Abstract
This prospective cohort study designed to assess the effect of folic acid supplementation in pregnancy on the risk of preeclampsia (PE) took place in Ottawa, ON and Kingston, ON, Canada, from September 1, 2002 to August 31, 2008. Pregnant women, less than 20 weeks gestational age were recruited and delivered in the Ottawa region and the Kingston General Hospital. Demographic characteristics of the study participants and the patterns of supplementation of folic acid were described and occurrence of PE between women with folic acid supplementation during pregnancy and women without were compared. Multiple logistic regression was used in the estimation of the independent effect of supplementation of folic acid. Additional analyses assessing the effect of low RBC and serum folate and dose-response relationship were performed. Analyses were performed in all study participants, and then in high risk and low risk sub-groups, respectively. A total of 7,669 participants were included in the final analysis. Ninety five percent of the study participants were taking folic acid supplementation in early second trimester. The rate of PE was lower in the supplementation group than in the no supplementation group, and the difference was statistically significant in high risk women. Similar patterns of associations were observed in analysis by RBC and serum folate levels and in dose-response analysis. Folic acid supplementation in pregnancy may reduce PE risk in pregnant women, especially in those women with increased risk of developing PE.
Introduction
Preeclampsia (PE) is hypertension that develops in pregnancy with proteinuria that affects about 5% of pregnancies [1, 2]. PE is a leading cause of maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality [3]. In an analysis of the national data of the United States, Zhang et al found that women with PE and eclampsia had a 3- to 25-fold increased risk of abruptio placentae, thrombocytopenia, disseminated intravascular coagulation, pulmonary edema, and aspiration pneumonia, and more than half of women with PE and eclampsia had cesarean delivery [4]. Since delivery is the only known cure, PE is a leading cause of indicated preterm delivery [5]. Means of gestational age were 38.3 and 35.3 weeks (as compared with 39–40 weeks in the general population), and perinatal mortality rates were 2% and 4% (as compared with 5–6 per 1,000 in the general population), respectively, in the mild and severe PE groups [6]. PE accounts for 25% of very low birth weight infants [7] and as many as 60% of these infants suffer from learning disabilities and low IQ [8]. According to our analysis of the Ontario provincial database, the cost of caring for extremely low birth weight infants in the first two years of life attributable to PE in Ontario in 2005 alone could be as high as $19 million [9].
Although the acute endothelial lesion of PE recovers during the postpartum period, women with a history of PE continue to be at risk for future vascular events. Smith et al compared outcomes between women with a history of PE and normotensive women, and suggested that PE increases the cardiovascular risk by 2- to 3-fold one year after childbirth [10]. A Norwegian birth registry identified an 8- to12-fold higher risk of cardiovascular mortality in women with a history of PE and preterm delivery as compared with normotensive women and term delivery [11]. PE may also increase the risk of cardiovascular disease in the offspring through “Developmental Origins of Health and Disease”, or “DOHaD” mechanism [12, 13]. Since no effective treatment/prevention, the impact of PE on both short- and long-term health outcomes in the affected mothers and their offspring remained important. For example, a recent study found that after controlling for potential confounding variables, the risk of maternal PE on very low birth weight (i.e., birth weight < 1,500 g) was increased (1.3, 95% confidence interval 1.2 to 1.5) in infants born between 2003 and 2006 compared with those born between 1994 and 1997 [14].
Previous studies, including our own large cohort studies [15–18], found that folic acid supplementation during pregnancy was associated with a lower incidence of PE. The objective of the proposed study was to further assess the effect of folic acid supplementation in pregnancy on PE risk in a larger birth cohort.
Methods
Details of the study procedure can be found in our previous publication [15]. In brief, this was a prospective cohort study that recruited pregnant women in Ottawa and Kingston from September 1, 2002 to August 31, 2008 (or the OaK Birth Cohort) at less than 20 weeks gestational age, and who planned to deliver in the Ottawa region and Kingston General Hospital. Patients were initially approached by a clinic nurse at an antenatal visit and were provided information about the purpose of the study. The patients were enrolled into the study after a full explanation of the study purpose and a written consent form has been obtained. The patients had blood drawn for genetic and biochemical analysis. A unique identifier/study number (in the order of entrance to the study) was assigned and was recorded on all clinical and laboratory data. In the meantime, the study nurse collected demographic and life-style data from the participating women by self-report. The delivery and other clinical data were collected within 24–72 hours post-delivery, and a chart review was conducted by the study nurse to collect additional clinical data. Folic acid supplementation (including multivitamins containing folic acid) was obtained from the participating women initially at the time of recruitment and then again at childbirth. If a data element was missing, the research nurses called the participating women within 1 week after childbirth to collect the missing data.
Laboratory investigation was performed in a sub-set of study participants (902 participants in years 2006–2008) to determine the concentrations of red blood cell (RBC) folate. Blood was drawn from the antecubital vein or from the hand of the participating women, and tested using the methods described by Branum et al [19]. Samples were assayed in batches.
PE was defined as a blood pressure greater than 140/90 mmHg on two occasions six hours apart and proteinuria greater than 2+ on dipstick or greater than 300 mg in 24 hour urine collection, supplemented by clinical symptoms and lab test results such as HELLP (hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelet count), thrombocytopenia, renal insufficiency, impaired liver function, pulmonary edema, cerebral or visual symptoms, and elevated uric acid levels, in the absence of proteinuria. To ensure the quality of diagnosis of PE, the research coordinator pulled all medical charts identified as PE or gestational hypertension. Adjudication by study investigators (SWW, MR, MW) was conducted to verify the diagnosis for all cases of PE.
We first described the demographic characteristics of the study participants and the patterns of supplementation of folic acid and other vitamins in pregnancy. We then determined the effects of folic acid supplementation on RBC folate levels. Multiple logistic regression was used in the estimation of the independent effect of supplementation of folic acid in early second trimester on PE risk. PE was the dependent variable and folic acid supplementation (yes or no, no as the reference) was the independent variable. Potential confounding variables included in the initial regression models included maternal age (<20, 20–29, 30–34, and > = 35 years, 20–29 as the reference), ethnic background (Caucasians and others, Caucasians as the reference), education (< = 6, 7 to 12, 13–15, and > = 16 years, > = 16 as the reference), parity (first and second or higher births, second or higher as the reference), previous health problems (chronic hypertension, history of preeclampsia, and diabetes, yes or no, no as the reference), pre-pregnancy body mass index (in quartile, the third quartile as reference), gestational age at recruitment, and cigarette smoking (yes and no, no as the reference). Full model with all potential confounding variables included was used in all analyses. These factors were known risk factors of PE and were also related to folic acid supplementation, although the associations may not necessarily be statistically significant in the current study sample. The effects of low RBC folate on PE risk were examined. Low RBC folate was defined as <10th percentile of each gestational week at which the blood was taken. Additional analysis assessing the dose-response relationship was performed. Doses of folic acid were calculated by the brand name of supplementation that the pregnant women were taking in early second trimester (for women with supplementation of two or more types of vitamins, folic acid contained in all vitamins was calculated) and was grouped into the following categories: 0 (no supplementation), 0.1–0.9 mg, 1.0 mg, 1.1–1.9 mg, 2.0–4.0 mg, and >4.0 mg. Analyses of the association between folic acid and PE were performed first in all study participants, and then in high risk and low risk sub-groups, respectively. High risk pregnancy was defined as the presence of any of the following conditions: pre-pregnancy body mass index > = 35, PE in a previous pregnancy, chronic hypertension, diabetes, and multiple pregnancy. Supplement analyses using serum folate and comparing the effect of folic acid on the risk of PE between women who initiated supplementation before or after conception were also conducted. All statistical analyses were performed using Statistical Analysis System, Version 9.1 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina, USA).
Results and Discussion
A total of 13,238 women were approached to participate in the study and 8,085 (61%) agreed and were recruited into the study. Among them, 416 women were excluded because of missing information such as gestational age at delivery, birth weight or sex (234) and lost to follow up due to participant’s relocation outside of study centre (182), leaving 7,669 participants for final analysis.
Ninety five percent of the study participants were taking folic acid supplementation in early second trimester; most by taking multivitamins containing folic acid at a dose of 1.0 mg or higher. The same pattern of supplementation was observed in high risk and low risk women (Table 1).
Table 1. Patterns of folic acid supplementation.
| Categories of supplementation | Frequency | Percent (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Overall participants | ||
| No supplementation | 404 | 5.27 |
| Prenatal vitamin | 5313 | 69.28 |
| Regular Multivitamins | 175 | 2.28 |
| Folic acid alone | 625 | 8.15 |
| Two or more type of vitamins | 1152 | 15.02 |
| Dose of folic acid (mg) * | ||
| 0 | 404 | 5.32 |
| 0.1–0.9 | 241 | 3.17 |
| 1 | 5834 | 76.82 |
| 1.1–1.9 | 318 | 4.19 |
| 2.0–4.0 | 673 | 8.86 |
| >4.0 | 124 | 1.63 |
| High risk pregnant women** | ||
| No supplementation | 56 | 6.36 |
| Prenatal vitamin | 564 | 64.09 |
| Regular Multivitamins | 16 | 1.82 |
| Folic acid alone | 74 | 8.41 |
| Two or more type of vitamins | 170 | 19.32 |
| Low risk of pregnant women | ||
| No supplementation | 348 | 5.13 |
| Prenatal vitamin | 4749 | 69.95 |
| Regular Multivitamins | 159 | 2.34 |
| Folic acid alone | 551 | 8.12 |
| Two or more type of vitamins | 982 | 14.46 |
*75 cases missing information on folic acid dose
** High risk of pregnancy: body mass index > = 35, previous preeclampsia history, chronic hypertension, diabetes, multiple pregnancy.
The majority of the study participants were Caucasian with high socioeconomic status. Women with no supplementation were more likely to be younger, multiparous, non-Caucasians, having a lower education level and household income, and whom smoked cigarettes during pregnancy, than women with supplementation (Table 2).
Table 2. Demographic and clinical characteristics of the pregnant women with and without folate supplementation who participated in the Oak Birth cohort study.
| Variables | No supplementation (%) | Supplementation (%) | Total | Value | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N = 404 | N = 7265 | ||||
| Maternal age (y) | |||||
| <20 | 24 5.94 | 150 2.06 | 174 | 36.48 | < .0001 |
| 20–29 | 184 45.54 | 2850 39.23 | 3034 | ||
| 30–34 | 120 29.70 | 2721 37.45 | 2841 | ||
| > = 35 | 76 18.81 | 1544 21.25 | 1620 | ||
| Maternal background | |||||
| Aboriginal | 0 0.00 | 38 0.52 | 38 | 29.11 | < .0001 |
| White | 280 69.31 | 5441 74.89 | 5721 | ||
| Middle Eastern | 12 2.97 | 171 2.35 | 183 | ||
| Africa | 15 3.71 | 76 1.05 | 91 | ||
| Asian | 19 4.70 | 342 4.71 | 361 | ||
| Other | 78 19.31 | 1197 16.48 | 1275 | ||
| Maternal background | |||||
| Causasians | 358 88.61 | 6638 91.37 | 6996 | 3.63 | 0.06 |
| Other | 46 11.39 | 627 8.63 | 673 | ||
| Prepregnancy body mass index (kg/m2) | |||||
| <18.5 | 33 8.17 | 388 5.34 | 421 | 19.59 | 0.001 |
| 18.5–24 | 193 47.77 | 4160 57.26 | 4353 | ||
| 15–29 | 97 24.01 | 1644 22.63 | 1741 | ||
| > = 30 | 47 11.63 | 661 9.10 | 708 | ||
| > = 35 | 34 8.42 | 412 5.67 | 446 | ||
| Education level | |||||
| high school and below | 122 30.27 | 999 13.76 | 1121 | 106.07 | < .0001 |
| college/university not completed | 60 14.89 | 696 9.59 | 756 | ||
| college/university completed | 221 54.84 | 5564 76.65 | 5785 | ||
| Household income ($, CAD) | |||||
| <25000 | 62 15.78 | 354 4.95 | 416 | 129.20 | < .0001 |
| 25,000–49,999 | 97 24.68 | 1094 15.29 | 1191 | ||
| 50,000–79,999 | 104 26.46 | 1986 27.75 | 2090 | ||
| > = 80,000 | 111 28.24 | 3374 47.14 | 3485 | ||
| Parity | |||||
| 0 | 125 30.94 | 3725 51.27 | 3850 | 63.29 | <0.001 |
| > = 1 | 279 69.06 | 3540 48.73 | 3819 | ||
| Smoking during pregnancy | |||||
| Yes | 80 19.80 | 793 10.92 | 873 | 29.96 | < .0001 |
| No | 324 80.20 | 6472 89.08 | 6796 | ||
| Alcohol use | |||||
| Yes | 4 0.99 | 55 0.76 | 59 | 0.27 | 0.60 |
| No | 400 99.01 | 7206 99.24 | 7606 | ||
| Chronic hypertension | |||||
| Yes | 7 1.75 | 86 1.19 | 93 | 0.98 | 0.32 |
| No | 392 98.25 | 7120 98.81 | 7512 | ||
| Type1 diabetes | |||||
| Yes | 3 0.75 | 57 0.79 | 60 | 0.01 | 0.93 |
| No | 395 99.25 | 7147 99.21 | 7542 | ||
| Type2 diabetes | |||||
| Yes | 3 0.75 | 57 0.79 | 60 | 0.01 | 0.93 |
| No | 395 99.25 | 7146 99.21 | 7541 | ||
| Previous preeclampsia | |||||
| Yes | 16 3.96 | 214 2.95 | 230 | 1.35 | 0.25 |
| No | 388 96.04 | 7044 97.05 | 7432 | ||
| Gestational age at recruitment (wks) | |||||
| < = 12 | 218 53.96 | 4241 58.38 | 4459 | 3.16 | 0.21 |
| 13–15 | 118 29.21 | 1950 26.84 | 2068 | ||
| 16–20 | 68 16.83 | 1074 14.78 | 1142 |
Folic acid supplementation was associated with increased RBC folate (Table 3). The association between supplementation and RBC folate was stronger in blood samples drawn at later gestations (Table 3).
Table 3. RBC folate levels in participants with folic acid supplementation versus those without, by gestational age at recruitment OaK Birth Cohort Study, October 2002 to December 2008.
| Variables | No Supplementation | Supplementation | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| RBC folate level(Mean ± SD, nmol/L)* | 1311.0±399.3 | 1610.3±441.1 | 0.0002 |
| RBC folate level stratified by gestational weeks at recruitment (Mean ± SD, nmol/L) | |||
| ≤ 12 | 1270.8±459.0 | 1587.7±427.9 | 0.0037 |
| 13–15 | 1322.0±381.4 | 1634.8±458.0 | 0.0211 |
| 16–20 | 1439.0±173.0 | 1776.2±487.2 | 0.1793 |
* 902 participants have the information on RBC folate level
The rate of PE was lower in the supplementation group (either supplementation with multiple vitamins containing folic acid or folic acid alone) than in the no supplementation group, and the difference was statistically significant in women with increased risk of PE (Table 4). On the other hand, no significant association between low RBC folate levels with risk of PE was found (Table 4).
Table 4. Adjusted odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95%CI) of preeclampsia.
| Variables | Number of participants | Preeclampsia (%) | ORs (95% CI)* |
|---|---|---|---|
| All women | |||
| Folic acid supplementation | |||
| No | 404 | 17 (4.21) | Reference |
| Yes | 7265 | 228 (3.14) | 0.58 (0.33, 1.02) |
| Folic acid supplementation alone | |||
| No | 404 | 17 (4.21) | Reference |
| Yes | 625 | 24 (3.84) | 0.76 (0.36, 1.62) |
| RBC folate | |||
| >10th percentile | 766 | 19 (2.48) | Reference |
| < = 10th percentile | 92 | 3 (3.26) | 1.99 (0.53, 7.38) |
| Women with high risk pregnancy** | |||
| Folic acid supplementation | |||
| No | 56 | 8 (14.29) | Reference |
| Yes | 824 | 76 (9.22) | 0.42 (0.18, 0.98) |
| Folic acid supplementation alone | |||
| No | 56 | 8 (14.29) | Reference |
| Yes | 74 | 6 (8.11) | 0.17 (0.03, 0.95) |
| RBC folate | |||
| >10th percentile | 94 | 5 (5.32) | Reference |
| < = 10th percentile | 6 | 1 (16.67) | 4.60 (0.29, 73.013) |
| Women with low risk pregnancy | |||
| Folic acid supplementation | |||
| No | 348 | 9 (2.59) | Reference |
| Yes | 6441 | 152 (2.36) | 0.75 (0.34, 1.63) |
| Folic acid supplementation alone | |||
| No | 348 | 9 (2.59) | Reference |
| Yes | 551 | 18 (3.27) | 1.35 (0.52, 3.51) |
| RBC folate | |||
| >10th percentile | 672 | 14 (2.08) | Reference |
| < = 10th percentile | 86 | 2 (2.33) | 1.55 (0.31, 7.64) |
*Adjusted for maternal age, previous health problem (chronic hypertension, history of preeclampsia, diabetes), smoking, and parity.
** High risk of pregnancy: body mass index > = 35, previous preeclampsia history, chronic hypertension, diabetes, multiple pregnancy.
No statistically significant dose-response relationship between folic acid supplementation and the risk of PE (P > 0.05 for trend test) was found (Table 5).
Table 5. Occurrences of PE according to folate dose groups.
| Dose group (mg) | Number of participants | Number of Preeclampsia | Rate of PE (%) | χ2 | P value* |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All cases | |||||
| 0 | 404 | 17 | 4.21 | ||
| 0.1–0.9 | 241 | 6 | 2.49 | ||
| 1 | 5834 | 175 | 3.00 | 7.81 | 0.32 |
| 1.1–1.9 | 318 | 13 | 4.09 | ||
| 2.0–4.0 | 673 | 24 | 3.57 | ||
| > = 4.0 | 124 | 8 | 6.45 | ||
| Women with high risk pregnancy | |||||
| 0 | 56 | 8 | 14.29 | ||
| 0.1–0.9 | 24 | 2 | 8.33 | ||
| 1 | 629 | 55 | 8.74 | 0.37 | 0.98 |
| 1.1–1.9 | 42 | 5 | 11.90 | ||
| 2.0–4.0 | 92 | 13 | 14.13 | ||
| >4.0 | 26 | 1 | 3.85 | ||
| Women with low risk pregnancy | |||||
| 0 | 348 | 9 | 2.59 | ||
| 0.1–0.9 | 217 | 4 | 1.84 | ||
| 1 | 5205 | 120 | 2.31 | 11.00 | 0.37 |
| 1.1–1.9 | 276 | 8 | 2.90 | ||
| 2.0–4.0 | 581 | 11 | 1.89 | ||
| >4.0 | 98 | 7 | 7.14 |
* P value for Cochran-Armitage trend test
Similar patterns were found for women with different serum folate concentrations and no difference in the effect of folic acid on the risk of PE between women who initiated supplementation before or after conception was found (Table 6).
Table 6. Association between serum folate concentration and PE and according time of folic acid supplementation.
| n of subjects | n of PE cases | % | P | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Serum folate | > 0.05 | |||
| >10th percentile | 6,803 | 211 | 3.10 | |
| < = 10th percentile | 747 | 28 | 3.75 | |
| Initiation time of supplementation | ||||
| Before conception | 3,034 | 96 | 3.16 | > 0.05 |
| After conception | 4,018 | 127 | 3.16 |
Main findings
Our prospective study in a cohort of Canadian women found that about 95% had supplementation with folic acid or multivitamins containing folic acid in early second trimester, and among them, most had a supplementation of 1.0 mg or higher. Supplementation of multivitamins containing folic acid was associated with a lower rate of PE, and the results were statistically significant in women with increased risk of developing PE. Although some of the differences were not statistically significant, the patterns in point estimates in different analyses were quite consistent: by overall supplementation, by RBC folate concentrations, in overall study participants, or in participants with high risk pregnancy and participants with low risk pregnancy.
Strengths and limitations
Our study was designed to test a biologically plausible hypothesis in a large prospective cohort of women, with fairly detailed information on folic acid supplementation and clinical data, allowing refined analysis. All cases of PE were adjudicated by study investigators so errors in ascertainment of outcome were reduced. In addition to supplementation data, we measured RBC and serum folate levels.
A major limitation of our study is that the non-supplementation was rare (5%) during the study period. Such a low non-supplementation rate could result in major selection bias and confounding difficult to be controlled for in observational studies. RBC folate level was measured only in a selected subset of participants (902 participants in years 2006–2008). Although overall study sample was fairly large, the power of the study was limited because the number of non-supplementation was small and the event rate was low. Because of the high supplementation rate, only 3.35% of the study subjects were folate insufficient according to the World Health Organization standard for women in reproductive age (folate concentration < 15.9 nmol/L) [20]. We calculated the powers for three set of analysis and they are all indeed low: the power for folate supplementation was only 25%, for RBC folate level it was 10%, and for serum folate level it was 18%. The issue of limited sample size is severe in important sub-analyses as the sample diminished rapidly because of the need to stratify by risk status and by doses in these analyses.
Interpretation
The finding of significant reduction in PE risk associated with folic acid supplementation in women with increased risk of developing PE was consistent with our Phase I of OaK Birth Cohort study which included 2,951 participants recruited from The Ottawa Hospital and Kingston General Hospital between October 2002 and December 2005, which found a statistically significant lower rate of PE in the supplementation group than in the no supplementation group (aOR of 0.37 and 95% CI of 0.18, 0.75) [15]. Several earlier studies by other groups also found that folic acid supplementation reduced the risk of PE [17, 18]. In a large population based historical cohort study, we found that the risks of PE (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 1.52, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 1.39, 1.66) and severe PE (OR: 1.77, 95% CI: 1.38, 2.28) were increased in mothers with folic acid antagonists exposure [16]. Folic acid antagonists include a broad spectrum of drugs with a common mechanism of depleting maternal folate. Findings from the effect of maternal exposure to folic acid antagonists on the increased risk of PE added to the weight of evidence that folic acid supplementation may decrease the risk of PE. Moreover, folic acid supplementation was found to be associated with several other adverse pregnancy outcomes such as placental abruption [21, 22], fetal loss [21], and fetal growth restriction [21, 23] that are considered to share the same mechanism of placental pathology by Ray and Laskin [24]. Nilsen et al analyzed data from 280,127 singletons collected by Medical Birth Registry of Norway and found that compared with no folic acid supplementation, any supplementation was associated with a 26% risk reduction of placental abruption (adjusted OR = 0.74, 95% CI 0.65, 0.84) [25]. Plasma or serum homocysteine is strongly associated with folate intake, with increased homocysteine levels associated with lower folate intake. Vollset et al analyzed the association between plasma homocysteine and PE, and found that the adjusted risk for PE was 32% higher in women with upper quartile of plasma homocysteine level as compared with women with lower quartile [26]. On the other hand, a recent large cohort study involving 5,593 pregnant women, which showed no effect of folic acid on PE or gestational hypertension [27]. There are a couple of reasons that may explain the discrepant results from different studies. First, in recent studies in industrialized countries, non-supplementation became very rare. In our Phase I OaK Birth Cohort study, about 8% women had no supplementation of folic acid (15). In Phase 2 of the Oak Birth Cohort (the current cohort), which was the expansion of the Phase I OaK Birth Cohort, 5,000 additional participants were recruited and added to Phase 1, and the overall non-supplementation rate dropped to 5%. The non-supplementation rate in the Timmermans study was also about 5% [27]. When the rate of non-supplementation became rare, the reasons for non-supplementation may be highly selective. As a result, selection bias/confounding may become difficult to detect and control. Second, the association between folic acid supplementation and PE may depend on the risk profile of the study population. Couple of studies found that folic acid supplementation can lower the risk of PE only in lean women [17, 28]. We speculate that this may be caused by the dose problem, as in both the Bodnar’s [17] and Catov’s [28] studies, most women had supplementation of 0.4 mg per day. In our cohort, most women had supplementation of 1 mg per day. Because of the potential genetic and metabolic defects, women with increased risk may need a higher dose [29–31]. In our study, we tested the hypothesis that a high dose of folic acid supplementation may be needed for women with increased risk of PE by analyzing data for a subset sample of women with pre-pregnancy body mass index > = 35, previous PE history, chronic hypertension, diabetes, or multiple pregnancy. The results of analyses in women with increased risk of developing PE were statistically significant, may be because high dose folic acid is truly beneficial to these women.
Conclusion
In this large prospective cohort study, we found that folic acid supplementation in pregnancy was associated with reduced risk of PE, although the association was statistically significant only in women with increased risk of developing PE. Large scale randomized controlled trials to definitively prove or disprove the effect of folic acid supplementation in pregnancy on PE, are urgently needed.
Acknowledgments
Dr. Wen is a recipient of Mid-Career Investigator of CIHR Institute for Gender& Health and Ontario Women’s Health Council. Dr. Walker is Tier I Clinical Research Chair in perinatal health of the University of Ottawa. We would like to acknowledge the following people who without their commitment and expertise, this project would not have been possible. The OMNI Research Nurse Group (Ottawa & Lucy Chura, RN BScN Study Coordinator, QPRU Research Team (Queen’s Perinatal Research Unit Kingston and Lizy Kodiattu, MD), Dr. George Tawagi and team (Ottawa Hospital-Civic Campus) and Carol Ann Jodouin, Dept of Laboratory Medicine–Ottawa Hospital.
Data Availability
Data are from the OaK Birth Cohort and may be accessed by request through the Ottawa Hospital Research Institute and its Ethics Board.
Funding Statement
This study was supported by a grant from the Canadian Institute for Health Research (grant #MOP 82802).
References
- 1.ACOG Task Force on Hypertension in Pregnancy. Obstetrics and Gynecology 2013. 122(1122–31). 10.1097/01.AOG.0000437382.03963.88 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Magee LA, Helewa M, Moutquin JM, von Dadelszen P; Hypertension Guideline Committee; Strategic Training Initiative in Research in the Reproductive Health Sciences (STIRRHS) Scholars. Diagnosis, evaluation, and management of the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada 2008; 30((Suppl 1):S1–S48).18817592 [Google Scholar]
- 3.Roberts JM, Lain KY. Recent Insights into the pathogenesis of pre-eclampsia. Placenta 2002; 23(359.–) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Zhang J, Meikle S, Trumble A. Severe maternal morbidity associated with hypertensive disorders in pregnancy in the United States. Hypertension in Pregnancy 2003; 22 (203–12). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Vogel JP1, Lee AC, Souza JP . Maternal morbidity and preterm birth in 22 low- and middle-income countries: a secondary analysis of the WHO Global Survey dataset. BMC Pregnancy & Childbirth 2014. January 31; 14(56). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Peek MJ, Horvath JS, Child AG, Henderson-Smart DJ, Peat B, Gillin A. Maternal and neonatal outcome of patients classified according to the Australasian Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy Consensus Statement. The Medical Journal of Australia 1995; 162(186.–). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ales KL, Frayer W, Hawks G, Auld PM, Druzin ML. Development and validation of a multivariate predictor of mortality in very low birth weight. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 1988; 41(1095–103). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Whitfield MF, Grunau RV, Holsti L. Extremely premature (< = 800 g) schoolchildren: multiple areas of hidden disability. ADC Fetal & Neonatal edition 1997. 77(85F–90F). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Liu A, Wen SW, Bottomly J, Walker MC, Smith G. Utilization of health care services of pregnant women complicated by preeclampsia in Ontario. Hypertension in Pregnancy 2009: 28(76–84). 10.1080/10641950802366252 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Smith GN, Walker MC, Liu A, Wen SW, Swansburg M, Ramshaw H, et al. Pre-Eclampsia New Emerging Team (PE-NET). A history of preeclampsia identifies women who have underlying cardiovascular risk factors. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2009; 200(58e1-8). 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.06.035 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Irgens HU, Reisaeter L, Irgens LM, Lie RT. Long term mortality of mothers and fathers after pre-eclampsia: population based cohort study. BMJ 2001; 323(7323) (1213–7). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Barker DJP, Osmond C, Winter PD, Margetts B, Simmonds SJ. Weight in infancy and death from ischaemic heart disease. Lancet 1989; ii(577–80). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Dekker GA, Sibai BM. Etiology and pathogenesis of pre-eclampsia: current concepts. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1998;179(1359–75). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Paul DA, Mackley A, Locke RG, Ehrenthal D, Hoffman M, Kroelinger C. Increased preeclampsia in mothers delivering very low-birth-weight infants between 1994 and 2006. American Journal of Perinatology 2009; 26(6)(467–72). 10.1055/s-0029-1214246 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Wen SW, Chen XK, Rodger M, White RR, Yang Q, Smith GN, et al. Folic acid supplementation in early second trimester and the risk of preeclampsia. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2008; 198(45e1-7). 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.06.067 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Wen SW, Zhou J, Yang Q, Fraser W, Olatunbosun O, Walker M. Maternal exposure to folic acid antagonists and placenta-mediated adverse pregnancy outcomes. Canadian Medical Association Journal 2008; 179(1263–8). 10.1503/cmaj.080859 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Bodnar LM, Tang G, Ness RB, Harger G, Roberts JM. Periconceptional multivitamin use reduces the risk of pre-eclampsia. American Journal of Epidemiology 2006; 164(470–7). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Hernandez-Diaz S, Werler MM, Louik C, Mitchell AA. Risk of gestational hypertension in relation to folic acid supplementation during pregnancy. American Journal of Epidemiology 2002; 156(806–812). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Branum AM, Bailey R, Singer BJ. Dietary supplement use and folate status during pregnancy in the United States. Journal of Nutrition 2013; 143(486–92). 10.3945/jn.112.169987 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.WHO. Optimal serum and red blood cell folate concentrations in women of reproductive age for prevention of neural tube defects Geneva: World Health Organization, 2015. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.de la Calle M, Usandizaga R, Sancha M, Magdaeno F, Herranz A, Cabrillo E. Homocystine. folic acid and B-group vitamins in obstetrics and gynaecology. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 2003; 107(125–134). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Kupferminc MJ, Eldor A, Steiman N, Many A, Bar-Am A, Jaffa A, et al. Increased frequency of genetic thrombophiliain women with complications of pregnancy. New England Journal of Medicine 1999;340: 9–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Goldenberg RL, Tamura T, Cliver SP, Cutter GR, Hoffman HJ, Copper RL. Serum folate and fetal growth retardation: a matter of compliance? Obstetrics & Gynecology 1992; 79(5 (pt 1)(719–722). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Ray JG, Laskin C. Folic acid and homocycteine metabolic defects and the risk of placental abruption, pre-eclampsia and spontaneous pregnancy loss: a systematic review. Placenta 1999; 20(519–29). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Nilsen RM, Vollset SE, Rasmussen SA, Ueland PM, Daltveit AK.Folic acid and multivitamin supplement use and risk of placental abruption: a population-based registry study. American Journal of Epidemiology 2008. April;167(7):867–74. 10.1093/aje/kwm373 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Vollset SE, Refsum H, Irgens LM, Emblem BM, Tverdal A, Gjessing HK, et al. Plasma total homocysteine, pregnancy complications, and adverse pregnancy outcomes: the Hordaland Homocysteine study. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2000. April;71 (4): 962–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Timmermans S, Jaddoe VW, Silva LM, Hofman A, Raat H, Steegers-Theunissen RP. Folic acid is positively associated with uteroplacental vascular resistance: the Generation R study. Nutrition, Metabolism & Cardiovascular Diseases 2011; 21(54–61). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Catov JM, Nohr EA, Bodnar LM, Knudson VK, Olsen SF, Olsen J. Association of periconceptional multivitamin use with reduced risk of preeclampsia among normal-weight women in the Danish National Birth Cohort. American Journal of Epidemiology 2009; 169(1304–11). 10.1093/aje/kwp052 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Keating E, Gonçalves P, Campos I, Costa F, Martel F. Folic acid uptake by the human syncytiotrophoblast: interference by pharmacotherapy, drugs of abuse and pathological conditions. Reproductive Toxicology 2009; 28(511–20). 10.1016/j.reprotox.2009.07.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Sen S, Iyer C, Meydani SN. Obesity during pregnancy alters maternal oxidant balance and micronutrient status. Journal of Perinatology 2014; 34(105–11). 10.1038/jp.2013.153 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Yaremco E, Inglis A, Innis SM, Hippman C, Carrion P, Lamers Y, et al. Red blood cell folate levels in pregnant women with a history of mood disorders: a case series. Birth Defects Research A Clinical and Molecular Teratology 2013; 97(416–20). 10.1002/bdra.23144 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Data are from the OaK Birth Cohort and may be accessed by request through the Ottawa Hospital Research Institute and its Ethics Board.