Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Feb 22.
Published in final edited form as: ACS Macro Lett. 2015 Jul 30;4(8):853–856. doi: 10.1021/acsmacrolett.5b00421

Cyclopropenimine Superbases: Competitive Initiation Processes in Lactide Polymerization

Tyler S Stukenbroeker 1, Jeff S Bandar 2, Xiangyi Zhang 1, Tristan H Lambert 2, Robert M Waymouth 1,*
PMCID: PMC4762272  NIHMSID: NIHMS730452  PMID: 26913218

Abstract

Cyclopropenimine superbases were employed to catalyze the ring-opening polymerization of lactide. Polymerization occurred readily in the presence and absence of alcohol initiators. Polymerizations in the absence of alcohol initiators revealed a competitive initiation mechanism involving deprotonation of lactide by the cyclopropenimine to generate an enolate. NMR and MALDI-TOF analysis of the poly(lactides) generated from cyclopropenimines in the absence of alcohol initiators showed acylated lactide and hydroxyl endgroups. Model studies and comparative experiments with guanidine and phosphazene catalysts revealed the subtle influence of the nature of the superbase on competitive initiation processes.


Organocatalysis has proven a versatile strategy for ring-opening polymerization reactions.15 Organic molecules catalyze ring-opening polymerization (ROP) by a variety of mechanisms that are distinct from those of metal alkoxide initiators; the mild conditions and high functional group tolerance of many of these organic catalysts have provided new opportunities for macromolecular synthesis and design.1,2 Superbases6 such as N-heterocyclic carbenes (NHCs), guanidines, amidines, isothioureas, and phosphazenes have proven especially effective as organic catalysts for ROP; in the presence of alcohol initiators these catalysts can hydrogen bond to the alcohol or chain-ends to activate them for the ring-opening of strained monomers (Scheme 1, illustrated for lactide).2 At low initiator (alcohol) concentrations, competitive initiation mechanisms can occur and can be probed by carrying out polymerizations in the absence of alcohols.2,7 In the absence of alcohol initiators, N-heterocyclic carbenes,8,9 amidines,10 and isothioureas11 mediate zwitterionic ring-opening polymerization reactions by a nucleophilic12 mechanism; this latter strategy has proven useful for generating cyclic macromolecules.9

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

Two polymerization mechanisms for lactide with organic catalysts.

Herein, we describe ring-opening polymerization reactions with another class of potent neutral bases derived from bis(dialkylamino)-cyclopropenimines.1315 Lambert recently showed that these compounds have comparable basicity to phosphazenes, are readily prepared in enantiomerically pure form, and are effective organocatalysts for enantioselective Michael and Mannich reactions of glycinate imines. We describe that these superbases are also potent organic catalysts for ring-opening polymerization, but exhibit an additional competitive pathway involving the deprotonation of lactide to generate lactide enolates, which can initiate ring-opening polymerization. The behavior of the cyclopropenimine bases is compared to the guanidine TBD (1,5,7-Triazabicyclo[4.4.0]dec-5-ene) and the phosphazene BEMP (2-tert-butylimino-2-diethyl-amino-1,3-dimethyl-perhydro-1,3,2-diazaphosphorine).

Three achiral cyclopropenimines bearing N-alkyl substituents (Table 1, right inset) were prepared.1315 Polymerizations of lactide initiated with 1-pyrenebutanol in the presence of catalytic amounts of cyclopropenimine 1 proceeded rapidly with greater than 85% conversion in 30 seconds (Table S1, Supporting Information). Molecular weights up to 13 kDa were obtained by controlling the monomer to alcohol ratio. The molecular weight distributions ranged from 1.2–1.4 and generally increased over the course of the reaction. These data, coupled with the observations that polymeric ions corresponding to both odd and even lactic acid units were observed in the MALDI-TOF spectra (Figure S2, Supporting Information) suggest that competitive transesterification reactions occur, leading to chain-scrambling and chain-transfer reactions.2,16

Table 1.

Initiator-Free Ring-opening Polymerization of Lactides with Cyclopropeniminesa

entry monomer catalyst cat. conc. (M) solvent time conv. (%) Mnb Mw/Mn
1 rac-lactide 1 0.010 CH2Cl2 8 min 84 8390 1.42
2 rac-lactide 1 0.050 CH2Cl2 10 min 99 15300 1.57
3c rac-lactide 1 0.007 C6D6 2 days 99 70700 1.46
4 L-lactide 1 0.010 CH2Cl2 8 min 93 11500 1.30
5 L-lactide 2 0.010 CH2Cl2 8 min 90 17300 1.46
6 rac-lactide 3 0.020 CD2Cl2 20 min 98 13100 1.38
7 rac-lactide BEMP 0.010 CH2Cl2 8 min 65 8300 1.24
8 L-lactided TBD 0.0007 CH2Cl2 10 s 11 19000 1.39
9 carbonatee 1 0.010 CH2Cl2 22 hrs 3 - -
a

Conditions: 1.0 M monomer in solvent, room temperature. Quenched with either 4-nitrophenol or benzoic acid.

b

Determined by GPC vs. polystyrene standards.

c

Saturated monomer solution.

d

0.35M monomer solution.

e

Carbonate=trimethylene carbonate.

To test for competitive nucleophilic polymerization mechanisms by the cyclopropenimines, we investigated the ring-opening polymerization of lactide with cyclopropenimines 1–3 in the absence of alcohols (Table 1).

Under these conditions, polymerization proceeded readily with rates only marginally slower than those observed in the presence of alcohol initiators. The molecular weights obtained ranged from Mn = 8000–70,000 Da and were observed to increase with increasing conversion, but exhibited little correlation with the initial [M]0/[I]0 ratio (where I = cyclopropenimine, Table 1, entry 2).

Analysis of the resulting polymers by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry (Fig. S8, Supporting Information) revealed ions corresponding to exact multiples of lactide molecular weights. These data would be consistent with a cyclic polymer generated by a nucleophilic zwitterionic mechanism, but several lines of evidence indicate that a linear polymer is generated. Comparison of the dilute solution viscosities of a high molecular weight polylactide (PLA) prepared from the cyclopropenimine 1 and a known linear sample of PLA were similar (Figure S10, Supporting Information), implicating a linear topology for both samples.17 Furthermore, analysis of the purified polymer by 1H NMR revealed two resonances indicative of polymer endgroups: one at δ 4.37 ppm (CDCl3), diagnostic of a methine proton adjacent to a terminal hydroxyl group and another endgroup signal at δ 5.01 ppm (Fig. 1). These data are inconsistent with a nucleophilic zwitterionic mechanism, as observed for NHCs, amidines, and isothiorureas,9,11 but imply that, in the absence of alcohols, the cyclopropenimines initiate lactide polymerization by an alternate pathway.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

1H NMR (CDCl3) spectra of Entry 1 enlarged to show methine region with comparison to Entry 7. LA=lactide monomer

As cyclopropenimines are potent bases (pKa of conjugate acid approx. 27 in CH3CN),13 we reasoned that these superbases might deprotonate lactide to a lactide enolate, which subsequently initiates the polymerization of lactide (Scheme 2). Several recent reports have indicated that Zr, Zn, or Li enolates can initiate lactide polymerization.1822

Scheme 2.

Scheme 2

Proposed Enolate Initiation Mechanism

The endgroup resonance observed in the 1H NMR spectrum at δ = 5.01 ppm in the 1H NMR spectra (Hd of Figure 1) is consistent with that expected for a methine proton of an alkylated lactide23 and is inconsistent with an O-acylated lactide, as the methine proton of the silyl enolate of lactide (prepared independently) exhibits a resonance at δ 4.41 ppm (Figures S14–S16, SI). These data, as well as model studies described below, indicate that initiation involves acylation of lactide enolate at carbon rather than at oxygen.

To assess if the cyclopropenimine is capable of deprotonating lactide, lactide was treated with cyclopropenimine 1 (1:2 ratio) in C6D6 at room temperature. The addition of 1 to lactide results in the rapid disappearance of the lactide methine resonance at δ = 3.67 ppm (Figure S13, Supporting Information), consistent with the deprotonation of lactide to the lactide enolate.

Furthermore, epimerization of lactide monomers to form meso-lactide is observed during early stages of the polymerization reaction and polymerizations of L-lactide produce a small amount of atactic sequences, suggesting that reversible deprotonation occurs (Figures S5 and S12, Supporting Information).

To provide further evidence that enolates1821 initiate the polymerization of lactide under these reaction conditions, the enolate of methyl isobutyrate was generated with LDA and utilized as an initiator for lactide polymerization.24 Generation of the enolate of methyl isobutyrate with LDA in the presence of excess ester at −78°C, followed by the addition of 25 equivalents of L-lactide resulted in the conversion of 69% of the lactide within 10 minutes to generate poly(lactide). Analysis of the MALDI-TOF mass spectra of the resulting polymer yielded ions corresponding to linear poly(lactide) with methyl isobutryate endgroups. Analysis of the 13C NMR of the resulting low molecular weight poly(lactide) (Mn ~ 2700 Da) was consistent with a 2,2-dimethyl methyl acetate endgroup resulting from acylation at the carbon center of the methyl isobutyrate enolate initiator (Figure S17S19, Supporting Information). These results are consistent with literature examples of carbon alkylation of methyl isobutyrate,2528 and indicate that ester enolates initiate lactide polymerization by a Claisen-type condensation at the carbon of the initiating enolate.

The observation that trimethylene carbonate (TMC) polymerizes with cyclopropenimine 1 only in the presence of alcohol initiators (entry 9 vs. entry S5) is readily explained by the lack of enolizable protons of this carbonate monomer.

As several superbases have been used as organocatalysts for ring-opening polymerization,2 we sought to compare the behavior of the cyclopropenimines (pKa conjugate acid ~27) to two other basic organocatalysts, 1,5,7-Triazabicyclo[4.4.0]dec-5-ene (TBD, pKa conjugate acid ~26.0) and 2-tert-butylimino-2-diethylamino-1,3-dimethylperhydro-1,3,2-diazaphosphorine (BEMP, pKa conjugate acid ~ 27.629).

The ring-opening polymerization of lactide in the absence of alcohols with the phosphazene BEMP (Table 1, Entry 7) was slightly slower but displayed similar polymer endgroup resonances (δ 5.01 and 4.37 ppm, see Fig. 1) and MALDI spectra to those of cyclopropenimines, indicative of an enolate-initiated polymerization mechanism.

In contrast, lactide polymerization with the guanidine TBD was much faster and reached higher molecular weight than with either the cyclopropenimines or the phosphazene BEMP (table 1, entry 8). The polymerization is first order in monomer and displays a linear relationship between conversion and molecular weight (Figure S21, Supporting Information). Furthermore, when the product polylactide was analyzed by MALDI, the masses corresponded to polylactide chains with attached TBD endgroups.

The presence of polymer-bound TBD strongly implies a nucleophilic initiation by TBD, in contrast to the deprotonation mechanism for cyclopropenimine and phosphazene bases. The nucleophilicity of TBD has previously been demonstrated in both lactone polymerizations and acyl transfer model studies.30,31 In the latter case, a stable, neutral adduct of butyrolactone with TBD was observed and characterized.32 Whereas this formed an H-bonded, 8-membered ring that was disfavored for polymerization, our results indicate that the analogous lactide intermediate propagates rapidly (Scheme 3).

Scheme 3.

Scheme 3

Proposed mechanism for initiation and polymerization of lactide by TBD, including TBD-bound polylactide detected by MALDI.

In summary, superbases are a versatile class of catalysts for organocatalytic ring-opening polymerization reactions, whose polymerization behavior depends sensitively on their basicity, nucleophilicity, and the presence or absence of alcohol initiators. In the presence of alcohol initiators, these superbases catalyze ring-opening polymerization by hydrogen-bond activation of initiating or propagating alcohols. However, at low initiator (i.e. alcohol) concentrations, competitive reactions of the superbases with lactone monomers can lead to alternate mechanisms of initiation and polymerization. These competitive mechanisms can lead to a broadening of the molecular weight distributions, particularly at high [monomer]/[initiator] ratios. Polymerization of lactones in the absence of alcohols can illuminate these alternative pathways and reveal a range of behaviors. N-heterocyclic carbenes,8,9 amidines,10 and isothioureas11 act as nucleophilic initiators, mediating zwitterionic ring-opening polymerizations to generate cyclic polyesters. Herein we demonstrated that cyclopropenimine and phosphazene superbases deprotonate lactide to generate enolates that initiate lactide polymerization. The guanidine TBD exhibits mixed behavior, involving nucleophilic initiation to generate a covalent acylated guanidine which likely propagates by an H-bond mechanism.

Supplementary Material

2

Acknowledgments

This material is based on work supported by the National Science Foundation (DMR-1407658, CHE-1306730) and National Institutes of Health (NIHGMS R01 GM102611). XZ is grateful for a Stanford Graduate Fellowship. TS and JB both acknowledge National Defense Science and Engineering Graduate Fellowships. JB was also supported by a Graduate Research Fellowship from the NSF. Work at the Molecular Foundry (MALDI-TOF MS) was supported by the Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, of the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract No. DE-AC02–05CH11231.

Footnotes

ASSOCIATED CONTENT

NMR Spectra, GPC traces, MALDI and ESI-MS of polymers and model studies. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org

References

  • 1.Kamber NE, Jeong W, Waymouth RM, Pratt RC, Lohmeijer BG, Hedrick JL. Chem Rev. 2007;107:5813–5840. doi: 10.1021/cr068415b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kiesewetter MK, Shin EJ, Hedrick JL, Waymouth RM. Macromolecules. 2010;43:2093–2107. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Thomas C, Bibal B. Green Chem. 2014;16:1687–1699. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Mespouille L, Coulembier O, Kawalec M, Dove AP, Dubois P. Prog Polym Sci. 2014;39:1144–1164. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Fevre M, Pinaud J, Gnanou Y, Vignolle J, Taton D. Chem Soc Rev. 2013;42:2142–2172. doi: 10.1039/c2cs35383k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ishikawa T, editor. Superbases for Organic Synthesis. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; Chichester: 2009. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Jones GO, Chang YA, Horn HW, Acharya AK, Rice JE, Hedrick JL, Waymouth RM. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B. 2015;119:5728–5737. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.5b01595. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Jeong W, Shin EJ, Culkin DA, Hedrick JL, Waymouth RM. J Am Chem Soc. 2009;131:4884–4891. doi: 10.1021/ja809617v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Brown HA, Waymouth RM. Acc Chem Res. 2013;46:2585–2596. doi: 10.1021/ar400072z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Brown HA, De Crisci AG, Hedrick JL, Waymouth RM. ACS Macro Letters. 2012;1:1113–1115. doi: 10.1021/mz300276u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Zhang X, Waymouth RM. Acs Macro Letters. 2014;3:1024–1028. doi: 10.1021/mz500525n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Taylor JE, Bull SD, Williams JMJ. Chem Soc Rev. 2012;41:2109–2121. doi: 10.1039/c2cs15288f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Bandar JS, Lambert TH. J Am Chem Soc. 2012;134:5552–5555. doi: 10.1021/ja3015764. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Bandar JS, Lambert TH. J Am Chem Soc. 2013;135:11799–11802. doi: 10.1021/ja407277a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Bandar JS, Barthelme A, Mazori AY, Lambert TH. Chem Sci. 2015;6:1537–1547. doi: 10.1039/c4sc02402h. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Penczek S, Duda A, Libiszowski J. Macromolecular Symposia. 1998;128:241–254. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Semlyen JA. In: Cyclic Polymers. 2nd. Semlyen JA, editor. Kluwer; Dordrecht: 2000. p. 790. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Dobrzynski PJ. Polym Sci, Part A: Polym Chem. 2004;42:1886–1900. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Pastusiak M, Dobrzynski P, Kaczmarczyk B, Kasperczyk J, Smola A. Polymer. 2011;52:5255–5261. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Dechy-Cabaret O, Martin-Vaca B, Bourissou D. Chem Rev. 2004;104:6147–6176. doi: 10.1021/cr040002s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Bhaw-Luximon A, Jhurry D, Spassky N, Pensec S, Belleney J. Polymer. 2001;42:9651–9656. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Miyake GM, Zhang Y, Chen EYX. J Polym Sci, Part A: Polym Chem. 2015;53:1523–1532. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Trimaille T, Möller M, Gurny RJ. Polym Sci, Part A: Polym Chem. 2004;42:4379–4391. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Dong S, Parker GD, Tei T, Paquette LA. Org Lett. 2006;8:2429–2431. doi: 10.1021/ol060827j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Wang Z, Ni J, Kuninobu Y, Kanai M. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2014;53:3496–3499. doi: 10.1002/anie.201311105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Nagendiran A, Verho O, Haller C, Johnston EV, Bäckvall J-E. J Org Chem. 2014;79:1399–1405. doi: 10.1021/jo4028006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Friedrich J, Dörrich S, Berkefeld A, Kraft P, Tacke R. Organometallics. 2014;33:796–803. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Stoltz BM, Bennett NB, Duquette DC, Goldberg AFG, Liu Y, Loewinger MB, Reeves CM. In: Comprehensive Organic Synthesis II. Second. Knochel P, editor. Elsevier; Amsterdam: 2014. pp. 1–55. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Schwesinger R, Schlemper H. Angew Chem. 1987;99:1212–1214. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Pratt RC, Lohmeijer BGG, Long DA, Waymouth RM, Hedrick JL. J Am Chem Soc. 2006;128:4556–4557. doi: 10.1021/ja060662+. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Chuma A, Horn HW, Swope WC, Pratt RC, Zhang L, Lohmeijer BGG, Wade CG, Waymouth RM, Hedrick JL, Rice JE. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130:6749–6754. doi: 10.1021/ja0764411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Lohmeijer BGG, Pratt RC, Leibfarth F, Logan JW, Long DA, Dove AP, Nederberg F, Choi J, Wade C, Waymouth RM, Hedrick JL. Macromolecules. 2006;39:8574–8583. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

2

RESOURCES