Skip to main content
African Health Sciences logoLink to African Health Sciences
. 2015 Sep;15(3):737–747. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v15i3.6

Seropositivity and determinants of immunoglobulin-G (IgG) antibodies against Herpes simplex virus (HSV) types -1 and -2 in pregnant women in Port Harcourt, Nigeria

Iheanyi Omezuruike Okonko 1, Tochi Ifeoma Cookey 1
PMCID: PMC4765438  PMID: 26957960

Abstract

Background

This study is the first documented prevalence of IgG antibody against HSV-1&-2 in Port Harcourt, Nigeria and thus provides baseline data for future in-depth studies on HSV infection in South-South, Nigeria.

Objective

This study determined the seropositivity and determinants of serum IgG antibody against HSV-1 & HIV-2 among pregnant women attending BMSH, Port Harcourt, Rivers State, Nigeria.

Methods

Serum samples from 180 pregnant women attending antenatal clinic at Braithwaite Memorial Specialist Hospital (BMSH) in Port Harcourt, Nigeria. Serum samples were analysed with commercial HSV type-1&-2 specific IgG Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) kits. Chi-square analysis was used to determine the association of infection with socio-demographic variables.

Results

Of the 180 pregnant women, 179 (99.4%) were seropositive and 1(0.6%) was seronegative for HSV 1&2 IgG antibody. No statistical association existed between the prevalence of HSV-1&-2 IgG antibodies and the socio-demographic variables studied (p>0.05) except for marital status which was significantly associated (p<0.05).

Conclusion

Our data shows that HSV-1 & 2 seropositivity among pregnant women in Port Harcourt is high; thus serological screening for HSV-1&-2 might be advisable for antenatal attendees.

Keywords: BMSH, determinants, ELISA, HSV-1, HSV-2, IgG, seropositivity

Introduction

Amongst the human viral infections all over the world, herpes caused by herpes simplex virus (HSV) types-1 and HSV-2 were the most common 1. They are one of the most common viral sexually transmitted diseases (STD) worldwide23 and are now a major public health concern, established by the widespread of genital HSV and heightened acquisition of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infections in connotation with HSV acquisition45.

It has been projected that 90% of individuals globally remain seropositive for HSV-1 by the fourth decade of life, particularly persons within low socio-economic levels6. An estimate of 536 million people or approximately 16% of the population of the world in the age group 15–49 years have been shown to be living with HSV-2 worldwide7. More women than men have been shown to have acquired the virus7. A projection of 315 million females has been reported to be infected with HSV paralleled to an estimate of 221 million infected men7. The lowest prevalence was found in Western Europe, where prevalence reached a maximum of around 18% among women and 13% among men while the highest prevalence was in sub-Saharan Africa, where prevalence reached a maximum of 70% among women and around 55% among men7.

In order to properly manage herpes patients and develop approaches to avert spread of HSV, efficient serological testing is pertinent. The finding of type-particular antigens in HSV-1 and HSV-2, remarkably IgG antibodies, has remained effectively used to advance tests for the determination of particular HSV antibody [8]. The existence of particular antibodies offers proof of HSV-1, HSV-2, or HSV-1 and HSV-28. The seropositivity and determinants of IgG antibodies against HSV-1 &-2 amongst these pregnant women were examined using commercially available enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits.

Methods

Study area

The current study was steered from February 2013 to September, 2013 and was restricted to pregnant women presenting at the antenatal clinic of Braithwaite Memorial Specialist Hospital, Port Harcourt, Nigeria. BMSH is a government owned specialist hospital which is located in the old Government Reserved Area (G.R.A.) of Port Harcourt City. It is a frequently used hospital in Rivers State, which by feature of its setting delivers tertiary health-care services. Port Harcourt lies along the Bonny River in the Niger Delta and it coordinates are 4°53′23″N 6°54′18″E and located in a city 360 km2 (139 sq mi).

Study plan

This is a consecutive hospital based study which was implemented to determine the seropositivity of IgG antibodies against HSV-1 and HSV-2 amongst pregnant women in Port Harcourt, South South, Nigeria.

Study population

The targeted populace consist of all the pregnant women presenting at the antenatal clinic of BMSH from February to September, 2013. A total of 180 consented pregnant women were carefully chosen and registered for the study. The sociodemographic data were collected from their medical registers (Table 1). The information obtained were stratified as follows; the ages of the pregnant women were grouped into four groups- 20–25 years, 26–30 years, 31–35 years and 36–42 years; the marital status was classified as being married or single; the educational status was grouped into primary, secondary, post-secondary and tertiary education while occupational status was grouped as employed, self-employed, unemployed and students. Finally, the gestation periods were classified based on the trimesters the women were in at the time of the study; first, second or third trimesters.

Table 1.

The characteristics and serological outcomes

Variables Total HSV-1 &-2 IgG Statistics
No. % Positives % Negatives %
Age 20–25 30 16.7 30 100.0 0 0.0
26–30 73 40.6 73 100.0 0 0.0 χ2= 2.16995,
31–35 57 31.7 56 98.2 1 1.8 df = 3, p>0.05
36–42 20 11.1 20 100.0 0 0.0
Marital
status
Married 177 98.3 176 99.4 1 0.6 χ2= 0.017,
Singles 3 1.7 3 100.0 0 0.0 df = 1, p<0.05
Education Primary 1 0.6 1 100.0 0 0.0
Secondary 66 36.7 66 100.0 0 0.0
Post-secondary 12 6.7 12 100.0 0 0.0 χ2= 0.786548,
Tertiary 101 56.1 100 99.0 1 1.0 df = 3, p>0.05
Occupation Student 24 13.3 24 100.0 0 0.0
Unemployed 47 26.1 46 97.9 1 2.1
Self-employed 68 37.8 68 100.0 0 0.0 χ2= 2.8456,
Employed 41 22.8 41 100.0 0 0.0 df = 3, p>0.05
Gestation 1st trimester 28 15.6 28 100.0 0 0.0
2nd
trimester
93 51.7 92 98.9 1 1.1 χ2= 0.94071,
3rd trimester 59 32.8 59 100.0 0 0.0 df = 2, p>0.05
Total 180 100.0 179 99.4 1 0.6

Collection and preparation of samples

Five milliliters of venous blood were collected into sterile tubes from the enrolled subjects. These samples were centrifuged for 15 minutes and resultant sera were extracted into labelled eppendorf tubes. Sera were stored at temperature of −20°C until use.

Serology

Sera were examined for IgG antibodies against HSV-1 & HSV-2 using a commercially available ELISA kit manufactured by DIA.PRO Diagnostic Bioprobes Srl Via G. Carducci no 27 20099 Sesto San Giovanni, Milano, Italy. These tests were implemented as specified by the manufacturer.

Principle of the test

The HSV 1&2 IgG ELISA kit was built on the principle of IgG capture in which the microplates were coated with native inactivated HSV-1 and HSV-2. The dense stage was mainly treated with the weakened sample and anti-HSV IgG were taken, if existing, by the antigens. Subsequently washing out all the other constituents of the sample. In the second incubation, linked anti-HSV IgG were identified by adding polyclonal specific anti-hIgG antibodies, branded with peroxidase (HRP). The enzyme apprehended on the compacted segment, performing on the substrate/chromogen mix, creates an optical indicator that is proportionate to the quantity of anti-HSV IgG antibodies existing in the sample. A calibration curve plotted alongside a core gold standard, creates potentially, a quantifiable IgG antibodies determination in the sample. Interpretation of results were done as specified by the manufacturer.

Data analyses

Outcomes were presented and scrutinised using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) 20.0. The seropositivity was considered as the number of samples that tested positive to anti-HSV-1 and HSV-2 IgG antibodies over the number of samples screened multiply by 100. Chi-square test was employed to define relationships among sociodemographic characteristics of the participants. P<0.05 was set as the statistical significance level.

Results

Socio-demographic data

The characteristics of the pregnant women were stratified and presented in Table 1. The median age in the samples was 30.5 years (range, 20 to 42). The age groups; 26 – 30 years and 31 – 35 years constituted the largest populations making up 40.6% (n=73) and 31.7% (n=57) of the total population respectively, while 30 (16.7%) of the pregnant women were aged 20–25years and 20 (11.1%) were aged 36–42 years. Married pregnant women predominated the study constituting 98.3% of the sample compared to 1.7% of the population that was single. On the basis of educational background, 0.6%, 36.7%, 6.7% and 56.1% of the pregnant women were found to have acquired primary, secondary, post-secondary and tertiary education respectively. A lower percentage of 13.3% were students and 37.8% were self employed. While 22.8% of them were gainfully employed, 26.1% were unemployed.

Seropositivity of anti-HSV-1& HSV-2 IgG antibodies

From the 180 pregnant women examined, 179 (99.4%) women were seropositive for anti-HSV-1& HSV-2 IgG antibodies while 1 (0.6%) was seronegative for anti-HSV-1& HSV02 IgG antibodies. Table 1 shows the characteristics of the pregnant women tested and their serological outcomes.

Age-related seropositivity of anti-HSV-1 & HSV-2 IgG antibodies

The age-related seropositivity of anti-HSV-1 & HSV-2 IgG antibodies is presented in Figure 1. Seropositivity of 100.0% was recorded in 20–25 years, 26–30 years and 36–42 years age groups while 98.2% was found in age group 31–35 years. These differences was not statistically associated (χ2= 2.16995, df=3, p>0.05).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Age-related seropositivity of anti-HSV-1 & HSV-2 IgG antibodies

Seropositivity of anti-HSV-1 & HSV-2 IgG anti-bodies according to marital status

The seropositivity of anti-HSV-1 & HSV-2 IgG anti-bodies in accordance to the marital status is presented in Figure 2. The three single pregnant women were found to be seropositive (100%) for HSV-1&2 while 176 married women tested seropositive (99.4%). This difference was significantly associated (χ2= 0.017, df=1, p<0.05).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Marital status-related seropositivity of anti-HSV-1 & HSV-2 IgG antibodies

Seropositivity of anti-HSV-1 & HSV-2 IgG antibodies in relation to educational background

The educational background of these pregnant women showed no significant association with seropositivity of anti-HSV-1 & HSV-2 IgG antibodies (χ2= 0.786548, df=3, p>0.05) as presented in Figure 3. One hundred percent (100.0%) of the pregnant women having primary, secondary and post-secondary education had anti-HSV-1 & HSV-2 IgG antibodies while 99.0% seropositivity was documented in those with tertiary education (Table 1, Figure 3).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Seropositivity of anti-HSV1 & HSV-2 IgG antibodies in relation to educational background

Occupation-related seropositivity of anti-HSV-1 & HSV-2 IgG antibodies

Occupation-related seropositivity of anti-HSV-1 & HSV-2 IgG antibodies is presented in Figure 4. The pregnant women that were students, self employed and employed were all seropositive for anti-HSV-1 & HSV-2 having 100.0% seropositivity in each group while those that were unemployed had 97.9% seropositivity (46 of 47). However, these differences were not significantly related (χ2= 2.8456, df = 3, p>0.05).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Occupation-related seropositivity of anti-HSV-1 & HSV-2 IgG antibodies

Seropositivity of anti-HSV-1 & HSV-2 IgG anti-bodies in relation to gestation period

Gestation period related seropositivity of anti-HSV-1 & HSV-2 IgG antibodies is presented in Figure 5. It showed that participants in first and third trimesters had 100.0% seropositivity compared to those in their second trimester (98.9%). Nevertheless, this difference was not significantly associated (χ2= 0.94071, df = 2, p>0.05).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Gestation period related seropositivity of HSV 1&2 IgG antibodies

Discussion

HSV-1 and HSV-2 is a frequently occurring STI, and its prevalence has rose considerably in the past two eras in several advanced and developing countries2,9. Known co-factors for HSV transmission include race, sex, age, frequency of sexual contacts, non-use of condom, duration of relationship, history of STI, duration of HSV in the source partner, HIV infection, socioeconomic status and serological outcomes1013.

This study aimed at determining the seropositivity and determinants of anti-HSV-1 and HSV-2 IgG antibodies among pregnant women in Port Harcourt, Rivers State, South-South region of Nigeria and also to identify the demographic variables associated with the prevalence. Very high infection levels have been documented in the developing world of which Nigeria is one of them. Corey and Handsfield14 reported rates of 60 – 90% among gold miners and commercial sex workers respectively in South Africa. Prevalence rates ranging from 30 to 80% have been recorded among women in sub-Saharan Africa15. In Nigeria, Agabi et al.16 observed 87.0% prevalence in Jos, Nigeria. Kurewa et al.17 reported a preva lence of 51.1% among pregnant women in Zimbabwe. Though only pregnant women were used in this study, previous studies have shown that females were more prone to HSV infection than their male counterparts7. Conversely, in pregnant women, the danger related with mother-child transmission of HSV has turn into a key public health concern 9,1819. Genital infection by HSV-1 and HSV-2 amongst pregnant females is a main cause for apprehension because of the danger it poses to the fetus and newborns1819. Therefore, the assessment of HSV infection in pregnant women will help in the proper management of the infection and will also be useful for epidemiological purposes.

Anti-HSV-1 and HSV-2 IgG antibodies and its conno tation with certain risk and sociodemographic factors have been previously reported. This study revealed a high seropositivity rate (99.4%) of anti-HSV-1 and HSV-2 antibodies amongst pregnant women. HSV is most predominant among adult population; consequently2,9, several females have been exposed in advance to pregnancy2,9, eliciting the fact that most of the pregnant women have been open to each HSV-1 or HSV-2 or both that ensued in infection and formation of antibody2,9. This goes ahead to suggest a pointer of the possibility of HSV transmission amongst sexually active females2,9. This high rate is in concordance with various studies performed.

Ghazi et al.20 detected a high seropositivity of 90.9% and 27.1% for HSV-1 and HSV-2 IgG antibodies respectively in pregnant Saudi women. Also, Sauerbrei et al.21 found 82.0% and 18% of the pregnant women seropositive for HSV-1 and -2 type specific IgG antibodies respectively. In the United States, Xu et al.2 reported a 72% overall seropositivity of HSV amongst pregnant women. The 99.4% seropositivity for HSV in this study is higher than previously reported by some other authors. It is higher than 29.08% obtained by Apurba et al.22 and 18.6% reported by Sadiq et al.23 among pregnant mothers with bad obstetric history.

The serological status of the pregnant women in the present study was compared with socio-demographic variables such as age, marital status, education, occupations and gestation period. All the variables appeared to be statistically insignificantly associated (P> 0.05) with the prevalence of HSV IgG antibodies among the samples investigated except for marital status which was significantly associated with HSV IgG. This finding is similar to that obtained by Obeid24 in a study among pregnant women in Saudi Arabia who observed that there was no statistically significant association between age and occupation, and HSV-1 IgG. Obeid24 also observed that education was not significantly associated with HSV-2 IgG. Another study by Rezaei-Chaparpordi et al.25 found a significant correlation between age, marital status, occupation, and HSV seroprevalence. Kurewa et al.17 also reported that the danger for a seropositive STI rises with number of lifetime sexual partners, increasing ages greater than 30 years, multigravid, polygamy, partner taking alcohol and age at sexual debut.

In previous studies, seropositivity of HSV rose steadily with age through the age range or subsequently increased above age 3026. Consequently, it drops in older females greater than 40 years of age26. However, in the present study, a total prevalence rate of 100.0% was observed in the pregnant women from ages 20–25 years, 26–30 years and 36–42 years, with a slight decrease in ages 31–35 years. A maximum number of HSV seropositivity observed in age group 26–30 years is in cogni zance with a study by Apurba et al.22.

A higher prevalence was recorded among the single than married pregnant women (100.0% versus 99.4%) which agrees with Agabi et al.16 that also found a higher prevalence in singles compared to married individuals. This indicates that the single pregnant women included in this study should have had a greater lifetime sexual activity or have been infected in early childhood more than the married women. This results deviates from the higher prevalence rate of 71.2% observed by Rezaei-Chaparpordi et al.25 among subjects that were married than the singles in a study determining seroprevalence of HSV in Iran.

This study also showed a higher prevalence of HSV infection for pregnant women with lower educational status (100.0% for primary, secondary and post-secondary education) than those with tertiary education. This agrees with Malkin et al.27 who found a higher HSV-1 infection in people of lower education level in France. Rezaei-Chaparpordi et al.25 also observed an increase in prevalence of HSV antibodies with a decrease in level of education. It can be deduced from the present study that a higher risk of HSV is associated with a lower level of education. This might be explained by the fact that a lower level of education was an indicator of low socioeconomic status which was a risk factor for HSV infection. Lack of proper education might give rise to ignorance of HSV acquisition and prevention. Also, enlightenment on the significance of HSV diagnosis, treatment and preventive measures might aid the control of HSV-2 transmission.

A high prevalence of HSV IgG was observed in all occupational groups. This might be explained by the fact that a lower level of occupation (unemployed in this study) was an indicator of low socioeconomic status which was a risk factor for HSV infection. This observation deviates from a high seroprevalence found in lower socioeconomic group than in high socio-economic group according to studies performed by Apurba et al. 22 and Sadiq et al.23. The absence of a significant relationship found between education, occupation, and HSV seropositivity in this study compares favourably with Weiss15 who stated that educational status, socio-economic (including occupation) and religion had insignificant outcome on the seropositivity of HSV-1 and HSV-215.

A high prevalence rate was also found for pregnant women in their first and third trimester. This suggests that these groups of females were at a greater danger of acquiring HSV27 for instance, HSV gotten in the course of pregnancy is connected with spontaneous abortion27 which occur highest in first trimesters, and risk of neonatal transmission with highest risk occurring at third trimester. The study also showed a seronegativity of 0.6% among the pregnant women tested and is therefore at high risk and vulnerable to suffering a primary genital herpes. The danger of mother to child spread of HSV is utmost if a seronegative female acquire primary or secondary genital herpes close to the delivery, preceding to antibody development.

Conclusion

This study has confirmed the seropositivity of immunoglobulin-G (IgG) against HSV-1 and -2 among pregnant women. It also showed that the seropositivity of anti-HSV-1 and HSV-2 IgG antibodies among pregnant women in Port Harcourt, Nigeria is very high (99.4%). The study also showed that age, education, occupation and gestation period were insignificantly linked to HSV IgG seropositivity. However, the seropositivity of HSV IgG was significantly associated with marital status. It be deduced that the risk of unborn children contracting HSV would be greater in cases where pregnant women exhibit no immunity i.e. no antibodies. From the findings of this study conducted in Port Harcourt, Nigeria, pregnant women should be educated on the risks of neonatal herpes, particularly since they are likely to have the strongest motivation for avoiding infection from partners. HSV serological testing of women should be included as a routine test during pregnancy in Nigeria, not only to identify those at risk of acquisition, but also to observe the prevalence rates. To the best of our knowledge, the findings of this study is the first documented seropositivity of anti-HSV-1 and HSV-2 IgG antibodies among pregnant women in Port Harcourt, Nigeria which provides a baseline data for future in-depth studies on HSV infection in South South, Nigeria.

Acknowledgement

The authors wishes to appreciate the management and staff of Braithwaite Memorial Specialist Hospital, Port Harcourt, Nigeria for their approval and assistance during this study. The exceptional technical support of Miss EM Okoli and Miss EJ Anah amongst others is also appreciated.

References

  • 1.Brugha R, Keersmaekers K, Renton A. Genital herpes infection: a review. International Journal of Epidemiology. 1997;26:698–709. doi: 10.1093/ije/26.4.698. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Xu F, Sternberg MR, Kottiri BJ, McQuillan GM, Lee FK, Nahmias AJ, Berman SM, Markowitz LE. Trends in herpes simplex virus type1 and type 2, seroprevalence in the United States. Journal of American Medical Association. 2006;296(8):964–973. doi: 10.1001/jama.296.8.964. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Cusini M, Ghislanzoni M. The importance of diagnosing genital herpes. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 2001;47:9–16. doi: 10.1093/jac/47.suppl_1.9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Mbopi-Keou FX, Robinson NJ, Mayaud P, Belec L, Brown DWG. Herpes simplex virus type 2 and heterosexual spread of human immunodeficiency virus infection in developing countries: hypothesis and research priorities. Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. 2003;9:161–171. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0691.2003.00550.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Celum C L. The Interaction between Herpes Simplex Virus and Human Immunodeficiency Virus. Herpes. 2004;1:36A–44A. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Brown ZA, Selke S, Zeh J, Kopelman J, Maslow A, Ashley RL, Watts DH, Berry S, Herd M, Corey L. The acquisition of herpes simplex virus during pregnancy. New England Journal of Medicine. 1997;337(8):509–515. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199708213370801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Looker KL, Garnetta GP, Schmid GP. An estimate of the global prevalence and incidence of herpes simplex virus type 2 infection. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2008;86(10):805–812. doi: 10.2471/BLT.07.046128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Slomka MJ. Seroepidemiology and control of genital herpes: the value of type specific antibodies to herpes simplex virus. Communicable Disease Report. 1996;6(Review No. 3):R41. ISSN:1350-9349. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kriebs JM. Understanding herpes simplex virus: transmission, diagnosis, and considerations in pregnancy management. Journal of Midwifery and Womens Health. 2008;53:202–208. doi: 10.1016/j.jmwh.2008.01.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Whitley RJ. Herpes Simplex Viruses. In: Knipe DM, Howley PM, Griffin DE, et al., editors. Fields Virology. 4th edition. Vol. 2. New York: Lippincott; 2001. pp. 2461–2509. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Stock C, Guillén-Grima F, de Mendoza JH, Marin-Fernandez B, Aguinaga-Ontoso I, Krämer A. Risk factors of herpes simplex type 1 (HSV-1) infection and lifestyle factors associated with HSV-1 manifestations. European Journal of Epidemiology. 2001;17:885–890. doi: 10.1023/a:1015652713971. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Clemens SA, Farhat CK. Seroprevalence of herpes simplex 1–2 antibodies in Brazil. Revista de Saúde Pública. 2010;44:726–734. doi: 10.1590/s0034-89102010000400017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Stowe RP, Peek MK, Perez NA, Yetman DL, Cutchin MP, Goodwin JS. Herpes virus reactivation and socioeconomic position: A community-based study. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health. 2010;64:666–671. doi: 10.1136/jech.2008.078808. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Corey L, Handsfield HH. Gential herpes and public health: Addressing a global problem. Journal of the American Medical Association. 2000;283:791–794. doi: 10.1001/jama.283.6.791. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Weiss H. Epidemiology of herpes Simplex Virus Type-2 infections in the developing world. Herpes. 2004;11:24A–35A. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Agabi YA, Banwat EB, Mawak JD, Lar PM, Dashe N, Dashen MM, Adoga MP, Agabi FY, Zakari H. Seroprevalence of herpes simplex virus type-2 among patients attending the Sexually Transmitted Infections Clinic in Jos, Nigeria. Journal of Infection in Developing Countries. 2010;4(9):572–575. doi: 10.3855/jidc.567. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kurewa NE, Mapingure MP, Munjoma MW, Chirenje MZ, Rusakaniko S, Stray-Pedersen B. The burden and risk factors of Sexually Transmitted Infections and Reproductive Tract Infections among pregnant women in Zimbabwe. BMC Infectious Diseases. 2010;10:127. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-10-127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Baker DA. Consequences of herpes simplex virus in pregnancy and their prevention. Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases. 2007;20:73–76. doi: 10.1097/QCO.0b013e328013cb19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Sauerbrei A, Wutzler P. Herpes simplex and varicella-zoster virus infections during pregnancy: current concepts of prevention, diagnosis and therapy. Part 1: herpes simplex virus infections. Medical Microbiology and Immunology. 2007;196:89–94. doi: 10.1007/s00430-006-0031-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ghazi H O, Telmesani A M, Mahomed M F. TORCH agents in pregnant Saudi women. Medical Principles and Practice. 2002;11(4):180–182. doi: 10.1159/000065813. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Sauerbrei A, Schmitt S, Scheper T, Brandstädt A, Saschenbrecker S, Motz M, Soutschek E, Wutzler P. Seroprevalence of Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 and type 2 in Thuringia, Germany, 1999 to 2006. Eurosurveillance. 2011;(16):44. http://www.eurosurveillance.org/ViewArticle.aspx?ArticleId=20005. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Apurba SS, Sandhya BK, Senthamarai S, Sivasankari S, Kumudavathi MS, Anitha C, Amshavathani SK. Serological Evaluation of Herpes Simplex Virus Type- 1/ Type- 2 Infections in Pregnant Women with Bad Obstetric History in a Tertiary Care Hospital, Kanchipuram. International Journal of Advanced Research. 2013;1(3):123–128. (2013) [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Sadiq MS, Fatima H, Jamil K, Patil C. Study of TORCH profile in patients with bad obstetric history. Biology and Medicine. 2012;4(2):95–101. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Obeid OE. Prevalence of herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2 and associated sociodemographic variables in pregnant women attending king fahd hospital of the university. Journal of Family and Community Medicine. 2007;14(1):3–7. (2007) [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Rezaei-Chaparpordi S, Assmar M, Amirmozafari N, Modiri L, Massiha A, Shokri-Fashtali S, Gholizadeh Z, Akbari S. Seroepidemiology of Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 and 2 in Northern Iran. Iranian Journal of Public Health. 2012;41(8):75–79. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Smith JS, Robinson NJ. Age-specific prevalence of infection with herpes simplex virus types 2 and 1: a global review. Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2002;186:3–28. doi: 10.1086/343739. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Malkin JE, Morand P, Malvy D, Ly T D, Chanzy B, De Labareyre C, El Hasnaoui A, Hercberg S. Seroprevalence of HSV-1 and HSV-2 infection in the general French population. Sexually Transmitted Infections. 2002;78:201–203. doi: 10.1136/sti.78.3.201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from African Health Sciences are provided here courtesy of Makerere University Medical School

RESOURCES