Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 19;4:e09066. doi: 10.7554/eLife.09066

Table 4.

Data collection and processing parameters for analysis of the SorT/SorU complex in solution by Small Angle X-ray Scattering (SAXS).

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.09066.009

Data collection parameters
Instrument SAXSess (Anton Paar)
Beam geometry 10 mm slit
AH, LH (Å-1), GNOM beam geometry definition 0.28, 0.12
q-range measured (Å-1) 0.01-0.400
Exposure time (min) 60 (4 x 15)
SorT2SorU2 concentration range (mg mL-1) 2.75-5.5
Temperature (ºC) 10
Structural parameters*
Rg (Å), I(0) (cm-1)
from Guinier (desmeared data) q*Rg < 1.3
30.8 ± 0.4, 0.223 ± 0.002
Rg (Å), I(0) (cm-1)
from P(r) (q-range 0.01 – 0.25 Å-1)
32.0 ± 0.3, 0.235 ± 0.002
dmax (Å) from P(r) 110
Molecular mass determination*
Molecular mass Mrfrom Guinier I(0) (ratio with expected) 108741 (0.984)
Molecular mass Mrfrom P(r) I(0) (ratio with expected) 114593 (1.037)
SorT2SorU2 parameters calculated from sequence and chemical composition
Molecular volume (Å3) 134385
Molecular weight Mr (Da) 110556
Partial specific volume (cm3 g-1) 0.732
Contrast (X-rays) (Δρ x 1010 cm-2) 2.895
Modeling results and validation
Crystal structure Rg, dmax (Å)
SorT/SorU2/SorT
SorT

31.3, 108
27.9, 99
Crystal structure compare to desmeared I(q) (χ-value)
SorT/SorU2/SorT (q-range 0.01 – 0.15 Å-1)
SorT (q-range 0.01 – 0.15 Å-1)

1.7
2.3
Results from 10 ab initio shape restorations. P1 symmetry:
Average molecular volume (Å3)
Normalised spatial distribution (NSD) and NSD variation
χ value for fit to desmeared data

140800
0.508 (0.008)
1.8
Software employed
Calculation of expected Mr, △ρ and υ values MULCh
Primary data reduction, I(q) vs q SAXSQuant 1D
Desmearing SAXSQuant
Guinier analysis PRIMUS
P(r) analysis GNOM
Model I(q) from crystal coordinates CRYSOL
ab initio shape restorations DAMMIN
3D graphics representations PYMOL

*Reported for 2.75 mg ml-1 measurement.