Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Pathology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Pathology
. 1976 Jun;29(6):530–533. doi: 10.1136/jcp.29.6.530

Comparative study of two systems for detecting becteraemia and septicaemia.

N G Wood
PMCID: PMC476111  PMID: 939807

Abstract

Two blood culturing systems were compared in parallel-a semi-automated radiometric method, BACTEC1, and the conventional method used in our laboratory. BACTEC contains radioactive 14C labelled substrates and monitors the level of 14CO2 evolved by actively metabolizing bacteria. BACTEC was as efficient as the conventional method in detecting positive cultures and indicated that it was superior in detecting positive cultures earlier than the conventional system.

Full text

PDF
530

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Brooks K., Sodeman T. Rapid detection of bacteremia by a radiometric system. A clinical evaluation. Am J Clin Pathol. 1974 Jun;61(6):859–866. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/61.6.859. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Smith A. G., Little R. R. Detection of bacteremia by an automated radiometric method and a tubed broth method. Ann Clin Lab Sci. 1974 Nov-Dec;4(6):448–455. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Thiemke W. A., Wicher K. Laboratory experience with a radiometric method for detecting bacteremia. J Clin Microbiol. 1975 Mar;1(3):302–308. doi: 10.1128/jcm.1.3.302-308.1975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Pathology are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES