Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2016 Feb 22;6:21527. doi: 10.1038/srep21527

Droplet Breakup in Expansion-contraction Microchannels

Pingan Zhu 1,2, Tiantian Kong 1,2, Leyan Lei 1,2, Xiaowei Tian 1,2, Zhanxiao Kang 1,2, Liqiu Wang 1,2,a
PMCID: PMC4761913  PMID: 26899018

Abstract

We investigate the influences of expansion-contraction microchannels on droplet breakup in capillary microfluidic devices. With variations in channel dimension, local shear stresses at the injection nozzle and focusing orifice vary, significantly impacting flow behavior including droplet breakup locations and breakup modes. We observe transition of droplet breakup location from focusing orifice to injection nozzle, and three distinct types of recently-reported tip-multi-breaking modes. By balancing local shear stresses and interfacial tension effects, we determine the critical condition for breakup location transition, and characterize the tip-multi-breaking mode quantitatively. In addition, we identify the mechanism responsible for the periodic oscillation of inner fluid tip in tip-multi-breaking mode. Our results offer fundamental understanding of two-phase flow behaviors in expansion-contraction microstructures, and would benefit droplet generation, manipulation and design of microfluidic devices.


In microfluidic channels, droplets are generated by injecting a liquid phase into another immiscible liquid. Drops break off from an orifice when shearing force and surface tension are balanced1. Assuming constant shearing force from outer phase, droplets with uniform sizes are generated one by one in a dripping manner. Attributed to the precise control of flow, the monodisperse, and size-controlled droplets generated by droplet microfluidics are extensively used for wide applications, ranging from foods2, pharmaceuticals3,4, cosmetics5 to materials synthesis6,7,8,9. These droplets can function as micro-reactors for chemical reactions10,11 and biological assays12,13,14 such as single-molecule polymerase chain reaction (PCR)15, or as carriers for active ingredients such as drugs16,17, proteins18 and cells19. Typically, as micro-reactors or carriers, droplets are merged in diverging channels to initiate chemical reactions20,21, or squeezed through narrow channels to probe the mechanical property of encapsulated protein networks18,22 and microcapsules23,24, or split into several daughter droplets25,26 for different biological assays12,13. Thus, channels with complex geometry are normally designed to facilitate manipulation of droplets, including mixing, splitting, diluting and fission20,21,25,26,27. Controlling the dynamical behaviors of individual droplets in complex channels is thus crucial for droplet-based applications11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21.

The geometry of microchannels, like expansions and contractions where flow velocity changes with the varying channel dimension, affects droplet behavior significantly. For example, the increase in flow velocity due to channel contraction increases the shearing force, leading to early breakup of the droplet from inner phase24. An inappropriate design in channel geometry can cause undesired droplet behaviors. For instance, when droplets are used as drug carriers in small vessels, these droplets should not split until arriving at the targeted site28. Moreover, as a large droplet is squeezed through a narrow channel, it may break into multiple daughter droplets in an uncontrolled manner29,30. This uncontrolled breakup of primary droplet significantly jeopardizes the uniformity of final droplets. Consequently, it is highly desired to systematically investigate and quantify the conditions of droplet breakup in complex channels, especially where expansions and contractions in channel dimensions are involved.

When injected into an immiscible outer fluid, the inner liquid can break up in different modes, including geometry-controlled31, dripping7,32,33, jetting7, tipstreaming34,35,36 and tip-multi-breaking37. The variation in channel geometry results in the transition between breakup modes, and thus changes the size and size distribution of final droplets. For instance, the increase of droplet size and a transition from dripping to geometry-controlled mode are observed, when the distance between two capillaries in flow-focusing capillary devices is increased38. Although quantified relationship between channel geometry and the size of final droplets is well studied for geometry-controlled, dripping, jetting and tipstreaming modes7,36,39, it is yet to be established for the recently reported tip-multi-breaking mode37, by which droplets are generated sequence by sequence with non-uniform size.

We investigate systematically the features of droplet breakup in capillary microfluidic devices with expansion-contraction configurations (Fig. 1a). The influences of varying channel geometry on flow behaviors are studied at the injection nozzle with diverging flow and at the focusing orifice with converging flow. Using local capillary numbers, we characterize the influences by conditions of droplet breakup, such as the location shift of droplet breakup and breakup mode transition. At the injection nozzle, we demonstrate that the local capillary number successfully predicts the condition for breakup location transition. At the focusing orifice, we highlight the transition of droplet breakup modes, and quantify both droplet size and number of droplets in the tip-multi-breaking mode37 (Fig. 1b). We also examine the mechanism responsible for evolution of inner liquid tip and the oscillation period of the tip. Our understanding of droplet breakup behavior influenced by the channel geometry, offers valuable guidelines for designing microchannels to generate and manipulate droplets in a precisely controlled manner.

Figure 1. Device used and the influences of channel dimension on flow behaviors.

Figure 1

(a) Schematic of the microcapillary device (not to scale). Inline graphic, outer diameter of the injection nozzle; Inline graphic, inner diameter of the focusing orifice; L, distance between two orifices; and Inline graphic, inner dimension of the square capillary. Both inner and outer fluids flow from left to right, and the gutter between the cylindrical and square capillary at right hand-side is sealed during operation (yellow region) to enhance flow focusing, but open at rest, so as to flush out wastes. (b) Droplets produced sequence by sequence in tip-multi-breaking mode with descending size distribution. (b1) 2-droplet sequence, (b2) 4-droplet sequence, (b3) 6-droplet sequence and (b4) 8-droplet sequence. (c) Geometrical parameters characterizing the expansion-contraction microchannel. Inline graphic, maximum diameter of the liquid tip; Inline graphic, contraction distance; Inline graphic, diameter of inner liquid tip at the focusing orifice. Inline graphic and Inline graphic represent the length of contraction and expansion region, respectively. (d) Variation of inner fluid tip shape with enlarging orifice distance L. Inline graphic, Inline graphic. Inline graphic, Inline graphic. (d1) Cone-shape tip with Inline graphic, (d2) spindle-shape tip with Inline graphic, and (d3,d4) droplet breakup at injection nozzle with Inline graphic. Time interval between (d3,d4) is 50 ms. Scale bars, 200 μm.

Experiments

Capillary microfluidic devices were used to study the hydrodynamic behaviors of two-phase flows in microchannel with an expansion-contraction structure. The capillary microfluidic device was fabricated by aligning two tapered cylindrical glass capillaries inside a square capillary (inner dimension Inline graphic), as shown in Fig. 1a. We varied three geometrical parameters Inline graphic, Inline graphic and L systematically, which were outer diameter of the injection nozzle, inner diameter of the focusing orifice, and distance between the two orifices, respectively. We summarized the combinations of geometrical parameters in Table 1. Three dynamic dimensions (Fig. 1c), the maximum diameter of inner liquid tip Inline graphic, inner tip diameter at the focusing orifice Inline graphic and the axial distance between the maximum inner tip and focusing orifice Inline graphic, depend on both geometrical parameters Inline graphic, Inline graphic and L and the dynamic flow process (inner and outer flow rates Qin and Qout, respectively). The length of contraction, where flow converges, is represented by Inline graphic; while that of the expansion, where flow diverges, is represented by Inline graphic (Fig. 1c).

Table 1. Eighteen cases tested with different device geometries.

Case Number Di (μm) Df (μm) L(μm) Case Number Di (μm) Df (μm) L(μm)
A 86 258 97–714 K 147 242 806
B 186 258 197–1100 L 147 242 267
C 203 258 119–1136 M 147 242 570
D 217 258 130–1284 N 147 242 150
E 186 150 126–1166 O 147 176 272
F 186 210 146–1094 P 73 242 270
G 186 353 155–1038 Q 208 242 265
H 265 155 1208–1654 L 147 197 409
I 305 155 163–1410        
J 305 258 192–1263        

Cases A–J, with various combinations of Di and Df, are conducted to investigate the condition for the location shift of droplet breakup from focusing orifice to injection nozzle. For each case from A to J, the orifice distance L is variable, starting from an initial value comparable to the diameter of injection nozzle Di, ending with the value when droplet breakup occurs at the injection nozzle. The range of L for each case from A to J can also be found in Fig. 3. Cases K–Q are used to characterize the influence of device geometry on tip-multi-breaking mode. Different combinations of Di, Df and L are studied. Case L is used to develop the correlation between the oscillation period T and the capillary number Cafocus in tip-multi-breaking mode. The capillary number Cafocus ranges from 0.15 to 0.45 in our experiments.

Both inner and outer fluids were injected into the microcapillary device from left to right, Fig. 1a. The flow rates for inner (Qin) and outer (Qout) phases were controlled by syringe pumps (Longer Pump). Qin was experimentally confirmed to be constant with various orifice distance L (see “confirming constant inner flow rate” in supplementary information). The gutter between the cylindrical and square capillary at right hand side was sealed (yellow region in Fig. 1a) during operation, so as to enhance the flow contraction at the focusing orifice. The flow is visualized, monitored and recorded (images and videos) by a high-speed digital camera (MotionPro® X4, IDT, Taiwan, and Phantom M110) equipped with an inverted microscope (XD101, Nanjing Jiangnan Novel Optics Co. Ltd, and Nikon TS100). Captured images and videos were analyzed by ImageJ.

The fluid employed in experiments was water-in-oil two-phase flow, where the outer phase was silicone oil with fixed viscosity ηout, and inner phase were various glycerol-water mixtures with different values of viscosity ηin (see supplementary Table S1). The mixture of 70 wt.% glycerol and 30 wt.% distilled water was used as inner phase fluid for most of the experiments, except that of determining the condition for the transition of droplet breakup location as a function of viscosity ratio ξ (defined as ξ = ηin/ηout). The viscosity was measured by a viscometer (microVISCTM, RheoSense, Inc.). ηout = 492.9 ± 6.9 mPa s for silicone oil, and ηin = 19.07 ± 0.12 mPa s for 70 wt.% glycerol (ξ = 0.039). The interfacial tension was measured by a ring tensiometer (Surface Tensiometer 20, Cole-Parmer) to be γ = 30.07 mN m−1 without any surfactants.

Results and Discussion

Influences of channel dimension on flow behaviors

The influence of channel geometry is manifested in the two local shear stresses at the injection nozzle and focusing orifice, respectively. Qualitatively, small value of L renders shear stress strong at the focusing orifice, but weak at the injection nozzle. When fluid flows in a channel with short distance L, the sharp contrast in local stresses leads to a cone-shape tip (Fig. 1d1). Droplets are generated at the focusing orifice where channel converges. With increasing L, the decreased difference in local stresses results in a spindle-shape tip (Fig. 1d2). However, if L increases further, the inner fluid tip is likely to break up at the injection nozzle where channel diverges (Fig. 1d3,d4). Therefore, the breakup location shifts from the focusing orifice to injection nozzle. Meanwhile, the detached drop from the injection nozzle would break up again into multiple daughter droplets with non-uniform size as it is squeezed into the focusing orifice (Fig. 1d3,d4, see supplementary movie S1). To produce uniform droplets, breakup at injection nozzle should thus be avoided.

The variation in local shear stresses influences droplet breakup mode as well as droplet size distribution. As local shear stresses vary, the capillary number Ca, representing the ratio of shear stresses to surface tension, also changes. For instance, decrease of local capillary number at the focusing orifice by enlarging L leads to a transition from dipping to geometry-controlled mode, as observed by Benson et al.38 and in the present work. Interestingly, we also found the variation of tip-multi-breaking mode with L (Fig. 2, see supplementary movie S2). Tip-multi-breaking mode was previously reported with descending size distribution in one droplet train37 (Figs 1b and 2a). Here we find that the size distribution in one drop sequence can either keep constant for a while and then decrease (“constant-decreasing”, Fig. 2b), or increase first, then keep constant and finally decrease (“increasing-constant-decreasing”, Fig. 2c), depending on the orifice distance L.

Figure 2. Effects of channel dimension on size distribution in tip-multi-breaking mode.

Figure 2

All images are obtained with Inline graphic, Inline graphic, Inline graphic and Inline graphic. (a) Droplet sequence with descending sizes in one droplet train. Inline graphic. Inset: magnification of the droplet sequence. (b) Droplet size firstly keeps constant for dozens of milliseconds, and then deceases with time (“constant-decreasing”). Inline graphic. (c) Droplet size increases first, then keeps constant for a while, and finally decreases with time (“increasing-constant-decreasing”). Inline graphic. See supplementary movie S2 for details. Scale bars, 200 μm.

Figure 3 maps various flow behaviors in Plane (L, lc). The cone-shape and spindle-shape tips are separated by lc/L = 1. Breakup at the focusing orifice lies above the boundary of lc = 0.5 L, while breakup at the injection nozzle is constrained by lc < 0.5 L. To understand this phase map, we introduce a ratio of the representative length for expansion Inline graphic to that for contraction Inline graphic, Inline graphic, which increases with L. The larger Inline graphic corresponds to stronger diverging flow but weaker converging flow. Initially, Inline graphic for small values of L, indicating a converging flow at the focusing orifice without diverging. As such, shear stress at the focusing orifice is large enough to drag the inner tip into cone-shape, featured by Inline graphic (Fig. 3). As Inline graphic, the flow first diverges and then converges, so the tip of inner flow is spindle-shape, represented by Inline graphic in Fig. 3. In the range of Inline graphic, droplet breakup occurs at the focusing orifice, and transitions of droplet breakup mode can be observed with an increase in L. When diverging flow magnifies further with the increase of L, droplet breaks up at the injection nozzle with Inline graphic. Therefore, the boundary for the transition of breakup location from focusing orifice to injection nozzle reads Inline graphic, which results in Inline graphic (Fig. 3).

Figure 3. Phase diagram showing flow behaviors influenced by channel dimension.

Figure 3

Inline graphic represents cone-shape tip, while the region of Inline graphic indicates the spindle-shape tip. Inline graphic marks the transition of droplet breakup location from focusing orifice to injection nozzle. Different symbol colors represent different cases (Table 1). Different symbol shapes distinguish flow behaviors, where square denotes cone-shape tip, circle is for spindle-shape tip, and triangle means breakup at injection nozzle. The phase diagram is obtained with Inline graphic and Inline graphic. Insets: snapshots of cone-shape tip, spindle-shape tip and breakup at focusing orifice and injection nozzle, respectively.

Condition for the transition of droplet breakup location

To determine the condition for breakup location shifting from the focusing orifice to injection nozzle, we exploit the local capillary number at the injection nozzle in the form of Inline graphic, with Fs and Fγ being the total shear forces and capillary forces, respectively. Firstly, we estimate Fs exerted on the inner fluid tip based on a modified Stokes’ drag32,40,41,

graphic file with name srep21527-m24.jpg

where Inline graphic is the characteristic diameter of inner liquid tip, Inline graphic is viscosity ratio, and Inline graphic is the mean velocity of outer fluid at the injection nozzle. Capillary forces are evaluated as32,41

graphic file with name srep21527-m28.jpg

Thus, the local capillary number at the injection nozzle is

graphic file with name srep21527-m29.jpg

where Inline graphic is the ratio of cross-sectional area of the injection nozzle to that of the square capillary. Droplet breakup at the injection nozzle occurs only when Inline graphic exceeds a critical value Inline graphic. Eq. (3) indicates that Inline graphic increases with increasing L, so Inline graphic implies a critical L for the transition to occur. The critical L depends on fluid properties, channel dimensions, and flow rates.

Now we determine the critical L triggering the breakup at the injection nozzle based on Eq. (3). The dynamic dimension Inline graphic is found to be proportional to orifice distance L (see supplementary Fig. S1), thereby it is reasonable to estimate Inline graphic. Assuming constant Inline graphic, Inline graphic, Inline graphic, Inline graphic and Inline graphic in Eq. (3), we have Inline graphic. Therefore, the condition for droplet breakup at the injection nozzle, Inline graphic, leads to

graphic file with name srep21527-m44.jpg

Eq. (4) shows that the condition is represented as the ratio of orifice distance L to the outer diameter of the injection nozzle Di, Inline graphic, which decreases linearly with Inline graphic. We confirm this relation experimentally as the solid line in Fig. 4a.

Figure 4. Condition for the transition of droplet breakup location.

Figure 4

(a) Critical Inline graphic for breakup at injection nozzle as a function of Inline graphic. Solid line represents the condition of Inline graphic from Eq. (4) where Inline graphic, while dashed line denotes Inline graphic as an estimate under the assumption of Inline graphic with Inline graphic. For the same α, several values of Df are tested (see supplementary Fig. S2). Triangle represents breakup at injection nozzle, while circle denotes breakup at focusing orifice. Data are obtained with viscosity ratio Inline graphic. (b) Plot of Inline graphic as a function of viscosity ratio Inline graphic. The black solid curve is obtained from Eq. (7) based on the result of Guillot et al.42, while the red dashed curve is estimated from Tomotika46 (see “determining the most unstable mode of a viscous jet” in supplementary information). Experimental results show better agreement with solid-curve estimation. Since the dashed-curve is taken under the circumstance of unbounded quasi-static flow, while solid-curve considers device confinement and flow rates, the difference in the two estimates reveals the significance of channel confinement and flow rates in affecting confined droplet breakup.

In subsequent analysis, we examine the analytic solution for condition Inline graphic, which can be achieved by taking all the influencing parameters into consideration and making a quantitative estimation of Inline graphic. Practically, Inline graphic is much smaller than unity, (for example Inline graphic gives Inline graphic), so we assume that Inline graphic is small enough to assume Inline graphic in the following analysis. According to Rayleigh-Plateau instability, the most unstable mode for the jet breakup gives Inline graphic42,43, where Inline graphic is the wave number with wavelength approximated as Inline graphic in our case. Inline graphic is the unperturbed jet radius and estimated as Inline graphic, which is the average radius of the injection nozzle and the maximum tip. Replacing k and Inline graphic by Inline graphic, Inline graphic and L, we get,

graphic file with name srep21527-m62.jpg

Eq. (5) provides an accurate estimation of the relation between Inline graphic and L compared with the previous simplified one Inline graphic. Since breakup at the injection nozzle occurs when Inline graphic, the following relation is achieved by rewriting Eq. (3) with the assumption of Inline graphic,

graphic file with name srep21527-m67.jpg

Solving Eqs. (5) and (6) together, Inline graphic is finally obtained in the following form

graphic file with name srep21527-m69.jpg

with Inline graphic, and Inline graphic.

Eq. (7) is achieved under two assumptions: Inline graphic, and neglecting the influence of focusing orifice (Inline graphic). Our experimental results validate these assumptions. For experimental cases with Inline graphic (guaranteeing Inline graphic) but different Inline graphic values, the critical condition Inline graphic basically keeps constant as Inline graphic (dashed line in Fig. 4a, also see supplementary Fig. S2), independent of Inline graphic. However, a determination of Inline graphic is necessary to predict Inline graphic theoretically.

As presented by Erb et al.32, a Inline graphic value of 0.1 is accurate enough to predict the condition for droplet breakup over a wide range of viscosity ratios. We thus plot Inline graphic as a function of Inline graphic by using Inline graphic. The other parameters involved are Inline graphic, Inline graphic, Inline graphic, Inline graphic, respectively. As shown in Fig. 4b, the prediction (solid line) agrees well with experimental results when viscosity ratio varies over three orders of magnitude.

Characteristics of tip-multi-breaking mode

Having determined the condition for droplet breakup at the injection nozzle, we now turn our attention to breakup at the focusing orifice. According to Taylor44, we define outer phase capillary number as Inline graphic locally at the focusing orifice, where Inline graphic is the strain rate represented by the velocity gradient along the flow direction. Inline graphic is estimated as the difference between the average flow velocity at the focusing orifice, Inline graphic, and that at the maximum tip diameter, Inline graphic, which yields Inline graphic in the following form

graphic file with name srep21527-m96.jpg

As contraction length Inline graphic increases, capillary number Inline graphic decreases, indicating a weaker external shear stress. Since increasing distance L results in larger contraction length Inline graphic (Fig. 3), capillary number Inline graphic decreases with L. Eq. (8) thus accounts for the transition from dripping to geometry-controlled mode by increasing L. Next, we use Inline graphic to quantify the droplet breakup in tip-multi-breaking mode at the focusing orifice.

Droplet sizes vary with local capillary number. For dripping, a scaling law45 suggests Inline graphic, with Ca being capillary number, R being droplet radius, and h being channel dimension. However, for tip-multi-breaking mode, such a scaling cannot hold, because droplet sizes are not uniform even for the same capillary number (Fig. 2). In this case, droplet size should be normalized by a dynamic length scale instead of a static one. In tip-multi-breaking mode, force balance between shear stress and surface tension gives Inline graphic, where Rdrop and rtip are radii of the droplet and tip neck, respectively. If the characteristic velocity Inline graphic is approximated as Inline graphic by considering geometry parameters, then the force balance gives Inline graphic with Rdrop and rtip replaced by Ddrop and dtip. Finally, we arrive at a scaling law,

graphic file with name srep21527-m107.jpg

Eq. (9) provides a scaling for tip-multi-breaking in a form similar to Inline graphic, but different in that droplet diameter Ddrop is scaled by a dynamic length dtip, rather than the static channel dimension h. This scaling is confirmed to agree with the experimental data very well, as shown in Fig. 5a. For a droplet sequence with polydisperse droplets (Fig. 2), Inline graphic equals constant due to the same capillary number Inline graphic. So the non-uniformity of the droplets is interpreted by the change of inner tip diameter dtip. For example, descending size distribution of tip-multi-breaking mode in Fig. 2a is the result of Inline graphic thinning monotonically with time during the formation of one droplet sequence. Likewise, different size distributions in Fig. 2b,c are attributed to the different ways in which Inline graphic alters with time.

Figure 5. Characteristics of tip-multi-breaking mode.

Figure 5

(a) Log-log plot of droplet size as a function of local capillary number Cafocus. Experimental data collapse onto a fitted line of Inline graphic. (b) Outer phase capillary number Cafocus showing a linear relation to common ratio a. (c) Plot of capillary number Cafocus versus droplet number n. Dashed line shows the estimation of Inline graphic (Inline graphic), which gives a fair prediction when Inline graphic, and the larger the value of n is, the smaller the deviation becomes. Different symbols denote different cases (Table 1).

Apart from influencing droplet size distribution in tip-multi-breaking mode, capillary number Inline graphic affects the number of droplets in the sequence as well. Here, we focus only on the droplet sequence with descending size distribution, as shown in Fig. 2a. Previously, we found that droplet number n qualitatively increases with capillary number Inline graphic37. Now, to obtain a quantitative relationship between n and Inline graphic, it is necessary to summarize here some fundamental results from ref. 37. First, the individual droplet size in one droplet sequence constitutes a geometrical progression, with common factor being a. Second, common factor a and droplet number n are related as

graphic file with name srep21527-m116.jpg

If a and Inline graphic are related, then the relation between n and Inline graphic would finally be obtained based on Eq. (10). Experimentally, common ratio a is found to increase linearly with Inline graphic, Inline graphic (Fig. 5b). Then, by assuming Inline graphic (Inline graphic is a constant), we get

graphic file with name srep21527-m123.jpg

When constant Inline graphic fits as Inline graphic, experimental data basically collapse around the prediction given by Eq. (11) (Fig. 5c). The discrepancy between the prediction and experimental data gets smaller and smaller when n grows. In fact, Inline graphic varies smoothly, while n are discrete natural numbers (n > 1). So for every single n, there should be a narrow range rather than only one value of Inline graphic, as displayed in Fig. 5c. Based on Eq. (11) droplet train with prescribed droplet number can be tuned on-demand by varying the matching capillary number, for instance by changing outer phase flow rate. These droplet sequences may have potential applications in materials science, for example, in designing new barcode emulsions and particles with multiple cores of different sizes and numbers.

Oscillation of the inner liquid tip

The periodic oscillation of the tip features tip-multi-breaking mode. We show the evolution of dtip for three types of tip behaviors, descending, constant-decreasing, and increasing-constant-decreasing in Fig. 6a–c, respectively, from experimental data. To quantify the variation of outer-fluid viscous stress during the dtip evolution, we define its local capillary number Catip by Catip = 4ηoutQout/[π(Df2dtip2)γ] (ηout = 492.9 mPa s, Qout = 3.5 mL h−1, Df = 210 μm and γ = 30.07 mN m−1 in our experiments) at the focusing orifice, and plot the temporal variation of Catip in Fig. 6a–c. Due to the penetration of inner tip into the focusing orifice (see supplementary movie S2), a dtip-increasing stage occurs at the very beginning of its evolution (white areas in the insets in Fig. 6a–c). No droplet is generated at this initial tip-growing stage because of the low viscous shear from the outer fluid. Afterwards, the droplet-generation takes place as the shear stress is large enough (cyan, gray and yellow areas in the insets in Fig. 6a–c). During the time period of droplet generation, the droplet size, dtip and Catip all vary in the form of descending (Fig. 6a), constant-decreasing (Fig. 6b), or increasing-constant-decreasing (Fig. 6c) as L increases.

Figure 6. Oscillation of inner liquid tip.

Figure 6

(ac) Evolutions of nondimensional tip diameter dtip/Df (red) and capillary number Catip (black) at the focusing orifice in tip-multi-breaking mode. Df = 210 μm. (a) Descending behavior of dtip/Df and Catip measured from Fig. 2a with L = 372.7 μm, and period T = 160 ms. (b) Constant-decreasing behavior of dtip/Df and Catip measured from Fig. 2b with L = 537.5 μm, and period T = 456 ms. (c) Increasing-constant-decreasing behavior of dtip/Df and Catip measured from Fig. 2c with L = 919.6 μm, and period T = 834 ms. The insets in (ac) display the magnifications of tip evolution and temporal variation of Catip. Since no droplet is generated during the initial period of increasing tip diameter (white area), we focus on the later stages of tip-diameter increasing (cyan area), constant tip-diameter (gray area) and tip-diameter decreasing (yellow area) where droplets are generated in (a–c). (d) Schematic of the control volume of the inner liquid tip confined by the left injection nozzle and right focusing orifice. pin and pout are pressures at the focusing orifice for inner and outer phases, respectively, while pno is the inner fluid pressure at the injection nozzle. (e) Log-log plot of oscillation period T versus inner fluid flow rate Qin, with Qout = 1.5 mL h−1. Inset: snapshot of a droplet-sequence generation. Scale bar, 200 μm. (f) Transition boundary of tip-multi-breaking mode in Qout-Qin plane; data adapted from ref. 37. (g) Minimum oscillation period Ts versus capillary number Cafocus. (h) Log-log plot of oscillation period T versus Orifice distance L for fixed inner and outer flow rates. Qin = 4.5 μL h−1, Qout = 3 mL h−1. The device used in (e,g,h) is case L with geometrical dimension shown in Table 1.

Although the flow rates of both inner and outer fluids, the density-weighted area average of local flow field, are kept constant by syringe pumps, the local flow field can be unsteady around the focusing orifice, which induces the oscillation of the inner-fluid tip (Fig. 6a–c). To isolate the mechanism responsible for the tip oscillation, consider the normal stresses balance across the liquid-liquid interface40 at the focusing orifice (Fig. 6d):

graphic file with name srep21527-m128.jpg

where p is pressure, Inline graphic and Inline graphic are, respectively, the outer and inner viscous stresses normal to the interface, κ is twice the mean curvature of the interface, estimated as 2/dtip at the focusing orifice. Because the viscosity ratio is much smaller than unity (Inline graphic), Inline graphic is negligible compared with Inline graphic. At fixed flow condition (Qin, Qout and L are constant for every single case in Fig. 6a–c), pout and Inline graphic can be assumed to be invariant during the tip thinning. Therefore, according to Eq. (12), pin increases with the shrinkage of dtip, for which κ is increased. When pin is sufficiently large to compete with the pressure at the nozzle pno (Fig. 6d), the inner tip is pushed upstream out of the focusing orifice. After recoiling, the tip is inflated by the inner fluid flow again and penetrates into the focusing orifice once it is large enough. The variation in inner pressure pin is thus responsible for the tip oscillation. Further studies are needed to quantify this force analysis by experimentally measuring local pressure and flow fields inside microchannels, which is beyond our current capability of experiments.

The three distinct types of tip oscillation (Fig. 6a–c) correspond to different values of L. Eq. (12) accounts for this L-dependent behavior of dtip. Qin and Qout are held constant in Fig. 6a–c, so that pin and pout can be assumed as constant at the maxima of dtip. With enlarging L, the reduction in Inline graphic leads to a decrease in the mean curvature κ. Consequently, as κ = 2/dtip, the maxima of dtip increases with L, as confirmed experimentally in Fig. 6a–c. For the largest L in Fig. 6c, the tip needs the longest time to fully develop into its maximal diameter dtip after penetrating into the focusing orifice. An increasing stage of dtip is therefore identified (cyan area in the inset in Fig. 6c). Afterwards, dtip is temporarily stabilized (gray area) because of the transient mass balance of mass in and out from the tip (Fig. 6d), followed by the necking thinning (yellow area) due to inner fluid drainage (see supplementary Fig. S3 for experimental confirmation). Due to different time required for the tip to be fully developed, intermediate L in Fig. 6b holds dtip constant for a while before tip thinning (inset in Fig. 6b), whereas the case with the smallest L in Fig. 6a has dtip diminishing immediately once the tip diameter approaches the peak (inset in Fig. 6a).

We now show the variation of tip oscillation period T with inner flow rate Qin, outer capillary number Cafocus, and orifice distance L. In determining the relationship between T and Qin, Qout and L are fixed as constant. Since droplet sequence is fixed by Cafocus, in this case, the volume Vs of one droplet sequence is invariant when Qin varies. Thus, mass conservation, Qin = Vs/T, suggests that T is inversely proportional to Qin, verified by experiments in Fig. 6e. As Qout changes, there is a smallest oscillation period Ts corresponding to the largest Qin that enables the occurrence of tip-multi-breaking mode (Fig. 6f), as found in ref. 37. We show variation of Ts with Cafocus in Fig. 6g where Ts is experimentally measured on the transition boundary between the tip-multi-breaking mode and the others shown in Fig. 6f. It shows that, for capillary number below 0.35, Ts increases linearly with Cafocus. For Cafocus above 0.35, Ts is however essentially independent of capillary number, and fluctuates around 224 ms in our experiments. This is due to the volume reduction of the tip as Cafocus increases (see supplementary Fig. S4 for details). With both Qin and Qout fixed, an increase in L increases the tip volume Vt (dashed box in Fig. 6d) because Vt~LDl2~L3. As the volume Vs of one droplet sequence is proportional to the tip volume Vt, Vs~Vt~L3; the mass conservation Qin = Vs/T leads to T~Vs~L3 when Qin is kept constant. This is experimentally confirmed in Fig. 6h.

Concluding Remarks

In conclusion, we have systematically studied the influence of expansion-contraction geometry on droplet breakup in capillary microfluidic devices, which we separate into two parts: at the injection nozzle where flow diverges, and at the focusing orifice where flow converges. We demonstrate that the variation of expansion-contraction dimension, tuned by orifice distance L, affects two local shear stresses at the focusing and injection orifices, and thus significantly influences the flow behavior. These influences include changes of droplet breakup location and breakup mode. At the injection nozzle, we derive a condition of critical L for breakup location transition by balancing local shear and capillary forces. Similarly, at the focusing orifice, we determine the local capillary number as a ratio of shear stresses to capillary effects, and quantify its relation to the size and number of droplets in tip-multi-breaking mode. The force balance on the liquid-liquid interface at the focusing orifice provides physical insight into the dynamical behavior of the tip oscillation. We have also experimentally examined the variation of the tip oscillation period with inner fluid flow, outer phase capillary number and orifice distance. Beyond the capillary devices used in this work, we expect our results to be also applicable to other two-phase microsystems involving expansion-contraction structures. Such fundamental understanding of droplet breakup in microfluidics involving expansion-contraction geometries would be useful in droplet generation, manipulation, and microfluidic device design.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Zhu, P. et al. Droplet Breakup in Expansion-contraction Microchannels. Sci. Rep. 6, 21527; doi: 10.1038/srep21527 (2016).

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Movie 1
Download video file (2.8MB, mov)
Supplementary Movie 2
Download video file (7.3MB, mov)
Supplementary Information
srep21527-s3.pdf (1MB, pdf)

Acknowledgments

The financial support from the Research Grants Council of Hong Kong (GRF17211115, GRF17207914, GRF HKU717613E and HKU71811E) and the University of Hong Kong (URC 201511159108, 201411159074 and 201311159187) is gratefully acknowledged. The work is also supported in part by the Zhejiang Provincial, Hangzhou Municipal and Lin’an County Governments.

Footnotes

Author Contributions P.Z., T.K. and L.W. designed the project. P.Z., L.L., X.T. and Z.K. performed the experiments. P.Z. analyzed the data. P.Z., T.K. and L.W. wrote the manuscript. L.W. supervised the study. All authors commented on the paper.

References

  1. Baroud C. N., Gallaire F. & Dangla R. Dynamics of microfluidic droplets. Lab Chip 10, 2032–2045 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Augustin M. A. & Hemar Y. Nano-and micro-structured assemblies for encapsulation of food ingredients. Chem. Soc. Rev. 38, 902–912 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Whitesides G. M. The origins and the future of microfluidics. Nature 442, 368–373 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Haber C. Microfluidics in commercial applications; an industry perspective. Lab Chip 6, 1118–1121 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Patravale V. & Mandawgade S. Novel cosmetic delivery systems: an application update. Int. J. Cosmetic Sci. 30, 19–33 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kim J. H. et al. Droplet microfluidics for producing functional microparticles. Langmuir 30, 1473–1488 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Nunes J., Tsai S., Wan J. & Stone H. Dripping and jetting in microfluidic multiphase flows applied to particle and fibre synthesis. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 46, 114002 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Qiu Y. et al. Microfluidic-based fabrication, characterization and magnetic functionalization of microparticles with novel internal anisotropic structure. Sci. Rep. 5, 10.1038/srep13060 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Wang W., Zhang M.-J. & Chu L.-Y. Functional polymeric microparticles engineered from controllable microfluidic emulsions. Acc. Chem. Res. 47, 373–384 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Demello A. J. Control and detection of chemical reactions in microfluidic systems. Nature 442, 394–402 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Song H., Chen D. L. & Ismagilov R. F. Reactions in droplets in microfluidic channels. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 45, 7336–7356 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Dittrich P. S. & Manz A. Lab-on-a-chip: microfluidics in drug discovery. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 5, 210–218 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kim S. H., Shim J. W. & Yang S. M. Microfluidic multicolor encoding of microspheres with nanoscopic surface complexity for multiplex immunoassays. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 50, 1171–1174 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Yuan J., Zhao X., Wang X. & Gu Z. Image decoding of photonic crystal beads array in the microfluidic chip for multiplex assays. Sci. Rep. 4, 10.1038/srep06755 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Nakano M. et al. Single-molecule PCR using water-in-oil emulsion. J. Biotechnol. 102, 117–124 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Khan I. U. et al. Microfluidic conceived pH sensitive core–shell particles for dual drug delivery. Int. J. Pharm. 478, 78–87 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Zhao C.-X. Multiphase flow microfluidics for the production of single or multiple emulsions for drug delivery. Adv. Drug Deliver. Rev. 65, 1420–1446 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Evans H. M. et al. In situ formation, manipulation, and imaging of droplet-encapsulated fibrin networks. Lab Chip 9, 1933–1941 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Chan H. F. et al. Rapid formation of multicellular spheroids in double-emulsion droplets with controllable microenvironment. Sci. Rep. 3, 10.1038/srep03462 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Zhang Y. X. & Wang L. Q. Microfluidics: Fabrication, Droplets, Bubbles and Nanofluids Synthesis. (Springer, 2011). [Google Scholar]
  21. Tan Y.-C., Fisher J. S., Lee A. I., Cristini V. & Lee A. P. Design of microfluidic channel geometries for the control of droplet volume, chemical concentration, and sorting. Lab Chip 4, 292–298 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Seemann R., Brinkmann M., Pfohl T. & Herminghaus S. Droplet based microfluidics. Rep. Prog. Phys. 75, 016601 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Kong T. T., Wang L. Q., Wyss H. M. & Shum H. C. Capillary micromechanics for core–shell particles. Soft matter 10, 3271–3276 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Abbaspourrad A., Carroll N. J., Kim S. H. & Weitz D. A. Polymer microcapsules with programmable active release. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 7744–7750 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Link D., Anna S. L., Weitz D. & Stone H. Geometrically mediated breakup of drops in microfluidic devices. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 054503 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Zhang Y. X. & Wang L. Q. Nanoliter-droplet breakup in confined T-shaped junctions. Curr. Nanosci. 7, 471–479 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  27. Khoshmanesh K. et al. A multi-functional bubble-based microfluidic system. Sci. Rep. 5, 10.1038/srep09942 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Chen H., Li J., Shum H. C., Stone H. A. & Weitz D. A. Breakup of double emulsions in constrictions. Soft Matter 7, 2345–2347 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  29. Bordoloi A. D. & Longmire E. K. Drop motion through a confining orifice. J. Fluid Mech. 759, 520–545 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  30. Choi J.-H., Lee S.-K., Lim J.-M., Yang S.-M. & Yi G.-R. Designed pneumatic valve actuators for controlled droplet breakup and generation. Lab Chip 10, 456–461 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. De Menech M., Garstecki P., Jousse F. & Stone H. Transition from squeezing to dripping in a microfluidic T-shaped junction. J. Fluid Mech. 595, 141–161 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  32. Erb R. M., Obrist D., Chen P. W., Studer J. & Studart A. R. Predicting sizes of droplets made by microfluidic flow-induced dripping. Soft Matter 7, 8757–8761 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  33. Kong T. T., Liu Z., Song Y., Wang L. Q. & Shum H. C. Engineering polymeric composite particles by emulsion-templating: thermodynamics versus kinetics. Soft Matter 9, 9780–9784 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  34. Jeong W.-C. et al. Controlled generation of submicron emulsion droplets via highly stable tip-streaming mode in microfluidic devices. Lab Chip 12, 1446–1453 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Anna S. L. & Mayer H. C. Microscale tipstreaming in a microfluidic flow focusing device. Phys. Fluids 18, 121512 (2006). [Google Scholar]
  36. Lee W., Walker L. M. & Anna S. L. Role of geometry and fluid properties in droplet and thread formation processes in planar flow focusing. Phys. Fluids 21, 032103 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  37. Zhu P. A., Kong T. T., Kang Z. X., Tian X. W. & Wang L. Q. Tip-multi-breaking in capillary microfluidic devices. Sci. Rep. 5, 10.1038/srep11102 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Benson B. R., Stone H. A. & Prud’homme R. K. An “off-the-shelf” capillary microfluidic device that enables tuning of the droplet breakup regime at constant flow rates. Lab Chip 13, 4507–4511 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Christopher G. & Anna S. Microfluidic methods for generating continuous droplet streams. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 40, R319 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  40. Batchelor G. An Introduction to Fluid Dynamics. (Cambridge University Press, 1967). [Google Scholar]
  41. Umbanhowar P., Prasad V. & Weitz D. Monodisperse emulsion generation via drop break off in a coflowing stream. Langmuir 16, 347–351 (2000). [Google Scholar]
  42. Guillot P., Colin A., Utada A. S. & Ajdari A. Stability of a jet in confined pressure-driven biphasic flows at low Reynolds numbers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 104502 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Eggers J. & Villermaux E. Physics of liquid jets. Rep. Prog. Phys. 71, 036601 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  44. Taylor G. The formation of emulsions in definable fields of flow. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 146, 501–523 (1934). [Google Scholar]
  45. Thorsen T., Roberts R. W., Arnold F. H. & Quake S. R. Dynamic pattern formation in a vesicle-generating microfluidic device. Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 4163 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Tomotika S. On the instability of a cylindrical thread of a viscous liquid surrounded by another viscous fluid. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 150, 322–337 (1935). [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Movie 1
Download video file (2.8MB, mov)
Supplementary Movie 2
Download video file (7.3MB, mov)
Supplementary Information
srep21527-s3.pdf (1MB, pdf)

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES