Abstract
Objective
To use Monte Carlo simulation to assess the uncertainty and variability of tobacco consumption through wastewater analysis in a city.
Methods
A total of 11 wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) (serving 2.2 million people; approximately 83% of urban population in Dalian) were selected and sampled. By detection and quantification of principal metabolites of nicotine, cotinine (COT) and trans-3′-hydroxycotinine (OH-COT), in raw wastewater, back calculation of tobacco use in the population of WWTPs can be realised.
Results
COT and OH-COT were detected in the entire set of samples with an average concentration of 2.33±0.30 and 2.76±0.91 µg/L, respectively. The mass load of absorbed NIC during the sampling period ranged from 0.25 to 4.22 mg/day/capita with an average of 1.92 mg/day/capita. Using these data, we estimated that smokers in the sampling area consumed an average of 14.6 cigarettes per day for active smoker. Uncertainty and variability analysis by Monte Carlo simulation were used to refine this estimate: the procedure concluded that smokers in Dalian smoked between 10 and 27 cigarettes per day. This estimate showed good agreement with estimates from epidemiological research.
Conclusions
Sewage-based epidemiology may be a useful additional tool for the large-scale monitoring of patterns of tobacco use. Probabilistic methods can be used to strengthen the reliability of estimated use generated from wastewater analysis.
Keywords: wastewater analysis, Monte Carlo simulation, cotinine, trans-3’-hydroxycotinine, tobacco use
Strengths and limitations of this study.
This paper describes a probabilistic method to assess the uncertainty of tobacco use based on wastewater analysis.
The approach offers a model to estimate tobacco consumption in a city.
The main limitation to this study is that sewage-based epidemiology gives no information on demographic characteristics of smokers.
Introduction
China is the largest consumer of tobacco in the world, with an estimated 301 million smokers in 2010.1 The average cigarette consumption per smoker has remained relatively consistent during this century (estimated at 14.8 cigarettes per day (CPD) in 2002, and 14.2 CPD in 2010).2 3 In May 2015, the Chinese Government approved an increase in the tax applied to tobacco products, however, more tobacco control programmes and initiatives are needed to reduce the smoking.4 Monitoring tobacco consumption is essential for evaluating the effectiveness of tobacco control programmes and initiatives.
Cross-sectional household surveys are the main sources of cross-sectional smoking prevalence estimates. The reliability of these estimates relies on large representative samples of the population providing accurate information about their use of tobacco. These methods are labour-intensive and time-consuming.5 In part, to overcome these issues, a new method of sewage epidemiology based on wastewater analysis has been developed to investigate tobacco consumption. The approach is based on the principle that the metabolites of nicotine (NIC) are excreted along with urine into the urban sewer networks. By the detection and quantification of the principal metabolites—cotinine (COT) and trans-3′-hydroxycotinine (OH-COT)—in raw wastewater, back calculation of tobacco use in the population of a wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) catchment area can be estimated. Such wastewater analysis procedures have been used to estimate tobacco consumption in several cities in Spain6 and Italy.7 The results show good agreement with prevalence data from national epidemiological surveys, and demonstrate the potential of the approach to complement existing socioepidemiological methods.8
The primary advantages of sewage epidemiology procedures are that they provide evidence-based, objective and real-time estimates of drug consumption in a defined population.9–17 However, this approach is also subject to a number of uncertainties associated with the different steps involved.11 18 19 The key uncertainties are those related to the sampling of wastewater,20 21 the chemical analysis,22 the method to back-calculate tobacco use, the estimation of the size of the population,23–25 and human urinary excretion of metabolites.16 26 27 Gaussian error propagation has become widely used to calculate the uncertainty of estimations generated.11 19 28 However, this approach analyses the uncertainty of average values of estimation, not the variability of the estimation itself. As a representative of probabilistic approach, Monte Carlo simulations can quantify model inputs in an estimation model, and therefore assess the variability and uncertainty of tobacco consumption. The objectives of the present study were to assess tobacco consumption using wastewater analyses in a region of China, and to use Monte Carlo simulations to estimate the uncertainties of the estimation of tobacco consumption generated.
Methods
Wastewater sampling and analysis
WWTPs were selected for sampling to achieve a wide geographical distribution in Dalian, China. In total, 11 plants were included, servicing a population of 2.2 million people. All 11 plants operated with the secondary wastewater treatment systems, such as biological aerated filter, cyclic active sludge technology, sequencing batch reactor, and anoxic/oxic activated sludge process. Twenty-four-hour composite samples of raw wastewater were collected in polyethylene terephthalate containers by the staff of each plant on two consecutive weekdays in June 2015. A previous study suggested that the concentrations of COT and OH-COT were consistent between weekdays and weekends.7 Each WWTP also provided information on special events that occurring during the sampling period, flow variations (as measured by a flow sensor in the inlet of the WWTP), sampling mode, and sampling frequency. The population served by each WWTP was estimated using statistical data from the government.
A solid-phase extraction with reverse-phase cartridges was applied for the cleanup of the wastewater sample. Liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry was then used to analyse the samples. The details of sample treatment, analysis (see online supplementary table S1), and chemicals used in this study can be found in the supporting information.
Back-calculation of NIC and tobacco consumption
The per cent of COT and OH-COT excreted, the molecular weight ratio between NIC and the metabolites, the flow rate, and the population served, were used to calculate the mass load of NIC consumed in each WWTP per day (mNIC), as summarised in equation 1.
1 |
where, CCOT and COH-COT are the concentrations of COT and OH-COT, F the flow rate of raw wastewater in WWTPs, MNIC, MCOT and MOH-COT the molecular weights of NIC, COT, and OH-COT, xCOT and xOH-COT the excretion percentage of COT and OH-COT relative to NIC (%).
The average of the amount of NIC consumed (mNIC_Mean) was calculated by multiplying each mass load estimate by the population-equivalent weight (equation 2).
2 |
where mNIC,i is mass load of WWTP of i, WP,i the population-equivalent weight for WWTP of i, and n the number of the WWTPs from 1 to 11.
The population-equivalent weight for each WWTP was calculated based on the population served and total population for all 11 WWTPs (equation 3).
3 |
where Pi is the population served by the WWTP of i, and the total population from 11 WWTPs.
From an epidemiological and public health perspective, a desirable goal would be to estimate the number of cigarettes consumed per smoker rather than the net mass of NIC within a community. Recognising this, the number of cigarettes consumed per smoker (nC) was calculated using equation 4.
4 |
where D is the content of NIC in an average cigarette, Y the average yield of NIC uptake during smoking, R15 the ratio of population aged 15 years and older (15+) in Dalian and xSmoker the smoker ratio (15+) in China. D was estimated at 0.90±0.15 mg of NIC per cigarette sold in Chinese market. The value of Y was determined to be 0.66±0.19 (based on the amount measured for that cigarette brand by standard Federal Trade Commission method and metabolites of NIC in urine29). The values of 91% and 24% for R15 and xSmoker were used to calculate the number of cigarettes smoked per smoker.
Urinary excretion profile of NIC
Studies of NIC metabolism have been conducted over several decades. Many studies have reported excretory profiles of NIC administered through smoking, oral ingestion and transdermal administration.30–38 The analysis of compiled data suggests that the urinary excretion profile is quite similar when NIC is either administered through smoking or transdermal patches; however, the oral ingestion has higher extraction rates of OH-COT and COT (see online supplementary table S2). The main elements of the excretory profile of NIC are the NIC metabolites COT and OH-COT (and their conjugated forms), and NIC itself.39 The conjugated forms of these metabolites are completely transformed to the free form by β-glucuronidase enzymes from faecal bacteria in the raw wastewater.7 Therefore, the total amount (per cent of free and conjugated forms) of OH-COT and COT accounts for 43.4±13.8% and 32.3±8.0% of the total amount of NIC equivalents excreted when smoking is the main route of NIC administration. These mean excretion percentages were used to calculate the mass of NIC consumed.
Uncertainty analysis
The calculated estimates of tobacco consumption are based on the average values of the input parameters. However, their implementations are complicated since the parameters cannot be treated as fixed-point values: each parameter may take on a range of values depending on if the actual values are uncertain (eg, concentrations of COT and OH-COT), or if they vary from person to person (eg, excretion percentage of COT and OH-COT). The most effective quantification method for uncertainty and variability is to assign to each parameter a probability density function. The Monte Carlo approach (Oracle Crystal Ball software, V.7.3.1) allows the possibility of describing the uncertainty and variability associated with the input parameters, and incorporating them into the estimate of tobacco consumption.
Selecting appropriate input distributions for uncertain and variable inputs is crucial to the integrity of Monte Carlo simulation results. These distributions of density functions can take on several different forms (eg, normal, lognormal, uniform, triangular). Normal distribution can be used to represent a quantity for which the underlying mechanism can be described by the central limit theorem, such as the result of a large number of additive independent errors. In this study, we assumed the flow rates, population, the content of NIC in cigarettes and the yield of NIC uptake during smoking were normal distributions, with a conservative estimate of 10% relative SD. The central limit theorem can also be used as the basis for selecting a lognormal distribution to represent a quantity. The lognormal distribution has often been found to be a good representation of positive real values and results from the production of many random variation of the dilution of pollutant concentrations. As such, the concentrations and excretion percentage of COT and OH-COT were taken as lognormal distributions. Online supplementary tables S3 and S4 show the description of the parameter distributions for Monte Carlo simulations.
Sensitivity analysis shows how much each input parameter contributes to the uncertainty or variability of the estimations. In turn, it adds information on which portion of the variability is from natural fluctuation versus how much is caused by lack of knowledge. The contribution of an assumption to the total variance of the forecast is obtained as the square of the correlation coefficient normalised to the sum of the squared correlation coefficients (adjusted to 100%).
Results and discussion
Concentrations in wastewater
NIC, COT and OH-COT were detected in all 22 samples with average concentrations of 11.5±8.73, 2.33±0.30 and 2.76±0.91 µg/L (table 1), respectively. As expected, OH-COT concentrations were approximately 1.2 times higher than those of COT, in concordance with the known metabolic fate of NIC in humans (approximately 1.3 times). These values were highly correlated (R2=0.90). The concentrations measured in the samples collected on 11 WWTPs were very similar and stable, as expected. By contrast, parent NIC concentrations were higher than expected considering only urinary excretion, and showed variability across the different WWTPs. Cigarette butts and ash contribute to the amount of NIC in wastewater, suggesting that the human metabolites of COT and OH-COT are the best biomarkers for estimating tobacco consumption. NIC concentrations did not correlated well with either COT (R2=0.69) or OH-COT (R2=0.72).
Table 1.
WWTPs | Population (×104) | Flow rate (×104 m3/day) | COH-COT (μg/L) | CCOT (μg/L) | CNIC (μg/L) | Mass load (mg/day/capita) | Cigarette number (cigarettes/day/smoker) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MYI | 35 | 10 | 2.97±0.32 | 2.52±0.32 | 15.9±5.47 | 1.82 | 13.8 |
MER | 25 | 8.15 | 2.99±0.33 | 2.55±0.32 | 6.81±5.84 | 2.10 | 15.9 |
LSH | 22 | 5.5 | 2.04±0.21 | 1.76±0.16 | 4.77±1.21 | 1.10 | 8.4 |
FJZ | 10 | 0.7 | 1.57±0.79 | 1.47±0.63 | 10.2±9.25 | 0.25 | 1.9 |
LHT | 27 | 8 | 2.30±0.14 | 1.79±0.07 | 3.88±1.10 | 1.40 | 10.7 |
QSH | 19.5 | 3.4 | 3.50±0.10 | 3.56±0.65 | 18.6±8.29 | 1.44 | 10.9 |
SEG | 20 | 8 | 3.51±0.05 | 3.06±0.23 | 13.5±1.99 | 3.06 | 23.2 |
CYI | 18.8 | 8 | 2.09±0.66 | 1.35±0.80 | 7.77±7.15 | 1.69 | 12.9 |
CER | 28.2 | 12 | 3.22±0.30 | 2.97±0.06 | 14.7±0.62 | 3.07 | 23.3 |
HTX | 8.1 | 2.5 | 1.77±0.28 | 1.03±0.22 | 0.67±0.74 | 1.00 | 7.6 |
XJH | 6.5 | 3 | 4.36±0.83 | 3.51±0.62 | 29.2±3.17 | 4.22 | 32.0 |
COT, cotinine; NIC, nicotine; OH-COT, hydroxycotinine; WWTP, wastewater treatment plant.
These concentrations are in the same range of those measured by Lopes et al40 in Lisbon, Portugal (1.1–3.5 µg/L for COT) and slightly higher than those reported by Rodríguez-Álvarez et al6 in Spain (2.2–5.9, 1.0–1.6 and 1.8–2.8 µg/L for NIC, COT and OH-COT, respectively). The concentrations can be influenced by many factors, such as tobacco prevalence and flows arriving to the WWTPs.
Mass load of NIC consumed and uncertain analysis
The mass load of absorbed NIC during the sampling period ranges from 0.25 to 4.22 mg/day/capita, with an average of 1.92 mg/day/capita (table 1). The mass load of NIC consumed, reported in this work, are similar than those reported in Spain (1.8 mg/day/capita), and lower than in Italy (3.42 mg/day/capita). These differences in the mass load of NIC consumed may be explained by the underlying differences in tobacco consumption.
Figure 1 shows the probability distribution density of the NIC mass load in Dalian generated by the Monte Carlo simulations. The figure shows the 10th centile, the central tendency of consumption (50th centile) and the reasonable maximum mass load (90th centile). The value of mNIC_Mean was estimated to be 2.04 mg/day/capita, ranging from 1.56 to 2.39 mg/day/capita in Dalian. The results reveal that the uncertainty of mass load, as defined by the ratio of the 90th–10th centile, is 1.5.
Figure 2 shows the sensitivity analysis for mNIC_Mean and the eight most significant variables influencing mass load (>1%). The two most significant parameters influencing mass load were xCOT and xOH-COT, which contribute 52% and 31% of total uncertainty of mass load, respectively. By contrast, population, flow rate, and concentration combined only contribute 17% of the observed variance. In this analysis, it can be seen that variability of extraction percentage are far more important than the uncertainty about population, flow rate, and concentration to overall variance in mass load. The variability of extraction percentage for smokers refers to interindividual heterogeneity with respect to different extraction rates of OH-COT and COT. The mechanisms underlying these differences of urinary of NIC metabolites likely involve both genetic and behavioural factors.41 Variability is an inherent property of a system under study and, therefore, is irreducible. While the uncertainty of population, flow rate and concentration due to random or systematic error in measurement can be reduced with better data and/or better models. The main uncertainty of estimation results originates from the interindividual variability, which cannot be reduced through improving the measurement technique.
Consumption of tobacco and uncertain analysis
Given that mean value of 0.90 mg/cigarette of NIC content in the Chinese market, and 66% yield of NIC uptake, we estimated an average of 3.0 cigarettes/day/capita across Dalian. Assuming that 24% of population (15+) in China are active smokers, and 91% of population in Dalian are adults (15+), our procedure estimates that the average Dalian smoker consumed 14.6 CPD. This compares well with survey estimates of population smoking. The 2010 Global Adult Tobacco Survey found that adult Chinese smokers consumed, on average, 14.2 manufactured CPD.3 Similarly, a 2009 smoking prevalence investigation among urban residents of Liaoning province—which includes Dalian—found that the smokers consumed, on average, 14.2±0.3 CPD.42 Hence, the smoking rate obtained from sewage analysis shows good agreement with the smoking rate estimated from epidemiological survey data.
The probability distribution density for consumed number of cigarettes per smoker in Dalian is shown in figure 3. Since this estimation is calculated as the product of several probability distributions, the mass load distribution shown in figure 3 is approximately lognormal. The estimated cigarette consumption ranged from 10 to 27 CPD, with a median of 16 CPD. The uncertainty and variability of number of cigarettes was estimated as 2.0. The probability distribution of daily cigarette consumption is consistent with the questionnaire review from Jiangsu Province in 2010, which showed the median number of cigarettes consumed per day was 15, and ranged from 10 to 20 for the 25th and 75th centiles.43
The sensitivity analysis for number of cigarettes smoked shows that the four parameters of Y, D, xOH-COT and xCOT contributed to 63%, 20%, 9% and 5% of variance, respectively (figure 4). The contribution of the other parameter is lower than 1%. The content of NIC in one cigarette is the most important parameter than other factors, which contribute to almost half the total uncertainty. Owing to interindividual heterogeneity of three parameters of Y, xOH-COT and xCOT, further study on improving estimating of the true values of D should be done to reduce the uncertainty of estimation for cigarette consumption.
In summary, the present study provides a systematic assessment of tobacco use in a city based on sewage epidemiology. Generally, the estimated tobacco consumption agrees quite well with those derived from a separate epidemiology survey. Monte Carlo simulation shows that the uncertainty of mass load and cigarette number are 1.5 and 2.0. The results of sensitivity analysis show that the interindividual variability plays an important role on uncertainty of estimation results. These data are the first published estimates generated using this tool for tobacco consumption in a Chinese city. Although sewage epidemiology has some major strengths, it is not without limitations. This approach gives no information on demographic characteristics of smokers. As such, it is unlikely that such an approach could entirely replace traditional epidemiological sampling.
Further work is required to develop new techniques to reduce the uncertainty of consumption. Sewage epidemiology is a potential approach to estimate consumption of NIC, and could complement conventional socioepidemiological surveys, particularly when it comes to the real-time monitoring of the impact of new tobacco control policies.
Acknowledgments
The authors are thankful for the discussion with Dr Lian-Zheng Yu from the Department of Noncommunicable Chronic Disease Prevention, Liaoning Center for Disease Control and Prevention, and Dr Lin-Ke, Ge from National Marine Environmental Monitoring Center.
Footnotes
Contributors: D-GW designed whole study and wrote the paper. Q-QD and JD pretreated the samples. SY collected the samples. Y-JZ designed the model. G-SN analysed the samples. SGF provided input on nicotine metabolism and revised the paper. ZW and TZ revised the draft paper.
Funding: This study was supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, Open Fund by Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Environment Monitoring and Pollution Control (KHK1309), A Project Funded by the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD), Open Project of State Key Laboratory of Urban Water Resource and Environment, Harbin Institute of Technology (QAK201503), and The National Science Foundation of China (grant numbers 41476084 and 21577029).
Competing interests: None declared.
Patient consent: Obtained.
Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Data sharing statement: No additional data are available.
References
- 1.Li Q, Hsia J, Yang G. Prevalence of smoking in China in 2010. N Engl J Med 2011;364:2469–70. 10.1056/NEJMc1102459 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Sung HY, Wang L, Jin S et al. . Economic burden of smoking in China, 2000. Tob Control 2006;15(Suppl 1):i5–11. 10.1136/tc.2005.015412 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.WHO. Global Adult Tobacco Survey (GATS) China 2010 Country Report. Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Wang JB, Jiang Y, Wei WQ et al. . Estimation of cancer incidence and mortality attributable to smoking in China. Cancer Causes Control 2010;21:959–65. 10.1007/s10552-010-9523-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Gartner C. Flushing out smoking: measuring population tobacco use via wastewater analysis. Tob Control 2015;24:1–2. 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051844 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Rodríguez-Álvarez T, Rodil R, Rico M et al. . Assessment of local tobacco consumption by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry sewage analysis of nicotine and its metabolites, cotinine and trans-3’-hydroxycotinine, after enzymatic deconjugation. Anal Chem 2014;86:10274–81. 10.1021/ac503330c [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Castiglioni S, Senta I, Borsotti A et al. . A novel approach for monitoring tobacco use in local communities by wastewater analysis. Tob Control 2015;24:38–42. 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051553 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Reid MJ, Langford KH, Grung M et al. . Estimation of cocaine consumption in the community: a critical comparison of the results from three complimentary techniques. BMJ Open 2012;2:1–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Li J, Hou L, Du P et al. . Estimation of amphetamine and methamphetamine uses in Beijing through sewage-based analysis. Sci Total Environ 2014;490:724–32. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.05.042 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Du P, Li K, Li J et al. . Methamphetamine and ketamine use in major Chinese cities, a nationwide reconnaissance through sewage-based epidemiology. Water Res 2015;84:76–84. 10.1016/j.watres.2015.07.025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Castiglioni S, Bijlsma L, Covaci A et al. . Evaluation of uncertainties associated with the determination of community drug use through the measurement of sewage drug biomarkers. Environ Sci Technol 2013;47:1452–60. 10.1021/es302722f [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Reid MJ, Langford KH, Mørland J et al. . Quantitative assessment of time dependent drug-use trends by the analysis of drugs and related metabolites in raw sewage. Drug Alcohol Depend 2011;119:179–86. 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2011.06.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.van Nuijs ALN, Castiglioni S, Tarcomnicu I et al. . Illicit drug consumption estimations derived from wastewater analysis: a critical review. Sci Total Environ 2011;409:3564–77. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.05.030 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.van Nuijs ALN, Mougel J-F, Tarcomnicu I et al. . Sewage epidemiology—a real-time approach to estimate the consumption of illicit drugs in Brussels, Belgium. Environ Int 2011;37:612–21. 10.1016/j.envint.2010.12.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Postigo C, Lopez de Alda MJ, Barceló D. Analysis of drugs of abuse and their human metabolites in water by LC-MS2: a non-intrusive tool for drug abuse estimation at the community level. TrAC Trends Anal Chem 2008;27:1053–69. 10.1016/j.trac.2008.10.002 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ort C, van Nuijs AL, Berset JD et al. . Spatial differences and temporal changes in illicit drug use in Europe quantified by wastewater analysis. Addiction 2014;109:1338–52. 10.1111/add.12570 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Thomas KV, Bijlsma L, Castiglioni S et al. . Comparing illicit drug use in 19 European cities through sewage analysis. Sci Total Environ 2012;432:432–9. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.06.069 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Lai FY, Ort C, Gartner C et al. . Refining the estimation of illicit drug consumptions from wastewater analysis: co-analysis of prescription pharmaceuticals and uncertainty assessment. Water Res 2011;45:4437–48. 10.1016/j.watres.2011.05.042 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Mathieu C, Rieckermann J, Berset JD et al. . Assessment of total uncertainty in cocaine and benzoylecgonine wastewater load measurements. Water Res 2011;45:6650–60. 10.1016/j.watres.2011.09.049 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Ort C, Eppler JM, Scheidegger A et al. . Challenges of surveying wastewater drug loads of small populations and generalizable aspects on optimizing monitoring design. Addiction 2014;109:472–81. 10.1111/add.12405 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Ort C, Lawrence MG, Rieckermann J et al. . Sampling for pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) and illicit drugs in wastewater systems: are your conclusions valid? A critical review. Environ Sci Technol 2010;44:6024–35. 10.1021/es100779n [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Thai PK, Jiang G, Gernjak W et al. . Effects of sewer conditions on the degradation of selected illicit drug residues in wastewater. Water Res 2014;48:538–47. 10.1016/j.watres.2013.10.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Chen C, Kostakis C, Gerber JP et al. . Towards finding a population biomarker for wastewater epidemiology studies. Sci Total Environ 2014;487:621–8. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.11.075 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Daughton CG. Real-time estimation of small-area populations with human biomarkers in sewage. Sci Total Environ 2012;414:6–21. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.11.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Lai FY, Anuj S, Bruno R et al. . Systematic and day-to-day effects of chemical-derived population estimates on wastewater-based drug epidemiology. Environ Sci Technol 2015;49:999–1008. 10.1021/es503474d [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Khan U, Nicell JA. Refined sewer epidemiology mass balances and their application to heroin, cocaine and ecstasy. Environ Int 2011;37:1236–52. 10.1016/j.envint.2011.05.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Khan U, Nicell JA. Sewer epidemiology mass balances for assessing the illicit use of methamphetamine, amphetamine and tetrahydrocannabinol. Sci Total Environ 2012;421-422:144–62. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.01.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Brewer AJ, Ort C, Banta-Green CJ et al. . Normalized diurnal and between-day trends in illicit and legal drug loads that account for changes in population. Environ Sci Technol 2012;46:8305–14. 10.1021/es202447r [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.St.Charles FK, Kabbani AA, Borgerding MF. Estimating tar and nicotine exposure: human smoking versus machine generated smoke yields. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 2010;56:100–10. 10.1016/j.yrtph.2009.08.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Byrd GD, Chang KM, Greene JM et al. . Evidence for urinary excretion of glucuronide conjugates of nicotine, cotinine, and trans-3′-hydroxycotinine in smokers. Drug Metab Dispos 1992;20:192–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Gunilla A, Gunilla B, Margareta C. Oral mucosal changes and nicotine disposition in users of Swedish smokeless tobacco products: a comparative study. J Oral Pathol Med 1994;23:161–7. 10.1111/j.1600-0714.1994.tb01106.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Byrd GD, Robinson JH, Caldwell WS et al. . Comparison of measured and FTC-predicted nicotine uptake in smokers. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1995;122:95–103. 10.1007/BF02246082 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Andersson G, Vala EK, Curvall M. The influence of cigarette consumption and smoking machine yields of tar and nicotine on the nicotine uptake and oral mucosal lesions in smokers. J Oral Pathol Med 1997;26:117–23. 10.1111/j.1600-0714.1997.tb00033.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Byrd GD, Davis RA, Caldwell WS et al. . A further study of FTC yield and nicotine absorption in smokers. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1998;139:291–9. 10.1007/s002130050720 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Meger M, Meger-Kossien I, Schuler-Metz A et al. . Simultaneous determination of nicotine and eight nicotine metabolites in urine of smokers using liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci 2002;778:251–61. 10.1016/S0378-4347(01)00451-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Benowitz NL, Pomerleau OF, Pomerleau CS et al. . Nicotine metabolite ratio as a predictor of cigarette consumption. Nicotine Tob Res 2003;5:621–4. 10.1080/1462220031000158717 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.McGuffey JE, Wei B, Bernert JT et al. . Validation of a LC-MS/MS method for quantifying urinary nicotine, six nicotine metabolites and the minor tobacco alkaloids—anatabine and anabasine—in smokers’ urine. PLoS ONE 2014;9:e101816 10.1371/journal.pone.0101816 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Benowitz NL, Fong I, Gupta S. Nicotine metabolic profile in man: comparison of cigarette smoking and transdermal nicotine. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1994;268:296–303. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Jacobson GA, Ferguson SG. Relationship between cotinine and trans-3′-hydroxycotinine glucuronidation and the nicotine metabolite ratio in Caucasian smokers. Biomarkers 2014;19:679–83. 10.3109/1354750X.2014.966254 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Lopes A, Silva N, Bronze MR et al. . Analysis of cocaine and nicotine metabolites in wastewater by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Cross abuse index patterns on a major community. Sci Total Environ 2014;487:673–80. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.10.042 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Derby K, Cuthrell KC, Carmella S et al. . Nicotine metabolism in three ethnic/racial groups with different risks of lung cancer. Cancer EpidemiolBiomarkers Prev 2008;17:3526–35. 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-0424 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Yu L, Mei D, An X et al. . Analysis on diffierence in smoking prevalence among urban residents in Liaoning Province, 1999–2009. Chin J Dis Control Prev 2012;16:842–5. [Google Scholar]
- 43.Su J, QIn Y, Xiang Q et al. . Smoking behaviors and tobacco consumption of smokers among residents in Jiansu Province. Chin J Public Health 2014;30:1368–72. [Google Scholar]