Skip to main content
PMC home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2016 Feb 22;6:21480. doi: 10.1038/srep21480

Nighttime sleep duration, 24-hour sleep duration and risk of all-cause mortality among adults: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies

Xiaoli Shen 1,*, Yili Wu 1,*, Dongfeng Zhang 1,a
PMCID: PMC4761879  PMID: 26900147

Abstract

A dose-response meta-analysis was conducted to summarize evidence from prospective cohort studies about the association of nighttime sleep duration and 24-hour sleep duration with risk of all-cause mortality among adults. Pertinent studies were identified by a search of Embase and PubMed databases to March 2015. A two-stage random-effects dose–response meta-analysis was used to combine study-specific relative risks and 95% confidence intervals [RRs (95% CIs)]. Thirty-five articles were included. Compared with 7 hours/day, the RRs (95% CIs) of all-cause mortality were 1.07 (1.03–1.13), 1.04 (1.01–1.07), 1.01 (1.00–1.02), 1.07 (1.06–1.09), 1.21 (1.18–1.24), 1.37 (1.32–1.42) and 1.55 (1.47–1.63) for 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10 and 11 hours/day of nighttime sleep, respectively (146,830 death cases among 1,526,609 participants), and the risks were 1.09 (1.04–1.14), 1.05 (1.02–1.09), 1.02 (1.00–1.03), 1.08 (1.05–1.10), 1.27 (1.20–1.36), 1.53 (1.38–1.70) and 1.84 (1.59–2.13) for 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10 and 11 hours/day of 24-hour sleep, respectively (101,641 death cases among 903,727 participants). The above relationships were also found in subjects without cardiovascular diseases and cancer at baseline, and other covariates did not influence the relationships substantially. The results suggested that 7 hours/day of sleep duration should be recommended to prevent premature death among adults.

Over the past 30 years, there has been an increasing interest in the association between sleep and health outcomes1. Sleep problems are common and are anticipated to increase with the rapid advent of the ‘24/7’ society involving round-the-clock activities and increasing night-time use of television and internet1,2. Previous studies showed that short duration of sleep is associated with increased risks of stroke, coronary heart disease, metabolic syndrome, hypertension, central adiposity, obesity and type 2 diabetes2,3,4,5,6,7,8, and long duration of sleep is also associated with increased risks of stroke, coronary heart disease, type 2 diabetes, and colorectal cancer2,3,8,9. These data suggest that sleep duration may be associated with the risk of all-cause mortality. While a previous systematic review10 indicated that both short and long duration of sleep are predictors of all-cause mortality among adults, the risk of all-cause mortality associated with specific duration of sleep has not been summarized, and the definition of short and long duration of sleep differed between studies which might complicate the interpretation of pooled results. In addition, results from recent prospective cohort studies11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29 on sleep duration and the risk of all-cause mortality among adults have not also been quantitatively summarized with a meta-analysis. Therefore, we conducted a dose-response meta-analysis following the PRISMA guidelines (Table S1) to quantitatively assess the effect of nighttime sleep duration and 24-hour sleep duration on the risk of all-cause mortality among adults, respectively.

Results

Study characteristics

The flow chart for study inclusion is shown in Figure S1. A total of 35 articles were included in this meta-analysis. Among the 35 articles, 14 were conducted in Asia, 11 in Europe, 8 in USA, 1 in Brazil and 1 in Australia. The duration of follow-up ranged from 2.8 to 25 years. Sleep duration was obtained by self-administered or interviewer-administered questionnaires in all studies but 1 study29 (sleep diaries were used). The mean age of participants ranged from 40.7 to 83.4 years. All studies adjusted for age and sex (or gender-specific results were provided). The reference category of sleep duration is 6–9 hours/day, but most of studies treated 7–8 hours/day as the reference category. The included studies met the quality score of 4 to 8 stars. For nighttime sleep duration, results from 25 articles with 36 results (gender-specific results were provided in 11 articles) were used including 146,830 deaths among 1,526,609 participants. For 24-hour sleep duration, results from 13 articles with 19 results (gender-specific results were provided in 6 articles) were used including 101,641 deaths among 903,727 participants. Detailed characteristics of the included studies are shown in Table S2.

Quantitative Synthesis

Nighttime sleep duration and all-cause mortality

Table 1 Compared with 7 hours/day, a U-shaped relationship between nighttime sleep duration and risk of all-cause mortality was found (Pfor non-linearity <0.001), and the RRs (95% CIs) of all-cause mortality were 1.07 (1.03–1.13), 1.04 (1.01–1.07), 1.01 (1.00–1.02), 1.07 (1.06–1.09), 1.21 (1.18–1.24), 1.37 (1.32–1.42) and 1.55 (1.47–1.63) for 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10 and 11 hours/day of nighttime sleep (Fig. 1), respectively. There is low between-study heterogeneity among study-specific trends, defined by the coefficients of the first (I2 = 29%) and second (I2 = 2%) spline transformations of nighttime sleep duration. No publication bias was found (P = 0.57). Sensitivity analysis showed that exclusion of any one study did not influence the relationship (all P values for non-linearity <0.001). Among subjects without cancer and cardiovascular diseases at baseline21,24,27,28,30,31, the risks were 1.23 (1.10–1.37), 1.14 (1.06–1.22), 1.05 (1.02–1.09), 1.04 (1.02–1.05), 1.11 (1.08–1.15), 1.19 (1.14–1.25) and 1.28 (1.21–1.36) for 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10 and 11 hours/day, respectively (44,998 death cases among 329,420 participants).

Table 1. Pooled measures on the relation of nighttime sleep duration and risk of all-cause mortality.
  RR (95% CI) by hours of nighttime sleep per day
Na Deaths 4 hours 5 hours 6 hours 7 hours 8 hours 9 hours 10 hours 11 hours
Overall 36 146,830 1.07 (1.03–1.13) 1.04 (1.01–1.07) 1.01 (1.00–1.02) 1.00 1.07 (1.06–1.09) 1.21 (1.18–1.24) 1.37 (1.32–1.42) 1.55 (1.47–1.63)
Subjects without cardiovascular diseases and cancer at baseline 10 44,998 1.23 (1.10–1.37) 1.14 (1.06–1.22) 1.05 (1.02–1.09) 1.00 1.04 (1.02–1.05) 1.11 (1.08–1.15) 1.19 (1.14–1.25) 1.28 (1.21–1.36)
Country
 Asia 18 21,640 1.07 (0.94–1.22) 1.05 (0.95–1.16) 1.00 (0.97–1.04) 1.00 1.11 (1.08–1.13) 1.36 (1.28–1.43) 1.70 (1.55–1.85) 2.12 (1.87–2.40)
 Europe 9 20,186 1.31 (1.15–1.49) 1.18 (1.08–1.29) 1.07 (1.02–1.12) 1.00 1.05 (1.00–1.11) 1.15 (1.03–1.28) 1.26 (1.07–1.48) —
 USA 8 90,732 1.11 (1.07–1.14) 1.06 (1.04–1.09) 1.02 (1.01–1.03) 1.00 1.02 (1.01–1.03) 1.07 (1.05–1.19) 1.11 (1.09–1.14) 1.16 (1.12–1.20)
Sex
 Men 12 39,440 1.12 (1.02–1.21) 1.07 (1.01–1.13) 1.03 (1.00–1.06) 1.00 1.04 (1.02–1.06) 1.14 (1.10–1.18) 1.25 (1.18–1.31) 1.37 (1.28–1.47)
 Women 12 70,175 1.07 (1.02–1.12) 1.04 (1.01–1.07) 1.01 (1.00–1.03) 1.00 1.06 (1.05–1.07) 1.18 (1.15–1.21) 1.33 (1.28–1.38) 1.49 (1.41–1.57)
 Both 12 37215 1.07 (0.97–1.18) 1.04 (0.97–1.11) 1.00 (0.97–1.04) 1.00 1.09 (1.05–1.12) 1.20 (1.13–1.28) 1.33 (1.21–1.46) —
Mean age
 >60 years 19 45,824 1.04 (0.96–1.13) 1.02 (0.96–1.08) 1.00 (0.97–1.03) 1.00 1.11 (1.08–1.13) 1.36 (1.30–1.44) 1.71 (1.57–1.87) 2.14 (1.90–2.42)
 ≤60 years 17 101,006 1.11 (1.07–1.15) 1.07 (1.04–1.09) 1.02 (1.01–1.04) 1.00 1.05 (1.04–1.06) 1.15 (1.12–1.17) 1.25 (1.22–1.29) 1.37 (1.31–1.43)
Follow-up duration
 ≥10 years 20 54,615 1.15 (1.07–1.23) 1.09 (1.03–1.14) 1.03 (1.00–1.05) 1.00 1.09 (1.07–1.11) 1.25 (1.21–1.29) 1.44 (1.36–1.52) 1.66 (1.54–1.78)
 <10 years 16 92,215 1.00 (0.95–1.06) 1.00 (0.96–1.03) 0.99 (0.97–1.01) 1.00 1.09 (1.06–1.11) 1.24 (1.18–1.29) 1.42 (1.33–1.52) 1.64 (1.49–1.79)
Sleep assessment
 Self- administered 21 134,427 1.11 (1.06–1.16) 1.06 (1.03–1.10) 1.02 (1.00–1.04) 1.00 1.05 (1.04–1.06) 1.14 (1.13–1.16) 1.26 (1.23–1.29) 1.38 (1.34–1.42)
Interviewer- administered 15 12,403 1.09 (0.97–1.21) 1.05 (0.98–1.13) 1.02 (0.98–1.05) 1.00 1.07 (1.04–1.11) 1.21 (1.12–1.31) 1.37 (1.22–1.54) —
Adjusted for … Education/socioeconomic status
 Yes 27 143,711 1.06 (1.02–1.11) 1.03 (1.01–1.06) 1.01 (0.99–1.02) 1.00 1.09 (1.08–1.11) 1.25 (1.21–1.28) 1.43 (1.37–1.49) 1.64 (1.55–1.74)
 No 9 3,119 1.15 (0.95–1.38) 1.09 (0.96–1.23) 1.04 (0.97–1.10) 1.00 1.03 (0.99–1.07) 1.11 (1.02–1.20) 1.20 (1.06–1.36) —
Smoking
 Yes 28 143,178 1.07 (1.02–1.12) 1.04 (1.01–1.07) 1.01 (0.99–1.02) 1.00 1.10 (1.08–1.11) 1.26 (1.22–1.30) 1.45 (1.38–1.51) 1.66 (1.57–1.77)
 No 8 3,652 1.28 (1.03–1.60) 1.17 (1.01–1.36) 1.07 (1.00–1.16) 1.00 1.02 (0.97–1.06) 1.09 (0.99–1.20) 1.18 (1.02–1.38) —
Alcohol
 Yes 24 56,831 1.08 (1.00–1.16) 1.04 (0.99–1.10) 1.01 (0.98–1.03) 1.00 1.11 (1.09–1.13) 1.29 (1.24–1.34) 1.51 (1.42–1.60) 1.76 (1.63–1.91)
 No 12 89,999 1.12 (.08–1.16) 1.07 (1.04–1.09) 1.02 (1.01–1.03) 1.00 1.02 (1.01–1.03) 1.08 (1.06–1.10) 1.14 (1.11–1.17) 1.20 (1.16–1.24)
Physical activity
 Yes 25 142,638 1.07 (1.03–1.10) 1.04 (1.02–1.06) 1.01 (1.00–1.02) 1.00 1.09 (1.08–1.10) 1.25 (1.21–1.28) 1.42 (1.37–1.48) 1.63 (1.54–1.72)
 No 11 4,192 1.27 (1.01–1.59) 1.17 (1.00–1.35) 1.07 (0.99–1.16) 1.00 1.01 (0.95–1.07) 1.10 (0.98–1.24) 1.22 (1.02–1.46) —
Health statusb
 Yes 10 105,645 1.06 (1.02–1.10) 1.02 (1.00–1.05) 0.99 (0.98–1.00) 1.00 1.09 (1.07–1.11) 1.23 (1.18–1.28) 1.39 (1.31–1.47) 1.57 (1.46–1.69)
 No 26 41,195 1.11 (1.03–1.21) 1.07 (1.01–1.13) 1.03 (1.00–1.05) 1.00 1.06 (1.04–1.08) 1.20 (1.15–1.26) 1.38 (1.29–1.48) 1.59 (1.44–1.75)
Blood pressure
 Yes 22 112,841 1.06 (1.02–1.11) 1.03 (1.01–1.06) 1.01 (1.00–1.02) 1.00 1.06 (1.04–1.08) 1.18 (1.14–1.21) 1.31 (1.25–1.38) 1.47 (1.38–1.57)
 No 14 33,989 1.13 (1.00–1.28) 1.08 (0.99–1.17) 1.03 (0.99–1.07) 1.00 1.07 (1.04–1.10) 1.19 (1.13–1.26) 1.33 (1.23–1.45) —
Body mass index
 Yes 26 142,963 1.06 (1.01–1.11) 1.03 (1.00–1.06) 1.00 (0.99–1.02) 1.00 1.09 (1.08–1.11) 1.25 (1.22–1.29) 1.44 (1.38–1.50) 1.65 (1.56–1.74)
 No 10 3,867 1.27 (1.06–1.52) 1.16 (1.03–1.31) 1.07 (1.00–1.13) 1.00 1.07 (1.02–1.12) 1.30 (1.13–1.50) 1.62 (1.27–2.06) —
Preexisting chronic diseases
 Yesc 32 145,917 1.07 (1.03–1.12) 1.04 (1.01–1.07) 1.01 (0.99–1.02) 1.00 1.09 (1.08–1.10) 1.24 (1.21–1.27) 1.41 (1.37–1.46) 1.61 (1.54–1.69)
 No 4 913 — 1.03 (0.82–1.29) 1.00 (0.88–1.12) 1.00 1.16 (1.07–1.27) 1.44 (1.23–1.69) — —
Sleep disorders/sleeping pills
 Yesd 13 91,999 1.11 (1.06–1.15) 1.07 (1.04–1.10) 1.03 (1.01–1.04) 1.00 1.03 (1.01–1.05) 1.09 (1.05–1.12) 1.15 (1.09–1.21) 1.21 (1.13–1.30)
 No 23 54,831 1.11 (1.03–1.21) 1.07 (1.01–1.13) 1.02 (1.00–1.05) 1.00 1.06 (1.04–1.07) 1.19 (1.15–1.22) 1.33 (1.27–1.40) 1.50 (1.41–1.60)
Depression/mental health
 Yes 15 25,634 1.02 (0.95–1.10) 1.01 (0.96–1.06) 1.00 (0.97–1.02) 1.00 1.11 (1.09–1.14) 1.38 (1.29–1.47) 1.74 (1.56–1.92) 2.18 (1.89–2.52)
 No 21 121,196 1.14 (1.06–1.22) 1.07 (1.03–1.13) 1.02 (0.99–1.04) 1.00 1.11 (1.08–1.13) 1.29 (1.24–1.35) 1.51 (1.42–1.61) 1.77 (1.63–1.93)
Study quality
 7–8 stars 13 50,899 1.17 (1.08–1.26) 1.10 (1.04–1.16) 1.03 (1.01–1.06) 1.00 1.07 (1.05–1.09) 1.18 (1.14–1.22) 1.29 (1.23–1.36) 1.42 (1.33–1.51)
 4–6 stars 23 95,931 1.02 (0.97–1.07) 1.01 (0.97–1.04) 0.99 (0.98–1.01) 1.00 1.10 (1.08–1.12) 1.32 (1.27–1.38) 1.62 (1.51–1.74) 1.98 (1.79–2.18)
Open in a new tab

aN: number of studies (gender specific studies).

bHealth status (self-reported or physical functioning).

cIncludes studies with subjects of no chronic diseases (cardiovascular diseases and cancer) at baseline.

dIncludes studies with subjects who did not take sleeping pills at baseline.

Figure 1. The dose-response analysis between nighttime sleep duration and risk of all-cause mortality.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

The solid line and the long dash line represent the estimated relative risk and its 95% confidence interval.

24-hour sleep duration and all-cause mortality

Table 2 Compared with 7 hours/day, a U-shaped relationship between 24-hour sleep duration and risk of all-cause mortality was found (Pfor non-linearity < 0.001), and the RRs (95% CIs) of all-cause mortality were 1.09 (1.04–1.14), 1.05 (1.02–1.09), 1.02 (1.00–1.03), 1.08 (1.05–1.10), 1.27 (1.20–1.36), 1.53 (1.38–1.70) and 1.84 (1.59–2.13) for 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10 and 11 hours/day of 24-hour sleep (Fig. 2), respectively. There is moderate between-study heterogeneity among study-specific trends, defined by the coefficients of the first (I2 = 51%) and second (I2 = 65%) spline transformations of 24-hour sleep duration. No publication bias was found (P = 0.24). Sensitivity analysis showed that exclusion of any one study did not influence the relationship (all P values for non-linearity <0.001). Among subjects without cancer and cardiovascular diseases at baseline20,22,25, the risks were 1.10 (1.04–1.16), 1.06 (1.02–1.10), 1.03 (1.01–1.04), 1.03 (1.01–1.05), 1.09 (1.04–1.15), 1.17 (1.08–1.27) and 1.25 (1.12–1.40) for 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10 and 11 hours/day, respectively (26,147 death cases among 351,530 participants).

Table 2. Pooled measures on the relation of 24-hour sleep duration and risk of all-cause mortality.
  RR (95% CI) by hours of 24-hour sleep per day
Na Deaths 4 hours 5 hours 6 hours 7 hours 8 hours 9 hours 10 hours 11 hours
Overall 19 101,641 1.09 (1.04–1.14) 1.05 (1.02–1.09) 1.02 (1.00–1.03) 1.00 1.08 (1.05–1.10) 1.27 (1.20–1.36) 1.53 (1.38–1.70) 1.84 (1.59–2.13)
Subjects without cardiovascular diseases and cancer at baseline 4 26,147 1.10 (1.04–1.16) 1.06 (1.02–1.10) 1.03 (1.01–1.04) 1.00 1.03 (1.01–1.05) 1.09 (1.04–1.15) 1.17 (1.08–1.27) 1.25 (1.12–1.40)
Countryb
 Asia 6 14,707 1.01 (0.92–1.11) 1.00 (0.94–1.07) 1.00 (0.96–1.03) 1.00 1.05 (1.03–1.08) 1.15 (1.08–1.22) 1.24 (1.12–1.36) 1.37 (1.20–1.57)
 Europe 7 7,386 — 1.18 (0.97–1.43) 1.08 (0.98–1.19) 1.00 1.01 (0.96–1.06) 1.12 (0.97–1.28) 1.22 (0.97–1.47) 1.37 (0.97–1.95)
 USA 5 70,766 1.07 (1.03–1.11) 1.04 (1.02–1.07) 1.02 (1.00–1.03) 1.00 1.01 (1.00–1.03) 1.03 (1.01–1.06) 1.08 (1.02–1.14) —
Sex
 Men 6 17,462 1.16 (0.99–1.35) 1.10 (0.99–1.22) 1.05 (0.99–1.10) 1.00 1.09 (1.03–1.15) 1.34 (1.12–1.61) 1.66 (1.21–2.27) 2.06 (1.32–3.21)
 Women 8 21,046 1.11 (1.01–1.23) 1.07 (1.00–1.14) 1.02 (0.99–1.06) 1.00 1.09 (1.04–1.15) 1.34 (1.17–1.53) 1.67 (1.34–2.09) 2.09 (1.53–2.85)
 Both 5 63,133 1.06 (1.00–1.13) 1.04 (1.00–1.08) 1.01 (0.99–1.03) 1.00 1.04 (1.02–1.06) 1.14 (1.10–1.18) 1.24 (1.17–1.31) 1.38 (1.27–1.49)
Mean age
 >60 years 11 84,110 1.06 (1.01–1.11) 1.04 (1.00–1.07) 1.01 (1.00–1.03) 1.00 1.06 (1.04–1.08) 1.21 (1.16–1.26) 1.39 (1.30–1.49) 1.60 (1.45–1.76)
 ≤60 years 8 17,531 1.19 (1.06–1.34) 1.12 (1.04–1.21) 1.06 (1.02–1.10) 1.00 1.03 (1.00–1.06) 1.15 (1.07–1.24) 1.30 (1.14–1.48) 1.46 (1.22–1.75)
Follow-up duration
 ≥10 years 11 83,959 1.12 (1.05–1.19) 1.07 (1.03–1.12) 1.03 (1.01–1.05) 1.00 1.03 (1.02–1.05) 1.13 (1.08–1.18) 1.23 (1.14–1.33) 1.35 (1.21–1.50)
 <10 years 8 17,682 1.07 (1.00–1.16) 1.04 (0.99–1.10) 1.01 (0.99–1.04) 1.00 1.07 (1.03–1.11) 1.28 (1.16–1.42) 1.61 (1.33–1.89) 1.95 (1.52–2.48)
Sleep assessment
 Self- administered 15 95,560 1.09 (1.03–1.15) 1.05 (1.01–1.09) 1.02 (1.00–1.04) 1.00 1.07 (1.04–1.09) 1.24 (1.16–1.32) 1.46 (1.31–1.63) 1.72 (1.47–2.00)
 Interviewer- administered 4 6,081 1.11 (1.01–1.22) 1.06 (1.00–1.12) 1.02 (0.99–1.05) 1.00 1.11 (1.05–1.17) 1.40 (1.22–1.60) 1.86 (1.25–2.47) 2.32 (1.70–3.18)
Adjusted for … Education/socioeconomic status
 Yes 17 94,310 1.11 (1.06–1.18) 1.07 (1.03–1.11) 1.03 (1.01–1.04) 1.00 1.07 (1.05–1.09) 1.26 (1.18–1.34) 1.50 (1.35–1.67) 1.79 (1.54–2.08)
 No 2 7,331 1.02 (0.91–1.14) 1.01 (0.94–1.09) 1.00 (0.97–1.04) 1.00 1.04 (0.99–1.09) 1.12 (1.01–1.23) 1.24 (1.05–1.47) —
Smoking
 Yes 18 101,417 1.09 (1.04–1.15) 1.06 (1.02–1.09) 1.02 (1.00–1.04) 1.00 1.08 (1.05–1.10) 1.27 (1.19–1.35) 1.52 (1.37–1.70) 1.83 (1.57–2.13)
 No 1 224 —              
Alcohol
 Yes 18 101,417 1.09 (1.04–1.15) 1.06 (1.02–1.09) 1.02 (1.00–1.04) 1.00 1.08 (1.05–1.10) 1.27 (1.19–1.35) 1.52 (1.37–1.70) 1.83 (1.57–2.13)
 No 1 224 —              
Physical activity
 Yes 17 99,837 1.09 (1.04–1.14) 1.05 (1.02–1.09) 1.02 (1.00–1.03) 1.00 1.08 (1.05–1.10) 1.27 (1.19–1.36) 1.53 (1.36–1.71) 1.83 (1.56–2.15)
 No 2 1,804 1.01 (0.68–1.51) 1.00 (0.78–1.22) 0.99 (0.87–1.13) 1.00 1.12 (0.97–1.29) 1.40 (1.03–1.91) 1.83 (1.10–2.81) 2.27 (1.18–4.37)
Health statusc
 Yes 10 65,418 — 1.03 (0.98–1.08) 1.01 (0.99–1.04) 1.00 1.04 (1.02–1.06) 1.14 (1.09–1.19) 1.27 (1.18–1.38) 1.41 (1.27–1.57)
 No 9 36,223 1.14 (1.06–1.22) 1.08 (1.03–1.14) 1.03 (1.01–1.06) 1.00 1.04 (1.02–1.07) 1.15 (1.09–1.22) 1.27 (1.17–1.39) 1.41 (1.25–1.59)
Blood pressure
 Yes 12 40,558 1.07 (1.01–1.14) 1.04 (1.00–1.08) 1.01 (1.00–1.03) 1.00 1.07 (1.04–1.10) 1.24 (1.16–1.33) 1.46 (1.30–1.64) 1.72 (1.46–2.03)
 No 7 61,083 — 1.09 (1.01–1.17) 1.03 (0.99–1.07) 1.00 1.10 (1.05–1.15) 1.38 (1.20–1.57) 1.78 (1.39–2.20) 2.25 (1.62–3.12)
Body mass index
 Yes 18 101,417 1.09 (1.04–1.15) 1.06 (1.02–1.09) 1.02 (1.00–1.04) 1.00 1.08 (1.05–1.10) 1.27 (1.19v1.35) 1.52 (1.37–1.70) 1.83 (1.57–2.13)
 No 1 224 —              
Preexisting chronic diseases
 Yesd 14 95,152 1.08 (1.04v1.12) 1.04 (1.02–1.07) 1.01 (1.00–1.03) 1.00 1.05 (1.04v1.07) 1.16 (1.12–1.20) 1.29 (1.21–1.37) 1.44 (1.32–1.56)
 No 5 6,489 — 1.16 (0.90–1.50) 1.06 (0.93–1.21) 1.00 1.06 (0.88–1.28) 1.16 (0.81–1.68) — —
Sleep disorders
 Yes 6 8,631 0.97 (0.84–1.13) 0.98 (0.89–1.08) 0.98 (0.94–1.03) 1.00 1.08 (1.03–1.13) 1.23 (1.10–1.37) 1.42 (1.19–1.70) 1.64 (1.27v2.10)
 No 13 93,010 1.13 (1.07–1.19) 1.08 (1.04–1.12) 1.03 (1.01–1.05) 1.00 1.05 (1.03–1.07) 1.17 (1.11–1.23) 1.31 (1.21–1.43) 1.47 (1.31–1.65)
Depression/mental health
 Yes 5 16,675 0.99 (0.92–1.07) 0.99 (0.95–1.04) 1.00 (0.97–1.02) 1.00 1.02 (1.00–1.04) 1.11 (1.06–1.17) 1.23 (1.12–1.35) 1.36 (1.19–1.56)
 No 14 84,966 1.12 (1.06–1.18) 1.07 (1.03–1.11) 1.02 (1.00–1.04) 1.00 1.12 (1.08–1.17) 1.40 (1.26–1.57) 1.76 (1.47–2.10) 2.21 (1.73–2.83)
Study quality
 7–8 stars 10 86,848 1.12 (1.06–1.80) 1.07 (1.03–1.11) 1.03 (1.01–1.05) 1.00 1.06 (1.04–1.08) 1.20 (1.14–1.26) 1.36 (1.25–1.47) 1.54 (1.38–1.73)
 4–6 stars 9 14,793 — 1.03 (0.95–1.12) 1.01 (0.97–1.06) 1.00 1.04 (0.99–1.10) 1.17 (1.02–1.33) 1.32 (1.04–1.67) 1.49 (1.08–2.07)
Open in a new tab

aN: number of studies (gender specific studies).

bthere is a study conduced in Australia.

chealth status (self-reported health status or physical functioning).

dincludes the studies with subjects of no chronic diseases (cardiovascular diseases and cancer) at baseline.

Figure 2. The dose-response analysis between 24-hour sleep duration and risk of all-cause mortality.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

The solid line and the long dash line represent the estimated relative risk and its 95% confidence interval.

Subgroup analysis and meta-regression (Table S3)

Subgroup and meta-regression were conducted to explore possible sources of between-study heterogeneity. In the analysis of nighttime sleep duration and risk of all-cause mortality, follow-up duration, sleep duration assessment method, mean age, sex, continent where the study were conducted, covariates adjusted for and study quality did not contribute to the heterogeneity significantly (all P values > 0.05). In the analysis of 24-hour sleep duration and all-cause mortality, continent where the study were conducted (P = 0.05) and follow-up duration (P = 0.05) might contribute to the heterogeneity, which may be also caused by chance because of the relatively small number of studies. Other factors did not contribute to the heterogeneity significantly (all P values > 0.05).

Discussion

Results from this dose-response meta-analysis showed that, compared with 7 hours/day, sleep duration was associated with the risk of all-cause mortality in a U-shaped manner among adults, regardless of nighttime sleep or 24-hour sleep. Overall, study design, population characteristics and other covariates did not influence the relationship substantially.

Five theoretical pathways for the relationship between short sleep duration and mortality have been put forth32: (I) short sleep directly causes mortality itself; (II) short sleep may result from variety of social, environmental, and physiological changes that lead to increased mortality risk; (III) short sleep itself causes physiological and social outcomes that may lead to increased mortality; (IV) short sleep is associated with other characteristics causally linked to mortality, such as age; and (V) the possibility of reverse causality is also of concern. Proposed mechanisms for mortality associated with long sleep include33: (I) long sleep is linked to increased sleep fragmentation that is associated with a number of negative health outcomes; (II) long sleep is associated with feelings of fatigue and lethargy that may decrease resistance to stress and disease; (III) changes in cytokine levels associated with long sleep increase mortality risk; (IV) long sleepers experience a shorter photoperiod that could increase the risk of death in mammalian species; (V) a lack of physiological challenge with long sleep decrease longevity; (VI) underlying disease processes mediate the relationship between long sleep and mortality. In addition, this meta-analysis suggested that the risk estimations of all-cause mortality associated with longer duration (10 hours and 11 hours) of 24-hour sleep were larger than those of nighttime sleep. The excess risk might be partly attributable to daytime napping that is positively associated with risk of all-cause mortality34.

One major concern with the observed associations is that short and long sleep duration might be just markers of poor health status rather than independent predictors. Among the studies included, a U-shaped association was found among subjects with one or more chronic diseases but no association was found among participants without chronic diseases in the 45 and Up Study22. However, the U-shaped association was found in both subjects with one or more chronic diseases and subjects without chronic diseases in another study25. In addition, no statistical differences in association between sleep duration and all-cause mortality were found in stratified analysis by self-perceived health13,19, and excluding subjects with prevalent chronic diseases made little or no difference to the overall results35,36. Reverse causality is of another concern; however, the included studies found that the associations did not changed substantially after excluding early death occurring within the first 1–5 years of follow-up11,13,14,16,24,27,28,30,31,35,37,38,39. In addition, in this meta-analysis, the U-shaped relationship was also found among subjects without cardiovascular diseases and cancer at baseline. These findings indicated that preexisting chronic diseases might influence but not fully explain the observed associations. Furthermore, the observed associations remained after adjustment for other covariates. Therefore, these results suggested that both long and short sleep duration should be independent predictors of all-cause mortality.

Other factors influencing the observed associations should also be considered. Although no significant interactions between sleep duration and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity and body mass index on all-cause mortality were found in National Institutes of Health -AARP Diet and Health Study28, the U-shaped relationship was mainly observed among subjects with lower levels of physical activity in other studies20,24, and the interaction with body mass index was also found in another study20. In addition, the association of long duration of sleep with all-cause mortality was only observed among subjects taking napping15, and the U-shaped relationship was also more pronounced among subjects who napped daily40. However, the limited data precluded a more detailed analysis in this meta-analysis.

An earlier review found that both short and long duration of sleep are significant predictors of death10. Since the review was published, 19 population-based prospective cohort studies11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29 were also included in this meta-analysis, making it possible to describe the dose-response relationship of sleep duration with risk of all-cause mortality, calculate the risk of all-cause mortality associated with specific duration of sleep, and assess whether other factors influence the association of sleep duration with all-cause mortality.

Other limitations should also be of noteworthy. First, sleep duration was self-reported and, therefore, might be subject to error and misclassification, and participants might also change their sleep pattern during follow-up. Second, while we extracted RRs that reflected the greatest degree of control for potential confounders, the extent to which they were adjusted for and potential residual confounding by other unmeasured factors41,42,43,44,45 should also be considered. In addition, adjustment for potential factors that may be on the biological pathway between sleep duration and mortality risk would result in over adjustment. However, this meta-analysis showed that covariates adjusted for in the original studies did not influence the observed associations substantially. Third, publication bias could be of concern because small studies with null results tend not to be published; however, no publication bias was detected. In spite of the limitations, results from prospective cohort studies are still the best evidence available to assess the longitudinal effect of sleep duration on mortality.

In summary, results from this meta-analysis showed that both short and long sleep duration were independent predictors of all-cause mortality, and 7 hours/day of sleep should be recommended to prevent premature death among adults.

Materials and Methods

Literature search and selection

We performed a literature search up to March 2015 using the databases of Pubmed and Embase, using the following search terms ((((((prospective) OR cohort) OR longitudinal) OR follow-up)) AND ((death) OR mortality)) AND sleep), without restrictions. Moreover, we reviewed the reference lists from retrieved articles to search for further relevant studies. There is no protocol for this meta-analysis.

Two investigators (X.S. and Y.W.) independently reviewed all identified studies, and studies were included if they met the following criteria: (1) a prospective design; (2) the exposure of interest was sleep duration; (3) the outcome of interest was all-cause mortality; (4) relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) for 3 or more categories of sleep duration was provided; (5) the study was conducted among adults. If data were duplicated in more than one study, we included the study with the longest follow-up duration.

Data extraction

The following data were extracted from each study by two investigators (X.S. and Y.W.): publication year, the first author’s last name, country where the study was performed, follow-up duration, total number of participants and death cases, health status of participants at baseline, sleep duration assessment method, variables adjusted for in the analysis, the numbers of death cases and participants (or person-years) and RR estimates with corresponding 95% CI for the each categories of sleep duration. Information was also gained with a request to the corresponding author of original studies17,19. We extracted RRs that reflected the greatest degree of control for potential confounders.

Statistical analysis

The trend from the correlated log RR estimates across levels of sleep duration was computed using a two-stage random-effects dose–response meta-analysis46, taking into account the between-study heterogeneity. In the first stage, the generalised least-square regression was used to estimate a restricted cubic spline model with three knots at the 25th, 50th and 75th percentiles of the levels of sleep duration. Then a multivariate random-effects meta-analysis was adopted to combine the study-specific estimates using the restricted maximum likelihood method. A P value for non-linearity was calculated by testing the null hypothesis that the coefficient of the second spline is equal to 0. This dose-response meta-analysis requires that the number of death cases and participants (or person-years) and RR estimates with corresponding 95% CI for the each categories of sleep duration should be available. The mean level of sleep duration in each category was assigned to the corresponding RR for every study. If the upper boundary of the highest category was not provided, we assumed that the boundary had the same amplitude as the adjacent category. For studies15,20,25,26,39,40,47,48 that did not report the numbers of death cases for each categories of sleep duration, these numbers were inferred based on total numbers of cases and the reported crude risk estimates or risk estimates that were adjusted for least number of covariates49.

Between-study heterogeneity was assessed with I2, and the values of 25%, 50% and 75% represent low, moderate and high heterogeneity50, respectively. Subgroup analysis and meta-regression were conducted to explore potential sources of heterogeneity and perform comparisons between groups, and a permutation test of 1000 was used to obtain P values from meta-regression to control spurious findings51. Publication bias was evaluated using Egger test. A sensitivity analysis was performed with one study removed at a time to assess whether the results could have been affected markedly by a single study. Study quality was assessed using the 9-star Newcastle-Ottawa scale (http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp, accessed 12/21/2015). All statistical analyses were performed with STATA version 12.0 (Stata Corporation, College Station, TX, USA). All reported probabilities (P-values) were two-sided with P < 0.05 considered statistically significant.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Shen, X. et al. Nighttime sleep duration, 24-hour sleep duration and risk of all-cause mortality among adults: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Sci. Rep. 6, 21480; doi: 10.1038/srep21480 (2016).

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Information
srep21480-s1.pdf (198.6KB, pdf)

Footnotes

Author Contributions X.S., Y.W. and D.Z. designed the study. X.S. and Y.W. conducted the literature search. X.S. and Y.W. conducted the data extraction and statistical analysis. X.S. and Y.W. wrote the manuscript. X.S., Y.W. and D.Z. interpreted the results. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

References

  1. Ferrie J. E., Kumari M., Salo P., Singh-Manoux A. & Kivimaki M. Sleep epidemiology–a rapidly growing field. Int J Epidemiol 40, 1431–1437 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Leng Y. et al. Sleep duration and risk of fatal and nonfatal stroke: A prospective study and meta-analysis. Neurology 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001371 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cappuccio F. P., Cooper D., D’Elia L., Strazzullo P. & Miller M. A. Sleep duration predicts cardiovascular outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies. Eur Heart J 32, 1484–1492 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Xi B., He D., Zhang M., Xue J. & Zhou D. Short sleep duration predicts risk of metabolic syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sleep Med Rev 18, 293–297 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Wang Q., Xi B., Liu M., Zhang Y. & Fu M. Short sleep duration is associated with hypertension risk among adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hypertens Res 35, 1012–1018 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Sperry S. D., Scully I. D., Gramzow R. H. & Jorgensen R. S. Sleep Duration and Waist Circumference in Adults: A Meta-Analysis. Sleep 38, 1269–1276 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Wu Y., Zhai L. & Zhang D. Sleep duration and obesity among adults: a meta-analysis of prospective studies. Sleep Med 15, 1456–1462 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Shan Z. et al. Sleep Duration and Risk of Type 2 Diabetes: A Meta-analysis of Prospective Studies. Diabetes Care 38, 529–537 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Lu Y., Tian N., Yin J., Shi Y. & Huang Z. Association between sleep duration and cancer risk: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. PLoS One 8, e74723 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cappuccio F. P., D’Elia L., Strazzullo P. & Miller M. A. Sleep duration and all-cause mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies. Sleep 33, 585–592 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Suzuki E. et al. Sleep duration, sleep quality and cardiovascular disease mortality among the elderly: a population-based cohort study. Prev Med 49, 135–141 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Chien K. L. et al. Habitual sleep duration and insomnia and the risk of cardiovascular events and all-cause death: report from a community-based cohort. Sleep 33, 177–184 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Mesas A. E., Lopez-Garcia E., Leon-Munoz L. M., Guallar-Castillon P. & Rodriguez-Artalejo F. Sleep duration and mortality according to health status in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 58, 1870–1877 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Castro-Costa E. et al. Association between sleep duration and all-cause mortality in old age: 9-year follow-up of the Bambui Cohort Study, Brazil. J Sleep Res 20, 303–310 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Cohen-Mansfield J. & Perach R. Sleep duration, nap habits, and mortality in older persons. Sleep 35, 1003–1009 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Chen H. C., Su T. P. & Chou P. A nine-year follow-up study of sleep patterns and mortality in community-dwelling older adults in Taiwan. Sleep 36, 1187–1198 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Garde A. H., Hansen A. M., Holtermann A., Gyntelberg F. & Suadicani P. Sleep duration and ischemic heart disease and all-cause mortality: prospective cohort study on effects of tranquilizers/hypnotics and perceived stress. Scand J Work Environ Health 39, 550–558 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Jung K. I., Song C. H., Ancoli-Israel S. & Barrett-Connor E. Gender differences in nighttime sleep and daytime napping as predictors of mortality in older adults: the Rancho Bernardo study. Sleep Med 14, 12–19 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kakizaki M. et al. Long sleep duration and cause-specific mortality according to physical function and self-rated health: the Ohsaki Cohort Study. J Sleep Res 22, 209–216 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kim Y. et al. Insufficient and excessive amounts of sleep increase the risk of premature death from cardiovascular and other diseases: the Multiethnic Cohort Study. Prev Med 57, 377–385 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Li Y., Sato Y. & Yamaguchi N. Potential biochemical pathways for the relationship between sleep duration and mortality. Sleep Med 14, 98–104 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Magee C. A., Holliday E. G., Attia J., Kritharides L. & Banks E. Investigation of the relationship between sleep duration, all-cause mortality, and preexisting disease. Sleep Med 14, 591–596 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Yeo Y. et al. A prospective cohort study on the relationship of sleep duration with all-cause and disease-specific mortality in the Korean Multi-center Cancer Cohort study. J Prev Med Public Health 46, 271–281 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Bellavia A., Akerstedt T., Bottai M., Wolk A. & Orsini N. Sleep duration and survival percentiles across categories of physical activity. Am J Epidemiol 179, 484–491 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Cai H. et al. Sleep Duration and Mortality: A Prospective Study of 113 138 Middle-Aged and Elderly Chinese Men and Women. Sleep 38, 529–536 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Hall M. H. et al. Association between Sleep Duration and Mortality Is Mediated by Markers of Inflammation and Health in Older Adults: The Health, Aging and Body Composition Study. Sleep 38, 189–195 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Rod N. H. et al. The joint effect of sleep duration and disturbed sleep on cause-specific mortality: results from the Whitehall II cohort study. PLoS One 9, e91965 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Xiao Q., Keadle S. K., Hollenbeck A. R. & Matthews C. E. Sleep duration and total and cause-specific mortality in a large US cohort: interrelationships with physical activity, sedentary behavior, and body mass index. Am J Epidemiol 180, 997–1006 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Zuurbier L. A. et al. Fragmentation and stability of circadian activity rhythms predict mortality: the Rotterdam study. Am J Epidemiol 181, 54–63 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Ikehara S. et al. Association of sleep duration with mortality from cardiovascular disease and other causes for Japanese men and women: the JACC study. Sleep 32, 295–301 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Amagai Y. et al. Sleep duration and mortality in Japan: the Jichi Medical School Cohort Study. J Epidemiol 14, 124–128 (2004). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Grandner M. A., Hale L., Moore M. & Patel N. P. Mortality associated with short sleep duration: The evidence, the possible mechanisms, and the future. Sleep Med Rev 14, 191–203 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Grandner M. A. & Drummond S. P. Who are the long sleepers? Towards an understanding of the mortality relationship. Sleep Med Rev 11, 341–360 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Yamada T., Hara K., Shojima N., Yamauchi T. & Kadowaki T. Daytime Napping and the Risk of Cardiovascular Disease and All-Cause Mortality: A Prospective Study and Dose-Response Meta-Analysis. Sleep 38, 1945–1953 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Kojima M. et al. Sleep patterns and total mortality: a 12-year follow-up study in Japan. J Epidemiol 10, 87–93 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Heslop P., Smith G. D., Metcalfe C., Macleod J. & Hart C. Sleep duration and mortality: The effect of short or long sleep duration on cardiovascular and all-cause mortality in working men and women. Sleep Med 3, 305–314 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Patel S. R. et al. A prospective study of sleep duration and mortality risk in women. Sleep 27, 440–444 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Tsubono Y., Fukao A. & Hisamichi S. Health practices and mortality in a rural Japanese population. Tohoku J Exp Med 171, 339–348 (1993). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Lan T. Y., Lan T. H., Wen C. P., Lin Y. H. & Chuang Y. L. Nighttime sleep, Chinese afternoon nap, and mortality in the elderly. Sleep 30, 1105–1110 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Stone K. L. et al. Self-reported sleep and nap habits and risk of mortality in a large cohort of older women. J Am Geriatr Soc 57, 604–611 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Lof M., Sandin S., Yin L., Adami H. O. & Weiderpass E. Prospective study of coffee consumption and all-cause, cancer, and cardiovascular mortality in Swedish women. Eur J Epidemiol 30, 1027–1034 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. O’Doherty M. G. et al. Repeated measures of body mass index and C-reactive protein in relation to all-cause mortality and cardiovascular disease: results from the consortium on health and ageing network of cohorts in Europe and the United States (CHANCES). Eur J Epidemiol 29, 887–897 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Roswall N. et al. Adherence to the healthy Nordic food index and total and cause-specific mortality among Swedish women. Eur J Epidemiol 30, 509–517 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Holtermann A., Mork P. J. & Nilsen T. I. Hours lying down per day and mortality from all-causes and cardiovascular disease: the HUNT Study, Norway. Eur J Epidemiol 29, 559–565 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Clough-Gorr K. M., Egger M. & Spoerri A. A Swiss paradox? Higher income inequality of municipalities is associated with lower mortality in Switzerland. Eur J Epidemiol 30, 627–636 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Orsini N., Li R., Wolk A., Khudyakov P. & Spiegelman D. Meta-analysis for linear and nonlinear dose-response relations: examples, an evaluation of approximations, and software. Am J Epidemiol 175, 66–73 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Kripke D. F., Garfinkel L., Wingard D. L., Klauber M. R. & Marler M. R. Mortality associated with sleep duration and insomnia. Arch Gen Psychiatry 59, 131–136 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Mallon L., Broman J. E. & Hetta J. Sleep complaints predict coronary artery disease mortality in males: a 12-year follow-up study of a middle-aged Swedish population. J Intern Med 251, 207–216 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Bekkering G. E. et al. How much of the data published in observational studies of the association between diet and prostate or bladder cancer is usable for meta-analysis? Am J Epidemiol 167, 1017–1026 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Higgins J. P., Thompson S. G., Deeks J. J. & Altman D. G. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 327, 557–560 (2003). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Higgins J. P. & Thompson S. G. Controlling the risk of spurious findings from meta-regression. Stat Med 23, 1663–1682 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information
srep21480-s1.pdf (198.6KB, pdf)

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES