamorphosis. Coral Reefs 18, 273–279 (1999). [Google Scholar]
  38. Tebben J. et al. Chemical mediation of coral larval settlement by crustose coralline algae. Sci. Rep. 5, 10803 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Grasso L. C. et al. The biology of coral metamorphosis: molecular responses of larvae to inducers of settlement and metamorphosis. Develop. Biol. 353, 411–419 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Pelletier M. C. et al. Phototoxicity of individual polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and petroleum to marine invertebrate larvae and juveniles. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 16, 2190–2199 (1997). [Google Scholar]
  41. McGrath J. A. & Di Toro D. M. Validation of the target lipid model for toxicity assessment of residual petroleum constituents: monocyclic and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 28, 1130–1148 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Billiard S. M., Meyer J. N., Wassenberg D. M., Hodson P. V. & Di Giulio R. T. Non-additive effects of PAHs on early vertebrate development: mechanisms and implications for risk assessment. Toxicol. Sci. 105, 5–23 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Peters E. C., Gassman N. J., Firman J. C., Richmond R. H. & Power E. A. Ecotoxicology of tropical marine ecosystems. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 16, 12–40 (1997). [Google Scholar]
  44. French-McCay D. P. Development and application of an oil toxicity and exposure model, OilToxEx. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 21, 2080–2094 (2002). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Aurand D. & Coelho G. Cooperative aquatic toxicity testing of dispersed oil and the “Chemical Response to Oil Spills: Ecological Effects Research Forum (CROSERF).” Technical Report 07-03 (2005) 105 p Avaialabe at: http://www.hdrinc.com/sites/all/files/assets/knowledge-center/final-croserf-report.pdf (accessed 4th November, 2015).
  46. Singer M. M. et al. Standardization of the preparation and quantitation of water-accommodated fractions of petroleum for toxicity testing. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 40, 1007–1016 (2000). [Google Scholar]
  47. Barron M. G. & Ka’aihue L. Critical evaluation of CROSERF test methods for oil dispersant toxicity testing under subarctic conditions. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 46, 1191–1199 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Oil Spill N. R. C. Dispersants: Efficacy and Effects, Committee on Understanding Oil Spill Dispersants: Efficacy and Effects, National Research Council, The National Academies Press. (2005) Available at: http://www.nap.edu/catalog/11283.html (Accessed: 4th November 2015).
  49. Jones R., Ricardo G. & Negri A. P. Effects of sediments on the reproductive cycle of corals. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 100, 13–33 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Whalan S., Ettinger-Epstein P. & de Nys R. The effect of temperature on larval pre-settlement duration and metamorphosis for the sponge, Rhopaloeides odorabile. Coral Reefs 27, 783–786 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  51. Webster N. S. et al. Bacterial community dynamics in the marine sponge Rhopaloeides odorabile under in situ and ex situ cultivation. Mar. Biotech. 13, 296–304 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Whalan S., Ettinger-Epstein P., Battershill C. & de Nys R. Larval vertical migration and hierarchical selectivity of settlement in a brooding marine sponge. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 368, 145–154 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  53. Whalan S. & Webster N. Sponge larval settlement cues: the role of microbial biofilms in a warming ocean. Sci. Rep. 4, 4072 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Negri A. P. et al. Effects of the herbicide diuron on the early life history stages of coral. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 51, 370–383 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Te F. Effects of two petroleum products on Pocillopora damicornis planulae. Pac. Sci. 45, 290–298 (1991). [Google Scholar]
  56. Harrison P. L. Oil pollutants inhibit fertilization and larval settlement in the scleractinian reef coral Acropora tenuis from the Great Barrier Reef. Australia Sources Fates and Consequences of Pollutants in the Great Barrier Reef and Torres Strait (1999). Available at: http://elibrary.gbrmpa.gov.au/jspui/bitstream/11017/332/1/Sources-fates-and-consequences-of-pollutants-in-the-Great-Barrier-Reef-and-Torres-Strait-conference-abstracts.PDF (Accessed: 4th November 2015).
  57. Epstein N., Bak R. P. M. & Rinkevich B. Toxicity of third generation dispersants and dispersed egyptian crude oil on red sea coral larvae. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 40, 497–503 (2000). [Google Scholar]
  58. Villanueva R. D., Montano M. N. E. & Yap H. T. Effects of natural gas condensate - water accommodated fraction on coral larvae. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 56, 1422–1428 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Villanueva R. D., Yap H. T. & Montano M. N. E. Reproductive effects of the water-accommodated fraction of a natural gas condensate in the Indo-Pacific reef-building coral Pocillopora damicornis. Ecotoxicol. Env. Safety 74, 2268–2274 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Hartmann A. C. et al. Crude oil contamination interrupts settlement of coral larvae after direct exposure ends. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 536, 163–173 (2015). [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information
srep21153-s1.pdf (446KB, pdf)

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES