Skip to main content
NCBI home page
3 Biotech logoLink to 3 Biotech
. 2016 Feb 23;6(1):81. doi: 10.1007/s13205-016-0368-z

Insight into thermophiles and their wide-spectrum applications

Ridhi Mehta 1, Paavan Singhal 1, Hardeep Singh 1, Dhanashree Damle 2, Anil K Sharma 1,✉
PMCID: PMC4764608  PMID: 28330151

Abstract

The deconstruction of biomass is a pivotal process for the manufacture of target products using microbial cells and their enzymes. But the enzymes that possess a significant role in the breakdown of biomass remain relatively unexplored. Thermophilic microorganisms are of special interest as a source of novel thermostable enzymes. Many thermophilic microorganisms possess properties suitable for biotechnological and commercial use. There is, indeed, a considerable demand for a new generation of stable enzymes that are able to withstand severe conditions in industrial processes by replacing or supplementing traditional chemical processes. This manuscript reviews the pertinent role of thermophilic microorganisms as a source for production of thermostable enzymes, factors afftecting them, recent patents on thermophiles and moreso their wide spectrum applications for commercial and biotechnological use.

Keywords: Thermophilic microorganisms, Thermostable enzymes, Heat tolerance and biomass

Introduction

Organisms with an optimum temperature for growth between 60 and 80 °C are generally designated as thermophiles, while those growing optimally above 80 °C are referred to as hyperthermophiles (Santos and Da Costa 2002). Thermophilic bacteria are microbes that mostly inhabit hot springs, live and survive in temperatures above 70 °C. As a consequence of growth at high temperatures and unique macromolecular properties, thermophiles can possess high metabolism, physically and chemically stable enzymes and lower growth but higher end product yields than similar mesophilic species (Haki and Rakshit 2003) (Tables 1, 2).

Table 1.

Thermophilic enzymes and their potential roles

Microorganisms Enzymes Temperature of activity Applications References
Pyrococcus woesei alpha-Amylases Topt. = 100 °C Sugar industry and starch processing Alqueres et al. (2007)
Thermococcus profundus DT5432 alpha-Amylases Topt. = 80 °C Sugar industry and starch processing Eichler (2001), Antranikian et al. (2005)
Staphylothermus marines Pullulanases Topt. = 90–105 °C Sugar industry and starch processing Eichler (2001), Antranikian et al. (2005)
Thermoplasma acidophilum Glucoamylases Topt. = 90 °C Sugar industry and starch processing Eichler (2001), Antranikian et al. (2005)
Pyrococcus woesei β-Galactosidases Topt. = 93 °C Production of milk with low lactose content Dabrowski et al. (1998)
Pyrococcus furiosus Sulfolobales sp. Cellulases Topt. = 103 °C Production of alcohol, fruit industry Antranikian et al. (2005)
Pyrodictium abyssi Xylanases Topt. = 100–110 °C Paper industry–bleaching of pulp Egorova and Antranikian (2005), Eichler (2001)
Humicola lanuginosa strain Y-38 Lipases Topt. = 65 °C Laundry detergents Arima et al. (1972)
Myceliophthora thermophila Laccases Topt. = 60 °C Polymerization of phenolic compounds to humic substances Chefetz et al. (1998)
Myceliophthora thermophila Phytases Topt. = 42–45 °C Animal feed Wyss et al. (1999)
Penicillium duponti glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase Topt. = 50 °C Generation of NADPH for biosynthetic reactions Broad and Shepherd (1970)
Bacillus lichniformis Alcalase Topt. = 60 °C Component of protein-fortified soft drinks and dietetic food, helps in protein recovery from meat, fish and crustacean shell waste Synowiecki (2008)
Open in a new tab

Table 2.

Recent patents on thermophiles and their potential applications

S. no Topic Patent number and date Application References
1 Single step bioconversion of lignocellulosic biomass to biofuels using extreme thermophilic bacteria US2014/0363869 A1 December 11, 2014 Bioconversion of lignocellulosic biomass to biofuels Curvers et al. (2014)
2 Thermophilic bacterium and uses of extracellular proteins therefrom US 8828238 B2 September 9, 2014 Excellent metal ion binding ability Han et al. (2014)
3 Fermentation of moderately thermophilic Bacilli on sucrose US 8,663,954 B2 March 4, 2014 Genetic modification of moderately thermophilic Bacillus strain to utilise sucrose as a carbon source Van Kranenburg et al. (2014)
4 Bioremediation of persistent organic pollutants using thermophilic bacteria US 2014/0042087 A1 February 13, 2014 Degradation of organic pollutants O’Driscoll et al. (2014)
5 Phytase-producing bacteria, phytase and production method of phytase US 6,180,390 B1 January 30, 2001 Role in animal feeding, environmental protection, human nutrition and health and industrial applications. Chu et al. (2001)
6 Process for producing modified microorganisms for oil treatment at high temperatures, pressures and salinity US 5492828A February 20, 1996 Used in microbial enhanced oil recovery Eugene et al. (1996)
Open in a new tab

Natural environments for anaerobic thermophiles range from terrestrial volcanic sites (including solfatara fields) with temperatures slightly above ambient temperature, to submarine hydrothermal systems (sediments, submarine volcanoes, fumaroles and vents) with temperatures exceeding 300 °C, subterranean sites such as oil reservoirs, and solar heated surface soils with temperatures up to 65 °C. There are also human-made hot environments such as compost piles (usually around 60–70 °C but as high as 100 °C) slag heaps, industrial processes and water heaters (Oshima and Moriya 2008).

The ubiquitous nature of the thermophiles is attested to by the great variety of sources from which they have been isolated from freshly fallen snow (Golikowa 1926) to the sands of the Sahara Desert (Negre 1913). They have been found to occur in the air (Sames 1900), the soil of temperate (Blau 1906; Gilbert 1904; Sames 1900) and tropical (De Kruyff, 1910) regions, salt (MacFadyen and Blaxall 1896) and fresh water, both cold (Tirelli 1907; Catterina 1904) and thermal (Georgevitch 1910a, b; Falcioni 1907; Benignetm 1905; Setchell 1903).

Factors affecting heat tolerance of thermophilic organisms are as follows:

  1. Permeability: cell membranes effectively function as a permeability barrier, controlling the in-flow and out-flow of low-molecular weight compounds. The permeability of fatty acyl ester lipid membranes is highly temperature dependent and their phase-transition temperature is dependent on the fatty acid composition, so when the growth temperature shifts, the fatty acid composition of membrane lipids is quickly regulated (Koga 2012).

  2. Chemical stability: thermophilic organisms are able to grow at high temperature due to the chemical stability of their membrane lipids (Koga 2012).

  3. Temperature: lipids that increase in proportion to an increase in growth temperature may be designated as “thermophilic lipids.” In the extremely thermophilic environment, methanoarchaea Methanocaldococcus jannaschii have been reported. When the growth temperature increases from 45 to 65 °C, the diether lipids (archaeolbased lipids) decrease from 80 to 20 %, while the standard caldarchaeol-based and cyclic archaeol-based lipids increase from 10 to 40 %, respectively (Sprott et al. 1991).

  4. G+C content: rRNA and tRNA molecules of thermophilic bacteria have higher G+C contents than mesophiles (Galtier and Lobry 1997). Because the GC base pair forms more hydrogen bonds than the AT base pair, higher G+C contents in the double-stranded stem region improves thermostability of the RNA molecules (Lao and Forsdyke 2000; Paz et al. 2004).

  5. Proteins: the surface regions of thermophilic proteins have fewer (non-charged) polar amino acids and more charged amino acids, and these charged residues result in an increased number of intramolecular salt bridges (Thompson and Eisenberg 1999).

The ability of microorganisms to survive under harsh conditions has prompted researchers to study these organisms to better understand their characteristics and eventually utilize them in various applications. Further insight into thermophilic microorganisms has been highlighted through this review article as thermophiles possess enumerable properties suitable for biotechnological and commercial applications.

Biotechnological applications of thermophiles

Thermophiles have shown tremendous promise in terms of their applications in modern biotechnology. Some of the high end applications of these thermophiles have been elucidated below (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Open in a new tab

Various applications of thermophilic microorganisms

Bioconversion of lignocellulose to hydrogen

Although many reported microorganisms possess the capability of cellulose hydrolysis or hydrogen production (H2), no conclusive research has been able to clarify that both of these capabilities are possessed in a single microorganism. Hot springs are a potential source for thermophilic hydrogen (H2) and ethanol producing micro-organisms. Compared with mesophiles, thermophiles are thought to be more robust for cellulose degradation and hydrogen production. In particular, the rate of cellulolysis is presumably more rapid at elevated temperatures (Wiegel and Ljungdahl 1986; Blumer-Schuette et al. 2008). As a result, thermophilic microorganisms isolated from various environments are an attractive prospect for cellulolytic biohydrogen production (CBP) from complex lignocellulosic biomass. The co-cultures of thermophilic cellulolytic bacterium Clostridium thermocellum with non-cellulolytic thermophilic anaerobic bacteria and the extremely thermophilic cellulolytic bacterium Caldicellulosiruptor saccharolyticus have been used for CBP-based hydrogen production (Liu et al. 2008; Ivanova et al. 2009). Several species of genus Thermoanaerobacterium including T. thermosaccharolyticum, T. polysaccharolyticum, T. zeae, T. lactoethylicum, T. aotearoense, and T. saccharolyticum possess the capability to utilize various macromolecules accompanied by H2 production (Ganghofer et al. 1998; Hoster et al. 2001; O-Thong et al. 2008; Ren et al. 2008; Cann et al. 2001; Ueno et al. 2001).

Several anaerobic thermophiles have been shown to utilize cellulose, including Clostridium thermocellum, Clostridium straminisolvens, Clostridium stercorarium, Caldicellulosiruptor saccharolyticus, and Caldicellulosiruptor obsidiansis (Freier et al. 1988; Hamilton-Brehm et al. 2010; Kato et al. 2004; Madden 1983; Rainey et al. 1994; Wiegel and Dykstra 1984).

Hydrogen may be the fuel of the future once hydrogen fuel cells for propelling cars are perfected (McAlister 1998). When oxygen and hydrogen are combined in a fuel cell, they provide electricity and a little heat, giving water as the only waste product. The hydrogen car will be clean because it will not discharge nitrogen oxides and carbon dioxide. Hydrogen can be obtained cheaply using special enzymes (extremozymes) by the transformation of cellulose into glucose sugar, then converting the glucose product and its byproduct, gluconic acid into hydrogen (Woodward et al. 2000).

The extremely thermophilic bacterium C. owensensis has comprehensive hemicellulase and cellulase system. The enzymes of C. owensensis had high ability for degrading the hemicellulose of native lignocellulosic biomass. High temperature pre-hydrolysis on native lignocellulosic biomass by the extra-enzyme of C. owensensis could greatly improve the glucan conversion rate, making almost the same contribution as steam-exploded pretreatment (Peng et al. 2015).

Conversion of glycerol to lactate

Bioprospecting efforts for exploring novel biocatalytic molecules with unique properties have inspired the design and construction of a wider variety of artificial metabolic pathways (Bond-Watts et al. 2011). Employment of enzymes derived from thermophiles and hyperthermophiles enables the simple preparation of catalytic modules with excellent selectivity and thermal stability (Ye et al. 2012; Ninh et al. 2015). These excellent stabilities of thermophilic enzymes allow greater flexibility in the operational conditions of in vitro bioconversion systems. Generally, 10 kg of crude glycerol, which is the primary byproduct of the biodiesel industry, is released for every 100 kg of biodiesel and the growing production of biodiesel has resulted in a worldwide surplus of crude glycerol (Nguyen et al. 2013). An artificial in vitro metabolic pathway for the conversion of glycerol to lactate has been constructed. The in vitro pathway consisted of nine thermophilic and hyperthermophilic enzymes and designed to balance the intrapathway consumption and regeneration of cofactors (Okano et al. 2010).

Conversion of d-xylose into ethanol

Thermophilic anaerobic bacteria could be promising candidates for conversion of hemicellulose or its monomers (xylose, arabinose, mannose and galactose) into ethanol with a satisfactory yield and productivity. A number of thermophilic enrichment cultures, and new isolates of thermophilic anaerobic bacterial strains growing optimally at 70–80 °C for their ethanol production from d-xylose have been isolated from hot springs, paper pulp mills and brewery waste water. The species investigated so far are Thermoanaerobacter ethanolicus (Wiegel and Ljungdahl 1981; Kannan and Mutharasan 1985), Clostridium thermocellum (Viljoen et al. 1926; McBee 1954; Ng et al. 1981), Clostridium thermohydrosulfuricum (Cook and Morgan 1994; Wiegel et al. 1979; Do¨nmez and O¨zcelik 1992) (reclassified as Thermoanaerobacter thermohydrosulfuricus) (Lee et al. 1993), Thermoanaerobium brockii (Zeikus et al. 1979; Ben-Bassat et al. 1981) (reclassified as Thermoanaerobacter brockii) (Lee et al. 1993), Clostridium thermosaccharolyticum (McClung 1935; Mistry and Cooney 1989) (reclassified as Thermoanaerobacterium thermosaccharolyticum) (Collins et al. 1994) and Thermoanaerobacterium saccharolyticum B6A (Lee et al. 1993; Weimer 1985). To obtain a viable bio-ethanol production, all the carbohydrate constituents of lignocellulosic biomass need to be converted into ethanol (Wright 1988; Lynd 1990; Von Sivers and Zacchi 1995). Xylan is mainly composed of D-xylose and it has been reported that most of the isolates produced ethanol as the main end fermentation product from both xylose and xylan (Sommer et al. 2004). Among the advantages, thermophiles have broad substrate spectra and can degrade both hexoses and pentoses simultaneously; some thermophiles natively degrade complex carbohydrates; they operate at temperatures that minimize contamination risk of mesophiles. Additionally, recent advances have improved ethanol yields by using genetic engineering, often by knocking out metabolic pathways to other end products.This has minimized the perceived advantage of mesophiles over thermophiles considerably, although no large scale bioethanol plants with genetically modified microbes are currently operating (Scully and Orlygsson 2015).

Biodegradation of petroleum hydrocarbons

Thermophiles have also been utilized for the microbial degradation of crude oil and refined petroleum pollutants. Foght and McFarlane (1999) studied the growth of extremophiles on petroleum hydrocarbon. Some potential applications are related to molecular genetics of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon degradation by bacteria. Also the factors that control degradation and methods to enhance the ability of bacteria to degrade such pollutants in the environment have been studied. April et al. (2000) studied the process of crude oil degradation by mixed populations, pure cultures, and genetic mutants. They demonstrated the loss of parent compounds and analyzed the products of bacterial attack on crude oils using gas chromatography, mass spectrometry. The use of thermophiles for biodegradation of hydrocarbons with low water solubility is of interest, as solubility and bioavailability, are enhanced at elevated temperatures. Thermophiles, predominantly bacilli, possess a significant potential for the degradation of environmental pollutants, including all major classes. Indigenous thermophilic hydrocarbon degraders are of special significance for the bioremediation of oil-polluted desert soil (Margesin and Schinner 2001).

Recovery of heavy metals

As a result of increasing industrial activities, heavy metal contamination is a problem. Microorganisms can interact with heavy metals in a variety of ways that result in decreased metal mobility and solubility. The metal and sulfate-reducing bacteria have suitable physiology for metal precipitation and immobilization. The activities of these microbes provide metabolic products such as iron and hydrogen sulphide, which lead to mineral formation. These minerals can react with heavy metals, resulting in precipitation and hence detoxification (Chalaal and Islam 2001). In order to understand the removal of such types of toxins, Chalaal and Islam (2001) used two strains of thermophilic bacteria belonging to the Bacillus family, isolated from hot water stream, to remove strontium from aqueous stream systems. These bacteria were able to concentrate strontium in one side of a two-compartment bioreactor. Immobilization of heavy metals using sulphide-producing microorganisms has been reported as an effective means of treating some metal-contaminated sites (Crawford and Crawford 1996).

Remediation of textile dyes

Laccase enzyme purified from thermophile, Geobacillus thermocatenulatus MS5 is of very higher catalytic activity and are economic, highly stable at different temperatures and pH levels and can be used widely and effectively in the removal of the dyes that cause environmental pollution. Verma and Shirkot investigated the purified laccase enzyme for the removal of some dyes used in industry i.e., Remazole Brilliant Blue R (RBBR), Indigo carmine, Congo red, Brilliant green and Bromophenol blue. In case of Indigo carmine and congo red dye, 99 % of decolorization occured after 48 h of incubation, followed by RBBR dye, Bromophenol Blue and Brilliant Green i.e., 98, 70 and 60 % respectively (Verma and Shirkot 2014).

Thermophilic lignolytic fungal cultures were isolated from soil/digested slurry/plant debris and were subjected for acclimatization to Remazol Brilliant Blue (RBB) at 0.05 % concentration, in the malt extract broth (MEB). The results suggested the isolates as a useful tool for degradation of reactive dyes (Sahni and Gupta 2014).

Saccharification of agricultural residues

Sporotricum thermophile LAR5 is an excellent fungal isolate having an ability to utilize crude agriculture based materials as carbon and nitrogen sources to produce significant cellulase titre. Cellulase possesses desirable properties from industrial application point of view such as activity and stability over broad pH range and high temperatures and good saccharification ability on acid-pretreated rice straw. It has been reported that considerable sugars are produced by enzymatic hydrolysis of acid-pretreated solids (3.5, 5.7, 7.9, 7.7 micromoles/ml from 1, 3, 5 and 7 % acid-pretreated solids, respectively) using the S. thermophile LAR5 cellulase (Bajaj et al. 2014). Recombinant S. thermophile cellulase shows potential to hydrolyze variety of cellulosic substrates with a peculiarity that presence of lignin in various substrates enhances the degree of saccharification (Dimarogona et al. 2012).

Thermophilic bacilli in dairy processing

Thermophilic bacilli are used as hygiene indicators of processed product, within the dairy processing context. This is because of the ability of these strains to form endospores and biofilms. The thermophilic bacilli, such as Anoxybacillus flavithermus and Geobacillus spp., are an important group of contaminants in the dairy industry. Although these bacilli are generally not pathogenic, their presence in dairy products is an indicator of poor hygiene and high numbers are unacceptable to customers. In addition, their growth may result in milk product defects caused by the production of acids or enzymes, potentially leading to off-flavors (Burgess et al. 2010). Many strains of genera Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium, as well as some enterococci and yeasts, have been shown to possess probiotic properties with potential for prophylaxis and treatment of a range of gastrointestinal disorders (Varankovich et al. 2015).

Keratin degradation

A novel thermophilic bacterium, Fervidobacterium pennavorans, belonging to the Thermotogales order, isolated from hot springs of Azores island, grows optimally at 70 °C and pH 6.5. It is the first known thermophile that is able to degrade native feathers at high temperatures. With the help of these enzymes, feathers could be converted to defined products such as the rare amino acids, serine, cysteine and proline (Friedrich and Antranikian 1996).

Cancer treatment

Asperjinone, a nor-neolignan, and Terrein, a suppressor of ABCG2-expressing breast cancer cells were isolated from thermophile Aspergillus terreus, which can restore drug sensitivity and could be the key to improve breast cancer therapeutics. Terrein, displayed strong cytotoxicity against breast cancer MCF-7 cells. Treatment with terrein significantly suppressed growth of ABCG2-expressing breast cancer cells. This suppressive effect was achieved by inducing apoptosis via activating the caspase-7 pathway and inhibiting the Akt signaling pathway, which led to a decrease in ABCG2-expressing cells and a reduction in the side-population phenotype (Liao et al. 2012). Conventional chemotherapeutic agents are usually non specific towards cancerous cells and inhibit the progression of any dividing cells. The therapeutic potential of antitumor drugs is seriously limited by the manifestation of serious side effects and drug resistance. So there is a need of agents that are more effective, more selective and may not cause drug resistance. According to Patent no. WO 2006/053445 A1, an invention is disclosed, whereby a composition of bacteriocin derived from lactic acid bacteria and a carrier can be used for inhibiting proliferation of cancerous cells (Mehta et al. 2013).

Conclusions

The increasing number of patents indicates that there is a growing interest in the commercial applications of thermophiles. The demand for thermostable enzymes has increased tremendously in the past few years. Since only a very few species from this group of microorganisms have been isolated till date, there seems to be a large number of hyperthermophilic catalysts with unique properties awaiting discovery.

Acknowledgments

Authors would like to acknowledge M.M. University Mullana (Ambala) for providing all the requisite facilities pertaining to the said work.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

There exists no conflict of interest regarding publication of this manuscript.

References

  1. Alqueres SMC, Almeida RV, Clementino MM, Vieira RP, Almeida WI, Cardoso AM, Martins OB. Exploring the biotechnological applications in the archeal domain. Brazil J Microbiol. 2007;38:398–405. doi: 10.1590/S1517-83822007000300002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Antranikian G, Vorgias CE, Bertoldo C. Extreme environments as a resource for microorganisms and novel biocatalysts. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol. 2005;96:219–262. doi: 10.1007/b135786. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. April TM, Foght JM, Currah RS. Hydrocarbon-degrading fungi isolated from flare pit soils in northern and western Canada. Can J Microbiol. 2000;46:38–49. doi: 10.1139/cjm-46-1-38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Arima K, Liu WH, Beppu T. Studies on the lipase of thermophilic fungus Humicola lanuginosa. Agric Biol Chem. 1972;36:893–895. doi: 10.1080/00021369.1972.10860340. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bajaj BK, Sharma M, Rao RS. Agricultural residues for production of cellulase from Sporotrichum thermophile LAR5 and its application for saccharification of rice straw. J Mater Environ Sci. 2014;5(5):1454–1460. [Google Scholar]
  6. Ben-Bassat A, Lamed R, Zeikus JG. Ethanol production by thermophilic bacteria: metabolic control of end product formation in Thermoanaerobium brockii. J Bacteriol. 1981;146:192–199. doi: 10.1128/jb.146.1.192-199.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Benignetm D. Di un germe termofflo isolato dai fanghi d’Acqui. Riv d’igiene santa pubbl. 1905;16:449–455. [Google Scholar]
  8. Blau O (1906) Ueber die Temperaturmaxidma der Sporenkeimung und der Sporenbildung,sowie die supramaximalen Totungszeiten der Sporen der Bakterien, auch derjenigen mit hohen Temperaturmaxima Zentr Bakt Parasitenk Infek II 15:97–143
  9. Blumer-Schuette SE, Kataeva I, Westpheling J, Adams MWW, Kelly RM. Extremely thermophilic microorganisms for biomass conversion: status and prospects. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2008;19:210–217. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2008.04.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Bond-Watts BB, Bellerose RJ, Chang MCY. Enzyme mechanism as a kinetic control element for designing synthetic biofuel pathways. Nat Chem Biol. 2011;7:222–227. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Broad TE, Shepherd MG. Purification and properties of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase from the thermophilic fungus Penicillium duponti. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1970;198:407–414. doi: 10.1016/0005-2744(70)90119-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Burgess SA, Lindsay D, Flint SH. Thermophilic bacilli and their importance in dairy processing. Int J Food Microbiol. 2010;144:215–225. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2010.09.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Cann IKO, Stroot PG, Mackie KR, White BA, Mackie RI. Characterization of two novel saccharolytic, anaerobic thermophiles, Thermoanaerobacterium polysaccharolyticum sp. nov and Thermoanaerobacterium zeae sp. nov, and emendation of the genus Thermoanaerobacterium. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2001;51:293–302. doi: 10.1099/00207713-51-2-293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Catterina G. Beitrag zum Studium der thermophilen Bakterien. Zentr Bakt Parasitenk Infek Il. 1904;12:353–355. [Google Scholar]
  15. Chalaal O, Islam MR. Integrated management of radioactive strontium contamination in aqueous stream systems. J Environ Manage. 2001;61:51–59. doi: 10.1006/jema.2000.0399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Chefetz B, Chen Y, Hadar Y. Purification and characterization of laccase from Chaetomium thermophilium and its role in humification. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1998;64:3175–3179. doi: 10.1128/aem.64.9.3175-3179.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Chu JS, Chung SF, Tseng M, Wen CY, Chu WS (2001) Phytase-producing bacteria, phytase and production method of phytase. US 6,180,390 B1
  18. Collins MD, Lawson PA, Willems A, Cordoba JJ, Fernandez-Garayzabal J, Garcia P, Cai J, Hippe H, Farrow AE. The phylogeny of the genus Clostridium: proposal of five new genera and eleven new species combinations. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1994;44:812–826. doi: 10.1099/00207713-44-4-812. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Cook GM, Morgan HW. Hyperbolic growth of Thermoanaerobacter thermohydrosulfuricus (Clostridium thermohydrosulfuricus) increases ethanol production in pH controlled batch culture. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 1994;41:84–89. doi: 10.1007/BF00166086. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  20. Crawford RL, Crawford DL (1996) Bioremediation: principles and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  21. Curvers S, Koln DE, Svetlichnyi V (2014) Single step bioconversion of lignocellulosic biomass to biofuels using extreme thermophilic bacteria. US Patent 0363869 A1
  22. Dabrowski S, Maciuńska J, Synowiecki J. Cloning and nucleotide sequence of the thermostable beta-galactosidase gene from Pyrococcus woesei in Escherichia coli and some properties of the isolated enzyme. Mol Biotechnol. 1998;10(3):217–222. doi: 10.1007/BF02740841. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. De kruyff E (1910) Les bact6ries thermophiles dans le tropiques Zentr Bakt Parasitenk Infek II 26:65–74
  24. Dimarogona M, Topakas E, Olsson L, Christakopoulos P. Lignin boosts the cellulase performance of a GH-61 enzyme from Sporotrichum thermophile. Bioresour Technol. 2012;110:480–487. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.01.116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Do¨ nmez S, O¨ zcelik F. Ethanol fermentation of beet molasses by Clostridium thermohydrosulfuricam. Enzyme Microb Tech. 1992;14:413–416. doi: 10.1016/0141-0229(92)90012-D. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  26. Egorova K, Antranikian G. Industrial revelance of thermophilic. Archaea Curr Opin Microbiol. 2005;8:649–655. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2005.10.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Eichler J. Biotechnological uses of archaeal extremozymes. Biotech Adv. 2001;19:261–278. doi: 10.1016/S0734-9750(01)00061-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Eugene T, Premuzic EM, Lin M, Point R (1996) Process for producing modified microorganisms for oil treatment at high temperatures, pressures and salinity. US 005,492,828A
  29. Falcioni D. I germi termofili nelle acque del Bullicame. Arch Farmacol Speri. 1907;6:1–5. [Google Scholar]
  30. Foght JM, McFarlane DM. Growth of extremophiles on petroleum. In: Seckbach J, editor. Enigmatic microorganisms and life in extreme environments. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1999. pp. 527–538. [Google Scholar]
  31. Freier D, Mothershed CP, Wiegel J. Characterization of Clostridium thermocellum JW20. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1988;54:204–211. doi: 10.1128/aem.54.1.204-211.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Friedrich AB, Antranikian G. Keratin degradation by Fervidobacterium pennavorans, a novel thermophilic anaerobic species of the order Thermotogales. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1996;62(8):2875–2882. doi: 10.1128/aem.62.8.2875-2882.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Galtier N, Lobry JR. Relationships between genomic G+C content, RNA secondary structures, and optimal growth temperature in prokaryotes. J Mol Evol. 1997;44(6):632–636. doi: 10.1007/PL00006186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Ganghofer D, Kellermann J, Staudenbauer WL, Bronnenmeier K. Purification and properties of an amylopullulanase, a glucoamylase, and an alphaglucosidase in the amylolytic enzyme system of Thermoanaerobacterium thermosaccharolyticum. Biosci Biotech Bioch. 1998;62:302–308. doi: 10.1271/bbb.62.302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Georgevitch P. Bacillus thermophilus Jivoini nov spec and Bacillus thermophilus Losanitchi nov spec. Zentr Bakt Parasitenk Infek II. 1910;27:150–167. [Google Scholar]
  36. Georgevitch P. Bacillus thermophilusvranjensis. Arch Hyg Sci. 1910;72:201–210. [Google Scholar]
  37. Gilbert Ueber Actinomyces thermophilue und andere Aktinomyceten. Z Hyg Infektionskrankh. 1904;47:383–405. doi: 10.1007/BF02284567. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  38. Golikowa SM (1926) Zur Frage der Thermobiose Zentr Bakt Parasitenk Infek II. 69:178–185
  39. Haki GD, Rakshit SK. Developments in industrially important thermostable enzymes. Bioresour Technol. 2003;89:17–34. doi: 10.1016/S0960-8524(03)00033-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Hamilton-Brehm SD, Mosher JJ, Vishnivetskaya T, Podar M, Carroll S, Allman S, Phelps TJ, Keller M. Caldicellulosiruptor obsidiansis sp nov, an anaerobic, extremely thermophilic, cellulolytic bacterium isolated from Obsidian Pool, Yellowstone National Park. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010;76:1014–1020. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01903-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Han YL, Tainam TW, Guo TR, Zhubei TW, Chang JS, Taichung TW, Chou IJ (2014) Thermophilic bacterium and uses of extracellular proteins therefrom. US 8828238 B2
  42. Hoster F, Daniel R, Gottschalk G. Isolation of a new Thermoanaerobacterium thermosaccharolyticum strain (FH1) producing a thermostable dextranase. J Gen Appl Microbiol. 2001;47:187–192. doi: 10.2323/jgam.47.187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Ivanova G, Rákhely G, Kovács KL. Thermophilic biohydrogen production from energy plants by Caldicellulosiruptor saccharolyticus and comparison with related studies. Int J Hydrogen Energ. 2009;34:3659–3670. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.02.082. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  44. Kannan V, Mutharasan R. Ethanol fermentation characteristics of Thermoanaerobacter ethanolicus. Enzyme Microb Technol. 1985;7:87–89. doi: 10.1016/0141-0229(85)90019-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  45. Kato S, Haruta S, Cui ZJ, Ishii M, Yokota A, Igarashi Y. Clostridium straminisolvens sp nov, a moderately thermophilic, aerotolerant and cellulolytic bacterium isolated from a cellulose-degrading bacterial community. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2004;54:2043–2047. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.63148-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Koga Y. Thermal adaptation of the archaeal and bacterial lipid membranes. Archaea. 2012;2012:6. doi: 10.1155/2012/789652. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Kranenburg RV, Wageningen NL, Hartskamp MV, Gorinchem NL (2014) Fermentation of moderately thermophilic bacilli on sucrose. US 8,663,954 B2
  48. Lao PJ, Forsdyke DR. Thermophilic bacteria strictly obey Szybalski’s transcription direction rule and politely purine-load RNAs with both adenine and guanine. Genome Res. 2000;10(2):228–236. doi: 10.1101/gr.10.2.228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Lee Y, Jain MK, Lee C, Lowe SE, Zeikus JG. Taxonomic distinction of saccharolytic thermophilic anaerobes: description of Thermoanaerobacterium xylanolyticum gen nov, sp nov, and Thermoanaerobacterium saccharolyticum gen nov, sp nov; reclassification of Thermoanaerobium brockii, Clostridium thermosulfurigenes and Clostridium thermohydrosulfuricum E100-69 as Thermoanaerobacter brockii comb nov, Thermoanaerobacterium thermosulfurigenes comb nov, and Thermoanaerobacter thermohydrosulfuricus comb nov, respectively; and transfer of Clostridium thermohydrosulfuricum 39E to Thermoanaerobacter ethanolicus. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1993;43:41–51. doi: 10.1099/00207713-43-1-41. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  50. Liao WY, Shen CN, Lin LH, Yang YL, Han HY, Chen JW, Kuo SC, Wu SH, Liaw CC. Asperjinone, a nor-neolignan, and terrein, a suppressor of ABCG2-expressing breast cancer cells, from thermophilic Aspergillus terreus. J Nat Prod. 2012;75(4):630–635. doi: 10.1021/np200866z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Liu Y, Yu P, Song X, Qu YB. Hydrogen production from cellulose by coculture of Clostridium thermocellum JN4 and Thermoanaerobacterium thermosaccharolyticum GD17. Int J Hydrogen Energ. 2008;33:2927–2933. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.04.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  52. Lynd LR. Large scale fuel ethanol from lignocellulose: potential, economics, and research priorities. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 1990;24(25):695–720. doi: 10.1007/BF02920289. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  53. MacFadyen A and Blaxall FR (1896) Thermophilic bacteria. J Path Bact 3:87–99; Brit Med J 2, 644
  54. Madden RH. Isolation and characterization of Clostridium stercorarium sp nov, cellulolytic thermophile. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1983;33:837–840. doi: 10.1099/00207713-33-4-837. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  55. Margesin R, Schinner F. Biodegradation and bioremediation of hydrocarbons in extreme environments. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2001;56:650–663. doi: 10.1007/s002530100701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. McAlister R. Manufacturing sustainable prosperity in hydrogen today. Am Hydrogen Assoc. 1998;8(1):1–34. [Google Scholar]
  57. McBee RH. The characteristics of Clostridium thermocellum. J Bacteriol. 1954;67:505–506. doi: 10.1128/jb.67.4.505-506.1954. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. McClung LS. Studies on anaerobic bacteria: IV taxonomy of cultures of a thermophilic species causing “swells” of canned foods. J Bacteriol. 1935;29:189–202. doi: 10.1128/jb.29.2.189-203.1935. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Mehta R, Arya R, Goyal K, Singh M, Sharma AK. Bio-preservative and therapeutic potential of pediocin: recent trends and future perspectives. Recent Pat Biotechnol. 2013;7:172–178. doi: 10.2174/18722083113076660008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Mistry FR, Cooney CL. Production of ethanol by Clostridium thermosaccharolyticum: I effect of cell recycle and environmental parameters. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1989;34:1295–1304. doi: 10.1002/bit.260341008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Negre L. Bacteries thermophiles des sables du Sahara. C R Biol. 1913;74:814–816. [Google Scholar]
  62. Ng TK, Ben-Bassat A, Zeikus JG. Ethanol production by thermophilic bacteria: fermentation of cellulosic substrates by cocultures of Clostridium thermocellum and Clostridium thermohydrosulfuricum. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1981;41:1337–1343. doi: 10.1128/aem.41.6.1337-1343.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Nguyen AQ, Kim YG, Kim SB, Kim CJ. Improved tolerance of recombinant Escherichia coli to the toxicity of crude glycerol by overexpressing trehalose biosynthetic genes (otsBA) for the production of β-carotene. Biores Technol. 2013;143:531–537. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.06.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Ninh PH, Honda K, Sakai T, Okano K, Ohtake H. Assembly and multiple gene expression of thermophilic enzymes in Escherichia coli for in vitro metabolic engineering. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2015;112:189–196. doi: 10.1002/bit.25338. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. O’Driscoll K, Princeton NJ, Sambrotto R, Blauvelt NY, DiFilippo R, West Chester PA, Piccillo P, Chapel Hill NC (2014) Bioremediation of persistent organic pollutants using thermophilic bacteria. US 2014/0042087 A1
  66. Okano K, Tanaka T, Ogino C, Fukuda H, Kondo A. Biotechnological production of enantiomeric pure lactic acid from renewable resources: recent achievements, perspectives, and limits. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2010;85:413–423. doi: 10.1007/s00253-009-2280-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Oshima T, Moriya T. A preliminary analysis of microbial and biochemical properties of high-temperature compost. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008;1125:338–344. doi: 10.1196/annals.1419.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. O-Thong S, Prasertsan P, Karakashev D, Angelidaki I. Thermophilic fermentative hydrogen production by the newly isolated Thermoanaerobacterium thermosaccharolyticum PSU-2. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2008;33:1204–1214. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2007.12.015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  69. Paz A, Mester D, Baca I, Nevo E, Korol A. Adaptive role of increased frequency of polypurine tracts in mRNA sequences of thermophilic prokaryotes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101(9):2951–2956. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0308594100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Peng X, QiaoW Mi S, Jia X, Su H, Han Y. Characterization of hemicellulase and cellulase from the extremely thermophilic bacterium Caldicellulosiruptor owensensis and their potential application for bioconversion of lignocellulosic biomass without pretreatment. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2015;8(131):1–14. doi: 10.1186/s13068-015-0313-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Rainey FA, Donnison AM, Jansen PH, Saul D, Rodrigo A. Description of Caldicellulosiruptor saccharolyticus gen nov, sp nov: an obligately anaerobic, extremely thermophilic, cellulolytic bacterium. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1994;120:263–266. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1994.tb07043.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Ren NQ, Cao GL, Wang AJ, Lee DJ, Guo WQ, Zhu YH. Dark fermentation of xylose and glucose mix using isolated Thermoanaerobacterium thermosaccharolyticum W16. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2008;33:6124–6132. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.07.107. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  73. Sahni N, Gupta U. Bio-degradation of synthetic textile dyes by thermophilic lignolytic fungal isolates. J Adv Lab Res Biol. 2014;5(4):137–139. [Google Scholar]
  74. Sames T. Zur Kenntniss der bei hoherer Temperatur wachsenden Bakterienund Streptothrixarten. Z Hyg Infektionskrankh. 1900;33:313–362. doi: 10.1007/BF02283178. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  75. Santos H, Da Costa MS. Compatible solutes of organisms that live in hot saline environments. Environ Microbiol. 2002;4:501–509. doi: 10.1046/j.1462-2920.2002.00335.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Scully SM, Orlygsson J. Recent advances in second generation ethanol production by thermophilic bacteria. Energies. 2015;8(1):1–30. doi: 10.3390/en8010001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  77. Setchell WA. The upper temperature limits of life. Science. 1903;17:934–937. doi: 10.1126/science.17.441.934. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Sommer P, Georgieva T, Ahring BK. Potential for using thermophilic anaerobic bacteria for bioethanol production from hemicelluloses. Biochem Soc Trans. 2004;32(2):283–289. doi: 10.1042/bst0320283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Sprott GD, Meloche M, Richards JC. Proportions of diether, macrocyclic diether, and tetraether lipids in Methanococcus jannaschii grown at different temperatures. J Bacteriol. 1991;173(12):3907–3910. doi: 10.1128/jb.173.12.3907-3910.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Synowiecki J. Thermostable enzymes in food processing, in recent research developments in food biotechnology enzymes as additives or processing aids. Kerala: Research Signpost; 2008. [Google Scholar]
  81. Thompson MJ, Eisenberg D. Transproteomic evidence of a loop-deletion mechanism for enhancing protein thermostability. J Mol Biol. 1999;290(2):595–604. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1999.2889. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Tirelli E (1907) I termofili delle acque potabili Zentr Bakt Parasitenk Infek II 19:328
  83. Ueno Y, Haruta S, Igarashi Y. Microbial community in anaerobic hydrogen producing microflora enriched from sludge compost. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2001;57:555–562. doi: 10.1007/s002530100806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Varankovich NV, Nickerson MT, Korber DR. Probiotic-based strategies for therapeutic and prophylactic use against multiple gastrointestinal diseases. Front Biotechnol. 2015;6:1–14. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00685. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Verma A, Shirkot P. Purification and characterization of thermostable laccase from thermophilic Geobacillus thermocatenulatus MS5 and its applications in removal of textile dyes. Scholars Acad J Biosci. 2014;2(8):479–485. [Google Scholar]
  86. Viljoen JA, Fred EB, Peterson WH. The fermentation of cellulose by thermophilic bacteria. J Agric Sci. 1926;16:1–17. doi: 10.1017/S0021859600088249. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  87. Von Sivers M, Zacchi G. A techno-economical comparison of three processes for the production of ethanol from wood. Biores Technol. 1995;51:43–52. doi: 10.1016/0960-8524(94)00094-H. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  88. Weimer PJ. Thermophilic anaerobic fermentation of hemicellulose and hemicellulose-derived aldose sugars by Thermoanaerobacter strain B6A. Archives Microbiol. 1985;143:130–136. doi: 10.1007/BF00411035. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  89. Wiegel J, Dykstra M. Clostridium thermocellum: adhesion and sporulation while adhered to cellulose and hemicellulose. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 1984;20:59–65. doi: 10.1007/BF00254647. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  90. Wiegel J, Ljungdahl LG. Thermoanaerobacter ethanolicus gen nov, spec nov, a new, extreme thermophilic, anaerobic bacterium. Arch Microbiol. 1981;128:343–348. doi: 10.1007/BF00405910. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  91. Wiegel J, Ljungdahl LG. The importance of thermophilic bacteria in biotechnology. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 1986;3:39–108. doi: 10.3109/07388558509150780. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  92. Wiegel J, Ljungdahl LG, Rawson JR. Isolation from soil and properties of the extreme thermophile Clostridium thermohydrosulfuricum. J Bacteriol. 1979;139:800–810. doi: 10.1128/jb.139.3.800-810.1979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Woodward J, Orr M, Cordray K, Greenbaum E. Biotechnology: enzymatic production of biohydrogen. Nature. 2000;405:1014–1015. doi: 10.1038/35016633. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Wright JD. Ethanol from biomass by enzymatic hydrolysis. Chem Eng Prog. 1988;84(8):62–74. [Google Scholar]
  95. Wyss M, Brugger R, Kronenberger A, Re´my R, Fimbel R, Osterhelt G, Lehmann M, Van Loon APGM. Biochemical characterization of fungal phytases (myo-inositol hexakisphosphate phosphohydrolase): catalytic properties. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1999;65:367–373. doi: 10.1128/aem.65.2.367-373.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Ye X, Honda K, Sakai T, Okano K, Omasa T, Hirota R, Kuroda A, Ohtake H. Synthetic metabolic engineering—a novel, simple technology for designing a chimeric metabolic pathway. Microb Cell Fact. 2012;11:120–131. doi: 10.1186/1475-2859-11-120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Zeikus JG, Hegge PW, Anderson MA. Thermoanaerobacter brockii gen nov and sp nov, a new chemoorganotrophic, caldoactive, anaerobic bacterium. Arch Microbiol. 1979;122:41–48. doi: 10.1007/BF00408044. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Articles from 3 Biotech are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES