Abstract
The WW domain-containing oxidoreductase (WWOX) gene is a tumor suppressor gene, the abnormal expression of which will lead to osteosarcoma tumorigenesis. Polymorphisms of the WWOX gene are associated with the risk of several malignancies. We hypothesized that genetic variations in the WWOX gene were related to osteosarcoma risk and outcome. In this case-control study, we recruited 276 young osteosarcoma patients and 286 controls from the East Chinese population and genotyped seven tag single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of the WWOX gene (rs10220974C>T, rs12918952G>A, rs3764340C>G, rs1074963C>G, rs383362G>T, rs1424110A>G, and rs12828A>G). We discovered that two SNPs (rs3764340C>G and rs383362G>T) were associated with osteosarcoma risk. The CG genotype and dominant model of rs3764340 indicated elevated risk of osteosarcoma, and similar results were found for rs383362. Furthermore, rs3754340C>G was also related to grade and metastasis risk of osteosarcoma. Taken together, our results provide the first evidence that WWOX gene polymorphisms have the potential to be predictive factors for assessing risk and outcome of osteosarcoma.
Keywords: osteosarcoma, WWOX, SNP, metastasis, susceptibility
Introduction
Osteosarcoma is the most common musculoskeletal malignancy in childhood and adolescence, characterized by early metastatic potential to the lung and poor prognosis.1 Nonsurgical therapeutic regimens, which are essential for osteosarcoma treatment, consist of chemotherapies composed of four agents. However, some osteosarcoma patients suffer from chemoresistance and require more aggressive chemotherapy strategies. Furthermore, there are still only limited biomarkers (that can be easily detected in the laboratory) for predicting outcomes or malignancy risk.
Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are genetic factors that have been associated with cancer risk or progression. Studies on SNPs in osteosarcoma are valuable for identifying prognostic markers. Efforts have focused on the identification of reliable associations between polymorphisms in different genes and osteosarcoma risk, such as ERCC,2 VEGF,3 NAT2,4 etc. However, studies on tumor suppressor gene polymorphisms in osteosarcoma are still limited.
The WW-domain containing oxidoreductase (WWOX) gene was demonstrated as a bona fide tumor suppressor gene, located on chromosome 16q23, spanning the common fragile site FRA16D.5 Evidence suggested that the WWOX gene plays an important role in preventing osteosarcoma tumorigenesis, as WWOX knockout mice showed significantly increased osteosarcoma susceptibility.6 Furthermore, in in vitro studies that increased expression of WWOX via transfection in tumor cell lines, tumor suppression activities were demonstrated.7,8 In addition, it was recently discovered that normally expressed WWOX inhibits osteosarcoma metastasis by modulating the function of some downstream proteins,9 and attenuation of the WWOX gene in osteosarcoma was associated with elevated tumorigenicity.10,11 Polymorphisms of the WWOX gene were also found to be related to risk of incidence or outcome of some other solid tumors, such as glioma,12 lung cancer,13 and thyroid cancer.14 Given the fact that WWOX plays a role in osteosarcoma, and that its gene polymorphisms were related to solid tumor risk, it is reasonable to hypothesize that WWOX polymorphisms are involved in progression osteosarcoma and that WWOX SNPs have potential as predicting factors.
In order to test the hypothesis that WWOX polymorphisms are correlated with osteosarcoma risk or progression in young Chinese individuals, four hospitals and institutions located in East China participated in this project and shared clinical data. A case-control study was launched, and we analyzed seven WWOX tagging SNPs in 276 osteosarcoma patients and 286 controls from a young East China population.
Material and methods
Ethics approval
This case-control study was approved by the Ethics Committees of the four participating institutions (Shaoxing Shangyu People’s Hospital, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, The First People’s Hospital of Wenling, and Shanghai Fudan University). All investigations were performed according to the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent to participate in genomic research was obtained beforehand from each participant or their guardians.
Study participants
A total of 276 newly diagnosed primary osteosarcoma patients under the age of 20 years and 286 cancer-free controls were recruited in this study. All patients were diagnosed on the basis of pathologic evidence, and samples were collected during the period from February 2007 to September 2012. All patients underwent appropriate surgical resections (including limb salvage and amputation) by qualified orthopedic surgeons, as well as nonsurgical therapeutic regimens according to the guidelines, and were followed up regularly for at least 36 months. All clinical information was obtained from medical records. Cancer-free controls were recruited from nonpathological fracture cases, and were matched to patient cases by age and sex. Blood samples were obtained from each participant, and tumor tissues were preserved in liquid nitrogen.
DNA isolation
Whole DNA was isolated from blood samples by standard phenol–chloroform extraction and ethanol precipitation. Genomic DNA was isolated using a DNA Blood Mini Kit (Qiagen, Berlin, Germany). For tumor tissues, proteinase K digestion was performed followed by phenol–chloroform extraction.
SNP genotyping
Seven SNPs (WWOX rs10220974C>T, rs12918952G>A, rs3764340C>G, rs1074963C>G, rs383362G>T, rs1424110A>G, and rs12828A>G) were selected for this study. Procedures were followed according to methods described in our previous study.4 Briefly, the Sequence Detection Software of the ABI StepOnePlus System (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) was used to collect data. TaqMan® primers and probes were designed by the ABI Assays-by-Design custom service. All tests were performed on samples in triplicate and repeated twice. Amplification conditions were 95°C for 10 minutes, followed by 40 cycles at 95°C for 15 seconds, and at 60°C for 60 seconds. Plates were read with the corresponding ABI Software.
Haplotype analysis
The computational haplotyping method was utilized in this study. The seven SNPs were analyzed on SHEsis (http://analysis.bio-x.cn/myAnalysis.php) to identify frequent haplotypes (those with proportions over 3%).
Statistical analysis
SPSS software (v21.0; IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA) was used for statistical analysis. Similar to our previous research, statistical differences in distributions of selected variables, subject characteristics, and genotypes for WWOX were evaluated between osteosarcoma cases and controls by χ2 tests. Odd ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated to test for correlations between the seven SNPs and the risk of osteosarcoma incidence. Logistic regression analyses were performed to calculate crude ORs, and ORs were subsequently adjusted for age and sex. The Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium for SNPs was tested using Pearson’s χ2 test. Statistical significance was defined as P<0.05, and all analyses were two-sided.
Results
Clinical features
Clinical characteristics of the included samples are shown in Table 1. In this study, we recruited 276 osteosarcoma cases and 286 controls. There were 162 male and 114 female patients. The median ages and ranges of the osteosarcoma cases and controls were 16 years (6–20 years) and 16.24 years (5–20 years), respectively. Tumors were graded according to the Enneking GTM system.15 No statistical differences in age or sex were found between the two groups (P=0.378 and 0.458, respectively).
Table 1.
General characteristics of the subjects
| Variables | Osteosarcoma cases, n (%) | Controls, n (%) | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (mean ± SD) | 16±3.28 | 16.24±3.30 | 0.378 |
| Sex | |||
| Male | 162 (58.70) | 159 (55.59) | 0.458 |
| Female | 114 (41.30) | 127 (44.41) | |
| Location | |||
| Trunk | 34 (12.32) | ||
| Limbs | 242 (87.68) | ||
| Enneking stages | |||
| IA or IB | 42 (15.22) | ||
| IIA or IIB or III | 234 (84.78) | ||
| Operation | |||
| Amputation | 55 (19.93) | ||
| Limb salvage | 221 (80.07) | ||
| Metastasis | |||
| Yes | 53 (19.20) | ||
| No | 223 (80.80) | ||
Abbreviation: SD, standard deviation.
Associations between WWOX polymorphisms and risk of osteosarcoma
The seven SNPs (rs10220974C>T, rs12918952G>A, rs3764340C>G, rs1074963C>G, rs383362G>T, rs1424110A>G, and rs12828A>G) tested in this study are shown in Table 2. Genotype distributions of each of the seven SNPs were in Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium in the control group (P=0.356, 0.800, 0.212, 0.641, 0.305, 0.261, and 0.152, respectively). For WWOX rs3764340C>G, single locus analyses showed no statistical difference in genotype between cases and controls. However, when the CC homozygote genotype was used as the reference group, the CG genotype showed significantly increased risk of osteosarcoma (CG vs CC: crude OR =1.73, 95% CI =1.15–2.61, P=0.009; adjusted OR =1.74, 95% CI =1.15–2.63, P=0.009). The GG genotype was not related to risk of osteosarcoma (although a borderline difference was found). In the dominant model, an even stronger statistical difference was detected (CG/GG vs CC: crude OR =1.82, 95% CI =1.23–2.69, P=0.003; adjusted OR =1.82, 95% CI =1.22–2.70, P=0.003). In the recessive model, no statistically significant differences were found.
Table 2.
Logistic regression analyses of correlations between WWOX rs10220974C>T, rs12918952G>A, rs3764340C>G, rs1074963C>G, rs383362G>T, rs1424110A>G, and rs12828A>G polymorphisms and risk of osteosarcoma
| WWOX genotype | Cases (N=276)
|
Controls (N=286)
|
Crude OR (95% Cl) | P-value | Adjusted OR (95% Cl) | P-value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n | % | n | % | |||||
| WWOX rs10220974 C>T | ||||||||
| CC | 211 | 76.45 | 228 | 79.72 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| CT | 61 | 22.10 | 53 | 18.53 | 1.24 (0.82–1.88) | 0.301 | 1.24 (0.82–1.88) | 0.308 |
| TT | 4 | 1.45 | 5 | 1.75 | 0.86 (0.23–3.26) | 0.830 | 0.85 (0.23–3.22) | 0.812 |
| CT + TT | 65 | 23.55 | 58 | 20.28 | 1.21 (0.81–1.81) | 0.349 | 1.21 (0.81–1.80) | 0.360 |
| CC + CT | 272 | 98.55 | 281 | 98.25 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| TT | 4 | 1.45 | 5 | 1.75 | 0.83 (0.22–3.11) | 0.78 | 0.81 (0.22–3.07) | 0.76 |
| WWOX rs12918952 G>A | ||||||||
| GG | 251 | 90.94 | 257 | 89.86 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| GA | 23 | 8.33 | 28 | 9.79 | 0.84 (0.47–1.50) | 0.557 | 0.83 (0.46–1.48) | 0.520 |
| AA | 2 | 0.72 | 1 | 0.35 | 2.05 (0.19–22.73) | 0.559 | 2.25 (0.20–25.13) | 0.509 |
| GA + AA | 25 | 9.05 | 29 | 10.14 | 0.88 (0.50–1.55) | 0.664 | 0.87 (0.50–1.54) | 0.638 |
| GG + GA | 274 | 99.28 | 285 | 99.65 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| AA | 2 | 0.72 | 1 | 0.35 | 2.08 (0.19–23.07) | 0.551 | 2.29 (0.21–25.51) | 0.501 |
| WWOX rs3764340C>G | ||||||||
| CC | 194 | 70.29 | 232 | 81.12 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| CG | 71 | 25.72 | 49 | 17.13 | 1.73 (1.15–2.61) | 0.009* | 1.74 (1.15–2.63) | 0.009* |
| GG | 11 | 3.99 | 5 | 1.75 | 2.63 (0.90–7.70) | 0.078 | 2.57 (0.88–7.56) | 0.086 |
| CG + GG | 82 | 29.71 | 54 | 18.88 | 1.82 (1.23–2.69) | 0.003* | 1.82 (1.22–2.70) | 0.003* |
| CC + CG | 265 | 96.01 | 281 | 98.25 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| GG | 11 | 3.99 | 5 | 1.75 | 2.33 (0.80–6.80) | 0.121 | 2.27 (0.78–6.63) | 0.135 |
| WWOX rs1074963C>G | ||||||||
| CC | 4 | 1.45 | 7 | 2.45 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| CG | 72 | 26.09 | 69 | 24.13 | 1.83 (0.51–6.52) | 0.354 | 1.93 (0.54–6.93) | 0.312 |
| GG | 200 | 72.46 | 210 | 73.43 | 1.67 (0.48–5.78) | 0.421 | 1.79 (0.51–6.24) | 0.363 |
| CG + GG | 272 | 98.55 | 279 | 97.55 | 1.71 (0.49–5.89) | 0.398 | 1.83 (0.53–6.34) | 0.344 |
| CC + CG | 76 | 27.54 | 76 | 26.58 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| GG | 200 | 72.46 | 210 | 73.43 | 0.95 (0.66–1.38) | 0.797 | 0.97 (0.67–1.41) | 0.862 |
| WWOX rs383362G>T | ||||||||
| GG | 190 | 68.84 | 223 | 77.97 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| GT | 77 | 27.90 | 57 | 19.93 | 1.59 (1.07–2.35) | 0.022* | 1.56 (1.05–2.32) | 0.027* |
| TT | 9 | 3.26 | 6 | 2.10 | 1.76 (0.62–5.04) | 0.292 | 1.65 (0.57–4.77) | 0.354 |
| GT + TT | 86 | 31.16 | 63 | 22.03 | 1.60 (1.10–2.34) | 0.015* | 1.57 (1.07–2.30) | 0.020* |
| GG + GT | 267 | 96.74 | 280 | 97.90 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| TT | 9 | 3.26 | 6 | 2.10 | 1.57 (0.55–4.48) | 0.396 | 1.46 (0.51–4.21) | 0.480 |
| WWOX rs1424110A>G | ||||||||
| AA | 88 | 31.88 | 108 | 37.76 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| AG | 136 | 49.28 | 127 | 44.41 | 1.31 (0.91–1.91) | 0.149 | 1.31 (0.90–1.90) | 0.154 |
| GG | 52 | 18.84 | 51 | 17.83 | 1.25 (0.78–2.02) | 0.358 | 1.25 (0.78–2.02) | 0.356 |
| AG + GG | 188 | 68.12 | 178 | 62.24 | 1.30 (0.92–1.84) | 0.144 | 1.29 (0.91–1.83) | 0.148 |
| AA + AG | 224 | 81.16 | 235 | 82.17 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| GG | 52 | 18.84 | 51 | 17.83 | 1.07 (0.70–1.64) | 0.757 | 1.07 (0.70–1.65) | 0.747 |
| WWOX rs12828A>G | ||||||||
| AA | 20 | 7.25 | 24 | 8.39 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| AG | 125 | 45.29 | 135 | 47.20 | 1.11 (0.59–2.11) | 0.747 | 1.09 (0.57–2.08) | 0.796 |
| GG | 131 | 47.46 | 127 | 44.41 | 1.24 (0.65–2.35) | 0.515 | 1.21 (0.63–2.30) | 0.570 |
| AG + GG | 256 | 92.75 | 262 | 91.61 | 1.17 (0.63–2.18) | 0.614 | 1.15 (0.62–2.13) | 0.668 |
| AA + AG | 145 | 52.54 | 159 | 55.59 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| GG | 131 | 47.46 | 127 | 44.41 | 1.13 (0.81–1.58) | 0.467 | 1.12 (0.80–1.56) | 0.502 |
Notes: ORs were adjusted for age and sex.
Statistically significant (P>0.05).
Abbreviations: OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.
Similar to rs3764340C>G, there was an association between the WWOX rs383362G>T SNP and osteosarcoma risk. The GT genotype was associated with an increased risk of osteosarcoma (GT vs GG: crude OR =1.59, 95% CI =1.07–2.35, P=0.022; adjusted OR =1.56, 95% CI =1.05–2.32, P=0.027). Although no correlation with osteosarcoma risk was found for the TT genotype, the dominant model (GT/TT) showed evidence for association with risk of osteosarcoma (GT/TT vs GG: crude OR =1.60, 95% CI =1.10–2.34, P=0.015; adjusted OR =1.57, 95% CI =1.07–2.30, P=0.020).
No association for osteosarcoma susceptibility in the young Chinese population was found for the remaining five SNPs (rs10220974C>T, rs12918952G>A, rs1074963C>G, rs1424110A>G, and rs12828A>G).
Associations between WWOX polymorphisms and stage or metastasis of osteosarcoma
Data on clinical features (location, surgical stage, operation method, and metastasis) of osteosarcoma cases were collected to reliably investigate the relationship between SNPs and incidence of osteosarcoma (Table 3). For WWOX rs3764340C>G, the frequency of the genotype CG at late Enneking stages (28.63%) was greater when compared with early-stage cases (9.52%), and a statistical difference in frequency distribution was found (P=0.033). Moreover, a similar result was shown for metastasis. The genotype CG displayed higher frequency (32.08%) in metastatic cases compared with metastasis-free cases (24.22%), and the difference in frequency distribution was statistically significant (P=0.027).
Table 3.
Association between genotype frequencies of WWOX rs3764340 and clinical features in osteosarcoma cases
| Variables | n | CC, n (%) | CG, n (%) | GG, n (%) | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Location | |||||
| Trunk | 34 | 26 (76.47) | 5 (14.71) | 3 (8.82) | 0.115 |
| Limbs | 242 | 168 (69.42) | 66 (27.27) | 8 (3.31) | |
| Enneking stages | |||||
| IA or IB | 42 | 36 (85.71) | 4 (9.52) | 2 (4.76) | 0.033* |
| IIA or IIB or III | 234 | 158 (67.52) | 67 (28.63) | 9 (3.85) | |
| Operation | |||||
| Amputation | 55 | 42 (76.36) | 10 (18.18) | 3 (5.45) | 0.324 |
| Limb salvage | 221 | 152 (68.78) | 61 (27.60) | 8 (3.62) | |
| Metastasis | |||||
| Yes | 53 | 31 (58.49) | 17 (32.08) | 5 (9.43) | 0.027* |
| No | 223 | 163 (73.08) | 54 (24.22) | 6 (2.69) | |
Note:
Statistically significant (P>0.05).
For WWOX rs383362G>T, however, no correlation was found between the rs383362 SNP and clinical characteristics. Although the rs383362G>T SNP was found to be related to osteosarcoma susceptibility, it was not associated with osteosarcoma location (P=0.357), stage (P=0.939), operation method (P=0.141), or metastasis (P=0.539) (data shown in Table 4). The confounding variables are listed in Tables 5 and 6.
Table 4.
Association between genotype frequencies of WWOX rs383362 and clinical features in osteosarcoma cases
| Variables | n | GG n (%) | GT n (%) | TT n (%) | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Location | |||||
| Trunk | 34 | 20 (58.8) | 13 (38.24) | 1 (2.94) | 0.357 |
| Limbs | 242 | 170 (70.25) | 64 (26.45) | 8 (3.31) | |
| Enneking stages | |||||
| IA or IB | 42 | 29 (69.05) | 12 (28.57) | 1 (2.38) | 0.939 |
| IIA or IIB or III | 234 | 161 (68.80) | 65 (27.78) | 9 (3.42) | |
| Operation | |||||
| Amputation | 55 | 32 (58.18) | 20 (36.36) | 3 (5.45) | 0.141 |
| Limb salvage | 221 | 158 (71.49) | 57 (25.79) | 6 (2.71) | |
| Metastasis | |||||
| Yes | 53 | 35 (66.04) | 15 (28.30) | 3 (5.66) | 0.539 |
| No | 223 | 155 (69.51) | 62 (27.80) | 6 (2.69) | |
Table 5.
Confounding variables (Enneking stages)
| Confounding variables | IA or IB cases, n (%) | IIA or IIB or III cases, n (%) | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, mean ± SD (years) | 16.50±2.84 | 15.91±3.35 | 0.284 |
| Sex | |||
| Male | 21 (50) | 141 (60.26) | 0.214 |
| Female | 21 (50) | 93 (39.74) | |
Abbreviation: SD, standard deviation.
Table 6.
Confounding variables (metastasis)
| Confounding variables | Metastasis cases, n (%) | Nonmetastasis cases, n (%) | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, mean ± SD (years) | 15.72±3.57 | 16.07±3.21 | 0.485 |
| Sex | |||
| Male | 34 (64.15) | 128 (57.40) | 0.370 |
| Female | 19 (35.85) | 95 (42.60) | |
Abbreviation: SD, standard deviation.
Haplotype analyses showed statistical differences between cases and controls
Online analyses of seven SNPs revealed eight frequent haplotypes (frequency over 3%): CGCCGAG, CGCGGAA, CGCGGAG, CGCGGGA, CGCGGGG, CGCGTGG, CGGGAG, and CGGGGG (Table 7). Among them, CGCGGAG and CGCGTGG showed statistically significant differences between cases and controls (P<0.001, 95% CI =0.41–0.75; P=0.005, 95% CI =1.30–5.23, respectively).
Table 7.
Haplotype analysis
| Haplotype | Cases (N=276)
|
Controls (N=286)
|
P-value | OR (95% Cl) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| n (frequency) | n (frequency) | |||
| CGCCGAG | 16.55 (0.03) | 24.22 (0.04) | 0.236 | 0.68 (0.36–1.29) |
| CGCGGAA | 56.81 (0.10) | 56.60 (0.01) | 0.917 | 1.02 (0.69–1.52) |
| CGCGGAG | 105.19 (0.19) | 159.12 (0.28) | <0.001* | 0.56 (0.41–0.75) |
| CGCGGGA | 41.18 (0.08) | 47.53 (0.08) | 0.522 | 0.87 (0.56–1.35) |
| CGCGGGG | 66.81 (0.12) | 89.56 (0.16) | 0.055 | 0.71 (0.50–1.01) |
| CGCGTGG | 28.45 (0.05) | 11.58 (0.02) | 0.005* | 2.60 (1.30–5.23) |
| CGGGGAG | 20.08 (0.04) | 11.09 (0.02) | 0.092 | 1.88 (0.89–3.97) |
| CGGGGGG | 18.96 (0.03) | 10.09 (0.02) | 0.086 | 1.95 (0.90–4.24) |
Note:
Statistically significant (P<0.05).
Abbreviations: OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.
Discussion
Studies on new therapeutic strategies against osteosarcoma are emerging, especially for different kinds of immunotherapy, which are showing promising results.16–18 However, prediction factors, especially those that can be easily detected in laboratory assays, remain limited. Recently, several studies have revealed potential factors that may be utilized to predict osteosarcoma outcome or metastasis risk,19,20 but studies based on clinical data have still been limited (or have sometimes had controversial results). Given that osteosarcoma is not a common malignancy, we collected blood samples and tumor tissues of osteosarcoma patients from different hospitals located in East China (which has a stable population of over 100 million) and tried to identify indicators predictive of disease risk. In our previous study, our colleagues found that NAT2 gene polymorphisms were associated with osteosarcoma risk,4 but the reason for the effects of NAT2 polymorphisms on osteosarcoma risk and outcome has remained unclear. We therefore continued to search for genes involved in osteosarcoma pathogenesis using our blood and tissue sample bank.
Currently, clinicians usually make therapeutic plans for osteosarcomas based on imaging data and clinical symptoms, while laboratory examinations are seldom used. If effective genotype analyses could be established, clinicians would have more evidence for making decisions on more radical therapeutic regimens for high-risk patients. In this case-control study, we discovered that WWOX rs3764340C>G and rs383362G>T SNPs were associated with increased risk of osteosarcoma. Furthermore, to determine if WWOX SNPs are associated with outcomes of osteosarcoma, we analyzed SNPs with clinical data, including age, sex, location, grade, operation method, and metastasis. Here, we demonstrated that rs3764340C>G was related to the grade of osteosarcoma and metastasis. Moreover, although rs383362G>T was found to be associated with osteosarcoma risk, no correlation was found in grade or metastasis risk. As WWOX is an established tumor suppressor gene, our results, indicating that polymorphisms in this gene are related to osteosarcoma, seem reasonable. We therefore believe that people with particular WWOX genotypes will have corresponding osteosarcoma risks and outcomes.
In addition to SNP analyses, haplotyping was performed. The haplotype CGCGGAG was more frequent in normal individuals, while CGCGTGG (which replaced G with T) was more common in osteosarcoma patients. This result provides evidence that rs383362G>T plays a role in osteosarcoma.
Other studies on WWOX rs3764340 revealed similar results. The CG/GG genotype of rs3764340 was accompanied by elevated risk of gastric cardia adenocarcinoma,21 lung cancer,13 and thyroid carcinoma,14 consistent with our results. Thus, we propose that carriers of the G allele of WWOX rs3764340 may have increased cancer risk.
There are some limitations to our study. First, all blood or tumor tissue samples were collected from hospitals and, consequently, inherent bias might have affected our results. Second, due to the low morbidity of osteosarcoma, the sample size was limited, especially for homozygotic cases, which limits the statistical power. Third, as over half the recruited patients were still alive, we were not able to provide data analysis on survival. We will continue collecting samples and tracking clinical data to provide updated research results. Indeed, given the low morbidity of osteosarcoma (as low as around 5 per million), a prospective study would not be easy to implement and, consequently, we have no plans for such a study at present.
In summary, this study demonstrates that WWOX rs3764340 and rs383362 polymorphisms are associated with osteosarcoma susceptibility in young Chinese individuals. The WWOX rs3764340 polymorphism was thus correlated with surgical grade and metastatic risk of osteosarcoma.
Footnotes
Disclosure
The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.
References
- 1.Picci P. Osteosarcoma (osteogenic sarcoma) Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2007;2:6. doi: 10.1186/1750-1172-2-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Li J, Liu S, Wang W, et al. ERCC polymorphisms and prognosis of patients with osteosarcoma. Tumour Biol. 2014;35:10129–10136. doi: 10.1007/s13277-014-2322-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Wang Z, Wen P, Luo X, et al. Association of the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) gene single-nucleotide polymorphisms with osteosarcoma susceptibility in a Chinese population. Tumour Biol. 2014;35:3605–3610. doi: 10.1007/s13277-013-1475-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Huang Z, Yuan L, Jiang Z, Wang D. Associations of polymorphisms in NAT2 gene with risk and metastasis of osteosarcoma in young Chinese population. Onco Targets Ther. 2015;8:2675–2680. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S92275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Abu-Odeh M, Salah Z, Herbel C, Hofmann TG, Aqeilan RI. WWOX, the common fragile site FRA16D gene product, regulates ATM activation and the DNA damage response. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111:E4716–E4725. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1409252111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Aqeilan RI, Trapasso F, Hussain S, et al. Targeted deletion of Wwox reveals a tumor suppressor function. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:3949–3954. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0609783104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Fabbri M, Iliopoulos D, Trapasso F, et al. WWOX gene restoration prevents lung cancer growth in vitro and in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:15611–15616. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0505485102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Gourley C, Paige AJ, Taylor KJ, et al. WWOX gene expression abolishes ovarian cancer tumorigenicity in vivo and decreases attachment to fibronectin via integrin α3. Cancer Res. 2009;69:4835–4842. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-2974. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Del MS, Aqeilan RI. Tumor suppressor WWOX inhibits osteosarcoma metastasis by modulating RUNX2 function. Sci Rep. 2015;5:12959. doi: 10.1038/srep12959. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kurek KC, Del MS, Salah Z, et al. Frequent attenuation of the WWOX tumor suppressor in osteosarcoma is associated with increased tumorigenicity and aberrant RUNX2 expression. Cancer Res. 2010;70:5577–5586. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-4602. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Abdeen SK, Del MS, Hussain S, et al. Conditional inactivation of the mouse Wwox tumor suppressor gene recapitulates the null phenotype. J Cell Physiol. 2013;228:1377–1382. doi: 10.1002/jcp.24308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Yu K, Fan J, Ding X, et al. Association study of a functional copy number variation in the WWOX gene with risk of gliomas among Chinese people. Int J Cancer. 2014;135:1687–1691. doi: 10.1002/ijc.28815. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Huang D, Qiu F, Yang L, et al. The polymorphisms and haplotypes of WWOX gene are associated with the risk of lung cancer in southern and eastern Chinese populations. Mol Carcinog. 2013;52(Suppl 1):E19–E27. doi: 10.1002/mc.21934. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Cancemi L, Romei C, Bertocchi S, et al. Evidences that the polymorphism Pro-282-Ala within the tumor suppressor gene WWOX is a new risk factor for differentiated thyroid carcinoma. Int J Cancer. 2011;129:2816–2824. doi: 10.1002/ijc.25937. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Enneking WF. A system of staging musculoskeletal neoplasms. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1986:9–24. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Li B, Zhu X, Sun L, et al. Induction of a specific CD8+ T-cell response to cancer/testis antigens by demethylating pre-treatment against osteosarcoma. Oncotarget. 2014;5:10791–10802. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.2505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Krishnadas DK, Shusterman S, Bai F, et al. A phase I trial combining decitabine/dendritic cell vaccine targeting MAGE-A1, MAGE-A3 and NY-ESO-1 for children with relapsed or therapy-refractory neuroblastoma and sarcoma. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2015;64:1251–1260. doi: 10.1007/s00262-015-1731-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Ahmed N, Brawley VS, Hegde M, et al. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-specific chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cells for the immunotherapy of HER2-positive sarcoma. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:1688–1696. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.58.0225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Chen Y, Guo Y, Yang H, et al. TRIM66 overexpresssion contributes to osteosarcoma carcinogenesis and indicates poor survival outcome. Oncotarget. 2015;6:23708–23719. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.4291. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Gemoll T, Epping F, Heinrich L, et al. Increased cathepsin D protein expression is a biomarker for osteosarcomas, pulmonary metastases and other bone malignancies. Oncotarget. 2015;6:16517–16526. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.4140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Guo W, Dong Z, Dong Y, Guo Y, Kuang G, Yang Z. Genetic and epigenetic alterations of WWOX in the development of gastric cardia adenocarcinoma. Environ Mol Mutagen. 2013;54:112–123. doi: 10.1002/em.21748. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]