Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Pathology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Pathology
. 1977 Jun;30(6):569–574. doi: 10.1136/jcp.30.6.569

Immunohistochemical study of lichen planus.

S Shousha, J Svirbely
PMCID: PMC476470  PMID: 326819

Abstract

The distribution of IgM and IgG in 20 cases of lichen planus and five cases of non-specific inflammation were studied by the unlabelled antibody-enzyme (PAP) technique. Routine paraffin sections were used. In lichen planus deposits of immunoglobulins were seen in and around epithelial cells, in colloid bodies, at epidermo-dermal junctions, and in some inflammatory cells. All cases examined for IgM and eight out of 13 cases examined for IgG were positive. The peripheral migrating epidermal cells were mostly negative. The application of the PAP technique to skin biopsy and the significance of the findings in lichen planus are discussed.

Full text

PDF
569

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Abell E., Presbury D. G., Marks R., Ramnarain D. The diagnostic significance of immunoglobulin and fibrin deposition in lichen planus. Br J Dermatol. 1975 Jul;93(1):17–24. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.1975.tb06470.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Abell E., Ramnarain D. Epidermal antigens in lichen planus. Br J Dermatol. 1975 Jun;92(6):631–636. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.1975.tb03142.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Black M. M. The pathogenesis of lichen planus. Br J Dermatol. 1972 Mar;86(3):302–305. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.1972.tb02233.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Black M. M., Wilson-Jones E. The role of the epidermis in the histopathogenesis of lichen planus. Histochemical correlations. Arch Dermatol. 1972 Jan;105(1):81–86. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Burns J. Background staining and sensitivity of the unlabelled antibody-enzyme (PAP) method. Comparison with the peroxidase labelled antibody sandwich method using formalin fixed paraffin embedded material. Histochemistry. 1975 Jun 5;43(3):291–294. doi: 10.1007/BF00499711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Marks R., Black M., Jones E. W. Epidermal cell kinetics in lichen planus. Br J Dermatol. 1973 Jan;88(1):37–45. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.1973.tb06669.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Sarkany I., Gaylarde P. M. Ultrastructural and light microscopic changes of the epidermo-dermal junction. Trans St Johns Hosp Dermatol Soc. 1971;57(1):139–142. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Ueki H. Hyaline bodies in subepidermal papillae. Immunohistochemical studies in several dermatoses. Arch Dermatol. 1969 Nov;100(5):610–617. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Walker D. M. Identification of subpopulations of lymphocytes and macrophages in the infiltrate of lichen planus lesions of skin and oral mucosa. Br J Dermatol. 1976 May;94(5):529–534. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.1976.tb05141.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. de la Faille-Kuyper E. H., de la Faille H. B. An immunofluorescence study of lichen planus. Br J Dermatol. 1974 Apr;90(4):365–371. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.1974.tb06420.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Pathology are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES