Abstract
The majority of cardiac fibroblasts in a mature mammalian heart are derived from the epicardium during prenatal development and reactivate developmental programs during the progression of fibrotic disease. In addition, epicardial activation, proliferation, and fibrosis occur with ischemic, but not hypertensive injury. Here we review cellular and molecular mechanisms that control epicardium-derived cell lineages during development and disease with a focus on cardiac fibroblasts. This article is part of a special issue entitled “Fibrosis and Myocardial Remodeling”.
Keywords: Cardiac fibrosis, epicardium, fibroblast lineage, myocardial infarction
1. Introduction
Cardiac fibrosis occurs in the context of multiple cardiac stresses including myocardial infarction (MI), hypertensive heart disease (HHD), diabetes, and aging [1, 2]. Fibrosis is characterized by increased deposition of extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins, notably fibrillar collagen, which can lead to progressive stiffening, loss of systolic function, and ultimately heart failure [3]. There is emerging evidence that the localization and cell types involved in cardiac fibrosis are distinct, depending on the type of stress exerted on the heart [4]. Activation of the epicardial layer of the heart occurs with cardiac injury, such as MI, but is less apparent in hypertensive heart disease [4, 5]. Recent studies demonstrate that the embryonic epicardium is the predominant source of cardiac fibroblasts (CFs), including those activated during pathologic fibrogenesis [6, 7]. Likewise, regulatory programs that promote the cardiac fibroblast lineage development are reactivated in the adult cardiac fibrotic response, not only in the epicardium, but also in interstitial and perivascular adventitial cardiac fibroblasts [4, 5]. Thus the epicardium and epicardial developmental regulatory mechanisms are integral to the initiation and progression of cardiac fibrotic disease.
2. Epicardial development and origins of cardiac fibroblasts
In the developing vertebrate heart, the epicardium is formed with the growth of mesothelial proepicardial progenitors arising at venous and arterial poles of the looped heart [8]. Formation of the epicardial cell layer on the surface of the ventricles is apparent beginning at Embryonic day (E)10.5 in mice, E3 in chick, and during the fourth week of gestation in human embryos [9, 10] [11]. A subset of epicardial epithelial cells undergoes an epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and invades the adjacent myocardium, while others remain on the surface of the heart (Figure 1) [12–14]. Fate mapping and cell lineage studies from the 1990s demonstrated that epicardium-derived cells (EPDCs) differentiate into cardiac fibroblasts and vascular smooth muscle cells of the mature heart [9, 15, 16]. More recent Cre-recombinase-based lineage and cell sorting studies in mice demonstrate that adult cardiac fibroblasts activated with disease are primarily derived from the developing epicardium [6, 7].
Figure 1. Generation of cardiac fibroblasts in development and disease.
During embryonic development, epicardium-derived cells (EPDCs) invade the myocardium and differentiate into cardiac fibroblasts (blue cells) and vascular smooth muscle cells (pink cells; Left panel). After myocardial infarction (MI), the epicardium is activated and undergoes epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT), producing increased numbers of subepicardial cells expressing developmental transcription factors Tcf21, Wt1, and Tbx18 with increased collagen deposition (blue background) on the surface of the heart. With hypertensive injury (HI), perivascular adventitial fibrosis (blue) occurs surrounding coronary arteries. Interstitial fibrosis (blue) is apparent with both MI and HI.
Multiple cell signaling pathways regulate epicardial EMT, migration, lineage determination, and differentiation. Transforming growth factor β (TGFβ) signaling promotes epicardial EMT, and initiation of epicardial EMT involves Bone Morphogenetic Protein 2 (BMP2) signaling through Type III Transforming Growth Factor β receptor 3 (TGFβR3) [17]. Epicardial EMT also is dependent on Wnt/β-catenin signaling, and β-catenin is required for oriented cell division and delamination of epithelial cells from the epicardium [12, 13]. Platelet derived growth factor (PDGF) signaling through either PDGFRα or β is required for epicardial EMT, while cardiac fibroblast cell lineage determination and differentiation are dependent specifically on PDGFRα [18, 19]. Calcineurin signaling and NFATc1 activity promote invasion of EPDCs into the myocardium [14]. Likewise TGFβ signaling and Myocardin-related transcription factors (MRTFs) also are required for migration of EPDCs and subsequent development of coronary vessels and fibroblast lineages [20, 21]. Retinoic acid (RA) signaling is active in EPDCs on the surface of the heart, and RA treatment inhibits smooth muscle differentiation of EPDCs [22]. Together, these signaling pathways coordinate the initial generation of EPDCs, as well as control the differentiation and maturation of multiple cell types in the developing heart, including cardiac fibroblasts.
The transcription factors Wt1, Tbx18, and Tcf21 are expressed in the epicardium and EPDCs [23]. Differential regulation of these factors is apparent in specific activation of Wt1 and Tcf21, but not Tbx18, by RA signaling in subepicardial mesenchyme [22]. Wt1 has a critical role in epicardial EMT through regulation of Wnt/β-catenin and Snail transcription factors [13, 24, 25]. Thus Wt1 is necessary for the initial formation of EPDCs, but its expression is downregulated after migration into the myocardium [13]. Tcf21 expression in EPDCs is maintained after they invade the myocardium, and it represses smooth muscle differentiation while activating cardiac fibroblast lineage development [22, 26]. Cre-based lineage studies demonstrate that derivatives of EPDCs expressing Wt1, Tbx18, or Tcf21 differentiate into fibroblasts and vascular smooth muscle cells [27–29]. While contribution of EPDCs to endothelial cells and cardiomyocytes has been a matter of contention, there is agreement that Wt1, Tbx18, and Tcf21 reliably mark cardiac fibroblast and smooth muscle progenitors that arise from the embryonic epicardium.
3. Location, cellular contributions, and progression of cardiac fibrosis
Cardiac fibrosis results from increased cell proliferation, myofibroblast activation, and synthesis of collagen and matrix remodeling enzymes in cardiac fibroblasts [3]. Investigation of the sources and activation mechanisms of cardiac fibroblasts has been an active area of recent research. The prenatal epicardium is the main source of cardiac fibroblasts in the developing heart with additional contributions from endothelial-derived endocardial cushions [9, 30]. Cell lineage and sorting studies in mice demonstrate that resident fibroblasts generated from epicardial-lineages are the predominant cells that promote adult fibrosis after pressure overload [6, 7]. With cardiac ischemic injury, bone marrow-derived cells infiltrate the area of injury and contribute to scarring, but EPDCs generated during embryogenesis (Wt1Cre lineage) are the main source of fibroblasts that contribute to pathologic ventricular remodeling and fibrosis [31]. Generation of new fibroblasts in adults via EMT from the adult epicardium [32] and vascular endothelium [33] also has been reported. These cell lineage studies are limited by narrow identification of fibroblasts as defined by a collagen1GFP transgene or combinations of cell surface markers, and the full complement of activated myofibroblasts after cardiac injury may include additional cellular origins [34]. However, there is increasing evidence that cardiac fibroblasts originally derived from the embryonic epicardium are primary mediators of cardiac fibrotic disease.
The localization of cardiac fibrosis is distinct depending on the initial cause of disease (Figure 1). Activation of the epicardium and deposition of increased ECM on the epicardial surface of the heart are prevalent with MI and ischemic injury in mice, dogs, and humans [4, 5, 31]. Interestingly epicardial activation occurs both in the area of injury and also in regions remote from injury, supporting a widespread epicardial injury response with certain cardiac stresses. In contrast, perivascular cardiac fibrosis is prevalent under hypertensive conditions, such as pressure overload, while widespread epicardial activation is not observed [4]. Fibroblast activation and increased collagen deposition in the myocardial interstitium are observed with multiple cardiac insults and likely are significant factors in decreased myocardial function and heart failure with fibrosis resulting from a variety of causes. The underlying mechanisms for epicardial activation with ischemic injury and perivascular fibrosis with pressure overload are not known, but could have implications for treatment of fibrotic heart disease of different origins.
4. Epicardial activation with myocardial infarction
In a normal adult heart, the epicardium and subepicardium are a few cell layers thick. After MI or ischemia/reperfusion injury, the number of cells in the epicardium and subepicardial space on the surface of the injured heart is dramatically increased. In mice the epicardial thickness is increased by >6-fold, and collagen deposition surrounding the heart is greatly increased 7d after ischemia/reperfusion injury [4]. In human and dog hearts after MI, increased numbers of subepicardial cells are apparent, in addition to increased epicardial adipose deposition that is not observed in rodents [4, 5]. Within a week after MI in mice, new EPDCs are generated by epicardial EMT and increased cell proliferation of epicardial cells [5]. This epicardial activation is organ-wide, even in areas remote from injury. Interestingly a similar epicardial activation response occurs in adult zebrafish after cardiac injury and precedes regeneration of the myocardium [35]. While adult mammals have lost the ability to robustly regenerate the myocardium after injury, epicardial activation after injury has been retained. The study of reparative or regenerative functions of activated EPDCs after cardiac injury in mammals is currently an active area of research [36, 37].
Epicardial activation after cardiac injury recapitulates EPDC development during embryogenesis [23]. EMT of the epicardial epithelium is induced, as indicated by expression of Twist1 and Snail1/2, activation of BMP and TGFβ signaling, as well as assumption of mesenchymal morphology in culture [4, 5]. The majority of cells in the thickened subepicardial space are derived from the epicardium, as indicated by lineage tracing with tamoxifen-inducible Wt1CreER or infection with an epicardial-specific mesothelin (Msln)-Cre adenovirus [5]. In addition, RA, Notch, and Wnt1/β-catenin signaling are upregulated in the activated epicardium and newly generated EPDCs [5, 32, 38]. Expression of EPDC transcription factors Wt1, Tbx18, and Tcf21 also is induced in subepicardial cells within a week after injury [4, 5]. The newly generated EPDCs, together with bone marrow-derived cells, contribute to scar formation in the infarcted area [31]. Unlike embryonic EPDCs, adult EPDCs generated after injury largely remain on the surface of the heart, as indicated by fate mapping and cell lineage tracing [5]. However, newly generated EPDCs in adult injured hearts differentiate predominantly into smooth muscle and cardiac fibroblast lineages similar to embryonic EPDCs [4, 5]. Adult EPDCs also secrete multiple angiogenic factors, including VEGFA and FGF2, that can improve cardiac function and reduce scar formation during the cardiac injury response [5].
5. Epicardial developmental pathways activated in cardiac fibroblasts and potential therapeutics
Activation of resident cardiac fibroblasts is apparent in the epicardium, myocardial interstitium, and/or perivascular adventitia during cardiac fibrosis resulting from various pathologic stimuli. The differential localization of cardiac fibrosis with ischemic injury or pressure overload is likely due to distinct populations of infiltrating cells and acute injury response after MI in contrast to biomechanical stimulation of perivascular fibroblasts with hypertensive disease [39, 40]. Human and mouse interstitial CFs in fibrotic hearts express EPDC transcription factors Wt1, Tcf21, and Tbx18, which are differentially regulated in development and also in cardiac fibrotic disease resulting from ischemia or hypertension [4, 23, 31]. Wt1 and Tbx18, expressed early in epicardial lineage development, are preferentially expressed in epicardial and interstitial, but not perivascular fibrosis [4, 13]. In contrast, Tcf21 has a more specific role in fibroblast lineage development and is induced in epicardial, interstitial, and perivascular fibrosis in response to ischemic injury or pressure overload [4, 22, 26]. Lineage tracing with tamoxifen-inducible Cre lines supports widespread activation of Tcf21-derived fibroblasts after pressure overload or MI, whereas Wt1-derived fibroblasts are preferentially activated with ischemic injury but not angiotensin II-induced pressure overload [29, 31](Xiang, Fang, Yutzey unpublished data). Thus, transcriptional regulatory mechanisms that control EPDC lineages during development also are active in the adult fibrotic response, but exhibit differential induction depending on the nature of cardiac injury.
Multiple signaling mechanisms that control the initial formation and differentiation of EPDCs in the developing embryo are reactivated with fibrotic disease and have been targeted therapeutically. TGFβ signaling is activated with cardiac fibrosis and has a critical role in myofibroblast activation and cell migration, as has been demonstrated in epicardial EMT [21]. Likewise, inhibition of TGFβ or BMP signaling, required for EPDC development, ameliorates cardiac fibrosis in animal models [41–44]. Cardiomyocyte-specific expression of human stem cell factor also induces epicardial EMT, with increased TGFβ signaling and Wt1 expression, leading to increased myocardial arteriogenesis after MI [45]. During acute cardiac ischemic injury, activation of Wnt/β-catenin signaling is apparent in epicardium, but its role in fibrosis, especially with pressure overload, has not been fully characterized [32]. Interestingly, therapeutic inhibition of Wnt/β-catenin signaling can suppress fibrosis induced by MI in mice [43, 46]. Additional studies are necessary to define the inductive mechanisms and crosstalk among different pathways in interstitial CFs that lead to activation and progression of fibrosis. These developmental mechanisms represent attractive therapeutic targets for cardiac fibrosis and adverse remodeling that have not yet been fully explored.
6. Perspectives and conclusions
The specific functions and contributions of epicardial fibroblasts activated during adulthood by ischemic injury are not fully known, but could be beneficial. Activated epicardial cells secrete angiogenic factors and can promote arteriogenesis after MI [5, 45]. Epicardial activation can be enhanced by treatment with Thymosin β4, which enhances neoangiogenesis and generation of new cardiomyocytes after MI [47, 48]. EPDCs that arise in adulthood after MI are heterogeneous and distinct from progenitor populations that arise during development [49]. Multiple epicardium-derived stem cell populations have been described that could have beneficial effects on vascularization or remodeling of the injured myocardium [49, 50]. Follistatin-like1 (FSTL1) has been identified as a factor secreted from epicardial cells that, when delivered via an epicardial patch, promotes resident cardiomyocyte proliferation after MI in swine [51]. Therefore, fibroblasts, as indicated by increased collagen expression, that are derived from injury-induced epicardial expansion might be inherently different from those amplified in the interstitium or perivascular adventitia after injury. It is possible that these activated epicardial cells have reparative functions after cardiac injury as has been observed during zebrafish heart regeneration.
Recent studies have demonstrated that resident cardiac fibroblasts that arose from the epicardium during development are the major source collagen-producing activated fibroblasts in hypertensive injury in mice [6, 7]. The fibrotic response induced by hypertensive injury causes adverse myocardial remodeling and can eventually lead to heart failure. Therapeutic interventions in animal models of heart failure and fibrosis have targeted signaling pathways implicated in cardiac fibroblast development [41, 43, 46]. An interesting observation from these therapeutic studies is that reduced cardiac fibrosis is accompanied by improved cardiac function supporting paracrine interactions between pathogenic fibroblasts and cardiomyocytes [41, 43, 46]. However, whether these pathways work together or in parallel in the progression of fibrosis is not known. It is also unclear whether these beneficial interventions are dependent on the type of injury, cell types involved in fibrosis, or stage of treatment. Therefore, it is important to consider potential differences among epicardial, perivascular, and interstitial fibrotic responses when developing antifibrotic therapeutic strategies.
Supplementary Material
Highlights.
Fibroblasts derived from embryonic epicardium contribute to cardiac fibrosis
Epicardial developmental pathways are active in adult fibrotic heart disease
Epicardial activation and fibrosis occurs with myocardial infarction.
Cardiac fibrosis is differentially localized with ischemic and hypertensive injury
Acknowledgements
We thank members of the Yutzey lab for critical reading of the manuscript. Grant support was provided by NIH/NHLBI P01HL069779, R01HL082716, and R01HL094319 to K.E.Y.; AHA13PRE16410009 to M.F.; AHA15POST22060001 to F-L.X.
Abbreviations
- (MI)
Myocardial Infarction
- (HHD)
Hypertensive heart disease
- (HI)
Hypertensive Injury
- (ECM)
Extracellular matrix
- (CF)
Cardiac fibroblast
- (EMT)
epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition
- (EndMT)
endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition
- (EPDCs)
epicardium-derived cells
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
Disclosures None
References
- [1].Brown RD, Ambler SK, Mitchell MD, Long CS. The cardiac fibroblast: therapeutic target in myocardial remodeling and failure. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2005;45:657–87. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.45.120403.095802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [2].Roger VL, Go AS, Lloyd-Jones DM, Benjamin EJ, Berry JD, Borden WB, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics--2012 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2012;125:e2–e220. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e31823ac046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [3].Kong P, Christia P, Frangogiannis NG. The pathogenesis of cardiac fibrosis. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2014;71:549–74. doi: 10.1007/s00018-013-1349-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [4].Braitsch CM, Kanisicak O, van Berlo JH, Molkentin JD, Yutzey KE. Differential expression of embryonic epicardial progenitor markers and localization of cardiac fibrosis in adult ischemic injury and hypertensive heart disease. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2013;65:108–19. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2013.10.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [5].Zhou B, Honor LB, He H, Ma Q, Oh JH, Butterfield C, et al. Adult mouse epicardium modulates myocardial injury by secreting paracrine factors. J Clin Invest. 2011;121:1894–904. doi: 10.1172/JCI45529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [6].Moore-Morris T, Guimaraes-Camboa N, Banerjee I, Zambon AC, Kisseleva T, Velayoudon A, et al. Resident fibroblast lineages mediate pressure overload-induced cardiac fibrosis. J Clin Invest. 2014;124:2921–34. doi: 10.1172/JCI74783. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [7].Ali SR, Ranjbarvaziri A, Talkhabi M, Zhao P, Subat A, Hojjat A, et al. Developmental heterogeneity of cardiac fibroblasts does not predict pathological proliferation and activation. Circ Res. 2014;115:625–35. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.115.303794. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [8].Gittenberger-de Groot AC, Winter EM, Bartelings MM, Goumans MJ, DeRuiter MC, Poelmann RE. The arterial and cardiac epicardium in development, disease and repair. Differentiation; research in biological diversity. 2012;84:41–53. doi: 10.1016/j.diff.2012.05.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [9].Gittenberger-de Groot AC, Vrancken Peeters MP, Mentink MM, Gourdie RG, Poelmann RE. Epicardium-derived cells contribute a novel population to the myocardial wall and the atrioventricular cushions. Circ Res. 1998;82:1043–52. doi: 10.1161/01.res.82.10.1043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [10].Lie-Venema H, van den Akker NM, Bax NA, Winter EM, Maas S, Kekarainen T, et al. Origin, fate, and function of epicardium-derived cells (EPCDs) in normal and abnormal cardiac development. ScientificWorldJournal. 2007;7:1777–98. doi: 10.1100/tsw.2007.294. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [11].Risebro CA, Vieira JM, Riley PR. Characterisation of the human embryonic and foetal epicardium during heart development. Development. 2015;142 doi: 10.1242/dev.127621. In press. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [12].Wu M, Smith CL, Hall JA, Lee I, Luby-Phelps K, Tallquist MD. Epicardial spindle orientation controls cell entry into the myocardium. Dev Cell. 2010;19:114–25. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2010.06.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [13].von Gise A, Zhou B, Honor LB, Ma Q, Petryk A, Pu WT. WT1 regulates epicardial epithelial to mesenchymal transition through beta-catenin and retinoic acid signaling pathways. Dev Biol. 2011;356:421–31. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2011.05.668. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [14].Combs MD, Braitsch CM, Lange AW, James JF, Yutzey KE. NFATC1 promotes epicardium-derived cell invasion into myocardium. Development. 2011;138:1747–57. doi: 10.1242/dev.060996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [15].Mikawa T, Gourdie RG. Pericardial mesoderm generates a population of coronary smooth muscle cells migrating into the heart along with ingrowth of the epicardial organ. Dev Biol. 1996;174:221–32. doi: 10.1006/dbio.1996.0068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [16].Dettman RW, Denetclaw W, Jr., Ordahl CP, Bristow J. Common epicardial origin of coronary vascular smooth muscle, perivascular fibroblasts, and intermyocardial fibroblasts in the avian heart. Dev Biol. 1998;193:169–81. doi: 10.1006/dbio.1997.8801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [17].Hill CR, Sanchez NS, Love JD, Arrieta JA, Hong CC, Brown CB, et al. BMP2 signals loss of epithelial character in epicardial cells but requires the Type III TGFb receptor to promote invasion. Cell Signalling. 2012;24:1012–22. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2011.12.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [18].Smith CL, Baek ST, Sung CY, Tallquist MD. Epicardial-derived cell epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and fate specification require PDGF receptor signaling. Circ Res. 2011;108:e15–26. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.110.235531. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [19].Rudat C, Norden J, Taketo MM, Kispert A. Epicardial function of canonical Wnt-, Hedgehog-, Fgfr1/2-, and Pdgfra signalling. Cardiovasc Res. 2013;100:411–21. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvt210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [20].Trembley MA, Velasquez LS, de Mesy Bentley KL, Small EM. Myocardin-related transcription factors control the motility of epicardium-derived cells and the maturation of coronary vessels. Development. 2015;142:21–30. doi: 10.1242/dev.116418. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [21].Small EM, Lighthouse JK. Transcriptional control of cardiac fibroblast plasticity. 2016;xx doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2015.12.016. in press, JMC9591. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [22].Braitsch CM, Combs MD, Quaggin SE, Yutzey KE. Pod1/Tcf21 is regulated by retinoic acid signaling and inhibits differentiation of epicardium-derived cells into smooth muscle in the developing heart. Dev Biol. 2012;368:345–57. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2012.06.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [23].Braitsch CM, Yutzey KE. Transcriptional control of cell lineage development in epicardium-derived cells. Journal of Developmental Biology. 2013;1 doi: 10.3390/jdb1020092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [24].Martinez-Estrada OM, Lettice LA, Essafi A, Guadix JA, Slight J, Velecela V, et al. Wt1 is required for cardiovascular progenitor cell formation through transcriptional control of Snail and E-cadherin. Nat Genet. 2010;42:89–93. doi: 10.1038/ng.494. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [25].Takeichi M, Nimura K, Mori M, Nakagami H, Kaneda Y. The transcription factors Tbx18 and Wt1 control the epicardial epithelial-mesenchymal transition through bi-directional regulation of Slug in murine primary epicardial cells. PLoS One. 2013;8:e57829. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057829. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [26].Acharya A, Baek ST, Huang G, Eskiocak B, Goetsch S, Sung CY, et al. The bHLH transcription factor Tcf21 is required for lineage-specific EMT of cardiac fibroblast progenitors. Development. 2012;139:2139–49. doi: 10.1242/dev.079970. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [27].Zhou B, Ma Q, Rajagopal S, Wu SM, Domian I, Rivera-Feliciano J, et al. Epicardial progenitors contribute to the cardiomyocyte lineage in the developing heart. Nature. 2008;454:109–13. doi: 10.1038/nature07060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [28].Cai CL, Martin JC, Sun Y, Cui L, Wang L, Ouyang K, et al. A myocardial lineage derives from Tbx18 epicardial cells. Nature. 2008;454:104–8. doi: 10.1038/nature06969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [29].Acharya A, Baek ST, Banfi S, Eskiocak B, Tallquist MD. Efficient inducible Cre-mediated recombination in Tcf21cell lineages in the heart and kidney. Genesis. 2011;49:870–7. doi: 10.1002/dvg.20750. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [30].Moore-Morris T, Guimaraes-Camboa N, Yutzey KE, Puceat M, Evans SM. Cardiac fibroblasts: from development to heart failure. J Mol Med. 2015;93:823–30. doi: 10.1007/s00109-015-1314-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [31].Ruiz-Villalba A, Simon AM, Pogontke C, Castillo MI, Abizanda G, Pelacho B, et al. Interacting resident epicardium-derived fibroblasts and recruited bone marrow cells form myocardial infarction scar. J Am Col Cardiol. 2015;65:2057–66. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.03.520. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [32].Duan J, Gherghe C, Liu D, Hamlett E, Srikantha L, Rodgers L, et al. Wnt1/betacatenin injury response activates the epicardium and cardiac fibroblasts to promote cardiac repair. The EMBO journal. 2012;31:429–42. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2011.418. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [33].Zeisberg EM, Tarnavski O, Zeisberg M, Dorfman AL, McMullen JR, Gustafsson E, et al. Endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition contributes to cardiac fibrosis. Nat Med. 2007;13:952–61. doi: 10.1038/nm1613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [34].Davis J, Molkentin JD. Myofibroblasts: Trust your heart and let fate decide. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2014;70:9–18. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2013.10.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [35].Lepilina A, Coon AN, Kikuchi K, Holdway JE, Roberts RW, Burns CG, et al. A dynamic epicardial injury response supports progenitor cell activity during zebrafish heart regeneration. Cell. 2006;127:607–19. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.08.052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [36].Asli NS, Xaymardan M, Harvey RP. Epicardial origin of resident mesenchymal stem cells in the adult mammalian heart. J Dev Biol. 2014;2:117–37. [Google Scholar]
- [37].Smits AM, Riley PR. Epicardium-derived heart repair. J Dev Biol. 2014;2:84–100. doi: 10.3390/jdb2020084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [38].Russell JL, Goetsch SC, Gaiano NR, Hill JA, Olson EN, Schneider JW. A dynamic notch injury response activates epicardium and contributes to fibrosis repair. Circ Res. 2011;108:51–9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.110.233262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [39].Hartupee J, Mann DJ. Role of inflammatory cells in fibroblast activation. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2016 doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2015.11.016. In press:doi:10.1016./j.yjmcc.2015.11.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [40].van Putten S, Shafieyan Y, Hinz B. Mechanical control of cardiac myofibroblasts. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2016 doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2015.11.025. in press:doi:10.1016/j.yjmcc.2015.11.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [41].Kuwahara F, Kai H, Tokuda K, Kai M, Takeshita A, Egashira K, et al. Transforming Growth Factor-β Function Blocking Prevents Myocardial Fibrosis and Diastolic Dysfunction in Pressure-Overloaded Rats. Circulation. 2002;106:130–5. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000020689.12472.e0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [42].Teekakirikul P, Eminaga S, Toka O, Alcalai R, Wang L, Wakimoto H, et al. Cardiac fibrosis in mice with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is mediated by non-myocyte proliferation and requires Tgf-β. The Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2010;120:3520–9. doi: 10.1172/JCI42028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [43].He W, Zhang L, Ni A, Zhang Z, Mirotsou M, Mao L, et al. Exogenously administered secreted frizzled related protein 2 (Sfrp2) reduces fibrosis and improves cardiac function in a rat model of myocardial infarction. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2010;107:21110–5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1004708107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [44].Koitabashi N, Danner T, Zaiman AL, Pinto YM, Rowell J, Mankowski J, et al. Pivotal role of cardiomyocyte TGF-β signaling in the murine pathological response to sustained pressure overload. The Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2011;121:2301–12. doi: 10.1172/JCI44824. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [45].Xiang F, Liu Y, Lu X, Jones DL, Feng Q. Cardiac-specific overexpression of human stem cell factor promotes epicardial activation and arteriogenesis after myocardial infarction. Circ Heart Fail. 2014;7:831–42. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.114.001423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [46].Laeremans H, Hackeng TM, van Zandvoort MAMJ, Thijssen VLJL, Janssen BJA, Ottenheijm HCJ, et al. Blocking of Frizzled Signaling With a Homologous Peptide Fragment of Wnt3a/Wnt5a Reduces Infarct Expansion and Prevents the Development of Heart Failure After Myocardial Infarction. Circulation. 2011;124:1626–35. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.976969. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [47].Smart N, Risebro CA, Melville AA, Moses K, Schwartz RJ, Chien KR, et al. Thymosin beta4 induces adult epicardial progenitor mobilization and neovascularization. Nature. 2007;445:177–82. doi: 10.1038/nature05383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [48].Smart N, Bollini S, Dube KN, Vieira JM, Zhou B, Davidson S, et al. De novo cardiomyocytes from within the activated adult heart after injury. Nature. 2011;474:640–4. doi: 10.1038/nature10188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [49].Bollini S, Vieira JM, Howard S, Dube KN, Balmer GM, Smart N, et al. Reactivated adult epicardial progenitor cells are a heterogeneous population molecularly distinct from their embryonic counterparts. Stem Cells Dev. 2014;23:1719–30. doi: 10.1089/scd.2014.0019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [50].Chong JJ, Chandrakanthan V, Xaymardan M, Asli NS, Li J, Ahmed I, et al. Adult cardiac-resident MSC-like stem cells with a proepicardial origin. Cell Stem Cell. 2011;9:527–40. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2011.10.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [51].Wei K, Serpooshan V, Hurtado C, Diez-Cunado M, Zhao M, Maruyama S, et al. Epicardial FSTL1 reconstitution regenerates the adult mammalian heart. Nature. 2015;525:479–85. doi: 10.1038/nature15372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

