Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2016 Feb 23;6:19102. doi: 10.1038/srep19102

Facile Growth of Cu2ZnSnS4 Thin-Film by One-Step Pulsed Hybrid Electrophoretic and Electroplating Deposition

Hung-Wei Tsai 1, Chia-Wei Chen 1, Stuart R Thomas 1,2, Cheng-Hung Hsu 1, Wen-Chi Tsai 1, Yu-Ze Chen 1, Yi-Chung Wang 1, Zhiming M Wang 2, Hwen-Fen Hong 3, Yu-Lun Chueh 1,a
PMCID: PMC4763260  PMID: 26902556

Abstract

The use of costly and rare metals such as indium and gallium in Cu(In,Ga)Se2 (CIGS) based solar cells has motivated research into the use of Cu2ZnSnS4 (CZTS) as a suitable replacement due to its non-toxicity, abundance of compositional elements and excellent optical properties (1.5 eV direct band gap and absorption coefficient of ~104 cm−1). In this study, we demonstrate a one-step pulsed hybrid electrodeposition method (PHED), which combines electrophoretic and electroplating deposition to deposit uniform CZTS thin-films. Through careful analysis and optimization, we are able to demonstrate CZTS solar cells with the VOC, JSC, FF and η of 350 mV, 3.90 mA/cm2, 0.43 and 0.59%, respectively.

The amount of solar energy we can potentially harvest is many times greater than what we currently consume and is therefore considered one of the most promising solutions to the energy crisis currently facing us in the twenty-first century1. Single junction inorganic solar cells with a maximum theoretical energy conversion efficiencies (η) of ~30% offers one such method to harness this energy2. To date, numerous technologies have been developed offering excellent performance, including crystalline Si, III-V compounds of GaAs and InP, Cu(In,Ga)Se2 (CIGS), and CdTe, all of which exhibit efficiencies over 20%3. CIGS-based solar cells currently hold the world record efficiency value at 21.7%, offering an attractive material candidate for thin-film solar cells3. However, their use of scarce and costly metals such as indium and gallium creates a bottleneck when considering low-cost electricity generation.

Cu2ZnSnS4 (CZTS) has been proposed as a replacement for CIGS due to its non-toxicity, use of relatively abundant elements in its composition and its excellent photo-electronic properties, including a direct bandgap of 1.5 eV4 and high absorption coefficient of over 104 cm−1 ref. 4. There are numerous methods used to synthesize CZTS, including physically vacuum deposition techniques such as sputtering, evaporation, pulsed laser deposition (PLD), and chemically based non-vacuum deposition techniques such as electrodeposition, hydrazine-based solution and sol gel-based methods5. Among these chemically based non-vacuum deposition techniques, electrodeposition technique offers the advantages of low-cost, large area plating, in an industry compatible process, which is competitive with other techniques used for CZTS synthesis. Three primary electroplating based deposition techniques have been developed, including a stacked elemental layer approach (SEL), metal alloy electrodeposition (MAE) and quaternary electrodeposition (QED), each using ion based precursor species in the electrolyte6. Additionally, electrophoretic deposition (EPD) is an alternative approach whereby CZTS nanoparticles act as the precursor species in the electrolyte, typically enabling faster film formation7. In each case, a post deposition annealing step in the presence of a chalcogen source is required. Each process possesses their own merits and drawbacks, and all of them have drawn significant attention as suitable methods for large area CZTS thin film deposition.

Here, we propose a one-step pulsed hybrid electrochemical deposition method (PHED) to deposit quaternary elements of copper, zinc, tin and sulfur onto Mo coated soda lime glass (SLG) substrates. Unlike electroplating or electrophoretic deposition techniques that make exclusive use of ionic precursors or nanoparticles respectively, the proposed one-step PHED synthesis combines both techniques. Our PHED process combines the electroplating of Zn and Sn ions with electrophoretic deposition of a Cu2−xS nanoparticle precursor in a single electrolyte continuous process. This process offers a number of advantages over the individual methods. Firstly, we are able to avoid the time consuming pre-alloying/soft annealing inter-layer diffusion and interlayer rinsing steps associated with SEL approaches. Likewise, in comparison to MAE and QED, the formation of the Cu2−xS nanoparticles reduces the complexity of the electrolyte chemistry, offering better bath stability and a potentially faster overall deposition process. Finally, this method avoids the time consuming and complex process of CZTS nanoparticle preparation required when using an exclusively EPD deposition process7,8. In this work, we use a pulsed hybrid electrodeposition (PHED)9,10 method as opposed to a more conventional potentiostatic methods, which enables the formation of more uniform CZTS thin-films. A final sulfurization step is performed on the films by placing then in a sulfur vapor atmosphere for 1 hr. The materials characteristics and device performance were investigated in detail.

Results and Discussion

Our PHED deposition of CZTS thin-films was carried out using a three-electrode cell, consisting of an Mo coated soda lime glass substrate as the working electrode (WE), a graphite bar as the counter electrode (CE) and a silver/silver chloride (Ag/AgCl) electrode as the reference electrode (RE). Figure 1(a) illustrates a schematic representation of the system with an electrolyte solution of deionized (DI) water containing 0.0022 M copper sulfate (CuSO4), 0.011 M zinc sulfate (ZnSO4), 0.005 M tin chloride (SnCl2), 0.08 M sodium thiosulfate (Na2S2O3) and 0.05 M tri-sodium citrate (Na3C6H5O7) used as a complexing agent for the Sn2+ ions11, respectively. The pH value of electrolyte was 5.81 with no further pH adjustment applied. To deposit the CZTS films, the pulsed electrodeposition method was applied using a 10% duty cycle (on-time duration of 0.25 sec at −3 V, off-time duration of 2.25 sec at 0 V) as shown in Fig. 1(b). The set potential of 0 V during the off-time is the potential difference between applied voltage and open circuit voltage, which is the steady state without any disturbance of applied potential. During the off-time, the relatively unstable as-deposited CZTS film will re-dissolve into electrolyte again, which will happen on the top part of film. This is beneficial to the film thickness uniformity. So we can observe that the current is still flowing to the positive direction during the off-time. The off-time allows the distribution of the precursor species within the electrolyte to return to a homogeneous state, thus allowing a higher deposition rate during the on-time when compared to potentiostatic deposition methods12. Our PHED method integrates a two-stage chemical process, enabling the use of both electroplating and electrophoretic deposition in a single ‘one pot’ deposition method. In this process, we first dissolve our metal ions and Sn complexing agent (Na3C6H5O7) in DI water as electrolyte. Shortly afterwards, we add our Na2S2O3, initiating the formation of a Cu2−xS nanoparticle precipitate, in the electrolyte.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

(a) A schematic of three-electrode cell used for pulsed hybrid electrodeposition. (b) Curve of voltage, current and timing utilised during pulsed electrodeposition. (c) Elemental compositions of PHED-deposited CZTS thin films prior to the sulfurization process with different complexation durations. (d) An optical image illustrating the change of color of the electrolytic solution after the addition of Na2S2O3.

The key to preparing a suitable electrolyte lies in the sequence and timing, in which the various precursors are added. The order of addition from first to last is Na3C6H5O7 → SnCl2 → ZnSO4 → CuSO4 → Na2S2O3, respectively. There is a specific duration needed before the addition of Na2S2O3 so the complexation reaction between the Na3C6H5O7 and Sn2+ can be controlled since the reaction duration will affect the elemental composition of the electrodeposited CZTS film.

Figure 1(c) shows the results of the compositional analysis obtained by energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS), and we observe that when the reaction duration is longer, the more complete complexation of the Sn in the electrolyte will hinder the reduction of Sn during the final electrodeposition. Therefore, the relative Sn and Zn percentages decrease while the Cu and S percentages increase. Na2S2O3 is a common sulfur source used in CZTS electrodeposition, and here it is also used as a reducing agent for the Cu. After the oxidation-reduction reaction between copper sulfate and sodium thiosulfate, the Cu2+ ions are reduced to Inline graphic ions and the Cu2−xS then precipitates13.

First, Cu2+ will be reduced by thiosulfate by the reaction

graphic file with name srep19102-m2.jpg

Then, S2− will form by the reactions

graphic file with name srep19102-m3.jpg
graphic file with name srep19102-m4.jpg

Finally, S2− will react with Cu and precipitate insoluble copper sulfide by

graphic file with name srep19102-m5.jpg

or

graphic file with name srep19102-m6.jpg

Thus, the color of the electrolyte solution changes from blue to a rusty orange color [Fig. 1(d)].

This oxidation-reduction reaction will precipitate Cu2−xS nanoparticles with a diameter of ~10 nm as observed under transmission electron microscopy (TEM) [Fig. 2(a)]. The selective area electron diffraction pattern (SAED) [Fig. 2(b)] can be indexed to the contribution of polycrystalline CuS and Cu2S. The X-ray diffraction (XRD) spectra of the precipitate shown in Fig. 2(c) is consistent with the Cu2−xS (JCPDS 2-1292 card). The precipitate is primarily composed of Cu (~48.7 at %) and S (~42.5 at %) as observed by EDS (details in Table 1). Once the electrolyte is prepared, the Sn, Zn and Cu2−xS were deposited onto the Mo coated SLG substrate using our PHED process. Following 400 cycles of PHED (16:40 min), we obtain a 1 μm thick CZTS thin-film on our Mo coated (400 nm) soda lime glass (SLG) substrate. Top and cross sectional scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of the CZTS film morphology before sulfurization are shown in Fig. 2(d).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

(a) TEM image (b) SAED pattern and (c) XRD spectra of polycrystalline Cu2−xS (CuS and Cu2S) nanoparticle precipitate prepared in electrolyte solution showing an average diameter of ~10 nm and (c) top and cross section (inset) SEM image of PHED-deposited CZTS thin films prior to the sulfurization process.

Table 1. Elemental composition of Cu2−xS nanoparticle precipitate in electrolytic solution.

Cu (at%) Zn (at%) Sn (at%) S (at%)
48.74 3.12 5.60 42.54
Open in a new tab

Schematic illustrations of the complexation process for the Sn ions and formation of the Cu2−xS nanoparticle precipitate are shown in Fig. 3(a). In order to form a kesterite absorber suitable for solar cell applications, the as-deposited CZTS thin-films must undergo a final sulfurization process whereby the films, along with S and SnS pellets, are placed together in a graphite box, and then placed into a furnace under a H2 (20 sccm) and N2 (180 sccm) atmosphere at a pressure of 60 torr for 1 hr. The films are heated according to the temperature profile illustrated in Fig. 3(b) across a range of temperatures (450 °C to 600 °C). The high temperature sulfurization process is applied via the following reactions14:

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

(a) Flow diagram illustrations showing (top) evolution of C2–xS nanoparticle precipitate formation and (bottom) effect of the duration of complexation reaction between citrate and Sn2+ on deposition rate, (b) schematic illustration of the sulfurization process timing and (c) overall process flow showing PHED film deposition and sulfurization step for the formation of CZTS absorber.

graphic file with name srep19102-m7.jpg
graphic file with name srep19102-m8.jpg
graphic file with name srep19102-m9.jpg
graphic file with name srep19102-m10.jpg

A schematic of the entire film deposition and sulfurization process is shown in Fig. 3(c). During the sulfurization process, the chalcogenides of Cu2S, ZnS and SnS will form first, followed by a further reaction with the excess S vapor to form CZTS. Note that the excess S vapor present during the elevated temperature process facilitates the formation of CZTS, while the presence of the SnS pellets helps prevent the loss of Sn15,16. However, if care is not taken, the equilibrium S vapor pressure will rise as the sulfurization temperature increases14, and insufficient S vapor can result in the thermal decomposition of CZTS into secondary phases17.

To shed light on the crystallinity of the CZTS, the XRD spectra for each of the films were acquired [Fig. 4(a)] where we can observe three clear peaks corresponding to the (112), (220), and (312) planes of CZTS were indexed. Analysis of the FWHM of the CZTS (112) plane shows that the crystallinity is initially enhanced with increasing sulfurization temperature as summarized in Table 2. Notably, little enhancement is observed when the sulfurization temperature is increased beyond 500 °C. With only a 1.5% decrease of the (112) XRD FWHM observed as we increase the sulfurization temperature from 500 to 600 °C.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

(a) XRD and (b) Raman spectra of CZTS thin films fabricated using sulfurization process temperatures between 450 °C and 600 °C.

Table 2. XRD FWHM of CZTS (112) plane under varied sulfurization temperatures.

Sulfurization temperature (112)FWHM (deg.)
450 °C 0.545
500 °C 0.408
550 °C 0.406
600 °C 0.402
Open in a new tab

The same films with different sulfurization temperatures from 450–600 °C were also examined by Raman spectroscopy as shown in Fig. 4(b) with distinct Raman-active vibration modes at 287, 338 cm−1 and B Raman-active vibration modes at 374 cm−1 for CZTS found for all sulfurization temperatures18. At each sulfurization temperature point, we can clearly observe the expected kesterite related CZTS Raman modes19. No significant change was observed in any of the peak intensities or positions with no Cu2S, ZnS or SnS related peaks being observed at any temperature, suggesting that sulfurization is being performed within an appropriate process window. Note that various temperatures were investigated with the best performing devices obtained following a 550 °C sulfurization process. The elemental compositions of these ‘best performing’ films pre and post-sulfurization are listed in Table 3 (obtained by EDS analysis), with a post- sulfurization elemental compositions of ~27.18 at %, ~14.44 at %, ~12.13 at %, and ~46.25 at % for Cu, Zn, Sn, and S elements, respectively. In general, it has been observed that moderately Cu-poor and Zn-rich films (such as observed in our pre-sulfurized CZTS) lead to enhanced solar cell performance20. In our case, a slight elemental loss was observed during the high temperature sulfurization process, leading to a slight adjustment to our [Cu]/([Zn] + [Sn]) and [Zn]/[Sn] ratios with the [Cu]/([Zn] + [Sn]) ratio being most effected (Table 3). The values represent the smallest changes observed in any of our films prepared at the sulfurization temperature of 550 °C, and correspond to the compositional values reported by others.

Table 3. Elemental composition of PHED CZTS thin-films before and after sulfurization at an optimized temperature of 550 °C.

  Cu(at%) Zn(at%) Sn(at%) S (at%) [Cu]/([Zn]+[Sn]) [Zn]/[Sn] S/metal
As-deposited 25.33 19.44 14.56 40.67 0.75 1.34 0.69
Sulfurized 27.18 14.44 12.13 46.25 1.02 1.19 0.86
Open in a new tab

SEM images illustrated in Fig. 5(a–d) reveal similar surface morphologies for all of the CZTS thin-films sulfurized at temperatures from 450 to 600 °C. However, the optical properties of the CZTS thin films measured using UV-Vis spectroscopy vary significantly. The calculated band gap21 from the plots of (αhυ)2 versus incident photon energies in Fig. 5(e) reveal CZTS films sulfurized at 550 °C show the best optical properties in terms of suitability for kesterite solar cell fabrication, with a significantly wider band gap of 1.48 eV4. The films sulfurized at relatively lower temperatures of 450 °C and 500 °C reveal smaller band gaps22, this may be due to the non-complete formation of kesterite CZTS and the secondary phase formation of Cu2SnS316,23. For the film sulfurized at 600 °C, its reduced band gap is likely due to thermal decomposition of the CZTS as a result of the S vapor being below the equilibrium pressure required to form CZTS24.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

Top view SEM images showing morphologies of CZTS films after the sulfurization processes at (a) 600 °C, (b) 550 °C, (c) 500 °C and (d) 450 °C. (e) plots of (αhυ)2 versus different photon energies with extracted optical band-gaps for the CZTS absorber thin-films.

To complete the fabrication of the CZTS solar cell devices, we deposited a cadmium sulfide (CdS) buffer layer followed by intrinsic zinc oxide (i-ZnO), an indium doped tin oxide (ITO) layer and a final aluminum electrode (details in the experimental section). The detailed device configuration is shown in inset of Fig. 6 and the corresponding J-V characteristics of CZTS solar cells measured under air mass 1.5 illumination are shown in Fig. 6. The extracted performance data for the complete set of CZTS films is shown in Table 4. Our results show relatively high RS and low RSH, resulting in poor current density and open circuit voltage and thereby degradation in overall cell performance. Importantly, the poorer performance of the cells fabricated utilizing the 450 °C, 500 °C and 600 °C sulfurization processes can be attributed to the poor CZTS absorber quality as determined from a combination of the optical band gap and XRD measurements.

Figure 6. J-V characteristics of PHED CZTS solar cells fabricated using the sulfurization process temperatures between 450 °C and 600 °C measured under air mass 1.5 illumination.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

Inset shows the device configuration.

Table 4. Photovoltaic performance results for CZTS at different sulfurized temperatures.

Sulfurization temperature Voc (mV) Jsc (mA/cm2) FF η (%) Rs (Ω cm2) Rsh (Ω cm2)
450 °C 90 1.83 0.27 0.04 42.25 13.37
500 °C 170 2.03 0.31 0.11 67.98 55.36
550 °C 350 3.90 0.43 0.59 51.10 385.30
600 °C 230 3.70 0.33 0.28 46.52 90.67
Open in a new tab

Clearly, the cells prepared using a 550 °C sulfurization process exhibit markedly higher performance with a VOC, JSC, FF and η of 350 mV, 3.90 mA/cm2, 0.43 and 0.59%, respectively. The significantly higher RSH observed in these devices is one contributing factor to their enhanced performance, and is likely a consequence of the optimum sulfurization process. The wider band gap of the films prepared using the 550 °C sulfurization process is expected to be the biggest factor in enhancing their outright performance. However, we expect these both of these factors to be inter-related. We believe the remaining cells performances are inhibited by insufficient sulfurization of the CZTS at 450 °C, 500 °C and the onset of thermal decomposition of CZTS at 600 °C as discussed previously. Table 5 lists the progress of quaternary electrodeposition of CZTS. In our work, we demonstrate a facile electrolyte solution preparation method, where in comparison to conventional electroplating methods performed, a reduction in the number of complexing agents is required. As such, we can potentially reduce the complexity and cost of the CZTS absorber fabrication while concurrently increasing the speed at with the films can be deposited. One part of our method that is still open to further enhancement is the optimization of the sulfurization process in order to enhance the cell performance. Specifically, it would be beneficial if we could afford better control of the required S vapor during the elevated sulfurization temperature. We consider this a potential avenue toward achieving further enhanced kesterite CZTS solar cells performance, and will be the subject of future work. Finally, we would like to add that our PHED process is an extremely low-cost process when compared to costly vacuum based thin-film solar cell fabrication methods, and as such offers a viable route toward low-cost sustainable energy.

Table 5. Comparison of quaternary electrodeposition of CZTS thin-films.

Publishedyear Method Sulfurizationtemperature (°C) Efficiency(%) Ref.
2010 Electroplating 550 °C N/A 25
2011 Electroplating 550 °C N/A 26
2011 Electroplating 500 °C N/A 27
2011 Electroplating 550 °C N/A 28
2012 Electroplating 550 °C 1.21 29
2013 Electroplating 200-600 °C N/A 30
2013 Electroplating 500 °C N/A 31
2013 electrophoretic deposition Not mentioned N/A 7
2014 Electroplating 450–580 °C N/A 32
2014 Electroplating 300–500 °C N/A 33
2014 Electroplating 550 °C N/A 34
2014 Electroplating 580 °C 1.66 35
2014 Electroplating 590 °C 5.53 36
2015 Hybrid electrodeposition 450–600 °C 0.59 This work
Open in a new tab

Conclusions

In summary, a one-step pulsed hybrid electrophoretic & electroplating deposition method was demonstrated for the deposition of kesterite CZTS thin-films, enabling the formation of high quality films with appropriate elemental compositions suitable for solar cell applications. A facile electrolyte solution preparation method was proposed where in comparison to conventional electroplating methods, a reduction in the number of complexing agents required in the solution at the time of deposition provides a more stable electrolyte environment for film formation, in turn leading to highly uniform films. Likewise, we remove the complexity traditionally associated with nanoparticle preparation required for CZTS electrophoretic deposition. We have investigated the effect of the sulfurization temperature on the films structural and optical qualities, and are able to observe that films exposed to a 550 °C sulfurization process possess the most suitable characteristics for solar cell fabrication. A significant widening of the optical bandgap is observed in films prepared at this temperature, leading to enhanced performance, with our best CZTS solar cell devices having a VOC, JSC, FF and η of 350 mV, 3.90 mA/cm2, 0.43 and 0.59%, respectively. Furthermore, our PHED process is an extremely low-cost process compared to costly vacuum based thin-film solar cell fabrication methods, offering a viable route toward low-cost sustainable energy.

Methods

The PHED deposition of CZTS thin-films was carried out using a three-electrode cell, consisting of an Mo coated soda lime glass substrate as the working electrode (WE), a graphite bar as the counter electrode (CE) and a silver/silver chloride (Ag/AgCl) electrode as the reference electrode (RE). An electrolyte solution of deionized (DI) water contains 0.0022 M copper sulfate (CuSO4), 0.011 M zinc sulfate (ZnSO4), 0.005 M tin chloride (SnCl2), 0.08 M sodium thiosulfate (Na2S2O3) and 0.05 M tri-sodium citrate (Na3C6H5O7) used as a complexing agent for the Sn2+ ions, respectively. The pH value of electrolyte was 5.81 with no further pH adjustment applied. To deposit the CZTS films, the pulsed electrodeposition method was applied using a 10% duty cycle (on-time duration of 0.25 sec at −3 V, off-time duration of 2.25 sec at 0 V). The set potential of 0030 V during the off-time is the potential difference between applied voltage and open circuit voltage, which is the steady state without any disturbance of applied potential. Surface morphologies were examined using a Hitachi S-8010 field-emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM). Raman spectra for the CIGS films were obtained using a using a HORIBA Jobin-Yvon, LabRAM HR800 system, equipped with a 632.8 nm laser. The quality and crystal structure of the films were confirmed by X-ray diffraction (XRD) using a Shimadzu XRD-6000 with Cu Kα radiation (0.154 nm). Optical reflectance was measured using a Hitachi U-4100 UV–Visible-NIR Spectrometer. The current-voltage characteristics were measured using a Keithley 4200-SCS parameter analyzer under AM 1.5 G solar simulator at a constant temperature of 25 °C.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Tsai, H.-W. et al. Facile Growth of Cu2ZnSnS4 Thin-Film by One-Step Pulsed Hybrid Electrophoretic and Electroplating Deposition. Sci. Rep. 6, 19102; doi: 10.1038/srep19102 (2016).

Acknowledgments

The research is supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology through Grant through grants no 104-2628-M-007-004-MY3, 104-2221-E-007-048-MY3, 104-2633-M-007-001, 104-2622-M-007-002-CC2, and the National Tsing Hua University through Grant no. 104N2022E1. Y.L. Chueh greatly appreciates the use of facility at CNMM, National Tsing Hua University through Grant No. 104N2744E1.

Footnotes

Author Contributions Y.-L.C. supervised the research project. H.-W.T. operated the growth of Cu2ZnSnS4 thin film. C.-W.C. carried out the KCN washing and CdS capping on Cu2ZnSnS4 thin film. C.-H.H. and W.-C.T. carried out the deposition of i-ZnO, ITO and aluminum electrode to complete the solar cells. H.-W.T. carried out the SEM, XRD, Raman, Optical characterizations. Y.-Z.C. carried out the TEM characterizations. Y.-C.W. measured the performance of CZTS solar cells. H.-W.T., S.-R.T., Z.-M.W., H.-F.H. and Y.-L.C co-wrote the manuscript and all authors made contribution to the strict discussions and the revision of the final manuscript.

References

  1. Lewis N. S. & Nocera D. G. Powering the planet: Chemical challenges in solar energy utilization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 15729–15735, doi: 10.1073/pnas.0603395103 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Shockley W. & Queisser H. J. Detailed Balance Limit of Efficiency of p‐n Junction Solar Cells. J. Appl. Phys. 32, 510–519, doi: 10.1063/1.1736034 (1961). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  3. Green M. A., Emery K., Hishikawa Y., Warta W. & Dunlop E. D. Solar cell efficiency tables (version 46). Prog. Photovolt. 23, 805–812, doi: 10.1002/pip.2637 (2015). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  4. Persson C. Electronic and optical properties of Cu2ZnSnS4 and Cu2ZnSnSe4. J. Appl. Phys. 107, 053710, doi: 10.1063/1.3318468 (2010). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  5. Suryawanshi M. P. et al. CZTS based thin film solar cells: a status review. Mater. Technol. 28, 98–109, doi: 10.1179/1753555712Y.0000000038 (2013). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. Colombara D. et al. Electrodeposition of kesterite thin films for photovoltaic applications: Quo vadis? Physica Status Solidi A Appl. Res. 212, 88–102, doi: 10.1002/pssa.201431364 (2015). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kornhuber K., Kavalakkatt J., Lin X., Ennaoui A. & Lux-Steiner M. C. In situ monitoring of electrophoretic deposition of Cu2ZnSnS4 nanocrystals. RSC Adv. 3, 5845–5850, doi: 10.1039/C3RA23093G (2013). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  8. Guo Q., Hillhouse H. W. & Agrawal R. Synthesis of Cu2ZnSnS4 Nanocrystal Ink and Its Use for Solar Cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 11672–11673, doi: 10.1021/ja904981r (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gurav K. V. et al. Pulsed electrodeposited CZTS thin films: Effect of duty cycle. Mater. Lett. 108, 316–319, doi: 10.1016/j.matlet.2013.06.062 (2013). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  10. Despic A. R. & Popov K. I. The effect of pulsating potential on the morphology of metal deposits obtained by mass-transport controlled electrodeposition. J. Appl. Electrochem. 1, 275–278, doi: 10.1007/bf00688649 (1971). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gouda V. K., Rizkalla E. N., Abd-El-Wahab S. & Ibrahim E. M. Corrosion behaviour in organic acid solutions—I. Tin electrode. Corros. Sci. 21, 1–15, doi: 10.1016/0010-938X(81)90058-5 (1981). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  12. Chandrasekar M. S. & Pushpavanam M. Pulse and pulse reverse plating—Conceptual, advantages and applications. Electrochim. Acta. 53, 3313–3322, doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2007.11.054 (2008). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  13. Grozdanov I., Barlingay C. K., Dey S. K., Ristov M. & Najdoski M. Experimental study of the copper thiosulfate system with respect to thin-film deposition. Thin Solid Films 250, 67–71, doi: 10.1016/0040-6090(94)90167-8 (1994). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  14. Yin X., Tang C., Sun L., Shen Z. & Gong H. Study on Phase Formation Mechanism of Non- and Near-Stoichiometric Cu2ZnSn(S,Se)4 Film Prepared by Selenization of Cu–Sn–Zn–S Precursors. Chem. Mater. 26, 2005–2014, doi: 10.1021/cm403423e (2014). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  15. Redinger A., Berg D. M., Dale P. J. & Siebentritt S. The Consequences of Kesterite Equilibria for Efficient Solar Cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 3320–3323, doi: 10.1021/ja111713g (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Weber A., Mainz R. & Schock H. W. On the Sn loss from thin films of the material system Cu–Zn–Sn–S in high vacuum. J. Appl. Phys. 107, 013516, doi: 10.1063/1.3273495 (2010). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  17. Scragg J. J. et al. Effects of Back Contact Instability on Cu2ZnSnS4 Devices and Processes. Chem. Mater. 25, 3162–3171, doi: 10.1021/cm4015223 (2013). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  18. Khare A. et al. Calculation of the lattice dynamics and Raman spectra of copper zinc tin chalcogenides and comparison to experiments. J. Appl. Phys. 111, 083707, doi: 10.1063/1.4704191 (2012). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  19. Fernandes P. A., Salomé P. M. P. & da Cunha A. F. Growth and Raman scattering characterization of Cu2ZnSnS4 thin films. Thin Solid Films 517, 2519–2523, doi: 10.1016/j.tsf.2008.11.031 (2009). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  20. Delbos S. Kësterite thin films for photovoltaics : a review. EPJ Photovolt. 3, 35004, doi: 10.1051/epjpv/2012008 (2012). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kumar V., Kr. Sharma S., Sharma T. P. & Singh V. Band gap determination in thick films from reflectance measurements. Opt. Mater. 12, 115–119, doi: 10.1016/S0925-3467(98)00052-4 (1999). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  22. Yoo H., Kim J. & Zhang L. Sulfurization temperature effects on the growth of Cu2ZnSnS4 thin film. Curr. Appl. Phys. 12, 1052–1057, doi: 10.1016/j.cap.2012.01.006 (2012). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  23. Fernandes P. A., Salomé P. M. P. & Cunha A. F. d. A study of ternary Cu2SnS3 and Cu3SnS4 thin films prepared by sulfurizing stacked metal precursors. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 43, 215403, doi: 10.1088/0022-3727/43/21/215403 (2010). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  24. Song X. et al. A Review on Development Prospect of CZTS Based Thin Film Solar Cells. Int. J. Photoenergy 2014, 11, doi: 10.1155/2014/613173 (2014). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  25. Pawar S. M. et al. Single step electrosynthesis of Cu2ZnSnS4 (CZTS) thin films for solar cell application. Electrochim. Acta. 55, 4057–4061, doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2010.02.051 (2010). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  26. Cui Y., Zuo S., Jiang J., Yuan S. & Chu J. Synthesis and characterization of co-electroplated Cu2ZnSnS4 thin films as potential photovoltaic material. Sol. Energ. Mat. Sol. Cells 95, 2136–2140, doi: 10.1016/j.solmat.2011.03.013 (2011). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  27. Jeon M., Tanaka Y., Shimizu T. & Shingubara S. Formation and characterization of single-step electrodeposited Cu2ZnSnS4 thin films: Effect of complexing agent volume. Energy Procedia 10, 255–260, doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2011.10.187 (2011). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  28. Pawar B. S., Pawar S. M., Gurav K. V. & Shin S. W. Effect of Annealing Atmosphere on the Properties of Electrochemically Deposited Cu2ZnSnS4 (CZTS) Thin Films. ISRN Renewable Energy 2011, 5, doi: 10.5402/2011/934575 (2011). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  29. Sambhaji M. P. et al. Fabrication of Cu2ZnSnS4 Thin Film Solar Cell Using Single Step Electrodeposition Method. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 51, 10NC27, doi: 10.1143/JJAP.51.10NC27 (2012). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  30. He X. et al. Quaternary co-electrodeposition of the Cu2ZnSnS4 films as potential solar cell absorbers. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 24, 572–575, doi: 10.1007/s10854-012-0813-7 (2013). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  31. Ananthoju B., Kushwaha A., Sonia F. J. & Aslam M. Structural and optical properties of electrochemically grown highly crystalline Cu2ZnSnS4 (CZTS) thin films. AIP Conf. Proc. 1512, 706–707, doi: 10.1063/1.4791233 (2013). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  32. Lee S. G. et al. Structural, morphological, compositional, and optical properties of single step electrodeposited Cu2ZnSnS4 (CZTS) thin films for solar cell application. Curr. Appl. Phys. 14, 254–258, doi: 10.1016/j.cap.2013.11.028 (2014). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  33. Slimani Tlemcani T. et al. One step electrodeposited CZTS thin films: Preparation and characterization. IRSEC’14: Solar Energy- photovoltaic, Ouarzazate, Maroc. USA: IEEE. doi: 10.1109/IRSEC.2014.7059867 89–93 (2014, October 18). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  34. Ananthoju B. et al. Improved structural and optical properties of Cu2ZnSnS4 thin films via optimized potential in single bath electrodeposition. Electrochim. Acta. 137, 154–163, doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2014.05.166 (2014). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  35. Mkawi E. M., Ibrahim K., Ali M. K. M., Farrukh M. A. & Mohamed A. S. Influence of triangle wave pulse on the properties of Cu2ZnSnS4 thin films prepared by single step electrodeposition. Sol. Energ. Mat. Sol. Cells 130, 91–98, doi: 10.1016/j.solmat.2014.06.039 (2014). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  36. Ge J. et al. A 5.5% efficient co-electrodeposited ZnO/CdS/Cu2ZnSnS4/Mo thin film solar cell. Sol. Energ. Mat. Sol. Cells 125, 20–26, doi: 10.1016/j.solmat.2014.02.020 (2014). [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES