Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Feb 28.
Published in final edited form as: Chem Commun (Camb). 2016 Feb 5;52(17):3576–3579. doi: 10.1039/c5cc09753c

Catalytic Insertion of Aldehydes into Dihalonitroacetophenones via Sequential Bond Scission-Aldol Reaction-Acyl Transfer

Ransheng Ding 1, Christian Wolf 1,*
PMCID: PMC4760845  NIHMSID: NIHMS757964  PMID: 26846436

Abstract

A catalytic process that provides dihalogenated nitro alcohols in up to 99% yield and with 100% atom economy is described. In-situ cleavage of dihalonitroacetophenones affords nitronates that undergo Lewis acid catalyzed addition to aldehydes. Final benzoylation renders the sequence irreversible and regenerates the bond scission and acyl transfer agent.

Graphical abstract

graphic file with name nihms757964u1.jpg


The development of synthetic methodologies for the production of organofluorines has received widespread attention in the past decade.1 The general interest and advance in fluorination chemistry has primarily been fueled by the growing impact of fluorinated pharmaceuticals.2 Surprisingly, a recent survey on the diversity of elements in small drugs revealed that chlorine is much more frequently encountered in US FDA approved pharmaceuticals than fluorine.3 Impressive examples of the total synthesis of chlorinated natural products have appeared in the literature.4 But the pace of introduction of new methods that furnish organochlorine compounds5 has fallen behind the compelling progress with organofluorine synthesis.

Aliphatic nitro compounds are versatile building blocks that provide unique opportunities for the construction of multifunctionalized carbon frameworks. This has been exemplified by nitroaldol and Michael reactions,6 allylations,7 arylations,8 alkylations9 and amide bond synthesis.10 The general popularity of nitroalkanes is in stark contrast to the scarce use of halogenated derivatives. In particular, the development of new methods that exploit dihalogenated nucleophiles such as dichloro- and difluoronitronates bears huge synthetic potential that remains to be explored. A persisting problem is that the generation of dichloronitromethane and its carbanion requires conditions that impede scale-up and favor side reactions including dehalogenation and carbene formation. The impracticality of the production and handling of dichloronitromethane and its conjugated base, which can be prepared from potassium nitroacetate and chlorine gas or via tin insertion into trichloronitromethane,11 has limited synthetic applications. The lack of reports on C-C bond formation with difluoronitromethane, first prepared by Bissell by thermal decomposition of difluoronitroacetamidine and careful isolation at very low temperatures, can be attributed to its high volatility.12 We hypothesized that these drawbacks can be overcome with a new synthetic methodology that exploits mild in situ generation of dihalonitronates 2 from readily available bench-stable nitroketones 1 (Scheme 1).

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

Features of the LiBr/amine catalyzed C-C scission/nitronate addition/benzoyl transfer sequence and crystallographic analysis of the 2-nitro- and 4-nitrobenzaldehyde insertion products.

The possibility of practical dichloronitronate and difluoronitronate formation under mild reaction conditions and subsequent trapping with a suitable electrophile, for example an aldehyde, would provide an unprecedented entry to the direct synthesis of a variety of dihalogenated nitro compounds. However, at least three additional issues inherent to the nitroaldol reaction would have to be addressed. First, the use of dihalonitronates, which are excellent leaving groups and expected to favor the retro-aldol reaction, would require a strategy that renders the C-C bond formation step irreversible. Second, mild reaction conditions would be needed to extend the application scope to enolizable aldehydes. Third, nitroaldol reaction protocols typically have low atom economy and almost exclusively call for large excess of nitroalkanes unless solvent free conditions are applied.13 Therefore, a catalytic procedure that utilizes equimolar amounts of both the substrate and the prenucleophile forming the nitronate is very desirable. In particular, the general requirement for 5–10 equivalents of nitromethane or other nitroalkanes, which furnish the intermediate nitronate via deprotonation in the presence of base, has been a longstanding drawback of the Henry reaction. We expected that this might be solved with a methodically different approach based on in situ nitronate formation via C-C cleavage of a bench-stable precursor rather than nitroalkane deprotonation. A procedure devoid of an acid-base equilibrium would also facilitate trapping of the aldol product via acylation and thus eliminate any possible retro-aldol interference. We now wish to report the development of a synthetic methodology that addresses all issues outlined above. We further discuss the synthetic scope and provide mechanistic insights into the catalytic process that involves sequential bond-scission of 1, nucleophilic addition of 2 to aldehydes and final benzoyl group transfer to give 3 or 9 with 100% atom economy.

At the beginning of this study, we decided to evaluate the feasibility of C-C scission of dichloronitroacetophenone, 1a, which was readily prepared in 80% yield by dichlorination of α-nitroacetophenone with N-chlorosuccinimide. NMR analysis confirmed the anticipated formation of benzoyl pyrrolidine, 4, and dichloronitromethane, 5, upon addition of stoichiometric amounts of pyrrolidine at room temperature (see ESI). The two scission products 4 and 5 were initially present in equimolar amounts and the cleavage of 1a was almost quantitative after 75 min. The dichloronitromethane/benzoyl pyrrolidine ratio, however, decreased over time which may be attributed to decomposition of 5. Because of the reversibility with halogenated nitroalkanes and the common necessity to use considerable excess of nitroalkanes in the Henry reaction, we were not surprised that the reaction between 5 and 4-nitrobenzaldehyde, 6a, was sluggish even in the presence of additional base and Lewis acids. By contrast, the reaction course outlined in Scheme 1, i.e. the cleavage of 1a and subsequent addition of the dichloronitronate 2a and the benzoyl moiety to 6a was achieved when we employed 3 equivalents of LiBr and stoichiometric amounts of Et3N or DMAP in THF. The replacement of pyrrolidine with triethylamine or DMAP circumvents the generation of free 5 and sets the stage for irreversible C-C bond formation. Under these conditions, we were able to isolate 2,2-dichloro-2-nitro-1-(4-nitrophenyl)ethyl benzoate, 3a, in up to 74% yield (ESI), and we obtained crystallographic proof for the proposed 3-step reaction sequence (scission of 1a, C-C bond formation, acyl transfer) with two aldehyde substrates (Scheme 1).14

Further reaction analysis suggested that a catalytic version of this transformation should be possible. At this point, we decided to restrict our development efforts to conditions that utilize readily available, inexpensive catalysts and equimolar amounts of 1a and aldehyde to afford a practical method with high atom economy. Comprehensive screening efforts showed that the formal insertion of 6a into 1a occurs quantitatively when catalytic amounts of LiBr and (i-Pr)2NEt are used in THF (ESI). We also observed almost 100% conversion and no sign of side reactions with other aldehydes when homogeneous conditions were maintained, and we therefore based the solvent selection on the substrate solubility (ESI). With an optimized method in hand, we then investigated the substrate scope. As shown in Table 1, the reaction between 1a and aromatic substrates exhibiting several functional groups gave excellent results, ranging from 88% to 99% yield (entries 1–8. Similarly, the heterocyclic aldehydes 6i and 6j were smoothly converted to the dichloronitro benzoates 3i and 3j, however, the yield decreases when electron-donating groups are present (entries 9–11). The mild conditions tolerate enolizable substrates, and the insertion of hydrocinnamaldehyde, 6l, and hexanal, 6m, into 1a gave the dichloronitro benzoates 3l and 3m in very good yields (entries 12 and 13).

Table 1.

Synthesis of O-benzoyl α,α-dichloro-α-nitro alcoholsa

graphic file with name nihms757964u2.jpg
Entry Aldehyde Product Yield (%)b
1c graphic file with name nihms757964t1.jpg
6a
graphic file with name nihms757964t2.jpg
3a
90
2d graphic file with name nihms757964t3.jpg
6b
graphic file with name nihms757964t4.jpg
3b
94
3e graphic file with name nihms757964t5.jpg
6c
graphic file with name nihms757964t6.jpg
3c
98
4f graphic file with name nihms757964t7.jpg
6d
graphic file with name nihms757964t8.jpg
3d
99
5c graphic file with name nihms757964t9.jpg
6e
graphic file with name nihms757964t10.jpg
3e
96
6f graphic file with name nihms757964t11.jpg
6f
graphic file with name nihms757964t12.jpg
3f
99
7d graphic file with name nihms757964t13.jpg
6g
graphic file with name nihms757964t14.jpg
3g
95
8 graphic file with name nihms757964t15.jpg
6h
graphic file with name nihms757964t16.jpg
3h
88
9f graphic file with name nihms757964t17.jpg
6i
graphic file with name nihms757964t18.jpg
3i
99
10f graphic file with name nihms757964t19.jpg
6j
graphic file with name nihms757964t20.jpg
3j
91
11 graphic file with name nihms757964t21.jpg
6k
graphic file with name nihms757964t22.jpg
3k
59
12f,g graphic file with name nihms757964t23.jpg
6l
graphic file with name nihms757964t24.jpg
3l
93
13f,g graphic file with name nihms757964t25.jpg
6m
graphic file with name nihms757964t26.jpg
3m
81
a

Reaction conditions: LiBr (0.05 mmol), DIPEA (0.05 mmol), aldehyde 6 (0.25 mmol) and 1a (0.30 mmol) in 0.15 mL of anhydrous ether at 25 °C.

b

Isolated yields.

c

THF.

d

(i-Pr)2O.

e

Et2O.

f

MTBE.

g

The aldehyde was added in portions.

To highlight the utility of the dihalonitromethyl derived alcohols 3, we employed a procedure reported by Ballini to affect denitration and extension of the carbon bond framework (Scheme 2).15 We were pleased to find that the AIBN initiated radical allylation and reduction occurred with typical literature yields. The reduction of 3e with tributyltin hydride furnished 7 in 76% yield and the reaction with allyltributylstannane gave 8 in 70% yield. The formation of 7 shows that this work provides practical access to compounds having a dichloromethyl group which is an important subunit in pharmaceuticals including Mitotane, Chloramphenicol, Trichlormethiazide and Methoxyflurane.16,17 The allylation of 3e toward 8 exemplifies that the terminal nitrodichloromethyl moiety in 3 provides an entry to the synthesis of elongated structures with a central dichloromethylene group.

Scheme 2.

Scheme 2

Denitration and allylation of 3e.

The success with the catalysis summarized in Table 1 led us to question if this method can be extended to difluororonitroacetophenone, 1b. After several attempts, we were able to prepare 1b by fluorination of α-nitroacetophenone with Selectfluor in 75% yield (ESI). Following the protocol used for the coupling of aldehydes and 1a we obtained the corresponding difluoronitromethyl derived alcohols 9a–e in 88 to 99% yield (Scheme 3).18

Scheme 3.

Scheme 3

Synthesis of O-benzoyl α,α-difluoro-α-nitro alcohols 9 using 1b.

Finally, we investigated the mechanism of the formal aldehyde insertion into dihalonitroacetophenones. The cleavage of dichloronitroacetophenone in the presence of catalytic amounts of diisopropylethylamine and lithium bromide and the subsequent reaction with 4-nitrobenzaldehyde to the O-benzoyl nitroaldol product were monitored by React FTIR analysis (Figure 1). A THF solution of 4-nitrobenzaldehyde, 6a, and lithium bromide (20 mol%) was stirred under nitrogen atmosphere at room temperature showing the characteristic carbonyl stretching absorption of the aldehyde group at 1710 cm−1. After 10 minutes, one equivalent of 1a was added. The ketone 1a has strong IR absorptions at 1720 and 1705 cm−1 that essentially overlap with the aldehyde stretching. After another 3 minutes, diisopropylethylamine (20 mol%) was added to start the reaction. Immediately, a steady decrease in the combined aldehyde and ketone stretching absorptions at 1712 cm−1 was observed while a new signal at 1746 cm−1 appeared. The latter signal correlates well to the IR absorption of the isolated benzoyl ester at 1741 cm−1 and was therefore assigned to the reaction product 3a. The conversion of 6a was almost complete after 5 h. The cleavage of 1a with a tertiary amine was also investigated by 1H and 13C NMR spectroscopy (see ESI). Mixing of 1a and triethylamine did not show any spectroscopic change even after 20 minutes, indicating that the equilibrium of the C-C bond scission lies far on the side of the starting materials. However, this mixture showed spontaneous and quantitative cleavage of 1a and formation of methyl benzoate and dichloronitronate upon addition of methanol. This suggests that the tertiary amine generates small amounts of the free dichloronitronate which is sufficient to initiate the reaction sequence. We found no sign of a reaction between dichloronitroacetophenone and methanol in the absence of triethylamine. The tertiary amine, or another nucleophile such as DMAP, is therefore essential for (a) the C-C scission of the dihalonitroacetophenone which generates the dihalonitronate and (b) the transfer of the benzoyl group to the intermediate aldol product.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

React FTIR analysis of the C-C scission/nitronate addition/benzoyl transfer sequence using 6a as substrate in THF. The arrows indicate the addition of dichloronitroacetophenone (BDCNM) and (i-Pr)2NEt.

Based on our NMR and IR studies, we propose the catalytic cycle shown in Scheme 4. The initial nucleophilic attack of (i-Pr)2NEt at the dihalonitroacetophenone, 1, which might be activated by the Li Lewis acid, generates small amounts of dihalonitronate 2 and the benzoylammonium species A. The lithium catalyzed aldol reaction with the aldehyde may involve a chairlike transition state B and yields C which is consumed by irreversible benzoylation with A. The formation of 3 coincides with the regeneration of (i-Pr)2NEt and LiBr. In accordance with our mechanistic studies we found that the reaction does not occur in the presence of LiBr unless a N-nucleophile is added which rules out the involvement of an acyl bromide intermediate. Altogether, the formal insertion of an aldehyde into 1 involves 3 sequential steps controlled by a tertiary amine or another nucleophile and a Lewis acid. The latter activates the aldehyde and catalyzes the central C-C bond forming step and the former induces the scission of 1 and acts as an acyl transfer agent to capture the final product.19

Scheme 4.

Scheme 4

Proposed mechanism of the catalytic C-C scission-nitronate addition-benzoyl transfer sequence.

In summary, we have introduced a catalytic method that inserts aldehydes into dihalonitroacetophenones providing unprecedented access to a series of α,α-dihalogentated nitro alcohols with excellent yields. Mechanistic studies demonstrate that this process is based on sequential C-C cleavage, nucleophilic addition and acyl transfer steps. The initial dihalonitroacetophenone scission generates a dihalonitronate that undergoes Lewis acid catalyzed addition to an aldehyde substrate which is finally benzoylated. While the central C-C bond formation is catalyzed by lithium bromide, the roles of diisopropylethylamine are to cleave the dihalonitroacetophenone and to act as acyl transfer agent. This method has several attractive features: The reaction is irreversible and involves in situ formation of reactive dihalonitronates under mild conditions (1), elevated temperatures and expensive transition metal complexes are avoided (2), and the use of stoichiometric amounts of the substrate and reagent affords 100% atom economy (3). Altogether, this methodology effectively circumvents the common deprotonation step in traditional aldol chemistry to generate a nucleophile. We believe that the combination of bond scission with mild in situ generation of a reactive intermediate described herein holds considerable promise for the introduction of currently elusive nucleophiles and the development of other reactions that are currently restricted by interfering acid/base equilibria.

Supplementary Material

Crystal Data
ESI

Acknowledgments

We greatfully acknowledge financial support from the National Institutes of Health (GM106260).

Footnotes

Electronic Supplementary Information (ESI) available: Experimental procedures, compound characterization and NMR spectra of all compounds. See DOI: 10.1039/x0xx00000x

Notes and references

  • 1.a) Liang T, Neumann CN, Ritter T. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2013;52:8214. doi: 10.1002/anie.201206566. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Zhang P, Wolf C. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2013;52:7869. doi: 10.1002/anie.201303551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Yang X, Wu T, Phipps RJ, Toste FD. Chem Rev. 2015;115:826. doi: 10.1021/cr500277b. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d) Mei H, Acena JL, Soloshonok VA, Roeschenthaler GV, Han J. Eur J Org Chem. 2015;6401 [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Wang J, Sanchez-Rosello M, Acena JL, del Pozo C, Sorochinsky AE, Fustero S, Soloshonok VA, Liu H. Chem Rev. 2014;114:2432. doi: 10.1021/cr4002879. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Smith BR, Eastman CM, Njardarson JT. J Med Chem. 2014;57:9764. doi: 10.1021/jm501105n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.a) Nilewski C, Geisser RW, Carreira EM. Nature. 2009;457:573. doi: 10.1038/nature07734. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Snyder SA, Tang ZY, Gupta R. J Am Chem Soc. 2009;131:5744. doi: 10.1021/ja9014716. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Nilewski C, Deprez NR, Fessard TC, Li DB, Geisser RW, Carreira EM. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2011;50:7940. doi: 10.1002/anie.201102521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d) Chung WJ, Vanderwal CD. Acc Chem Res. 2014;47:718. doi: 10.1021/ar400246w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Selected examples: Nicolaou KC, Simmons NL, Ying Y, Heretsch PM, Chen JS. J Am Chem Soc. 2011;133:8134. doi: 10.1021/ja202555m.Monaco MR, Bella M. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2011;50:11044. doi: 10.1002/anie.201104843.Denmark SE, Kuester WE, Burk MT. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2012;51:10938. doi: 10.1002/anie.201204347.Chen J, Zhou L. Synthesis. 2014:586.Cresswell AJ, Eey ST-C, Denmark SE. Nat Chem. 2015;7:146. doi: 10.1038/nchem.2141.Hu DX, Seidl FJ, Bucher C, Burns NZ. J Am Chem Soc. 2015;137:3795. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b01384.
  • 6.Ono N. The Nitro Group in Organic Synthesis. Wiley; New York: 2001. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.a) Rieck H, Helmchen G. Angew Chem, Int Ed Engl. 1996;34:2687. [Google Scholar]; b) Trost BM, Surivet JP. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2000;39:3122. doi: 10.1002/1521-3773(20000901)39:17<3122::aid-anie3122>3.0.co;2-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Maki K, Kanai M, Shibasaki M. Tetrahedron. 2007;63:4250. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Vogl EM, Buchwald SL. J Org Chem. 2000;67:106. doi: 10.1021/jo010953v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.a) Katritzky AR, Kashmiri MA, De Ville GZ, Patel RC. J Am Chem Soc. 1983;105:90. [Google Scholar]; c) Gildner PG, Gietter AAS, Cui D, Watson DA. J Am Chem Soc. 2012;134:9942. doi: 10.1021/ja304561c. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.a) Shen B, Makley DM, Johnston JN. Nature. 2010;465:1027. doi: 10.1038/nature09125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Schwieter KE, Johnston JN. Chem Sci. 2015;6:2590. doi: 10.1039/c5sc00064e. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.a) Steinkopf W, Kuhnel M. Ber Dtsch Chem Ges. 1942;75B:1323. [Google Scholar]; b) Demir AS, Tanyeli C, Mahasneh AS, Aksoy H. Synthesis. 1994:155. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.a) Bissell ER. J Org Chem. 1963;28:1717. [Google Scholar]; b) Butler P, Golding BT, Laval G, Loghmani-Khouzani H, Ranjbar-Karimib R, Sadeghib MM. Tetrahedron. 2007;63:11160. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Henry reactions with stoichiometric amounts of MeNO2: Majhi A, Kadam ST, Kim SS. Bull Korean Chem Soc. 2009;30:1767.Rokhum L, Bez G. Can J Chem. 2013;91:300.
  • 14.CCDC numbers 1425090 and 1425091 contain the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. These data can be obtained free of charge from The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre via www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif.
  • 15.Ballini R, Petrini M, Polimanti O. J Org Chem. 1996;61:5652. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Recent examples of dichloromethylation: Behr JB, Chavaria D, Plantier-Royon R. J Org Chem. 2013;78:11477. doi: 10.1021/jo402028r.Tian Y, Liu ZQ. RSC Adv. 2014;4:64855.
  • 17.The CHF2 group is present in Pantoprazole, Eflornithine, and Enflurane. Selected difluoromethylations of aromatic or vinylic substrates: Fujiwara Y, Dixon JA, Rodriguez RA, Baxter RD, Dixon DD, Collins MR, Blackmond DG, Baran PS. J Am Chem Soc. 2012;134:1494. doi: 10.1021/ja211422g.Prakash GKS, Ganesh SK, Jones JP, Kulkarni A, Masood K, Swabeck JK, Olah GA. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2012;51:12090. doi: 10.1002/anie.201205850.Xiao YL, Guo WH, He GZ, Pan Q, Zhang X. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2014;53:9909. doi: 10.1002/anie.201405653.Min QQ, Yin Z, Feng Z, Guo WH, Zhang X. J Am Chem Soc. 2014;136:1230. doi: 10.1021/ja4114825.Feng Z, Min QQ, Xiao YL, Zhang B, Zhang X. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2014;53:1669. doi: 10.1002/anie.201309535.Belhomme MC, Besset T, Poisson T, Pannecoucke X. Chem Eur J. 2015;21:12836. doi: 10.1002/chem.201501475.
  • 18.Aliphatic aldehydes did not react and attempts to reduce or hydrolyze the difluoronitro benzoates 9 resulted in defluorination and decomposition.
  • 19.For related cyanoacylations, see: Zhang W, Shi M. Org Biomol Chem. 2006;4:1671. doi: 10.1039/b602197b. and references therein.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal Data
ESI

RESOURCES